
Permalink for comment 230028
RE[6]: I'd do the same
by stare on Thu 12th Apr 2007 14:55 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: I'd do the same"
Member since:

Except it's 6Gb, not 15.

Maybe in Windows-pusher land it was

It's in the world of people who at least tried to install the OS before bashing it.

Happens all the time. "Suse 9.3 was good, 10.1 is crap", "FC4 suxxx FC6 rocks" etc.

No, that's a different question. I was comparing kernels, you are comparing distros.

That's your fault. The post you replied to was about Linux in form of end-user products (i.e. distros).

BTW, if you want to compare kernels, fine, what's wrong in NT5 compared to NT4 kernel?

And as I said before, that's not the issue - the issue is who suffers when they bring out a bad product. Every other OS company or project does, Microsoft don't.

Microsoft does the same, but the latest Microsoft OS which was "bad" is Windows ME. All following OS'es (2K, XP, 2K3, Vista) are great, so they receive the well-deserved market success.

Edited 2007-04-12 14:56

Reply Parent Score: 1