I have two kids. We don't do contact sports, but some of our friends are involved in American football or hockey, and there's plenty of contact, but it seems like a game. Indeed over the course of my life, such sports have tended towards more game less violence through tweaking their rules. Wrestling seems definitively like a contest not based on violence. Boxing I have no defense for, but it's not part of my question.

I just witnessed my son's friend's dojo, and the weaponry and actions of the participants sickened me. Now it's possible I'm being a pansy, and the CCC allows for self defense, but it sure seemed the participants were leaving communion in their actions.

So, is there a formal statement regarding martial arts within Catholicism? Is there a line in which crossed one has sinned?

  • @Ken Graham. I would expect soldiers to be trained in hand-to-hand contact, weaponry, tactics, etc. It seems there is a moral difference between this and a 5 year old girl strapping on body padding, putting in a mouth guard, and whacking the tar out of someone with a stick. – Stu W Aug 28 '16 at 12:26
  • @KenGraham: The OP specified the [catholicism] tag, which, quite appropriately, narrows the question to Catholicism. The alternative is closing the question as too broad. – Flimzy Aug 28 '16 at 13:04
  • On July 1, 2014, Gainer introduced a new policy prohibiting girls at Catholic schools in the Diocese of Harrisburg from participating in wrestling, tackle football, and tackle rugby whether or not they desire to compete in girls-only or co-ed matches. The policy goes on to require male wrestlers to forfeit matches against female opponents, but does not bar tackle football or rugby teams from playing against teams which may have a girl on their team. According to the policy, the ban applies to sports "...that involve substantial and potentially immodest physical contact". – Ken Graham Aug 28 '16 at 15:44
  • @KenGraham: That should be in an answer. – Flimzy Aug 29 '16 at 7:02
  • @F Except that that comment covers "immodest physical contact" whereas the question is asking about armed combat (albeit with rules). However, the only way of training in self-defence is to be faced with what you need to defend yourself against. – Andrew Leach Aug 29 '16 at 7:48

On the Vatican website, Google finds one document which specifically references taekwondo.

It's the record of a General Audience given by Pope Benedict XVI on 9 April 2008, and the reference appears only in the Italian version (as it was a greeting directed to Italian speakers, after the main address):

Saluto gli atleti che partecipano ai campionati Europei di Taekwondo, incoraggiandoli a promuovere anche attraverso questa disciplina sportiva il rispetto per il prossimo e la lealtà.

I greet the athletes participating in the European Taekwondo Championships, encouraging them to promote the sport through the respect for others and loyalty.

Original in Italian

The Catechism of the Catholic Church has two entries for "Violence: force" in its index, and none for "self-defence" or "martial arts":



103 Gaudium et Spes 78 § 5

Earlier paragraphs (ibid.) do mention anger and hatred:



2303 Deliberate hatred is contrary to charity. Hatred of the neighbour is a sin when one deliberately wishes him evil. Hatred of the neighbour is a grave sin when one deliberately desires him grave harm. "But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven."96

93 Matthew 5:21
94 Summa Theologica II-II 158 1 ad 3
95 Matthew 5:22
96 Matthew 5:44-45

Thus, [to answer the question about a line crossed] to the extent that martial arts do not involve anger or hatred, they are not contrary to the moral law. Practising and training in them involves skill, and it is training for self-defence; dojos are also places of absolute authority and detailed rules, mirroring what might be expected in life. Pope Benedict expressed this in his remarks about respect and loyalty.

Your Answer

