
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit

Difference between revisions of "Testing for Privilege escalation (OTG-AUTHZ-003)"

Jump to: navigation, search
(Description of the Issue)
m (Added more detail to Wiki entry)
Line 66: Line 66:
== References ==
== References ==
* Wikipedia:<br>
* Wikipedia - Privilege Escalation:<br>
* OWASP WebScarab: [[OWASP_WebScarab_Project]]
* OWASP WebScarab: [[OWASP_WebScarab_Project]]

Revision as of 10:17, 6 November 2012

OWASP Testing Guide v3 Table of Contents



Brief Summary

This section describes the issue of escalating privileges from one stage to another. During this phase, the tester should verify that it is not possible for a user to modify his or her privileges/roles inside the application in ways that could allow privilege escalation attacks.

Description of the Issue

Privilege escalation occurs when a user gets access to more resources or functionality than they are normally allowed, and such elevation/changes should have been prevented by the application. This is usually caused by a flaw in the application. The result is that the application performs actions with more privileges than those intended by the developer or system administrator.

The degree of escalation depends on which privileges the attacker is authorized to possess, and which privileges can be obtained in a successful exploit. For example, a programming error that allows a user to gain extra privilege after successful authentication limits the degree of escalation, because the user is already authorized to hold some privilege. Likewise, a remote attacker gaining superuser privilege without any authentication presents a greater degree of escalation.


Black Box testing and example

Testing for role/privilege manipulation
In every portion of the application where a user can create information in the database (e.g., making a payment, adding a contact, or sending a message), to receive information (statement of account, order details, etc.), or delete information (drop users, messages, etc.), it is necessary to record that functionality. The tester should try to access such functions as another user in order to verify, for example, if it is possible to access a function that should not be permitted by the user's role/privilege (but might be permitted as another user).

For example:

 POST /user/viewOrder.jsp HTTP/1.1


Verify if a user that does not belong to grp001 can modify the value of the parameters ‘gruppoID’ and ‘ordineID’ to gain access to that privileged data.

For example:
The following server's answer shows a hidden field in the HTML returned to the user after a successful authentication.

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Server: Netscape-Enterprise/6.0
Set-Cookie: USER=aW78ryrGrTWs4MnOd32Fs51yDqp; path=/; 
Cache-Control: no-cache
Pragma: No-cache 
Content-length: 247
Content-Type: text/html
Connection: close

<form  name=“autoriz" method="POST" action = “visual.jsp"> 
<input type="hidden" name="profilo" value="SistemiInf1">                                         
<body onload="document.forms.autoriz.submit()">

What if the tester modifies the value of the variable "profilo" to “SistemiInf9”? Is it possible to become administrator?

For example:
In an environment in which the server sends an error message contained as a value in a specific parameter in a set of answer's codes, as the following:

@0`1`3`3``0`UC`1`Status`OK`SEC`5`1`0`ResultSet`0`PVValido`-1`0`0` Notifications`0`0`3`Command  Manager`0`0`0` StateToolsBar`0`0`0`    

The server gives an implicit trust to the user. It believes that the user will answer with the above message closing the session. In this condition, verify that it is not possible to escalate privileges by modifying the parameter values. In this particular example, by modifying the `PVValido` value from '-1' to '0' (no error conditions), it may be possible to authenticate as administrator to the server.

Result Expected:
The tester should verify the execution of successful privilege escalation attempts.