Fossils are Evidence of a World-Wide Flood

Page Contents:

How Fossils are Dated


  • The ages of rocks are used to date fossils
  • The ages of fossils are used to date rocks.





Bones of Contention
Bones of Contention: A Creationist Assessment of Human Fossils
by Marvin L. Lubenow





The Geologic Column


What Do the Fossils Show?




Punctuated Equilibrium – Another theory of evolution


The theory is basically this:

1. Evolution happened.
2. There are no transitional fossils, therefore.



The Cambrian Explosion




Douglas Erwin

James W. Valentine

David Jablonski





What Does This mean to Creation?


Here is an excerpt of that article:






11 responses to “Fossils are Evidence of a World-Wide Flood

  1. Pingback: Charles Darwin described the problems with his theory in his book “Origin of Species” | Reasons Why I Believe in God



  4. Wonderful. Thank you so much for writing this article.

  5. butch cranton

    Good god. There are other ways to date objects which overwhelmingly suggest ancient fossils, e.g. carbon dating. Have you ever heard of statistics? The evidence is in, and your one outlier does nothing to contradict a myriad of evidence in support of evolution.
    Please, don’t do science when you think you already know the answer.

    • humbled

      From your comment it’s obvious your knowledge concerning the many weaknesses and challenges facing scientists and the dating of fossils etc is lacking.(see references)

      I had a good chuckle at your ‘myriad of evidence in support of evolution’ comment, we hear this all too often from Darwinists, haha. What evidence would that be butch? Vestigial organs, junk DNA or a favourite of mine, transitional fossils? Or perhaps the mighty tree of life?

      Also, wikipedia is hardly a reputable source. Hell my lecturers won’t even allow us to reference it (too many errors and bias).

      Your closing remark is uncalled for. You attempt to take the high ground, but your explanation does not elevate you so.


  6. Matt

    You say Stephen Gould “believed in evolution but did not believe that the fossil evidence supported that belief.”

    Now lets see what he really thought. From

    I guess this quote shows that very much yes he did believe that the evidence did support Evolution.

  7. Matt

    Surely you would agree with Stephen Gould that it doesn’t matter if “Transitional forms are generally lacking at the species level” beacuse as you have clearly stated “Each basic kind of animal has the capacity for adapting to any ecological zone they come across.” which shows that for you a Kind has a taxonomic rank of an Order. Well below the need taxonomic rank of species.

  8. Matt

    Do you the really big problem that you have with disputing the fossil record and saying that Noah’s flood is the only cause is that you then have to explain how there can be fossils in the Grand Canyon and yet still have the Grand Canyon form. That makes no sense.

    Now about the Grand Canyon. It isn’t straight. In fact it winds it’s way through Colorado Plateau in the same way that any river does. If, as according to answersingenesis, it was created in a few days then it should have caved a straight trench. Can you please explain.

  9. Matt

    You say “The earth is only thousands of years old and not millions of years old” so far you have not proved that this is true or explain away flaws in your own logic. Like how the food is the cause of fossils. The flood is also created the canyons. The Grand Canyon has fossils. So somehow the fossils were laid down in layer in the Grand Canyon and yet was somehow carved out of this layered rock at the same time!!!!! This makes no sense.

Leave a Reply


You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo


Twitter picture


Facebook photo


Connecting to %s