Skip to main content


Wall Street Journal Suggests FBI Had a Mole on the Trump Campaign

If this is true, it completely changes everything. Forget the Robert Mueller-led Russian probe. We need a special investigator for the FBI itself.

Kimberly Strassel just sent shockwaves through the nation’s capital with an opinion piece published in the Wall Street Journal. In the piece, Strassel outlines the struggle the House Intelligence Committee, led by Rep. Devin Nunes, has had obtaining secret documents held by the FBI and the Department of Justice.

The stonewalling has been so bad, in fact, that Nunes has threatened to hold Attorney General Jeff Sessions in contempt of Congress.

Yesterday, the DOJ finally handed over documents related to a top secret source that was used by the FBI in investigating the Trump campaign. Up until this point, few people have heard of this source. But it looks like congressional Republicans have been hot on the source’s trail, trying to find out who exactly has been feeding the DOJ with so much information about the Trump campaign.

Strassel reports:



This is where it gets juicy. Strassel uses all the information we know of the DOJ’s investigation of the Trump campaign, which goes all the way back to 2016, to deduce that a campaign staff member may have been a mole.

Read on:


That should be setting alarms off in your head. If the FBI put a mole on the Trump campaign, it will totally discredit the Mueller investigation. How can the FBI be trusted if it clandestinely spies on domestic political campaigns?

There’s also the slight issue that if there has indeed been a mole feeding the DOJ with information, that means the FBI lied about why it began investigating the Trump campaign, to begin with.

This looks really bad for the FBI. Really bad.

What do you think? Did the FBI put a mole on the Trump campaign? Tell us your thoughts below!