Talk:Journal of Cosmology/Archive 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive 1 Archive 2


The lede currently does not summarise the article. from WP:LEAD the lede should "... explain why the topic is interesting or notable, and summarize the most important points—including any prominent controversies." IRWolfie- (talk) 17:52, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

You're exactly right. The lede should summerize the article. Why Headcomb is going around doing mass reverts of good changes is a mystery to me. A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 18:06, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Working for NASA

Headbomb: Why did you remove the part that said that Hoover works for NASA?[1] The average person probably does not know who Hoover is (at least by name) or that he works for NASA. Earlier today, I added a sentence about NASA distancing itself from Hoover's paper.[2] Now, the sentence doesn't make much sense. Without mentioning Hoover's relationship to NASA, the reader is left to wonder why NASA would distance itself. A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 23:34, 9 October 2011 (UTC)