Open main menu

The South Pole–Aitken basin is an impact crater on the far side of the Moon. At roughly 2,500 km (1,600 mi) in diameter and 13 km (8.1 mi) deep, it is one of the largest known impact craters in the Solar System. It is the largest, oldest, and deepest basin recognized on the Moon.[1] It was named for two features on opposing sides: the crater Aitken on the northern end and the lunar south pole at the other end. The outer rim of this basin can be seen from Earth as a huge chain of mountains located on the Moon's southern limb, sometimes informally called "Leibnitz mountains".

South Pole–Aitken basin
Aitken Kagu big.jpg
Topographic map of the South Pole–Aitken basin based on Kaguya data. Red represents high elevation, purple represents low elevation. The purple and grey elliptical rings trace the inner and outer walls of the basin. (The black ring is an old artifact of the image.)
Coordinates53°S 169°W﻿ / ﻿53°S 169°W﻿ / -53; -169Coordinates: 53°S 169°W﻿ / ﻿53°S 169°W﻿ / -53; -169
DiameterAbout 2,500 km (1,600 mi)
DepthAbout 13 km (8.1 mi)
EponymLunar south pole
Aitken (crater)

On 3 January 2019, the Chang'e 4, a Chinese spacecraft, landed in the basin,[2] specifically within a crater called Von Kármán.[3]




The existence of a giant far side basin was suspected as early as 1962 based on early probe images (namely Luna 3 and Zond 3), but it was not until the acquisition of global photography by the Lunar Orbiter program in the mid-1960s that geologists recognized its true size. Laser altimeter data obtained during the Apollo 15 and 16 missions showed that the northern portion of this basin was very deep,[4] but since these data were only available along the near-equatorial ground tracks of the orbiting command and service modules, the topography of the rest of the basin remained unknown. The geologic map showing the northern half of this basin and with its edge depicted was published in 1978 by the United States Geological Survey.[5] Little was known about the basin until the 1990s, when the spacecrafts Galileo and Clementine visited the Moon. Multispectral images obtained from these missions showed that this basin contains more FeO and TiO2 than typical lunar highlands,[citation needed] and hence has a darker appearance. The topography of the basin was mapped in its entirety for the first time using altimeter data and the analysis of stereo image pairs taken during the Clementine mission. Most recently, the composition of this basin has been further constrained by the analysis of data obtained from a gamma-ray spectrometer that was on board the Lunar Prospector mission.

Physical characteristicsEdit


The South Pole–Aitken basin is the largest, deepest and oldest basin recognized on the Moon.[1] The lowest elevations of the Moon (about −6000 m) are located within the South Pole–Aitken basin, and the highest peaks (about +8000 m) are found on this basin's north-eastern rim, which are sometimes called the Leibnitz Mountains.[6] Because of this basin's great size, the crust at this locale is expected to be thinner than typical as a result of the large amount of material that was excavated due to an impact. Crustal thickness maps constructed using the Moon's topography and gravity field imply a thickness of about 30 km beneath the floor of this basin, in comparison to 60–80 km around it and the global average of about 50 km.[7]

The composition of the basin, as estimated from the Galileo, Clementine, and Lunar Prospector missions, appears to be different from typical highland regions. Most importantly, none of the samples obtained from the American Apollo and Russian Luna missions, nor the handful of identified lunar meteorites, have comparable compositions. The orbital data indicate that the floor of the basin has slightly elevated abundances of iron, titanium, and thorium. In terms of mineralogy, the basin floor is much richer in clinopyroxene and orthopyroxene than the surrounding highlands, which are largely anorthositic.[8] Several possibilities exist for this distinctive chemical signature: one is that it might simply represent lower crustal materials that are somewhat more rich in iron, titanium and thorium than the upper crust; another is that the composition reflects the widespread distribution of ponds of iron-rich basalts, similar to those that make up the lunar maria; alternatively, the rocks in the basin could contain a component from the lunar mantle if the basin excavated all the way through the crust; and, finally, it is possible that a large portion of the lunar surface surrounding the basin was melted during the impact event, and differentiation of this impact melt sheet could have given rise to additional geochemical anomalies. Complicating the matter is the possibility that several processes have contributed to the basin's anomalous geochemical signature. Ultimately, the origin of the anomalous composition of the basin is not known with certainty and will likely require a sample return mission to determine.


A possible configuration of South Pole–Aitken basin sample return spacecraft

Simulations of near vertical impacts show that the bolide ought to have excavated vast amounts of mantle materials from depths as great as 200 km below the surface. However, observations thus far do not favor a mantle composition for this basin and crustal thickness maps seem to indicate the presence of about 10 kilometers of crustal materials beneath this basin's floor. This has suggested to some that the basin was not formed by a typical high-velocity impact, but may instead have been formed by a low-velocity projectile around 200 km in diameter that hit at a low angle (about 30 degrees or less), and hence did not dig very deeply into the Moon. Putative evidence for this comes from the high elevations north-east of the rim of the South Pole–Aitken basin that might represent ejecta from such an oblique impact. The impact theory would also account for magnetic anomalies on the Moon.[9]

See alsoEdit


Cited references

  1. ^ a b Petro, Noah E.; Pieters, Carle M. (2004-05-05), "Surviving the heavy bombardment: Ancient material at the surface of South Pole-Aitken Basin" (PDF), Journal of Geophysical Research, 109, Bibcode:2004JGRE..109.6004P, doi:10.1029/2003je002182
  2. ^ Lyons, Kate. "Chang'e 4 landing: China probe makes historic touchdown on far side of the moon". The Guardian. Retrieved 3 January 2019.
  3. ^ China's Journey to the Lunar Far Side: A Missed Opportunity? Paul D. Spudis, Air & Space Smithsonian. 14 June 2017.
  4. ^ W. M. Kaula; G. Schubert; R. E. Lingenfelter; W. L. Sjogren; et al. (1974). "Apollo laser altimetry and inferences as to lunar structure". Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 5: 3049–3058.
  6. ^ [Flashback Friday: "The Moon - So Far" in 1958]. Google Lunar X Price. Astiles, August 27, 2010.
  7. ^ Potter, R. W. K.; Collins, G. S.; Kiefer, W. S.; McGovern, P. J.; et al. (2012). "Constraining the size of the South Pole-Aitken basin impact" (PDF). Icarus. 220 (2): 730–743. Bibcode:2012Icar..220..730P. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2012.05.032. Archived from the original on December 21, 2014.CS1 maint: Unfit url (link)
  8. ^ P. Lucey; et al. (2006). "Understanding the lunar surface and space-Moon interactions". Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry. 60: 83–219. Bibcode:2006RvMG...60...83L. doi:10.2138/rmg.2006.60.2.
  9. ^ Wieczorek MA; Weiss BP; Stewart ST (2012). "An impactor origin for lunar magnetic anomalies". Science. 335 (6073): 1212–1215. Bibcode:2012Sci...335.1212W. doi:10.1126/science.1214773. PMID 22403388.

General references

External linksEdit