Environment: Content from Across the ABC


Date/Time 14 Mar 2014 7:13:47pm
Susan, You misunderstand the scientific method: predictions derived from theories should be subjected to repeated attempts at falsification. Therefore, one develops an hypothesis which is falsifiable and subjects it to examination against observational data. If we look for confounding data bu can find none, we can have more belief in the theory - but it is always only tentative. Science simply cannot 'refine and deepen the understanding of what is actually going on' (in your words) without attempting falsification. The alternative is the fallacy of looking for supporting evidence, groupthink, and the defence of theories that may well be wrong by labelling dissenting voices as 'deniers' or heretics. That is religion, not science.

Note the key falsifiable predictions of climate science: a tropical hotspot and increasing water vapour with increasing temperature. Show me the evidence, or I'll remain a 'lukewarmer'.