%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-ippm-rt-loss instead of this I-D. @techreport{morton-ippm-rt-loss-01, number = {draft-morton-ippm-rt-loss-01}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-morton-ippm-rt-loss-01}, author = {Al Morton}, title = {{Round-trip Loss Metrics}}, pagetotal = 11, year = 2010, month = oct, day = 6, abstract = {Many user applications and the transport protocols that make them possible require two-way communications. To address this need, and also for system simplicity, round-trip loss measurements are frequently conducted in practice. The Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol specified in RFC 5357 establishes a round-trip loss measurement capability for the Internet. However, there is currently no metric specified according to the RFC 2330 framework. This memo proposes/adds round-trip loss to the set of IP Performance Metrics (IPPM).}, }