Nurturing a Healthy AMP Ecosystem

Through experience and learning gathered throughout our years of technical implementations, we know well that the ecosystems surrounding tools such as the Aid Management Platform (AMP) are much more critical to tool success than technology itself. In order to create a healthy environment for tools to thrive, several steps – and a consistent effort – are required. What are the different elements necessary to create a successful tool ecosystem?

AMP ecosystem_users

Figure 1: AMP users, key players in the AMP ecosystem

An energy source to sustain the system

Without sun, plants cannot live long. Similarly, technology tools need a stable, powerful energy source to survive. AMP requires strong leadership and support from multiple levels of government in order to both sustain the system and use it impactfully. It takes human effort to encourage data reporting and data use, to provide trainings, liaise between stakeholders, and highlight what makes the tool important. Without an energy source, the system will start to droop and fade, eventually dying.

Nutrients to sufficiently nourish the tool

Our systems need nourishment from key nutrients to become strong and “produce fruits,” or a tangible value add. Elements that help grow strong systems include:

  • A strong Data Management Plan, that is referred to often;
  • Consistent training and support;
  • A published Donor Scorecard – showing who is, and who isn’t, reporting;
  • Clear and apparent data use cases;
  • Awareness raising efforts.

Because every country context is different, each team must work to identify the right combination of these elements to provide the right nutrient-rich “diet” for its system.

Considering the various “organisms” in the ecosystem

We must also examine the role that organisms, or organizations and individuals using the tool, will play. To foster healthy ecosystems, we ask certain questions to ensure we understand the role each organism plays. While roles vary by country, key players we regularly consider include:

The tool’s government administrators

What ministry will own the system, and how many people will manage it? Are they mandated to do so? Will AMP simplify or alter their jobs, perhaps giving them power, recognition, or access? Do they have sufficient time to act as the “energy source” the system needs?

The Minister, Parliament, and other leadership

Are these individuals aware of AMP, and can they use its data? Will the Minister promote the tool? What decisions do they make that could be more data-driven? Who is providing them with data, and running any needed analysis?

Line Ministries

What type of relevant information can line ministries bring to the tool? How can they participate and benefit from using it?

Development Partners and NGOs/CSOs

Will DPs enter data for both off-budget and on-budget project information, and how often? What support will they need to access and use the data? Are NGOs/CSOs aware of the system, will they be entering data, and how can we ensure their access?

Other players includes journalists, local government officials, and citizens – again, we should gauge each group’s awareness of the tool, and consider how we can best support their access and use.

Remove Toxic Elements

Data collection tools can become laden with “toxic” data requests that don’t always have a clear need – overwhelming those who input data, and leading to poor reporting. Gathering feedback from the “organisms” helps ensure the data collected fits fits their needs – and is therefore useful. Identifying unnecessary data and cleaning up the system can help make a happier, healthier ecosystem. 

How does the ecosystem fit together?

A consistent energy source and nourishment, thoughtful consideration of organisms, and expelling toxic elements can help ensure country teams are taking a holistic approach to using AMP.

Our analysis can be split into three categories to guide users towards building a healthy ecosystem:


AMP ecosystem_figure

Figure 1: DG’s “Quick Guide” of elements to consider in the AMP Ecosystem.

While these ideas come from our own experience, we would love to hear from you about what you think we are missing – and what you’ve learned a happy, healthy tool ecosystem needs to thrive! Tweet at us at @DGateway or get in touch at

This blog is the second in a series of posts from our AMP Retrospective. Read the first post, Our Partnership Approach: 15 Years of Sustainable Collaboration in AMP. Additionally, stay tuned for more insights and perspectives from different members of the AMP team in the coming weeks.

Follow Us

Stay connected and learn the latest from Development Gateway

Learn The Latest

Subscribe to new updates

For information or inquiries, please contact us at
