Hi, At ACNA I mentioned to Shane that the company that I work for was interested in re-distributing OO but was concerned over the legalities of doing so - specifically regarding trademark use. After explaining the company and project in detail he said that he thought it could work out, and directed me to poll the podling as a prerequisite for getting trademark approval from the ASF. Although that project (at work) was frozen by the time I returned from Vancouver, it's come up in discussion again, so I'd like to ask the podling for permission to use the trademarks and guidance on how to best keep the podling's interests in mind. The company focuses on monetized installers, similar to those found in Oracle's JAVA windows installer or on CNET downloads (which is actually our product), where we offer an opt-in bundled software download as part of the installer. Currently, our team has come up with mockups for the installer and landing page for the download, which I'd be happy to provide in the form of attachments on-list, or off-list (or on a wiki if that's the "right way to do it"). What we want to know, specifically is: 1) How to brand the product? Given we're talking about 3.3.0 (at least until 3.4.0 happens), we thought to simply brand it OpenOffice.org Should we continue that line, or use Apache OpenOffice? If the latter, should we include "Incubating" and the logos set out at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOOLogo+proposal or not? 2) We'd like pointers on the right place (if any) to include (TM) or (R) or anything else both on the landing page and on the installer. 3) Other general pointers that you have. Thanks, Issac