

The Syrian Electronic Army (SEA) attacks USMC website









Syrian Electronic Army USMC page redirect
[Image Source: The Independent]




Sources: Syrian Electronic Army on Twitter, The Independent

Comments     Threshold


RE: recognize propaganda when you read it!!
By Ammohunt on 9/3/2013 2:51:08 PM , Rating: 2
chemical weapons are ineffective militarily, but they are very effective as instruments of genocide

Sorry, if deployed properly they are extremely effective militarily ask the Iraqis. The problem is not chemicals weapons specifically its any WMD in the hands of primitive screwheads. America like Russia has huge stockpiles of Nerve Agents, Blood Agents, Blister Agents and Biological agents which haven't been used since the great war.

RE: recognize propaganda when you read it!!
By ptmmac on 9/4/2013 12:36:10 AM , Rating: 2
Against untrained troops and civilians, chemical weapons work. Against veteran troops with the proper equipment such as wwI it just didnt make a difference. In any case, it is not something we want to become as common as a weapon of war.

By Reclaimer77 on 9/4/2013 1:51:40 AM , Rating: 2
Chemical weapons in Syria, who cares.

What difference does it make if Obama has “evidence” or not that the Syrian government is using chemical weapons? It should be none of the business of the U.S. regardless of the facts. By arguing about whether Assad is using chemical weapons or not, the stage is set with a built in excuse for war, because all that has to happen to justify the carnage is some sort of “evidence,” accurate or not, that these weapons have been used. That should be irrelevant because Syria is no threat to the U.S. By framing the argument around the weapons, the government wins the argument every time, for if this time it isn’t successful, the next false flag will be.

There is now a new way to create a war. Obama has invented it.

At this point in its history, the empire no longer needs to be attacked, by an actual or fabricated attack. It no longer needs to manufacture a pretext. It no longer needs to say that there is a threat of a threat. It no longer needs to suspect weapons of mass destruction. It no longer needs to point to an humanitarian concern. It no longer needs to mention national security.

Obama’s method is simple. Make a threat by drawing a red line. There need be no relation of that line to any U.S. interest or to national defense or an attack on America. The red line can refer solely to the behavior of some government (maybe even some splinter group) in some foreign land.

Then when the line is breached, the president declares that he must attack or else his resolve and reputation for strength will be undermined. The maintenance of a commitment to make war becomes the reason for the war.

This is a bootstrap method of getting a war going. The threshold for making a war has been lowered again and again and again. This is the lowest bar yet.

By Ammohunt on 9/4/2013 2:00:47 PM , Rating: 2

I have been through NBC training and let me tell you you could not be more wrong. There is no way to completely avoid contact with chemical agents most of the equipment is provided to prolong the fight as long as possible not eliminate exposure. Exposure = casualty = win.

