This Is Why We Need Black Photographers to Document the Protests

This Is Why We Need Black Photographers to Document the Protests

As long as the protests are being documented, what does it matter if the people taking the photographs that we see in our newspapers are white?

On June 2, five of the U.S.A.’s largest newspapers featured photographs of the protests on their front pages. The New York Times, Los Angeles Times, USA Today, Washington Post, and The Wall Street Journal all featured dramatic imagery showing police in riot gear, children standing in front of murals, and tear gas. All of them were taken by male, non-black photographers. 

National Geographic’s Instagram feed showed a similar situation. A few days ago, there were around ten posts documenting the protests, of which one was taken by a person of color.

The first six posts on National Geographic's Instagram feed

The first six posts on National Geographic's Instagram feed, featuring photographes by Katie Orlinsky, John Stanmeyer, David Guttenfelder, Dina Litovsky, and Ismail Ferdous.

The protests mark what many hope will be a pivotal moment. Newspapers and agencies have their staffers, but, to paraphrase Vox photo editor Danielle A. Scruggs, if there was ever a time to hire black photographers to improve the reach and equality of representation of what’s happening on streets across the USA right now — this is it.

Photographs Shape Knowledge

The vast majority of Americans learn about the Civil Rights Movement through photographs, images published on major platforms that acquired a quiet power, shaping how events are perceived.  

If black representations of demands for social change do not become a true part of the record that determines our understanding, the archive will be incomplete. Social media might be full of images and clips that are in equal part alarming and inspiring, but this medium affords a degree of representation that is far less stable and far more ephemeral than mainstream publications. By contrast, the printed images acquire a currency of their own, revered by history books, helped along by the reinforcement of international competitions whose juries very often are predominantly not black, and celebrated on the walls of galleries and in the pages of coffee table books.

The Status Quo

Why are so few black people a part of the process of documenting the protest? Or, for that matter, part of how photographs are published in general? This is not a question of the chicken and the egg; there is a long-established status quo that is not overtly racist but has been shaped by an underlying, invisible system of discrimination that favors a certain type of person, whether it’s a simple fact of being able to afford a camera in the first place and then the time and space to learn a craft, to the guy handing out the internships being unconsciously more inclined to lean away from the woman with the black-sounding name at the top of her resume. A culture establishes itself, and it tends to like things the way it is.

Agencies and newsrooms tend to stick with a small selection of photographers, those who can be relied upon to throw themselves into any situation and document it objectively and without an agenda (to the extent that this is possible). This trust is essential to the quick delivery of images that could potentially guide public opinion, mold government policy, and create what will go on to become part of the historical record of critical events that shape a nation and beyond. It is for exactly these reasons that diversity is necessary and local representations are incorporated. It’s not that the view of the outsider, parachuting in heroically to capture daring images of violence and confrontation, is no longer valid; it’s that this view is incomplete. The existing crop of incredible photojournalists don’t need to be pushed aside; instead, space should be made for those who can tell the story from within.

With the democratization brought by the digital image, taking photographs is no longer the domain of a small, wealthy minority. By contrast, the systems that publish, venerate, and celebrate those photographs — thus granting them value — have yet to catch up. If there are few black photographers and photo editors with influential positions at publications and agencies today, it’s not because they’re not as talented or haven’t worked hard enough to achieve it; it’s because it’s not normal, and the current normal is a normality that resists change. Fortunately, the tens of thousands of people getting out in the streets are proof of the belief that a new and improved version of it can be achieved.

All of this matters because the telling of a story is not only about the story being told, but who is doing the telling. Who do we as a society, choose to empower to tell these stories, and why? There is an imbalance among the power structures that tell us who and what we are, and this could be the moment to redress it.

Finding Black Photographers

There are countless black photographers documenting the protests — and countless other things — but their work often remains unseen because they lack the visibility received by others. Here are some resources to help publications find images:

A large database of more than 300 black photographers documenting the protests has been compiled by Allison Davis ZauchaHaruka SakaguchiKate WarrenMaggie ShannonMichelle Groskopf, and Samantha Xu[The original version of this article mistakenly attributed this list to photographer Aaron Huey.]

Coinciding with this push for greater black visibility is a call for black female photographers to have their work published. A list of black female photographers is being compiled here by WomenPhotograph.

WomenPhotograph is also maintaining a database of major publications and the ratio of black and female photographers used in stories about the protests. ran a photographic feature that used the work of Black photographers.

(National Geographic recently added photographs by Ruddy Roye to its Instagram feed.)

If you have more resources, please post them in the comments below.

Log in or register to post comments


Previous comments
aurèle brémond's picture

Let's talk statistics (the rest is covered in the comment IMO) :
You quote CNN : % of images made by women: 13.2%
% of images made by Black photogs: 5.4%
% of images made by Black women photogs: 1.2%

As France did some labor statistics about gender among photographer : 75% are men and 25% women. We can reasonably think its more or less the same in the US.

So, when you think of it, CNN delcares 13.2% of the pictures are made by women who represent only 24% of all photographers. It's not a perfect score (far from it) but it shows that CNN is pretty much still picking a big part of the content produced by women.

Stats can say whatever we want them to say so, be very carefull using it ;)

Eric Crudup's picture

As soon as I saw the headline, I knew the comments would be a s**t show, filled with vitriol from the old, white, conservative demographic that normally comments on Fstopper articles. Many have not even read the article.

A good portion of them are against the protests, but won't say that explicitly.

Very few of the are interesting in any way.

David Pavlich's picture

You assume a lot. I'm the old white guy that said that we need OBJECTIVE PHOTOGRAPHERS AND JOURNALISTS. Do you disagree with that? I'm as Libertarian as it gets and will defend peaceful protests regardless the reason. However, being Libertarian, I also believe in Property Rights. Throwing a brick through a business's window that has nothing to do with what happened in Minneapolis is not protesting, it's breaking the law first and foremost.

David Penner's picture

Instead of looking for photos just look for one of the dozens of people that are live streaming all day from the protests. People on youtube are actually streaming a bunch of them to one video feed so you can see what is going on around the country.

Timothy Roper's picture

Large institutions and the demographics of their photographers hardly seem relevant here. A black person took the video of George Floyd's killing, and black people have taken many millions more photos and videos during the protests for social media. Does it really matter that much what the NYT is doing?

Julio Ibarra's picture

Dear Mr. Andy Day:

I usually stay away from ever commenting on anyone's writing. Color does not matter in any way, shape, or form. Sincerely, with all due respect to you and FStoppers, your article is undoubtedly racist, and you have not done enough comprehensive research on all the photographers that were and are documenting history.

I understand that you are under the assumption that you are helping the cause, but it is the undertone racist writing that is the issue with our society that it reflects poorly.

Why is it that every single person wants and has a need to see the color of a person? We need equality; we need to stay united and fight together to remain strong, regardless of who documents the events.

Pardon, but I desire to add an example, Julio Cortez is an AP Photojournalist, who I know, is not white.

Best regards,
Julio A. Ibarra Borroto
Retired Photojournalist from AP and The New York Times

Mike vessels's picture

Travelportalonline is a travel technology company that provides various online travel sales channel B2B travel portal, B2C travel portal, B2B2C travel portal, however, these B2C travel portal can integrate into various APIs for flights, hotels, cars, transfers for real-time inventory. We have an incredible experience in providing services to our customers within the time frame at affordable rates.

the dikiz's picture

Do you see the french society you live in with such racialist views?

Ryan Wilson's picture

With the progress in technology, it’s only a matter of time before the photographers ethnicity is part of the metadata....

Jason Do's picture

Only SJW will question the skin color of a photographer and not realize that question in and of itself is ridiculously racist, one in their right mind should ask such question when viewing a photograph. By the way, you know what else is the status quo? A black person is 11 times more likely to get killed by another black than a white. Of all the black homicide cases in 2018 in the US, 89% are committed by another black person, go look it up. Unless anyone can explain how 'systemic racism' leads to such high rate of black on black crime, I don't see this BLM movement bringing any real change for the better.

The quality of articles on this website is getting worse by the day. At this point I think I'll just save myself from the disappointment by never reading another one.

Deleted Account's picture

SJWs are racist.

Proceeds to be racist by virtue of gross misepresentation.


Let me spell this out for you. Impoverished communities (anywhere and in all historical periods) have disproportionately high rates of crime; this crime generally impacting their own cohort and community. So yes, high rates of crime within the African American community is directly a consequence of generations of disadvantage.