Monthly Archives: July 2017

GeenStijl, a final time

I have written about GeenStijl several times. They are an interesting bunch. There’s just no American media equivalent.

Imagine a journalist interviewing McCain: “mr McCain, you’ve come out of cancer treatment only to block the repeal of Obamacare — people are saying it’s kind of a dick move. What say you?” 

Now, imagine McCain had to respond in a serious matter or risk losing face. That is the position GeenStijl occupies in the Netherlands. They interview politicians in a very direct manner, and politicians begrudgingly have come to accept GeenStijl’s position of power.

I conclude that GeenStijl is firmly in the Alt-Lite camp. They are (more and more) willing to address leftist insanity, immigration and problems with Islam. They are not willing to go further (no addressing the JQ, no outright dismissal of Islam, no outright dismissal of emancipation).

The main problem with GeenStijl and the Dutch right in general remains that they are knee-deep into liberalism. Yes, the same liberalism American ‘libtards’ are into, only more European. Points include: emphasis on personal freedom, separation between church and state, emphasis on the constitution. Yes, they are in fact a bunch of libertarians and yes, they believe the French enlightenment is the best thing since sliced bread. Alas, all that simply isn’t sustainable. Libertarianism is increasingly irrelevant and the enlightenment is a lie.

But hey, no enemies to the right. GeenStijl guys, if you’re reading this, DM me for a guest-post on your wondrous pink site. If you like me in English you’ll love me in Dutch.




The 4 factions of the right

1. Normie-Right

The normie-right is the biggest group.  Think your average non-leftist heterosexual male; he just wants some money, friends, entertainment, a girl. He does not want headache induced by heated political debates.

Because they are the biggest group they exert the biggest control over their superorganism. Yet they are the moderates, so they are most easily influenced. Per Moldbug: “if you were a moderate in Vienna in 1907, you thought Franz Josef I was the greatest thing since sliced bread.” And indeed the normie-right has been greatly influenced by progressive leftists in the past 200 years, been influenced so much that  cuck has become a great and visceral insult. 

The pendulum is now swinging in the other direction; the normie-right is being influenced by the dissident right (faction 2 3 4). For instance, on paper the normie-right has no reason to hate immigrants or browns; Human BioDiversity is an entirely dissident right science. Trump’s wall is ideologically defended by the dissident right, not by the normie-right whom mostly just enjoy the juicy drama surrounding the wall.


2. Alt-Lite

Within the dissident right the alt-lite is the biggest faction. They see problems with globalism, with the EU, with Islam and with immigrants. They are eager to pick up the 100 dollar bills the left has littered the pavement with. But they do not want to rock the boat too heavily. Civic nationalism for the win. They do not like to talk too much about blacks, Jews and women. They are as edgy as edgy gets before people become too uncomfortable.


3. Alt-Right

The Alt-Right are proud white men, angry men, pissed at how the breakdown of Western society has left them with slutty women and low status. They enjoy rocking the boat. They openly discuss race, the JQ and the degeneracy of modern women. Gas the Jews, white ethnostate now, that sort of thing. Mostly they are anonymous, but rest assured: they are among us and they are more numerous than you’d think.


4. Dark Enlightenment

The smallest part of the dissident right, where ideas are not discussed on base of popularity but on their intrinsic truth. Here it does not matter how many clicks you receive, what matters is how truthful your observations are. This is just as messy as you might expect; man comes closer to truth mainly by bashing egos with other men and even then it is a questionable process. But it is undeniable that the Dark Enlightenment comes up with the dankest political philosophy memes.

It is the position of this blog that James A. Donald aka Jim has the best plan among the Dark Enlightenment thinkers. Jim’s plan is slightly similar to the Alt-Right, except more nuanced on Jews, more strict on women. If the Right is to save the West, to usher in an age of prosperity, to avoid the coming dark age, the closer it adheres to plan Jim, the better.

Game is awesome

Sometimes we get so caught up in being bad that we forget how good it is to be bad.

Used to be I was clueless in dealing with women. Then I learned game from men like Roosh, Krauser, Rollo Tomassi, Mark Manson, Heartiste and Jim. And now I simply know how to deal with women.

Krauser once tweeted: once you learn game you start loving women for the same stuff you used to hate them for. I’ve found this to be completely true. I used to resent women for their whimsical nature, their unpredictability, their completely different way of filtering reality. Now I love them for it.

Dealing with women has become easy, because women naturally defer to a strong man. A good woman wants to make a bad man happy. They want to treat you in the way that you want to be treated. You just need to steer her in the right direction. Once you know how to do this, women simply stop being a problem in your life. 99 problems but a bitch ain’t one, as simple as that.

Much can be said about keeping a woman. Per Jim, it is difficult to explain the right method in words, because people differ and are apt to misinterpret your advice. You need to capture the spirit of keeping a woman; it is like keeping a dog, except that she is not a dog, she is a woman.

(A dog needs a bone, a woman needs to be boned)

Women need the man of steel and velvet. The man of steel part is creating the sandbox for her to play in. Your world, your rules. She wants to know that the buck stops with you, which is why it’s so important you tell her ‘no’ every so often. Then there’s the man of velvet part. Women need tender love and affection; it seems you can’t tell them often enough how proud you are of them. I know I am still surprised by the amount of cuddling my woman needs.

Game is not some full-proof method to completely control your woman. Women create drama, it’s what they naturally do. But game allows you to deal with their drama, allows you to exert just the right amount of control over the situation so as to steer it in the optimal direction. At any rate that is what game has done for me. And I know my woman loves me for it. Game is awesome.

No such thing as independent institutions

A progressive lie that has annoyed me recently is the idea of independent institutions. No institution is independent. Life chooses sides, has to choose sides, otherwise said life will be gobbled up by other life that chooses to side against said life. No easier enemy to defeat than the enemy that refuses to fight you.

So in practice all institutions choose sides sooner or later. And whenever interference by rightists in an institution is name-called by leftists as an ‘attack on its independence’ you may wager money that said independence is in fact dependence upon leftists. Is there any one who genuinely believes that Robert Mueller’s special counsel investigation into Trump’s connections with Russia is independent? It’s nonsense.

Similarly, Google has also chosen its side, or has perhaps been overtaken by Social Justice Warriors who force Google to be ‘on the right side of history’:

auto-fill for “Islam is” in Dutch Google:

  • beautiful
  • peace
  • peace
  • a religion of peace

Auto-fill for “Islam is” in Dutch Bing:

  • a lie
  • bad
  • shrinking
  • beautiful

Censorship does not get more obvious than that.

As a bonus, Christianity auto-fill.

Left vs right II: shitpoasting

So this was supposed to be a blogpost trilogy. And I’m pretty sure I had something for this. I just forgot what. Something something leftist scum something. Whatever. All my good memes are in the first post of the series.  Best Of The Week material if you ask me, if only there were such an award to be handed out by the internet! Unlike this post, which will be improvised shitpoasting.

I have found that leftists cheat at games. Literally. Try play a board game with friends. Watch the leftist among them cheat. It’s DNA baby.

The guy behind r/K-selection theory, Anonymous Conservative, impresses me with his writing quantity. 2-3 posts a day! I read his book a while ago. Enjoyed it. I am also convinced that leftism and rightism are genetic and can be traced neurologically. I am however less convinced that r/K theory explains it all. Too many holes in the theory as it is. My main issue is leftists are supposedly like rabbits so they have lots of children – but they don’t, they substitute kids with cats. In fact per stereotype K-selected Christian families are having lots of children. Nigerians are having lots of kids, but if r-selection is adaption to abundance of resources how come Nigerians in scarce-resource Africa are not K-selected like the lions with which they share their continent? I dunno, the comparison wrings on a couple of levels. For the moment it works better as a fable.

Why lions eat rabbits

Once upon a time a strong lion lived with his family on the countryside. The lion took good care of the land, so his cubs were healthy and well-fed. One day a family of rabbits moved in next door. The friendly lion went to greet father rabbit and said to him: ‘you seem friendly, but how do I know you will not steal the food of my land?’ The rabbit reassured him: ‘oh powerful lion, you are so much stronger than I am, how could I dare steal your food?’ The lion was satisfied.

Yet as time passed food started disappearing. The lion went to the rabbit and said: ‘are you stealing my food?’ ‘of course not!’ replied the rabbit. ‘There is however a fox roaming the countryside. Perhaps he stole your food!’ The lion, feeling bad for blaming the rabbit, apologised and left.

But more and more food disappeared from the land. The lion’s cubs grew ill. The lion, seeing the rabbit’s family had grown explosively, angrily went back to the rabbit and said to him: ‘my children are weak with hunger. I have never seen this fox you talk about, yet I have seen the full bellies of your children.’ The rabbit was shocked to hear of the lion’s misfortune and doubled down on his claim that this dirty fox is the culprit. He showed the lion a red herring with bitemarks — ‘these bitemarks belong to the fox!’ said the rabbit. The lion, not knowing how to deal with this piece of ‘evidence’, told the rabbit to leave his land alone.

But the food shortage continued and one day one of the lion’s cubs died. This was the final straw that broke the lion’s back; he rushed to the rabbit’s hole, only to find that all the rabbits had fled.

And that is why lions eat rabbits.

The cape and the matador

Coldplay has a new song out. It is a pro-immigration song.

I like the song. Reminds me of old Coldplay. Clip is also pretty.

Of course Chris Martin has completely lost whatever shred of dignity he probably never had; can you sing ‘Sell-Out Traitor Lowlife’ with me? Chris Martin is British so he is aware of the shitstorm that is England. But no doubt Chris lives in America in a big mansion with a beautiful wall around it and the money he makes with pro-immigration music allows him to upgrade his wall should the need ever mysteriously arise. In short: his vapid signalling towards his 90% female fanbase goes unpunished, actually rewards him.

Which does not excuse the scumminess of it all. We all know why the above song is so appealing to females: every single girl dreams of her own rapefugee. The better dressed-up the fantasy, the easier she can indulge in it. Chris Martin obliges by dressing up the fantasy in a family-friendly fable of young men escaping evil worms.

Nietzsche talked about the need to respect your enemies. I respect this song because it is  the only Coldplay song post-A Rush of Blood to the Head that is worth listening to more than once. However, Jim talks about distinguishing between the matador and the cape. Coldplay is the cape, not the matador. Coldplay has clearly been steered by the matador into promoting immigration, or more specifically, would never have been as popular had Chris Martin not signalled his willingness to be steered by the matador.

We see the artist cape reflected in its rightist opposite, e.g. Pewdiepie red-pilling millions of viewers on the wage gap myth.

Seems to me Pewdiepie is signalling his willingness to be steered by rightist matadors. Unfortunately very few such matadors in power. Perhaps president Trump can RTWT a Pewdiepie video?

Left vs Right I: etymology

Life is complex, but life is also simple. Dualistic. It seems thinkers of our time have settled on two main terms to describe the divide that splits the modern world: right and left.

Before we get into the theorising let us take a look at the etymology. In their original meanings left and right are instinctive words, yet hard to explain. Your left is simply, on your left. The side of your body where your heart lays. Your right is the opposite side, housing your liver. Left and right are coordinates for navigating your environment, similar to directions on a compass, but more primal.

The origin of the political left and right stems from the French revolution. In 1791 French revolutionaries rewrote the French constitution such that the old legislative body was stripped of its power. In its place came a new body, the Legislative Assembly, in which the revolutionaries enjoyed all the power.

Now, because the Legislative Assembly was brand new, fresh traditions were shaped every other day. On such tradition was the observation that there were two opposing groups in the Assembly: the group on the literal right side favoured a constitutional monarchy, felt things had escalated far enough. The group on the literal left side wanted the king dead, were in favour of more evermore equality and fraternity. Of course the conservatives lost, the Jacobins won and France endured all the lovely perks of having leftists in power.

Screen Shot 2017-07-08 at 12.55.48

So that’s it for origin stories. On to the good stuff. Why is the right/left divide so accurate? Because nature is dualistic. Every organism has 2 choices: to cooperate or to defect. Life in many ways is a never-ending series of prisoner’s dilemmas, a constant choice between working together with others or screwing others over. Eve cooperated with Adam until she defected on him. The choice turns out to be so fundamental to our survival that we’ve come to genetically specialise in one or the other. Rightism is cooperating, leftism is defecting.

Let there be no surprise that leftists categorically deny this label. In their defence, our definition pretty much puts them in a position where we are asking them how long they’ve been beating their wives, so they are in a bad position to defend themselves. But the truth speaks for itself, and the truth shouts that leftists by nature are defectors.

For cuttlefish, there are 2 main mating strategies. The first is to adhere to the mating ritual, which fighting other males for dominance (co-op/co-op). The strongest male gets to mate. This is good for the species, not so much for the weaker male. So many males employ an alternative mating strategy: pose as a female and sneak past the strong males (co-op/defect). If the bluff is successful, the weak male mates. Bad for the species, good for the weak male.

This in a nutshell is leftism vs rightism. The rightist wants to co-operate because he knows he is strong and he has the most to gain with all-around honesty (it is probably correct that the rightist does not care about what is good for civilisation either, that any boon to civilisation is merely a side-effect of his personal preference to play it straight). The leftist wants to defect because he knows he is outmatched in straightforward co-operation. The rightist builds the system, the leftist games the system.

Trump has the frame

Communicating in memes is cool. Powerful people communicating in powerful memes is the coolest.

Leftists bash Trump for tweeting about the media when he is supposed to do important stuff. But tweeting about the media is important stuff. People need meaning, the media gives meaning by showing us what movie we’re watching. Right now their movie is called: Kill All White Males.

Frame is all, but the frame giveth, the frame taketh. Without an external means of shutting down the media the only way to beat the media is to steal their frame. Out-alfa the alpha; show everyone who is boss.

And Trump is showing the media who is boss. He has the numbers to back him up; CNN ratings keep going down, Trump’s twitter keeps going up. Trump is changing the movie we’re watching. It is now titled: #MAGA.

The below clip reaffirms the point. See how easily Bossert outframes the journalist:

TrumpenTrooper: “President Trump is so genuine.”
Journalist woman: “Some journalists had to get private security guards, is that fair?”
TrumpenTrooper: “President Trump isn’t just genuine, he also brilliantly bypasses cable networks through social media.”

In the old movie, the journalist in an obnoxiously concerned tone demands Trump be outranked by the media which in turn is outranked by the progressive elite which plans to Kill All White Males. In the new movie, no one takes the journalist seriously. MAGA!