Adaptive Management of India’s Wildlife Sanctuaries

  • Paul RobbinsEmail author
  • Anil K. Chhangani


This chapter examines India’s wildlife sanctuaries as laboratories for understanding the nuanced relationship between science, democracy, and conservation. India’s 523 wildlife sanctuaries have been set aside by the Indian Wildlife Act for the purpose of conserving biodiversity and the natural heritage of the county. Amidst social and economic change, these sanctuaries face the threats of urban growth, agricultural encroachment, and exploitation by mining and timber extraction. Even so, these wildlife sanctuaries cannot be considered pristine or characterized by wilderness because they have been recently created and have long been influenced by people. The purpose of this essay is to investigate the Kumbhalgarh Wildlife Sanctuary in Rajasthan in detail to understand the intertwining relationship between new institutions and complex landscapes, thereby providing a scientific opportunity to enhance our understanding of conservation science. A close examination of this sanctuary suggests: (1) ecological transitions in the sanctuary are multidirectional, (2) extensive conservation resources reside outside the sanctuary, and (3) ecological knowledge resources are extensive and untapped. These results suggest an adaptive management approach is paramount, insofar as it would take advantage of the complex dynamics of reserves, as well as the inevitable human impact on the landscape and the considerable ecological knowledge possessed by local communities.


Wildlife reserve Human Impact Ecological knowledge Kumbhalgarh Political ecology 


  1. Arvai J, Bridge G, Dolsak N, Franzese R, Koontz T, Luginbuhl A, Robbins P, Richards K, Korfmacher KS, Sohngen B, Tansey J, Thompson A (2006) Adaptive management of the global climate problem: bridging the gap between climate research and climate policy. Clim Change 78(1):217–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chhangani AK (2000) Ecobehavioural diversity of langurs (Presbytes entellus) living in different ecosystems. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. J. N.V. University, JodhpurGoogle Scholar
  3. Chhangani AK, Robbins P, Mohnot SM (2008) Crop raiding and livestock predation at Kumbhalgarh Wildlife Sanctuary, Rajasthan, India. Hum Dimens Wildl 13(5):305–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chief Wildlife Warden Kumbhalgarh Wildlife Sanctuary (1996) Management plan: Kumbhalgarh Wildlife Sanctuary 1996–1997 to 2000–2001. Rajasthan Forest Service, UdaipurGoogle Scholar
  5. Holling CS (1978) Adaptive environmental assessment and management. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Irwin A (1995) Citizen science: a study of people, expertise, and sustainable development. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Karanth KK, Curran LM, Reuning-Scherer JD (2006) Village size and forest disturbance in Bhadra Wildlife Sanctuary, Western Ghats, India. Biol Conserv 128:147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lotka AJ (1925) Elements of physical biology. Williams & Wilkins, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  9. Parks SA, Harcourt AH (2002) Reserve size, local human density, and mammalian extinctions in U.S. protected areas. Conserv Biol 16:800–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ranganathan J, Daniels RJR, Chandran MDS, Ehrlich PR, Daily GC (2008) Sustaining biodiversity in ancient tropical countryside. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105(46):17852–17854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Robbins P (2000) The practical politics of knowing: state environmental knowledge and local political economy. Econ Geogr 76(2):126–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Robbins P, Chhangani AK, Rice J, Trigosa E, Mohnot SM (2007) Enforcement authority and vegetation change at Kumbhalgarh Wildlife Sanctuary, Rajasthan, India. Environ Manag 40(3):365–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Robbins P, McSweeney K, Chhangani AK, Rice JL (2009) Conservation as it is: illicit resource use in a wildlife reserve in India. Hum Ecol 37(5):559–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wittemyer G, Elsen P, Bean WTA, Burton CO, Brashares JS (2008) Accelerated human population growth at protected area edges. Science 321(5885):123–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Zimmerer KS (2000) The reworking of conservation geographies: nonequilibrium landscapes and nature-society hybrids. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 90(2):356–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zimmerer KS, Young KR (1998) Nature’s geography: new lessons for conservation in developing countries. University of Wisconsin Press, MadisonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nelson Institute of Environmental StudiesUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Environmental ScienceMaharaja Ganga Singh UniversityBikanerIndia

Personalised recommendations