Reply to a comment

Reply to this comment

seabreeze writes:

in response to armstrongres:

True that the ones that are in office were elected by the majority of voters, but!!!!

Why had "none" of them campaign on this platform during the 2010 election year? not a peep. Suddenly two months after the November election
it became a hot issue???? Does it sound that they had no backbone, afraid if they campaigned on this they would not have been elected!!!!!!!!!
Had they all campaigned on this back in 2010 and
won, then so be it but it was not!

Will this past state election be the normal in the future. I can see the campaign speech now.

Hello, I'm John Doe. Vote for me. I will let you know after the election what agenda I will take. (after I talk to my lobbist that bought me.)

Solution for harmony is to postpone this RTW untill next year after it was campaigned on!!!!!

First, we would have to wait a couple of election cycles for everyone to campaign on it. Everyone isn't up for re-election this year.

Second, they campaigned on creating jobs. RTW creates jobs. Did anyone even bother to ask a candidate HOW they would create jobs? Probably not. Did anyone ask a candidate their position on RTW? Probably not. Afterall, it is not a new concept. Don't tell me that the union leaders didn't see this coming a long time ago. If a candidate WAS asked their position and that person has now CHANGED that position, then THEIR constituents have a legitimate beef.

As I said before, even if RTW passes, it can also be repealed. Let the next group campaign on repealing RTW, if they think that will get them elected. It would be a losing campaign, but they can try it.
