The British Role in the Coup Against the President Is Now Exposed

Understanding the ferocity of the attacks on Donald Trump and our Constitution may seem to be a head scratcher. Is it really just due to Barack Obama and Hillary partisans at the top levels of the Justice Department, conspiring with a bunch of know-nothing, hot-headed, politically correct millennials and sour Deep State apparatchiks in the news media—the meme favored by Fox News?
by Barbara Boyd,
Part I
The British Lords’ First Priority: No Second Term for Donald Trump
In the report itself, the Lords huff that Donald Trump has completely imperiled the globalist “post-War rules based International order” as well as the “special relationship” between the United States and Britain. They say this while, at the same time, reveling in their success in infiltrating and controlling the United States following World War II. The covert defense and intelligence relationships flowing from the special relationship are sufficient, they argue, to survive one term of Trump. But, not two. Otherwise, they are terrified by the activation of the “people” in the Brexit vote in Britain and in the 2016 election in the United States. They cite the free ability of individuals to access information as the central threat to their ability to rule. To answer this, they intend to create censorship and propaganda regimes which would make George Orwell’s fictional Ministry of Truth in his novel, 1984, seem like child’s play.
Video of Who Benefits from the Chaos of the Global Financial System?
LaRouchePAC’s mini-documentary on why FDR’s fixed exchange rate Bretton Woods system was taken down.

Much of the success of this infiltration can be traced to British recognition of the simple fact that how individuals think about the world and whether their surrounding culture encourages or destroys human creativity, constitute the most important battlegrounds of strategic warfare and grand strategy. That is why Lyndon LaRouche starts just about every strategic analysis he makes by demonstrating that men and women are not animals, not beasts. The contrary assertion, that they are beasts, incapable of knowing any universal truth, is the central tenet of British liberalism. It is no accident that the House of Lords report lists British universities as a critical “soft power” resource and puts expansion of Marshall scholarships on the same level of importance as relations with major foreign states.
According to the delusional and paranoid “narrative” presented in the House of Lords report, the world-wide economic collapse resulting from their austerity and bailout policies in 2008, absolutely did not cause the revolt of their population in the June 2016 vote to leave the European Union. The collapse simply increased “economic anxieties” among the commoners. The problem, the Lords say, is “people’s access to information, boosted by instant connectivity on an unprecedented scale and speed. Governments are responding to short-term demands of their citizens, who have been empowered by their access to information and opinion.” This is the imperial line first promulgated by Samuel Huntington, author of the genocidal tract “Clash of Civilizations” and inventor of the term “Davos man” to celebrate globalization. In his 1975 Crisis of Democracy Report for the Trilateral Commission, Huntington proclaimed that democracies only work when large swaths of the population are apathetic, citing the empowerment of African-Americans by the civil rights movement as a clear and present danger to political stability.
Present Imperial Policy
The next changed circumstance for British foreign policy is the “rise of China.” The Lords readily acknowledge that China’s economy is rapidly outpacing the productivity of any economy in the West and that the Belt and Road infrastructure initiative is the largest such project ever undertaken by mankind. True to British form, they have publicly embraced China’s Belt and Road Initiative, and they participate in the China-launched Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. But they do this in order to bend these initiatives to their financial and geopolitical advantage. About this, they are explicit: “We welcome the UK’s engagement with new international institutions such as the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. The UK should use its membership to shape the lending terms and governance of these bodies.” They harp on: “The UK should be a vocal champion of reform to international institutions. It should support reforms both to make these institutions more efficient, and to give a greater voice to emerging powers—particularly China and India—to build their support for the rules-based international order.”


7 thoughts on “The British Role in the Coup Against the President Is Now Exposed”

  1. We must not forget the titles and status given to the King by Ben franklin in the 1783 Treaty of Paris have been passed on to future kings and now Queen Elizabeth as Arch- Treasurer and Elector of the United States of America.
    Queen Elizabeth now controls and has amended U.S. Social Security
    See: S.I. 1997 NO.1778 The Social Security ( United States of America)
    Doesn’t this give a new meaning to Federal Judge William Wayne Justice
    stating in court that he takes his orders from England? After all he is a BAR member. This order goes on to redefine words in the Social Security Act and makes some changes in United States Law.
    Does anyone want to guess what controls she has as Queen Elector of the United States of America?

  2. Ri-chard I’m not sure I am qualified to guess, but I do recall reading about this in one of Eustace Mullins’ books. Hazarding a guess, effectively that of an absolute Monarch ie Queen of America? And, for the other punters who cruise this blog, is it a bit more than Pope/ Vatican?

  3. No need to guess. always follow the money and you will find the controlling sources.
    What I state are not my words or thoughts when it is the government’s words from their documents. No guessing needed..
    Ben Franklin the lead negotiator of the Treaty of Paris was and Englishman Esquire. Esquire is a title of nobility. He was also and English Mason. That alone should tell you who his allegiances were to. How many masters can one serve.
    After the war Ben agreed to allow the King to have control of America’s money and banking as Arch-Treasurer of the United States of America. Then it was agreed the King should have control over the Body Politic as Prince Elector. the Ben agreed the king should have a share of all the gold, silver and copper found in America plus this would include his heirs with no end date = perpatuity.
    Remember their words with their signitures. All that signed the Treaty were Esquires. just read the document for who recieved the spoils of war. Why would they do this to us? America was broke and the King could bail out America’s war debt. That reads like they were traititors – right? The sold out the settlers. All of the founders sold out but you must understand they didn’t want to rule a country that was broke.
    Yes, the lead Mason, George Washington knew of this Treaty as well. He was the first to enact the War Power Act that made it easy for President Roosevelt to do what he did against the people because the Act was never cancelled..
    Always follow the money and read this
    Again, no guessing needed. The truth is in our face if we chose to look at it on the government’s websites and associated archive links.

      1. I spend a lot of time in Europe every year and mostly in France where my family wine business is. I manage the Embassy accounts because of my work relationship with the U.S. Department of State. click English
        I believe I have a good understanding of what most Europeans think of their government and it’s not good. However, most are scared of doing what they know is the right thing to do because they have been farmed for so long to be so dependent on the government. Therefore there are serious doubts for knowing how they could take care of themselves and family.
        In America they don’t know the truth and when confronted with it they suffer from the worst desease called cognitive dissonance. They don’t want to believe their government would do this to them. Not understanding its not their government. It is the government they didn’t know they had.

Leave a Reply
