









You might be referring to the concept of דברי סופרים צריכים חיזוק. This means that we are more stringent with regard to rabbinic laws. This would sound as a direct contradiction to the famous rule that we don't mage a Gezeira to a Gezeira.

To answer this we must understand the idea of not making a Gezeira for a Gezeira (a fence of a fence) and Safek Derabanan Lekula (when in doubt about a rabbinic law we take the lenient approach). The function of these rabbinic rulings are as fences. Therefore they aren't inherently wrong. For this reason there is no Gezeira protecting you from the possibility of transgressing the rabbinic law. However, we are very much protective of the law being kept and not being taken lightly.

To illustrate this point, if there is a deep cliff near a school the responsible authorities would erect a strong, tall fence to keep people from landing up at the cliff. Now, if the fence got moved there would be no urgency to put it back at its original spot. The spot is arbitrary. It is there merely to make sure nobody lands up at the cliff. Likewise, there won't be any kind of protection from those who manage to reach under and over the fence. We won't either be implementing safeguards to make sure that absolutely nobody ends up by mistake on the other side of this fence, since that is not what bothers us — as long as the marked area is observed.

On the other hand, anyone tampering with the fence itself or trying to sneak through it would surely be stopped in his tracks. There is no doubt that this person is endangering himself and others by doing away with this fence.

The same applies for rabbinic laws. They might have created more stringencies to express the importance of keeping up the validity of these fences in general, but at individual cases we understand that it is not the spot near the fence that is being protected and that that is not what we came to avoid.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .