Take the 2-minute tour ×

Not every orientable 3-manifold is a double cover of $S^3$ branched over a link. For example, the 3-torus isn't. However, in 1975 Montesinos conjectured (Surjery on links and double branched covers of $S^3$, in: "Knots, groups and 3-manifolds", papers dedicated to the memory of R. Fox) that every orientable 3-manifold is a double branched cover of a sphere with handles i.e. the connected sum of a certain number of copies of $S^1\times S^2$ (this number can be zero, in which case we get $S^3$). Notice that this time $T^3$ does not provide a counter-example since if we take the quotient of $T^3$ by the involution $(x,y,z)\mapsto (x^{-1}, y^{-1},z)$ we get $S^2\times S^1$.

I was wondering what the status of this conjecture is.

share|improve this question

2 Answers 2

up vote 8 down vote accepted

It is false. For example, there are closed, orientable, aspherical 3-manifolds that admit no nontrivial action of a finite group whatsoever. The first examples were due to F. Raymond and J. Tollefson in the 1970s, I believe.

share|improve this answer
Thanks, Allan! I've found their papers. –  algori Dec 21 '09 at 2:29

I don't understand the answer. Why a manfold without nontrivial action cannot a branch cover of $S^1\timesS^2$? Compare it with that every 3-manfold is a 3-fold branch cover of $S^3$.

share|improve this answer
It's because the question asks for a 2-fold cover, which would have to be regular. –  Richard Kent May 11 '10 at 14:59
I see. Thank you. –  Wolffo May 11 '10 at 15:09
Then is the conjecture true when restricting the condition on manifold with $\mathbbZ$ action? –  Wolffo May 11 '10 at 15:41

Your Answer


