Inbreeding without depression

As in, normal group preference, genophilia. No mutations.

Reminds me of the study that found distant cousins most fecund.

Britons are still living in the same ‘tribes’ that they did in the 7th Century, Oxford University has found after an astonishing study into our genetic make-up. Archaeologists and geneticists were amazed to find that genetically similar individuals inhabit the same areas they did following the Anglo-Saxon invasion, following the fall of the Roman Empire.

In fact, a map showing tribes of Britain in 600AD is almost identical to a new chart showing genetic variability throughout the UK, suggesting that local communities have stayed put for the past 1415 years.




The findings also showed that there is not a single ‘Celtic’ genetic group. In fact the Celtic parts of the UK (Scotland, Northern Ireland, Wales and Cornwall) are among the most different from each other genetically.

And the research has finally answered the question of whether the Romans, Vikings and Anglo-Saxons interbred with the Brits or wiped out communities.

The team found that people in central and southern England have a significant DNA contribution from the Anglo-Saxons showing that the invaders intermarried with, rather than replaced, the existing population.

By choice or rape?

But there is no genetic signature from the Danish Vikings even though they controlled large parts of England – The Danelaw – from the 9th century, suggesting they conquered, kept largely to themselves, and then left. Only Orkney residents were found to have Viking DNA.

“We found that 25 per cent of the DNA of someone living in Orkney is from Norse ancestry which suggests that when the Vikings arrived they intermingled with the local population rather than wiping them out,” added Prof Peter Donnelly.

“Similarly the Saxons in Germany have contributed DNA to some of the English groups but not to some of the others. We can see not only the differences in the UK but the reasons for those differences in terms of population movements.”

Inbreeding is great if you have low genetic load in the participants, it preserves the health, looks and intellect of the bloodline. The breeding of good breeding was this deliberate sexual selection for fitness. It’s only a problem when you introduce mutations. They compound.

Outbreeding is far more likely to produce diseased or infertile offspring, much like a liger or a mongrel, the depression of mutations in genetic load can occur in a single generation.

Cognitive ability and fertility in Swedes

aka a select population of white people.




  1. I am right.
  2. When in doubt, see rule one.

My assumptions have statistical backing. Read up or FO.





Darwin on sex and dimorphism


“Individuals of the same species often present, as is known
to every one, great differences of structure, independently
of variation, as in the two sexes of various animals”

“Nevertheless these cases
are only exaggerations of the common fact that the female
produces offspring of two sexes which sometimes differ from
each other in a wonderful manner.”
“In some instances the males
alone, in other instances both males and females, have been
ences are rather more strongly marked, and when both
entomologists as good species.”


Among other mentions throughout and in other books of his.




Human history was polyandry

Most women got their top choice. If a woman has her pick of the men, that’s polyandry.

So, sure, genetically polygamy has a long history… most men would hate that system though.

But eggs (and the carrier) are expensive, sperm is worthless.


That is not a bad thing. Selecting out the weak are the ones whose offspring wouldn’t have survived long anyway. Humanity would’ve died out if they didn’t choose the healthy and civilized.

By low IQ alone, a sizable number of men should be rejected.

Insufficient men existed genetically for so-called hypergamy, a marriage detail of the 20th century where rich men preferred beauty in women (regardless of background, given the finite supply in their own class, they had to marry down) which has NOT continued into this one (aka not how evolution works). The social phenomena of hypergamy is why male sexual selection fails, it’s dysgenic, they fuck down and over generations, ruin their bloodline because they don’t have any decent standards (dating studies reinforce this). They prefer a pair of marginally nicer tits over quality descendants (see IQ/class studies, regression to the mean) who actually continue to breed (so their investment was not wasted).

To this day, white women are least likely to miscegenate, and yet men, knowing the ruin that follows, are somehow more open (sexually desperate) to the prospect. This is why women are the prudent, selecting sex, the peahens assessing the tail feathers. It’s the only system that works intergenerationally.

Monogamy is still the best course in my opinion (or look at the Third Worlds with too many men and not enough war falling into sewer-exploding chaos), the way humans have evolved in civilization (not like other primates) and it’s definitely the best course for men.

You know, mathematically.

Men save time picking a good woman, impressing a vast sample size of ONE and then mate guarding. Their instincts arise from ancestors’ success with this. Parental attachment becomes secure and that leads to stable child development e.g. later menarche, and then improves odds of grandchildren, etc… etc.

[Being a sterile manwhore means nothing in evolution.]

This isn’t about man feelings, thank you. It’s as impersonal as genetics.

From here on out, no normie filter.

You have been warned.

Much is written by foolish men on the longer technical male fertility window, omitting quality studies, but what they fail to notice is how the vast majority of men would’ve been dead by middle age (mid-30s) thanks to rites of passage, crime, war and disease. The best quality men had to be rewarded for surviving somehow.

They bring up wolf packs (one, monogamous alpha pair) and lion prides (most males are dead) without the slightest glimmer of self-awareness.


The cuck thing intrigued women because it seemed like quality men were getting their act together by refusing to support the weak ones any longer, letting the entitled leeches of society e.g. deadbeats, shrivel up without the taxpayer teat. It’s more a promise. Why did women vote for Trump? ACTION.

Hillary wanted to import weak, cowardly men to flood their already swelling domestic angry ranks of would-be rapists and murderers.

Women didn’t vote for her. Shocker.

“If I hated American men and wanted their legacy to die out, I’d convince them women are like the Jewish Lilith and never to marry or have kids (both of which extend male lifespan and joy).”

Anyone who falls for it deserves to die out.

Women didn’t talk about #killallmen because, well, we kill most of them by genetic suicide anyway. What’s there to say?

Why was this such a huge hit? Listen.

He didn’t think she was good enough, so she rejects him. Now he’s alone.

She wanted to invest, he didn’t. Now he can’t find equivalent offers.

What was she supposed to do, sit around and pine while her ovaries dried up? He had at least three years! That’s three decades in ovary time! Shit or get off the pot, man.

It’s like passing up on a Ferrari because it’s the wrong colour. Men are not passive.

[Also why fronting and negging do not work. Sir, there is a LINE. Please move over so the next guy can talk. You see this in clubs.]

Men get confused since women have options – it’s like offering BBQ to a vegan or a Prius to a Trump supporter, we don’t want those options.

We’d rather have NOTHING.

What’s worse for men – there’s no such thing as “alpha” or there is, and you aren’t one?

So why don’t women talk about it?

We do, you don’t hear it.

At no point did Jesus say “and thus every man is entitled to a waifu” but a lot of men heard it.

The perfect woman of proverbs 31 wears purple silks to make her husband look good but they point to the vain line in another section about pearl braids their husband can’t afford. The problem there isn’t jewelry and fashion, it’s keeping up with the Joneses instead of being a good wife. If you can be a good wife first, roll on the pearls.

Even under so-called polygyny, the women get to choose to marry – the best man, rejecting N-1 of males.

Again, basic maths.

However, this was in there:

I’m sure they forgot.

To be friendzoned, you must actually be friends.

Most people are acquaintances.

Hey guys, I am very smart for saying this but – water is wet?

Why are misogynists so common and misandrists so rare?

To this day, I haven’t seen a misandrist go on a murder spree.

Thousands of years and counting. They have cause, look at crime stats.

What are they doing in revenge? You don’t see a future together? Funny, so does she.

Imagine if women sent an influx of vag pics to Milo. It looks like an audition.

Why do we ‘slut shame’? Fine, I’ll humour you. They don’t choose good men, allow bad behaviour that inconveniences everyone and add shit to the gene pool. Nobody wants shit in their pool.

You let the men think they run everything while killing off the ones who disrespect you.

And that’s why you are here.

The top segment of men support this, by the way, roll on Patriarchy, time of oddly fatal male labour? Abortion only for rape babies? Lots and lots of ground war? Why did Marx point out class war as crushing men? Men are their own worst enemy.

Try to deny it to yourself with each passing year. Women win, just accept it and maybe you can share in it.

Why do “male feminists” turn out to be secretly misogynist the whole time?
Why do they have a reputation for rejection?

This is why weaker men wanted to prevent women from deciding for themselves who to marry.

Evolution is brutal and cannot abide weakness. Mother Nature.

Your ancestors were the least misogynistic of the bunch, it’s selective breeding like domesticating dogs. And you think, to keep women in line and producing for society, being the exception will help you? Ask Elliot how that went. Product of hypergamy Elliot. Angry, mongrel Elliot, who blamed women instead of his father who didn’t want a white son. Cannon fodder in saner times. Not heir material. Why did he preferentially stab Asian males?

Misogynists hate women – but they hate men even more. Most psychopaths are misogynists, most psychopaths are men, most homicide victims are….. ?

Did ya guess? It’s men. If only there were a clever way for nature to resolve this problem. To produce a… civilization?

They don’t become crazy because they’re bachelors, they are bachelors because they are crazy.

If women are crazy, why want them?

As mentioned here and elsewhere, misogyny is a known trait of the inferior male.

Good men don’t despise femininity. Rich people don’t hate the banks.

If you had to choose a man to invest in, would you choose a protector or abuser?

Good men use the death penalty to remove the scum from the gene pool, women use passivity with not a drop of blood spilled and each generation progressively more peaceful. Until the weak men imported more dregs out of spite. What do they salivate over? Men being killed in terror attacks, no valor and women being raped, no choice.

That is the omega.

Omega females want pretty women to have ugly, stupid or mud babies. You can’t be out-competed by a better bloodline that doesn’t exist. Again, spite is evil. Wrath is a deadly sin.

That picture needs two fewer dogs and two more children. Ban pets and the white birth rate would skyrocket.

Remember, Muslims hate dogs? Pattern recognition is a skill.

Why in times of war do women say of men in praise “he was a good man, he didn’t deserve to die”, what does that imply?

Male infertility drug in the air

An accident, I’m sure.

Economic boom follows fertility boom.

Economic collapse follows demographic collapse.

Missing factor is IQ.

You want young people to breed?

  1. stop punching down at the young.
  2. Incentivise young people to marry.

Then they’ll breed. They don’t marry? They shouldn’t breed!

Otherwise the kids are shit-tier. All the child psych research agrees for once.

This is very basic Civilization 101 stuff.

Pollution is dysgenic. Outsourcing national labour is too. Right-wingers have more cause to care. Less kids? Well, they say, we need more immigrants, because humans are interchangeable cogs under the globalism of supranationalism! God forbid they make less of a profit for a while, after taking on a business risk!

See, globalism is actually just code for slave labour and national betrayal.

Also imperative: stop the rent generation and tax the fat wankers playing real life Monopoly, punish carcinogenic food producers and teach children with rote rather than pretending school isn’t a job.
Why do we pay for prisoners to get free housing, food etc? Where’s the vote on the death penalty? We never had a referendum, especially on traitors. Guy Fawkes was hanged for attacking Parliament and he was white.

Ashkenazi tracked to Turkey

Have you noticed three facts about DNA testing?

1.a lot of Jews are funding collection and keeping the data (FROM anyone else)

2.they admit they want to use it for ‘medical research’ (vague AF)

3.they also fund immortality and generic ‘health’ programs including GE

GE= genetic engineering if you’re not up on terms.
Including designer babies, which recently became legal in the UK with 3-parent precedent.

The paper in the Guardian about youthful blood should’ve really spiked your interest.
The Boomers will do anything to stick around kicking, they funded all this sci-fi research from the beginning, they intend to cash out.
Why ask young people exclusively to donate blood, that doesn’t make any sense. Surely all blood is good, it’s the same blood. Unless they don’t want it for transfusions. Read the terms carefully. And there’s never enough. Sounds like a sample, rather than a legitimate use.

Rhesus research is right near the top of that list of topics but I don’t know much about it.
There’s a lot of misinformation which doesn’t rustle me whatsoever.
I do know it’s most common in Whites (primal Europeans), much like the longevity studies focusing precisely on NW Europe and especially Italy (it isn’t the diet, saps) but so is Rhesus-neg. There is no such thing as coincidence in conversations of genetics and genealogy.

What’s unusual about the history of NW Europe?
It invented basically everything, in historical terms it’s the most eugenic population.
Italy for artists of the Renaissance, France for philosophers, Germany for composers and writers and Britain for scientists and inventors.

Look up anything I just said. There are too many links to post and obviously some are too dangerous for the uneducated masses so I’d be linking to a paywall. Did you know you can pirate academic papers now? I don’t think you should, but academia has been screwed along with Hollywood.

Death is genetic





Unclear. Probably K but the variables are iffy.


Sexual competition.

In a vacuum, K is superior for a society.

Empires rise with K, die with r.





Nature is nationalist.


MALTHUS, she said, screaming into the void.





White men throw infertility parties

white people wtf

wtf white people

my fellow white people


1 those don’t always work, pregnancies can and do still happen
2 it isn’t an achievement, it’s the opposite of an achievement
3 you’re really jealous of the people who can afford kids huh
4 mememe attention-whoring, please don’t breed
5 this is eugenic, test their IQ
6 desperation cakes
7 the anti-natal delusion is strong

Best comment I’ve seen from a man

This is probably the most pathetic damn thing I’ve ever seen. If you’re not having a kid, stop celebrating literally nothing. What is even the point of this, if not just for attention? “Hey look at me, I’m NOT having a kid, and my life is completely the same except now I’m even less of a man!”

More like Look at me, I sterilized MYSELF!

Take THAT, Dad!




True, they’re ALL buying dogs. But they’re not lonely. See Point 6.
If a woman doesn’t mind never marrying you, doesn’t want kids and is OK that you’re infertile? She is NOT traditional.


Yeah, that’s a black guy acting like being a deadbeat is a good thing.


They assume they are the ultimate specimen of their genetic line. It’s narcissistic.
I post these to show what people (all these comments but one are from men) truly THINK on the subject, right-leaning people, compared to how they may respond to you VERBALLY.

Freud would have never foresaw this outcome as remotely possible, regarding the Oedipus Complex. Self-castration? Tranny stuff. Self-sterilization? Right here. But sure, they’re so smart, as they posture for their Guardianista friends.

Does MGTOW really wanna be lumped in with these people? If you’re avoiding women, you don’t need to be sterile.

In evolution, if an organism is faulty, it won’t reproduce…………….


They aren’t signalling the superiority they think they are.
More like laziness and hatred of the nuclear family.