Ancient man

Ancient Man and His First Civilizations

Modern Italy

Who or what were the Celts/Gaul’s?

Up until now, nowhere have Whites been more successful in blurring Black history, than with the Celts/Gaul’s. Of course there was no shortage of Whites declaring that they were White people.

According to Diodorus Siculus – who was a Greek historian of the 1st century B.C. (Or at least White people claiming to quote him).


{Strange isn’t it, why there are no similar “Supposed” racial descriptions of the Black Peoples of that time? Oh yes forgot, EVERYONE was White!}

The “Supposed” quote from Diodorus Siculus is particularly strange when taken in historical context (1st century B.C.).

The Germanic peoples were one of the LATE arriving White peoples into Europe. Migrating Germanic peoples spread throughout Europe in Late Antiquity ( about 300-600 A.D.) and the Early Middle Ages. It is thought that the invading Germanic peoples forced the Celts to leave (what is now Germany) and relocate to Southern Europe – (Italy and France). Germanic languages became dominant along the Roman borders, Austria, Germany, Netherlands, Belgium, England, but in the rest of the (western) Roman provinces, the Germanic immigrants adopted Romance dialects.

The migration period peoples that would coalesce into a “German” ethnicity are the Saxones (Saxons), Frisii (Netherlands, Germany), Franci (the Franks), Thuringii (central Germany), Alamanni (Bavarii Czech Republic, Bohemia, Austria, Bavaria).. By the 800s, the territory of modern Germany had been united under the rule of Charlemagne, although much of what is now Eastern Germany remained Slavonic-speaking (Veleti).

Then of course; there were the White DNA studies.

Let us revisit some of the old theory’s: “Studies of the DNA in populations across Europe suggest that haplogroups I (about 25% of the European population) may be the only survivor of Palaeolithic times. The two main White European haplogroups in modern times, R1b in Western Europe, and R1a in Eastern Europe, originated in Central Asia and are thought to have arrived through the Eurasian steppes with the Indo-Arian migrations. Their earliest presence in Europe probably coincides with the Yamna culture (3500 – 2200 B.C.) in modern Ukraine (Russia). Haplogroup J2 has been linked to the migration from the Near East, notably by the Minoan (Black) Greeks and the Phoenician colonization.”

Haplogroup R1a is found today across a large swathe of Asia and Europe and may have originated in South or Central Asia. R1a is most common among Pakistanis, Northern Indians, Russians, Ukrainians and the Kyrgyz and Altai peoples of Central Asia. In Europe R1a is the most common group in Slavic peoples and is also very common in Scandinavia. The presence of R1a in the British Isles is in the main due to Norse Viking ancestry, although Anglo-Saxons and Danes will have carried a smaller proportion there and there is a rare English-specific subgroup. It has been hypothesised that haplogroup R1a was carried to Europe by the Kurgan culture (White people), who domesticated the horse.


That theory had to be re-thought because of this:




DNA tests show that the other two boys were probably brothers, and although the woman could not have been their mother, she is thought to have been a paternal aunt or stepmother. The baby’s body has been too badly preserved for a family relationship to be established.



The Black family as they were found.




Close-up of the Black Mother and father.

As would be expected, finding Black people with the R1a gene has thrown White genetics into a tailspin. (It was long thought that haplogroup “R” was a White clade, introduced into Europe with the Kugan (White people) migrations from Central Asia which started at about 1,500 B.C.). Therefore a NEW theory was needed!



R1a and R1a1a were once believed to have originated somewhere within Eurasia, thought to be in the area from Eastern Europe to South Asia. But the most recent studies indicate that South Asia is a more likely region of origin than Europe.”


Linear Pottery culture (LBK; circa 5,500 B.C. )


Male haplogroups found in the graveyard.

Y-DNA haplogroups – “F” – M89 and “G2a3” – M201, P287, S126 (L30)

Female haplogroups found in the graveyard.

MtDNA haplogroups – HV, H, N1a, N1a1a1, N1a1b, N1a, T, T2, K, W, J, V.

The Celts/Gaul’s


So let us trace the origins of the Hallstatt culture.

It begins with the “Corded Ware” culture




Corded Ware ceramic forms in single graves develop earlier in Poland than in western and southern Central Europe. Contemporary development of non-ceramic Corded Ware burial rites in the western parts have been explained as a spread of Corded Ware cultural traits through a wide-spanning communication network rather than through migration, suggesting the existence of an “A-Horizon” in the 28th century B.C, to be understood as a number of connecting forms within different regional contexts.



The “Beaker” Culture:


Beaker culture is defined by the common use of a pottery style — a beaker with a distinctive inverted bell-shaped profile found across the western part of Europe during the late 3rd millennium B.C. The pottery is well-made, usually red or red-brown in colour, and ornamented with horizontal bands of incised, excised or impressed patterns. The early Bell Beakers have been described as “International” in style, as they are found in all areas of the Bell Beaker culture. These include cord-impressed types, such as the “All Over Corded” (or “All Over Ornamented”), and the “Maritime” type, decorated with bands filled with impressions made with a comb or cord. Later characteristic regional styles developed.



Note: The “Kurgan hypothesis” traces the migrations of White people from Central Asia into Europe.


The “Unetice” Culture



The enigma of a priceless Bronze Age disc seems to have been solved by a Hamburg scientist who has identified it as one of the world’s first astronomical clocks. The 3,600-year-old Sky Disc of Nebra, which surfaced four years ago when German grave robbers tried to sell it on the international market, shows that Bronze Age man had a sophisticated sense of time.

“We have been dramatically underestimating the prehistoric peoples,” said Harald Meller, chief archaeologist of Saxony-Anhalt, where the disc was found.




Herr Hansen first tried to explain the thickness of the moon on the disc. “The crescent on the Sky Disc of Nebra seems to be equivalent to a four-day moon,” he said.


But the knowledge was somehow lost, and scientists say that the clock would have been used for only about 300 years. Herr Maller said: “In the end, the disc became a cult object.”




The “Tumulus” culture




The “Urnfield” culture



The “Hallstatt” culture



Lichtenstein Cave






What happened to the Celts in Germany?



The Migration Period, also called the Barbarian Invasions (and in German: Völkerwanderung ‘migration of peoples’), was a period of human migration that occurred during roughly 300–700 A.D. in Europe, marking the transition from Late Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages. These movements were catalyzed by profound changes within both the Roman Empire and the so-called “barbarian frontier”. Migrating peoples during this period included the Huns, and the Albino Germanic tribes: Goths, Vandals, Avars, Bulgars, Alans, Suebi, Frisians, and Franks, among other Germanic and Slavic tribes.

Thus the Huns forced “MOST” Whites out of their ancestral lands in Asia, and into Europe: causing death and displacement for the native Blacks in Europe.

Later, in about the seventh century, Mongols once again went to war to rid Asia of it’s last Whites – the Turks!

The University of Calgary: Applied History Research Group – The End of Europe’s Middle Ages
Origins of the Ottoman Empire


With the coming of the White Turks, now Blacks in Anatolia, Arabia, the Middle East, and North Africa, would be killed and displaced – and many who survived would be “Absorbed”: creating a new “Sub-Race” of “Brown-Skinned” Turks, who often call themselves Arabs: vis-à-vis their Islamic religion. They are now the ruling elite in North Africa, the middle East, and Arabia.

Conversely: the Black Asians would themselves be “Absorbed” by the remaining Central Asian Albinos and Mongol Albinos: Producing the modern Asian. In 1218, Genghis Khan – one of these now “Whitenized” Asians, sent a trade mission to the Turk Qutb ud-Dīn Muhammad I (who by 1205 had conquered the remaining parts of the Great Seljuq Empire, proclaiming himself Shah (king): he called himself “Khwarezm-Shah”), but at the town of Otrara (a Central Asian town that was located along the Silk Road near the current town of Karatau in Kazakhstan) the governor there, suspecting the Khan’s ambassadors to be spies, confiscated their goods and executed them. Genghis Khan demanded reparations, which the Shah refused to pay. Genghis Khan then sent a second, purely diplomatic mission, they too were murdered. Genghis retaliated with a force of 200,000 men, launching a multi-pronged invasion, his guides were Muslim merchants from Transoxania. During the years 1220–21, Bukhara, Samarkand, Herat (all Central Asian cities), Tus (Susa), and Neyshabur (Persian cities) were razed, and the whole populations were slaughtered. (This represented the first wholesale slaughter of Black Persians).

The advance into Europe continued with Mongol invasions of Poland, Hungary and Transylvania. When the western flank of the Mongols plundered Polish cities, a European alliance consisting of the Poles, the Moravians, the Christian military orders of the Hospitallers, Teutonic Knights and the Templars assembled sufficient forces to halt the Mongol advance at Legnica, but only briefly. The Hungarian army, their Croatian allies and the Templar Knights were beaten by Mongols at the banks of Sajo River on April 11, 1241. After their victories over European Knights at Legnica and Muhi, Mongol armies quickly advanced across Bohemia, Serbia, Babenberg Austria and into the Holy Roman Empire. But before Batu’s forces could continue into Vienna and northern Albania, he received news of Ogedei’s death in December 1241. As was customary in Mongol military tradition, all princes of Genghis’s line had to attend the kurultai to elect a successor. Batu and his western Mongol army withdrew from Central Europe the next year.



The material below by Norse historian Jenny Jochens contains all of the self serving nonsense typical of Albino presented history; not the least of which is the Albino delusion that healthy Black people would want the attributes of a compromised Albino. It is presented only as a way to explain what little diversity there still is in modern Icelanders.

The Viking Age was a period in European history spanning the late 8th to late 11th centuries. Scandinavian (Norse) Vikings explored Europe by its oceans and rivers through trade and warfare. The Vikings also reached Iceland, Greenland, Newfoundland, and Anatolia. Additionally, there is evidence to support the Vinland legend that Vikings reached farther west to the North American continent. The Vikings who invaded western and eastern Europe were chiefly pagans from Denmark, Norway and Sweden.

The Sagas of Icelanders—many of which are also known as family sagas—are prose histories mostly describing events that took place in Iceland in the 10th and early 11th centuries, during the so-called Saga Age. They are the best-known specimens of Icelandic literature. Noted Norse historian Jenny Jochens makes use of these Sagas in her essay:

Race and Ethnicity in the Old Norse World (excerpts)
by Jenny Jochens
from Viator, Volume 30, UCLA, 1999

Quote: Tacitus (the Roman historian) attributed the uniform physical characteristics of the Germanic tribesmen–blue eyes, reddish hair, and large stature–to their lack of intermarriage with other peoples. While Tacitus’ observations may have remained accurate for several more centuries, Northern Europeans eventually began to display a greater variety of physical traits reflecting genetic changes associated with migratory movements. By the Saga Age, swarthy complexions and features were not unknown in the North, but they were considered aesthetic faults. “Geirmundar ßáttr heljarskins” tells of Geirmundr and Hámundr, twin sons of a minor 9th century Norwegian king who were born with skin so dark they were called heljarskin–Hel-Skin; Black as Hel. The term “svartr” (black) is commonly ascribed in the sagas to people with dark coloring, contrasted with “hvítr” (white) for those of fair complexion and features. These terms do not refer to race in the modern sense–black Africans were never described as svartr, but as blámenn (blue men). Note: (No effort is made to substantiate the claim). Still, the svartr/hvítr distinction shows an early attunement to physical differences based on coloring. The Anglo-Saxons from earliest times had been intermarrying with Celts, introducing genes for dark hair and swarthy coloring into Germanic bloodlines. These characteristics were gradually brought to Norway by the traffic in captive women.

A greater mixing of the genetic pool took place in early Iceland, which became a veritable melting pot of Scandinavian and Celtic settlers. Throughout this process, literary references make it clear that Nordic peoples considered Celts to be dark, and thought of themselves as fair by contrast. As Norsemen came into increasingly greater contact with Celts, the byname hvíti (the White) became common. This byname was probably not bestowed on fair-featured Norwegians by Celts, but rather indicated self-awareness of light complexion as a noteworthy trait on the part of the Norse themselves. The sagas and especially Landnámabók show that the byname hvíti often passed from father to son and tended to run in families–presumably applying to fair- complected Norwegians who lived or traded with darker-skinned people for several generations. Svartr, “Black” or “the Black,” was a common byname in early Iceland, usually referring to people of pure or mixed Celtic blood. Although a significant percentage of the settlers of Iceland were of Celtic extraction, they generally adopted Norse names. Moreover, Norse/ Icelandic slaveholders often gave their Celtic thralls (serf or slave) Norse names–including the proper name, Svartr. The names Hvíti and Svartr thus came to be associated with not just shades of coloring, but also social status. Two sagas mention settlers named Svartr who are clearly not thralls, but both are described as unpleasant and violent.

The sagas contain many examples of a perceived connection between dark features and Celtic origins, as well as a general aversion to such looks. In general, Celts were considered to be ugly because they were dark. Typical is the serving maid’s description of Kormák the skald as “svartr or ljótr”–dark and ugly. These adjectives were applied so often to people of Celtic extraction that they became bynames and then proper names. While Svartr/svarti served mainly to designate the darkness of “the other” with whom the Norse settlers shared their new homeland, the name Ljótr (Ugly/the Ugly) incorporates an aesthetic judgment, if not a sense of hostility. Both names continued down through the generations after the Settlement, confirming that dark, Celtic features were inherited and that they continued to be noticed. Dark features in women apparently met with less disapproval than in men. No women are known to have been given svartr-names, although several women of Celtic origin with the name Ljót appear in the lore. This greater acceptance may be related to the fact that Nordic men had no apparent qualms about interbreeding with (and indeed marrying) Celtic women. Dark featured men were more feared and (especially in early Iceland) competed with Nordic men for the relatively small supply of females.

ORKNEY (an archipelago in northern Scotland).

If Iceland offers a melting pot in which a majority of Norse immigrants received infusions from a minority of Celtics, the reverse obtains in Orkney, but on a lesser scale. Here a Norse minority intruded into a mass of native people–probably Picts–of darker hues. Conquered by Vikings (875), the islands were long dominated by the Norse. Icelandic authors dealt with this Norse presence in the archipelago in Orkneyinga saga.


Despite their fundamental dislike of dark features, Norwegians were able to overlook the difference between themselves and Celts which they considered minor. Mingling successfully with the natives on the western islands, they accepted people from these areas in the new society they established in Iceland. In the process they produced the Icelandic population who displayed their ancestors’ distinctive traits epitomized in the contrast between dark and blond. During the Icelandic colonization of Greenland sexual contacts did not occur between the Norse and the Inuit, perhaps simply because of the great distance that separated the two. Maintaining existence separate from the Inuit may have been further conditioned by the Norse experience in the New World.
In Vinland the Greenlanders encountered Indians and or Inuit immediately. The exchanges–mainly of an economic nature–were initially friendly but quickly turned hostile and persuaded the Norse to return home. Aggravating the situation was the demography of the Norse contingent. More an expedition than a colony, it contained too few women, as the following statement from Eiríks saga reveals: “There was deep division between the men on account of the women, for the unmarried men fell afoul of the married, which led to serious disturbances”. Judging from the sagas, the Norse did not permit close contact with the natives who, on their side, made an effort to meet the intruders. Norse men may not have sought sexual encounters with local women because the Indians of the New World–as the Inuit in Greenland–were of strikingly different physique. Although the Norse had accommodated the differences of the Celtic people, the alterity of the Inuit and Indians was too great.

In all likelihood, the sight of the aborigines appears to have generated revulsion in the Norse. The term skrælingjar which designated the populations of both Greenland and Vinland is hardly flattering, since it suggests wizened and dried-up features. In a face-to-face encounter m Vinland the natives were described as “dark (svartir, in a variant version: small [smáir]) and evil-looking men with rough hair on their heads: they had large eyes and broad cheekbones”. In Vinland sexual frustration and reproductive needs were not enough to overcome the Norse bias. With insufficient imported or native women, the colonists finally abandoned their experiment in the New World. This later failure to mix with peoples of pronouncedly distinctive physical traits should not obscure the achievement that Norse and Celts had earlier overcome their visible and audible differences. The rapprochement had started on the Bntish Isles and was practiced by both sides.

Celts taken as slaves by Vikings and brought to Iceland had little choice but to accept the conditions enforced upon them, but others came voluntarily. They willingly gave up their identity epitomized by their Celtic names and took on Norse names: at best a part of their old selves was preserved in nicknames that may have seemed unimportant to themselves but were bestowed by their masters who thus identified them in the new world of Iceland. Together with their names they also abandoned their native language and learned Norse, a language so different from their own that perfection may only have been achieved by the new generation.

On the other hand, Norse men who arrived in small groups were eager to enlist a labor force sufficient for the colossal work of extracting a livelihood from the empty land and its stubborn resources. They imported Celtic slaves and welcomed free Celts on their own, often giving or selling land to them. Favoring their own blond appearance, however, the Norse were unable to hide their discomfort–perhaps tinged with an element of fear–prompted by the dark complexion of the foreigners to whom they attributed distinctive names and unflattering epithets. Since the Norse brought only few women from Norway, female slaves from the Celtlc world were valued both for their physical labor and sexual services.

In the beginning free Celts tended to associate wnh each other, and Celtic men may have preferred to marry women of their own. but slave women were in no position to refuse their sexuality to their Norse masters. Nameless Celtic slaves and named but single men from Norway initiated the inter-mingling and produced a portion of the first cohort of native Icelanders, some of whom displayed the dark characteristics of their Celtic mothers. In the following generations men and women married with little concern for ethnic origin.

The adaptability of the original Celts and the corresponding receptivity of the Norse reduced racial and ethnic tension and produced in Iceland a culture remarkable for its homogeneity, but forged by a population which was and has remained more varied than elsewhere in the North, at least until the middle of this century. Although on a smaller scale and with fewer physical varieties than Rome, medieval Iceland nonetheless offers an illustration of the subtext of biological diversity among the ancient Romans which is lurking beneath Tacitus’s perception concerning the homogeneity of the Germanic tribes cited at the beginning of this essay.


The fact that Blacks were a significant part of Northern European populations as Kings, leaders, Serfs, and Slaves, is confirmed by many different sources. But note how Albino supposed “SCIENTISTS” unfailingly choose to explain the presence of Blacks in those parts as something unusual, generally Slaves. Please note; the following lying example is NOT the exception, it is the RULE!

Today, most Icelanders look like this:


But there is also some who look like this:

Related material – The British Isles


Click here for the Celts in Britain: Click >>>

Wetwang Woman

In March 2001 an Iron Age grave was discovered in the village of Wetwang in East Yorkshire, England. It was found during the construction of a small housing development by Hogg the Builders of York. The grave was then excavated by a team of archaeologists from The Guildhouse Consultancy and the British Museum, and funded by English Heritage. The excavation showed that the grave was that of a woman who had died over 2,300 years ago and was buried with a chariot.


The Ivory Bangle Lady

The ivory bangle lady came from a group of graves excavated in 1901, on what would have been the approaches to the Roman city of Eboracum, modern York. The burials were dated to the second half of the fourth century AD, and many had rich grave goods.

She was buried with items including jet and elephant ivory bracelets, earrings, beads and a blue glass jug. She also had a rectangular piece of bone, which is thought to have originally been mounted in a wooden box, which was carved to read, “Hail, sister, may you live in God’.


The grave goods and skeletal remains of the Ivory Bangle Lady were studied by the archaeology department of the University of Reading. The university’s Dr Hella Eckardt said a study of the skull’s size and facial features along with analysis of the chemical signature of the food and drink she had consumed led to their conclusion that she was of high status and of African origin.

Dr Eckardt said: “Multi-cultural Britain is not just a phenomenon of more modern times. “Analysis of the ‘Ivory Bangle Lady’ and others like her, contradicts common popular assumptions about the make up of Roman-British populations as well as the view that African immigrants in Roman Britain were of low status, male and likely to have been slaves.” Story from BBC NEWS. (Note; that in this BBC story, “Africans” the ORIGINAL settlers of the British Isles, are referred to as “IMMIGRANTS”). Another fine example of how Whites use their media to falsify history.


Stonehenge Archer
The Stonehenge Archer is the name given to a Bronze Age man whose body was discovered in the outer ditch of Stonehenge. Unlike most burials in the Stonehenge Landscape, his body was not in a barrow, although it did appear to have been deliberately and carefully buried in the ditch.

Examination of the skeleton indicated that the man was local to the area and aged about 30 when he died. Radiocarbon dating suggests that he died around 2300 B.C, making his death roughly contemporary with the Amesbury Archer and the Boscombe Bowmen buried 3 miles away in Amesbury. He came to be known as an archer because of the stone wrist-guard and a number of flint arrowheads buried with him. In fact, several of the arrowheads’ tips were located in the skeleton’s bones, suggesting that the man had been killed by them.


Note difference in Nasal bridge between a Black man and a Caucasian.


Cheddar Man

Gough’s Cave is located in Cheddar Gorge, a deep canyon on the southern edge of Somerset’s Mendip Hills, in Cheddar, Somerset, England. The cave is 90 metres (295 ft) deep and is 2.135 kilometres (1.33 mi) long, and contains a variety of large chambers and rock formations. It contains the Cheddar Yeo, the largest underground river system in Britain. In 1903 the remains of a human male, since named Cheddar Man, were found a short distance inside Gough’s Cave. He is Britain’s oldest complete human skeleton, having been dated to approximately 7150 BCE Re-tested: New date 12,700 B.C. There is a suggestion that the man died a violent death, perhaps related to cannibalism, although this has not been proven. In 2007 a carving of a mammoth, estimated to be 13,000 years old, was also found in the cave.

Skull comparison:

White Male (above).

Black Male – Cheddar Man.


In the 1980s, excavations uncovered accumulations of human and animal bones and artefacts that appeared to be much older even than Cheddar Man. The discoveries caused a sensation when it was realised many human remains bore a pattern of cut marks compatible with cannibalism. However, researchers were perplexed by the radiocarbon dating results. Although the remains seemed to represent a single occupation level in the sediments, the remains appeared to be a thousand years different in age. “We had these apparently cannibalised human bones and artefacts and animal remains with signs of butchery. They all looked like they should be part of a consistent population pattern,” said Chris Stringer, head of human origins at London’s Natural History Museum. “Even some re-fits of bones which seemed to be from the same individual were giving different ages.”


These results confirm the site’s great antiquity and suggest human hunters re-colonised Britain at a time of rapid climate warming. 24,000 years ago, an ice sheet extended over much of Britain. Beyond that ice sheet, in southern Britain and much of northern France, the environment resembled a polar desert. Evidence suggests these inhospitable conditions kept people out of north-west Europe for more than 9,000 years. But human groups were able to retreat to ice-free areas (refugia) in southern France, Iberia (Spain) and elsewhere. After the Ice Age peaked, humans bounced back, expanding from the southern refugia to re-colonise northern Europe.

To summarize what we know of the ancient Black people of Europe, and their DNA haplogroups.


DNA results for the original people of Europe

Black Eastern Europeans – mainly Y-dna haplogroup “I”







DNA Definitions

(Just another White Lie)

We were probably all “taken-in” by the White mans claims that DNA study could clearly define who-was-who in ancient history. And knowing the White mans track record of lying about such matters, we all just naturally assumed that the DNA of ancient Blacks in Europe, Asia, North Africa, the Middle East, and the Americas was already done, but Whites simply wouldn’t release it, or would release it, while calling it something else.

Well, we were partially right: the DNA of ancient Blacks in Europe, Asia, North Africa, the Middle East, and the Americas is already done, but Whites simply wouldn’t release it, or release it, while calling it something else.

But the White mans claims that DNA study could clearly define who-was-who in ancient history is a BUST! As we can see from the data above: that which we were told were the “White” haplogroups; like R1 and R2, are instead, indisputably “Black” haplogroups. As always; all roads lead “Back” to the Black man.

There is a chart of Modern White European Y-DNA which clearly shows that there is NO uniquely “White” haplogroups; but rather, all White DNA is derived from Black haplogroups. But since this page is already very long: in order to save space, we are providing a link to the chart, instead of placing it on this page.

Note: the chart has live links to the sources used for the chart. It is interesting and amusing; to read the conclusions drawn, and why they were drawn. It truly gives insight into the minds of these fabricators. Click here for the chart <<Click>>


mtDNA Haplogroup: U
Conventional interpretation of the Albino people

Haplogroup U, appearing about 55,000 – 60,000 years ago, is one of the oldest branches descending from haplogroup R. Haplogroup U has extremely broad geographic distribution, ranging from Europe and North Africa to India and Central Asia. Frequencies of haplogroup U range from 10-30% in these populations.

The wide distribution of haplogroup U is primarily due to its antiquity, with its appearance immediately following that of haplogroup R, after “the Out of Africa” exit. Subsequent migrations in turn gave birth to numerous subclades linked to specific geographic distributions. Currently, nine main subgroups (U1-U9) have been identified within haplogroup U, some of which have been widely analyzed by population geneticists and anthropologists.

Phylogeography of U

Subhaplogroup U2 is subdivided into five subclades: U2a, U2b, U2c, U2d, and U2e (“e” means European). Subclades U2a-d are all typical of the Indo-Pakistani region, and are found in 8-9% of the total population. These subclades appeared from 35,000 to 40,000 years ago.

Subhaplogroup U7 is also prevalent in South Asia. Frequencies among South Asian populations include 12% of the population in Gujarat (western India), 5% in Pakistan, and about 2% in India. This subhaplogroup is also common in the Near East, found in 10% of Iranians.

Subhaplogroup U6 is typical of North Africa and appears to have originated in the Near East about 40,000 years ago, and subhaplogroup U5 is typical of Europe. Despite the difference in their geographic distributions U5 and U6 are strikingly similar to one another. It has been postulated that the two populations harboring the U6 and U5 mitochondrial DNA variants were living in the same broad geographic area of southwestern Asia when they were affected by an event that led to their expansion and relocation. There was a change in climate conditions about 43,000 years ago which allowed humans to enter the Levant and then Europe and North Africa. Thus, while U5 took part in the first settlement of Europe by modern humans, U6 (and a subclade of M, called M1) entered North Africa giving rise to the so called “Back to Africa” expansion (Back migrations are completely unproven). This scenario reinforces the idea that the first cultures in North Africa and Europe had a common source.

Moreover, the subclade U5b has been identified as a marker (together with H1, H3 and V) that characterizes the dynamics of late glacial dispersal in Europe (and other regions). In fact, after the last Ice Age passed (about 13,000 years ago) hunter-gatherer populations, which took refuge in a few areas of Southern Europe including the Iberian Peninsula (Spain and Portugal), gradually repopulated much of central and northern Europe, as well as northern Africa by crossing the Strait of Gibraltar. However, the U5b subclade is found also in northern Nordic countries. A particular variation within this subclade known as U5b1b defines 27% of Swedish Saami, 40% of Finnish Saami, and 57% of Norwegian Saami peoples.

Subhaplogroup U8 can be further subdivided into the subclades U8a and U8b. The oldest U8a lineages in Europe were found among the Basques supporting the idea that Basques could have participated in the demographic re-expansion that took place after the last Ice Age (see above). U8b includes the cluster K that was initially identified as an independent haplogroup.



Ancient Europeans Mysteriously Vanished 4,500 Years Ago
Tia Ghose, LiveScience Staff Writer
Date: 23 April 2013 Time: 11:09 AM ET

The findings, detailed today (April 23) in the journal Nature Communications, were drawn from several skeletons unearthed in central Europe that were up to 7,500 years old. “What is intriguing is that the genetic markers of this first pan-European culture, which was clearly very successful, were then suddenly replaced around 4,500 years ago, and we don’t know why,” said study co-author Alan Cooper, of the University of Adelaide Australian Center for Ancient DNA, in a statement. “Something major happened, and the hunt is now on to find out what that was.”

(That is of course a lie, they know very well what happened: their people – Albinos from central Asia – invaded circa 2,500 B.C.)

“We have established that the genetic foundations for modern Europe were only established in the Mid-Neolithic, after this major genetic transition around 4,000 years ago,” study co-author Wolfgang Haak, also of the Australian Center for Ancient DNA, said in a statement. “This genetic diversity was then modified further by a series of incoming and expanding cultures from Iberia and Eastern Europe through the Late Neolithic.”

Click here for link to Livescience article

Click here for link to the study at Nature Communications


Who are these modern White (Albino) Europeans?

Through means and methods that we can still only guess at, these least of all humans, both numerically and otherwise, had managed to gain control over much of the world. Though that control is now waning, many, especially the uneducated, are still dependent on them to tell us exactly who they are. But even this simple task is complicated by the fact that these people once claimed to be native to Europe, and today, the uneducated still do. Therefore their researchers and educators tend to lie and double-talk as relates to the origins of the European Albinos.
The Germanics:

This is particularly true of the Germanics: The basic ethnic stock in the composition of the modern peoples of Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Iceland, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Northern Italy, the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, North and central France, Lowland Scotland, and England. When we go to the Encyclopedia to look-up Germanics, we are greeted with pure nonsense as to their origins. But when we use a lateral approach, such as looking up their former tormentors, the Huns, then we see more truthful entries.
The Huns

The Huns occupied North China from the 3rd century until 581. Having swept across Asia, they invaded the lower Volga valley (Russia – see map) c.372 and advanced westward, pushing the Germanic Ostrogoths and Visigoths before them and thus precipitating the great waves of migrations (into Europe) that destroyed the Roman Empire and changed the face of Europe.

See T. Hodgkin, Italy and Her Invaders, Vol. I (rev. ed. 1892, repr. 1967); W. M. McGovern, Early Empires of Central Asia (1939); E. A. Thompson, A History of Attila and the Huns (1948); F. Teggart, China and Rome (1969, repr. 1983); J. D. Maenchen-Helfen, The World of the Huns (1973).


The Slavs

The Slavs are the largest ethnic and linguistic group of peoples in Europe belonging to the Indo-European linguistic family. It is estimated that the Slavs number over 300 million in the world. They are usually classified in three main divisions. The West Slavs include the Poles, the Czechs, the Slovaks, and the Wends (also known as Lusatians) and other small groups in East Germany. The South Slavs include the Serbs, the Croats, the Slovenes, the Macedonians, the Montenegrins, the Bosniaks, and the Bulgars. The East Slavs, the largest group, include the Great Russians, Ukrainians, and Belorussians (or White Russians).

Ethnically the Slavs possess little unity, for they have mixed for centuries with other peoples, including Turko-Tatars, Finnic peoples, Germans, Mongols, Greeks, and Illyrian tribes. The Bulgarians are not of Slavic origin. The obscure beginnings of the Slavs have given rise to several theories, all of which include as a possible place of origin the area of the Polesie marshes in Galicia (region spanning southeastern Poland and western Ukraine ). The ancestors of the Slavs were Neolithic tribes who occupied this territory a few centuries before the Christian era. (The Albinos will not venture into their origins before this time, as that would surely lead to Central Asia and Albinohood).

See K. Jazdzewski, Atlas to the Prehistory of the Slavs (tr., 2 vol., 1948—49); J. S. Roucek, ed., Slavonic Encyclopaedia (4 vol., 1949, repr. 1969); F. Dvornik, The Slavs (1956) and The Slavs in European History and Civilization (1962, repr. 1986); S. H. Cross, Slavic Civilization through the Ages (1963); A. P. Vlasto, The Entry of the Slav
s into Christendom (1970); M. A. Gimbutas, The Slavs (1971).

Because the Turks are now a predominately Mulatto people, no efforts are made to hide their origins. Therefore all Albino sources will freely admit that Turks were an Asian People.

Greeks and Romans

Greeks and Romans were a Black and Mulatto people comprised of the Original Black Europeans and the first Central Asian Albinos to reach Europe, circa 1200 B.C. Modern Albinos have nothing to do with these people, as they were the victims of the marauding Albinos from Central Asia. But modern Albinos do falsely claim that the Hellenes of Greece were Albinos. The Greek historian Herodotus clearly explains the Hellenes were only “partly Albino” thusly:.
Herodotus (circa 440 B.C.)

Book 1 – CLIO



Please visit the “Additional Material Area” for many more photographs of each civilization, and related material

Liked it? Take a second to support wmb3331 on Patreon!

Published by wmb3331


Leave a comment

Leave a Reply


%d bloggers like this: