Reply to a comment

Reply to this comment

TnDan writes:

in response to hystericalsociety:

Same song, 47th verse.
Could be better,
But it's gonna be worse.

I understand that jeopardy is attached, but couldn't Chris Newsom's travails and murder be introduced as "prior bad acts"? Or is that not going to be allowed, either?

No matter. Mr. Newsom's murder will not be "erased". It is a fact.

Senile judges can ignore the elephant in the room at their own peril.

Vanessa Coleman is nothing better than something nasty on the soles of our shoes. Treat her accordingly.

As an aside, I note that Vanessa has access to hair treatments and hair coloring in prison. Who paid for those cosmetic treatments? (I can't afford that!)

She can be dressed up and made up to look human for the benefit of the jury, but I think she should be forced to appear in court as the wild-haired, bloodthirsty animal that she is.

Don't waste our time and insult our intelligence by putting lipstick on a feral hog.

You can't introduce something as a "prior bad act" if they'd been acquited of said act.

I know our justice system seems unreasonable when the defendants seem 100% guilty, but the system is geared more towards keeping an innocent person out of jail than it is putting a guilty person in - everyone, regardless of who and what crime, is presumed innocent, and its better to let a guilty man free than it is to send an innocent man to prison.
