Monday, October 28, 2019

"Gone fishing" - on a break


1. Have some guiding principles.

2. Tackle diverse research projects.

3. Read widely.

4. Don't separate research into UFOs, from research into the paranormal.

5. Take frequent breaks from research.

6. Reinvent oneself from time to time.

7. Publish your research findings.

8. Don't be afraid to respectfully disagree with other researchers.

I value those individuals who have contributed to this blog, by supplying leads to information; providing comments etc. I do also appreciate the opportunity to engage in peer discussion. However, it is time for me to take another break. So, as from 1 November 2019, I will not be publishing any new posts on this blog for the duration of this latest break.

The length of breaks has varied from three months to four years. After each previous break, I have returned refreshed, to the topic; with a clearer capacity to undertake research and again contribute to the debate.

I will catch up with you in due course. In the meantime please enjoy reading some of the other 1,051 posts on the blog.



  1. Keep this one closer to three months than four years please.

  2. Thank you for your valuable work!

  3. Take a good rest Keith! I’ll miss your regular blogs but totally understand ��

  4. Have a great break Keith, enjoy your time.

  5. Keith, I hope this wasn’t precipitated by your contretemps with Nolan on Twitter. You will be missed. I can only hope that disclosure quickens and causes you to return once more to the breach sooner rather than later.

    1. Hi anonymous, the issues raised by Dr Nolan were
      quickly resolved. My break has nothing to do with that
      matter, but thank you for checking.

    2. Thanks for all you've done. Yours is one of the most credible and responsible blogs out there. I'm hoping you will be back sooner rather than later. Cheers & best wishes!

    3. The phenomenon wants publication and promotion of their activities. Belief is their main objective. Assuming humanity ignored them and did not attempt to attribute their manifestations to belief systems, the phenomenon's work would be a total failure. Nothing the phenomenon generates is left to chance. Every anomalous manifestation is carefully engineered for calculated effect, regardless if the context is religion, UFOs, creature sightings, poltergeists, or anything else that suits their purpose. They are cognisant of everyone's background from birth. They then use this information to decide who sees what under extremely provisional localised conditions in space and time. The real losers are grey-beard scientists like Chalker, Vallee, Basterfield, Friedman, et al, who have wasted their short lives chasing rainbows. The scientific method will never work at elucidating the phenomenon, partly because the entities are always two steps ahead of humans. They anticipate our actions and act accordingly. The other factor is that the entities have no mass, hence do not conform to the physical laws of this universe. They are originally from outside this universe, hence concepts such as relativistic physics do not apply to them. If the scientific method was of any use, the phenomenon would have been solved decades ago. These researchers and believers in general are serving the entities' interests. The acronym UFO is completely erroneous. They are not unidentified (U) because at least some of us for decades know what they represent. They do not fly (F) because they exhibit zero mass, hence they are analogous to an energy source that can manifest as ostensible objects in any form they desire. They are not objects (O) because they have no mass, any ostensible ground indentations are the result of controlled force without any physical contact. The entities' true form is incomprehensible to humans, either via the physical senses, or any audio-visual means. This is due to our spatial intuition only accommodating 3-dimensional forms, which the entities are not. The best humanity can do is see the entities for the perpetual liars they are, and ignore them. These entities do not deserve even a second of our attention.

  6. Huge respect for you, Keith. No amount of words of appreciation can be written that match the quality of your research.

    Totally understand the need to take a break. Just don't leave us hanging for too long...

  7. Enjoy your break Keith. We'll miss your prompting great discussion but will carry on!

  8. Dear Keith, have a refreshing break and come back rested and full of wits. Greetings from France

  9. Take care and please be careful,
    some of those 'ladies' have penises...


An analysis of the latest Department of Defense statement on UAP
