[00:32] Do we follow the CoC for copyright files? http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/trusty/hexdiff/trusty/view/head:/debian/copyright [00:34] the code of conduct applies to everything we do while acting as representatives of the Ubuntu community; but I'm assuming you're referring to the choice of language in that copyright file, which we have no control over, because those are the actual terms of the license [00:34] (it's childish, but that doesn't change that this is the license... and that's not the only package in the archive under that license) === GridCube_ is now known as GridCube === TheDrums is now known as DalekSec === doko_ is now known as doko === freeflying_away is now known as freeflying === freeflying is now known as freeflying_away === freeflying_away is now known as freeflying === Riussi_ is now known as Riussi [11:03] if a package got in d/control in Architecture something like "mips mipsel s390x", do we need to remove them or can be there? [11:27] cjwatson: I think ARCH isn't considered with the script-rootfs [11:27] erm [11:27] live-rootfs I mean [11:34] shadeslayer, because it is ARCHES iirc [11:35] 0.o [11:35] auto/config has no thing as ARCHES [11:35] only ARCH [11:37] oh, right [11:37] how do you hand ot to the build command ? [11:37] (should be a prefix) [11:40] hm? I don't follow ... [11:40] I added --architectures i386 to the lb config command in auto/config [11:41] no, you need to set ARCH="foo" in the line of the build command [11:41] I did [11:41] hmm, works fine for me ... [11:41] http://pastebin.kde.org/pmaktsria [11:41] this is on 14.04 [11:44] try exporting it instead [11:44] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2011-June/033458.html [11:46] ogra_: I did tryhat too t [11:46] *I did try that too [11:47] http://pastebin.kde.org/pd2bgu85z [11:47] ogra_: ^^ [12:06] guys ; is there APIs site of Ubuntu ? [12:16] arun: developer.ubuntu.com [12:16] shadeslayer: Run it under linux32, that's what the buildds do. [12:17] infinity: yeah, but then this should be doable should it not? [12:17] Perhaps ARCH should also set --architecture, sure. I'm just telling you how it works right now. [12:18] (And you want to be running under linux32 anyway, to avoid the possibility of something misbehaving when it sees an x86_64 uname) [12:19] roger [12:19] infinity: other problem, when booting the x86_64 image, it says can't find /casper/vmlinuz [12:20] That, I'm less sure about. We don't actually use live-build to build ISOs, so your results will be a bit different from the "official" builds. Patches welcome to bring them more in line. [12:21] googling that issue gives me a number of hits where people said it's /casper/vmlinuz.efi [12:21] doko: Which toolchain-r PPA do you want me to copy this glibc upload to? [12:22] ubuntu-toolchain-r/test [12:22] Done. === lilstevie is now known as lilstevie-tmp === JanC_ is now known as JanC === freeflying is now known as freeflying_away === freeflying_away is now known as freeflying === freeflying is now known as freeflying_away === freeflying_away is now known as freeflying === freeflying is now known as freeflying_away [15:15] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unzip/+bug/1199239 [15:15] Ubuntu bug 1199239 in unzip (Ubuntu Raring) "[SRU] unzip list utf-8 (non-ascii) filenames as ??" [High,Fix committed] [15:16] why it stuck for quantal and raring? === rainbowdash` is now known as Mapley === Mapley is now known as rainbowdash` === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk [18:35] would anyone know why livecd-rootfs doesn't symlink binary/casper/vmlinuz-3.11.0-13-generic to binary/casper/vmlinuz? [18:35] since syslinux looks for binary/casper/vmlinuz === jono is now known as Guest99054 [21:28] jamespage: Since you merged bsh, could you have a look at bug 1254335 ? It causes multiple build failures in Ubuntu. [21:29] bug 1254335 in bsh (Ubuntu) "bsh: Builds libbsh-java package without needed maven-repo files" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1254335 [21:30] jamespage: The bug is fixed in Debian's -15 revision [22:47] cjwatson: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/1254344 when you have some time :) [22:47] Ubuntu bug 1254344 in livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu) "Syslinux for kernel + initrd that are not present" [Undecided,New] [22:48] Is anyone here a DD? If so, can you please review http://mentors.debian.net/package/testdrive === Guest66951 is now known as Mapley [23:36] Noskcaj, debian/control says Depends: debhelper (>=9), but debian/compat says 6 [23:36] directhex, really? crap [23:37] Noskcaj, debian/changelog says UNRELEASED, not a real debian version to target (i.e. unstable or experimental when closing an ITP) [23:38] Noskcaj, those are the two which leap out at me. am on windows right now so hard to test [23:38] I've fixed them both, will upload now [23:58] Can someone please rebuild kreversi and krfb on armhf? The chroot failed