Military parents deserve school choice

At present, military parents are limited to local public schools for the education of their children.  But efforts are underway to give them the same right that civilian parents possess by defunding a program known as Impact Aid. (“Betsy DeVos Is Facing Backlash for Her Plan to Push School Vouchers on Military Families,” The Nation, May 1).

Because military bases are tax-exempt sites, the federal government has long offered subsidies that are designed to offset the lack of resources normally provided by local property taxes. That certainly is fair.  But recent House education legislation would divert the funds to Education Savings Accounts to give military parents greater choice.

If the bill becomes law, it has to give parents enough to pay for private schools and other services.  Unfortunately, it does not, offering a maximum of $4,500 for families in high-needs Impact Aid districts or $2,500 for those families outside those areas.  That certainly is not fair because the amounts do not come close to paying for the full cost of private schools, which is roughly $10,000.

Instead of throwing the baby out with the bathwater, however, the bill needs to be altered to reflect the true cost of non-public school tuition.  I say that because military parents already sacrifice so much in serving the country.  Yes, choice always involves doing due diligence.  But I maintain that military parents should have the same right to decide which school is best for their own children.




2 Replies to “Military parents deserve school choice”

  1. Impact Aid is in lieu of real estate taxes. Seems like the local govt, not the US govt, should be deciding how that Impact Aid is spent. If the US govt wants to provide voucher $ to military families, it should be in addition to rather than instead of the Impact Aid. By analogy, private property owners who pay real estate taxes to the local govt do not have the option of withholding some or all of their real estate taxes and contributing the withheld real estate tax $ to ESAs, charters, libraries or any other substitute for services provided by the local govt.


  2. Labor Lawyer: Impact aid should not be abolished and replaced by vouchers in order to be fair to all stakeholders. Unfortunately, it is almost seen as “double dipping.” My main concern is that military families not be penalized. They already make great sacrifices for the country.


Leave a Reply


You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo


Twitter picture


Facebook photo


Connecting to %s