Zimmerman cleared in shooting of Trayvon Martin

Neighborhood watch volunteer could have been convicted of second-degree murder or manslaughter
Associated Press
Jul 14, 2013










































I never said that nonsense either. I REPEAT. WHO SAID IT DID?


Never said you made the statement. I said I was responding to your post about hanging out with racists. You mentioned the Rodney King situation and then I did. Relax!

J Cooper

Who made it about race, or yea, the one person who stated "creepy-a%* cracker" Didn't see threats of violence when OJ was acquitted.

The Big Dog's back

Fox news made it racial.


Zimmer is free to go.

VTX Rider

Yes. He is.


Bottom line is this, a jury of six women (one black and one Hispanic) cleared Zimmerman of any wrong doing. If you don't like it, then you better look in the mirror and decide who the real racist is in this case. Get over it



The Big Dog's back

All of the six members are women. Five are white, one is Hispanic. The four alternates include two women and two men, all of whom are white, but for one male Hispanic.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2...


So, and the prosecution helped select the jury.


Seems like I uncovered who the true racist is amongst us. Do you have anything you want to confess puppy?

The Big Dog's back

Apparently you can't read either. 6 women, 5 white, 1 hispanic. NO BLACKS. Did you hear that? NO BLACKS!


So is the prosecutor's office racist? After all, they were part of the jury selection. Doesn't make sense that the prosecutor would want to lose.


So what you're saying is that the black jurors would have twisted the factual law to meet the black needs? I don't get it! Hmmmmm....what's the real truth here?

The Big Dog's back

I will go real slow. You said a jury of 6 women, 1 Black 1 Hispanic. I pointed out to you there were no Blacks on the jury.


So what.


Zimmer is free to go.

VTX Rider

Yes. He is.


Since he is guaranteed a jury of his peers, then it makes sense that there were no blacks. The jury had white and hispanic members.


If it were a white young man walking in the middle of Harlem, would we be having the same conversation? I'm not racist. To me, everyone is equally worthless.


This is not about a black kid walking through Beverly Hills.


???????????????? WTH did that come from?

The Big Dog's back

Obviously it's becoming more and more apparent you can't read. Get one of your family members to read the previous post to you.


I can read, it said a white man walking through Harlem.


If following someone isn't a crime, why do parents call the police and report someone was following their kid? Whether you choose to believe it or not Trayvon was a kid. He had barely turned 17.


And the police cannot do anything to a person following a kid if that is all the person is doing. My parents also taught me to run away and go to a place of safety. Wasn't Martin close to his home? The information states he was within 70 yards of his home when he punched Zimmerman. Personally, I don't think I would have been able to determine the age of this young man. He was the size of a man, he had his hood up(it was raining) so his facial features were somewhat concealed, and he turned to the follower and started a physical altercation.

The Big Dog's back

Bullspit. If the police see the person, at the very least they question them. Start dealing in reality instead of strawman scenarios.


Of course they would question them but that is about all they can do. I didn't create any scenario. The reality is that a 5'11" male doesn't look like a kid in the dark. DUH Dumb Dog!


Why does everyone fault a watchman for following someone? For the hundredth time, following someone is not against the law. Punching someone in the face and hitting his head against the concrete is against the law. The message? If you have someone following you, you can turn around and punch him in the face and crack his skull. Oh wait, that law only applies to certain groups.