Tag Archives: we can achieve their representations by the following equation: Att=X<mi 1415565-02-4

We propose a new method for tumor classification from gene expression

We propose a new method for tumor classification from gene expression data, which mainly contains three steps. literature ( matrix denote the gene expression data (generally n<Rabbit Polyclonal to TRIM24 the matrix of the scalar product of the consensus eigenassays be the 1415565-02-4 realization of the random vector ?1, +1. Assume that : ? (? ? to a feature space of labeled data points: = {(has the same dimensionality as is a real number, and is called the margin. The quantity corresponds to the distance between 1415565-02-4 the point and the decision boundary. When multiplied by the label to be classified, a label is assigned according to its relationship to the decision boundary, and the corresponding decision function is: such that




(9) Hence, the rows of Atn contain the coefficients (representations) of the linear combination of statistically independent sources (rows of S) that comprise Xtn. For the test set Xtt, we can achieve their representations by the following equation:

Att=X1415565-02-4 mathvariant=”normal”>ttS?1

(10) After the representations of the training and test data have been achieved, we then used SFFS and SVM to select independent features for experiment. The numbers of the selected features were determined by using LOOCV in the training dataset. What should be denoted is that the eigengenes (columns of A) and the eigenassays (rows of S) were not simply calculated by FastICA. In experiments, they were calculated by using ICA and consensus sources algorithm. In this study, we used the SVM with RBF kernel as the classifier. Since building a prediction model requires good generalization towards making predictions for previously unseen test samples, tuning the parameters is an important issue, which requires optimization of the regularization parameter as well as the kernel parameter of SVM. This was done by searching a two-dimensional grid of different values for both parameters. Moreover, the small sample size characterizing microarray data restricts the choice of an estimator for the generalization performance. To solve these problems, the optimization criterion also used the LOOCV performance described above. The value of the regularization parameter corresponding to the largest LOOCV performance was then selected as the optimal value. To obtain reliable experimental results showing comparability and repeatability for different numerical experiments, we not only used the original division of each dataset in training and test set, but also reshuffled all datasets randomly. In other words, all numerical experiments were performed with 20 random splits of the three original datasets. In addition, they are also stratified,.