%0 Journal Article %A de Paz, Alexia Martínez %A Khajavi, Leila %A Martin, Hélène %A Claveria-Gimeno, Rafael %A Dieck, Susanne tom %A Cheema, Manjinder S. %A Sanchez-Mut, Jose V. %A Moksa, Malgorzata M. %A Carles, Annaick %A Brodie, Nick I. %A Sheikh, Taimoor I. %A Freeman, Melissa E. %A Petrotchenko, Evgeniy V. %A Borchers, Christoph H. %A Schuman, Erin M. %A Zytnicki, Matthias %A Velazquez-Campoy, Adrian %A Abian, Olga %A Hirst, Martin %A Esteller, Manel %A Vincent, John B. %A Malnou, Cécile E. %A Ausió, Juan %T MeCP2-E1 isoform is a dynamically expressed, weakly DNA-bound protein with different protein and DNA interactions compared to MeCP2-E2 %D 2018 %R 10.1101/392092 %J bioRxiv %P 392092 %X MeCP2 – a chromatin-binding protein associated with Rett syndrome – has two main isoforms, MeCP2-E1 and MeCP2-E2, with 96% amino acid identity differing in a few N-terminal amino acid residues. Previous studies have shown brain region-specific expression of these isoforms which, in addition to their different cellular localization and differential expression during brain development, suggest they may also have non-overlapping molecular mechanisms. However, differential functions of MeCP2-E1 and E2 remain largely unexplored. Here, we show that the N-terminal domains (NTD) of MeCP2-E1 and E2 modulate the ability of the methyl binding domain (MBD) to interact with DNA as well as influencing the turnover rates, binding dynamics, response to nuclear depolarization, and circadian oscillations of the two isoforms. Our proteomics data indicate that both isoforms exhibit unique interacting protein partners. Moreover, genome-wide analysis using ChIP-seq provide evidence for a shared as well as a specific regulation of different sets of genes. Our findings provide insight into the functional complexity of MeCP2 by dissecting differential aspects of its two isoforms.Significance Whether the two E1 and E2 isoforms of MeCP2 have different structural and/or functional implications has been highly controversial and is not well known. Here we show that the relatively short N-terminal sequence variation between the two isoforms impinges them with an important DNA binding difference. Moreover, MeCP2-E1 and E2 exhibit a different cellular dynamic behavior and have some distinctive interacting partners. In addition, while sharing genome occupancy they specifically bind to several distinctive genes.AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONSAMdP and JA designed and wrote the paper. AMdP, MSC, HM, CM, MEF and TIS performed the biochemical/molecular biology experiments, RC-G, OA and AV-C designed and performed the calorimetry and spectroscopy experiments, MMM provided assistance with construction of the ChIP libraries, NIB and EVP carried out the proteomic analyses, LK, MZ and AC conducted the bioinformatic analyses of the CHIP-seq data, STD and EMS performed the immunofluorescence, JVS-M, MZ, AV-C, JBV, MH, ME and CM contributed to the writing and discussion of specific sections of the manuscript. %U https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2018/08/17/392092.full.pdf