Posts tagged “Marxism

PODCAST — Refuting Anarchism, Marxism & All Revolutionary Thought – Jay Dyer (Half)

via Jay Dyer
Feb 11, 2017


Why Marxist Thought is Faulty, Obsolete and Serves Those in Power

Communist Party

Non-Aligned Media
Brandon Martinez
Sept. 4, 2014

In a heated dialogue on Facebook yesterday, Joshua Blakeney and I argued for some time with a belligerent, irrational, platitude-wielding communist.

Despite the individual in question mostly just spewing traditional Marxist venom at us—labeling us “Nazis,” “fascists,” “reactionaries” and other dirty words—some real insight about the inadequacy of Marxist ideology can be gleaned from the faulty thinking displayed by this misguided person.

The first false assertion of this Marxist and all those who espouse Marxist ideology (all Marxists make the same or similar claims because they are reading from a script provided to them by their gurus and have no original thoughts or analysis), is that the present world order is spearheaded by “WASPs,” i.e., rich white capitalists who adhere to a “white supremacist” ideology and seek to hold down and exploit those not part of the white in-group.

This all-pervasive “white supremacist” bogeyman lies at the core of Marxist discourse. In the Marxist worldview, all the ills of the world can be attributed to the “white supremacist capitalist class.”

This claim is not only obviously racist, but it is inaccurate.

Muslim immigrants in France occupy a whole street for prayer.
Muslim immigrants in France occupy a whole street for prayer.

If, as Marxists claim, “white supremacists” are at the helm of the global power structure today, then how do we explain the present policy of mass non-white immigration into all Western countries? Surely, if white racists controlled the immigration policy this wouldn’t be happening. How do we explain why most Western governments promote multiculturalism as a state ideology? How do we explain the “civil rights” movement in the United States which supposedly lifted blacks out of the shackles of oppression and discrimination in that country? How do we explain why the US government and other Western governments — again, supposedly dominated by “white racist capitalists” — have enacted massive social equalization programs (affirmative action, minority scholarship programs, etc.) that are designed to give minorities living in European-majority countries unfair advantages so as to artificially “equalize” society. If white racists hold the reins of power than why was the apartheid regime in South Africa overthrown with the consent and assistance of many Western governments? Why are scientists such as Philippe Rushton who have studied and published works on race and IQ hounded and harried and made into lepers in the academic community? Surely if white supremacists ran the show, academics such as Rushton would be celebrated and not traduced. The topic of race is a veritable taboo in Western societies, and even broaching the issue will result in one being branded a “racist” and even a “hate criminal.”

This false Marxist premise of white supremacist domination cannot stand up to scrutiny. The falsity of this Marxist meme is certainly a deliberate attempt to obfuscate the true nature of power today.

It is certainly true that whites were the dominant group in the world in the past three or four centuries, but it is not the case today and hasn’t been that way for many decades. The old WASP elite has been essentially dethroned and replaced by a hostile Jewish elite. This takeover process probably began at the beginning of the 20th century, and has been solidifying over the past 40 or so years. This new Jewish ruling class, as Joshua Blakeney has noted, cynically used the human rights struggles of blacks, Amerindians, and other minorities to discredit white gentiles who Jews sought to supplant as a competitor group. (See The Culture of Critique by Kevin MacDonald) It is this new Jewish faction that is highly dominant today in the global economy and by extension global politics.

This is a fact that Marxists seek to suppress. Marxists are essentially fighting a long-vanquished bogeyman, and therefore cannot come to terms with the reality of Jewish power.

But why do they do this?

To understand this it must be said that Marxism was, at its core, a Jewish strategy of self-empowerment. It was created and fostered by Jewish ideologues as a mechanism of unseating Gentile rulers and overturning Gentile political systems. Communism has operated as little more than a vehicle for Jewish power, and that is its function. Communism stems from the Jewish totalitarian tradition, which is why so many of its ideological forebearers were Jews with rabbinical roots (i.e., Moses Hess, Karl Marx, Rosa Luxenbourg, Leon Trotsky (Bronstein), Ana Pauker (Rabinsohn), etc.)

Communism in practice was the act of enslaving Gentiles under a tyrannical Jewish dictatorship. It was in a sense a historical re-creation of the Jewish ghetto (shtetl) where authoritarian rabbis had complete control over all aspects of Jewish life. Instead of rabbis controlling Jewish life, communist states enforced their rigid doctrines on the Gentile masses. Those who refused to obey the self-appointed overseers of society were summarily shot or exiled to concentration camps. This was especially true in the Soviet Union and communist Eastern Europe where “anti-Semitism” was decreed a crime punishable by death or imprisonment.


VIDEO — The Truth About Karl Marx

Stefan Molyneux
Jan 11, 2014

Karl Heinrich Marx is known as a German philosopher, economist and revolutionary socialist. How did the man who railed against economic and sexual exploitation treat those around him? What is the truth about Karl Marx?

Order “Intellectuals” by Paul Johnson here: http://www.fdrurl.com/Intellectuals-B…


Bitcoin Address: 1Fd8RuZqJNG4v56rPD1v6rgYptwnHeJRWs
Litecoin Address: LL76SbNek3dT8bv2APZNhWgNv3nHEzAgKT


Marx was a child of his time, the mid-nineteenth century, and Marxism was a characteristic nineteenth-century philosophy in that it claimed to be scientific. ‘Scientific’ was Marx’s strongest expression of approval, which he habitually used to distinguish himself from his many enemies. He and his work were ‘scientific’; they were not. He felt he had found a scientific explanation of human behaviour in history akin to Darwin’s theory of evolution.


Seems to have been a passionate Christian.

For a few years, in the 1860s and 1870s, he was again involved in revolutionary politics, running the International Working Men’s Association. But most of his time in London, until his death on 14 March 1883 — that is, thirty-four years — was spent in the British Museum, finding material for a gigantic study of capital, and trying to get it into publishable shape. He saw one volume through the press (1867) but the second and third were compiled from his notes by his colleague Friedrich Engels and published after his death.

He began writing poetry as a boy, around two main themes: his love for the girl next door, Jenny von Westphalen, of Prussian — Scotch descent, whom he married in 1841; and world destruction. He wrote a great deal of poetry, three manuscript volumes of which were sent to Jenny, were inherited by their daughter Laura and vanished after her death in 1911.

They were entitled ‘Savage Songs’, and savagery is a characteristic note of his verse, together with intense pessimism about the human condition, hatred, a fascination with corruption and violence, suicide pacts and pacts with the devil. ‘We are chained, shattered, empty, frightened/ Eternally chained to this marble block of being,’ wrote the young Marx , ‘… We are the apes of a cold God.’ He has himself, in the person of God, say: ‘I shall howl gigantic curses at mankind,’ and below the surface of much of his poetry is the notion of a general world-crisis building up. 4 He was fond of quoting Mephistopheles’ line from Goethe’s Faust, ‘Everything that exists deserves to perish’;

He found it in his hatred of usury and moneylenders, a passionate feeling directly related (as we shall see) to his own money difficulties.

Hegel’s followers were all in varying degrees anti-Semitic, and in 1843 Bruno Bauer, the anti-Semitic leader of the Hegelian left, published an essay demanding that the Jews abandon Judaism completely. Marx’s essays were a reply to this. He did not object to Bauer’s anti-Semitism; indeed he shared it, endorsed it and quoted it with approval. But he disagreed with Bauer’s solution. Marx rejected Bauer’s belief that the anti-social nature of the Jew was religious in origin and could be remedied by tearing the Jew away from his faith. In Marx’s opinion, the evil was social and economic. He wrote: ‘Let us consider the real Jew. Not the Sabbath Jew … but the everyday Jew.’ What , he asked, was ‘the profane basis of Judaism? Practical need, self-interest. What is the worldly cult of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly god? Money.’ The Jews had gradually spread this ‘practical’ religion to all society:

Amazon US Affiliate Link: http://www.fdrurl.com/AmazonUS
Amazon Canada Affiliate Link: http://www.fdrurl.com/AmazonCanada
Amazon UK Affiliate Link: http://www.fdrurl.com/AmazonUK

Stefan Molyneux’s Social Media
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/stefan.molyneux
Twitter: https://twitter.com/stefanmolyneux
Google+: https://www.google.com/+StefanMolyneu…
Linked In: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/stefan-mo…

Freedomain Radio Social Media
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Official.Fre…
Twitter: https://twitter.com/freedomainradio
Google+: https://www.google.com/+Freedomainrad…
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/company/freed…

Message Board: http://board.freedomainradio.com
Meet-Up Groups: http://www.meetup.com/Freedomain-Radio/
Blogspot: http://freedomain.blogspot.com/
iTunes Podcasts: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/f…

VIDEO — Frankfurt School Cultural Marxism Part 2 – Neil Sanders

May 22, 2013

Neither the left nor the right

[part 1]

VIDEO — Frankfurt School Cultural Marxism Part 1 Neil Sanders

May 15, 2013

Neither the left nor the right

Marx Was A Satanist (video)

YouTube – amy2x
November 7, 2010