

RE: issue #159 resolution addendum

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:32:18 -0800
Message-ID: <79107D208BA38C45A4E45F62673A434D05A53BE5@red-msg-07.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Doug Davis" <dug@us.ibm.com>, "Andrew Layman" <mail@strongbrains.com>

Nope, but I think we should be able to provide conformance rules for
language as strong as "MUST". What exactly does this requirement
enforce? Maybe the real requirement is on the sender using the attribute
to indicate the encoding?


>I never read it to mean that you couldn't do other things with 
>the xml - but if you want to deserialize it then yes you must 
>use those encoding rules - but of course we can't control what 
>people 'really' do, can we.  :-) -Dug
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2001 18:32:51 UTC
