Collectivism and the Aggression Principle

Essay of Collectivism and the Aggression Principle

The practice of a group having more liberties than an individual is flawed. Should it concern anyone that I could have an armed drone, I solely own, flying around our skies? It should. Equally, it should concern you that a group has assumed they have the right to do this. The practice of discriminating who may do what, will eventually lead to megalomaniacal rulers. Either we all must have the same ability, or no one may have the ability. Classically, it has always been criminals that practice what is not allowed of the people. Today we classify them as politicians, corporations and governments. Our constitution was written to limit the abilities of government from exceeding the public liberties. The fact that government has overstepped this restriction is testament they do not respect our equal rule of law. It is past due the time for sundering this government. The states must rise as sovereign, yet united, against the tyranny of extreme collectivism.

Realistically and logically; all people are individuals and wholly responsible for their own security and well-being. No collection, group, or committee of individuals may dictate otherwise. These responsibilities may extend to the small group of family, or a township of like-minded families; but mandates from hundreds of miles away are indeed foreign and have no business being observed.

My task was to:
1. Form a logical argument explaining why it is necessary to allow groups public liberties that the individual may not exercise.
2. Discover the purpose of authority with privileged rights.
3. Note what types of people are attracted to politics and positions of delegated authority.
4. Research the result of systems built on the ideas of collectivism.

I was not astonished by my findings because I’ve been objectively awake for decades. With research, I very often find to be true what I suspect while dissecting propaganda and placing bias. So yes, this outcome was likely predestined but valid.

I could not form a logical argument supporting collectivism. All people are sovereign. There are groups that would say otherwise, but what do you expect from them? They’re collectivists, and I am not. Certainly there are some that are better than others at any given task, but that selective superiority cannot demand authority.

The purpose of authority having privileged rights is for strong organization under threat of coercion or force (privileged rights) to meet set goals. This is why cops can hit you without thought of consequence but if you touch an officer, you can be beaten and arrested for assault. There is no disputing this model gets results but the result is tyrannical; and immoral if deployed publicly.

Psychos and sickos run it all. Anytime authority is delegated, the devious schemers and power hungry volunteer because it places them in the position to collect and secure more power for groups. Always seeking advancement, this form of greed is an artificial appetite brought on by a psychosis. Perpetually discontent, they must demand the power to elevate themselves above all others as a special group. Certainly there are the true servants that seek public office, but they rarely succeed to the levels of office that candidates conspiring in secret toward group efforts will achieve. Ultimately, the individual has no place in politics. I’ve discovered this is the natural order of all sociology. This aggression principle and attraction to group power structures is fascinating. While I assume this must be noted elsewhere, I feel I’ve made a contribution toward a deeper understanding of groups.

Collectivism results in social adherence to strict rules that benefit few people. Collectivism is progression of unnecessary sacrifices; a marketable and trendy anti-freedom product. It is government pushing fear of a chaotic result if the group should ever fail. One such group today is called progressives; their goals to power require severe political and social reform. A historical and dangerously successful progressive collectivist movement was the German Worker’s Party, later known as the Nazi Party. The Nazi’s were champions of the aggression principle. Many of the party followers were brainwashed into believing peace was obtainable by forcefully reforming all nations into one nation. Meanwhile, the Nazis were committing genocide and performing occult rituals under guidance of the Thule Society. Even today, group leaders meet in Bohemian Grove among the redwoods to perform what we hope are just mock human sacrifices. Surely this behavior must be tradition from their activities with Skull & Bones. Though that is not the case, as a multitude of other secretive societal denizens participate in the Bohemian Grove collective.

My earlier studies into the occult have informed me of the benefits to possessing knowledge which is unknown to most. There is a psychological edge with the Saturnalia practices but it affects only the participants of that black mass with a false-knowledge; simply an understanding among that group. This is an important point. A secret known only to a group is a very powerful atmosphere; the darker the secret, the more powerful the psychological effect. It can only affect them, not the uninitiated. There is no magick involved; it is simply the creation of a testament to will force, and followed possibly by the occasional human sacrifice. “Burnt offering” translates to Holocaust so that may be something to consider when you learn of genocide perpetrated by warring government groups.

The practice of the group’s importance over the individual may be the single most dangerous exercise of the ages. I can’t help but to think materialism and a disbelief of permanent consequence led to apathetic group behavior.

-Jeremy Edward Dion