Hi, I'm Greg! http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/ Hi, I'm Greg! - LiveJournal.com Wed, 05 Jun 2013 11:07:35 GMT LiveJournal / LiveJournal.com gregmathews 24696189 personal http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/97088455/24696189 Hi, I'm Greg! http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/ 84 100 http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/249914.html Wed, 05 Jun 2013 11:07:35 GMT American hitchhiker gang raped in India http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/249914.html <p><a href="http://area148.com/cms/american-hitchhiker-gang-raped-in-india/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Area 14/8</a></p> <p><img src="file:///D|/ZoundryRaven/resourcestore/zrclip_001n5ebeae6f.png" style="WIDTH: 226px; HEIGHT: 129px" height="480" width="800" /></p> <p>NEW DELHI:An American woman was gang-raped in the northern Indian resort town of Manali,police said.</p> <p>Three men in a truck picked up the 30-year-old woman as she was hitchhiking to her guest house after visiting a friend,police officer Sher Singh said.</p> <p>The men drove to a secluded spot and raped her,he said. She went to police and they filed a rape case.</p> <p>Authorities issued an alert for the three men and set up roadblocks to check any trucks leaving the town,he said. No arrests had been made as of Tuesday afternoon,Singh said.</p> <p>The rape came after a Swiss tourist was gang-raped in March while on a cycling trip through rural India. Six men were arrested in that attack.</p> <p>The same month,a British woman traveling elsewhere in northern India jumped from a third-floor window fearing a sexual attack after the hotel's owner tried to force his way into her room.</p> <p>Concern about sexual assaults in India has heightened since the fatal gang-rape of a woman in New Delhi in December sparked public protests demanding better protection for women.</p> <p>In response,the government passed a law increasing prison terms for rape and providing for the death penalty in cases of rape that result in death or leave the victim in a coma.</p> <p>It also made voyeurism,stalking,acid attacks and the trafficking of women punishable under criminal law.</p> http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/249914.html public 0 http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/249742.html Fri, 03 May 2013 07:59:21 GMT Sino-Japan: shelving the dispute? http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/249742.html <p><a href="http://tacstrat.com/content/index.php/2013/05/02/sino-japan-shelving-the-dispute/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><strong>TACSTRAT ANALYSIS</strong></a></p> <p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"><img src="file:///D|/ZoundryRaven/resourcestore/zrclip_004n5249f0fd.png" style="WIDTH: 323px; HEIGHT: 162px" height="271" width="434" /></p> <p>While China and Japan have shared a heavy history of hostility and slow progression towards mutually beneficial ventures, both the countries seem to have focused more on token gestures than concrete measures to secure healthy bilateral economic relations. By virtue of being flourishing economies, and having regional interests coinciding, it was only rational for the China and Japan to address their problems, to fix their attitudes towards each other. The zenith of Sino-Japan departure lies around the East China Sea controversy. Both states claim right to ownership of the islands on this sea. The Diaoyu/ Senkaku Islands have brought China and Japan into a bitter dispute over decades.</p> <p>The Diaoyu in Chinese and Senkaku in Japanese are a tiny group islands 6.3 km² in total, consisting of eight insular formations, of which the largest is 4.3 km². None of these are inhabited without any trace of human or economic activity, and five are completely barren. Yet, despite the insignificant area, and economic worth, these islands have brought Sino-Japan ties to turbulent points, owing to strategic geographical location. Midway Taiwan and Japan, these islands are key to both China's and Japan's national defense. If either one secures sovereignty, the owner will enjoy military security advantage with prolonged and enlarged frontier.</p> <p>Hence, given the crucial nature of the land, would either one wish to resolve this issue? We know the steps towards reconciliation. A basic understanding of international law, United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which came into effect in 1994, and some historical knowledge can allow resolve the conflict. Key questions need to be addressed. In 1895 when Japan claimed sovereignty were the Senkaku islands terra nullius? After Japan's epic defeat in WWII were they returned to China? How should China's and Japan's boundaries of the East China Sea be demarcated under international law? But will either state want to cooperate with an external entity if losing out becomes a possibility?</p> <p>Economically speaking, a continental shelf, or exclusive economic zone (EEZ), of 40,000 km² is attached to these islets. The claimant will have rights over all natural resources in this vicinity, and what is more tempting than the possibility of oil and gas reserves in the region? United Nations Economic Commission for Asia in a report released in 1968 suggested the possibility of large oil reserves in the Diaoyu/Senkaku waters. Given China's and Japan's insatiable thirst for energy and resources, the islands have become the source of possible military conflict. The potential defense and economic gains from their ownership have surfaced the ugly reality behind staged diplomacy.</p> <p>Moreover, domestic and international politics for both will be impacted by the outcome, as both governments are involved in other island disputes. A loss here will damage credibility and may act as a negative domino effect on all other fronts.</p> <p>Annexed in 1895 by Japan, till the 1960s and early '70s when the promising prediction of hydrocarbon deposits was released, Japan and the US signed the Ryuku Reversion Agreement in 1971 to officially bestow ownership to Japan. This backdoor diplomacy was not welcome by China and Taiwan. While the US warned against any exploitation of resources, both countries decided to visit the island prop up their flags shortly after. Despite China labeling the territory sacred, Nixon in 1972 decided to 'return' South-Western Islands to Japan. US' pro-Japan stance over the years has seen a neutral shift with their need to improve relations with China as a growing economy. A 'hand-off' policy introduced by America has kept the conflict from escalating, but has also promoted no resolution, but a mutual decision to shelve it for the future, unsuccessfully so.</p> <p>A Japanese lighthouse, Chinese activists landing, renovating the lighthouse, Taiwanese boats to block renovation attempts; the islands seem to have attracted an entertaining saga of events from all three stakeholders. Japan's decision to arrest the Chinese protestors from the no-man's land generated criticism and concern from Beijing. Japan's right wing group, responsible for the lighthouse (1978) rammed a bus into the Chinese consulate to protest their China's claims.</p> <p>Japan continues to protect the lighthouse in 2004 that has caused much unnecessary stir, as a remnant of their right to the islands. Tokyo's move, according to Chinese Foreign Minister was "a serious provocation and violation of Chinese territorial sovereignty. To make matters worse Japan started exploring for natural gas in its self alleged EEZ, an area east of the median line between the two countries that China disputes Japan's right to. But in 2005 Japan Petroleum Exploration Co. and Teikoku Oil Co began talks with the Japanese government to drill areas falling under disputed territories.</p> <p>Japan and China with the island dispute have justified their respective claims to justify their own standpoints. For Japan, the sovereignty claim is premised on international law's clause that terra nullis becomes a specific state's territory. This is an established principal in international law, but the question is whether or not the islands were terra nullius in 1895. This claim has been contested by China, and no evidence so far has overridden Beijing's concern. According to China certain surveys were carried out by them in the territory in 1885, proving that they were not unclaimed, but were discovered and incorporated in 1895.</p> <p>While Japan argues that the dispute came to the front burner just because of the discovery of potential energy resources in the seabed around the islands, China emphasizes that the issue came to the front burner because of the U.S.-Japan Joint Statement and the Ryukyu Reversion Agreement, which illegally include China's Diaoyu Islands in the territory to be returned to Japanese sovereignty. And Japan continuously refers to its reversion agreement with the United States to validate its sovereignty. So far the islands have been placed under the supervision of the United States, in accordance with the San Francisco Peace Treaty, giving some administrative rights to Japan under the 1971 agreement. China challenges the legitimacy of the San Francisco Treaty because neither China nor Taiwan were not signatories.</p> <p>The multifaceted nature of the Diaoyu/Senkaku island dispute has complicated relations between all three states. The problems are not only defense or economy related, but the fragile mesh both states are entangled in with respect to domestic political landscape, and other island disputes. For Japan's aggressive right giving the Senkaku up is not an option. And Chinese feel strongly about the territory in question, as it is 'sacred'. Perhaps the initial motive by the governments to politicize the matter was to have a stronger case. But this can also backfire, as failure to secure the EEZ now will result in a negative domino effect, as the government who failed its people. The matter is politicized to the point that it has become personal.</p> <p>Both governments have been at pains to downplay the issue, as neither can afford confrontation, but domestic and international political factors are beyond their immediate control. Extremists in both Japan and China are hurting the delicate diplomatic tango both countries had orchestrated successfully over the decades. While military conflict seems unlikely, despite the recent escalation of news suggesting a showdown, it is also equally unlikely for any form of resolution to be reached. For both states shelving the problem keeps their boat afloat and hence both are delaying the possibility of facing this issue. While political deadlock is difficult to break, two disputants could jointly exploit the economic resources following a model of cooperation that already exists in East Asia in the Republic of Korea-Japan Joint Development Area, for example.</p> http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/249742.html china public 0 http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/249406.html Fri, 03 May 2013 07:50:08 GMT FP Analysis: The Population Bomb http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/249406.html <p><em>By Enum Naseer</em> <br /> <a href="http://forpakistan.org/fpdata/the-population-bomb/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">FOR PAKISTAN</a></p> <p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"><img src="file:///D|/ZoundryRaven/resourcestore/zrclip_001p68a786.png" height="274" width="184" /></p> <p>It is simple economics: resources are scarce and wants are unlimited. The problem of allocation gets more serious when population growth is unchecked- as is the case in Pakistan. It is confusing hence, that no one has taken the pains to voice the issue in the mainstream media; no political party mentioned it in its rallies; no slogans or chants went further than the usual clichés. While the future leaders and the public busy themselves with the task of wooing and being wooed, the population bomb ticks away. The promises and plans, albeit optimistic and hopeful, evade the population issue almost strategically. It is as if the fact that the unrestrained population growth will have an undesirable impact on the distribution of resources like food has gone unnoticed. Or more so perhaps, the problem has been brushed under the carpet for fear that it may give rise to an uncomfortable debate?</p> <p><strong><a href="http://forpakistan.org/fpdata/the-population-bomb/" rel="nofollow">Read more....</a></strong></p> http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/249406.html pakistan public 0 http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/249304.html Tue, 30 Apr 2013 09:19:31 GMT Kashmir and the Afghan withdrawal http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/249304.html <p><em>By Abdul Majid Zargar <br /></em><a href="http://tacstrat.com/content/index.php/2013/04/30/the-impact-of-americas-afghanistan-withdrawal-on-kashmir/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">TACSTRAT</a></p> <p>In-spite of a massive force build-up and despite adoption of " Shock &amp; awe" theory and thousands of Drone attacks backed up by latest technology, a defeat stares in the face of America in Afghanistan. Its troop withdrawal plan by the end of 2014 is an organized retreat, if not a total surrender.</p> <p>And this defeat has not made appearance out of thin air. Washington has known for years that it had no hope of destroying the Taliban, and that it would have to settle for compromise and a political solution with an indigenous insurgency that remains sufficiently popular to have survived the longest U.S. military occupation in history. It was also predicted by think tanks &amp; defense experts alike long ago. A 2010 Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), report on Afghanistan predicted:"We have not yet achieved any meaningful form of positive strategic result from over nine years of war in Afghanistan and the conflict may end in a major grand strategic defeat." Before dying, Richard Holbrooke admitted it, saying "You've got to stop this war in Afghanistan." His signal was clear &amp; unambiguous .It is another thing that Washington Post reinterpreted it, saying:"Holbrooke's death is the latest complication in an effort plagued by unreliable partners, reluctant allies and an increasingly skeptical American public."In 2012, a New York Times editorial wrote that the U.S. military has had to give up on hopes of inflicting enough pain on the Taliban to set favorable terms for a political settlement. Instead, it will be left up to the Afghan combatants to find their own political solution once the U.S. and its allies take themselves out of the fight.</p> <p>War has its own vocabulary &amp; dictionary. While its start heralds a destruction, its ends sprouts a hope. Hope not only for people who have been direct victims of war but also for region as a whole. It also emits signals which are taken as precedents for adoption by parties- to- conflict in a near or distant land. And America's imminent defeat in Afghanistan is already emitting powerful signals that only a Gun can be answer to enforce a decision or solution, how-so-ever powerful the other party might be. It has rekindled a new hope among those propagating armed struggle in Kashmir as the only viable way to solve the long festering problem of Kashmir.</p> <p>Kashmir is a geopolitical Gordian knot, interwoven by Indian and Pakistani intransigence .The real reason for the Indian State's obsession with Kashmir is that 'losing Kashmir' (whatever that means) will make the Indian state look 'weak'. For Pakistan the misconception is that Kashmir is its jugular vein ( again whatever that means). Both these narratives are devoid of genuine aspirations of people of J&amp;K. Even after acquiring huge stockpile of nuclear arms both countries are distrustful &amp; fearful of each other.</p> <p>Kashmir is the longest standing dispute recognized by United Nations &amp; International community. It is the highest militarized zone on earth and according to a fresh entry in the Guinness book of world records, nearly a million of soldiers are continuously staring at each other in a territory which is flanked by three nuclear armed countries. And supposedly the professional armies of both the countries have ceded space to communal &amp; extremist elements within their ranks.</p> <p>It is a drain on the hopes for prosperity, peace and freedom for people throughout the subcontinent, and the world. There is no moving toward peaceful coexistence between the two countries, no stabilization of the region, no possibility for global nuclear disarmament. This conflict has made a vast majority of population hostages in their own land and a tiny minority refugees in their own State. This conflict of last sixty years has brought so much of death &amp; destruction to countless families that another sixty six years will be insufficient to heal their wounds. One fails to understand What exactly is their fault? Is it that they were born on the wrong side of the globe?</p> <p>Let India &amp; Pakistan start negotiations not out of fear but let they also not fear to negotiate. And before the signals emanating out of Afghanistan are translated into action by extreme elements, which only means further death &amp; destruction, let those be pre-empted by both Countries finding a lasting solution to the problem by taking genuine representatives of Jammu &amp;Kashmir on board and sooner this happens, the better it is.</p> <p>Author is a practicing chartered Accountant. Email: <a href="mailto:abdulmajidzargar@gmail.com" rel="nofollow">abdulmajidzargar@gmail.com</a></p> http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/249304.html nato us troops afghanistan america taliban public 0 http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/248918.html Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:27:40 GMT Lip Service to Goodwill http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/248918.html <p><a href="http://forpakistan.org/fpdata/lip-service-to-goodwill/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">FOR PAKISTAN</a></p> <p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"><img src="file:///D|/ZoundryRaven/resourcestore/zrclip_002n73ce1b42.png" height="194" width="259" /></p> <p>Over the past few months an ongoing debate about opening the borders to our next door neighbor has engulfed drawing room discussions, economics and politics lectures, the industrialist, the Mazdoor (wage laborer), and of course the talk shows. Those in favor of this upgrade in India's status have brought to notice a need for better ties. It is now more obvious than ever that on all fronts, economic, social, political and security; India has left Pakistan far behind. While India has been labeled the World's largest and most multicultural democracy, proud liberals quote Mother India as the torch bearer, pride of the democratic legacy, a success story; Pakistan is equally known for the opposite reasons: Terrorism, conflict, unstable governance, and sectarian and religious strife.</p> <p><a href="http://forpakistan.org/fpdata/lip-service-to-goodwill/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><strong>Read more...</strong></a></p> http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/248918.html terrorism pakistan army cia public 0 http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/248815.html Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:32:09 GMT Spearhead Analysis: Elections held hostage http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/248815.html <p><em>By Nida Afaque <br /></em> <strong><a href="http://spearheadresearch.org/SR_CMS/index.php/researchopinions/elections-held-hostage" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">SPEARHEAD RESEARCH</a></strong></p> <p><img src="file:///D|/ZoundryRaven/resourcestore/zrclip_002p7dc78a7b.png" height="175" width="300" /></p> <p>As elections draw near, the political climate within Pakistan has turned sober. Contesting parties are working industriously to widen their voter base, the Election Commission is overworked with verifying candidates' credibility and the interim government is struggling to contain the country's affairs until the next government is ready to take charge. But there is another kind of force, one that is becoming more elusive than ever, which is busy opposing efforts to a peaceful democratic transition.</p> <p>These anti-state forces have been involved in harmful activities for quite long. Pakistan has had to pay the price of these terrorist elements through money, blood and an overall loss of security. Since the beginning of this year, the weekly death toll averages 175, with most violence concentrated in Karachi, Baluchistan, KPK and FATA. Various religious extremists like Jundullah, Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (LeJ) and most commonly, Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) have been found responsible for the attacks on senior politicians and government and security buildings across the country. Other civil separatist movements like the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) have targeted government officials and security personnel.</p> <p><a href="http://spearheadresearch.org/SR_CMS/index.php/researchopinions/elections-held-hostage" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><strong>Read more...</strong></a></p> http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/248815.html tehrik-e-taliban pakistan ttp pakistani taliban fata baluchistan pml-n public 0 http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/248327.html Wed, 10 Apr 2013 05:54:36 GMT Extreme Human Rights Abuses by Indian Army http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/248327.html <p>By <a href="http://soskashmir.wordpress.com/2013/01/10/extreme-human-rights-abuses-by-indian-army/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">S.O.S Kashmir</a> </p> <p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"> <img src="file:///D|/ZoundryRaven/resourcestore/zrclip_002p22842e86.png" style="WIDTH: 328px; HEIGHT: 226px" height="422" width="576" /> </p> <p>The rape in Delhi has shocked India. Has it really? Or was it the sight of thousands of young students, male and female, demonstrating on the streets and being assaulted by the police for daring to demonstrate that made some Indian citizens think seriously about the problem? As for the Congress government that has, like most of the opposition parties, tolerated this for decades, it was the bad publicity abroad that finally did the trick, but only as far as this case is concerned.</p> <p>Rape takes place in police stations, in military barracks, in the streets and occasionally in some provincial parliaments. The feminist Communist parliamentarian Brinda Karat, who has long campaigned on the issue, pointed to the assault of a member of the Trinamool assembly by a male oppositionist on 11 December last year. 'Women were not safe even inside the assembly,' she said.</p> <p>Legal activists in Kashmir and Manipur, occupied by the Indian Army, have produced report after report highlighting cases of women raped by soldiers. Response from the top brass: nil. In a country where the culture of rape is so embedded, only a determined effort on every level can change things. This will not happen if this case and others are forgotten.</p> <p>In 2004, a group of middle-aged mothers were so enraged by the military raping their daughters and sisters that they organised a protest unique in the annals of the women's movement. They gathered outside the Indian Army barracks, stripped, and held up a banner that read 'Indian Army Rape Us.' That image, too, shocked India, but nothing changed. Only a few weeks later another rape scandal erupted in Manipur. If the Indian state is incapable of defending its women, perhaps the world's largest democracy should seriously consider a change of name. Rapeistan comes to mind.</p> <h2>Manipur District Map</h2> <p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"> <img src="file:///D|/ZoundryRaven/resourcestore/zrclip_008p2d236bec.png" style="WIDTH: 382px; HEIGHT: 376px" height="744" width="576" /> </p> <p> <strong>I. Summary</strong> </p> <blockquote> <p> <em>It takes us a long time to raise our children. Then, when they grow up, they are shot. This cannot go on. We no longer want to look for our children in the morgue.</em> </p> <p> <em>-Yumlembam Mema, women's rights activist in Manipur</em> </p> </blockquote> <p>A woman is arrested at her home at night. The authorities provide her family a signed document acknowledging her arrest. The next morning, villagers find her bullet-ridden corpse some four kilometers away from her home. There are widespread protests following the woman's death. Promises are made by the highest authorities of the country, and yet, after four years, justice remains undone. No one is punished for this crime.</p> <p>This is the story of Thangjam Manorama Devi, a 32-year-old resident of India's Manipur state. The paramilitary Assam Rifles suspected her of links to an underground separatist group and detained her on July 11, 2004. The soldiers raided her home in Bamon Kampu village a little after midnight, asking the family to wait outside while they questioned her. They then signed an "arrest memo," an official acknowledgement of detention put in place to prevent "disappearances" and took her away. Her body was found outside a nearby village. She had been shot through the lower half of her body, raising suspicion that bullets had been used to hide evidence of rape.</p> <p>Human rights violations by security forces engaged in counter-insurgency operations in Manipur state have occurred with depressing regularity over the last five decades. Separatist militants have also committed widespread human rights abuses. According to the police, nearly 3,000 civilians have died in the conflict since 1990. At least 1,300 militants and nearly 1,000 members of the security forces have also been killed. According to unofficial sources, at least 20,000 people may have died due to violence since the conflict began in the 1950s. But Manipur, a small state of two million people, is tucked away in the country's remote northeastern region. Not much that happens there makes the national news-unless it is a particularly brutal attack by militants.</p> <p>However, the security forces' clear role in Manaroma's killing captured widespread media attention. Protests erupted in Manipur, while domestic and international human rights groups demanded an immediate investigation and the prosecution of those responsible. Concerned that the government would fail to hold soldiers accountable for the killing, as had repeatedly been the case in the past, for several weeks Manipuris took to the streets. Students, lawyers, traders, mothers, journalists, and human rights activists marched every day, demanding justice. One man committed self-immolation in protest, several others attempted suicide.</p> <p>The paramilitary Assam Rifles claimed that Manorama was shot dead while trying to escape. In later affidavits, the soldiers implicated said that she was helping the army locate another militant when she instead tried to escape. It is a difficult account to accept: an unarmed, handcuffed woman, wearing the tightly-bound Manipuri sarong that does not lend itself to big strides, supposedly managed to escape the custody of an armed escort. And if she did, it does not explain why the soldiers were unable to catch her and had to shoot to kill. There has also been no explanation why Manorama had not been handed over to police custody by the arresting officials of the Assam Rifles, as the law requires. Or why no female official had been brought in at the time of this night arrest, as is the rule.</p> <p>Soldiers were able to arrest Manorama because they are empowered to do so under India's Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA), the 1958 emergency law under which the armed forces are deployed in internal conflicts and enjoy broad powers to arrest, search, and shoot to kill. This 50-year-old law also provides security forces immunity from prosecution and has thus protected members of the Assam Rifles-as well as soldiers in Jammu and Kashmir, and other states in India's northeast-responsible for killings such as Manorama's from being brought before a civilian judge to be prosecuted for murder and other offenses.</p> <p>Manipuris have long campaigned for the repeal of the AFSPA. Demanding that the act be scrapped, human rights activist Irom Chanu Sharmila has been on hunger strike for nearly eight years. Her protest began after Assam Rifles gunned down ten civilians on November 2, 2000. She remains in judicially ordered custody, force-fed through a nasal tube.</p> <p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"> <img src="file:///D|/ZoundryRaven/resourcestore/zrclip_001n12cd6230.png" style="WIDTH: 324px; HEIGHT: 224px" height="397" width="576" /> <br /> <em>Sharmila has been on hunger strike to demand a repeal of the AFSPA since November 2000. © 2007 AFP/Getty Images</em> </p> <p>After Manorama's killing, 32 organizations formed a network called Apunba Lup in a campaign to repeal the AFSPA. The most heart-wrenching protest was by a group of Manipuri women, members of the Meira Paibi ("torch bearers"), who on July 15, 2004 stripped naked in front of the Assam Rifles camp in the state capital, Imphal, wrapped in a banner that said, "Indian Army Rape Us."</p> <p>Forced to respond, the state government of Manipur ordered a judicial enquiry by retired district judge C. Upendra Singh. Judge Upendra Singh submitted his report in November 2004. Almost four years later, the report is yet to be made public. As court proceedings continue, no action has been taken.</p> <p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"> <img src="file:///D|/ZoundryRaven/resourcestore/zrclip_002p22842e86.png" style="WIDTH: 328px; HEIGHT: 226px" height="422" width="576" /> <br /> <em>Women protest the killing and alleged rape of Thangjam Manorama Devi with a banner reading "Indian Army Rape Us" at the army headquarters in Imphal in July 2004. © 2004 AFP/Getty Images</em> </p> <p>Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh meanwhile promised justice in the Manorama case and a review of the AFSPA. In November 2004, he set up a committee headed by B.P. Jeevan Reddy, a retired judge of the Supreme Court. The report was submitted in June 2005. While the Jeevan Reddy committee report has also not been made public, the contents were leaked, and it is now known that the committee recommended repeal of the AFSPA. The report however remains with the cabinet in New Delhi for consideration, and no action has been taken.</p> <p>In the Manorama case, Assam Rifles said that it ordered an internal inquiry. The army and paramilitaries never reveal the findings of internal inquiries, and thus it remains unknown if any member of the Assam Rifles was found responsible for Manorama's killing and whether they were appropriately punished. Making a concession to public outrage, the defense ministry did release a statement on July 28, 2004 saying only that the court of inquiry had found some "lapses" by Assam Rifles personnel. In an interview with Human Rights Watch, a spokesman for the Assam Rifles said he could not say what action was taken by the court of inquiry "because the concerned officials from that time are no longer in Manipur and the records are not available."</p> <p>Meanwhile, Manorama's family is still waiting for justice to be done. It may be a long wait. Political leaders and government officials may privately agree that Manorama's killing was unlawful, but the Indian state has failed, yet again, to hold soldiers responsible for a serious human rights violation accountable.</p> <p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"> <img src="file:///D|/ZoundryRaven/resourcestore/zrclip_003p5d9889cf.png" style="WIDTH: 290px; HEIGHT: 204px" height="363" width="576" /> <br /> <em>Shrine in memory of Thangjam Manorama Devi outside her house. © 2008 Human Rights Watch</em> </p> <p> <strong>Continuing Security Force Abuses</strong> </p> <p>After Manorama's death, the security forces appeared to curtail their human rights violations. This did not last long. Since 2006, extrajudicial killings, torture, and other abuses have once again become common practice. According to Human Rights Alert, an Imphal-based voluntary group, in 2006 there were 17 cases in which security forces allegedly extrajudicially executed civilians; in 2007, 12 cases were documented by the group; and as of July 2008, at least 23 such cases had been listed.</p> <p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"> <img src="file:///D|/ZoundryRaven/resourcestore/zrclip_004n1c268b9.png" style="WIDTH: 146px; HEIGHT: 221px" height="460" width="232" /> </p> <p>For this report, Human Rights Watch investigated several cases of alleged extrajudicial killings committed by the security forces since 2006. In one case, Mohammad Ayub Khan and six others, traveling in a van, were stopped during a routine check by the 19th Assam Rifles on August 26, 2007 at Gwaltabi in Ukhrul district. The soldiers found that Ayub Khan, a mason, was carrying a large sum of money. He explained that this was cash to pay his workers. The soldiers insisted that the van, with all its passengers, be driven to the Assam Rifles camp at Litan. At the camp, Ayub Khan was separated from his co-passengers, who were released. When Ayub Khan's family heard of the detention, they went to the camp but were not allowed to enter. His brother filed a missing person complaint at the Litan police station, saying that Ayub Khan was last seen in the custody of the 19th Assam Rifles.</p> <p>On August 30, 2007, the Litan police contacted the family. They said that the Assam Rifles had informed the police that a person had been killed in an armed encounter. They suggested that the family check to see if the unidentified person was their missing relative. The family identified the person as Ayub Khan. The Assam Rifles issued a statement claiming that a suspected militant had been shot in an armed exchange and weapons had been recovered from him. Ayub Khan's father, Mohammad Karimuddin, told Human Rights Watch that the Assam Rifles are lying:</p> <p>How can there be an armed encounter with someone who is already in custody? There are witnesses who saw my son being detained. If they [Assam Rifles] thought my son was a militant, they could have arrested him. But they only wanted his money and did not want the truth to come out. So they killed him. They know that no one questions the army in Manipur.</p> <p> <strong>Police Abuses</strong> </p> <p>The behavior of the army appears to have encouraged the Manipur state police to act similarly. The culture of violence has become so deep-rooted that the police have in recent years committed the same abuses as the army and paramilitary forces. In several of the recent cases documented by Human Rights Watch, the alleged perpetrators belonged to the Manipur police. The Manipur state police chief, Yumnam Joykumar Singh, told Human Rights Watch: "My people have been told not to commit human rights abuses and none has occurred." However, in the same conversation claiming that many of the militants were not political fighters but petty extortionists, he also said, "I have told my people. These fellows must be eliminated. Nothing else can cure us of this disease."</p> <p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"> <img src="file:///D|/ZoundryRaven/resourcestore/zrclip_006n7917dc.png" style="WIDTH: 140px; HEIGHT: 188px" height="424" width="280" /> </p> <p>The message to eliminate militants seems to have resonated with the police. Human Rights Watch was repeatedly told that police commandos were among the worst human rights violators in Manipur. Leitanthem Premananda was picked up on January 30, 2006 and, according to relatives, executed later that same day. Together with their neighbors and friends, the relatives formed an action committee to protest the killing; the police threatened retribution. On February 10, 2006, two leaders of the protest committee, Pechimayum Yaima Singh and Leikapokpam Bisashini, were arrested by the Manipur police. Pechimayum Yaima Singh remained in custody for two months. "My family was very worried," he said. "Finally, we were released. But we had to promise that we stop the protests, and were threatened that we would be arrested again if we followed up on this case."</p> <p>Abujam Shidam, a well-known member of the opposition Manipur People's Party, was arrested on January 7, 2008. While in custody, he says he was tortured by police commandos claiming to be members of a joint interrogation cell.</p> <p>I was blindfolded. They started beating and kicking me, saying that I must admit I was a member of the PLA [militant group called People's Liberation Army]. They filled buckets of water and poured it on my face. They pressed on my joints with their boots. I kept shouting that I was not a militant, but they would not stop.</p> <p>While the legal impunity under the AFSPA does not formally extend to the state police, police commandos now routinely get away with serious crimes including torture, and fake "encounter killings." As one activist described it to Human Rights Watch, "The long-term pernicious influence of the AFSPA on Manipur society is its trickle-down effect. One can argue that the rampant corruption in civil administration is a fallout of the climate of impunity generated for many decades by AFSPA in Manipur."</p> <p> <strong>Armed Groups</strong> </p> <p>Indian officials and many Manipuris point out that the armed groups, commonly called "UGs" (short for "underground"), also commit serious human rights abuses. Some of these groups have a tremendous hold over Manipuri society, with ordinary citizens forced to build alliances with one group to ensure protection from the rest. Many impose a variety of diktats, including a ban on some television channels, on women wearing western clothes, the use of drugs, tobacco, or alcohol and implement such orders with force. Some groups have been responsible for attacks on ethnic minorities. For example, in March 2008, militants killed 14 migrant laborers from other Indian states and left behind a note warning others to leave Manipur. In January 2006, armed cadres belonging to United National Liberation Front (UNLF) and Kangleipak Community Party (KCP) allegedly raped 21 Hmar tribal girls in Manipur's Churachandpur district. Militants have also been responsible for the indiscriminate use of landmines, bombs, political killings, and attacks upon those they consider to be informers or traitors.</p> <p>Manipuris complain most about militant groups' culture of extortion. The state is unable to provide protection from these extortion demands-in fact, many government officials pay themselves. Recently, there has been a spate of abductions by militant groups to recruit children into armed groups involved in fighting. At least 24 school children were reported missing in June and July 2008, leading to widespread protests. One faction of the militant group People's Revolutionary Party of Kangleipak (PREPAK) admitted that that they had recruited some of the missing children.</p> <p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"> <img src="file:///D|/ZoundryRaven/resourcestore/zrclip_007p7eb6d7b4.png" style="WIDTH: 342px; HEIGHT: 188px" height="337" width="576" /> <br /> <em>Protest against attack by militants in Imphal, the capital of Manipur. © 2008 Human Rights Watch</em> </p> <p> <strong>Impunity</strong> </p> <p>Manipuri activists do not dispute the need for strong law enforcement to end the violence perpetrated by militants. Some want the army to remain deployed to combat the UGs, while others want the army withdrawn. But all want the AFSPA to be repealed because of the open license it provides for abuses.</p> <p>More fundamentally, Manipuris want the culture of impunity to end. Not only has the failure to punish Manorama's killers shattered any existing faith in the justice system, many Manipuris feel it has also emboldened security officials to take the law into their own hands and to believe they can get away with murder. As one government official admitted to Human Rights Watch, "Known criminals are sometimes killed, but it never happens to innocents." In this way the security forces have become judge, jury, and executioner-and have become comfortable in adopting this role.</p> <p>The more or less free rein given to government forces for decades in Manipur and other parts of the northeast has had a significant impact on the country generally. Similar polcies have since been adopted to stamp out armed separatist movements in various other parts of India. Some argue that this is the only way to ensure that separatists who they "know" are guilty do not evade justice. But in the world's largest democracy, many in the security forces appear to believe it is easier to kill suspects than to gather evidence to secure convictions, while others kill for money or promotions, as they are often rewarded for their actions.</p> <p>The Indian government, while claiming a firm commitment to the protection of human rights, has consistently ignored violations by its security forces, at best attributing such acts to a few "bad apples." As this report demonstrates, however, the problems are systemic and require systemic changes in law, policy, and practice. And even assuming the problem is "bad apples," they are rarely investigated, let alone tried and convicted. This culture of impunity, fostered both by a lack of political will and by laws shielding the perpetrators, has led to an atmosphere where security forces believe they can get away with the most serious crimes without the threat of punishment.</p> <p>Not only has the Indian government disregarded the demands of Manipuris and the findings of its own government-appointed committees, it has ignored concerns and recommendations by United Nations human rights bodies. For example, in 1997 the UN Human Rights Committee said that the continued use of the AFSPA in Manipur was tantamount to using emergency powers and recommended that the application of these powers be monitored to ensure compliance with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).</p> <p>The UN Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions, Philip Alston, reported to the UN Human Rights Council in 2007 that despite the government of Manipur ordering "numerous inquiries into the alleged extrajudicial executions, none of them ultimately reached any meaningful conclusions." In 2007 the Committee on the International Convention on Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination called for India to repeal the AFSPA and to replace it "by a more humane Act" in accordance with the recommendation contained in the leaked Jeevan Reddy committee report. The Committee on the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women in February 2007 urged India to provide information on the steps being taken to abolish or reform the AFSPA and to ensure serious investigations and prosecutions of acts of violence against women by the military in so-called disturbed areas.</p> <p> <strong>Key Recommendations</strong> </p> <ul> <li>The government of India, the state government of Manipur, and all militant groups should place human rights protection mechanisms at the center of any attempt to resolve the conflict and ensure compliance with international human rights and humanitarian law.</li> <li>The government of India should repeal the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958 as recommended by the government-appointed Jeevan Reddy committee.</li> <li>The government of India and the state government of Manipur should investigate and prosecute government officials, including members of the armed forces, police, and paramilitary, responsible for human rights violations.</li> <li>The government of India should arrest and prosecute to the fullest extent of the law all those found responsible for the 2004 murder of Thangjam Manorama Devi.</li> <li>Armed groups should publicly denounce abuses committed by any militant group and ensure that there is appropriate accountability for such abuses.</li> <li>Armed groups should immediately stop the abduction and recruitment of children into their forces.</li> </ul> <p> <strong>Methodology</strong> </p> <p>In early 2008, Human Rights Watch travelled to Manipur to investigate the human rights situation. With the assistance of human rights activists and lawyers, we investigated 18 cases of torture and extrajudicial killing since 2006. We interviewed government officials, army officers, police officials, politicians, lawyers, journalists, and human rights defenders. We conducted over 60 interviews in Manipur and supplemented with follow-up research through August 2008.</p> <p>For Manorama's case, we met with Manorama's family, the lawyers who are pursuing her case, and Judge Upendra Singh, who conducted an investigation into the incident.</p> <p>Most interviews with victims or their families were conducted privately. In some cases we used local NGO partners as translators. We also held group discussions with some activists, such as the members of the Meira Paibi.</p> <p>Since there is an ongoing dialogue between the government and some of the groups operating in the hill districts of Manipur, counter-insurgency operations have reduced in scale. Most of the operations are in the Manipur valley to contain the Meitei and Muslim groups. Our investigations were thus limited to the valley areas.</p> <p>In order to protect victims and others who might face reprisals by either side for speaking about them, names and any information that might identify them, such as places where interviews were held or specific dates of those meetings, have in certain cases been withheld.</p> http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/248327.html indian army kashmir public 0 http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/248100.html Tue, 09 Apr 2013 11:51:16 GMT Aboard the Opportunists’ Bandwagon http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/248100.html <p> <em>By Zara Zulfiqar <br /> </em> <strong> <a href="http://www.zoneasia-pk.com/ZoneAsia-Pk/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=10586:aboard-the-opportunists-bandwagon&amp;catid=70:free-talk&amp;Itemid=84" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"> <strong>ZoneAsia-Pk</strong> </a> </strong> </p> <p> <img src="file:///D|/ZoundryRaven/resourcestore/zrclip_001p2ce7c477.png" height="166" width="300" /> </p> <p>The Syrian opposition bloc has had its eyes on a seat in the Arab League for weeks now, and is likely to push the demand further to the UN and OIC (Organization of Islamic Countries) as the self proclaimed representative of the Syrian people. Since the Arab League distanced itself from Assad, and after failed attempts to reach some mutual political solution, the League asked Assad's opposition to join the bandwagon. On 27 March 2013, Qatar went another notch ahead by allowing the Syrian opposition to open their embassy.</p> <p>This weekend events caught pace dramatically. Barack Obama has decided to hold meetings with all the Sunni leaders in the region backing the opposition. These include Turkey, Jordan, Qatar and the UAE. These meetings, to be held over the next few months, starting April 16th, will allow Obama to gauge the varying demands within the opposition and region, and channelize them to gain momentum against Assad's regime. Disparate political, geographical and religious standpoints have landed these saviors in a critical deadlock. The infighting between the opposition groups has been a major factor for their failure so far. For Obama these meetings will cover more than just dilemma if the Syrian opposition. It will be an opportunity to bring Arab nations on board for the Palestine/Israel issue which is critical to relations between West and Muslim World.</p> <p> <a href="http://www.zoneasia-pk.com/ZoneAsia-Pk/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=10586:aboard-the-opportunists-bandwagon&amp;catid=70:free-talk&amp;Itemid=84" rel="nofollow"> <strong>Read more...</strong> </a> </p> http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/248100.html public 0 http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/248005.html Tue, 09 Apr 2013 11:45:23 GMT Fast Food: making you fat even faster http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/248005.html <p> <strong> <a href="http://area148.com/cms/index.php/social_issues/health/fast-food-making-you-fat-even-faster" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Area 14/8</a> </strong> </p> <p>It's time to chose quality over convenience.</p> <p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"> <img src="file:///D|/ZoundryRaven/resourcestore/zrclip_001n2de372e7.png" height="231" width="266" /> </p> <p>The not so recent rage over fast food hit Pakistan more than a decade ago when finally McDonalds decided to open in Lahore in 1998. What a milestone for Pakistan that was,when hopeful businessmen competed in a rat race to own the franchise. McDonalds has more than 30,000 outlets worldwide in 121 countries. Of these there are 27 in Pakistan,where families go with their children to stuff French fries and burgers,sugar drenched milkshakes and coffees. For all the right reasons McDonalds has become the face of the modern fast food fixation that has hit billions worldwide. Started in 1955 in Illinois,today McDonald's restaurants serve 69million customers per day.</p> <p> <strong> <strong>Read more...</strong> </strong> </p> http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/248005.html public 0 http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/247731.html Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:27:43 GMT PAKISTAN SHAMED!! http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/247731.html <p><em>By Ghalib Sultan <br /></em><a href="http://area148.com/cms/index.php/law_order/pakistan-shamed" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Area 14/8</a></p> <p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"><a href="http://area148.com/cms/index.php/law_order/pakistan-shamed" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><img src="file:///D|/ZoundryRaven/resourcestore/zrclip_001p5f021b6a.png" height="252" width="377" /></a></p> <p>The picture on top says it all. A mob in the background and an exultant youth in the foreground with smoke, fire and burning homes all around. This was the scene in the heart of Lahore when Christian homes were set on fire because of alleged blasphemy by a Christian who had already been booked under the Blasphemy Law by the police on the complaint of a Muslim. The mob that went on the rampage looting and burning homes was apparently venting their rage. No one died and no injuries were reported but Pakistan's image was destroyed beyond repair-collateral damage from the point of view of the bigoted and the intolerant but a mortal blow to Pakistan for those whose heads hung in shame.</p> <p>Now that the smoke has blown away, compensatory payments made to those who lost everything, the rebuilding process begun and some arrests made a clearer picture is slowly emerging. The Police advised the people to run for their lives hours before the mob arrived and they ran-the men, the women, the aged and the children all ran for their lives in all directions away from their homes leaving everything behind. Why did the police do this-to facilitate looting and burning, to save lives or because they did not want or could not face down the mob to protect lives and property? If the Police had advance information did this information flow upwards and if it did was it ignored? And if it did not then why not?</p> <p>There are credible reports that the mob came prepared for their grisly task---with sticks, stones, gasoline cans etc. If so then this was no spontaneous venting of rage. This was a well planned event for which a large number of people had been mustered and prepared. If this was planned then who was behind it?- those who wanted the land on which the colony was built?- or those who had political motives and wanted to undermine the political administration in Punjab or was it a combination of both?. The land mafia would have known the consequences of such an atrocity and it is unlikely that they actually believed that the land would fall in their lap after the pillage. The political motive is more plausible and is also borne out by the fact that after the attack on the Christians some apparently counter attacks were organized on the pride and joy of the Punjab government-the new Metrobus system.</p> <p>The Punjab government moved quickly to limit the damage and to begin rehabilitation work. An inquiry has also been ordered and arrests made. No doubt that there has been political fall-out but on the positive side people have rallied in support of the Christian community and against the forces of bigotry and intolerance that exist in society. There have been many previous incidents of this kind but never has exemplary punishment been awarded to deter such behavior. In the final analysis the blame must also go to people who are ready to undertake such criminal and reprehensible behavior.</p> http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/247731.html pakistan muslims lahore public 0 http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/247501.html Fri, 01 Mar 2013 12:00:18 GMT Tacstrat Analysis: The Haqqani question http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/247501.html <p><a href="http://tacstrat.com/content/index.php/2013/03/01/the-haqqani-question/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Tacstrat Analysis</a></p> <p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"><img src="file:///D|/ZoundryRaven/resourcestore/zrclip_001n129422e5.png" style="WIDTH: 297px; HEIGHT: 199px" height="250" width="415" /></p> <p>Many analysts have taken up various positions on the subject of the United States, Pakistan and the controversial Haqqani Network. Tough calls have demanded that Pakistan be declared a rogue state, all aid suspended to the country and sanctions imposed. Others digress and say sanctions on Pakistan did not really work. Not only did Pakistan successfully test its nuclear capabilities, the economic toll of the sanctions nearly led to the breaking up of the small state. Unemployment rose exponentially, political tensions led to the overthrow of a democratic government and resulted in a military leadership that ruled over the country for another 9 years. Setting aside the age-old debate on whether sanctions really do work, one must accept the fact that sanctions, in Pakistan's case, are not a pragmatic option.</p> <p>As recently as March 1, the United States government has flexed its muscle over the Iran-Pakistan pipeline deal and implied, with strong undertones, that Pakistan should avoid any activity that would invite sanctions. Realistically speaking, the United States in unlikely to impose any such sanctions, over Iran OR the Haqqani Network.</p> <p><strong><strong></strong></p> <p><strong><strong><strong>Read more...</strong></strong></strong></p></strong> http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/247501.html quetta pakistan united states iran public 0 http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/247185.html Tue, 26 Feb 2013 09:13:58 GMT Propaganda: the (blatant) Indian way http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/247185.html <p><strong><a href="http://www.zoneasia-pk.com/ZoneAsia-Pk/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=10267:propaganda-the-blatant-indian-way&amp;catid=70:free-talk&amp;Itemid=84" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">ZoneAsia-Pk</a></strong></p> <p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"><img src="file:///D|/ZoundryRaven/resourcestore/zrclip_001n121d750a.png" height="274" width="300" /></p> <p>Indian media can be called many things - free, vibrant, opinionated - but if there is one thing it cannot be called is subtle. The Indian media has had a long history of bias, Pakistan-bashing and a general lack of uniformity on national issues.</p> <p>When the gang rape story broke in December, there was an intense media debate in India about the consequences of the tragedy on the country. The Indian Express advocated reform and called for a safe environment in the country on its Op-Ed pages. The Hindu, on the other hand, took off on a different tangent and discussed the need for death penalty and castration for rapists. The Times of India chose to remain on the fences, calling for "long term solutions." The Asian Age focused on the political fall-out of the gang rape. Navbharat Times, on the other hand, filled its Op-Ed pages with a debate on the oppressed classes of the Indian society and raised an entirely existential question. Nai Dunya, went off in a completely different direction, and called for an end to protests since laws could not be "made over night."</p> <p>However, this is tame compared to some of the attacks the Indian media has made on its national athletes. And that onslaught is nothing compared to the continuous Pakistan-bashing that occurs every time wind blows from the west. Over the years, the Pakistani establishment has consistently demanded that the Indian media tone down its anti-Pakistan stance for better Indo-Pak relations. Several times over the years, former president General (r) Pervez Musharraf has blasted the Indian media for fabricating stories about Pakistan's military. Furthermore, Pakistan High Commissioner to India Salman Bashir said in an interview, "Pakistan-bashing has become fashionable in India whenever there is an issue." Pakistan's Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar also said several times that she was saddened by the constant barrage of negative comments emanating from the other side of the border.</p> <p>"Pakistan and India are both important countries of South Asia. It is imperative that they demonstrate requisite responsibility for ensuring peace by addressing all concerns through dialogue. Rhetoric and ratcheting up of tensions is certainly counterproductive. We are saddened and disappointed at the continued negative statements emanating from India both from the media as well as certain Indian leaders. For its part, Pakistan has observed a measured and deliberate self-restraint in our public statements on India. This has been done keeping in view the interest of peace in the region," said Khar.</p> <p>The LoC, Pakistan-India cricketing rivalries, political and security debates aside, the latest stunt pulled by the Indian media was worthy of a good laugh.</p> <p>In the wake of the Hyderabad blasts in India that left 16 dead and 117 injured, the Indian security forces issued a statement that slain Pakistani MQM leader Manzar Imam was the mastermind behind the attack. Within a few hours of this statement, the Indian media men dug out a photograph of Manzar Imam and declared him the chief terrorist behind the incident. Except the fact that Imam had been killed in a targeted attack a few weeks ago. It took them another few hours to realize their mistake and retract their statements.</p> <p>This incident, again, just goes to prove how the Indian media looks for any outside sources to blame without looking inwards for their own security woes.</p> <p>The Indian Home Minister Shinde announced in a statement that they had been expecting some form of retaliation after two high-profile hangings - Afzal Guru and Ajmal Kasab. If it was expected, perhaps the Indian journalists should focus their energies at investigating how there was such a massive security failure in one of their busiest, most populous cities instead of pointing fingers on dead men across the border.</p> <p>In every journalism course there is a section on media ethics and responsibility. It seems that either the Indian journalists missed those important classes or need to revisit them once more.</p> http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/247185.html indian media ajmal kasab public 0 http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/246833.html Fri, 08 Feb 2013 11:27:55 GMT Area 14/8: Who will provide affirmative action in India? http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/246833.html <p><strong><a href="http://area148.com/cms/index.php/law_order/opression/who-will-provide-affirmative-action-in-india" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Area 14/8</a></strong></p> <p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"><img src="file:///D|/ZoundryRaven/resourcestore/zrclip_001p399ef436.png" height="279" width="226" /></p> <p>Consumed with weapon purchases, maritime capabilities and external threats from China and Pakistan, India has it seems neglected to peek at the state of affairs within its own boundaries. In the past few months, multiple incidents infringing the right of freedom of speech have occurred which has prompted writer Salman Rushdie to smear India with his "cultural emergency" allegation.</p> <p>Although Rushdie's credibility is uncertain and his agenda equally debatable, his accusation rings of the truth. India's cultural intellect, its writers, poets, film makers and artists are being censured if their opinion and expression does not conform to the mainstream perceptions of India. Recently, a Tamil film called Vishwaroopam was condemned by Muslim religious groups in Tamil Nadu since it projected Muslims in a negative light. The government decided to ban the release of the film claiming that they lacked sufficient police forces to monitor all cinema houses for riots. Vishwaroopam's producer, Kamal Haasan was so disillusioned that he threatened to leave India for a secular state abroad. Eventually, he agreed to cut some scenes from the film.</p> <p>Elsewhere, renowned sociologist, Ashis Nandy, was attacked for insulting unprivileged classes by drawing links between corruption and "other backward classes, scheduled casters and scheduled tribes" at the Jaipur Literary Festival. A case was registered against him by Rajpal Meena, Chairperson of the SC/ST Rajasthan Manch, and subsequently, he was <a href="http://ibnlive.in.com/news/charges-against-ashis-nandy-and-the-punishment-that-he-faces/369503-40-100.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">charged</a> with the Prevention of Atrocities Act.</p> <p>The controversial Salman Rushdie also made headlines when he accused the West Bengal government of deliberately hatching a plan to prevent his participation in Kolkata Literary Meet for the promotion of his new novel, "Midnight's Children". Even last year, protests and death threats had compelled him to cancel his visit to the Jaipur Literature Festival.</p> <p>There are many other instances where unconventional news or statements have been targeted. India ranked a shocking 140th out of 179 countries on the Press Freedom index, issued by Reporters Without Borders. Reporter Soorinje would attest to this fact. He was <a href="http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/soorinjes-arrest-termed-a-blatant-attempt-to-muzzle-the-press/article4277156.ece" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">arrested</a> for multiples offences including criminal conspiracy, rioting with deadly weapons and using criminal force on a woman with the intention of outraging her modesty. Soorinje's report on an attack on a birthday celebration involving Muslims at a homestay in Mangalore had held right wing extremists Hindu Jagarana Vedike responsible. Similarly, two women were arrested in last November when they Facebook comments offended followers of Bal Thackeray.</p> <p>India should not be singled out for rising social discontent over freedom of speech. There are many such cases present in modernized societies too. The real issue concerning India is why the government chooses to be a part of this oppression? This is the government which likes to highlight itself as a democratic pluralistic nation where people of different religions, ethnicities, races and social statuses reside in harmony.</p> <p>The government uses the maintenance of law and order as a justification for its extreme measures. But is law and order code for protecting parties' mandate? In West Bengal similar to Tamil Nadu, people believed extreme steps were taken by the government to prevent any ill-will with Muslim voters. Are these infringements on the freedom of speech a political game only? Politicians may indeed be using cultural intellectuals as easy targets to keep the public distracted from pressing issues like poverty and unemployment.</p> <p>It may not be just that the government is afraid of extremists; it may even share the same sentiments. Many state officials include hardliners like members of the Bharatiya Janata Party( BJP) sparking suspicions about state-sponsored terrorism. India's Home Minister <a href="http://www.firstpost.com/politics/rss-bjp-camps-promoting-hindu-terrorism-shinde-595040.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">admitted</a> to the involvement of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and BJP in promoting terrorism within the country and placing the blame on minority communities. Just recently, BJP was very vocal in banning Pakistani writers from attending a literary festival in India.</p> <p>Freedom of speech is guaranteed in the Indian Constitution under Article 19. However, this freedom is subject to certain limitations such as "public order", "decency or morality" and "security of the State". The Supreme Court seems to be maintaining a low profile in controlling the government's outbursts of actions. In Nandy's case,for example, it stayed the arrest but also supported the state's response saying that an "idea" is capable of inflicting harm.</p> <p>Indian has failed to implement affirmative action. Since the government is not longer impartial, it is now up to the masses to reclaim their right to the freedom of speech.</p> http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/246833.html bal thackeray terrorism muslims china pakistan rss bjp india tamil nadu incredible india public 0 http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/246735.html Thu, 07 Feb 2013 11:51:33 GMT Tacstrat Analysis: Procrastination over the Pipeline http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/246735.html <p><a style="BORDER-BOTTOM: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; LINE-HEIGHT: 1.62em; BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); MARGIN: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; FONT-FAMILY: &amp;quot;Droid Sans&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Helvetica Neue&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Nimbus Sans L&amp;quot;, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(33,117,155); FONT-SIZE: 15px; VERTICAL-ALIGN: baseline; BORDER-TOP: 0px; BORDER-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-TOP: 0px" href="http://tacstrat.com/content/index.php/2013/02/07/procrastination-over-the-pipeline/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://spearheadresearch.org/SR_CMS/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/tacstrat-logo-150x58.jpg" style="BORDER-BOTTOM: rgb(238,238,238) 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(238,238,238) 1px solid; PADDING-BOTTOM: 5px; LINE-HEIGHT: 1.62em; BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(252,252,252); MARGIN: 0px 24px 0px 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 5px; FONT-FAMILY: &amp;quot;Droid Sans&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Helvetica Neue&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Nimbus Sans L&amp;quot;, sans-serif; MAX-WIDTH: 100%; HEIGHT: auto; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51); FONT-SIZE: 15px; VERTICAL-ALIGN: baseline; BORDER-TOP: rgb(238,238,238) 1px solid; CURSOR: default; BORDER-RIGHT: rgb(238,238,238) 1px solid; PADDING-TOP: 5px; box-shadow: rgb(238, 238, 238) 0px 0px 3px" height="58" width="150" alt="1_tacstrat logo" /></a></p> <p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"><a href="http://tacstrat.com/content/index.php/2013/02/07/procrastination-over-the-pipeline/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><img src="file:///D|/ZoundryRaven/resourcestore/zrclip_001p68b864ba.png" height="244" width="200" /></a></p> <p>Conceived by a Pakistani civil engineer in the 1950s, and brought on the table between the concerned parties in 1995, the Iran-Pakistan-India pipeline project has remained on the forefront, and brushed aside with an unbecoming ease. The pipeline that aims to connect Iran's biggest gas field in South Pars with neighboring Pakistan and India has become a matter of global interest. Pakistan's energy crisis and Iran's economic boycott, owing to the Khomeini regime's adamancy with respect to their nuclear program, make the pipeline a win-win bargain for the two. Yet, with Pakistan's instability, and an inability to pick a side, the pipeline, as we enter 2013, remains a far fetched thought. Despite recent positive angle, and signing of contracts on 4 February 2012 between the two governments, we realize this is not the first time Pakistan has come so close and withdrawn.</p> <p>Summer 2012 took the energy crisis to new heights altogether. With load-shedding in many of Punjab's housing colonies at a shocking 20 hours a day, the gap between supply and demand had reached a shocking 40%. The battlefield over Punjab's assailing energy shortage became the perfect ground to exploit political grievances. At steak mostly remains Punjab's once flourishing industrial sector. With 'thermal power' as the only reliable alternative, the high cost of this substitute has shut down various plants. Those still functioning, owing to the expenses of productions fail to compete in the market where growing economies like Bangladesh are standing on the same platform. Moreover, private power houses have either slashed down production, or shut down completely because of the government's failure to pay them.</p> <p>While Pakistan gets embroiled in a circular debt, that stood at a tall $880 million last summer, as the government pays only when the power generation houses are on the verge of suing, structural problems fail to be addressed, and the sloppy mammoth continues to move at its own painfully slow pace. Pakistani academics, politicians and technocrats, with the help of allies have looked into various regional and local solutions. A heated debate was over the Kalabagh dam. Theoretically the dam could have also prevented half of Punjab and Sindh from flooding, and millions worth of damage (not to mention the lives), but as a solution to our energy crisis, the local and federal cannot agree on a solution. Secondly, the United States, that wants to isolate Iran, and simultaneously make the Afghan and Central Asian bloc economically superior, expects Pakistan to conform.</p> <p>A third option, newly tapped, is cashing on the hot, sunny sweltering heat of the plains, more specifically the sunlight. November 2012 the Punjab government signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with the German government. The best part about solar panels is it's a onetime investment and runs for free on sunlight on its own. With the PML-N working on these alternatives, it is understood by the federal government that the power shortage entails Pakistan cannot be selective, but must look into multiple sources. The solar project, if executed effectively alone can tap part of the than 2.4 million megawatts of light energy going to waste. Renewable sources a safe and environment friendly solution.</p> <p>Looking into innovative ways to resolve the energy deficit, which is taking a grave toll on Pakistan's industry and standard of life, however is not sufficient. At this point Pakistan, like in most critical political points, is again torn between two opposing ends. Our alliance with the United States, India's silent conformity, Pakistan remains in a tough loop. The United States wants to isolate Iran: straight, blunt, and no flowery diplomacy to coat that bitter pill. Iran has failed to play the game by the standards of the 'peace decorum' and since the IAEA remains dissatisfied with their nuclear aspirations, the only option is to boycott Iran, impose economic sanctions. The sanctions have been showing their impact and unless the Khomeini government builds alliances in the region, to successfully bypass the international 'payment' transactions, there is little hope for them economically.</p> <p>Pakistan hence becomes a key player, and one that has to make a quick decision. Only two weeks back Hilary Clinton made it clear that joining hands with Iran will only force the United States to blacklist Pakistan as well. And of course, given the fragile state of our economy who wants to be in the bad books of international coercion squad? A vicious cycle once again. The pros versus cons of going ahead with the pipeline project have been contemplated for years now. There is no solution. India had the luxury of backing out. Firstly, after economic steak (to begin with the capital to invest), India's economic well being to a great degree is dependent of the success of the TAPI pipeline (Tajikistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India). The United States also signed a nuclear contract, a polite way of returning the favor. In Pakistan's case, the promise of TAPI in the long run, with any compensation remains an unattractive bargain. Also, a general rough patch with the United States since the war on terror has made Pakistan suspicious of the US' word. It would be accurate to say the United States has been a fair weathered friend.</p> <p>Regional stability and keeping our options open on the diplomatic grid seem to be smarter options. The United State's threats have made Pakistan cautious. Two years ago the pipeline, in the imagination of Tehran and Islamabad stood exactly where it stands today. By 2014, we had projected the project to be complete and pumping. And yet as Islamabad chooses to procrastinate, the energy, economic and law and order situations worsen. Tehran shook hands with Islamabad this Monday, 4 February 2013. For the domestic government to actually go forward with this decision would be a bold move, sound to have consequences. Could Balochistan's security worsen, or perhaps another shootout at the Afghan-Pakistan border, we can only find out. But taking a firm stand today is a far better move than waiting for a miracle from the land of broken promises.</p> http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/246735.html sindh pml-n public 0 http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/246386.html Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:13:29 GMT “Myth of Mohandas K. Gandhi” http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/246386.html <p> <em>By Velu Annamalai,Ph.D. <br /> </em> <strong> <a href="http://area148.com/cms/index.php/speakers_corner/myth-of-mohandas-k-gandhi" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Area 14/8</a> </strong> </p> <p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"> <img src="file:///D|/ZoundryRaven/resourcestore/zrclip_001n6bcc7af3.png" height="188" width="142" /> </p> <p>Dr. Martin Luther King,Jr. might have heard the word of non-violence from Gandhi,but it is certain that Dr. King did not know the true colors of Mr. Gandhi. From the beginning to the end,M.K. Gandhi was loyal to imperialism. The Western news media and their Indian allies by a massive propaganda exercise created the illusion of sainthood around Gandhi and made people believe that he fought Apartheid in South Africa,and in the process of doing so developed a new method of non-violent struggle called satyagraha. Nothing is farther from the truth.</p> <p> <span>Gandhi,for the major part of his life,worshipped British imperialism and too often proudly proclaimed himself a lover of the Empire. He was Kipling's Gunga Din in flesh and blood.</span> </p> <p>To understand Gandhi's politics in South Africa,it is essential to note the three fundamental trends which all along persisted underneath all his activities. They were:(1) his loyalty to the British Empire,(2) his apathy with regard to the Indian "lower castes",India's indigenous population,and (3) his virulent anti-African racism.</p> <p>Gandhi was once thrown out of a train compartment which was reserved exclusively for the Whites. It was not that Gandhi was fighting on behalf of the local Africans that he broke the rule in getting into a Whites'compartment. No! that was not the reason. Gandhi was so furious that he and his merchant caste Indians (Banias) were treated on par with the local Africans. This is the real reason for his fighting race discrimination in South Africa,and he had absolutely no concern about the pitiable way the Africans were treated by the Whites.</p> <p>On June 2,1906 he commented in the Indian Opinion that "Thanks to the Court's decision,only clean Indians (meaning upper caste Hindu Indians) or colored people other than Kaffirs,can now travel in the trains."</p> <p>During the `Kaffir Wars'in South Africa he was a regular Gunga Din,who volunteered to organize a brigade of Indians to put down the Zulu uprising and was decorated himself for valor under fire.</p> <p>Gandhi said on September 26,1896 about the African people:"Ours is one continued struggle sought to be inflicted upon us by the Europeans,who desire to degrade us to the level of the raw Kaffir,whose occupation is hunting and whose sole ambition is to collect a certain number of cattle to buy a wife,and then pass his life in indolence and nakedness."</p> <p>Again in an editorial on the Natal Municipal Corporation Bill,in the Indian Opinion of March 18,1905,Gandhi wrote:"Clause 200 makes provision for registration of persons belonging to uncivilized races (meaning the local Africans),resident and employed within the Borough. One can understand the necessity of registration of Kaffirs who will not work,but why should registration be required for indentured Indians…?"</p> <p>Again on September 9,1905,Gandhi wrote about the local Africans as:"in the majority of cases it compels the native to work for at least a few days a year"(meaning that the locals are lazy).</p> <p>Nothing could be farther from the truth that Gandhi fought against Apartheid,which many propagandists in later years wanted people to believe. He was all in favor of continuation of White domination and the oppression of Africans in South Africa.</p> <p>In the Indian Opinion of March 25,1905,Gandhi wrote on a Bill regulating fire-arms:"In the instance of fire-arms,the Asiatic has been most improperly bracketed with the natives.</p> <p>The British Indian does not need any such restrictions as are imposed by the Bill on the natives regarding the carrying of fire-arms. The prominent race can remain so by preventing the native from arming himself. Is there the slightest vestige of justification for so preventing the British Indians?"</p> <p>Gandhi always advised Indians not to align with other political groups in either colored or African communities. He was strongly opposed to the commingling of races. In the Indian Opinion of September 4,1904,Gandhi wrote:"Under my suggestion,the Town Council (of Johannesburg) must withdraw the Kaffirs from the Location. About this mixing of the Kaffirs with the Indians I must confess I feel most strongly. It think it is very unfair to the Indian population,and it is an undue tax on even the proverbial patience of my countrymen."</p> <p>In the Indian Opinion of September 24,1903,Gandhi said:"We believe as much in the purity of races as we think they (the Whites) do…by advocating the purity of all races."</p> <p>Again on December 24,1903,in the Indian Opinion Gandhi stated that:"so far as British Indians are concerned,such a thing is particularly unknown. If there is one thing which the Indian cherishes more than any other,it is purity of type."</p> <p>When he was fighting on behalf of Indians,he was not fighting for all the Indians,but only for his rich merchant class upper caste Hindus!</p> <p>In the Anglo-Boer War of 1899,Gandhi,in spite of his own belief that truth was on the side of the Boers,formed an ambulance unit in support of the British forces. He was very earnest about taking up arms and laying down his life for his beloved Queen. He led his men on to the battlefield and received a War Medal.</p> <p>Gandhi joined in the orgy of Zulu slaughter when the Bambata Rebellion broke out. One needs to read the entire history of Bambata Rebellion to place Gandhi's nazi war crimes in its proper perspective.</p> <p> <strong>A SELECTED LIST OF WORKS ABOUT MOHANDAS K. GANDHI</strong> </p> <p>Ambedkar,B.R. What Congress and Gandhi Have Done to the Untouchables. Bombay:Thacker,1945. <br /> Annamalai,Velu. Sergeant-Major M.K. Gandhi. Bangalore:Dalit Sahitya Akadiy,1995. <br /> Assisi,Francis. "Gandhi's Links with South Africa Examined."India West,28 Sep 1990:45. <br /> Assisi,Francis. "Mahatma Gandhi's Links with SA Blacks Questioned."News India,28 Sep 1990:1. <br /> Assisi,Francis. "Two New Books on Gandhiji."India West,28 Sep 1990:45. <br /> Das,Nani Gopal. Was Gandhiji a Mahatma? Calcutta:Dipali Book House,1988. <br /> Edwards,Michael. The Myth of the Mahatma. London:Constable,1986. <br /> Gandhi,Mohandas K. Untouchability. Edited by Bharatan Kumarappa. Ahmedabad:Navajivan Publishing House,1954. <br /> Grenier,Richard. The Gandhi Nobody Knows. Nashville:Thomas Nelson,1983. <br /> Grenier,Richard. "The Gandhi Nobody Knows."Commentary (Mar 1983):59-72. <br /> Huq,Fazlul. Gandhi:Saint or Sinner? Foreword by V.T. Rajshekar. Bangalore:Dalit Sahitya Akadiy,1991. <br /> Kapur,Sudarshan. Raising Up a Prophet:The African-American Encounter with Gandhi. Boston:Beacon Press,1992. <br /> Rajshekar,V.T. Hinduism,Fascism and Gandhism:A Guide to Every Intelligent Indian. Bangalore:Dalit Sahitya Akadiy,1984. <br /> Rajshekar,V.T. Why Godse Killed Gandhi? Bangalore:Dalit Sahitya Akadiy,1986. <br /> Rajshekar,V.T. Clash of Two Values:Mahatma Gandhi and Babasaheb Ambedkar (The Verdict of History). Bangalore:Dalit Sahitya Akadiy,1989.</p> <p> <em>Velu Annamalai,Ph.D.,a native of Tamil Nadu,India,is the President of the International Dalit Support Group and the author of Sergeant-Major M.K. Gandhi published by the Dalit Sahitya Akademy in Bangalore,India in 1995. He currently resides in New Orleans,Louisiana.</em> </p> http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/246386.html public 0 http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/246154.html Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:12:05 GMT Rev. Martin Luther King and Mahatma Gandhi http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/246154.html <p>Written by BALDEV SINGH <br /> <strong><a href="http://www.zoneasia-pk.com/ZoneAsia-Pk/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=10050:rev-martin-luther-king-and-mahatma-gandhi&amp;catid=35:internationalpolitics&amp;Itemid=60" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">ZoneAsia-Pk</a></strong></p> <p><img src="file:///D|/ZoundryRaven/resourcestore/zrclip_002n6a1182f4.png" height="200" width="300" /></p> <p>Dear Oprah,</p> <p>I am writing this letter because I think of you as an enlightened person. This letter is about the statements you made during the show you dedicated to the memory of Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King. During that show, you compared Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King with Mahatma Gandhi.</p> <p>In one of your statement you said something like "I wouldn't be here if it wasn't for Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King's sacrifice." Oprah, what about those countless unknown and unsung heroes, who preceded Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King. They too suffered hardships and sacrificed their lives for freedom and justice for the black people. As a matter of fact, black people revolted against slavery and started struggling for freedom the moment they were captured in Africa and the chains of slavery were put around their necks. Since that moment black people have expressed their suffering, sorrow, helplessness and burning desire for freedom and justice through their songs. That is the reason why black people have contributed so much for the creation and development of new music.</p> <p>The mentality or thinking, which was responsible for slavery, made it sure that the history of slavery and their struggle for freedom and justice is not known to the world. And if this story has to be told, then it must be told the way that "mentality" wants it to be told. There are people even today who think that slavery was benign and slaves were happy and contented with their situation. These people also justify colonial rule by saying, "It was necessary to civilize the uncivilized." On the contrary, it is our conviction that a civilized man doesn't deny another man's humanity. He doesn't enslave another man or subjugates another man in any form or manner- politically, economically, socially and religiously.</p> <p>Deliberate efforts have been made to blot out the history of slavery and black peoples' struggle for freedom and their contribution to human society in all walks of life. For instance, you go to any major city in the USA, you find all sorts of museums, but you don't find the one about slavery. The US Congress was very enthusiastic about Jewish holocaust museum in Washington D. C. However, the same Congress has been unwilling so far to establish a museum about slavery. Moreover, what about a holocaust museum of native Americans, the Indians? Whereas Jewish holocaust took place in Europe, the slavery of blacks and the genocide of the native people took place in the USA. I leave it for you to draw your own conclusion. However, I believe that it takes moral courage to look into the eyes of evil and not just empty moral rhetoric.</p> <p>The emergence of independent Africa had a major positive impact on the "black civil rights movement" in the United States and the anti apartheid movement in South Africa. It boosted the morale of these movements and brought worldwide recognition to Dr. Martin Luther King and Mr. Nelson Mandela. That's why, who knows how many "great men" were lynched in the United States and how many were tortured to death in solitary cells in South Africa before Dr. Martin Luther King and Mr. Nelson Mandela, respectively.</p> <p>During that show, you compared Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King with Mahatma Gandhi. I think your information about Mahatma Gandhi is probably based on the writings of European and Hindu "myth makers" (historians). Had you known the truth about Mahatma Gandhi, you wouldn't have said that Dr. Martin Luther King was following the policy of the great Mahatma Gandhi.</p> <p>I think it is disgraceful to compare Dr. Martin Luther King with Mahatma Gandhi. For example, whereas Dr. King represented the aspirations of all black people, Mahatma Gandhi represented the interest of only high caste Hindus who constituted 10-12% of the Indian population. Whereas Dr. King appealed to all Americans to rise above their prejudices of race, religion and gender to form a just society, Mahatma Gandhi was the mastermind behind the partition of India into two nations, one Hindu and the other Muslim. Here are some facts about Mahatma Gandhi.</p> <p>Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was born in the state of Gujrat in Baniya caste whose occupation is business. After obtaining a law degree from England he returned to India. However, after a short stay he decided to move to South Africa where he thought he could make more money. A large number of Indians from Gujrat State were brought to South Africa as indentured servants. Being a caste conscious Hindu, he looked down upon the natives. He used to say:</p> <p>I can see why a white man discriminates against an African, but why against us. We Indians have the same values, the white man has.</p> <p>Besides his law practice he worked for the British army recruiting Indians during the Boer War and the Zulu rebellion. He was the commander of an ambulance corps made up of Indians.</p> <p>The Bolshevik revolution of 1914 in Russia inspired worldwide nationalist movements against colonialism and dictatorships. To sabotage Indian national movement, the British colonists brought Gandhi to India. What the "myth makers" don't tell is that the Indian National Congress Party, which was later controlled by Gandhi was set up under the patronage of the British Government and it was dominated by high caste Hindus, who constituted only 10-12% of the Indian population. Anybody who was considered a threat to the interest of the British or high caste Hindus was thrown out of the party. The high caste Hindus, who had control over the Indian economy, also wanted to usurp political power after the departure of the British. But there was one formidable obstacle in their path to achieve this objective. And that obstacle was the Muslim majority states of Punjab, Bengal, Sindh, Blouchistan and Northwest Frontier.</p> <p>To exclude these Muslim dominant states from the Indian union, the Hindu leaders of Congress Party headed by Gandhi started making provocative statements to instill doubt and fear in the minds of Muslim population that their future in independent India under the control of Hindu majority was not safe. Muslim leaders started asking for constitutional guarantees to safeguard their future, which the Hindu leaders were not willing to provide.</p> <p>Frustrated, Muslim leaders asked for partition of the country to create a Muslim state. They did not see the trap that "high caste Hindus" had laid for them. They fell into that trap without realizing the impact their demand would have on the future generations of people of the Indian subcontinent. The stage was set for the partition of India into Muslim Pakistan and Hindu India. Gandhi and his associates congratulated each other for accomplishing their objective while holding Muslims responsible for the partition of the country. This is the legacy of Mahatma Gandhi for which future generations of Indians, Pakistanis and Bangladeshis would pay dearly, God knows for how long!</p> <p>The cruel and deceitful nature of Gandhi was revealed when he counseled Hindu and Sikh refugees, who came to see him in April 1947, after they were driven out of their homes following a terrible massacre of Hindus and Sikhs in the Ravalpindi area of Punjab. Gandhi asked them to go back to their homes, as he exhorted them that he wouldn't accept the partition of the country. He kept repeating like a parrot, "I won't allow the partition of the country. The country would be partitioned only over my dead body." You can imagine the level of his depravity, because his Congress Party had already accepted with his blessing the partition of the country as a condition for Independence. And a few months later on August 15, 1947 the Indian union was divided in two nations, one Muslim and the other Hindu.</p> <p>The claim that Gandhi won freedom for India peacefully without shedding a drop of blood is the biggest fabricated lie of the 20th century.</p> <p>Up to the start of World War II, the British government categorically rejected the demand for the independence of India in the immediate future. However, the situation changed dramatically after the war. The war was so devastating to the British power that their government found it impossible to build the infra structure and economy of the homeland while coping with the growing national liberation movements in the colonies. The British government wisely decided to grant freedom to its colonies.</p> <p>It wasn't Gandhi's movement which drove the British out of India, it was the impact of second world war, which made it impossible for the British to hold on to their Empire. Shortly after the independence of India, other colonies in Asia, Africa and Caribbean gained their independence peacefully. So what is so unique about India's independence? Had there been no World War II, India would still be a British colony!</p> <p>The other story that the "myth makers" do not tell is that the Independence of India was marked by one of the greatest upheavals of the 20th century. Two Indian states, Punjab and Bengal, were partitioned at the time of independence causing untold suffering and loss of life and property. In Punjab almost all the Hindu and Sikh population of about five millions were forced to leave their homes and properties on the Pakistan side where their ancestors had lived for hundreds of years. Similarly, about five million Muslims were forced to vacate their home and properties on the Indian side.</p> <p>In the ensuing communal frenzy and carnage, may be as many as one million people perished and thousands of women were kidnapped and raped. About one third of the population of Punjab was engulfed in the inferno created by the independence of India. Of the total population of about five and half million Sikhs, about 40% were rendered homeless due to Independence. The population of Bengal was much higher than that of Punjab and you can imagine the human suffering there! The claim that Gandhi won freedom for India peacefully is a cruel joke on Punjabis and Bengalis.</p> <p>To my knowledge only in two places, the United States of America and Ireland, the force of arms drove out the British colonists. Everywhere else the British freed the colonies peacefully. On what ground it is claimed that Gandhi won freedom for India peacefully without shedding a drop of blood.</p> <p>The claim that Gandhi worked for the uplift of Dalits (untouchables) is also a myth.</p> <p>Gandhi was a Hindu revivalist, who upheld every aspect of Hinduism including the caste system, which is the essence of Hinduism. His writings, speeches and statements confirm this.</p> <p>I don't believe the caste system to be an odious and vicious dogma. It has its limitations and defects, but there is nothing sinful about it. Harijan, 1933.</p> <p>I believe in Varnashrama (caste system) which is the law of life. The law of Varna (color and / or caste) is nothing but the law of conservation of energy. Why should my son not be scavenger if I am one? Harijan, 3-6-1947.</p> <p>He (Shudra, low caste) may not be called a Brahmin (uppermost caste), though he (Shudra) may have all the qualities of a Brahmin in this birth. And it is a good thing for him (Shudra) not to arrogate a Varna (caste) to which he is not born. It is a sign of true humility. Young India, 11-24-1927.</p> <p>According to Hindu belief, he who practices a profession which does not belong to him by birth, does violence to himself and becomes a degraded being by not living up to the Varna (caste) of his birth. Young India, 11-14-1927.</p> <p>As years go by, the conviction is daily growing upon me that Varna (caste) is the law of man's being, and therefore, caste is necessary for Christians and Muslims as it has been necessary for Hinduism, and has been its saving grace. Speech at Trivandrum, (Collection of Speeches), Ramanath Suman (1932).</p> <p>I would resist with my life the separation of "Untouchables" from the caste Hindus. The problem of the "Untouchable" community was of comparatively little importance. London Round Table Conference 1931.</p> <p>I call myself a Snatana man, one who firmly believes in the caste system. Dharma Manthan, p 4.</p> <p>I believe in caste division determined by birth and the very root of caste division lies in birth. Varna Vyavastha, p 76-77.</p> <p>The four castes and the four stages of life are things to be attained by birth alone. Dharma Manthan, p 5.</p> <p>Caste means the predetermination of a man's profession. Caste implies that a man must practice only the profession of his ancestors for his livelihood. Varna Vyavstha, p 28, 56, 68.</p> <p>Shudra only serves the higher castes as a matter of religious duty and who will never own any property. The gods will shower down flowers on him. Varna Vyavastha, p 15.</p> <p>I have noticed that the very basis of our thought have been severely shaken by Western civilization which is the creation of the Satan. Dharma Manthan, p 65.</p> <p>How is it possible that the Antyaja (outcastes) should have the right to enter all the existing temples? As long as the law of caste and karma has the chief place in the Hindu religion, to say that every Hindu can enter every temple is a thing that is not possible today. Gandhi Sikshan, Vol. 11, p 132.</p> <p>The caste system can't be said to be bad because it does not allow inter-dining and inter-marriages in different castes. Gandhi by Shiru, p129.</p> <p>If the Shudar (low caste) leave their ancestral profession and take up others, ambition will rouse in them and their peace of mind will be spoiled. Even their family peace will be disturbed. Hind Swaraj.</p> <p>The superiority of caste and race is deeply imbedded in the psyche of upper caste Hindus irrespective of their upbringing or the level of education or the place where they live. For example, in the words of a socialist leader, Madhu Limaye, "Nehru practiced both racism and casteism, despite his modern upbringing and outlook" (Telegraph, Calcutta, November 21, 1987).</p> <p>In a revealing passage about his "making", Nehru wrote, "Behind me lie somewhere in the sub-conscience, racial memories of hundred or whatever the numbers may be, generations of Brahmins. I cannot get rid of that past inheritance" (Jawaharlal Nehru, An Autobiography, (1936), Delhi, 1980, p 596.).</p> <p>Sir V. S. Naipaul is a Nobel laureate in literature. His Brahmin ancestors were brought as indentured servants to Trinidad long time ago. He grew up in Trinidad and has spent most of his life in England. In his earlier work An Area of Darkness, 1964 he was unforgiving of India. Later the "Brahmin" in him stirred up and came out spewing hatred and venom. He condoned the massacre of thousands of Sikhs in June 1984, when Indira Gandhi ordered a military attack on the Golden Temple complex on the day when thousands of Sikh pilgrims had gathered there to celebrate the martyrdom of Guru Arjan Dev (A Million Mutinies Now, 1990). In 1992 he justified the destruction of a 400 hundred-year-old mosque (Babri Masjid) by Hindu mobs lead by Bhartiya Janta Party (a fascist Hindu party) because of the mistreatment of Hindus by Muslim rulers centuries back in the past. He has become the darling of Hindu fascist organizations.</p> <p>Mahatma Gandhi, whose Baniya (Vaisha) caste is two steps lower than the uppermost Brahmin caste, was a vigorous defender of the caste system.</p> <p>"The caste system, in my opinion, has a scientific basis. Reason does not revolt against it. It has disadvantages. ………Caste creates a social and moral restraint……I can find no reason for their (castes) abolition. To abolish caste is to demolish Hinduism. There is nothing to fight against the Varnasharma (caste system). I don't believe the caste system to be an odious and vicious dogma. It has its limitations and defects, but there is nothing sinful about it" (Harijan, 1933).</p> <p>Gandhi's calling "Untouchables", as Harijans is a cruel joke on the Untouchables by an insensitive and depraved man.</p> <p>Harijan literally means "child of God". However, in India this label is used for the illegitimate children of temple girls (anchoress) fathered by priests. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar, the leader of the Untouchables, vehemently opposed Gandhi's use of Harijans for the Untouchables. Recently, Ms Mayawati, a leader of the Untouchables asked rhetorically, "If we are Harijans then what are the upper castes like Nehru, Gandhi and Patel? Are they bastards?"</p> <p>That Gandhi was an "apostle of peace" is not true.</p> <p>Gandhi was a "Hindu revivalist" and "Hindu politician" combined in one, who used nonviolence as a tool for political objectives. He used to coerce others to concede to his demands by threats of "going to fast unto death". He was no pacifist as is shown by his stand on the issue of Kashmir.</p> <p>"One naturally thought that he would offer a nonviolent solution to the Kashmir issue and raise his moral stature. But no! He proved to be a false prophet. Seervai has documented that nonviolence with him was a political weapon. (H. M. Seervai, Partition of India, Legend and Reality, Bombay, 1989, p 172-173). He sanctioned the use of armed forces and laid the foundation of Kashmir problem which continues to haunt the subcontinent till today" (Sangat Singh, The Sikhs in History, 4th ed., 2001, p 258.)</p> <p>According to Seervai, in a meeting with Viceroy Lord Wavell on August 27 1946, Gandhi thumped the table and said, "If India wants bloodbath, she shall have it and that if bloodbath was necessary, it would come about in spite of nonviolence." Wavell was dumbfounded at these words coming from the mouth of "apostle" of nonviolence.</p> <p>Gandhi was a very cunning man. He was not satisfied with the title of "apostle of peace", he also wanted to project himself as a holy man, which for a Hindu required the practice of celibacy. He was a married man and proclaimed to be celibate at a relatively young age under forty. However, he used to test his celibacy by asking young girls to lie over him to find out whether he was in full control of his sexual feelings. I leave up to psychologists and psychiatrists to analyze what was in Gandhi's mind and what happened to the emotions of those poor girls! He was always surrounded by women.</p> <p><strong>So what is Gandhi's legacy to mankind?</strong></p> <p>The obvious one is the partition of subcontinent into "Hindu India" and "Muslim Pakistan and Bangladesh". These three nations are a "living hell" for minorities. For example, India which claims with pride to be the biggest democracy in the world has killed more Indians in the last fifty years than the British colonists killed in 300 years. More than 95% of those killed by Hindu governments are Christians, Muslims, Sikhs and Dalits (Untouchables). While the populations of these countries are groaning under the weight of poverty, hunger, illiteracy, ignorance and disease, India and Pakistan have built nuclear weapons. The next nuclear war will most probably be fought over the disputed territory of Kashmir in spite of the fact that neither India nor Pakistan has ever asked the Kashmiris what they want.</p> <p>That Hindus are peace loving people and coexist peacefully with non-Hindus is also not true.</p> <p>When Taliban destroyed Lord Buddha's statue in Afghanistan, there were worldwide protests against this heinous crime against humanity. The most vociferous demonstrations and protests were held in India. However, how little did the Hindu mobs realize that the first damage to the statue was done by Hindu rulers of Afghanistan during the frenzy of Hindu revival? Buddhism flourished as a major religion in India for several centuries. During the Hindu revival, Buddhists were given three choices like Jews and Muslims during the Spanish Inquisition. Either convert or leave the country. Large number of Buddhists fled to neighboring countries. Those who resisted were killed, Buddhist monasteries were destroyed, monks were murdered, and nuns were raped. Buddhist literature was burned and their religious centers were converted into Hindu centers. The famous place in Bihar State where Lord Buddha is supposed to have received his light (knowledge) is still under the control of Hindus in spite of the protests of international Bhuddist community.</p> <p>The "myth makers" keep repeating that Hindus have lived peacefully with Muslims, Christians and others for hundreds of years. What they don't tell you is that during that period Muslims or the British ruled over the Indian territory. But look at the attitude of Hindus towards non-Hindus when Hindus were the rulers? During the revival of Hinduism they eradicated Buddhism from the land of its birth. All other progressive movements, which opposed the caste system were either crushed or subverted.</p> <p>Immediately after independence in 1947, the so-called secular and liberal Hindu rulers lead by Jawahar Lal Nehru adopted an Indian Constitution, declaring "Sikhs, Buddhists and Jains" as Hindus with the stroke of a pen. Sikhs have been protesting against this heinous crime ever since. No Hindu leader worth the name has ever protested against this abominable injustice to the minorities. Imagine! How would the minorities react if the US Congress were to pass a law declaring all minorities as Christians?</p> <p>The word Hindu is not found in any Hindu religious text or any other ancient writing. People who lived on the western side of Hindu Kush (killers of Hindus) mountains gave this name to the natives of India. The word Hindu means black, slave, robber, thief and a waylayer.</p> <p>From my discussions with Americans about the caste system over the years, I have the impression that most of them think that caste system is like segregation or apartheid. Caste system may look like segregation or apartheid on the surface, but if one were to scratch the surface one would find that the Brahmnical caste system is the worst oppressive and exploitative system that exists on planet earth. Slavery and segregation in America and apartheid in South Africa have ended in a relatively short period, but the heinous caste system, which has been practiced in India for thousands of years, is still going strong. It is because the caste system was invented, taught, practiced and ordained by the Brahmnical (Hindu) religion.</p> <p>Under segregation and apartheid the black people were denied their rights and had very few opportunities for advancement in comparison to white people. However, a black person under those circumstances could become a doctor, a teacher, and a minister or choose whatever occupation was available to them. Whereas the caste is stamped on you the moment you are born. There was no escape from this watertight multistory building with no stairs or ladder. You are born and die in the same caste, no matter how good or bad a person you are.</p> <p>For example, a person born in a scavenger's family would also be a scavenger in spite of his great intelligence. He couldn't choose any other occupation. So a scavenger's descendents remained scavengers for thousands of years. This destroyed the creativity of the Indian population. No wonder the Hindu civilization, which is as old as the Chinese civilization has made insignificant contribution to the development of human society in comparison to the Chinese civilization.</p> <p>It is a mistake to think that Nazism was the product of Hitler's sick mind. The roots of Nazism lie in the Hindu caste system. European colonists were intrigued by the Hindu caste system. They were astonished how Brahmins, who formed about 5% of India's population, were able to exploit the rest of Indians for thousands of years by asserting their caste and racial superiority. The British used the same Brahmnical strategy, they proclaimed their racial and intellectual superiority over Indians to control their vast Empire in India. At the pinnacle of British rule, there were only about 200,000 British personnel in India. Who you think managed the Empire? They were the brown-Englishmen (subjugated Indians) who managed the Empire.</p> <p>European writers like Max Muler were also fascinated by the Hindu caste system. They admired the way the Brahmins maintained the caste and racial superiority over thousands of years. Why shouldn't the Europeans assert their racial and intellectual superiority the same way over black, brown, tan and yellow people? So people like Max Muler planted the seeds of racial superiority on the European soil. Others like him nurtured the seedlings, and the plants came into full blossom under Hitler. It is no coincidence that the Nazis used swastika, a propitious Brahmin symbol, as the emblem of the Nazi party.</p> <p>I am willing to debate these issues with any one, anywhere, and on any stage.</p> <p>Authors Note: An article Gandhi as a racist by Dr. Velu Anamlai (USA) published in Sikh Virsa, June 1997, was consulted for writing this letter.)</p> http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/246154.html pakistan muslims mahatma gandhi hindus kashmir issue india americans public 0 http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/246011.html Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:18:18 GMT Role of Jews in world history http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/246011.html <p><strong>Interesting revelations!! What is the ultimate truth only God knows!!</strong></p> <p><em>Commentary By Jayne Gardener <br /></em><strong><a href="http://soskashmir.wordpress.com/2013/01/03/role-of-jews-in-world-history/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">SOS KASHMIR</a></strong></p> <p>I always used to wonder what it was about Jews that made people throughout history despise them. If they were indeed "God's chosen" I thought, they had to be the unluckiest people in the history of the world.</p> <p>Why were they persecuted throughout history? Why had the Nazis herded them into cattle cars and taken them to "extermination camps" to dispose once and for all of the "Jewish problem?"</p> <p>I suddenly recognized that if Hitler had developed a "Final Solution" to the Jewish question, that there had to have been a "Jewish Problem." Could the Jews have in any way behaved in such a manner that would make the countries in which they resided turn against them, or were they just unfortunate, innocent victims?</p> <p>I set out to find answers for my questions, mainly turning to the Internet, but also reading various books on the subject. What I found became increasingly disturbing to me. I had not known that throughout history, the Jews had been expelled from 79 countries, some countries more than once. I had not known that many of the <a href="http://truthseeker-archive.blogspot.com/2009/12/yanina-cywinskas-holy-hoax-tale-nazis.html" rel="nofollow">claims they made about the Holocaust that I had believed unquestioningly for so long were in fact fraudulent.</a></p> <p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"><img src="file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/Waqas%20Ahmad/Desktop/Historical%20Fact.JPG" style="WIDTH: 418px; HEIGHT: 291px" height="574" alt="Historical Fact.JPG" width="779" /></p> <p>The books I had read and the movies I had seen about the "Holocaust"and wept over were nothing but thinly veiled attempts to garner unwavering sympathy for the state of Israel and an excuse to extort billions of dollars from Germany and 1.25 billion dollars from the Swiss banks. I discovered that a book I had read many times as a teenager and cried about, Anne Frank's Diary, had been at least partially written by someone other than Anne Frank.</p> <p>I learned that the confessions at the Nuremburg Trials and the executions of so many German "war criminals" were extracted under torture and the defendants were being tried, judged and condemned by their very accusers.</p> <p>I learned about the "false flag" operations, especially the Lavon affair and the tragedy of the USS Liberty, an American ship that was attacked by the Israelis during the 1967 war. 34 young American men were killed and many more wounded. To add insult to injury, the Israelis claimed that it was simply an unfortunate case of mistaken identity, something the survivors of the Liberty have always vehemently denied. They, however, were threatened with court martial if they were ever to tell their stories.</p> <p>I learned about the Jonathan Pollard spy case and other incidents of Israeli Jews spying against their supposed "closest ally."</p> <p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"><img src="file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/Waqas%20Ahmad/Desktop/Gaza.JPG" style="WIDTH: 330px; HEIGHT: 252px" height="442" alt="Gaza.JPG" width="800" /></p> <p>I became shocked and horrified as I learned about the treatment of the Palestinian people in the occupied territories at the hands of the Israeli Defense Forces and the Jewish settlers. Israel purports to be the only democracy in the middle east, but it's only a democracy for Jews. Non-Jews are not considered equal. I was saddened to see pictures of innocent Palestinian children burned beyond recognition or suffering from serious gunshot wounds after being targeted by the IDF for no other reason than that they are Palestinian.</p> <p>I found out about the Jewish history of avariciousness, larceny, lying, manipulation and their questionable and usurious business practices.</p> <p>I learned about their roles in the radical homosexual movement, the radical feminist movement, the pornography industry as well as their over-representation in the abortion industry.</p> <p>I discovered their <a href="http://www.counter-currents.com/2012/08/jews-and-slavery-three-books-by-the-nation-of-islam/" rel="nofollow">role in organized crime, in the slave trade</a>, in the civil rights movement and in Communism, an ideology that is responsible for the deaths of untold millions and the repression of many millions more.</p> <p>I learned that it was Jewish supremacists behind the war against Christianity and Christmas. It is they who want God out of the Pledge of Allegiance and all symbols of Christianity removed from public life. They have driven Christianity from the public schools despite Christianity being the majority religion.</p> <p>They have taken Christmas out of the public school calendar despite the fact that it is a statutory holiday and it is named Christmas.</p> <p>I read about the anti-Genteelism and hatefulness of the Babylonian Talmud and their utter disrespect for, and hostility towards Jesus Christ, the Virgin Mary and Christianity and Christians in general.</p> <p>I learned about their "chutzpah" in claiming that Gentile lives were worth no more than the lives of barnyard animals but that they considered Jewish lives to be akin to God Himself. It's okay to steal from a Gentile or to kill a Gentile, but Jewish lives are sacred.</p> <p>I learned of their control of the majority of wealth, the media and academia despite them making up less than 2% of the population (even lower in Canada ). They are behind the ridiculous political correctness movement and hate crime legislation that was drafted so as to silence anyone who might figure out their agenda and attempt to shed light on it.</p> <p>Men like German Rudolf, David Irving and many more, previously recognized as great historians, were arrested, charged with hate crimes and incarcerated simply for having made academic inquiry into a specific period of history. Other so called "revisionists" or "holocaust deniers" have been intimidated, harassed, assaulted and smeared simply for trying to get at the truth.</p> <p>It is patently clear that the war in Iraq is due solely to Israel wanting to hobble her enemies by destabilizing their governments in order to achieve hegemony in the middle east. It would be unthinkable for Israeli Jews to die for this cause, so they manipulated the US into the war with the help of the Jewish Zionist " Israel firsters" in the Bush administration in order that the blood of way too many young American men and women is shed instead.</p> <p>It is they who control the middle eastern foreign policy of the most powerful country in the world, the USA . It is they who control congress, the senate and the puppet president, George W. Bush.</p> <p>They have such control in movies and television that we are now subjected to endless programs and Hollywood movies that mock Christianity, Christian values and degrade the traditional family.</p> <p>After sober reflection on what I had discovered about Jewish supremacy and Zionism, I had to abandon all my previously held notions as to the history of Jewish persecution. What I have trouble understanding is why they continue this behavior in whichever society they live, knowing that eventually they will overplay their hand and their perfidy will be exposed yet again. Has history taught them nothing?</p> <p>As more and more people become aware of what is going on and who is responsible for it, anger is going to rise as it already has in the former Soviet Union and eastern European countries. They may control television, movies and the print media, but they don't control the internet.</p> <p>At least not yet. Blogs and websites devoted to "outing" the Jewish supremacists will ultimately be their downfall. If everyone who sees this information passes it on to at least one other person, the crimes and misdeeds of the Jewish supremacists and Zionists will be exposed. Please, do your part. Pass it on. Our world as we know it is counting on you.</p> http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/246011.html jews public 0 http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/245572.html Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:34:26 GMT KASHMIR: TIME TO MOVE FORWARD http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/245572.html <p><em>By Air Commodore (R) Khalid Iqbal</em> <br /> <a href="http://spearheadresearch.org/SR_CMS/index.php/researchopinions/kashmir-time-to-move-forward" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Spearhead Research</a></p> <p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"><img src="file:///D|/ZoundryRaven/resourcestore/zrclip_001n7be8f045.png" height="252" width="351" /></p> <p>Indian Foreign Minister Salman Khurshid's recent wish that: 'it is high time India and Pakistan move forward together hand-in-hand', is rather captivating. Recent overtures from both sides clearly indicate that two neighbouring countries want prosperity in the region and for that they agree that resolution of all disputes, including Kashmir, is a priority.</p> <p>Pakistan has all along been pursuing this objective. It is unfortunate that some of very meaningful peace processes between the two countries went astray on one reason or the other. As Pakistan is likely to be a beneficiary in case of equitable resolution of most of territory related disputes, Pakistan is always keen to see the conclusive phase of the efforts aimed at resolving these issues. Unfortunately, the two countries have not been able to achieve anything worthwhile in territory related disputes.</p> <p>Indian Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh has recently said that India wants to resolve all issues, including Jammu and Kashmir, with Pakistan through dialogue. Indian Independence Act had laid down clear terms of reference for the rulers of princely states. They were given the choice to freely accede to either India or Pakistan, or to remain independent, while doing so they were to take into account the aspirations of their people. Ruler of Kashmir failed to do so, and while under duress, he invited the Indian armed forces to invade his own state.</p> <p>Kashmir is certainly at the pinnacle of India-Pakistan disputes - an issue recognized by the UN, and on which settlement framework has also been specified in the relevant UN resolutions. To remind the world about the continuation of the conflict, UN Observers mission continues to be stationed in the region. The first group of United Nations Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan (UNMOGIP) arrived in Jammu and Kashmir on 24 January of 1949 to supervise the ceasefire between India and Pakistan. The UNSC resolutions remain arguably the best and judicious way out for settling this dispute. While addressing the 67 <sup>th</sup>session of the General Assembly, President Zardari had rightly attributed the non-resolution of Kashmir dispute to the failure of the UN system.</p> <p>Therefore, to succeed, any durable peace initiative between Pakistan and India must cater to break the stalemate on this important issue. It would have been in the fitness of thing had the Indian foreign minister put forward any fresh proposals on the Kashmir issue as well. Without demonstration of political will to tackle the Kashmir depute, even fairy tale wishes remain, at best, just noble desires; devoid of implementation tools.</p> <p>Spells of Kashmir intifada, in their scope and scale, visibly get out of India's control despite Indian army's heavy presence. There is now considerable resistance from the Indian mainland as well, where conscientious members of the civil society have started to censure the central government for continued occupation of Kashmir. World watches with dismay that even by stationing of around 600,000 combatants for over a decade, India has not been able to subdue the spirit of Kashmir's of the IHK.</p> <p>IHK has the unenviable distinction of being the most militarised zone in the world. The hardest hit victim of the conflict has been the socio-economic fabric of the Kashmir. Agriculture which forms about 48 percent of the state domestic product is witnessing a negative growth. Tourism involving the livelihood of thousands of people has also been badly hit by the conflict. During October 2012, two reports were released pertaining human rights situation in the IHK. Reports by Amnesty International (AI) and Citizen's Council for Justice (CCJ) were released in a quick succession. Both dossiers have adequately exposed the deplorable Human Rights (HR) conditions in IHK.</p> <p>To make the people of Kashmir feel secure, it is necessary to scrap all the draconian laws like the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA), Public Safety Act, Disturbed Areas Act, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act etc. Moreover, as confidence building measure, it is essential to retrieve the armed forces to their barracks and let the police take care of the law and order. IHK government should also release all prisoners of conscience.</p> <p>Pakistan has consistently maintained its stance on Kashmir. It wants the resolution of Kashmir issue in line with the wishes of Kashmiri people, as ordained by a number of UN resolutions and as envisaged by universally accepted democratic principles of the right of self determination. Pakistan will continue diplomatic and political support of Kashmiri people in their struggle to achieve their right to decide their future.</p> <p>In this backdrop, Pakistan's Foreign Minister has extended an invitation to 8 members of the executive council of the All Parties Hurriyat Conference (APHC), to visit Pakistan from 15 to 22 December 2012. The initiative has been taken to begin a consultative process between the political leadership of Pakistan, AJK and pro-movement leaders of IHK. This initiative is expected to jump-start the process for peaceful resolution of Kashmir issue. Kashmir experts believe that such visits by the Hurriyat leadership suit both sides. Pakistan envisages that APHC could act as a catalyst in bridging the gap between the respective government's standpoint and public aspirations of the people of Kashmir.</p> <p>From Kashmiri perspective, leaders of both side of Kashmir should be facilitated to meet each other frequently to narrow down their perceptional gaps. And at the same time, India and Pakistan should continue with their good-will initiatives kick-started during President of Pakistan's <em style="BORDER-BOTTOM: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; FONT-STYLE: italic; MARGIN: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 15px; VERTICAL-ALIGN: baseline; BORDER-TOP: 0px; BORDER-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-TOP: 0px">non-state</em> visit to India, because this could enable both the countries to discover common grounds for conflict resolution. Pakistan feels that the Kashmiris of both sides should take advantage of the current improvement of relations between India and Pakistan, and it is in this context that APHC leadership has been invited.</p> <p>Rumours have it that under pressure from India's hawkish politicians and media elements, hurdles could be created to disrupt the process. Some elements of Indian media have started a negative campaign against the visit of APHC leaders branding them as 'Separatists'. Understandably, some elements from India are not sincere towards resolution of Kashmir issue through consultative process. They do not want Kashmiri leadership to visit Pakistan and interact with Pakistani and Kashmiri political leadership. Their motive is to jeopardize the consultative process initiated by Pakistan. These disruptive elements are focusing at creating divide within the pro-movement camp by allowing only a few leaders to visit Pakistan. It would be unfortunate if India lets this opportunity slip by through administrative manipulation to deny right of travel to all the invitees. This will indeed be the first test of the new foreign minister of India.</p> http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/245572.html manmohan singh indian army jammu kashmir issue kashmir dispute kashmir ihk public 0 http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/245482.html Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:17:07 GMT Ready, Steady, Go! : Re-visiting the Indo-Pak arms race http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/245482.html <p><a href="http://tacstrat.com/content/index.php/2012/11/30/ready-steady-go-re-visiting-the-indo-pak-arms-race/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Tacstrat Analysis</a></p> <p><img src="file:///D|/ZoundryRaven/resourcestore/zrclip_001p273cc142.png" height="83" width="504" /></p> <p>In a world of shrinking economies and rising deficits, it is still interesting to see India spike its defense budget by 17%. It is reportedly investing in air, naval and ground facilities like fighter planes, aircraft carriers, missiles, sub marines and helicopters.</p> <p>Indian generals would support this move for various reasons. Indigenous ordnance projects for manufacturing tanks and aircrafts have been unsuccessful causing the armed forces to rely heavily on antiquated Russian artillery and weapons. As a rising Asian power, India has to compete with neighboring powers for a share in the global market and at the same time guard itself from hostile forces. Its economy has been prospering and with a strong democratic setup, India can afford to boost its defense capabilities.</p> <p><a href="http://tacstrat.com/content/index.php/2012/11/30/ready-steady-go-re-visiting-the-indo-pak-arms-race/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><strong>Read more...</strong></a></p> http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/245482.html pakistan china india public 0 http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/245059.html Tue, 27 Nov 2012 10:16:55 GMT Tacstrat: Getting Waziristan Right http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/245059.html <p><a href="http://tacstrat.com/content/index.php/2012/11/27/getting-waziristan-right/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><strong>Tacstrat Analysis</strong></a></p> <p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"><img src="file:///D|/ZoundryRaven/resourcestore/zrclip_001p3a29d4d8.png" style="WIDTH: 314px; HEIGHT: 219px" height="250" width="462" /></p> <p>North Waziristan figures prominently on the entire terrorism scene. Every terrorist or would be terrorist arrested indicates some kind of direct or indirect link to North Waziristan making it a point of convergence for anyone contemplating a terrorist act. All reports confirm the presence of Afghan Taliban personified by the Haqqani Network, the 'Pakistan Taliban- Tehrik Taliban Pakistan and an assortment of Chechens, Uzbeks, Turkmen, Arabs and even Western origin people in North Waziristan together with kidnappers, drugs and weapon smugglers and criminals from Pakistan who go there to rest and recuperate after their latest venture and before the next one. The outreach from this area into the urban centers of Pakistan links it to various extremist militant outfits that are ready to do whatever is required for a price and with the added benefit of furthering their own ethnic, sectarian, political or resource gathering agendas. It goes without saying that there may be, and probably is, external exploitation of this complex situation. This cauldron of criminal, subversive, insurgent and militant activity is the single most important reason for Pakistan's image worldwide as the epicenter of terrorism and for the economic decline fuelled by a destabilized internal security situation. The combined threat that this situation poses now threatens Pakistan's existence as a state.</p> <p><a href="http://tacstrat.com/content/index.php/2012/11/27/getting-waziristan-right/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><strong>Read more...</strong></a></p> http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/245059.html terrorism swat afghan taliban north waziristan baluchistan war on terror taliban pakistan criminals al qaeda arabs pakistan military extremists fata pakistan taliban public 0 http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/244806.html Mon, 19 Nov 2012 09:55:22 GMT Kashmir- the violence never abated http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/244806.html <p><em>By Sajjad Shaukat <br /></em><strong><a href="http://www.zoneasia-pk.com/ZoneAsia-Pk/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=9551:atrocities-in-kashmir&amp;catid=35:internationalpolitics&amp;Itemid=60" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Tacstrat</a></strong></p> <p><img src="file:///D|/ZoundryRaven/resourcestore/zrclip_003n561c3880.png" style="WIDTH: 371px; HEIGHT: 218px" height="436" width="640" /></p> <p>In the modern era, various forms of state terrorism continue by the Israeli armed forces on the Palestinians. While with the backing of Burmese military regime and the covert assistance of Hindus, recent bloodshed of the minority Rohingya Muslim community at the hands of the Rakhine extremist Buddhists in Burma (Myanmar) presents another such example. Similarly, during the Bosnian War (19921995), Serb forces slaughtered more than 10,000 Muslims in Bosnia and Herzegovina and buried them in the unamed mass graves. That genocide was repeated in Kosovo where several men and women were murdered.</p> <p>While, these atrocities are still fresh in the minds of every Muslim, but with the official backing of the government, massacre and harassment of Muslims by the Indian military including paramilitary troops in the Indian-held Kashmir has become a permanent feature.</p> <p>In this regard, instead of granting the people their genuine right of self-determination and holding plebiscite in the controlled territories of Kashmir in accordance with the UN resolutions, various sorts of state terrorism have become part of a deliberate campaign by the Indian army against Muslim Kashmiris, especially since 1989. It has manifested in brutal tactics such as crackdowns, curfews, illegal detentions, massacre, targeted killings, sieges, burning the houses, torture, disappearances, rape, breaking the legs, molestation of Muslim women and killing of persons through fake encounter.</p> <p>In this respect, in its report released on October 13, 2012 about detentions under the Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act (PSA) 1978, Amnesty International disclosed under the title, PSA Still a Lawless Law that despite pressure on Indian government, the PSA has not been reviewed and amended. Therefore, new records are being made by Indian law-enforcing agencies and security forces in human rights violations in the Indian occupied Kashmir.</p> <p>In its previous report, Amnesty International has pointed out: The Indian governments disregard for human rights in Jammu and Kashmir means that in practice people reportedly died in custody and that the whereabouts of the disappeared persons continue to be unknowngovernment forces continue to commit serious violations of humanitarian lawthe Muslim majority population in the Kashmir Valley suffers from the repressive tactics of the security forces. Under the Jammu and Kashmir Disturbed Areas Act, and the Armed Forces (Jammu and Kashmir) Special Powers Act and Public Safety Act, security forces personnel have extraordinary powers to shoot suspected lawbreakers, and to destroy structures suspected of harboring militants or arms.</p> <p>Notably, after visiting more than 50 villages, similarly Citizens Council of Justice (CCJ) published a report in Srinager in September, 2012 on human rights violations in the Indian controlled Kashmir. On the basis of its survey, research and analysis, the CCJ report under the caption, Atrocity and Suffering revealed that a total of 502 people were either murdered or enforcedly disappeared, 2048 individuals were physically tortured, 6888 were subjected to forced labour and 40 people were killed in custody by Indian Security Forces. 234 Mosques and 700 civilian properties worth 103.8 crores were destroyed in the garb of anti-Mujahideen operations, while after being released from jails freedom fighters, faced different detention periods.</p> <p>But it was a limited survey, as All Parties Hurriyet Conference Azad Jammu and Kashmir disclosed that from 1989 to 15 October 2012, there have been deaths of 93,274 innocent Kashmiris, 6,969 custodial killings, 117,345 arrests and destruction of 105,861 houses. Indian brutal security forces have orphaned over 107, 351 children, widowed 22,728 women and gang raped 9,920 women in the Indian held Kashmir.</p> <p>Over the two decades of violence in Jammu and Kashmir, Human Rights Watch has documented several failures to ensure protection of human rights. It has called for the repeal of those laws which provide the armed forces with extraordinary powers to search, detain, and use lethal force, leading to numerous human rights violations. They also provide immunity for security forcestheir prosecutions, even where the facts are well established, are rare.</p> <p>In the recent past, Kashmir Quarterly also reported, Indian Forces killed a number of citizens, torched mosques, shops and houses in various parts of the valley. As a result, there were protest demonstrations in many cities. Troops desecrated the central Srinagar mosque and tortured worshippers whom they found inside.</p> <p>It is of particular attention that in 2008, a rights group reported unmarked graves in 55 villages across the northern regions of Baramulla, Bandipore and Handwara. Then researchers and other groups reported finding thousands of single and mass graves without markers. In this context, in the last few years, rights groups discovered nearly 3,000 unnamed graves in the various districts of Kashmir.</p> <p>It is mentionable that in August, 2011, Indian Jammu and Kashmir State Human Rights Commission (SHRC) officially acknowledged in its report that innocent civilians killed in the two-decade conflict have been buried in unmarked graves. The report indicated 2,156 unidentified bodies which were found in mass graves in various regions of the Indian-held Kashmir. Notably, foreign sources and human rights organisations have disclosed that unnamed graves include those innocent persons, killed by the Indian military and paramilitary troops in the fake encounters including those who were tortured to death by the Indian secret agency RAW.</p> <p>Recently, Chinas leading News Agency Xinhua has unearthed more gruesome details on world-stunning unmarked graves in Poonch of the Indian occupied Kashmir. It pointed out the statement of Sofi Aziz Joo, caretaker of a graveyard as saying, Police and Army used to bring those bodies and direct me to bury them. The bodies were usually bullet-ridden, mutilated, faces disfigured and sometimes without limbs and heads.</p> <p>While, Association of Parents of Disappeared Persons (APDP) and rights groups have stated that more than 10,000 people have disappeared, accusing government forces of staging fake gun battles to cover up killings. They also revealed that suspected persons had been arrested and were murdered through arbitrary executions, and then buried in unmarked graves.</p> <p>Besides, on June 28, 2010, BBC reported, three men went missing in Indian-administered Kashmir in Aprilbut their bodies were discovered near the Line of Controla senior officer of the Indian army had kidnapped them by offering them jobs as porters. The troops later informed the police that they had killed three militants. Kashmirs law minister, Ali Mohammad Sagar says there have been several proven cases of fake encounters in the past 20 years.</p> <p>BBC explained, There are hardliners in the Indian Army and intelligence agencies, who think that by raising the bogey of infiltration and gun battles near the border they can create terror among people and also put pressure on Pakistan.</p> <p>It seems that non-condemnation of Indian massive human rights violations and non-interference for the seettlement of this issue by the so-called civilized international community, especially the US have further encouraged New Delhi to keep on going with its atrocities on the armless Kashmiri masses. Ignorence of the dipute by them involves the risk of nuclear war between Pakistan and India.</p> <p>Indian authorities are not willing to talk with Kashmiri people on political grounds. New Delhi has reached a conclusion that only bullet is the right way of dealing with them. Surprisingly, Indian successive governments are trying to ignore the dynamics of the freedom movement of Kashmiris to maintain their alien rule.</p> <p>However, despite the employment of various forms of massacre and harassment in the Indian occupied Kashmir, the war of liberation by the Kashmiri people will continue until they get their legitimate right of self-determination. If New Delhi could not suppress the movement in the past, it could also not do so in present and future.</p> <p><em>Sajjad Shaukat writes on international affairs and is author of the book: US vs Islamic Militants, Invisible Balance of Power: Dangerous Shift in International Relations.</em></p> http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/244806.html palestinians kashmir muslims china pakistan hindus jammu srinagar india public 0 http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/244510.html Fri, 16 Nov 2012 06:37:01 GMT Balkanization of USA? http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/244510.html <p><em>By Amanda Holpuch <br /></em> <strong><a href="http://www.zoneasia-pk.com/ZoneAsia-Pk/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=9537:balkanization-of-usa&amp;catid=35:internationalpolitics&amp;Itemid=60" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">ZoneAsia-Pk</a></strong></p> <p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"><img src="file:///D|/ZoundryRaven/resourcestore/zrclip_002n33fc9158.png" style="WIDTH: 283px; HEIGHT: 168px" height="276" width="460" /></p> <p>Texas Nationalists say secession is possible as 77,000 sign petition, despite governor Rick Perry backing the union.</p> <p>Less than a week after Barack Obama was re-elected president, a slew of petitions have appeared on the White House's We the People site, asking for states to be granted the right to peacefully withdraw from the union.</p> <p>On Tuesday, all but one of the 33 states listed were far from reaching the 25,000 signature mark needed to get a response from the White House. Texas, however, had gained more than 77,000 online signatures in three days.</p> <p>People from other states had signed the Texas petition. Another petition on the website was titled: "Deport everyone that signed a petition to withdraw their state from the United States of America." It had 3,536 signatures.</p> <p><strong><a style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51); TEXT-DECORATION: underline" href="https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/peacefully-grant-state-texas-withdraw-united-states-america-and-create-its-own-new-government/BmdWCP8B" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">The Texas petition</a> reads:</strong></p> <p><em>Given that the state of Texas maintains a balanced budget and is the 15th largest economy in the world, it is practically feasible for Texas to withdraw from the union, and to do so would protect it's citizens' standard of living and re-secure their rights and liberties in accordance with the original ideas and beliefs of our founding fathers which are no longer being reflected by the federal government.</em></p> <p>Activists across the country have advocated for independent statehood since the union was restored after the end of the Civil War in 1865. Texas has been host to some of the most fervent fights for independence.</p> <p>Daniel Miller is the president of the Texas Nationalist Movement, which supports Texan independence and has its own online petition.</p> <p>"We want to be able to govern ourselves without having some government a thousand-plus miles away that we have to go ask 'mother may I' to," Miller said. "We want to protect our political, our cultural and our economic identities."</p> <p>Miller is not a fan of the word "secession", because he views it as an over-generalization of what his group hopes to accomplish, but he encourages advocates for Texan independence to show their support when they can, including by signing the White House website petition.</p> <p>"Given the political, cultural and economic pressures the United States is under, it's not beyond the pale where one could envision the break up of the United States," he said. "I don't look at it as possibility, I look at it as an inevitability."</p> <p>Miller has been working for Texas independence for 16 years. He pointed to last week's federal elections as evidence that a state independence movement is gaining traction. Miller pointed to the legalization of the sale of marijuana in Colorado and Washington, disobeying federal mandate.</p> <p>Akhil Reed Amar, Sterling professor of law at Yale, said that extreme circumstances would be necessary for a state to be able to secede from the US.</p> <p>"The simple answer is create a time machine and rewrite the constitution or win the Civil War," Amar said.</p> <p>He went on to explain that secession could be achieved legally, with a constitutional amendment, federal statute or treaty - all of which would need majority support from the rest of the country.</p> <p>"The big point is it can't occur unilaterally, it would have to be a decision of the whole United States, rather than a part," Amar said.</p> <p>Amar believes that people who favor independence would be better off leaving the country on their own.</p> <p>"If they really want to do it, individuals are allowed to self-deport, and I'm not talking about so-called illegal aliens, I'm talking about people who signed the petition," said Amar. "They can secede - it's called immigration - but they can't take the land or the water with them because these are the common inheritance of all Americans."</p> <p><strong>Amar quoted a line from one of Abraham Lincoln's <a style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51); TEXT-DECORATION: underline" href="http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/index.asp?document=1065" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">annual messages to Congress</a>:</strong></p> <p><em>These outlets, east, west, and south, are indispensable to the well being of the people inhabiting and to inhabit this vast interior region. Which of the three may be the best is no proper question. All are better than either, and all of right belong to that people and to their successors forever. True to themselves, they will not ask where a line of separation shall be, but will vow rather that there shall be no such line.</em></p> <p>A spokeswoman for the governor of Texas, Rick Perry - who in 2009 appeared to suggest that Texas had a right to secede from the union - said the governor was opposed to such a move.</p> <p>In a statement to the Dallas Morning News, Catherine Frazier, Perry's press secretary, said: "Governor Perry believes in the greatness of our union and nothing should be done to change it. But he also shares the frustrations many Americans have with our federal government.</p> <p>"Now more than ever our country needs strong leadership from states like Texas, that are making tough decisions to live within their means, keep taxes low and provide opportunities to job creators so their citizens can provide for their families and prosper."</p> http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/244510.html barack obama public 1 http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/244464.html Fri, 16 Nov 2012 05:41:54 GMT Defeating disabilities http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/244464.html <p><strong><a href="http://forpakistan.org/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">For Pakistan</a></strong></p> <p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"><img src="file:///D|/ZoundryRaven/resourcestore/zrclip_001p5258a6d8.png" style="WIDTH: 158px; HEIGHT: 191px" height="230" width="192" /></p> <p>A staggered gait. A protruding limb. A twisted gaze. A crooked smile.</p> <p>Do these features make you uncomfortable? Make you feel the need to look for alternative topics of discussion? Then you are one of the thousands Pakistanis who treat people with special needs with a discriminatory attitude.</p> <p>Disabled people are mostly treated with pity or contempt. In the first case, the sympathy, even if well intended, only makes the disabled more conscious of his/her disability. Disabled people have frequently expressed their anger about how their disability is used to define their character and personality. Non-disabled people are likely to believe the disabled to be oppressed, lonely and disadvantaged. In reality there are people like <a style="BORDER-BOTTOM: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; MARGIN: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); VERTICAL-ALIGN: baseline; BORDER-TOP: 0px; BORDER-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-TOP: 0px" href="http://tribune.com.pk/story/377034/like-herself-abia-aims-to-empower-women-with-disabilities/" rel="nofollow">Abia</a> who are great leaders striving for a better world.</p> <p><a href="http://forpakistan.org/fpdata/defeating-disabilities/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><strong>Read more...</strong></a></p> http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/244464.html pakistanis public 0 http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/244142.html Thu, 15 Nov 2012 07:53:20 GMT China unveils attack helicopter at airshow: report http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/244142.html <p><a href="http://spearheadresearch.org/SR_CMS/index.php/internationalaffairssecuirty/china-unveils-attack-helicopter-at-airshow-report" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><strong>Spearhead Research</strong></a></p> <p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"><img src="file:///D|/ZoundryRaven/resourcestore/zrclip_001n28b4b152.png" height="200" width="268" /></p> <p>China has unveiled a new attack helicopter as it seeks to rival similar aircraft made by the United States and Russia, state media said.</p> <p>A unit of China Aviation Industry Corporation (AVIC) showed off the WZ-10, or "Thunder Fire", for the first time in public at the country's premier airshow in the southern city of Zhuhai, the China Daily newspaper said.</p> <p>China is displaying a range of military hardware, including a new drone and a model of a next-generation fighter plane at the show, as it builds up its own defence capabilities and seeks customers for its products.</p> <p>More than 30 foreign military delegations are attending the airshow, the official Xinhua news agency said.</p> <p>The attack helicopter, designed primarily for anti-tank missions, aims to challenge the AH-64 Apache of the United States and Russia's Mil Mi-28, China Daily quoted Chinese experts as saying.</p> <p>AVIC also showed off another helicopter at the event - the WZ-19, or Black Tornado, which is designed for armed reconnaissance and the support of ground troops, the newspaper said.</p> <p>State television showed the black attack helicopter on a vertical climb during a demonstration.</p> <p>"The WZ-10 is one of the top three attack helicopters in the world," China Daily quoted chief designer Wu Ximing as saying.</p> <p>An unnamed Chinese expert was quoted as saying China's attack helicopter is more manoeuvrable at low altitudes than the Apache, but lacks its thrust and firepower.</p> <p>The AH-64 Apache - made by Boeing Defense, Space and Security - is used by the US Army and several other countries.</p> <p>The Apache is powered by two turboshaft engines and carries laser-guided precision missiles, 70mm rockets and 30mm automatic cannon, according to the website of the Boeing unit.</p> <p>China's development of the WZ-10 dates back to the 1990s, when military planners observed the use of helicopters by the United States during the first Gulf War with Iraq, the China Daily said.</p> <p>Chinese President Hu Jintao last week called for China to step up the military's technological abilities, saying its most important task was to be able to "win a local war in an information age".</p> <p>In late September it put its first aircraft carrier, a refurbished Soviet vessel named the Liaoning, into service - its first step towards a fleet of carriers expected to be built domestically in coming years.</p> <p>Hu's call came amid tensions with several Asian neighbours over maritime territorial claims, including Japan, the Philippines and Vietnam, as well as the US "pivot" towards Asia.</p> http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/244142.html public 0 http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/243925.html Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:37:56 GMT US 2012: It does matter if its Black or White http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/243925.html <p><a href="http://www.zoneasia-pk.com/ZoneAsia-Pk/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=9468:us-2012-it-does-matter-if-its-black-or-white&amp;catid=70:free-talk&amp;Itemid=84" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">ZoneAsia-Pk</a></p> <p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"><img src="file:///D|/ZoundryRaven/resourcestore/zrclip_001n2197eb98.png" height="211" width="330" /></p> <p>Waking up to Obama's projected victory after he had crossed the 270 electoral vote mark was a relief. No. Actually it gave me that adrenaline rush I needed to get my day started. 6 billion dollars have been spent in the past 4 years on both the candidates' campaigns combined. And we land pretty much where we started. While back home many insist American Presidential election remains irrelevant, I beg to differ.</p> <p>Both candidates might primarily only disagree on domestic policy issues. Recently, given my obsession with online quizzes and politics, the perfect treat was <a style="COLOR: rgb(51,51,51); TEXT-DECORATION: underline" href="http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/interactive/2012/10/20121015134525993838.html?utm_content=automate&amp;utm_campaign=Trial6&amp;utm_source=NewSocialFlow&amp;utm_term=plustweets&amp;utm_medium=MasterAccount" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">this interactive on Aljazeera</a> (one of my all time favorite news sources by the way) which had a list of hypothetical situations with 'agree' to 'disagree' bars for each. The surprising thing was that my level of favorability increased or decreased (to different extents though) for each candidate on the foreign policy concerns. But by the end of it Obama suited my preferences more (sure I did not answer the domestic policy concerns). Even that however is not the point.</p> <p><strong></p> <p><strong><strong>Read more...</strong></strong></p></strong> http://gregmathews.livejournal.com/243925.html pak-us relations national security public 0