Reply to a comment

Reply to this comment

ohknow writes:

Can someone please decipher this dog whistle column? I really am failing to get it. There were countless false reports immediately after the bombing and the hunt for the fair skinned perps.

It's somehow wrong to describe-- what surely what a legitimate and sincere effort to put out news-- that a suspect had dark skin.

But it's just dandy for Wendi to write that "More than a few studies indicate that while white people can tell the difference between white faces, they have a harder time doing so with black ones."

Those are vague and unsubstantiated words at best. At worst, they're misleading lies (which I suspect is closer to her motive).

"More than a few studies..."-- Wendi, please show one of them, please.

"...white people can..."-- isn't this purely stereotypical and racist?

Her hypocrisy is almost funny, but her omission of the only common denominator to almost all bombers and terrorists is hilarious: They're radical Muslims.

I sincerely believe that Wendi is in that radical category that was hoping the perp was a Christian, white, conservative, anti-government type so that she could hammer his race, politics, and faith.

Until we come to grips with this struggle against radical Islam, we're doomed to the death brought courtesy of the Wendi and the PC crowd.
