rthompson235 Wrote:
Jan 05, 2013 6:09 AM
The reason Bush's victories were "suspect", while Obama "won both of his terms handily" is because he's better at corruption than Bush. The media lied, fabricated stories and hid evidence; Benghazi was completely covered up; an audio recording from a private meeting was annexed illegally, taken out of context and used to broadcast Obama's sleazy "47%" attack ads (Richard Nixon would be proud!), and there were NUMEROUS voting irregularities in multiple states that were completely swept under the rug. Examples: 1) Adults from homes for the mentally disabled being bussed to polling places and instructed to vote for Obama, 2) precincts where more than 100% of people voted.