


1811 words - 7 pages

As far back as man has been on earth, he has been driven towards building a community among his peers. Whether that is a community of hunters and gatherers who share whatever the day has brought to them within their tribe, or a larger community which within its structure lie the inner dwellings of division of labor and societal classes. Adam Smith (18th Century), John Stuart Mill (19th Century), and Karl Marx (19th Century) are of the same cloth, but in modern terms their community is referenced as a government, and they each have their own distinct opinions on the 'drive' instilled within human nature that shape their personal economic theories. I will be dissecting the views of each of these economists, in regards to the role of government within their envisioned society. While showcasing the difference in views, I want to focus on the subtle similarities that these famous economists shared within their economic process and their beliefs regarding human nature.
The first economist we will discuss is Adam Smith. Before we discuss Smith's views, we will provide a brief description of the setting in which Smith was able to create his assumptions, and formulate his theories. Smith studied Social Philosophy at the University of Glasgow and the University of Oxford, the latter of which he was not as fond of. The primary economic theory at the time (18th Century) was mercantilism, which focused on foreign trade and a positive balance of trade (Net Imports > Net Exports;Trade Surplus). Around 1760, Smith was in France, which was horribly in debt due to the ruinous aiding of Americans against the British, amongst other reasons. Smith envisioned the government playing a larger role, one which consisted of protection through merchant marines, bounties given to defense manufacturers, and a legal system, which would take into account dishonesty, violence, and fraud. In Smith's government, banking would be regulated and the government would provide public goods, such as highways, canals, lights and sewage systems. All of which would contribute to the public hygiene and overall maintenance of the state, and cities. It is safe to say that Adam Smith would, in today's world, be labeled as a socialist, with his heavy reliance on government funded aid and services.
An important aspect of Smith's views, were taxes. In one of Smith's many opinions regarding human nature, he explains that the rich, once placed in a position of power, maintain that power through their dealings within a civil government which employs men of inferior wealth, to protect the wealthy lands of the rich. In layman’s terms a community with the bare minimum has little violence since there is nothing to fight over, but one with plush property and wealth, has a plethora of people fighting over one another. This is where Smith's views of taxes comes into play. In his world, the government would impose taxation, with the intentions of discouraging improper or luxurious behavior...

Find Another Essay On A Comparison of the Economic Philosophies of Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill, and Karl Marx



Comparing Adam Smith and Karl Marx

562 words - 2 pages Comparing Adam Smith and Karl Marx Smith and Marx agree upon the importance of capitalism as unleashing productive powers. Capitalism is born out of the division of labour... that is, it is made possible by dividing jobs up into simple tasks as a way of increasing efficiency. By increasing efficiency, then everyone can produce more than they personally need. The extra produced can go towards the accumulation of capital, (machines, more land

Adam Smith v. Karl Marx

2229 words - 9 pages industrial prosperity while Smith believes that the incentives of a free market will allow this happen and that human nature will cause Marx’s theory to fail. In the end both men want one common goal which is the best possible economic system for society because both realize that economics is single greatest controller of the major aspects of society. Bibliography: Works Cited Page Marx, Karl. “The Communist Manifesto.” A World of Ideas. Ed. Lee Jacobus. Boston: Bedford Books, 1998. 209-32. Smith, Adam. “Of the Principle of the Commercial or Mercantile System.” A World Of Ideas. Ed. Lee Jacobus. Boston: Bedford Books, 1998. 195-205.

Adam Smith vs. Karl Marx

955 words - 4 pages Adam Smith vs. Karl Marx, living in the typical capitalist community in the United States, it is much easier to relate to the thoughts of Adam Smith. This is not to say that I do not agree with some of the precepts of pure Communism, but like the old adage says, Communism looks good on the outside.Adam Smith states his opinion on the mercantile system and its faults, while he dissected, clarified, and revolutionized the mercantilist economy and




1721 words - 7 pages Adam Smith and Karl Marx are both considered few of the most influential giants in social and economical history. When viewing their economical standpoints, it is not difficult to recognize the difference in ideas that they have regarding society. Adam Smith is an advocator for capitalism and the wealth that can be accumulated in it, while Karl Marx critiques on the flaws of capitalism and praises communism that will overthrow the capitalist

A Comparison of Marx and Engels with Mill Regarding Social and Economic Progress

5023 words - 20 pages A Comparison of Marx and Engels with Mill Regarding Social and Economic Progress To understand what these two different philosophies tell us about the nature of social and economic progress it is important to clearly establish, for the purpose of this essay, a definition of the word progress. Many philosophers see progress as being a positive, continuous advancement into the future where, if we do not gain full

The Moral Philosophy of John Stuart Mill

1124 words - 4 pages At the very heart of John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism is a concern which can be traced back to the Biblical parable of the house built on sand - an improper foundation. With this in mind, Mill audaciously sets out to develop a "foundational program" of morality, one that incorporates a principle that can be the basis for all other moral thinking. To find this foundational principle, the naturalistic Mill examines the common, fundamental beliefs

Political economy is basically a debate between Adam Smith and Karl Marx - International Relations - Essay

3468 words - 14 pages in the first instance to discuss any matter of assignment feedback and grading. It is College policy that staff will not be actively engaging in debate over matters of feedback and grades with individual students via Canvas’ online Speed Grader system. “Political economy is essentially a debate between Adam Smith and Karl Marx”. Discuss. Smith has been described as the father of political economy (and economics in general),[footnoteRef:1

The Comparison of Karl Marx and Matthew Arnold

640 words - 3 pages , there would not be enough time to devote to the enrichment of the individual's religious mind. This is caused by his strong devotion to technological advancement.The view Marx has toward religion and culture as a whole vividly portrays his feelings toward the internal aspect of culture. Marx thought the culture of a nation derived from the economic situation of the nation. His writings show he is more inclined toward the external aspect of

A Rhetorical Analysis of "On Liberty" by John Stuart Mill

1642 words - 7 pages A Rhetorical Analysis of "On Liberty"John Stuart Mill, an English philosopher and a political economist, had an important part in forming liberal thought in the 19th century. Mill published his best-known work, On Liberty, in 1859. This foundational book discusses the concept of liberty. It talks about the nature and the limits of the power performed by society over an individual. The book also deals with the freedom of people to engage in

Similar Essays

A Comparison Of The Economic Theories Of Adam Smith And Karl Marx


Comparing Karl Marx And John Stuart Mill

4526 words - 18 pages originally issued in several languages, including an English version. According to Mark, the modern age is a dangerous age, an age in which we might be alienated from that individual independence in work and in mind which defines our humanity. Confronted by this crisis, Karl Marx and John Stuart Mill offer the world diverging solutions: annihilate the existing world and march toward communism, or guard against the dangers of the existing world

The Utilitarian Philosophies Of Jeremy Bentham And John Stuart Mill

2070 words - 8 pages Compare and contrast the utilitarian philosophies of Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. Which do you think is the more convincing moral theory, and why?In terms of Utilitarianism, this assignment shall outline the philosophies of Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. It shall firstly illustrate the ideas of Bentham and then follow on to compare and contrast those of Mill. To continue, the assignment will view the failing qualities in both the

Viewpoints Of Durkhiem, Karl Marx, And Adam Smith

790 words - 4 pages keeps the classes where they are. People cannot rise the through the class system. The division of labor is a way of “social control” of the status hierarchy. ADAM SMITH: Adam smith is a good medium of Durkheim and Marx. Adam understood that for a nation, productivity is everything. A lot of productivity occurring within a nation correlates to a lot happening in it. Things are being made and sold because things are needed for different things