Wolfram Brenner for giving us access to the complete micro-array

Wolfram Brenner for giving us access to the complete micro-array data of his study (Brenner et al. 2005). Open Access This article is distributed under

the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. Electronic supplementary material Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary material 1 (DOC 211 kb) References Andersen CL, Jensen selleck chemical JL, Orntoft TF (2004) Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer Res 64:5245–5250CrossRefPubMed Beck CF (2005) Signalling pathways from the chloroplast to the nucleus. Planta 222:743–756CrossRefPubMed Beinsberger SE, Clijsters HM, Valcke RL, Van Onckelen HA (1992) Morphological characteristics and phytohormone content of ipt-transgenic tobacco. In: Karssen CM, Van Loon LC, Vreugdenhil D (eds) Progress in plant growth regulation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 738–745 Bieleski RL (1964) The problem of halting enzyme action when extracting plant tissues. Anal Biochem 9:431–442CrossRefPubMed Brenner WG, Romanov GA, Köllmer I, Bürkle L, Schmülling T (2005) Immediate-early and delayed cytokinin response genes of Arabidopsis thaliana identified

by genome-wide expression profiling reveal OSI-906 clinical trial novel cytokinin-sensitive processes and suggest cytokinin action AMN-107 purchase through transcriptional cascades. Plant J 44:314–333CrossRefPubMed Bustin SA (2000) Absolute quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays. J Mol Endocrinol 25:169–193CrossRefPubMed Chernyad′ev II (2000) Ontogenetic changes in the photosynthetic apparatus and effects of cytokinins (review). Appli Biochem Microbiol 36(6):527–539CrossRef

Covshoff S, Majeran W, Liu O, Kolkman JM, van Wijk KJ, Brutnell TP (2008) Deregulation of maize C4 photosynthetic Decitabine nmr development in a mesophyll cell-defective mutant. Plant Physiol 146(4):1469–1481CrossRefPubMed Czechowski T, Stitt M, Altmann T, Udvardi MK, Scheibe W-R (2005) Genome-wide identification and testing of superior reference genes for transcript normalisation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 139:5–17CrossRefPubMed Dean JD, Goodwin PH, Hsiang T (2002) Comparison of relative RT-PCR and northern blot analyses to measure expression of β-1, 3-glucanase in Nicotiana benthamiana infected with Colletotrichum destructivum. Plant Mol Biol Rep 20:347–356CrossRef Demarsy E, Courtois F, Azevedo J, Buhot L, Lerbs-Mache S (2006) Building up of the plastid transcriptional machinery during germination and early plant development. Plant Physiol 142(3):993–1003CrossRefPubMed Durnford DG, Falkowski PG (1997) Chloroplast redox regulation of nuclear gene transcription during photoacclimation.

Appl Environ Microbiol 2006,72(5):3788–3792 PubMedCrossRef 38 Co

Appl Environ Microbiol 2006,72(5):3788–3792.PubMedCrossRef 38. Costa D, Poeta P, Saenz Y, Vinue

L, Rojo-Bezares B, Jouini A, Zarazaga M, Rodrigues J, Torres C: Detection of Escherichia coli harbouring extended-spectrum beta-lactamases of the G418 datasheet CTX-M, TEM and SHV classes in faecal samples of wild animals in Portugal. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006,58(6):1311–1312.PubMedCrossRef 39. Saenz Y, Brinas L, Dominguez E, Ruiz J, Zarazaga M, Vila J, Torres C: Mechanisms of resistance in multiple-antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli strains of human, animal, and food origins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004,48(10):3996–4001.PubMedCrossRef 40. v. Wintzingerode F, Göbel UB, Stackebrandt E: Determination of microbial diversity in environmental samples: pitfalls of PCR-based rRNA analysis. FEMS Microbiol Rev 1997,21(3):213–229.CrossRef 41. Strirling I, Spencer C, Andriashek D: Immobilization of polar bears ( Ursus maritimus ) with

Telazol R in the Canadian Arctic. J Wildl Dis 1989, 25:159–168. 42. Cole JR, Chai B, Marsh TL, Farris RJ, Wang Q, Kulam SA, Chandra S, McGarrell DM, Schmidt TM, Garrity GM, et al.: The selleckchem Ribosomal Database Project (RDP-II): previewing a new autoaligner that allows regular updates and the new prokaryotic taxonomy. Nucl Acids Res 2003,31(1):442–443.PubMedCrossRef 43. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ: Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucl Acids Res 1997,25(17):3389–3402.PubMedCrossRef 44. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA4: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 2007,24(8):1596–1599.PubMedCrossRef Capmatinib 45. Felsenstein J: Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985,39(4):783–791.CrossRef 46. Stackebrandt E, Goebel

BM: Taxonomic note: a place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1994,44(4):846–849.CrossRef 47. Shannon C, Weaver W: The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, USA; 1949. 48. Chao A: Non-parametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scand J Stat 1984, 11:783–791. IKBKE 49. Yu Y, Breitbart M, McNairnie P, Rohwer F: FastGroupII: A web-based bioinformatics platform for analyses of large 16S rDNA libraries. BMC Bioinformatics 2006,7(1):57–65.PubMedCrossRef 50. Good IJ: The population frequencies of species and the estimation of population parameters. Biometrika Trust 1953,40(3/4):237–264.CrossRef 51. Glad T, Klingenberg C, Flaegstad T, Ericson JU, Olsvik Ø: Rapid detection of the methicillin-resistance gene, mec A, in coagulase-negative staphylococci. Scand J Infect Dis 2001,33(7):502–506.PubMedCrossRef 52. Ehlers B, Strauch E, Goltz M, Kubsch D, Wagner H, Maidhof H, Bendiek J, Appel B, Buhk HJ: Nachweis gentechnischer Veränderungen in Mais mittels PCR.

Chen C, Ridzon DA, Broomer AJ, Zhou

Chen C, Ridzon DA, Broomer AJ, Zhou see more Z, Lee DH, Nguyen JT, Barbisin M, Xu NL, Mahuvakar VR, Andersen MR, et al.: AZD0156 clinical trial Real-time quantification of microRNAs by stem-loop RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33: e179.PubMedCrossRef 15. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods (San Diego, Calif) 2001, 25: 402–408. 16. Goodell MA, Brose K, Paradis G, Conner AS, Mulligan RC: Isolation and functional properties

of murine hematopoietic stem cells that are replicating in vivo. J Exp Med 1996, 183: 1797–1806.PubMedCrossRef 17. Haraguchi N, Utsunomiya T, Inoue H, Tanaka F, Mimori K, Barnard GF, Mori M: Characterization of a side population of cancer cells CHIR-99021 clinical trial from human gastrointestinal system. Stem Cells 2006, 24: 506–513.PubMedCrossRef 18. Shimano K, Satake M, Okaya A, Kitanaka J, Kitanaka N, Takemura M, Sakagami M, Terada N, Tsujimura T: Hepatic oval cells have the side population phenotype defined by expression of ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2/BCRP1. Am J Pathol 2003, 163: 3–9.PubMedCrossRef 19. Wulf GG, Luo KL, Jackson KA, Brenner MK, Goodell MA: Cells of the hepatic side population contribute to liver

regeneration and can be replenished with bone marrow stem cells. Haematologica 2003, 88: 368–378.PubMed 20. Kloosterman WP, Plasterk RH: The diverse functions of microRNAs in animal development and disease. Dev Cell 2006, 11: 441–450.PubMedCrossRef 21. Zhao Y, Samal E, Srivastava D: Serum response factor regulates a muscle-specific microRNA that targets Hand2 during cardiogenesis. Nature 2005, 436:

214–220.PubMedCrossRef 22. Lakshmipathy U, Hart RP: Concise review: MicroRNA expression in multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. Molecular motor Stem Cells 2008, 26: 356–363.PubMedCrossRef 23. He L, Thomson JM, Hemann MT, Hernando-Monge E, Mu D, Goodson S, Powers S, Cordon-Cardo C, Lowe SW, Hannon GJ, Hammond SM: A microRNA polycistron as a potential human oncogene. Nature 2005, 435: 828–833.PubMedCrossRef 24. Stadler BM, Ruohola-Baker H: Small RNAs: keeping stem cells in line. Cell 2008, 132: 563–566.PubMedCrossRef 25. Katoh H, Shibata T, Kokubu A, Ojima H, Loukopoulos P, Kanai Y, Kosuge T, Fukayama M, Kondo T, Sakamoto M, et al.: Genetic profile of hepatocellular carcinoma revealed by array-based comparative genomic hybridization: identification of genetic indicators to predict patient outcome. J Hepatol 2005, 43: 863–874.PubMedCrossRef 26. Sy SM, Wong N, Lai PB, To KF, Johnson PJ: Regional over-representations on chromosomes 1q, 3q and 7q in the progression of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Mod Pathol 2005, 18: 686–692.PubMedCrossRef 27. Calin GA, Ferracin M, Cimmino A, Di Leva G, Shimizu M, Wojcik SE, Iorio MV, Visone R, Sever NI, Fabbri M, et al.: A MicroRNA signature associated with prognosis and progression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 2005, 353: 1793–1801.PubMedCrossRef 28.

There is a second copy of spo0A in C thermocellum, Cthe_0812 whi

There is a second copy of spo0A in C. thermocellum, Cthe_0812 which is significantly downregulated by an unknown mechanism in standard conditions compared to the WT. The spo0A protein is activated when phosphorylated and has been shown to regulate sporulation in a number of clostridia [34]. Although, it is rare for C. thermocellum to go into sporulation, it has been shown that sporulation will occur under vitamin limitation, oxygen stress EPZ5676 purchase and switching between soluble and insoluble substrates [35]. The PM growth kinetics is consistent with other

spo0A defective mutants which continue to grow under nutrient limiting conditions [36–39]. The second reason for a reduction in the expression of sporulation genes may be that the PM differentially expresses the sigma factors that control p53 activator sporulation. The five known sporulation sigma factors

in B. subtilis are σE, σF, σG, σH and σK [31,34]. In B. subtilis, σH is the earliest sporulation sigma factor [34]. σE is the mother cell-specific sigma factor and is also involved in the synthesis of σK, the late-acting mother cell sigma factor [31]. Furthermore, σF – dependent transcription appears to be limited to the early expression of forespore-specific genes and σG appears to encode products that are synthesized within the forespore compartment during the later stages of sporulation to enhance spore survival and facilitate germination [31]. There are six genes that encode the various sporulation sigma factors in C. thermocellum. The PM has increased expression in σE (Cthe_0447) and σF (Cthe_0120), and decreased expression in σE (Cthe_0446) for the late-log time point, and decreased expression of σK (Cthe_1012) for both time points in the standard medium comparison (Table 1). The PM has increased expression of σE (Cthe_0447) and σF (Cthe_0120) for the mid-log time point and decreased expression of σK (Cthe_1012) for both time points in the MDV3100 nmr hydrolysate medium comparison (Table 1). A recent study of C.

acetobutylicum showed that σK is involved in both early and late sporulation [40]. In C. acetobutylicum sigK deletion blocks sporulation, prior to Spo0A expression and the mutant suffered from premature Rucaparib manufacturer cell death due to excessive medium acidification in batch cultures without pH control [40]. The sigK defective mutant did not transition into stationary phase where cells re-assimilate the acids and produce acetone, butanol, and ethanol [40]. The results suggest a positive-feedback loop between Spo0A and σK which may be the mechanism that down regulates Cthe_0812 for the PM in standard medium compared to the WT [40]. Sporulation is an energy intensive function requiring transcription of a large number of genes. By reducing the expression of certain sporulation genes, the PM may be capable of devoting more resources to growth. Furthermore, it has been shown that C.

Figure 3 Schematic representation of PS-QD micelles and evaluatio





46 5 17 1 65 1 85 3 74 5 98 3 31 [1 95] M3 0 64 0 36 0 5 0 7 0 76

46 5.17 1.65 1.85 3.74 5.98 3.31 [1.95] M3 0.64 0.36 0.5 0.7 0.76 1.42 0.73 [0.37] M4 0 0.12 0.08 0 0 0.27 0.08 [0.11] HP2 8.65 4.09 4.18 8.25 2.12 2.04 4.89 [2.9] Suma 10.75 9.74 6.41 10.8

6.62 9.71 9.01 [1.99] TRA 36.36 see more 36.08 36.53 34.77 32.83 43.1 36.61 [3.47]  0–168 hours TRA 42.16 50.69 45.26 40.44 43.11 51.11 45.46 [4.49]  0–EoCb TRA 47.6 57.93 48.26 40.44 47.86 51.93 49 [5.75] Feces (% excretion)  0–168 hours TRA 30.3 8.92 34.44 31.88 29.45 16.1 25.18 [10.22]  0–EoCb TRA 32.64 8.92 34.44 31.88 35.08 18.89 26.98 [10.67] Total (% excretion)  0–168 hours TRA 72.46 59.61 79.7 72.32 72.56 67.21 70.64 [6.71]  0–EoCb TRA 80.24 66.85 82.7 72.32 82.94 70.82 75.98 [6.86] EoC end of collection period, HP2 Cilengitide nmr dihydroxy bendamustine, M3 γ-hydroxy-bendamustine, M4 N-desmethyl-bendamustine, Pevonedistat chemical structure SD standard deviation, TRA total radioactivity aThese values represent the sum of bendamustine, M3, M4, and HP2 bThe time of the EoC varied among patients and ranged

from 168 to 504 hours The mean cumulative urinary excretion of TRA and unchanged bendamustine, M3, M4, and HP2 during the first 24 hours is shown in Fig. 5 and is summarized per patient in Table 3. Urinary recovery of bendamustine, M3, and M4 was predominantly in collections during the first 4 hours after the start of the infusion. After 8 hours, there were no measurable levels of these compounds in urine. The excretion of HP2 continued slowly, and low but quantifiable levels were still present in the urine samples of 16–24 hours. Fig. 5 Mean (±standard deviation) [n = 6] cumulative urinary excretion of total radioactivity; unchanged

bendamustine; and the metabolites γ-hydroxy-bendamustine, N-desmethyl-bendamustine, and dihydroxy bendamustine up to 24 hours after the start of a 60-minute (120 mg/m2, 80–95 μCi) 14C-bendamustine hydrochloride infusion. HP2 dihydroxy bendamustine, Nabilone M3 γ-hydroxy-bendamustine, M4 N-desmethyl-bendamustine, TRA total radioactivity 3.4 Safety All patients completed assessment period A, receiving a mean of 4 (range 2–6) doses of bendamustine. All were withdrawn during assessment period B: four because of disease progression, one because of an AE (dyspnea), and one because of election to discontinue from the study. During the treatment period, all six patients experienced at least one AE that was considered treatment related. The numbers of patients experiencing worst-value hematologic toxicities occurring during the study are shown in Table 4. A grade 3 or 4 absolute lymphocyte count decrease was observed in all six patients at some point during the study. No other grade 3 or 4 hematologic abnormalities were seen.

Fascial closure was achieved in all patients Following stabiliza

Fascial closure was achieved in all patients. Following stabilization of the patient, the goal is the early and definitive closure of the abdomen, in order to reduce the complications associated with an open abdomen [119]. A review of the literature suggests a bimodal distribution of primary closure rates, with early closure dependent on post operative intensive care management whilst delayed closure is more affected by the choice of the temporary abdominal closure technique [120]. Primary Elafibranor cost fascial closure can be achieved in many cases within few days from the initial operation. It would not be successful if early

surgical source control failed [121, 122]. Sequential fascial closure could immediately be started once abdominal sepsis is well controlled

[123]. In these cases, surgeons should perform a progressive closure, where the abdomen is incrementally closed each time the patient undergoes a reoperation. Within 10 to 14 days Metabolism inhibitor the fascia retracts laterally and becomes adherent to the overlying fat; this makes primary closure impossible. Therefore, it is important to prevent the this website retraction of the myo-fascial unit. Several materials can be used to achieve temporary closure of the abdomen: gauze; mesh; impermeable self-adhesive membrane dressings, zippers and negative pressure therapy (NPT) techniques. The ideal temporary abdominal closure method should be able to protect the abdominal contents, to prevent evisceration, to allow removal of infected or toxic fluid from the peritoneal cavity, to prevent the formation of fistulas, to avoid damage to PIK3C2G the fascia, to preserve the abdominal wall domain, to make re-operation easy, safe and facilitate definitive closure [110]. The surgical options for management of the OA are now more diverse and sophisticated, but there is a lack of prospective randomized controlled trials demonstrating the superiority of any particular method. At present,

negative pressure therapy (NPT) techniques have become the most extensively used methods for temporary abdominal wall closure. NPT actively drains toxin or bacteria-rich intra peritoneal fluid and has resulted in a high rate of fascial and abdominal wall closure [110]. A systematic review conducted in 2012 [124] found only 11 comparative studies, including 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 9 cohort studies, examining the efficacy and safety of negative pressure peritoneal therapy versus alternate temporal abdominal closure methods among critically ill or injured adults. However, all studies were associated with at least a moderate risk of bias and significant clinical heterogeneity, the authors concluded that there was insufficient evidence to support the preferential use of negative pressure peritoneal therapy after damage control laparotomy.

A hyphen indicates that the branch was not obtained with the resp

A hyphen indicates that the branch was not obtained with the respective reconstruction method. Nucleotide sequence accession numbers are given in parentheses. The affiliation of strains to subclades of the OM60/NOR5 group is based on [13]. The sequence of Alcanivorax borkumensis [GenBank:Y12579] was used as outgroup (not shown). Designations given in red color indicate that the respective strains produce BChl a and/or encode genes for a photosynthetic apparatus; names in blue indicate the presence of proteorhodopsin encoding genes. Strains that were tested with specific PCR primers for the presence of pufLM and soxB genes are labeled with red and yellow circles,

respectively. Closed circles indicate a positive PCR reaction and open circles a negative reaction. The bar represents an estimated sequence divergence of 5%. It was not possible to amplify genes encoding proteorhodopsin Saracatinib or the sulfate thiol esterase SoxB from the non-phototrophic species shown in Figure  1. For the PCR screening with

the proteorhodopsin primer set PR1-3 [26] we used genomic DNA from Dokdonia sp. PRO95 [27] as well as total DNA isolated from the North Sea as positive control. However, a proteorhodopsin-positive control strain belonging to this phylogenetic group was not available and the pop gene sequence of strain IMCC3088 revealed some mismatches to the used proteorhodopsin oligonucleotide primers. Thus, either the tested strains do not encode pop genes, or the genes are such different at the primer binding sites that no PCR amplification was possible. Phenotypic characterization Morphology selleck chemicals of cells and colonies Size and shape of cells of the newly isolated not strain Ivo14T were determined upon growth in SYPHC medium, which was optimal for cultivation of this strain and the related species C. litoralis, H. rubra and Chromatocurvus halotolerans. Cells of Ivo14T were non motile and appeared

coccoid or as short straight-to-bent rods. Occurrence of pleomorphic cells was observed in all four BChl a-containing strains and depended to some extent on the composition of the growth medium, which makes it important to use the same medium for comparison of size and shape. Especially, growth on the nutrient-rich medium Marine Broth 2216 led in cultures of H. rubra, C. litoralis and Chromatocurvus learn more halotolerans to cells with irregular shapes, swelling of cells and accumulation of highly refractile storage compounds, whereas these effects were less pronounced in cultures of Ivo14T. The storage compound cyanophycin, which is a characteristic of C. litoralis was not detected in cells of Ivo14T or Chromatocurvus halotolerans, which both accumulate polyhydroxyalkanoates in addition to polyphosphates. The intracellular carbon storage compound of H. rubra could be distinguished from cyanophycin or polyhydroxyalkanoates by a positive reaction of the acidified cell extract with the anthrone reagent, which detects carbohydrates.

1984) By rapid cooling of a thin layer of an aqueous solution of

1984). By rapid cooling of a thin layer of an aqueous solution of macromolecules on an EM grid, a thin amorphous layer of ice is formed,

in which objects are visible without any staining agent. Ice-embedded specimens very much reflect cellular aqueous situations, and hence the method quickly became popular within the field. Because the contrast is only caused by the difference in density between amorphous ice (0.93 g/cm3) and protein (1.3–1.36 g/cm3), it is rather low in comparison to negative staining. It is obvious that for large objects such as symmetric virus molecules, cryo-EM is superior to negative staining. However, in the case of unstable protein complexes, which cannot be purified to AZD1152 manufacturer homogeneity (e.g., large, transient membrane complexes), unstained specimens can be a real problem. Due to the low contrast, the object of choice cannot be discriminated from all kinds of contaminants and PI3K inhibitor breakdown products. The low contrast is, however, likely to be improved in the near future by instrumental improvements, such as implementing phase plates in the microscopes, such as the Zernike phase plate (Yamaguchi et al. 2008). There are several advantages of cryo-EM of vitrified specimens: specimen flattening and other drying artifacts are circumvented. Moreover, cryo-images better reflect the true density of a protein, because the contrast directly originates from scattering

by the protein rather than from the surrounding stain. Also, the interaction of negative stain with the protein is often quite complex if the object is not fully embedded. In thinner stain layers,

the upper part of the protein could easily be less Rapamycin well embedded in the stain CHIR 99021 layer, as pointed out in Fig. 1. This means that the contributions of the upper- and lower half of a protein in the final recorded image do not have the same weighting. In contrast, the embedding in a full ice layer gives a more straightforward signal. Cryo-negative staining represents a complementary method for the conventional negative stain EM and a valuable alternative in particular for situations where cryo-EM reaches its limits in terms of visibility of the protein complexes (De Carlo et al. 2008). In cryo-negative staining, particles become embedded in a rather thick layer of stain which is not fully dehydrated, which may prevent flattening and preferential staining. Fig. 1 An example of the footprint effect of negative staining. a A part of a double-layered two-dimensional crystal containing about 1500 photosystem I monomers from a cyanobacterium (Böttcher et al. 1992). b, c Filtered images resulting from a crystallographic analysis in which the two layers could be separated. The crystal is composed of rows of monomers. Within the rows, the monomers are either up- or down-oriented, and there is a substantial difference in overall contrast between individual rows of monomers in the upper layer with respect to the lower layer.

The type of irrigation system can influence the risk of crop cont

The type of irrigation system can influence the risk of crop contamination: overhead irrigation, for instance, is more likely to produce virus contamination than are furrow and drip irrigation [13]. Studies conducted in California found no significant differences in coliform counts among crops spray-irrigated Rabusertib supplier with two types of treated wastewater or with well water. This was found despite the fact that the treated waters used in this study showed higher levels of total and fecal coliforms than the well water [14]. The overall impact of using surface water

for direct crop applications on fruit surface bacterial communities has not been reported to date. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis studies have indicated that variables such as plant species and stage

of development can affect the composition of phyllosphere microbial communities. In addition, it was found that these communities are far more complex than culture-based methods used in the past had indicated [6, 15, 16]. Recent studies described learn more the bacterial diversity of phyllosphere samples from natural and agricultural ecosystems using traditional cloning and sequencing approaches, leading to the identification of many previously undescribed members of these communities. These studies also indicated that phyllosphere communities can be Enzalutamide order altered by the application of diverse agricultural materials [16–18]. More recently next-generation sequencing technologies, including 454-pyrosequencing, have provided more comprehensive descriptions of bacterial diglyceride communities in different environments due to the increased number of sequence reads obtained [19–26]. A study of bacterial diversity on tree leaves using 454 sequencing indicated that tree and bacterial community phylogeny are associated, and that the geographic differentiation of bacterial communities on a single tree species is minimal [27]. To our knowledge, no such studies have been conducted to date to describe the impact of water quality on bacterial populations in

the phyllosphere of specialty crops. We utilized 454-pyrosequencing to generate 34,016 16S rRNA gene sequences from 16 field samples: 10 tomato fruit samples that had been sprayed with either surface water (ps), or groundwater (pg), three samples of surface water (ws), and three samples of groundwater (wg). Using these data, we sought to 1) compare the bacterial profile of ground and surface water that was used for pesticide applications and 2) assess the impact of water quality on the fruit surface bacterial profile of a tomato crop. A smaller preliminary dataset of 2008 fruit surface samples generated through Sanger sequencing is also included for comparison. Despite the significant differences between bacterial communities in surface and groundwater, the surface communities on the tomato fruits treated with these water sources could not be differentiated by a variety of statistical methods.