Dismiss this pinned window
top 200 commentsshow all 286

[–]Zylver314 1850 points1851 points  (22 children)

Nope... vs. NAW!

[–]Mutt1223 485 points486 points  (15 children)

I’m good... vs. CHECK PLEASE!

[–]kappamale 274 points275 points  (14 children)


[–]JayMeadows 115 points116 points  (13 children)

I'll challenge that... vs. IS THAT A CHALLENGE!?

[–]KronicNuisance 56 points57 points  (12 children)

Dope! vs. Nope!

[–]cobracoral 20 points21 points  (11 children)

No you don't vs no you didn't!

[–]MrDrDad 9 points10 points  (10 children)

No thank you vs. I'll pass on this one.

[–]KronicNuisance 8 points9 points  (9 children)

Hefty no thank you vs. Hard no

[–]Gesus8 5 points6 points  (7 children)

I’m good vs. ahhhh shit

[–]JezusCrustPizza 11 points12 points  (6 children)

Understand men vs understanding females

[–]Ken_Spiffy_Jr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Someone serve this person a friggin Puppers.

[–]ArguablyTired 56 points57 points  (3 children)

No seriously ill just fly around until tomorrow it's fine

[–]warlord_mo 10 points11 points  (2 children)

Out of gas you say? That’s why we have parachutes right?

[–]ScoobyRT 51 points52 points  (0 children)

It’s an attractive option when the ‘other’ is the middle of the ocean.

[–]xenta101 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I was wondering who was turning the lights out

[–]pastdancer 1195 points1196 points  (43 children)

Absolutely insane, both ways. Those pilots... How do they fit in the cockpits of those planes with their gigantic balls?

[–]Yes-its-really-me 1382 points1383 points 3 (21 children)

The cockpits are open underneath and the balls are supported under the wings. They look like fuel tanks, but they're really not.

It's just the man's cock left in there, that's where the name cockpit comes from. True fact. Possibly.

Edit: 4 shiny awards!! Thank you folks. I'm gonna be jangling like Mr T on a bouncy castle!

[–]pastdancer 135 points136 points  (3 children)

Ohhh, I see. It’s all coming together for me now.

[–]furaiboi 68 points69 points  (2 children)

Or is it all cumming together for you?

[–]Comic_Smith 7 points8 points  (1 child)

Let’s cum together... right now... over me...


The balls are the fuel tanks

These planes are nut powered

[–]regulatorDonCarl 21 points22 points  (0 children)

That’s nuts

[–]swimmiestf1sh 11 points12 points  (4 children)

Fuel is stored in the balls

[–]nunyuhbiznis 2 points3 points  (3 children)

i thought pee was stored in the balls.

[–]AndyB16 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Til: planes run on pee.

[–]Indica_420 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“I think it was a male plane”

[–]jwrizzle82 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Actually, as soon as pilots get comfortable with this shit, they are discharged as their balls are too big for the jet to carry safely.

[–]justsomedoctor 11 points12 points  (0 children)

The kinda knowledge you only get on reddit

[–]tomhoq 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Looks like we found our king

[–]InternetUserNumber1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Fuel is stored in the balls

[–]RealMcNuggets 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah that was proven by NASA maybe.. Probably

[–]nevermind-stet 96 points97 points  (5 children)

I was a Navy pilot, and I always thought carrier landings were very easy.

(I flew helicopters)

[–]StDeath 27 points28 points  (0 children)

I worked as an AT worked on the Automatic carrier landing system (ACLS) for the fixed wing guys. They had to use it at least once as a confidence check. Imagine putting your trust into a small electrical box to safely land the plane on the carrier.....

[–]falcon_driver 15 points16 points  (3 children)

You gotta be shitting me. When the deck is heaving, how do you set it down? At the bottom of the motion? The top?

[–]nevermind-stet 22 points23 points  (2 children)

Once you get used to landing on frigates and cruisers in heavy seas, carriers are like landing on an open field

[–]falcon_driver 15 points16 points  (1 child)

Holy crap, man. I've seen video of you guys landing on smaller craft in "total bastard" seas. I just figured you're all dead by now, because that's supernatural control right there.

[–]nevermind-stet 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Ships will rock and roll underneath you. Just hover steady with the horizon and recognize when the ship settles down for a couple seconds and put it down. Experience + patience.

[–]ikenewton11 5 points6 points  (0 children)

"If what's between my legs had a hand on it, I guarantee I could have landed this ship."

[–]RedBaron180 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Naval Aviators.

[–]Joe0991 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s why’s it’s called the cockpit. It was going to be called the ballpit but that was already taken

[–]UnseenCapybara 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It doesn't, you know the "landing gear" that comes out of the bottom of the plane?

[–]Posted_For_5_Karma 492 points493 points  (39 children)

I greatly underestimated how fast an aircraft like that could slow and completley stop

[–]Mjolnir12 345 points346 points  (34 children)

They have cables that the plane grabs on to that slows the planes down VERY fast. They aren't relying entirely on the braking abilities of the plane.

[–]SoDakZak 109 points110 points  (0 children)

That’s just Mitch’s G-string

[–]NetworkMachineBroke 95 points96 points  (0 children)

And when they land, they push the throttle to 100% just in case they have to take off again.

[–]locohighroller 60 points61 points  (19 children)

Does anyone know how many Gs the pilot experience during a rapid deceleration like that? Seems like it would make your eyes pop out.

[–]Joe0991 62 points63 points  (1 child)

They just close them, their eyelids hold them in

[–]lattestcarrot159 27 points28 points  (9 children)

Not very many, the guy who was in charge of making sure ejection seats were safe constantly rode in a rocket car. Once he pulled 40+ Gs after stopping in a fraction of a second after going something stupid like 600+ mph or something. Don't quote that speed. Humans are actually really tolerant to Gs if we are held down in the right places. Watch today I found out on where Murphy's law came from. And no there guy isn't Murphy but was the one who brought it to the public lol.

Edit: video I was talking about

[–]OppositeStick 13 points14 points  (3 children)

40+ G's

Woudn't that be a record?


Kittenger ... the g-forces at his extremities having been calculated to be over 22 times the force of gravity, setting another record.

[–]lattestcarrot159 14 points15 points  (2 children)

I over estimated, it was 38Gs Colonel John Stapp is who I was talking about. Iirc Kittinger had Stapp clear him for a flight when people thought he had broken ribs.

[–]GenAnon 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Looks like 46.2 Gs was his max. And I get a headache when I gun it in my Prius...

[–]lattestcarrot159 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah so I was right! And do drink enough water? XD

[–]ThatsNotCoolBr0 8 points9 points  (1 child)

Humans can survive more G’s horizontally (back and forth) We can’t survive many G’s vertically (up and down). When too many G’s are experienced vertically, the aortic valve tends to dissect.

[–]lattestcarrot159 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes, which is why Stapp was fine after his experiments.

[–]AlexisTF 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Also I believe if Gs are experienced for really short amounts of time they can be more easily handled

[–]lattestcarrot159 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Hmmm first I've heard of that will have to look into it.

[–]AreWeThenYet 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wish to know this as well

[–]Caleo 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Fewer than they experience while performing aggressive maneuvers at high speeds.

[–]osbstr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You mean like G-Unit? Think they’re all pretty G, G, G-UNIT!

[–]BubonicAnnihilation 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sa sa belter need that juice to survive the burn

[–]48199543330 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Definitely more that the number of Gs it takes me to stand up from a seated position.

Source: a light headed gentleman

[–]falcon_driver 16 points17 points  (2 children)

On some those cables ram conical pistons into cylinders of water, providing gradual, though very rapid slowing. From a Grisham book, so

[–]Professor_Doctor_P 3 points4 points  (1 child)

That would result in a decreasing force as the plane slows, you'd want a constant force.

[–]falcon_driver 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Are you sure? I think it would be constant force because as the tip enters, it has tremendous velocity, which it trades for greater circumference as it displaces the water. I think the math would work out. But - either it's total fiction from that author, or he based his description on the real thing.

[–]unsatknifehand 9 points10 points  (1 child)

I remember the first time I saw a jet miss the arresting cable on a carrier and he bounced off the deck and kept flying straight through. That Shit made my heart sink.

[–]skarface6 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I can’t imagine. I’m guessing everyone would suddenly dry gulp.

[–]Posted_For_5_Karma 4 points5 points  (0 children)

ahh see that makes sense, also adding a reason to the list of "why anon is not an engineer"

[–]purplehaze216 3 points4 points  (2 children)

I don’t know how long ago this was and can’t fact check it, but once heard a claim that if we had a material with the same strength to weight ratio of a spider web, the cable needed on aircraft carriers to stop a plane would be the diameter of a No 2 pencil. Anyone able to confirm?

[–]DonnerPartyPicnic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You dont use the brakes at all when taking a trap. You'll blow a tire if you do.

[–]Triple96 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Similarly, during takeoff, those same hooks and cables are used to "slingshot" the planes up to speed enough to safely take off, given the limited runway space. Super neat stuff.

[–]chris_bro_pher 18 points19 points  (0 children)

It’s wild too because they open throttles more in case they miss the wire so they can properly take off on the other side. It’s very strange to be a passenger when landing on a carrier

[–]BluEch0 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There’s an external mechanism that makes it possible, the flip side is that the quick slowing often causes pilots to get bruises from their “seat belt” harnesses due to the extreme acceleration during landing.

And nevermind the stresses the planes themselves have to be built to endure

[–]Crookmeister 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There is a cable running transversally that the plane goes across and it grabs them. Same with take off. They are slingshotted by a cable so they get enough speed for lift within the short distance of the carrier.

[–]82ndAbnVet 240 points241 points  (12 children)

Now imagine this but in 1943. Respect!

[–]unsatknifehand 118 points119 points  (4 children)

We were told the NAMP (Naval aviation maintenance program) in the US navy was written in blood. All guys that pioneered the field of aviation before us had some massive balls..

[–]DonnerPartyPicnic 13 points14 points  (3 children)

Same thing with NATOPS

[–]LickNipMcSkip 24 points25 points  (2 children)

that just sounds like night ops with a redneck accent

[–]warblade7 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Now imagine this but being the first person to ever do it. Crazy!

[–]Obrien_r 12 points13 points  (4 children)

Modern pilots have a lot more help too.

ILS, or Instrument Landing System, or the “Bullseye.” This is an aircraft system that receives glideslope, azimuth, and elevation signals that are converted into “fly-to” indications (needles) on the pilot's Heads-Up Display (HUD). Then an additional system called the Automatic Carrier Landing System (ACLS) locks onto the aircraft and provides similar information.

[–]cmrattray 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Yeah, but they are operating at much higher speeds. The stall speed of those ww2 naval planes were quite low

[–]Obrien_r 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That doesn’t help you find the plane in the dark though.

[–]osbstr 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Such a good point. No satellite navigation, night vision/ infrared, autopilot - would have been genuinely terrifying

[–]HercDriver01 194 points195 points  (0 children)

Old saying:

The three best things in life are a good landing, a good orgasm and a good shit.

A night trap is your chance to experience all three.

[–]jondee5179 135 points136 points  (11 children)

Imagine, night time + heavy rains + strong winds + 20ft waves . Thats a big nope.

[–]Jomax101 88 points89 points  (9 children)

Imagine having some headlights on your $100million+ jet

[–]-Forger 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Nah too expensive be realistic bud

[–]cup__ramen 21 points22 points  (6 children)

Most of them do. They turn them off intentionally, so they don't blind the guys in the tower. :)

[–]Hellfire12345677 7 points8 points  (4 children)

Also don’t pilots have NVG in their helmets or am I wrong?

[–]cup__ramen 24 points25 points  (3 children)

NVG, yeah. But the key takeaway here should be that the planes all have advanced computers that help them land and 90% of them landing is watching those instruments. They're probably looking down at the screen more than they'll ever look out the front of their cockpit, even during the day. Not to mention they're constantly getting fed information from the ship that is telling them that they're okay. From like, actual people. It's still an impressive feat to land on a ship in the middle of the night, but not nearly as impressive as people think it might be in this day and age.

[–]fuckingmagnanimous 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Yes and no. Even for a precision approach such as an ILS the minimums are 200’ AGL typically. That means if you can’t see the runway environment at that altitude you must “go missed”. Everything from that altitude down is a visual approach to landing. Also, once you are cleared to land you really don’t talk with air traffic control until touchdown for the most part as it is a critical phase of flight and attention must be directed to flying the plane.

[–]EdwardSnowdensLaptop 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Nope, modern aircraft are designed to take the pilots eyes off of many separate control systems. Modern HUDs are built to display multiple functions. The golden number pilots talk about is 80/20. (80% of their time looking up and out, 20% looking at instruments)

[–]Airbornequalified 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also white lights carry farther at night and help the enemy to locate your position

[–]roararoarus 70 points71 points  (5 children)

Highway to the danger zone

Ride into the danger zone

Headin' into twilight

Spreadin' out her wings tonight

[–]SilverBraids 29 points30 points  (2 children)

Lana? Lana. Laaaaaanaaaaaa!

[–]TheseWereThePlaces 14 points15 points  (1 child)


[–]bricksushi 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Danger zone

[–]n00bMaster27 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Are we still doing phrasing?

[–]spacezombiejesus 41 points42 points  (3 children)

Nah they have FM radio playing non stop hits on their several billion dollar stealth fighter

[–]boarderman8 17 points18 points  (2 children)

No, Danger Zone only plays on Los Santos Rock Radio

[–]3398111 29 points30 points  (10 children)

I'd be pissed with that dim lighting at night

[–]Zachman97 44 points45 points  (6 children)

I’d imagine it’s to train the pilots for war time. You don’t really want a bunch of bright lights showing exactly where your carrier is.

[–]roorva17 13 points14 points  (2 children)

They could be directional so only visible from the angle a pilot can see.

[–]Shadilay_Were_Off 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Also I'd be willing to bet it shows up better in real life (with your eyes adjusted to dark) than on camera.

[–]Exce 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Aircraft carriers aren't exactly the Pinnacle of stealth technology. These ships will be detected by radar faaaaar before being detected visibly. Regardless of the brightness of the lights.

[–]baloneyskims 20 points21 points  (3 children)

$40 million dollar air craft and can't afford a decent pair of night goggles.

[–]Andynisco 8 points9 points  (1 child)

Could also be the Hawkeye, which costs $176 million. Goggles still not included.

It’s very hard to tell because the planes have very similar cockpits

[–]Disownedpenny 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's definitely a Hawkeye. The COD doesn't fly at night.

[–]repeatered 16 points17 points  (1 child)

Stop playing with the damn light switch!

[–]TidyWhip 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Flick flick flick flick flick!

[–]BamBamBrowning 12 points13 points  (1 child)

Imagine having to sneeze right before landing a plane

[–]bigbossmgs3 9 points10 points  (15 children)

Why doesn’t the boat just flick on the footlights to illuminate better?

[–]PercMastaFTW 23 points24 points  (9 children)

The US Navy turns all white lights off at ~sunset to ~sunrise in order to not be seen far away from enemy ships. All hatches and doors to the outside are closed, and all lights inside the vessel are switched from white to red lights.

Flashlights used in the bridge must be red, as well.

[–]Ephemere 6 points7 points  (4 children)

That is kind of surprising, as I would imagine that most threats to a carrier aren’t going to be using visible light to target it.

[–]Airbornequalified 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They wouldn’t. But why make yourself an easier target than need be

[–]PercMastaFTW 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, light can even travel over the horizon, and being able to see your enemy with the naked eye is also very powerful.

In regards to the bridge, you can also consider that keeping the lights down also allows the bridge team to see better at night, which is essential when it’s pitch black.

[–]Disownedpenny 20 points21 points  (0 children)

It's hard to capture on video but you can see the boat pretty easily (assuming good weather). The landing area is lit up, and there's a light on the ship to help you get liked up from several miles away. Cameras always make it look darker than it really is. If there's a full moon, it might as well be daylight. The hardest night traps are when there is no moon, bad weather, or both. The darkness means there is no horizon and the ship just looks like a floating set of lights in a sea of blackness. It's very vertigo inducing.

Source: I fly these.

[–]_Ziklon_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Could be in a war zone so it can’t be seen bye eye? But idk either just a suggestion

[–]aculeus77 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hopefully I remember this correctly from my childhood obsession with Top Gun, but the spotlights on the left act somewhat like lasers, you can only see them when you're on the proper glide path to land. So as long as your plane is going the right speed and you can see the lights you know you're on track to land correctly on the runway. The pilots don't need lights, and being able to see the runway wouldn't help much since it's so small compared to a regular airstrip that trying to land with visual cues only is impossible.

[–]SirOssis 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This is bad ass - thanks for sharing!

[–]soosedup 4 points5 points  (7 children)

How often do pilots fall off the edge of that thing

[–]icandyapple 6 points7 points  (2 children)

I’m not sure how often, but it does happen if the cable catch fails. They have to know to try to take off again if they don’t feel the cable.

My father was an E2 Hawkeye radar plane pilot during Korea and Vietnam. He likens these landings to trying to land on a bobbing postage stamp in the midst of the ocean.

[–]Andynisco 4 points5 points  (1 child)

I think it was probably just Vietnam. The Hawkeye made its first flight in ‘60, after the Korean War

[–]YeBoiHerold 1 point2 points  (2 children)

I believe they go full throttle into the cables (or whatever slows them down). You know, just in case.

[–]Disownedpenny 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The fighters do. The Hawkeye doesn't do that because we have big wings and instantaneous power response. The fighters' engines have to spool up, whereas ours are always at 100%.

[–]chris_bro_pher 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah super awkward when you’re an ignorant passenger lol

[–]o484 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They go full throttle when they touch down so they can go back and try again if they miss the arrestor wire or if the wire breaks

[–]DatBrokeBoi21 4 points5 points  (7 children)

I'm sure pilots flying at night have night vision HUD in their helmets or something similar right? If they just go by the lights that's some big balls

[–]Twisp56 6 points7 points  (4 children)

They definitely don't just eyeball it. Look up Maritime Augmented Guidance with Integrated Controls for Carrier Approach and Recovery Precision Enabling Technologies (MAGIC CARPET)

[–]PercMastaFTW 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's actually relatively new technology.

I'm not a pilot, but before this tech, pilots would control his/her aircraft manually. It's unbelievable what they do.

[–]Disownedpenny 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Hawkeye doesn't have magic carpet. It does make things significantly easier for the jets, but us Hawkeye guys have to do it manually. The daytime pattern is purely visual, but at night you have instruments in the cockpit that guide you down, then it's all visual from about a mile in.

[–]Omni_nerd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love that that's the acronym.

[–]DatBrokeBoi21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ive seen that actually and was curious if this is it as well. It doesn't look like two separate videos, more so a pilot turning his MAGIC CARPET on and off

[–]Turbo_Donut 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Nope. They just looking at the centerline lights and that lens off to the left for glideslope.

[–]goose3000 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Those are some damn good brakes!

[–]chris_bro_pher 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It’s a cable catch

[–]Tunguksa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Carriers have cables in the deck, that aircraft catch with an arrestor hook (often in the back of the plane), and stops them. I should add that they go full throttle once they land in case they don't catch a cable, so that instead of landing in the water, they go around and repeat the landing

[–]volcomdkm 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I used to work on a carrier. Night Ops are no joke

[–]Goodfella66 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Can't they just put more damn lights to help them at night??

[–]jdb326 1 point2 points  (4 children)


[–]dchurch21 0 points1 point  (3 children)


[–]jdb326 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, gotcha.

[–]Andynisco 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Honestly it’s very hard to tell, because the planes have very similar cockpits due to the Greyhound being a derivative of the Hawkeye

[–]Disownedpenny 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah but the C-2 doesn't fly at night.

[–]StylinBrah 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pilots have night vision..

[–]big-ol-donuts 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the landing and stopping quickly in the dark made my stomach drop lol i could never do that

[–]ydgh559 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for making this video, really see ur side of view

[–]knowoneparticular 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Holy shit its dark!

[–]TestedCactus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don't they have night vision to help though?

[–]bernabo25 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Damn the difference is like night and day!

[–]DeadP00L97 0 points1 point  (1 child)

[–]VredditDownloader 2 points3 points  (0 children)


Mention me again if the download link is down

Info | Support me ❤ | Github

[–]Nobodieshero816 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Ok I realize at that speed “headlights” wouldnt serve much purpose ... but also couldnt hurt...?

[–]darcoSM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hats off to all the Pilots who can do this...especially night!

[–]Zubairkbr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I saw this and I was like oh what a cute boat, I though that the camera was mounted on a giant boat, the camera keep approaching and it doesn’t slow down and I’m terrified, then it lands and I’m like ‘?????’ Then I read the title

[–]ChasingFun 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a Gang a math!

[–]HYPR_Maverick 0 points1 point  (2 children)

I still don’t understand carriers and planes like how they slow down so fast

[–]6dogsss 1 point2 points  (1 child)

There are four cables that go horizontal across the runway. The first one is near the back, the fourth is around the middle of the runway. Carrier aircraft have a hook that deploys down from the back. Pilots try to land the jet on the deck with the intention of having the hook snag one of the wires, which slows them down.

[–]HYPR_Maverick 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahhh okay thanks

[–]dakota137 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And that’s in good weather....

[–]CaptainClay5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk this advanced probably have some type of night vision goggles

[–]KConda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why aren’t there more lights??

[–]Native56 0 points1 point  (0 children)


[–]MrAbnormality 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where’s the dudes with the flares

[–]Benignvanilla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Night time....day TIME!!!

[–]One-eyed-snake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got shot off the ass of a carrier on my way home from the navy. I seriously thought I was gonna die. Heavy ass plane dipped down off the carrier before ascending. Good times

[–]SuperWhiteAss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pilots say night with fog is scary as shit

[–]SatanicFolkRemedy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Night vision not included in video...absolutely included on pilot.

[–]massiveboner911 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fun fact: About 2 seconds from touch down the pilot slams the throttle to maximum thrust + full afterburner. Since he flairs, he still touches the runway and the cables. The cables grab the plane and that stops it. However, if the cable breaks and fails the plane is at max power and can take off again.

[–]HighRise85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No music, absolutely beautiful full daytime approach.

no pro

[–]pengeek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A good pilot trusts his instruments

[–]I3uller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At least you’re always landing into the wind

[–]Hlcn8r 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Curious about what their guidance systems computers show at night?

[–]HappycatAF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I couldn’t even do this in Top Gun for the NES.

[–]saz3rac 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do they stop so fast?

[–]RedShadow09 0 points1 point  (0 children)

During the day looks somewhat simple but I would be shitting myself non stop if I had to do that in the dark, you would think they could make the runway a tad brighter. I get that the may have to be invisible from the enemy but still if you are that far out for just the briefest of moments flicker the light on and off

[–]SilKySilK206 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, plus night vision.

[–]Sinistersynz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Shit I'm so add this would never end well