Third world transformation of the USA

Do you remember just what was meant when Mr. Obama said? “The transformation of America.”?

 Update Houston; an assistant U.S. Attorney who has been prosecuting 34 members of the white supremacist Aryan Brotherhood has suddenly announced he is withdrawing from the case because of what he called “security concerns.”

Assistant U.S. Attorney Jay Hileman didn’t say what those concerns were.

But a friend of his – who happens to be one of the lawyers for the defense in the case, thinks he’s probably worried about his family.

If government employees are in fear of doing their jobs, of prosecuting the worsted of the worsted in criminals because of personal threats, or “security concerns.” then where do all of the citizens of this country stand? How is it possible for the government to protect us?

I’m personally tired of the government or their spokes puppets standing at the podium and calling for new gun regulations, like back ground checks for the law-abiding citizen who wish to purchase a legal and 2nd amendment protected gun. Not that I’m against regulation, but what I’m against is an increase of regulations, and over regulation, like that of also implementing a national data base that can and more than likely will be abused by government at some point in time in the future.

I seem to remember what Washington said of the government, ” It is evil, but sadly a necessary evil.”

The government puppet and chief said the other day (paraphrased) “We need to have back ground checks to make the country safer from gun violence….” They (as in the liberal mind-set) still see the “GUN” as the problem? When the problem is with people possessing a normal state of mind. The criminal element is a small segment of society, which has a false belief in the tenants of unrestrained ability’s in their actions against others.

Think of it–the government thinks it can keep its citizenry safe from all kinds of dangers, by eliminating guns! But the problem is not with the implementation of some regulation/law/limitation. But the problem is with some of the population that will not ever subjugate themselves to following laws, and regulations of the land. Who are these people? How will the government best control these people, while protecting the freedoms and liberties of the law-abiding? There isn’t any population testing available in make any determinations, who will act within the laws of the land or who will not, until a law is broken?

In third world country’s law-abiding people are in-between a rock and a hard place. The government who makes the laws and the criminal elements who act with little concern for them. In this update from Houston, it shows that there is fear within the government legal justice system, whose job it is to in force the laws of the land. But violent criminal elements are acting out to intimidate the system in their favor. Stories like this are all too often recurring in any third world country. Google any third world country, and see for yourself. Of course you will also see that in these country’s people have lost their rights to protect themselves, depending totally on the government. Would you trust the Mexican legal justice system? Remembering just who has the weapons, and who does not have them, and whether the government is or isn’t corrupt. Does it surprise anyone why people come across the border illegally into the USA?

Why would we then trust in a government in this country saying, for all intents and purposes “We the government will protect you.” This same body of political puppets will not protect you by securing the borders, but demands of you to give up your own protection of yourself. Have we forgotten that no one will ever arrive from the government just in the nick of time, just before an act of violence towards you is committed?

It seems we have all kinds of money to barrow, and waste, yet not enough to pay for a super hero like super-man who always arrived in a nick of time, along with his can of whip-ass, as his weapon to swiftly dispensed swift justice towards those armed criminals of the day. Until that day, let the criminal element worry what is behind closed doors? Because it certainly isn’t super-man. With this story out of Houston they point towards a more violent criminal element as being responsible…

“In fact, there are experts who say this looks more like the work of a Mexican drug cartel. But whatever it is, to see this kind of violence happening here in America, it’s like we suddenly woke up in a third world country – except with better plumbing.”

The more we change ourselves into a governmental protected class, the less protection we will have. The more we have politicians espousing the abilities of protecting you so you don’t have to. We will resemble a third world nation where protection comes at a price no matter who’s supposedly offering it.

If the government could protect anyone except from a military conflict of some kind. Why wouldn’t they choose to protect their own employees involved in the legal justice system, from violent crime before it could happen to them? It is hard to ask the government to protect us, when we have stories like this one, which demonstrate they usually arrive after the fact.

What country IS this&

What are friends for in this parallel life’s journey within this social asylum. A kick in the…

After all what are friends for? A kick in the…? At lest they should posses and present honesty their advice. We shouldn’t expect anything else from them? A true friend would be using, brutal honesty and the power of a friends observations, to help a friend in trouble that they also love. We therefore should expect nothing but honest comments, observations, criticisms, advice, as they guide, support, and commiserate with us in our travels along our parallel life’s journey within this social asylum.

If we take a deep breath, and really listen to what is being said, and quietly taking some time to think… really think about what is being said, instead of angrily reacting emotionally. We may gain some wisdom.

A friend of a friend wrote some profound words, as their observations to what might as well be a doctors prognosis, a temperature reading of a sick social asylum, and the final analyses to what disease we are fighting. With all sicknesses or diseases, the medicine are usually bitter to taste. Prehaps this brave soul, this social MD’s words will help to bring about at the very least a recognition of the condition, as well the stage of the disease, and a willingness to take the bitter pill, over that of just excepting our demise? Surviving any sickness, or disease, requires a willingness to fight it!

At what point is a freedom fighter a social terrorist, an obstructionist, an infectious organism, to the progressive liberal mindset that sits in opposition to the concept of what America was founded upon? What happened to those same concepts of life liberty and the pursuits of happiness, or of individual freedom, and the responsibility’s that go along with it?  Why is it, in supporting these things we have been viewed politically as “Obstructionists” when we indeed are nothing but “Conversationist / Freedom Fighters” who would like to preserve America as founded? When did these values lose their luster, or social value, while getting replaced with socialism’s false guarantees? Socialism is birthing the utopia of the mesmerized, envious lazy minded individuals, through its religion of unrealistic pursuits, of equal out comes, and average existences, and misery for all. A managed decay is its only contributions to the world at its very best?

Why have we failed to recognize the failed policies of socialism as our politicians present them to us? When has socialistic utopias the world over ever supported themself’s? They have all needed to be rescued or bailed-out, by free market capitalism in order to continue to exist. For those who believe in the concepts of evolution ( where everything must adapt, and only the strongest will survive) why do we as a people support political failures, or the weakest of political parasitic organisms, where misery is their greatest contribution to their populations and to the world? Why then would we who live in the shadows of such great failures, and misery’s, volunteer to do the same, without much as giving any opposition to it?

There has been no greater waste of resources of human efforts, and charity. Then those misguided contributions, given as emotional gift of charity; in the hopes of helping people while supporting political leaders and their policies that have done nothing but take from the population. Destroying human dignity, human potential, the ability in improving themself’s, or talents, or even their lot in life.

Thanks Mark for passing along this friend of your statements.

Mark M
The saddest, albeit possibly most accurate short message you will read that was  written by a USMC Vet. ( I can’t argue with any of it.  Passing it along as it was received. )
He wrote: The American Dream ended (on November 6th) in Ohio. The second term of Barack Obama will be the final nail in the coffin for the legacy of the white Christian males who discovered, explored, pioneered, settled… and developed the greatest Republic in the history of mankind. A coalition of Blacks, Latinos, Feminists, Gays, Government Workers, Union Members,  Environmental Extremists, The Media, Hollywood, uninformed young people, the “forever needy,” the chronically unemployed, illegal aliens and other “fellow travelers” have ended Norman Rockwell’s America. The Cocker Spaniel is off the front porch…the Pit Bull is in the back yard. The American Constitution has been replaced with Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” and Chicago shyster, David Axelrod, along with international Socialist George Soros will be pulling the strings on their beige puppet to bring us Act 2 of the New World Order. Our side ran two candidates who couldn’t even win their own home states, and the circus fattster Chris Christie helped Obama over the top with a glowing “post Sandy” tribute that elevated the “Commander-in-Chief” to Mother Teresa status. People like me are completely politically irrelevant, and I will never again comment on or concern myself with the aforementioned coalition which has surrendered our culture, our heritage and our traditions without a shot being fired. You will never again out vote these people. It will take individual acts of defiance and massive displays of civil disobedience to get back the rights we have allowed them to take away. It will take Zealots, not moderates–not reach-across-the-aisle RINOs to right this ship and restore our beloved country to its former status. Those who come after us will have to risk their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor to bring back the Republic that this generation has timidly frittered away due to “white guilt” and political correctness….. I’m done.

Safety hostage takers! Presidential thievery! And the sequester.

Presidential thievery through the use of red meat rhetoric as the weapon of choice and practices of policies within the sequester is coming to you soon! We must be prepared to act as informed voters to these subject matters. Because acting like A.D.D. voters of the low informed kind, is of no good to the defence of the nations liberty’s.

With the negatives to the sequester looming, how will it affect the economy, seems to be the only debate among politicians? No one is interested in making a real effort in discovering how best to avoid the negatives within the sequester, just the magnification of them. Mr. Obama solution to his created problem seems to be, emphasizing the problems and presenting the other political party in the most negative lime light, through the use of red meat rhetoric as the weapon of choice and practices. Mr. Obama, who would rather choose to party, celebrate, or vacation, then in finding solutions himself. His offerings, presented to the economic Gods of socialism, inflict maximum pain on the population while common sense is being quickly swept under the rug, hoping that no one will noticed.

Under the flag of procrastination our government governs one crisis into many more. In a blink-of-an-eye Mr. Obama is just now realizing that we have to do something. like a kid who is realizing that he has a science project do in days,  and has wasted almost all of his time, finely decides to do something. His reaction; Chooses to blame others for his own procrastination.

A look at the cuts and the chilling impact the administration says they would have on the economy goes like this. Find the most uncomfortable services that the public will most likely complain about and cut them relentlessly….




-Homeland Security: Fewer border agents


-Environment: Diminished Environmental Protection Agency monitoring of oil spills,



-Not to mention other idle threats made to the citizens of this nation, like Joe Biden who said (paraphrased), “An increase of rape and violent crimes may be on the rise without increased spending on police officers and other public safety services.” As the justification for more uncontrolled, unwise, wasteful spending.

Just a good reason to have control of your God-given rights, and not the government taking them away, like their attempts with the second amendment.

But then we have hostage takers in office, where they would rather take some needed services, placing them in a so to speak head-lock, and placing a gun to those services heads, demand more of the same reckless spending on your children’s credit card issued by the bank of China, or else say good-by to these services!

What kind of politicians uses these kinds of tactics against the people of his or her’s own nation? It isn’t any good long-term policies or of any good for the people. But more bad policies piled up against or upon past bad policies, all the while risking the people’s safety, by the same people, sworn to protect and up hold their safety. In other words, these politicians are threatening the safety because they refuse to do the job of, cutting waste from the government’s budget, in so doing they threaten, instead of protecting the growth of the economy. Cutting the waste out of government or shrinking the size of the same would be limiting to the tax burden on the people, and pro-growth.

There is no differences to our modern-day politicians, and modern-day mugger’s on the streets of Chicago. Everyone knows that mugger’s are breaking the law and acting without human decency, the other uses the power over the people justifying their own actions of theft, through making laws that destroys human dignity, good will, and trust.

Mr. Obama created the sequester, rather than now excepting the blame for a bad policy and idea, as well as acting like an adult person in finding solutions. His actions are that of just implementing political leverage. As the head of the Democratic party, the commander and chief of thug politics, and political thievery, Mr. Obama has shown his true colors of Chicago politics, and corruption of the political proses. Policies like this will only cause the people to make every effort in protecting themselves from the long arm of the government, causing a farther slow-down in the economy at worse, or more of the same at best.

With Obama in office, the people shouldn’t expecting the government to protect the people from the barbarians at the gates, it will be more like….. Pay your toll (higher taxes) for more of the same wasteful spending, or be thrown to the mercies of those barbarians within our gates.

Destroying imaginations?

In the world of education, presented by educators that also draw their paychecks from the federal and state governments, it is plan to see they mostly posses a leaning towards a liberal mindset. So is it good to question motive, if any, to their teaching methods, in an effort to avoided a public education that resembles more of a indoctrination to a liberal philosophy, over unbiased pursuit of knowledge based on truth?

At what point is it too much of an education to give to developing minds, and who should decide if so? Can an education do more damage to a human mind, then good?

Colorado second-grader suspended for throwing IMAGINARY grenade during recess

Aren’t schools supposed to provide educations within a supervised safe environment, for purposes of expanding young minds no matter what the age of that student? Isn’t an education in part a shared responsibility and the job of parents, along with teachers, to inspire imaginations of young people to dream the impossible, to look behind the curtain of life with curiosity?

Every great thinker and inventor has used an active imagination, driving the individual to dream, to innovate, in making dreams and unknown technologies into realities produced in the present. Also known by catch phrase as “Moving forwards”.

An education is bridling the power of thought, inspired to action, in moving towards that future yet imagined. Without the active use of imaginations in our world, we wouldn’t have computers, or all sorts of entertainments, or even books to read, net alone things that are common place for most people used daily without thought, like cars. So when a school system limits a child’s imagination, are they not also robbing that child of their education, or at least damaging or retarding that child’s human potential in an unmeasured way, by potentially crushing their ability’s, or willingness to imagination farther?

Even John Lennon had a song called “Imagine” where people were called to imagine a world different to the present world, different to the world that existed when he wrote the song, different to today’s standards. Had he been this little boy in school, he too could have been suspended, by expressing unpopular imaginations. Can an imagination go too far, and becomes just as dangerous as a weapon?

So no matter where we stand on education, pro or con, we should expect a healthy dose of imagination to be encouraged in our youth, for the pursuit of a well-rounded education, from a school system charged with turning out an educated adult. An education devoid of including, critical thought, or thinking outside of the box, without also including in that realm the encouragement of the use of imagination. Is not really an education, but a political correct indoctrination, a type of brain washing through emotional reasoning or emotional peer pressure in administering a popular education. Children are at a disadvantage in being able to reason philosophically with adults, therefore venerable to the political or liberal presentations masked as an unbiased education.

Who decides what is a good imagination or a bad one, when we are discussing, or defining the thoughts or actions of a child that creates it. Are we to believe that people are born evil or good, so actions of said people are then predetermined? Is there at some point in time, an age of accountability, to what may be considered right and wrong things to imagine? Who then should decide, or teach what is or isn’t proper imagination? The thought police?

Colorado second-grader suspended for throwing IMAGINARY grenade during recess

In remembering what it was like to be a child, when everything seemed unlimited, where the many possibilities were always possible, where the impossible wasn’t recognized as obstacles, but just a short-term delays on our way to those destinations of personal greatness. Have we forgotten what satisfaction, or a sense of accomplishment felt like, even those imagined which inspired us in making an effort? Why should we then throw the political correct wet blanket over a child’s ability to dream, or to imagine, because what others only see as an imagined threat?

In our world of political correctness what damage have we created within this little boy’s education, or personal views of what is good or bad, what is good or evil, or which is stronger, or who will prevail in any struggle? Even in all of the movies that Hollywood produces there are elements of good and evil, where good always wins. In today’s world there isn’t any question in the argument, the only question that remains is who will define it? What is truly shocking is the carefree attitude of this boy’s parent in accepting her schools actions with regards to the education received, by the veiled attempt of that school in destroying youthful imagination, without parental outrage.

Super heroes who are battling evil, or who are trying to re-adjusting the balance of power between good and evil, in the support of a positive moral compass equally for everyone. Should not only be found in comic books designed for the imaginations of kids, but displayed in real life actions. Parents should never lose sight of their super hero status. Those bigger than life, those real life characters within parents, who in their childs eyes are always to be their super heroes; those same people whose jobs are to be defending by preserving the rights of kids, to be a kid, allowing them to enjoy their innocence, over that of being corrupted at a young age by a social brain washing of political correctness.

Parents are therefore that last line of defence, that supper hero re-adjusting that balance of power, that will tug and pull at their childs emotions. So imagine for a moment if you will, if you still have an imagination, and an unbiased willingness to use it? When has a super hero ever refuse to do those thankless jobs big and small, or allow themselves the freedom in giving in to the mindset or notion that evil will prevail? Saying to themselves,” So what is the use?” Simply because the job may be uncomfortable to do?

It is time conservatives push back respectively against the liberal mindset of political correctness, the insanity that suspends a second-grader for throwing IMAGINARY grenade during recess in Colorado, and sees nothing wrong with passing out the “morning after pill” to kids in New York schools, unknown to their parents, or with any knowledge of their medical histories of those young students receiving them.

Some NYC schools to offer  the morning-after-pill via @CBSNews

This is the kind of mindset that has no future!!  Are we to remain free, with our liberty’s intact, to give to our children as their inheritance that same liberty that we enjoy. Then we must evoke the power of being that super hero, and imagine victory.

Guns, Rifles, knifes, hammers, and knee-jerk-reactions!

On the stupidity scale, brain-dead politician take the golden scale awards. Alow me. Because there is a real need to keep the public safe from all dangers in life. The government must get involved in everybody’s lives to protect them from themselves. We all know the dangers of guns in the publics hands, and out in public? Because of gun deaths of children in schools of late. So it is only natural for the government to have a knee-jerk-reaction. Or is it?

Well lets see. Kids are getting killed in school, kids getting to fat in school (leading to diabetics)… in turn early health haszerds….even death. In both of these cases state governments, federal government got involved. On the kids getting diabetes… by drinking too much soda! Solution ban large and supper size soft drinks, like New York did. but soda isn’t the only thing that leads to being over weight. Besides drinking smaller drinks, but more of them doesn’t accomplish much either. But the public perception is government cares about the smallest of all Americans. Though that perception is false, it doesn’t solve anything or control anyone in changing their behaviours.

Banning guns doesn’t solve issues with safety in schools either. The lawless don’t follow laws, don’t care about rules, and find the easiest victims in gun free zones… like schools.

When governments local, state, and federal make regulations, laws, that do little to promote a change of choice in people who have already chosen to be lawless. There is no increase of safety! In fact there is a decrease of safety. Because the law enforcement can’t be everywhere at the same time, there is a lag in reaction by law-enforcement in confronting criminals.

The FBI came out with a report that stated that other weapons are more dangerous than guns. Why? Why hasn’t government also engaged the public in debate on these new dangers? Read the report below:










So should we outlaw blunt force trauma objects/weapons or the hands that would deliver the blow to the victim? Taking all of the firing pins from weapons that the public has, leaving them with the possession of their beloved weapons, could also leave them with a more lethal weapon by statistical comparison if used as a club.

Yet with knee-jerk-reactions silly arguments are often made to make a point, that results in a pointless, meaningless, statistical outcome. Look to prohibition in history. The results were a higher crime rate, more societal problems, and a re in statement of the legalization of alcohol. Even with all of the drunk drivers in the world still today, that are also killing people at an ever higher rate then guns or rifles at least. The governments answer to this problem is taxation, the profit motive, over public safety. Even a week knee-jerk-reaction of outlawing parking lots at bars would be better to give a concerned perception of public safety.

statically speaking; the government isn’t going to do anything that wouldn’t also increase their power over the people as a whole. safety be damned! Because there is no provision in the constitution to being able to take the people’s weapons by the government. Any such law would be unconstitutional. Unless the people would volunteer to give up their weapons. Aw! The motivation for government to use any tools at their disposal to change the publics minds with emotional pressures, in changing the total mindset.

Remember that all law enforcement agency’s have the policies of takeing control of a dangerous situation by meeting force with force of equal or superior means. In the time that it takes for law enforcement to arrive after your 911 call. What weapon of choice would you like to use, in meeting any criminal force against you, or your family? A knife in a gun fight? Fists of furry against a saturday-night-special? Or being able to freely choose for yourself, meeting force with force of equal or superior means by the weapon of your choosing? No matter what your personal choices may be.

To have a weapon or not! We must always remember the right to bare arms was to protect us against a criminal acting government using the power of ternary to rule the day over us.

If motivation is to protect our kids in school as the motivating factor by government to do anything. Let them put law enforcement into schools to keep the peace. After all having law enforcement in any city doesn’t eliminate crime…. it reduces it!!! Taking guns away from law-abiding citizens makes an unarmed victim of opportunity for the lawless! Just ask the victims family’s of crime in Chicago how crime has been reduced because of the gun laws?

No need to have a knee-jerk-reaction with all of the deaths caused by blunt force trauma then. Or we may get a government willing to support mass amputations of hands, or at least opposable thumbs, in the name of public safety!

Perpetual Crisis’s of necessity

When the angels of darkness gather together blotting out the bright nature of our future yet to come. What powers of the common citizen can then be deployed in returning sanity to the governing power to be? With every dollar borrowed on the citizens behalf by a corrupt politician, unopposed by that citizen, the citizenry excerpts the chains of debt that bind them to a life of slavery.

Freedom of speech allows us to make an attempt at wakening the sleeping giant of the American people. The question that remains, are we asleep, or have we been poisoned?

It wasn’t all that long ago that Rahm Emanuel said; You never want a serious crisis to go to waste: via @youtube. Governing by allowing the country to go from one crisis to another, allows the forces within government to manipulate power, and, the publics emotions, using emotional terror, in order to manage the crises. There never seem to be any governmental Politian with political back bone enough, to then choosing to use it, while presenting policies of some new bold ideas in avoiding future serious crises. Even the presentations of late of policies or legislation in solving one crisis only seems to lead to a renewed crisis’s of the future. The follies of such policies are never fully recognized, or are they, they are never argued persuasively as why they are follies? If this is the case, shouldn’t we then collectively be questioning our politician’s motives?

The fiscal cliff was one such crisis that was nothing more than one side saying that we need more revenues to help with our out of control budgets. The other side stated that we have a spending problem not a taxing one.

What was solved? We raised taxes on some rich guys which amounts to being able to run the government for some nine days worth in new in revenues. Wow Crisis averted! But what about the spending side of things? Nothing but empty promises for future cuts. The next crisis is already put on the calendar. The government will run out of money in two or three months if we don’t raise the debt limit. Allowing government to barrow even more money. Wasn’t that what the cliff was about in short….. allowing ourselves to borrowing and spending more than we were going to tax people in the first place?

A simple analogy on the governments way to solving problems is….. You have just come home from vacation and discovered a sewage pipe burst and filled your home to the roof with sewage. Solution…. Raise the roof!

Hitting the debt ceiling time and time again. Only demonstrates there is a spending problem. Using the manufactured crisis of a potential debt down grade, we shouldn’t have the attitude, that if we don’t barrow more money and fast the crisis will get bigger. This only magnifies the future uncomfortable condition the nation will have to endure when no one is willing to lend and there is nothing left to tax in order to repay the debt.

Moving from one crisis to another, a self-imposed crisis created wholly by government actions or inaction, is a form of mental and emotional terror of the public. An abusive manipulation of the public’s trust. An incompetent form of leadership whose definitions of success would only lead to rearranging the chairs on the deck of the Titanic. Over that of making an attempt at avoiding sure disaster….. Or the next crisis.

If our Politian’s of today are only seeking to manage the decay with their political actions? Then they are also admitting by their actions along with a lack of intestinal fortitude, that there is nothing to gain by doing something positive. Only admitting through their actions to everyone, the rot cannot be stopped! A defeatist attitude at best, an attitude of applying a mismanagement within a managed decay, then presenting it to society as a job well done, rather than actively searching to stopping the decay. These modern Politian’s are only offering a slowing of the impending rot to the core doom of our society, while presenting distortions of it as a brighter future yet to be realized.

If these modern politicians, visionaries of doom, disciples of destruction, had to be measured by their worth to society as a governmental official in the same way as they would have to measure themselves in the privet sector, working in a for profit business. The public would see real fast that the government and the career politician, are promoters of failure, instead of being the protectors of innovation and success.

What ever happened to that bright shiny city on the hill kind of presentations by any Politian’s? Truly positive presentations given to all of us as a future to look towards to, is what seem to be missing? Or have we accepted those pale pastel colors of failed ideas as being more comfortable than accepting those vividly bolder colors of new ideas, as well as the efforts needed to realize them?

The problem isn’t within our Politian’s presentations of a brighter future. It is in the understanding of it. For they all a spouse to a futuristic dream of better times, while pointing towards the boogie-man of any present crises, as to what is keeping us from getting there. But then our Politian’s are working only in attaining, and maintaining, their positions of power. A politicians life is a more comfortable life, a life of ease different from that of the average citizen. It is this kind of bright future they have sold themselves to. Having to resort to the use of manipulation through crisis’s to insure their futures will be filled with a brighter shining light on that hilltop were they live. While manipulating the general masses in sell their human potential, and their God-given bright futures, along with their, freedoms, and rights, for some mythical dirty pieces of silver.

If our Politian’s were to make an honest attempt at cleaning house, and providing some bold new ideas for a collective brighter future. They may be in favor of term limits, a balanced budget, paying down the debt, simplifying the tax code, and returning some of the governing powers back to individual states to manage for themselves. (Example; the department of education just to name one). All the while recognizing these types of changes also would have the federal government excepting some short-term pain, as well some diminished powers over the people. But then isn’t this why a crisis is never a good thing to waste? Government is always at war with the people in expanding its powers over the people. Who are the people to trust if their politicians are misrepresenting themselves as being something other than, evilly corrupt, manipulative. Left to their own devices with no term limits they distort government’s job through mental gymnastics of sorts and a clever creation of crisis after crisis and solutions that amount to nothing more than buying some voter blocks, and their votes.

A government that creates a solution to any present crisis, refusing to use critical thinking in finding that more perfect solution, so as not to add to any future crises. Has adopted the policies of crisis as the acid to eroding our constitutional freedoms and rights, in favor of a more perfect manipulative power of tyranny.

The only crisis that deserves swift response is the one of this nation being under attack by outside forces.

Perpetual crisis of necessity is the mother’s milk of maintaining power of corruption through greedy intent delivered by the politician like a venomous snake. Through its bite it applies the policies of “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste” Yet setting the stage for the next. Applying this kind of political solution, the venomous intoxicants only contributes to more of the same in the future while patronizing society from turning away from it. It is the angles of hell that applies the secret temptations of greed all the same to politician, and citizen alike. The politician uses these intoxicants to hide their irresponsible actions, or greedy intent. A crisis only seems to give an unforgivable insult to the oath of office; for it is the love of the crisis that applies this kind of action within the individual’s inspiration to works harder, in allowing tyranny to creep into their seat of political power, for the porpoises of maintaining that power.  Affecting their thoughts secretly at first, then convincing them to action, because they believe these political policies will never affect their lives in the same way. At the same time, they are knowingly selling their country men’s freedoms to the lowest bidder. Favoring corrupt power over preserving the ideas for all to have the same equal pursuit of happiness.

The greedy politician is more vicious, and more corrupt than that of any rich man hiding behind his money. For a rich man knows he cannot take his money with him in the end. So may then turn to use his wealth in helping others. But the politician understands the power of the office is the simplest form of immortality, never having to give back any newly acquired powers of the government represented by the laws passed, that will affect generations.

Resident evil! The Newtown massacre, tattooed onto the tapestry of our minds.

The massacre in Newtown has been tattooed onto the tapestry of our minds memories to a point that we cannot escape the horror of it, are we just trying to exorcise it from our minds by affirming our mutual sorrow and rage over what evil has been done, by now misplacing our emotions with collective rage?

Too many of us waste our time standing in the darkness of a cold world. Forgetting our childhood upbringing, the ones our parents made their best attempts at teaching us through some religious values, while introducing us to the concept of taking personal responsibility’s. Afraid of the darkness society has become paralyzed with fear from entering the light of enlightenment while accepting the personal responsibility for one’s self in choosing between good over that of evil. As mortals, coming to realize that we do not battle against flesh and blood, but rather we battle within ourselves a great battle of “Good vs EVIL”. That hidden little secret, that dirty something, within our own thoughts that has lasted throughout all time—- over every generations past to present, at times is harder than we think to fashionably except. Evil resides in us all.

It is easier to blame something, or someone, in making excuses or in giving an impression of being out of control. Maybe if we believe in an out of control world there is less of a case we have to make in taking some control of our lives, or even with our own actions, decisions, or choices…ECT.

Recently Joe Scarborough passionately stated that his views have changed on both the 2nd and the 1st Amendments (he appears to want action against violent video games and movies). I am sure that some games, movies and TV, is harmful (especially for the already disturbed mind), I am not so convinced there is a government solution to any problems of society that involves people having to make a choice of what will influence them to action between good vs evil.

People who embrace the ideas of doing evil will always pick the easiest victim, giving them the best chance to survive to do it again. So banning the  gun or even all guns of any kind does nothing to change the thoughts within the minds of any prudential killers. Of course, there is no necessary cause-effect relationship of gun bans and a reduction in gun related deaths ( Chicago is just one such example ). Nor is there any examples of government being able to regulate effectively thoughts out of the minds of its citizenry. In affect banning evil thoughts in anyones mind vs. popular mind control of the weak-minded. Convincing people of the “evil” of an inanimate object.

If placing a well-meaning ban, or governmental regulation is the answer, then why not ban Drugs, and alcohol which has damaged more people’s health through disease or early death by car accident, and acts of violence (no matter what weapon was used) while under the influence. But then you say we tried that once and look what happened. Besides that, it was a long time ago; back when we all had a greater tendency towards traditional or religious beliefs. Why did it not work then, and why should it work now? The problem with legislating evil out of existence when it has never ever not at any time in history ever worked. Is asking evil to consume itself.

Might there be some restrictions or ways in which we could improve safety and stop killers? I would listen to any well thought out plan that could actually keep kids safer and stop evil monsters of this kind.  But I will not aid in turning law-abiding people into criminals simply for appearances sake in the name of “doing something” if it doesn’t actually stop killers and criminals. So I’ll keep on supporting the 2nd Amendment.

The best way in protecting our kids in school is to have armed police officers there, doing the jobs of protecting those kids. The police can’t be everywhere all at once, but by placing them at a point of what evil minds have already determined as being the easiest of targets is a deterrent to evil actions. At least it would remove from evil the ability to easily find unarmed victims to exploit.

Anyone who would then make this kind of statement “We need to work on, so this kind of tragedy will never happen again!”, a statement that the NRA president said the other day is just foolish! The gun isn’t the evil we battle against, it is the evil that starts out as a small thought, nurtured into action by someone who has given into the evil within themselves. In other words people with some evil intent within their minds are everywhere; they just don’t give into those impulses without making a choice. We can never outlaw evil, or limit it and the thought there of, by regulations and laws. It is the evil within that says to any person who entertains it, ” Laws don’t apply!” For these kinds of regulated false hopes only open the doors wider for an even greater evil to enter into society.

What strikes me when I hear the media pundits conversation on  finding “solutions” so far is that instead of wanting to discuss it and hear what might actually work (and what choices might work better than others), these media pundits and politicians seem more eager in supporting emotional legislation to “get something done” so that they can put the issue behind them. Over really doing the tough job of having to recognize the battle isn’t between flesh and blood. We can not give into the do something disease, and do the unnecessary three times faster in the hopes to defeat evil within the minds and thoughts of men and women.

We may all have the common belief that people are mostly good at heart. But we must never fail to also recognize that people never pre-announce their evil intent to do evil unarmed. Why is that? If “GUN CONTROL” was the simple answer to this problem of the mind, why is the “City of Chicago” struggling to come to grips with the almost daily gun-shot victims and needless deaths of their youth. While also having the toughest “Gun Control” laws on the books in the country. clearly “Gun Control” laws, regulations, and emotional legislations aren’t the answer then.

The real issue in “GUN CONTROL” is not the gun; it is in the ability to choose for one’s self to control one’s self. Placing an evil gun in the hands of any police officer, doesn’t prevent evil in someone’s mind to then follow through with evil intent on exploiting the unexpected victims of opportunity. Clearly it is the issue of choice! The choice of government through the influences of evil, presenting the case that it doesn’t trust any citizen to choose for themselves between good actions over evil ones. Over those choices made by this country’s citizenry in recognizing good intentions are the paving stones to the highway to hell! Good intentions are the obstacles to preserving freedom of choice!

The almost daily gun-shot victims and needless deaths that the people of Chicago are experiencing shouldn’t be the extinguishing acts that puts out the fires of common sense. Too many of us are waste our time standing in the darkness of a cold world totally forgetting why it has become so cold in the first place. The massacre in Newtown should not be tattooed onto the tapestry of our minds memories with paralyzing horror. Society shouldn’t ever be patronized into excepting reaction over that of that of common sense pro-action. What should be more horrific to us is that we cannot escape totally the evil of people when they choose to alow evil thoughts to take over their ability to act in a good way towards others. We should be more afraid of the darkness in society who chooses a command and control government to legislate, and regulate emotional controlling laws. In affect never letting a crisis go to waste. It will be at that time when true evil exists, when we become paralyzed with fear from entering the light of enlightenment, being only able to choose to accept progressive personal responsibility for one’s self out of emotional reaction.

There has never been through time a legislated emotional well-meaning law that hasn’t also become the mother’s milk of tyranny, the pure energy of evil. Nor is there any evidence of reduced violence by demanding compliance to it. It is just plain impossible for any government to control the “Resident Evil” that resides in us all.