The World According To Genesis Vs The World According To NASA








Tags: , , , , , , , ,

4 Responses to “The World According To Genesis Vs The World According To NASA”

  1. Alexandra Spears (Alexandra1973) Says:

    I believe in the geocentric model but a flat earth, not so much. In Antarctica Polaris can’t be seen. And what about the midnight sun and polar night? “Four corners” refers to north south east west. Moo

    • T&L-M Says:

      According to biblical scriptures, the sun, stars, and the moon are the ones orbiting the earth. Think of it as lights on top of a moving dome ceiling as its done in a museum called “Planetarium”.


    Acts 11:5 I was in the city of Joppa praying: and in a trance I saw a vision, A certain vessel descend, as it had been a great sheet, let down from heaven by (four corners); and it came even to me:
    Revelation 7:1 And after these things I saw four angels standing on the (Four corners of the earth), holding the four winds of the earth, that the wind should not blow on the earth, nor on the sea, nor on any tree.


    26 And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all (the face of the earth), and hath determined the times before appointed, and (the bounds of their habitation) NOT A GALAXY FAR FAR AWAY!;
    27 That they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him, and find him, though (he be not far from every one of us):

  3. Mayank Barad Says:

    Would you not agree that one learns by example? A bird learns to fly just as its mother. It cannot learn by leaping into the air by its own. The kids that are born in a part of the world will learn only what their parents speak. A person in England will not start to speak French; his/her language will come from parents, who speak English. The baby OBSERVES others. Just as babies learn to do things by observation of example, people must learn through observation of example. In fact, this is how you learned about the things needed to write your article. You learned by example how to read and write. I should point out that learning through observation and example is the fundamental basis of the scientific community. You have just tried to disprove the basis of learning, which you follow, by calling the scientific community Satanists in paragraph 6. These people conduct proper research by observing the effect of certain conditions. Heck, even you could perform science if you wanted to. If the scientific community were to convince you that there is no god, then how could they convince you to believe in Satan? They are instead highlighting the basic principles of reasonable learning.

Leave a Reply to AVENUE OF LIGHT Cancel reply


WordPress.com Logo


Google photo


Twitter picture


Facebook photo


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: