ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource

ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource

ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource

Cause: Transactions deadlocked one another while waiting for resources.

Action: Look at the trace file to see the transactions and resources involved. Retry if necessary.

ORA-00060 error indicates that a dead lock occurred due to a resource contention with another session and Oracle rolled back your current statement to resolve the dead lock. The other session can proceed further as usual . Your current sessions rolled backed statements needs to be resubmitted for the execution after the required resources are available.

These dead locks can occur in different scenarios: They can occur while doing parallel DML operations, while updating/deleting data from same tables from different sessions , while performing transactions on bitmap index tables and so on but the mentioned scenarios are the most common ones.

At this point I think we would like to explore more about dead locks, so here are the in depth details on dead locks:

What is dead lock, when it occurs and how to fix it?

Dead lock occurs when two or more users waiting for the resources locked by each other. The users are stuck and they can not proceed as they may end up waiting indefinitely for the resources form each other. So when this condition occurs these users are stuck (deadly embraced) and cannot continue processing.

Oracle automatically detects deadlocks and resolves them by rolling back one of the transactions/statements involved in the deadlock, thus releasing one set of resources/data locked by that transaction. The session that is rolled back will observe Oracle error: ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource. Oracle will also produce detailed information in a trace file under database's UDUMP directory.

Most commonly these deadlocks are caused by the applications that involve multi table updates in the same transaction and multiple applications/transactions are acting on the same table at the same time. These multi-table deadlocks can be avoided by locking tables in same order in all applications/transactions, thus preventing a deadlock condition.

In the following example I am demonstrating a dead lock scenario . In the first session ie. session1 lock table: CUSTOMER then CONTACT; and in session2: CONATCT then CUSTOMER.

Here is an example of how to simulate a deadlock error:

Session 1 lock table CUSTOMER:
SQL> update customer set concatenate_bills_boo = 'T' where customer_ref = '10000000000000000486';

1 row updated.

Session 2 lock table CONTACT:

SQL> update contact set language_id = 8 where customer_ref = '10000000000000000486';

1 row updated.

Session 1 now update CONTACT. The session will hang waiting for a lock (not a deadlock yet!):


Session 2 now update CUSTOMER, causing the deadlock:

ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource


Resolution/Fix for deadly Embrace Dead Lock:

The session on which ORA-00060 occurred encountered the dead lock and Oracle automatically rolled back the statement that caused the dead lock. No other session got affected, so other sessions functions as usual.

In the affected session, the rolled back statement needs to be re-executed once the resources are available ie. When no other session is competing for the same resource.

Probably it will be a good idea to analyze oracle trace file and then modify the application to avoid this situation.

To avoid deadly embrace dead locks, review the application transaction logic thoroughly in the design phase it-self and ensure tables are ordered with in the transactions/applications in such a way that resource contention not occurs among transactions/applications.

In order to find the lock information from the database on which objects / tables have locked currently, which are the blocking sessions and users, ,you can find lot of useful information and scripts at ORA-00054 resource busy error article.

ITL shortage deadlocks :

ITL shortage deadlocks are those dead locks ORA-00060 errors that occur during the execution of UPDATE and DELETE statements where two processes wait for 'S' mode locks on each other's 'TX' enqueues. This cannot happen with INSERT statements, as Oracle doesn't wait on ITL (Interested Transaction List) slots for inserts, it will simply try to insert the row into the next available block.

Resolution/Fix for ITL Dead locks:

To resolve ITL dead locks , recreate the segment with higher INITTRANS and/or PCTFREE values. This will allow more space in the data blocks for Oracle to allocate more transaction entries (24 bytes at a time) when required.

Monitoring ITL waits :

Query the sys.v_$segment_statistics view for identifying and monitoring ITL waits per segments

Other causes for Dead Locks:

Bitmap indexes and dead locks:

High transaction activity on tables with bitmap indexes often causes dead locks. Bitmap indexes are only appropriate in read only/ read mostly environments.

Resolution to Bitmap Index dead locks:

This can be resolved by setting a very high INITTRANS value for the bitmap index but most cases it would be better & best to disable the index before heavy transactional activity, and to rebuild it after heavy transactional activity is done.

Additional dead lock related information :

Bitmap dead lock related info:

You can find more details on bitmap indexes and how they trigger dead locks at asktom by Thomas Kyte.

ITL Waits :

The following is very insightful article on ITL by Arup Nanda with some scripts for identifying the ITL waits.. Originally I thought to provide a link to this article but later I felt this article is very important , informative so I didn’t want the readers to miss/lose this info if that link changed by chance. So I am providing the article inline here with a sole purpose of making the freely available information on the internet in a readily usable form.

Here is the article on ITL:

“Oracle Interested Transaction List (ITL) Waits
by Arup Nanda
Author of Oracle Privacy Security Auditing

What is ITL? Ever wondered how Oracle locks rows on behalf of transactions? In some RDBMS vendor implementations, a lock manager maintains information on which row is locked by which transaction. This works great in theory, but soon the lock manager becomes a single point of contention, as each transaction must wait to get a lock from the manager and then wait again to release the lock.

This severely limits the scalability of the applications. In fact, application developers of some RDBMS products despise holding locks for a long time, and often resort to a full table lock when all that's needed is to get a few rows locked. This creates further waits, and consequently, scalability suffers.

So how is that different in Oracle? For starters, there is no lock manager. When a row is locked by a transaction, that information is placed in the block header where the row is located. When another transaction wishes to acquire the lock on the same row, it has to travel to the block containing the row anyway, and upon reaching the block, it can easily tell that the row is locked from the block header. There is no need to queue up for some single resource like a lock manager. This makes applications immensely scalable.

So, what portion of the block header contains information on locking? It is a simple data structure called "Interested Transaction List" (ITL), a linked list data structure that maintains information on transaction address and rowid. ITL contains several slots or place holders for transactions. When a row in the block is locked for the first time, the transaction places a lock in one of the slots with the rowid of the row that is locked. In other words, the transaction makes it known that it is interested in the row (hence the name "Interested Transaction List").

When the same transaction or another one locks another row, the information is stored in another slot, and so on. After a transaction ends via commit or a rollback, the locks are released and so are the slots that were used to mark the blocks, and these newly freed slots are reused for the other transactions. So there is in fact a queue, but it's at a block level, not at the entire database level or even at a segment level.

The next logical question that comes up is, how many slots are typically available? During the table creation, the INITRANS parameter defines how many slots are initially created in the ITL. When the transactions exhaust all the available slots and a new transaction comes in to lock a row, the ITL grows to create another slot. The ITL can grow up to the number defined by the MAXTRANS parameter of the table, provided there is space in the block.

Nevertheless, if there is no more room in the block, even if the MAXTRANS is high enough, the ITL cannot grow.

So, what happens when a transaction does not find a free slot to place its lock information? This can occur because either (i) the block is so packed that the ITL cannot grow to create a free slot, or (ii) the MAXTRANS has already been reached. In this case, the transaction that needs to lock a row has to wait until a slot becomes available. This wait is termed as ITL waits and can be seen from the view v$session_wait, in which the session is waiting on an event named "enqueue." Since the INITRANS is one, there is only one slot for the ITL. The rest of the block is empty.

Then another transaction, Txn2, updates the row Row2 and wants to lock the row. However, there are no more slots in the ITL available to service the transaction. The MAXTRANS entry is 11, meaning the ITL can grow up to 11 slots and the block has empty space. Therefore, ITL can grow by another slot and Slot number two is created and allocated to Txn2 (refer to figure 4).

Now the empty space in the block is severely limited, and it will not be able to fit another ITL slot. If at this time another transaction comes in to update the row three, it must have a free slot in the ITL. The MAXTRANS is 11 and currently only two slots have been created, so another one is possible; but since there is no room in the block to grow, the slot can't be created. Therefore, the Txn3 has to wait until either of the other transactions rolls back or commits and the slot held by it becomes free. At this time the session will experience an ITL waits event as seen from the view V$SESSION_WAIT.

To better illustrate the concept, let's illustrate such waits using a case. Create the following table and then populate it with several rows. Note MAXTRANS value.

FOR I IN 1..10000 LOOP

Now update a row of the table from one session, but do not commit it.

From another session, update row number two and do not update it.

This session will wait. Why? It's updating a row for COL1 = 2, not the same row updated in the other session for COL1 = 1. So why is the session waiting? It's because the first transaction occupied the only available ITL slot. The second transaction needed another slot to place its lock information, but since the MAXTRANS I defined is one, the ITL could not grow to create another slot. Thus, the latter transaction has to wait until the former session releases the lock and makes the slot available. Now increase the MAXTRANS of the table by issuing


and redo the above test. The second session will not wait this time because the ITL had enough free slots for both transactions. How to Reduce ITL WaitsThe primary cause of ITL waits is that free slots in the ITL are not available. This can be due to low setting of the MAXTRANS, which places a hard limit on the number of transactions that can have locks on a block or, the block is so packed that there is no room for the ITL to grow OR or both.

Therefore, setting a high value of INITRANS will make sure that there are enough free slots in the ITL, and there will be minimal or no dynamic extension of the ITL. However, doing so also means that there is less space in the block for actual data, increasing wasted space.

The other option is to making sure the data is less packed so that ITL can grow enough to accommodate the surges in ITL. This can be done by increasing PCTFREE, increasing FREELISTS and FREELIST GROUPS parameters for a table.

This will make a block hold less data and more room for the ITL to grow. As a direct result of the reduction in packing, the table will experience fewer buffer busy wait events, and performance will be increased.
How to Diagnose the ITL WaitHow do you know that a segment is experiencing ITL waits? The best answer will be found in the Segment Level Statistics provided in Oracle9i Release 2. To check for ITL waits, set up the STATISTICS_LEVEL to TYPICAL in init.ora or via ALTER SYSTEM, then examine the segment statistics for the waits.

VALUE > 0;

This unearths the objects that were subjected to ITL waits since the start up of the instance. Note that this view resets when the instance bounces. (For a more detailed explanation of this view and how to set it up, please refer to the article by this author here in DBAzine.)
In versions earlier than 9i, checking for ITL waits is tricky.

When you suspect that a database is suffering from these waits, query the view v$session_wait. If the event on which the system is waiting is "enqueue," then the session might be experiencing ITL waits. However, enqueue is a very broad event that encompasses any type of locks, so it does not accurately specify the ITL waits. When the wait event is experienced, issue the following complex query:

Select s.sid SID,
s.serial# Serial#,
l.type type,
' ' object_name,
lmode held,
request request
from v$lock l, v$session s, v$process p
where s.sid = l.sid and
s.username <> ' ' and
s.paddr = p.addr and
l.type <> 'TM' and
(l.type <> 'TX' or l.type = 'TX' and l.lmode <> 6)
select s.sid SID,
s.serial# Serial#,
l.type type,
object_name object_name,
lmode held,
request request
from v$lock l, v$session s, v$process p, sys.dba_objects o
where s.sid = l.sid and
o.object_id = l.id1 and
l.type = 'TM' and
s.username <> ' ' and
s.paddr = p.addr
select s.sid SID,
s.serial# Serial#,
l.type type,
'(Rollback='||rtrim(r.name)||')' object_name,
lmode held,
request request
from v$lock l, v$session s, v$process p, v$rollname r
where s.sid = l.sid and
l.type = 'TX' and
l.lmode = 6 and
trunc(l.id1/65536) = r.usn and
s.username <> ' ' and
s.paddr = p.addr
order by 5, 6

The output of the query will look something like this:

36 8428 TX 0 4
36 8428 TM TAB1 3 0
52 29592 TM TAB1 3 0
52 29592 TX (Rollback=RBS1_6) 6 0

Note how the sessions 36 and 52 both have a TM (DML) lock on the table TAB1 of type 3 (Row Exclusive), but session 52 also holds a TX (Transaction) lock on the rollback segment of mode 6 (Exclusive) and Session 36 is waiting for a mode 4 (Share) lock. If this combination of locking occurs, you can be sure that session 36 is waiting for ITL on the table TAB1. Beware of a similar but different diagnosis when two sessions try to insert the same key value (a real locking – primary key violation). In that case, you would also see an additional TX lock on a rollback segment from the session that is waiting; for ITL waits, this TX lock on the rollback segment would not be seen.

Needless to say, this is a rather convoluted and inaccurate way to diagnose the ITL waits in pre-Oracle9i Release 2 versions.

What INITRANS Value is Optimal? Conversely, how do you know if the INITRANS setting is too high and the space is just being wasted? Ascertaining this is possible by using a few random block dumps from the segment in question. First, find out the header file# and header block# of the segment by issuing the following query:


Use the output of the query to do a block dump of the header block.

This will produce a trace file in the USER_DUMP_DESTINATION directory. Open the trace file and find out the section on extent control via the following:
Extent Control Header


Extent Header:: spare1: 0 spare2: 0 #extents: 1 #blocks: 10

last map 0x00000000 #maps: 0 offset: 2080

Highwater:: 0x02011f87 ext#: 0 blk#: 0 ext size: 10

#blocks in seg. hdr's freelists: 0

#blocks below: 0

mapblk 0x00000000 offset: 0


Map Header:: next 0x00000000 #extents: 1 obj#: 53689 flag: 0x40000000

Extent Map


0x02011f87 length: 10

Find out the real number of blocks for the segment from dba_segments via the following:


Say this returns 12, and the #blocks shows 10; this means the first two blocks are header blocks; the data starts at the third block. Take a dump of the third block, which is obtained by adding two to the header block# obtained above.

This will produce another trace file in the USER_DUMP_DEST directory. If you issued it during the same session as above, then the trace will be written in the trace file opened earlier. Open the file and locate the following section.
buffer tsn: 8 rdba: 0x02011f88 (8/73608)

scn: 0x0000.389b8d81 seq: 0x01 flg: 0x04 tail: 0x8d810601

frmt: 0x02 chkval: 0x2ef5 type: 0x06=trans data

Block header dump: 0x02011f88

Object id on Block? Y

seg/obj: 0xd1ad csc: 0x00.389b8d81 itc: 4 flg: - typ: 1 - DATA

fsl: 0 fnx: 0x0 ver: 0x01

Itl Xid Uba Flag Lck Scn/Fsc

0x01 0x0003.003.000024cc 0x00804067.050a.13 C-U- 0 scn 0x0000.389b304e

0x02 0x0007.010.00002763 0x00801f49.0453.01 C--- 0 scn 0x0000.389b2628

0x03 0x0002.00a.000025d5 0x00804d42.04b2.25 C--- 0 scn 0x0000.389b2811

0x04 0x0006.006.00002515 0x00800962.03c8.18 CU 0 scn 0x0000.389b3044

This shows some very important information on the block, especially in the ITL section shown above. This table has an INITRANS entry of four, so there are four lines, one each per the ITL. The Flag column above the flag -U- indicates that the particular ITL was used. In this case, only two of the ITLs were used, and the other two were never used. However, this is the case for this block only. By selecting block dumps from other randomly selected blocks, you could have an idea how many ITLs are actually used. Then you may decide to reduce the INITRANS.

Automatic Block Management in Oracle9iIn Oracle9i, the process of space mangement inside a block is somewhat changed due to the introduction of the Automatic Block Management (ABM) feature, also known as Automatic Segment Space Management (ASSM). The option is specified at the tablespace level in the storage parameter as SEGMENT SPACE MANAGEMENT AUTO. For instance, the tablespace TS1 can be created as


SEGMENT SPACE MANAGEMENT AUTO;The last line of this code does the magic. In the ABM mode, Oracle maintains a bitmap for each segment with the information on the block. A bitmap is a data structure with a bit representing each block. When a block becomes available for INSERT, the information is made available simply by setting the corresponding bit in the bitmap rather than using freelists.

So, what does this have to do with ITL waits? The very cause of ITL waits is not freespace management, but the unavailability of a slot in ITL waits. So you still have to look for ITL waits and correct them using INITRANS and MAXTRANS. In fact, the problem may become exacerbated because the block becomes quite packed following an efficient space management system, and that may lead to lack of space for ITL growth. You can prevent this by keeping a large INITRANS for the segment.

Proper setting of INITRANS and MAXTRANS and packing of the blocks is vital to avoid ITL waits in Oracle. It's interesting to note that locking doesn't cause waits, but rather, the mechanism for locking as well as and poor planning. However, the good news is that this situation can be easily fixed by reorganizing the table and adding more slots to the Interested Transaction List.”


Dead locks do occur in most of the applications and dead locks can be avoided by properly designing the transactions and applications by keeping other transactions and applications in mind. ITL waits and dead locks related to ITL waits can be avoided by setting of INITRANS and MAXTRANS properly. Dead locks during the transactions on bitmap indexed tables can be avoided by performing heavy transactions with no bitmap indexes and after completing the transactions rebuild the bitmap indexes.

I hope you enjoyed the dead lock information and content of this article.

-Mendu, Oracle OCP

Search Results

User login