Take the 2-minute tour ×

Is there a consistent rule to create reflexive verbs?

When utilizing reflexive verbs are all verbs able to become reflexive verbs by adding, se at the end of the infinitive verb?

I.E.: "lavarse", "tomarse", "rascarse"

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Yes, and it's the rule you wrote yourself, adding se to the infinitive.
As all infinitives end in -ar, -er or -ir, adding se is totally regular and consistent.

At least grammatically, because there may be some verbs that are semantically unable to become reflexive, I.E. it wouldn't make any sense that the subject and the object be the same, although I'm not sure and can't name any right now.

As @Eduardo suggests, the verbs nacer and parir can't by logic be reflexive.
Another examples are llover, haber (when not acting as an auxiliary verb*) this two verbs don't have a subject (nobody rains) so they can't be reflexive.

* haber means there is in this case. When acting as an auxiliary as in haber ido (have gone) can be reflexive, but that's a different case.

share|improve this answer
Nacer por ejemplo. Uno puede nacer pero no nacerse. –  Eduardo Jan 3 '12 at 2:53
Parir sería otra excepción. –  Eduardo Jan 3 '12 at 3:16
@Eduardo, you're right, those verbs can't be reflexive following real life logic, but what if one were writing fantastic literature or telling a dream? –  Petruza Jan 3 '12 at 13:48
add comment

Your Answer


