











Source: The Wall Street Journal

Comments     Threshold


RE: Pathetic
By fearrun on 12/12/2012 8:16:50 PM , Rating: 0
How can you be Pro Child, Pro Family and Pro Choice all at the same time?

The lives of so many children have been ended due to "Poor Choice". Sex is not a necessity of living, it is a necessity to create life. Abstinence is an easy choice and the best method to avoid consensual sex.

In a dire case of life&death, a doctors medical decision of triage or perhaps something similar to a living will should be followed.

A female victim of rape should be given every measure of support possible to help her confront the attacker and carry a pregnancy to term. All other options should be given a chance before resorting to ending a life.

If a woman exercises her "Pro Choice" for a reason less than death or severe trauma (of her and/or the child), I would consider it an abhorrent selfish act completely void of any care except for them self. It is tantamount to considering the life of another being an inconvenience to your own, due to a decision you made and then choosing stop that inconvenience by intentionally ending the others life.

The act of sex should not be engaged in frivolously (pleasure is not a serious reason for sex). Those who "Choose" to have sex, should be prepared to accept full responsibility for all possible outcomes.

This world is full of selfish behavior, with people unwilling to accept personal responsibility. They look for the easiest way to satisfy their immediate desires. "Poor Choice", it is so unfortunate that so many are being indoctrinated into this life path.

(Oh, on topic, yes Apple is a "Poor Choice".)

