$3 for 3 months. Save 90%.
$3 for 3 months. Save 90%.

Restore voting rights to ex-felons

Cynthia Tucker
Syndicated columnist
Cynthia Tucker


Even after men and women have served their time -- after they have paid their debt to society, as the cliche goes -- most states restrict their franchise. It's an odd idea: Those men and women are harmless enough to release onto the streets, but they can't be trusted to vote. They have finished serving their sentences, but they are barred from full citizenship.


It's undemocratic, it's unfair and it's un-American. While ancient Greek and Roman codes withdrew the franchise from those who had committed serious crimes, most Western countries now see those codes as outdated.

Recognizing that, Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, a Democrat, used his executive power earlier this month to sweep away his state's laws limiting the franchise for felons. With that action, about 200,000 convicted felons who have completed their prison time and finished parole or probation are now eligible to vote.

McAuliffe noted that Virginia's law -- one of the nation's harshest and embedded in a Civil War-era state constitution -- didn't hobble the voting rights of black citizens through mere coincidence. That was its purpose. McAuliffe's staff came across a 1906 report in which a then-state senator gloated about several voting restrictions, including a poll tax and literacy tests, that, he said, would "eliminate the darkey as a political factor in this state in less than five years," according to The New York Times.

You'd think that McAuliffe's fellow Virginia politicians, Republicans and Democrats alike, would celebrate his decision. Eliminating barriers to the franchise -- especially those with obviously racist roots -- can only polish the state's image and strengthen the civic fabric.

But GOP leaders have objected, accusing McAuliffe of "political opportunism" and a "transparent effort to win votes." Well, OK. Let's stipulate that politicians are usually in the business of trying to win votes.

Having conceded that, though, isn't restoring the voting rights of men and women who have served their time a good idea? If a crime renders a man beyond the boundaries of civilized society, he should be imprisoned for the rest of his life. Otherwise, his crime shouldn't place him in an inferior caste, without the privileges of full citizenship.

Curiously, though, many conservatives seem to disagree. After Democrat Steve Beshear, then Kentucky's governor, issued an executive order last year similar to McAuliffe's, his Republican successor, Matt Bevin, overturned it. Bevin signed a law allowing felons to petition judges to vacate their convictions -- a bureaucratic hurdle not easily overcome. Maryland's GOP governor, Larry Hogan, vetoed a bill to restore voting rights to felons, but the Democratically controlled legislature overrode him.


The real motivation for GOP lawmakers is to restrict the franchise from people unlikely to vote for them -- especially people of color and millennials. Rather than campaign on a platform that attracts support, they rely on barriers to voting.

That's wrong. The strength of American democracy depends on persuading more citizens that their votes count; carelessly -- or intentionally -- disenfranchising those with whom you disagree rends the civic fabric, distorts the political process and stokes the flames of discontent.

We surely don't need more of that in this political season.
