


Rate This
  • Comments 25

The Equals method is just a virtual one defined in System.Object, and overridden by whichever classes choose to do so. The == operator is an operator which can be overloaded by classes, but which usually has identity behaviour.

For reference types where == has not been overloaded, it compares whether two references refer to the same object - which is exactly what the implementation of Equals does in System.Object.

Value types do not provide an overload for == by default. However, most of the value types provided by the framework provide their own overload. The default implementation of Equals for a value type is provided by ValueType, and uses reflection to make the comparison, which makes it significantly slower than a type-specific implementation normally would be. This implementation also calls Equals on pairs of references within the two values being compared.

However, the main difference between the two types of comparison in normal use (where you're unlikely to be defining your own value types very often) is polymorphism. Operators are overloaded, not overridden, which means that unless the compiler knows to call the more specific version, it'll just call the identity version. To illustrate that, here's an example:

using System;

public class Test
	static void Main()
        // Create two equal but distinct strings
        Console.WriteLine (a==b);
        Console.WriteLine (a.Equals(b));
        // Now let's see what happens with the same tests but
        // with variables of type object
        object c = a;
        object d = b;
        Console.WriteLine (c==d);
        Console.WriteLine (c.Equals(d));

The results are:



So, when should you use which operator? My rule of thumb is that for almost all reference types, use Equals when you want to test equality rather than reference identity. The exception is for strings - comparing strings with == does make things an awful lot simpler and more readable but you need to remember that both sides of the operator must be expressions of type string in order to get the comparison to work properly.

For value types, I'd normally use == for easier-to-read code. Things would get tricky if a value type provided an overload for == which acted differently to Equals, but I'd consider such a type very badly designed to start with.

[Author: Jon Skeet]

Leave a Comment
  • Please add 6 and 4 and type the answer here:
  • Post
Page 1 of 2 (25 items) 12