Reply to a comment

Reply to this comment

772stormy writes:

in response to CFLAP:

Just like most public information during political campaigns, the attack ads were vague. I would like to think that most people who follow politics and take the time to vote, see thru that kind of nonsense. Perhaps if the ads had cited specific legal cases that Mrs. Grall participated in, the case could have been better made. Also, I think the practice of switching party affiliation to influence the outcome of an election is just as "dirty" as the attack ads. If we're going to rely on a party system,I would like to see laws passed that force individuals to maintain their party affiliation during an election cycle. At least then we wouldn't be getting liberals pretending to be conservatives elected into office in a predominately conservative county. The way we elect our politicians is a sick disgusting process that is no better than an episode of "The Gong Show".

I think the elections have already become "The Gong Show"!! And I think I might also change party affiliations to influence which idiot gets into office. It has become that bad! Politics and Crooks seem to belong together, and the crooks are making sure the crooks stay in office! And if it takes changing parties to change things then I'm all for it!!!
