Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.

August 08 2013

July 25 2013

Edward Snowden's fear of flying is justified | Geoffrey Robertson | Comment is free | The Guardian

Edward Snowden’s fear of flying is justified | Geoffrey Robertson | Comment is free | The Guardian

So far #Snowden has had three offers of asylum from Latin America, but to travel there means dangerous hours in the air. International law (and the Chicago Convention regulating air traffic) emphatically asserts freedom to traverse international airspace, but America tends to treat international law as binding on everyone except America (and Israel). Thus when Egypt did a deal with the Achille Lauro hijackers and sent them on a commercial flight to Tunis, US F-14 jets intercepted the plane in international airspace and forced it to land in Italy, where the hijackers were tried and jailed. President Mubarak condemned the action as “air piracy contrary to international law” and demanded an apology, to which Reagan replied: “Never.” The UK supported the action as designed to bring terrorists to trial.

In 1986 Israel forced down a Libyan commercial plane in the mistaken belief that PLO leaders were among its passengers, and the US vetoed UN security council condemnation.

So there must be a real concern, particularly after Nato allies collaborated in forcing down the Bolivian president’s jet, that the US will intercept any plane believed to be carrying Snowden to asylum, either because he is tantamount to a terrorist (Vice-President Biden has described Julian Assange as a “hi-tech terrorist”) or simply because they want to put him on trial as a spy.

#violation du #droit_international #Israël #Etats-Unis #pirates_de_l'air

Could not load more posts
Just a second, loading more posts...
You've reached the end.

Don't be the product, buy the product!