

A political cartoonist's take on the 'Gore Effect'



I don't know whether to laugh or cry. What happened? 







Climate Sensitivity





Comments     Threshold


RE: Great line!
By Mindless Rambler on 12/31/2008 5:10:25 PM , Rating: 2


Are you aware that the little "unbreakable sphere" theory for atoms lasted about a century before we discovered subatomic particles and how to break them apart? And contradictory evidence? Global warming and climate change have all kinds of contradictory evidence circling about them, just like other outdated theories did. Like those other theories, contradictory evidence didn't stop them from being propagated until some bold new theory tanked the hell out of them. Then of course an incorrect theory will churn out incorrect data again and again, it's incorrect. Since you seem content with dragging me into a global warming debate even though I was making a simple criticism, I'll go ahead and state that I feel that the current thinking of global warming will likely serve the future as a simple stepping stone into better theories offering a greater understanding of our climate, how it changes, and how we affect it.

Yep its good for theories to change. But you didn't get Mdogs point. Whenever THESE theories change, they ignore it and just pretend they were right all along. It's like pretending the ancient Greeks understood the theory of relativity.

Do YOU understand now?

So when and where did the AGW pushers change their thinking from "increased co2 causes increased temperature" to something else? I never saw Al Gore's movie, did he mention some bold new theory that I don't know about? Help me out here.

