DLC or Sequel

#1Abe828Posted 2/10/2013 12:06:32 PM
If you had to choose between the studio focusing on one, which would you pick?
#2ArethaiPosted 2/10/2013 12:08:00 PM
I'd just fix the whole thing (sequel) rather than adding more to imperfection.
#3RainbowsaurusPosted 2/10/2013 12:08:25 PM
DLC. The game is still pretty new, there's no need to rush a sequel. Besides, I'd like to see a sequel on the PS4.
#4DHG_SweepPosted 2/10/2013 12:09:16 PM
Sequel. Because it means that there would be a sequel and they could fix the problems and work on a better roster.
Anderson Silva > Fedor. People who agree: 1
#5AssassinHawkinsPosted 2/10/2013 12:12:55 PM
If it was guarantee? Sequel.
PSN: AssassinHawkins
#6Bahamut_ShinPosted 2/10/2013 12:15:34 PM
Sequel, it will be easier that way anyway
this guy don't speak english!!
#7LightEcoSagePosted 2/10/2013 1:02:32 PM(edited)
This is actually a very hard choice. If you truly think about both ways before just going with what you think is the best you will actually realize both can be equally great choices...

However I will go with a sequel so there can be more options to add to the overall next game(hypothetically of course). The way im looking at it makes more sense for a sequel to be made. See, somethings that need improving can't be, because some aspects are already set and permanent in this game.
#8RagnoraokPosted 2/10/2013 12:37:24 PM
the game is broken goods. The major issues cannot be fixed or patched in. More importantly, the gaming community has already showed their lacked of interest in this game. Not even a sequel.....a reboot. There needs to be a completely new Sony SSB.
Here at gamefaqs, you are either a troll, noob, or fanboy.....choose wisely.
#9iori_iezziPosted 2/10/2013 12:57:14 PM
#10ImDyinSquirtlePosted 2/10/2013 1:00:56 PM