

© Miri WTPOTUS June 20, 2012  







Don’t worry. Be happy.  Share.



Remember, repeat after Barack: 

“Dreams are for Dreamers, not for you.”




They need those jobs more than you do.  















  1. Jack Cashill:

    “Maraniss Bio Deepens Obama Birth Mystery”

    “David Maraniss has no use for “birthers.” In a recent interview, he dismissed their beliefs as “preposterous” and wonders why they cling to them, since “every fact and document leads in another direction.”

    On the subject of the birth, the usually voluble Maraniss is as tight-lipped as he is on the wedding. He reports that Obama was born at 7:24 in the evening of August 4, 1961 at Kapi’olani Hospital. As reference, he cites “State of Hawaii Certificate of Live Birth,” presumably the unverified document posted online last April.

    In the way of confirmation, Maraniss offers only one story — an elaborate one that he takes two pages to tell. It comes down to this: a woman is having lunch shortly after Obama’s birth with an OB/GYN, who tells her, “Stanley had a baby. Now that’s something to write home about.”


    • This article was posted earlier this week but oddly enough, it’s dated today. So he must be printed in multiple places at different times. Anyway, a tidbit I didn’t note before: The Pratt daughter was a teenager when the Dunhams lived in her house, so she OUGHT TO KNOW A GREAT DEAL MORE about SAD, her baby, and the circumstances of its birth. Why doesn’t she tell more than that the baby didn’t live there and that it was a scandal?

      One wonders if SAD did give that child up for adoption and then later, when she wanted to send her possibly adopted-in-Indonesia child to the USA, she stole her own child’s identity for the adopted kid, to facilitate sending him to the USA.

  2. Lawrence Sellin:

    “A Stealth Coup d’État in the United States”




  3. I don’t have a subscription so I can’t read the article over on P&E, but what is Holder doing in Denmark? Something must be really rotten over there. Why is he at the UN and meeting with Unions? Why would the United States Attorney General be involved in this especially after he was just voted in contempt of Congress. What nastyness is Obummer and his mafia of thugs cooking up this time? CONGRESS GET OFF YOUR BUTTS AND DO SOMETHING!!!!! THIS WHOLE ADMINISTRATION IS TREASONOUS!

  4. Haven’t we just been lectured about how everyone should respect the president and the office of the president, in light of the brouhaha about that Daily Caller journalist having the gall to ask Obama a question? How about this? It’s Gay Pride Month (I suppose) and the “Pride” parades are going on around the country. In “honor” of them (what’s to be PROUD of, btw?) “gay activists” were invited to the WH by Obama. They repaid that honor by “flipping off” the portrait of President Ronald Reagan. When will WE “birthers” get invited? Can we have Birther Pride Month? It’s OUR HOUSE, TOO.


    • About the guy in the middle:


      • The Marine Band had to play while the gay guys danced with their male partners. Talk about making people CRAWL. Abuse of power. I can see Barry with his snarky smirk now.

        All the SuperPacs for Romney need to do now is blow up those photos and use them in campaign ads. Let ALL of America SEE for themselves what Obama and his supporters think of “respect” for the “office of the presidency”, for the American people, for the White House and what it means. I have no doubt at all that when Mooch dissed the flag and Barry nodded in agreement, that it truly WAS them dissing the flag and ALL IT STANDS FOR. This is as “IN YOUR FACE” as it gets. EVERY American, even all the gay ones, should be outraged.

        How would they react if “birthers” were invited to the WH by Barry’s successor, and we all went and flipped off HIS portrait? I AM SICK AND TIRED OF THIS DOUBLE STANDARD AND THE DISGUSTING COMPLICIT COVERING-UP DONE BY THE LAMESTREAM MEDIA. This happens, while the Marines are FORCED (do you think they had any choice) to play for this event.

        A president who “celebrates” sexuality. Did George Washington, in his wildest dreams, imagine this would be taking place in the People’s House?

        This woman, seen above flipping off Reagan, also is pictured kissing her girlfriend in front of his portrait. She wrote on the Web, “F*** Reagan”. The story also said, “Additionally, Strauss posted Reagan’s memorable statement on LGBT rights from the 1980 campaign trail:


        He got that right. But they’re going to shove it down our faces whether we like it or not. I’ve said it before: It’s NOT ENOUGH that people tolerate their behavior. They want to FORCE US to SAY, THINK, BELIEVE THAT IT’S NORMAL. TO ACCEPT AND CONDONE IT.

        They ask for tolerance, which they get, but they HAVE NO TOLERANCE for others.

        • I’m ready to vomit, now, What a Hoot. You know what? They would laugh if we did, or if we cried over this (which I also feel like doing, seeing such hatred in our country), just like those bullying middle-school kids in NY LAUGHED as Karen Klein, their 68-year-old school bus monitor, was bullied, ridiculed, and TORTURED by snotty adolescents who said the most despicable things to her that I have ever heard. They called her a fat pig, but that’s just the least of it. They ridiculed her for sweating, when she was crying; but they had no mercy when they learned that they had driven her to tears. No, it just set off another round of ridicule. They laughed about her mother being dead and then told her that she’ll be joining her mother soon. They talked about stabbing her. This is the kind of bullying HATRED that we see depicted there, in those photos. These “gay activists” are snotty adolescents. And worse. It’s worse because so is our potus, who WE’RE supposed to respect (and never question). OR ELSE.

    • http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/06/22/activists-photographed-flipping-bird-to-reagan-portrait-at-white-house/?test=latestnews

      The “White House” has “rebuked” the “guests” who acted so rudely. WELL, OF COURSE THEY REBUKE THEM. NOW. AFTER DRUDGE PUBLICIZED IT AND THEY KNOW HOW BAD IT’S GOING TO LOOK IN THOSE CAMPAIGN ADS THAT WILL JUST WRITE THEMSELVES. Actually, no writing required except for, “These are the gay guests Obama had at your White House, to “celebrate” gay pride.”

      The “White House” didn’t “approve” and they now agree that “behavior like this doesn’t belong anywhere, least of all in the White House.”

      So the question now is: Where were the Obamas when this was going on? Who else was in the room? No security? No guards? No WH staff, anywhere in the vicinity of those priceless portraits that belong to the People? So who said what to whom at the time? It doesn’t fly.

      Notice how, when OBL is killed, BARRY takes credit. When something negative happens, it’s the “White House” that issues the apologies and regrets.

      How exactly did the WH “rebuke” these people? By promising to NEVER let them set foot in our WH again?

      Btw, did you hear that the Dept. of State is investigating itself to figure out how they accidentally gave a visa to a member of a terrorist group so that he could (accidentally?) meet with officials in OUR WHITE HOUSE? http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/06/22/2863214/us-probes-visa-issued-to-egypt.html

      Gay activists can get into the WH to flip off President Reagan. Egyptian terrorists can get into the WH and State Dept. to meet with people we pay. But We the People can’t get an invite to eat Wagyu beef with the FLOTUS or hear Sir Paul McCartney sing. Is that “fair”?

    • guess they didn’t know that Ronald Reagan invited the first openly gay couple to stay in the White House – the WH interior decorater and his boyfriend for nancy’s 60th b-day.

  5. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/21/arts/television/fox-friends-finds-ratings-and-controversy.html?_r=2&pagewanted=all

    More proof that the Obama administration leans on and threatens any network or program that DARES to criticize him. Carney calls Fox and they dutifully REMOVE A VIDEO from their website. A video that criticized Obama. Just AS WE SUSPECTED. WHY DOES FOX THINK WE WILL CONTINUE TO WATCH THEM WHEN THEY KOWTOW AND CAPITULATE TO UNCONSTITUTIONAL WHITE HOUSE POLITICAL PRESSURE?

    They have better ratings than others BECAUSE they tell the truth (sometimes) or at least give another side of an issue, when NO OTHER NETWORK DOES.

  6. The sheer gall of it. Barry wants newlyweds to forgo that “gravy bowl” and instead have guests contribute to his gravy train:

    Gravy bowl?

  7. Another scandal, this with Axelrod, in the Wall Street Journal:


    The story quickly died, but emails recently released by the House Energy and Commerce Committee ought to resurrect it. The emails suggest the White House was intimately involved both in creating this lobby and hiring Mr. Axelrod’s firm—which is as big an ethical no-no as it gets.”


  8. Page 3: http://www.scribd.com/doc/97824831/TN-WDTN-LLF-2012-06-21-Memorandum-ORDER-DISMISSING-CASE

    Defendants assert that the Democratic Party of Tennessee has the right to nominate whoever it chooses to run as a candidate, including someone who is not qualified for the office.”

    Later on, they seem to say that the Court has to construe the Constitution “in favor of allowing the people to choose whomever they wish.” Now, if a judge accepts that, then that is a mighty large penumbra. How can you construe requirements listed in the Constitution in such a way as to allow anybody who doesn’t meet them to be chosen anyway, so long as the “people wish?”

    On page 5: “…the Tennessee Democratic Party will not actually certify that President Obama is qualified for office, only that he is the party’s nominee for office.”


  9. Couldn’t let a day pass without a few photos of that fashion icon, Chewbacca, and her collection of bondage belts.

    This ‘woMAN’ is beyond embarrassing to the office, the country and most of all, herself.

    Have the Tums ready…


  10. Thanks SueK, that really did the trick.

    I worked with the British in private life and in the military and have a great deal of respect for them. Much more so than, say, the unrestrained Ausies that I have met. Don’t get me wrong, the Brits can let it all hang out, too. But, my Word, could you ever imagine the “Iron Lady” Margaret Thatcher dressing in such a way? Stupid question, I know.

    It makes me respect British pomp and pageantry even more.

    I just wish someone had Churchill’s bust shoved up his……. 🙂

  11. The latest from Jack Cashill. And the hits just keep on coming. Now, he finds, Maraniss has edited Barry’s “war mentality” article from the Columbia Sundial to make it sound more erudite. http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/06/did_maraniss_commit_fraud_to_protect_obama.html

    “I returned to my office after lunch, checked a digitized copy of the article, and then double-checked a PDF of the original print edition. I was right. The passage had been edited to fix one of Obama’s signature errors, his chronic failure to get nouns and verbs to agree.

    Here is how the offending sentence appears in the Maraniss book: “But the states of war — the sounds and chill, the dead bodies — are remote and far removed.” (Italics mine.)

    Here is how the sentence appears in the original text: “But the taste of war — the sounds and chill, the dead bodies — are remote and far removed.” The sentence, of course, should read, “the taste … is.” This is one of an appalling five sentences in Obama’s 1,800-word essay in which the noun and verb do not agree.”


    “The Sundial article is Obama’s defining piece, his Rosetta Stone. The mistakes he makes — the random use of commas, the tortured sentence structure, the awkward participles, the inept word selection, and especially the misaligned nouns and verbs — reappear in his 1988 essay “Why Organize” and in a lengthy 1990 letter he wrote to the Harvard Law Record, the only other prose pieces before his 1995 memoir, Dreams from My Father, that bear his name.

    Let me explain why this matters. Obama wrote this article in the same school year he sent long-distance girlfriend Alex McNear a series of quasi-love letters, one of which was prominently excerpted in a Maraniss piece in the May issue of Vanity Fair.

    The letter impressed me as being much better-written than the Sundial article or any of Obama’s subsequent pieces. The punctuation, erratic in the Sundial essay, was impeccable in the letter. Then, too, the subject matter was sophisticated and well-removed from Obama’s expressed range of interests.”

    My conclusion, which is OBVIOUS, especially after Cashill points it all out for us: Obama wrote the crappy stuff; he did NOT write Dreams OR those love letters.

    Cashill now believes the letters are “documented” and exist, but he seems to now believe that they were similarly edited. Maraniss won’t show them in their ORIGINAL form (sound familiar?) to anyone. Did you know that before McNear was Barry’s “white girlfriend” she was editor of a student publication at Occidental and she rejected one of Barry’s submissions? He was “infuriated” and he called her “stupid”. Sounds like Barry. Sometimes, the truth comes out.

    Cashill ends his article this way: “I suppose the Sundial edit, like the umlaut, might have been made by an editing program and overlooked by Maraniss, but the duty to explain is now his. Otherwise, he stands accused of fraud.”

    Now what editing program turns “taste” into “states”? Same letters, but an extra s. Even so, I can’t imagine an editing program that would make such a suggestion or do it automatically. Maraniss will have some rationalization that sounds plausible, but isn’t true. OBOTS ALWAYS DO.

  12. Filmmaker Joel Gilbert: Obama’s Real Father Exposed!

    • Similarities: Teeth, age spots, both left handed. Obama’s speeches mirror writings by FMD, some nearly word for word. They called him BHO II, not junior, implying that the two are not father and son. Reiterates that Stan took Barry to see FMD several times a week, on Ann’s insistence. In other words, FMD helped raise Barry. He thinks the original bc says “father unknown”. BHO the Kenyan came to the USA to provide a black father for Barry to help him get the affirmative action set-aside scholarship to Punahou. FMD as his real father explains why so many of the commie muckety-mucks fawned over Barry, why he was pushed through Occidental, Columbia, Harvard.

      Jones and Gilbert say that Corsi concurs that Davis is the most likely father. Even more dangerous is that FMD is his IDEOLOGICAL father. There’s recapitulation of the Weather Underground plan to eliminate 25 million people who won’t be “reeducated” to communism. Corsi told Jones that he thinks this theory is accurate and Corsi is a former intelligence person.

      One thing I have to wonder is whether or not the entire Kenyan family has been fooled, too, or if they know.

      “Socialists leaders are always eugenicists who hate black people,” says Jones. Gilbert says they use blacks. Sanger and Obama used black people to “kill these weeds,” says Jones. Gilbert says communism is the globalists’ plan.

      Seems to me that Alex Jones does a very good Rush Limbaugh impersonation. 🙂

  13. It just gets stranger and stranger. 🙄

  14. Afterburner with Bill Whittle: Follow the Ideology


    h/t – http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2898699/posts

    • Yep. Mentioned that above. There’s a link to the document here: https://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2012/06/19/a-public-service-announcement-to-the-young-citizens-of-the-usa-from-their-uncle-sam/comment-page-2/#comment-86130

      btw, it seems to me that these plaintiffs could appeal the ruling on standing, all the way to the SCOTUS. It defies common sense that something INVENTED by courts (standing) can exclude every citizen from being able to ENFORCE the CLEAR ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS IN THE CONSTITUTION. How can it be that We the People have no way to ensure that the person who holds the highest office in the land, who has the most power in the entire world, is qualified for the job? Every person on the face of the Earth is affected by the POTUS. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standing_(law)#Standing_requirements

      This is as if they are admitting that a tyrant can not be challenged by anyone because he equally oppresses everyone. That makes NO SENSE, and if it doesn’t make sense, then it’s not right.

      • We need to move from suing to pressing criminal charges. We all need to start taking the evidence to the local sheriff. Crimes have been committed. When I suspect my neighbor of social security fraud and/or identity theft do I file a law suit against them? No. I contact the law. It is silly to be suing but of course I only see this now because hindsight is the only exacting science. And yes, I realize this is a very naive thought process.

  15. Wha is this about? Is the story of violence being “softened”? The article says one man who had possession of a gun is custody but it is not known his role in the shooting? Yet, they are still asking for witnesses to help identify/report those involved? So, are they holding in custody a LEGAL gun carrier? Who responded to the chaos? Was this really a mob act? Any one have more? Supposed to spend a long weekend in downtown Denver soon….

      • I thought that was a parody. A joke by somebody like Breitbart’s krewe. It’s serious. It’s seriously NAUSEATING! OMG. How do they think this is going to work? She couldn’t even remember that they had lunch and not dinner. Who believes this? Not I!

        How long before we come up with a competing version of their “first date”?

        They make it up as they go along. What are they going for? The over 60 crowd? I just don’t get it.

        What’s creepy is that underbite. How can she talk? Rowrrrrr.

        • AS PREDICTED! Two competing stories:


          “Editorial: Where Is Our Community Organizer-in-Chief?
          by the editors of Rethinking Schools
          For their first date, a young law intern named Barack Obama took his future wife to a meeting he was conducting in a church basement for poor, single, mostly African American mothers—an outgrowth of his work as a community organizer on Chicago’s South Side. As Michelle Obama recalls, the purpose of this meeting was to help these mothers see that it was “the job of ordinary people in organizing” to narrow the gap between “the world as it is and the world as it should be.”” Apparently from Fall 2009 publication, but don’t know when written.

          How romantic!!!

          http://www.oprah.com/world/Barack-and-Michelle-Obamas-First-Date-Famous-Firsts (FEBRUARY 2007 Oprah’s magazine)


          “This is a chocolate city” Who said that? 🙂 Oh, my. How they morph these tall tales. This gives you a taste of Barry’s skill with words and analogy. Shouldn’t it be, “The CURB doubling as our dinner table?” They had a dinner table that doubled as a curb? What a …

          What happened to the church meeting? Wait! In his second book, he claims they first went to a “firm picnic” and then came back and had the ice cream. So their first “date” was when they went to the company picnic TOGETHER. I’d call that a date and so did Barry (or whoever wrote the book for him). NO mention of the art museum or the Art Institue anywhere in the book. The Art Institute IS mentioned in his first book; Bill Ayers tells us that Barry took AUMA to the Art Institute, when she came to Chicago and they first met, AND Barry and AUMA spent the day together. Confusing his “sister” with his wife. Hmmmm. Tres bizarro.

          That was then. This is January 2009, right before the inauguration, and this sounds like the story they settled on, the details of which they had to REMIND each other in that recently released campaign ad:

          http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/01/02/michelle-obama-first-impr_n_154754.html GAG ALERT!!!! (It’s basically the same story: went to the Art Institute, lunch, Spike Lee movie, a drink at some high rise. But even in the ad, didn’t they start with DINNER? No dinner mentioned here at all. What happened to that chocolate ice cream? Gee, you’d think that first chocolatey kiss would be memorable. Nope! I’ll bet you anything we can find even more versions of this first date “story”.

      • One of their commenters linked to this: http://cryandhowl.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/lunch1.jpg

        Check it out. Mooch buys lobster hor d’oeuvres, two steamed lobsters, IRANIAN (what else?) caviar, and Bollinger champagne for lunch at the Waldorf. Cost? $447.39. Living large. While Rome burns. By design.

Leave a Reply


WordPress.com Logo


Google photo


Twitter picture


Facebook photo


Connecting to %s