Bulletin of Volcanology

, Volume 51, Issue 2, pp 88–95 | Cite as

A dynamical model of lava flows cooling by radiation

  • Michele Dragoni


The behaviour of a lava flow is reproduced by a two-dimensional model of a Bingham liquid flowing down a uniform slope. Such a liquid is described by two rheological parameters, yield stress and viscosity, both of which are strongly temperature-dependent. Assuming a flow rate and an initial temperature of the liquid at the eruption vent, the temperature decrease due to heat radiation and the consequent change in the rheological parameters are computed along the flow. Both full thermal mixing and thermal unmixing are considered. The equations of motion are solved analytically in the approximation of a slow downslope change of the flow parameters. Flow height and velocity are obtained as functions of the distance from the eruption vent; the time required for a liquid element to reach a certain distance from the vent is also computed. The gross features of observed lava flows are reproduced by the model which allows us to estimate the sensitivity of flow dynamics to changes in the initial conditions, ground slope and rheological parameters. A pronounced increase in the rate of height increase and velocity decrease is found when the flow enters the Bingham regime. The results confirm the observation according to which lava flows show an initial rapid advance, followed by a marked deceleration, while the final length of a flow is such that the Graetz number is in the order of a few hundreds.


Heat Radiation Sedimentology Lava Flow Flow Dynamic Rheological Parameter 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Archambault C, Tanguy JC (1976) Comparative temperature measurements on Mount Etna lavas: problems and techniques. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 1:113–125Google Scholar
  2. Baloga S, Pieri D (1986) Time-dependent profiles of lava flows. J Geophys Res 91:9543–9552Google Scholar
  3. Borgia A, Linneman S, Spencer D, Morales LD, Andre JB (1983) Dynamics of lava flow fronts, Arenal Volcano, Costa Rica. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 19:303–329Google Scholar
  4. Daneš ZF (1972) Dynamics of lava flows. J Geophys Res 77:1430–1432Google Scholar
  5. Dragoni M, Bonafede M, Boschi E (1986) Downslope flow models of a Bingham liquid: implications for lava flows. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 30:305–325Google Scholar
  6. Emerman SH, Turcotte DL (1983) A fluid model for the shape of accretionary wedges. Earth Planet Sci Lett 63:379–384Google Scholar
  7. Hulme G (1974) The interpretation of lava flow morphology. Geophys JR Astr Soc 39:361–383Google Scholar
  8. Hulme G (1982) A review of lava flow processes related to the formation of lunar sinuous rilles. Geophys Surv 5:245–279Google Scholar
  9. Hulme G, Fielder G (1977) Effusion rates and rheology of lunar lavas. Phil Trans R Soc A285:227–234Google Scholar
  10. Huppert HE (1982) Flow and instability of a viscous current down a slope. Nature 300:427–429Google Scholar
  11. Johnson AM (1970) Physical processes in geology. Freeman-Cooper, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnson AM, Pollard DD (1973) Mechanics of growth of some laccolithic intrusions in the Henry Mountains, Utah, I. Tectonophysics 18:261–309Google Scholar
  13. Landau L, Lifchitz E (1971) Méchanique des fluides. Éditions MIR, Moscow, pp 670Google Scholar
  14. Lockwood JP, Banks NG, English TT, Greenland LP, Jackson DB, Johnson DJ, Koyanagi RY, McGee KA, Okamura AT, Rhodes JM (1985) The 1984 eruption of Mauna Loa Volcano, Hawaii. Eos 66:169–171Google Scholar
  15. Malin MC (1980) Lengths of Hawaiian lava flows. Geology 8:306–308Google Scholar
  16. McBirney AR, Murase T (1984) Rheological properties of magmas. Ann Rev Earth Planet Sci 12:337–357Google Scholar
  17. McBirney AR, Noyes RM (1979) Crystallization layering of the Skaergaard intrusion. J Petrol 20:487–554Google Scholar
  18. Murase T, McBirney AR (1970) Viscosity of lunar lavas. Science 167:1491–1493Google Scholar
  19. Park S, Iversen JD (1984) Dynamics of lava flow: thickness growth characteristics of steady two-dimensional flow. Geophys Res Lett 11:641–644Google Scholar
  20. Pieri DC, Baloga SM (1986) Eruption rate, area and length relationships for some Hawaiian lava flows, J Volcanol Geotherm Res 30:29–45Google Scholar
  21. Pinkerton H, Sparks RSJ (1976) The 1975 sub-terminal lavas, Mount Etna: a case history of the formation of a compound lava field. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 1:167–182Google Scholar
  22. Pinkerton H, Sparks RSJ (1978) Field measurements of the rheology of lava. Nature 276:383–385Google Scholar
  23. Robson GR (1967) Thickness of Etnean lavas. Nature 216:251–252Google Scholar
  24. Scarfe CM (1973) Viscosity of basic magmas at varying pressure. Nature 241:101–102Google Scholar
  25. Shaw HR (1969) Rheology of basalt in the melting range. J Petrol 10:510–534Google Scholar
  26. Shaw HR, Wright TL, Peck DL, Okamura R (1968) The viscosity of basaltic magma: an analysis of field measurements in Makaopuhi Lava Lake, Hawaii. Am J Sci 266:225–264Google Scholar
  27. Skelland AHP (1967) Non-newtonian flow and heat transfer. Wiley, New York, pp 469Google Scholar
  28. Sparks RSJ, Pinkerton H (1978) Effect of degassing on rheology of basaltic lava. Nature 276:385–386Google Scholar
  29. Sparks RSJ, Pinkerton H, Hulme G (1976) Classification and formation of lava levees on Mount Etna, Sicily. Geology 4:269–271Google Scholar
  30. Spera FJ, Yuen DA, Kirschvink SJ (1982) Thermal boundary layer convection in silicic magma chambers: effects of temperature-dependent rheology and implications for thermo-gravitational chemical fractionation. J Geophys Res 87:8755–8767Google Scholar
  31. Wadge G (1978) Effusion rate and the shape of aa lava flow-fields on Mount Etna. Geology 6:503–506Google Scholar
  32. Walker GPL (1967) Thickness and viscosity of Etnean lavas. Nature 213:484–485Google Scholar
  33. Walker GPL (1973) Lengths of lava flows, Philos. Trans R Soc A 274:107–118Google Scholar
  34. Wilson L, Head JW III (1983) A comparison of volcanic eruption processes on Earth, Moon, Mars, Io and Venus. Nature 302:663–669Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michele Dragoni
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di FisicaUniversità di BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations