tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5723053928055808211.post3030142409739919944..comments2019-08-18T02:19:53.113-07:00Comments on Finding Count St.Germain: Who is Andreas Rill? What Have I Dug Up?Jessiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02148517912341316108noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5723053928055808211.post-10879459630567634132017-01-23T13:39:54.604-08:002017-01-23T13:39:54.604-08:00Here is Hans Bender&#39;s article. http://www.art-...Here is Hans Bender&#39;s article. http://www.art-paint.ch/vigil/Bilder/HansBender-Feldpostbriefe_Teil1.pdf<br /><br />He is known to have been fooled by fakers (see Spuk in Rosenheim). <br />Also, the things he writes about the technical analysis of the letters translate to &quot;To answer the question whether the letter was made in the mentioned time [1914] was not possible. But there also were no indications of forgery&quot;. <br />Which isn&#39;t a very hard proof for authenticity.<br />My thoughts are that a lot of the things written in those letters wouldn&#39;t have gotten through censorship in WWI (Germany losing WWI, the monarchy stops to exist). <br /><br />The monastery (http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b102172355) is now a monastery of Classises (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigolsheim#Monast.C3.A8re_des_Clarisses). Othismoshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02833982590121171174noreply@blogger.com