Effect of Anisotropy on Stress-Strain and Pore Pressure Response of Normally and Heavily Over Consolidated Nagpur Expansive Soil

  • Naman KantesariaEmail author
  • Ajanta Sachan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 55)


Expansive soil is a residual cohesive soil, mostly present in the arid and semi-arid regions of the world. Stress induced anisotropy is an important aspect to be considered for the analysis and design of several geotechnical structures on expansive soils. Though, its effect is yet to be explored. Hence, the aim of the current study is to evaluate the effect of stress induced anisotropy on the shear behavior of normally and heavily over consolidated Nagpur expansive soil. Nagpur expansive soil is classified as CH (clay with high plasticity) type of soil with high amount of clay content (60%) and high value of differential free swell index (DFSI, 123%). Experimental research has been performed on Nagpur soil by conducting a series of anisotropically (Kc = 0.70, 0.85, 1) consolidated undrained (CU) triaxial compression tests at an over consolidation ratio (OCR) of 1 and 10. Change in void ratio during anisotropic consolidation phase was found to be a function of both, the mean effective stress and deviatoric stress. As Nagpur expansive soil was subjected to pre-shear stress during consolidation phase, its shear behavior showed distinctive response that was different from isotropic condition because of induced stress anisotropy. Normalized undrained shear strength was reduced for anisotropically consolidated specimen in comparison to isotropically consolidated specimen for both the OCR 1 and 10. Excess pore water pressure behavior and the A and βmax parameters were also significantly influenced by the induced stress anisotropy for both the normally and heavily over consolidated states.


Anisotropy Stress-strain Pore pressure Expansive soil K0 consolidation 



Financial Support from IIT Gandhinagar is gratefully acknowledged. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of IIT Gandhinagar.


  1. 1.
    Abdulhadi NO, Germaine JT, Whittle AJ (2012) Stress-dependent behavior of saturated clay. Can Geotech J 49(8):907–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amorosi A, Rampello S (2007) An experimental investigation into the mechanical behaviour of a structured stiff clay. Géotechnique 57(2):153–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anandarajah A, Kuganenthira N, Zhao D (1996) Variation of fabric anisotropy of kaolinite in triaxial loading. J Geotech Eng 122(8):633–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bozzano F, Bretschneider A, Martino S, Prestininzi A (2014) Time variations of the K0 coefficient in overconsolidated clays due to morphological evolution of slopes. Eng Geol 169:69–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cai Y, Hao B, Gu C, Wang J, Pan L (2018) Effect of anisotropic consolidation stress paths on the undrained shear behavior of reconstituted Wenzhou clay. Eng Geol 242:23–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Donaghe RT, Townsend FC (1978) Effects of anisotropic versus isotropic consolidation in consolidated-undrained triaxial compression tests of cohesive soils. Geotech Test J 1(4):173–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gao YB (2013) Compression and extension yield of an anisotropically consolidated soil. Soils Found 53(3):431–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Henkel DJ, Sowa VA (1964) The influence of stress history on stress paths in undrained triaxial tests on clay. In: Laboratory shear testing of soils. ASTM InternationalGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    IS: 2911 (PART-III) (1980) Indian Standard code of practice for design and construction of under-reamed piles. BISGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kamei T (2003) Effects of stress paths on undrained shear characteristics of anisotropically consolidated cohesive soil. J Jpn Soc Eng Geol 44(2):119–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kurukulasuriya LC, Oda M, Kazama H (1999) Anisotropy of undrained shear strength of an over-consolidated soil by triaxial and plane strain tests. Soils Found 39(1):21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ladd CC (1965) Stress-strain behaviour of anisotropically consolidated clays during undrained shear. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Montréal, vol 1, pp 282–286Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mayne PW (1985) Stress anisotropy effects on clay strength. J Geotech Eng 111(3):356–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mitchell JK, Soga K (2005) Fundamentals of soil behavior, vol 3. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sachan A, Penumadu D (2007) Effect of microfabric on shear behavior of kaolin clay. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133(3):306–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shi J, Qian S, Zeng LL, Bian X (2015) Influence of anisotropic consolidation stress paths on compression behaviour of reconstituted Wenzhou clay. Géotechnique Lett 5(4):275–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sivakumar V, Doran IG, Graham J (2002) Particle orientation and its influence on the mechanical behaviour of isotropically consolidated reconstituted clay. Eng Geol 66(3–4):197–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Skempton AW (1954) The pore-pressure coefficients A and B. Geotechnique 4(4):143–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology GandhinagarPalajIndia

Personalised recommendations