WikiLeaks logo
The Global Intelligence Files,
files released so far...

The Global Intelligence Files

Search the GI Files

The Global Intelligence Files


US/ISRAEL - If Obama treated Israel like Reagan did, he'd be impeached

Released on 2012-10-10 17:00 GMT

Email-ID 60251
Date 2011-12-10 09:07:47
I had no idea Reagan had been so tough on the Israelis during his
presidency. This article makes me sad to see where American politics have
If Obama treated Israel like Reagan did, he'd be impeached

* Published 12:37 09.12.11
* Latest update 12:37 09.12.11
Former President Ronald Reagan's confrontations with Israel were harsh and
personal, yet Republican conservatives revere him and the Jews remember
him as a great friend.

By Chemi Shalev

Imagine if Israel would launch a successful preemptive strike against a
and the American president would describe it as "a tragedy".

And then, not only would the U.S. administration fail to "stand by its
ally", as Republicans pledged this week, but it would actually lend its
to place its nuclear facilities under international supervision and

embargo on further sales of F-16 aircraft because Israel had "violated its
commitment to use the planes only in self-defense".

Mitt Romney believes that President Obama "threw Israel under the bus"
1967 borders - what would he say about a president who actually turns his

president dismiss Israeli objections that these weapons endanger its
the spines of American Jews, that "it is not the business of other nations
to make American foreign policy". And his Secretary of State would mince
no words, just in case Walt or Mearsheimer hadn't heard the first time,
there would be "serious implications on all American policies in the
Middle East... I'll just leave it there." And then the two of them would
extend the abovementioned arms embargo, just to twist Israel's arm a
little bit more.

entire thesaurus' arsenal of synonyms for "insult" "perfidy" and "knife in
the back" have been exhausted to describe the official White House photo
of President Obama talking to Prime Minister Netanyahu with his shoes on
the table?

And what if this same president - you know who I'm talking about by now,
but let's keep up the charade - what if this same president, time after
Security Council to block anti-Israeli resolutions, but actually joined
Muslim and Communist and other heathen countries in supporting Security
Council decisions that condemned Israel for assassinating well-known
terrorists; for annexing territories that Michele Bachman has clearly
Zeit University; for waging war against the enemies of Western
civilization in Lebanon; and even for "Israel's policies and practices
denying the human rights of Palestinians." Denying the human rights of
Palestinians? Who wrote that? Judge Goldstone? Khaled Meshal?

But because Newt Gingrich is already on record as saying of the Obama
Administration that "this one-sided, continuing pressure that says it's
always the Israelis' fault no matter how bad the other side is has got to
stop," we have no doubt that he would say much worse things about this
president we're talking about, don't we?

Especially when that president called for a settlement freeze that "more
than any other action, could create the confidence needed for wider
participation in these talks"; when he threatened a reluctant Israeli
prime minister in an official letter that "the relationship between our
two countries is at stake"; when the same Israeli prime minister - that
this president couldn't stand, by the way - is forced to ask why the US is
treating Israel as if it was a "banana republic"; when this
Administration's secretary of defense doesn't veil his criticism of Israel
before a pro-Israeli crowd at the Saban Forum, like Leon Panetta did this
week, but actually tells Congress in open session that the Israeli leader
"is not a moderate"; or when the White House spokesman - Marlin Fitzwater,
for God's sake - says that the Israeli "occupation" actually "damages the
self-respect and world opinion of the Israeli people."

I mean, if Ambassador Gutman should be tarred, feathered and sacked for
saying that the Middle East conflict fuels Muslim anti-Semitism, what
should one do with a White House that is openly providing ammunition to
the boycotters and the delegitimizers? And what would all the piqued
pundits and bristling bloggers who scribed this week that the words of
Panetta and Gutman along with Hillary Clinton's off-the-record concern for
Israel's democracy prove the Obama Administration's animosity towards
Israel - what would they have to say about an Administration that often
spoke to Israel with all the subtlety of Tony Soprano holding a
sledgehammer in his hand?

And finally - and this is where we really enter the Twilight Zone, I admit
- imagine if this president not only never once visited Israel, despite
know why? Because - take a deep breath - because the Germans "feel that
they have a guilt feeling that's been imposed upon them." Poor things.

But wait, I'm not finished yet. So where does this president insist on
going, despite overwhelming Jewish objections and an emotional last-minute
Nazi unit designated as a criminal organization at the Nuremberg trials,
whose soldiers committed countless war crimes, including the razing of the
this president, this American idol of Republican conservatives, this
Nazi war criminals? That "they were victims just as surely as the victims
in the concentration camps."

NOW, SERIOUSLY, can you even begin to imagine what mayhem would break out
if Obama would say such an insensitive, obtuse and borderline
Holocaust-denying sentence? Can you picture the earthquake of rage and the
tsunami of venom that would spontaneously and simultaneously erupt and
sweep forth all the way from Fox News through Newt Gingrich to Pamela
Geller? Is it far-fetched to imagine that America would actually grind to
a halt as Republicans frantically sought a constitutional offence with
which to impeach Obama and angry multitudes gathered before the White
House lawn?

Ah, but Ronald Reagan, obviously, was not Obama, notwithstanding what some
of Obama's advisers once wanted you to believe. Reagan was the Gipper, the
Great Communicator, the father of Reaganomics, the scourge of the Evil
Empire, the great conservative revivalist who, in retrospect at least, can
do no wrong. And he was a mensch, the Jews will add, because no matter
what he did to Israel and how often he did it, his heart was always in the
right place.

And Obama? I mean, perhaps he's failed in other matters, but by all
accounts he's been a great help to Israel in many security -related areas,
he's supported Israel in countless international forums, and even if he
has made some bad mistakes, in comparison to Reagan's often roughshod
treatment of Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir, he's a Zionist-loving
pussycat, no?

That's when your interlocutor will look you in the eye and sigh with a mix
of scorn and pity. Yes, well, he's a kalter Fisch, you know, a cold fish,
he doesn't "feel" for Israel like Reagan did, he didn't want a photo-op
with Bibi, he bowed his head before the Saudi king, his middle name is
Hussein and, well, you know. We don't have to spell it out.