The makeshift coronavirus hospital in Central Park requires workers to oppose LGBTQ rights

Oh yes.'s_Purse


It’s in Jude, Chapter Fifty Three, verses one hundred and twelve through one hundred and fourteen:

"And verifly it was said that the lord upon this earth, the Christ who God gave to us to redeem us, did knowst the men among you with impure thoughts, and the man who layest with men, and who layest with his sister, and with goats, and with fruitbats, and with cereal, and with very small rocks, and with… "

Well it goes on for a bit…


it can be legal and at the same time reprehensible. They aren’t mutually exclusive.


Whenever someone hands me a Bible I say “No thanks, I already know how it ends.”


Even worse, he’s a bearded middle-eastern anticap rabble-rouser. They wouldn’t just not open the door to him, they’d be trying to get him an extraordinary rendition to a CIA black site.

I have seen the xtianist mentality before


I haven’t asked them. I expect you’ll get a different answer everytime depending on who you ask, it’s a non-denominational movement.


The punchline of which is “you cannot serve both God and money.”

But the kindest words you might find in the New Testament is that when you give to the poor, it’s as if you were helping God as though you found him in the same predicament. Think of how much more benevolent Christians would be if they actually took that to heart.

Not that I’m anything but an atheist.


I find that Atheists often grok the actual message of Christ better than most Christians.


While New York City requires those workers to keep their bigoted ideas to themselves and treat everyone.

1 Like

The Oneida Community (the longest-lived & most-influential American commune) called it “Bible Communism.”


I’m trying to work up some semblance of outrage but…nothing. Sigh.

I have been living as an openly gay man since the early 80’s. As you can imagine, when it comes to anti-gay hate, there is nothing I haven’t heard before. Many, many times before. Every slur, every lie, every argument about morality, every dire warning of the homosexual doom that will descent upon the world…Hate the sin love the sinner, Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve, Leviticus 20:10, the Gay Rights Agenda, gay conversion therapy, blah blah blah.

But trust me, for years I fought the good fight. I came out. I marched. I Acted-up. I voted and lobbied and supported the right candidates. I raised funds for pro-LGBT charities and gave as much money as I could. I challenged homophobic language when I heard it, I debated and argued and sometimes shouted.

And the HIV crisis. Really bad. I lost more friends to AIDS than I care to think about. I have a very clear memory of looking across a hospital bed and watching a mother watching her son die and a very clear memory of the association between HIV and immorality that was the cornerstone of rightwing bigotry. In my mind those two things are tightly linked and it still upsets me. Eight years of Ronald Reagan and not once did he mention AIDS. The Moral Majority. Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson said the most hateful, vile and evil things imaginable publicly and proudly. It permeated into all areas of public discourse and was incredibly toxic. They were followed by Focus on the Family, the Family Research Council, and many other organizations who are part religious group, part multi-media company, and part political lobbying organization. These guys produce mountains of anti-gay propaganda including their own “scientific, medical, psychological, and sociological research” all of which “proves” LGBT people commit more crimes, molest more children, commit more suicide, take more drugs, and pretty much do more of everything else that is evil including check fraud and dog f*cking. And again all this nonsense found it’s way into the public arena. From their own tv and radio stations, web sites, and publishing it began popping up on right wing tv and radio broadcasts, countless web sites, blogs and podcasts, and in the political speeches of rightwing Christian conservatives. When they lost the same-sex marriage debate, and the much larger culture war, they looked for a new boogeyman and chose the easiest target they could find, transgender men and women. Soon it was all about public restrooms and calling him her and her him and bathroom bills and men dressing as women to infiltrate locker rooms so they could sexually assault little girls. When Trump tweeted, out of the blue, that trans-men and women could no longer serve in the armed forces I remember thinking “And so it begins again.”

Of course there was the good stuff as well. Over those thirty years I experienced first hand the phenomenal shift in society’s attitude regarding LGBT issues. And this past decade? Shocking. Same-sex marriage legalized. Over 60% of Americans support LGBT community. LGBT actors and singers and talk show hosts and TV talking heads and writers and politicians. People discussing and understanding issues regarding sexual orientation and gender and gender identity. Compared to the 70’s and 80’s even the anti-gay politicians are better, just a mere shadow of the powerful, loud-mouthed, hate-spewing bigots they once were. Today they go through all manner of mental and verbal gymnastics in an attempt not to seem homophobic and bigoted, even though that’s exactly what they are. Consider the “attack on Christianity” narrative, which was invented to shield anti-gay bigotry and it’s proponents from criticism. The new victims are bakers forced to bake gay cakes. Falwell had no problem calling people faggots and dykes and homos and lesbos and murdering, black-hearted, immoral, satanic, child-molesting psychos for daring to suggest homosexuals should be treated fairly and not discriminated against. Robertson insisted HIV and hurricanes were signs of God’s wrath because the US tolerated homosexuals. Today only the Westboro Baptist Church has the balls to shout “God Hates Fags”. The rest are neutered pussies who whine about the unfairness of being labeled homophobic and hateful for their personal religious beliefs, which are homophobic and hateful. And on and on it goes…

Which is why, after thirty years of all this, I have no outrage left for Graham and his nonsense. I am frigging exhausted of this shit. Maybe I can get motivated to hate Graham tomorrow. We’ll see.


Meh… I’m not sure that piece of shit is worth the time to even hate. I suspect that trying to roll this shit out in NYC is only going to backfire on them anyhow.

[ETA] I would say that maybe we should just point and laugh, but then again, I’m watching the first season of the handmaid’s tale, and they ended up taking over… :grimacing:


Probably true. But despite my tired and broken down sounding post, I do think it’s always important to oppose bigotry. We can’t let them control the narrative, ever, so silence isn’t an option. The idea is to show everyone why they’re wrong, how it hurts others, and why it’s worth fighting against. The goal is to convince people to not only reject the propaganda but also the people who espouse it. We want the organization powerless and irrelevant, unacceptable and unwelcome in civilized society. Now, as to religious institutions specifically, in my opinion their opposition to LGBT people issues, rights, etc… is only a problem when they become involved in the public arena. All too often it becomes a really big problem. When a religious organization seeks to influence, control or dictate public policy that is a problem. Enacting laws, amending state constitutions, opposing the teaching of evolution, demanding the teaching of creationism, etc… When an organization or person does business in the public sector and seeks an exemption from anti-discrimination laws based on religious beliefs that is a problem. If a public servant, judge, county clerk, police officer, etc…refused to follow, uphold or enforce the law based on his or her religious beliefs that is a problem.

And I think we should be vey clear when it comes to the law because it’s such an important part of the narrative. According to federal anti-discrimination law, it is illegal to discriminate on the basis of religion. Some states and cities have anti-discrimination laws that protect LGBT people and some do not. Some states have amended their constitutions to forbid the passing of any anti-discrimination laws for LGBT anywhere in the state. So what Graham and others like him want is a system that allows them to discriminate against me because of their personal beliefs, but forbids me from discriminating against them regardless of my personal beliefs. But Graham claims he is the victim. :thinking:


Agreed. As you noted, there has been progress made in the realm of public opinion on LGBQT+ rights, but that doesn’t mean things can’t go back.

:heart: :heart: :heart: and minds…

Agreed, or more importantly, when they are in power (Mike Pence). We can thank the Moral Majority for that, as they were pissed about abortion and gay rights ordinances in the 70s.

He is not, but we live in a weird world where people like him see themselves as still being persecuted like in Rome when they were being thrown to lions. Post-modernity has had some weird ass impacts, that being one major one, people who are not being persecuted, acting like they are when asked to not be dicks… I think this book describes how that happened pretty well:

Everyone likes to be the underdog, as long as they are not the actual underdog.


I will definitely check out that book. Thanks.




I disslike zealots generally, religious zealots specifically, and evangelists religious zealots fervently. That said, are these peole treating everyone that comes or are they asking patients what they believe and who they sleep with?

As I understand it, they’re taking the walking wounded type patients so that the real hospitals can focus on COVID cases.

1 Like

For what it’s worth, it doesn’t like that to me at all.

