Tag Archives: germany

Bluehand & Ban Sharia



Secret Society War VI, Hacking Sony.


I am going to start this blog by going on a little tangent.  Many of you might not know but Willy Nelson, much like Al Sharpton didn’t pay his taxes for years.  And Al Sharpton much like Willy Nelson had to come out of retirement to pay off the IRS.  Al Sharpton has been the oval office 83 times since the Obama Administration took office, he is essentially the President’s official spoke’s person.  Which means that what he is doing right now, and what he has been doing for the past 6 years is at the direct behest of Obama.


There is a strong correlation between Psychopathy and tyranny.  Tyranny has been referred to as aggressive narcissism.  Psychopaths don’t reform, they just become more manipulative, which is to say they have a modus operandi, a form of conquest that they continue using over and over, and they can’t stop because their sense of self is tied up in the modus operandi.  Case in point.  Data has been found missing from computers of senators computers so that they couldn’t bring certain cases before certain people, this is known as data assassination.  https://discussions.apple.com/thread/1340543?tstart=0

In case you have forgotten German Chancellor Merkel accused Obama openly of spying on her computer, the Obama Administration never specifically denied, the charge, they minced words saying that the U.S. “is not and will not.” spy on computers, somehow missing the past tense “was”.


Ms. Merkel, who last fall declared that “spying between friends is simply unacceptable” and that the United States had opened a breach of trust that would have to be repaired, said at the news conference that “we have a few difficulties yet to overcome.” One remaining issue, she said, was the “proportionality” of the surveillance.  http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/03/world/europe/merkel-says-gaps-with-us-over-surveillance-remain.html?_r=0


The moment I heard the claim I thought it was preposterous.  Not because it isn’t possible or plausible but because it wasn’t practical.  The information that they gleaned didn’t particularly hurt Sony or the United States it leveraged  Obama’s race bating strategy or what Bill Clinton referred to recently as identity based politics.  Why were they looking at the information that they were looking at? Ask yourself, who is the dictator that is getting offended at mildly racist jokes told about the president in private?

“The caution especially applies to the terror threat; the language in the terror message does not sound in sync with the standard propaganda language or aggressive rhetoric that the regime usually employs. ” http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/up-front/posts/2014/12/19-north-korea-sony-cyber-attack-moon

Even Korea says it wasn’t the source of the attack and is willing to work with the United States to discover who the real culprit is.



Now many of you might know about the large amount of research that I have done on psychopathology, in my psychological models.  One of the strategies of Psychopaths is to appear to be being victimized while they are victimizing.  This means that they can’t appear to be the first cause, they have to appear to be the second cause, the victim and the cause of the good.

Now let’s examine what Obama’s spokesperson and personal cheerleader said immediately after the Sony leak, as though he was prepared and being scripted.

“So the jury is still out on where we go with Amy,” Sharpton said. “We clearly are willing to deal with an immediate formula to see where we deal with breaking down the walls of inflexible and so far immovable racial exclusion in Hollywood.”

“We have agreed to having a working group deal with the racial bias and lack of diversity in Hollywood,” http://nypost.com/2014/12/18/sharpton-to-have-say-over-how-sony-makes-movies/


If you observe what I refer to as the direction of the conversation, the argument made by Al Sharpton was that the rhetoric and ideology coming out of Hollywood is not congruent with the experience of people in the black Ghettos, the ones that want’ cops to die right now.  Hollywood doesn’t portray cop killing hood rats as positively as Al Sharpton would like them to be portrayed.  He is essentially making an argument of a prima fasciae law case for proving disparate impact and benchmarking the affirmative action and vexatious litigations of lawyers to get women and minorities into positions of authority based on their sex and skin color not based on their success or results.  Hmmm, does that sound like the strategy of a person who was a lawyer but never a judge? (Barak Obama)  A person using identity based politics to force his agenda?

The argument tacitly suggests that the plight of the black people in the ghettos, whom Al Sharpton and Barak Obama have been bating, is because of the Evil Propaganda machine of Hollywood that is maligning the reputations of these soulful and earthy people that want’ to loot small businesses and assassinate the police.  They are arguing that these same people should essentially be given a portion of Hollywood cinema to make their own propaganda and show things from their own perspective, that perspective being stupid and violent.  It can’t be that that perspective failed of it’s own lack of merit, it has to be a conspiracy.



The thing that should concern everybody is that this was a private conversation.  Affirmative action has now passed into the realm of thought crime.  It isn’t bad enough that we no longer have freedom of speech as we have been forced into female communication rituals in the form of political correctness.  I can’t be proud of my culture and allow anybody else to be proud of their cultures.  We can’t talk openly and honestly about what we dislike about other people our opinions are scripted and we are bad people if we hold certain positions or have certain ideas.  The people who are allowed to be proud of and at the same time defensive of their cultures are people that have no reason to be proud of their cultures.

He said: ‘After the Obama joke, no one was going to get on the side of Amy, [Amy Pascal, Sony Pictures co-chair] and so suddenly, everyone ran for the hills. Look, I can’t make an excuse for that joke, it is what it is, a terrible mistake. Having said that, it was used as a weapon of fear, not only for everyone to disassociate themselves from Amy but also to feel the fear themselves. They know what they themselves have written in their emails, and they’re afraid.’

Clooney said he approached a large number of important people to sign his petition but kept getting rebuffed. He said that people are afraid of potential retribution.

‘This is just where we are right now, how scared this industry has been made,’ he told the magazine.



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2885794/Film-studio-heads-say-never-saw-George-Clooney-s-petition-supporting-embattled-Sony-star-publicly-berated-refusing-sign.html#ixzz3N29mX1OS

“This is not just an attack on Sony,” Clooney wrote. “It involves every studio, every network, every business and every individual in this country.”


thoughtcrime is an occurrence or instance of controversial or socially unacceptable thoughts. The term is also used to describe some theological concepts such as disbelief or idolatry,[1] or a rejection of strong social or philosophical principles.[2]

The term was popularized in the dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell, wherein thoughtcrime is the criminal act of holding unspoken beliefs or doubts that oppose or question the ruling party. In the book, the government attempts to control not only the speech and actions, but also the thoughts of its subjects. To entertain unacceptable thoughts is known as crimethink in Newspeak, the ideologically purified dialect of the party.[3]  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thoughtcrime


The Obama Administration and I believe Obama himself referred to this as an act of Cyber terrorism and immediately the next day, the rhetoric was being scaled down to Internet Vandalism.  Let me explain why, since corporations are now people, if this turns out to be the United States that did this under the auspices of Obamas dictate, what this means is that this is an attack on an American Citizen by the American Military, which is an act of tyranny.  Since ancient Greece, the leader of a Democratic people cannot use the military on their own people without being considered a Tyrant.

And Anonymous recently said that and I quote, “we all know the hacks didn’t come from North Korea,”.

Who Really was Jesus? Rabbi Ba’al Shiva


Muslims claim that Jesus was a Muslim even though he drank wine.  Also the quran tells Muslims not to take Jews or Christians as friends and to crucify Christians.  My views on the Christ are not conventional by any stretch of the imagination.  An acquaintance of mine made a documentary on the Lord known as the the Caesar’s Messiah.



His premise is that Jesus didn’t actually exist and that he was actually a literary coup benchmarking the Jewish typology.  If that was the case it was the most brilliant mass manipulation since Moses.  But I have a slightly different perspective.  Many people point to the fact that Josephus didn’t mention Jesus and that any reference to him was a spurious retro insertion.  But many overlook the fact that Josephus was a Samaritan and Jesus was overtly biased against Samaritans.  Observe:

Josephan scholarship in the 19th and early 20th century became focused on Josephus’ relationship to the sect of thePharisees[citation needed]. It consistently portrayed him as a member of the sect, and as a traitor to the Jewish nation—a view which became known as the classical concept of Josephus.[20]  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephus#Josephus_scholarship

In response Vespasian decided to keep Josephus as a hostage and interpreter. After Vespasian did become Emperor in 69, he granted Josephus his freedom, at which time Josephus assumed the emperor’s family name of Flavius.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephus#Josephus_scholarship

Josephus was a Pharisee and the Pharisees were Samaritans.  Jesus debated them relentlessly calling them offspring of vipers.

“These twelve Jesus sent out with the following instructions: “Do not go among the Gentiles or enter any town of the Samaritans.”  Matt 10:5

But what of the account of the Good Samaritan?  Well, the disciples knew very well how Jesus felt about Samaritans, so when they asked him “Who is my brother?”  because Jesus was trying to teach them a philosophical brother hood, a philoish.

Philia (/ˈfɪljə/ or /ˈfɪliə/; Ancient Greek: φιλία), often translated “brotherly love“, is one of the four ancient Greek words for love: philia, storge, agape and eros.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philia

The Good Samaritan was the exception to the rule, not the rule, the exception proves the rule BECAUSE it is an exception.  If a Samaritan acted like that he would be your brother, notice that in the parable Jesus also uses a Pharisee as an example of what a person who is not your brother would do.  The adherents to the law code of Abraham, not that of Moses and not that of Jesus.



Lucifer (/ˈlsɪfər/ or /ˈljsɪfər/) is the King James Version rendering of the Hebrew word הֵילֵל in Isaiah14:12.[1] This word, transliterated hêlêl[1] or heylel,[2] occurs only once in the Hebrew Bible[1] and according to the KJV-influenced Strong’s Concordance means “shining one, morning star, Lucifer”.[2] The word Lucifer is taken from the LatinVulgate,[3] which translates הֵילֵל as lucifer,[Isa 14:12][4][5] meaning “the morning star, the planetVenus“, or, as an adjective, “light-bringing”.[6] TheSeptuagint renders הֵילֵל in Greek as ἑωσφόρος[7][8][9][10][11] (heōsphoros),[12][13][14] a name, literally “bringer of dawn”, for the morning star.[15]  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucifer

Jesus was claiming to be lucifer.  Not only that, behold:

5Or haven’t you read in the Law that the priests on Sabbath duty in the temple desecrate the Sabbath and yet are innocent? 6I tell you that something greater than the temple is here. 7If you had known what these words mean, ‘I desire mercy, not sacrifice,’a you would not have condemned the innocent. 8For the Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath.”  Matt: 12

Jesus wasn’t claiming to be the lord of the sabbath so much as he was claiming to be the god of death.  Pythagorus name means I am the Python, snakes are chthonic figures, synonymous with death.  The Jews helenized and absorbed the Greek culture, Jesus, the carpenter was part of a Pythagorean math cult, he even makes reference to the “cornerstone that the rejected” to this day that is a Freemasonic reference.  The Freemasons claim their origins were Pythagorean math cults.

The word Shiva comes from the Hebrew word shiv’ah, which literally means “seven”. The tradition was developed in response to the story in Genesis 50:1-14 in which Joseph mourns the death of his father Jacob (Israel) for seven days.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shiva_(Judaism)#Etymology

The Sabbath is Saturday, Sabado, the Seventh day, lol.  Jesus was saying that he was Shiva, the god of death.


“The Son of Man came eating and drinking, and you say, ‘Here is a glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and sinners.’  http://biblehub.com/luke/7-34.htm

Can anybody think of a religion today that forbids drinking alcohol?  Muslims.  Abrahamic law covenant.  Ask yourself this question, Why did Jesus turn water into wine?  The signature miracle of the cult of Bacchus?

The Bacchanalia were Roman festivals of Bacchus, based on various ecstatic elements of the Greek Dionysia. They seem to have been popular, and well-organised, throughout the central and southern Italian peninsula. They were almost certainly associated with Rome’s native cult of Liber, and probably arrived in Rome itself around 200 BC but like all mystery religions of the ancient world, very little is known of their rites.

Image converted using ifftoany

I want you to meditate on the nature of the early initiations of secret societies, many being held in caves and the allegory of plato’s cave and what that has to do with modern media.  If you can control what people see and hear, you can control what they think and do.  Philosopher kings, Guardians, Slaves.  Which are you?  Do you think for yourself?



Matt 12

I have mentioned this before, that Jesus didn’t specifically deny that he was casting out demons by the power of Beelzebub and instead makes a reference to the temple of Solomon who built gods temple using sorcery.  But I am bringing this up again for a different reason.

n the Testament of Solomon, Beelzebul (not Beelzebub) appears as prince of the demons and says (6.2) that he was formerly a leading heavenly angel who was (6.7) associated with the star Hesperus (which is the normal Greek name for the planet Venus (Αφροδíτη) as evening star). Seemingly, Beelzebul here is simplyLucifer.   Beelzebul claims to cause destruction through tyrants, to cause demons to be worshipped among men, to excite priests to lust, to cause jealousies in cities and murders, and to bring on war.  The Testament of Solomon is a Hellenistic[disambiguation needed] Old Testament pseudepigraphical work, purportedly written by KingSolomon, in which Solomon mostly describes particular demons whom he enslaved to help build the temple, with substantial Christian interpolations.[12][13]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beelzebub

Rabbinical literature commentary equates Baal Zebub of Ekron as lord of the “fly.”The word Ba‘al Zebûb in rabbinical texts is a mockery of the Ba’al religion, which ancient Hebrews considered to be idol worship.[21]  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beelzebub#Judaism

I want you to remind yourself that Socrates exposed the “pretenders to wisdom”  and he was known as the gadfly.  He was also an initiate of the Pythagorean math cults.



This transformation or humanization of the Satyr appears throughout late Greek art. Another example of this shift occurs in the portrayal of Medusa and in that of the Amazon, characters who are traditionally depicted as barbaric and uncivilized. A very humanized Satyr is depicted in a work of Praxiteles known as the “Resting Satyr“.

Greek spirits [non-classical] known as Calicantsars have a noticeable resemblance to the ancient satyrs; they have goats’ ears and the feet of donkeys or goats or horses, are covered with hair, and love women and the dance.

Dancing satyr on a sardonyxintaglioholding a thyrsus in his left hand and akantharos in the right hand. On the right arm, the skin of a panther (pardalis). 1st century BC or beginning of 1st century.

Although they are not mentioned by Homer, in a fragment of Hesiod‘s works they are called brothers of the mountain nymphs and Kuretes, strongly connected with the cult of Dionysus. In the Dionysus cult, male followers are known as satyrs and female followers as maenads or bacchants.

I want you to contemplate this for an instant. What if in ancient Greece, on Saturday, everybody went to the theater and got drunk and acted stupid and went home and had sex, sometimes with their wives.  When the Pharisees accused Jesus of “casting out demons” what did that mean?  Atheists hear a phrase like “casting out demons” and they scoff, that is so humorous to them.  They lose interest, but, they don’t understand the perspective of the person expressing themselves in that fashion.  Something you probably didn’t know because of your obvious lack of interest in any form of religious language.

Some have offered an explanation suggesting that people once held the folk belief that a person’s soul could be thrown from their body when they sneezed,[9] that sneezing otherwise opened the body to invasion by the Devil or evil spirits,[10][11] or that sneezing was the body’s effort to force out an invading evil presence.[9] In these cases, “God bless you” or “bless you” is used as a sort of shield against evil.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_bless_you

So when the Persian/Samaritan/Pharisees accused Jesus of casting out demons by the power of beelzebub, contemplate for a moment that they might have been referring to laughter…

ISLAM prohibits sinful speech that intends to cause harm to other human beings. It also prohibits excessive laughter or extreme humor.  http://www.arabnews.com/news/454234

Laughter, fun, and joking are permissible in Islam provided guidelines from Quran and Hadith are followed. For humour to be in accordance with Islam, the joke should not insult anyone, should not frighten anyone, should be within the limits of Islamic tolerance, should tell the truth, should not be offensive, should not contain unIslamic material or promote immorality and indecency.




You Are of Your Father the Devil



Drops microphone, walks off stage…