Mysteries at Montauk: Christopher Garetano's Paranormal Cinema

Among conspiracy theories, none have captured my imagination more powerfully than the alleged Montauk Project. Like a great X-Files episode, nearly every tantalizing element of paranormal and government conspiracy lore weaves its way into the story. The saga was first popularized in the 1992 book, The Montauk Project: Experiments in Time, by Preston Nichols and Peter Moon. The legends continued to build in the underground through websites and on late-night radio appearances throughout the 90's and the 2000's. My first point of contact with Montauk came from hearing a particularly compelling rendition of the story told by filmmaker, Christopher Garetano on a Coast to Coast AM appearance. In talking about the film he made called Montauk Chronicles, he laid out an incredible tale that had my ears glued to the speakers. I ordered the DVD as soon as it came out and proceeded to scour the Net for more info on the topic.

When I watched the film, I was really immediately blown away with how artfully crafted and imaginative it was. I thought then as I do now, that regardless of whether the clandestine project actually existed or not, the provocative nature of the story and the way Garetano presents it, makes his work well-worth the time of any fan of the paranormal or extraterrestrial.

Christopher preparing to shoot - At Camp Hero

Garetano’s enthusiasm for sci-fi, horror and conspiracies shine through, making his handling of the subject feel very real and genuine. I find it refreshing in his statements that he allows the audience to draw their own conclusions and leaves the narrative open-ended to interpretation. Many people who are in this field of study usually provide very definitive explanations that demand belief or disbelief. Although the subjects that appear in his film want you to believe every word they say, the perspective I took away from the film felt cryptic, like an unsolved mystery. 

As an artist, Garetano is the purest of the pure. Totally self-made and largely self-financed, his commitment to creating the best pieces of work possible is undeniable. His dedication to doing things his way without external studio pressures and meddling is hugely admirable. I think it's fair to say his approach to filmmaking is very much a guerrilla, DIY punk-rock ethic. Albeit, with a more intense focus on perfection than a free-flowing garage band. 

In between his continued promotion for Montauk and his furious work on a new film, I had the pleasure of talking with him about some curiosities I had about the conspiracy itself as well as his personal influences and life experiences.

The story known as the Montauk Project, classically associated with Alfred Bielek, Preston Nichols, and Stewart Swerdlow, has been circulating in the paranormal/conspiracy field for a long time. When was it that you first came into contact with it and what did you initially think of it?
Looking back in hindsight, it’s truly astonishing to me how long this story has been in my life. It only fully occurred to me in recent years. The first time that I encountered Camp Hero was in the early eighties, when I was kid.

The alleged experiments were still in the tail-end of their flux. My family and I spent our summer vacations in Montauk, New York. It’s actually a very popular vacation-spot, in the summer season, for New Yorkers. The town, from June to September, thrives with tourists, but in the winter it’s the polar-opposite- and it’s virtually empty. 
One day, I was walking on the rocky-beach of Montauk Point, with several members of my family and two military guards stopped us. They told us that we couldn’t go any further. I wasn’t sure exactly why at the time, but looking back now I realize we were about to walk into some kind of restricted-zone, bordering the Air Force Base.
Furthermore, If I knew of any stories of aliens, time-travel or the horrors of the mind-control experiments, my dog days of summer would have been much more interesting. It wasn’t until much later, in the mid 90’s, when I came across that very first book, by Preston Nichols. I wasn’t really impressed, as that book is very thinly laid-out, it’s a short-read and has almost nothing regarding the (Montauk-Boy) atrocities that allegedly occurred there. I also believe certain things were invented to sell the story. The explanations, regarding the technology were esoteric at best. So it wasn’t until later, in 2006, that my interest was sparked to make Montauk Chronicles.
It was really the idea of speaking with the subjects that appealed to me the most. The idea of actually speaking face to face with the men who swore by the tale, was a whole different prospect. My approach opened-up doors for a larger variety of investigative ideas. 
My interest was making an epic movie, with a completely new analysis rather than an adaptation of any of the books that came before my movie. 

This film is truly a labor of love for you. You have been immersed in horror, filmmaking and alternative media for a long time. What does it mean to you to have seen this project through?
It means the world to me. How else can I say it? I made two movies called Montauk Chronicles; One that’s out in the world right now and another that very few people saw when it was screened publicly. The screenings started in late 2011 and throughout 2012.
It played at the International UFO Congress, and a few other places around the world. I was never happy with it. Parts of it worked and others certainly didn’t. I made a hard decision in late 2012 to do something major to it. I threw the first version away and I was very prepared to start all over again. I was technically and mentally prepared for the redux and I was very inspired. The production was difficult but rewarding, throughout.  We had very little money, and help, but I knew what I was doing. My skills were sharp, so I was ready. I love the post-process of moviemaking but this one was an intense situation that seemed to have a series of endless obstacles. I began to disassociate with the “real world” around me and all that really mattered was the fucking movie. I was really tired by the second year of making the second movie. It was a full time job and it had already been going on for years with the other version.
I was homeless in the last year and a half, while making Montauk Chronicles. I lived in five different locations during that time. The bulk of the movie was edited, during a hot and humid summer, in a room with poor-ventilation and no air conditioning. Strange things happened too. One day, out of the blue I was covered in carpenter ants while editing. They were everywhere, all over the computer, all over me, inside the computer!!!

Other times it seemed weeks would pass and I was working full time every day and only advancing forward very slowly. It was my choice to stick with it but certainly not an easy one. I could have thrown in the proverbial towel at any time, but I didn’t. All of my money and time went into the movie. I hadn’t had a vacation in almost 10 years and my weekdays, as well as the weekends, were always full time work-days. It was very uncomfortable but I was afflicted with the constant need to work on the movie, full- time, because there was no other way to do it. I also had my regular job and private life to deal with as well. I slept only a few hours a night.
I was quite sick at the very end of it all. I lost forty-five pounds and sincerely felt like I was going insane. When you’re serious about making a feature-length movie it isn’t a hobby. It doesn’t work that way.

It was the second time I made this movie and I had to complete it in less than two years. That was my personal deadline. Movie making means the world to me. I dedicated my whole life to this thing and I made that decision a long time ago. It’s who I am. It’s a way of life. I’ve also experienced a lot of life. I have a rich reservoir to draw from, as a storyteller, and I think that’s just as important as understanding your craft technically. 

Horror movies, literature and suspenseful storytelling are ancient and are very integral to cultures around the world and throughout history. Even ancient literature like Homer and certainly Dante (The Inferno) should be considered horror. Religious texts and certainly religious-history is partially horror. Greek mythology owns structural ligaments comprised of many horror stories. Great artists, throughout history, have used horror as a way of expression so I’m not apologetic, in any way, for making a dark piece of artwork/storytelling. 
If the Montauk experiments did indeed happen and if you were to be immersed in that reality it would be an infinite galaxy of brutal, unimaginable terror. 
A lot of people read about these things but for some reason their imagination refuses to translate it into the purely macabre story that it inherently is. So, I felt it there was no other way to make this but to bring those elements of horror into the picture. I’m glad I did. There’s really no other way that this story should be told.

This is one of my favorite “urban legends” ever, due to the scope of material involved and the sheer range of phenomena attached to it. You have The Philadelphia Experiment, Nazis, aliens, time-travel, remote viewing, mind control, a government cover-up, bizarre creatures, abduction, torture, an underground air force base, ESP and more. Are you surprised when certain people go along with certain aspects of the story and not others?

I’m a firm believer in asking many questions and paying an almost macroscopic attention to the physical reaction of the subject. There’s so much that can be learned from a person’s body language, facial expression and voice inflection. When someone is putting a story out into the world, as elaborate and seemingly far-fetched as this Montauk tale, they shouldn’t deliver hazy recollections when questioned. They should be prepared for it and also should remember an incredible amount of detail. 
In 1998 I found a good friend of mine, ten hours after he died. It was a tragic and a profoundly miserable experience to say the least. It happened years ago but I can remember every detail to this moment.  
If someone was in an elaborate government program and saw, aliens, experienced time-travel, witnessed brutal murders, rapes, and was in it for thirteen years, they better not tell me that it’s hard to remember. 
The recollection should be vivid and offer myriad details. A liar, who is fabricating a story, will NEVER be able to create such an infinitely textured picture as a true experience warrants. 

So, I’m naturally cautious when it comes to somebody offering outrageous claims. It frustrates me sometimes that many people so easily believe the jokers out there claiming to be time-travelers or psychic-gurus who NEVER offer a shred of credible detail or evidence. I believe in the possibilities of most of the above, but rarely do I immediately trust or believe some guy on the internet claiming to have had dinner with George Washington just because HE says so. Also you can’t be selective with these things. The same men who claim that the “Montauk Boys” were murdered are also the same men who suggest there were monsters, aliens, Nazi-scientists and just about everything else down at Camp Hero.

Do the viewers need to accept that the entire story being told by Alfred Bielek, Preston Nichols, and Stewart Swerdlow as 100% factual or is it possible that some parts are true and others are something else?
No, because it’s very possible that portions are fabricated. For whatever reason, parts of it might have been put out there as disinformation or for pure profit and sensationalism. I believed very-little when I was first going in.  It wasn’t until later that I started to believe; when I was researching almost identical government programs that were actually proven. 
As for Montauk, I found the entire situation to be intriguing, you know? The situation as a whole was interesting to me. What we have here are several grown and even elderly men who are making some very wild claims that they cannot prove to this day.

We live in strange times where the boundaries between fantasy and reality are completely breached. It wasn’t until I began to research other documented cases like MK ULTRA and the Tuskegee experiments, that I really considered the Montauk Project as fact. The trouble that I had with it in the beginning is that the claims from my three subjects were tantamount, in theme, to a bad science fiction movie and this is really why I made a second movie because I feel that I didn’t get enough from them the first time around.

Unless you’re completely gullible it isn’t until you begin to truly research the possibilities that the elements of the Montauk Project become believable.
You went all in when it came to digging and doing the research, talking to the key players involved. What was the most frustrating aspect of the evidence gathering process due to an inability to verify claims beyond the witness testimony?
For a long time The Montauk Project story wasn’t as popular as it is now. The most frustrating aspect was that it was only four men who claimed they were part of it. So it was only Alfred Bielek, Preston Nichols, Stewart Swerdlow, and Duncan Cameron. I personally spoke to all of them and interviewed three of them for my movies. I re-interviewed Stewart Swerdlow and Preston Nichols for the new version (of Montauk Chronicles) in 2013 and 2014.  It wasn’t until I had already made the first movie and began screening it in 2012 that more people started to claim that they were part of it. And several people contacted me between 2013 and 2014 while I was making the second movie.   
Stewart Swerdlow, Alfred Bielek, Preston Nichols 

There’s this whole notion in the darker crevices of conspiracy legend about Project Monarch, that allegedly grew out of MKULTRA, which we know is documented on the public record. The main premise is abduction of young children and putting them threw a mind fracturing process and then rebuilding their minds with personality alters, often that can preform tasks for the government. Assassinations, sex slavery, spying, etc. There seems to be a connection in that story with the claims that come out of Montauk. Have you made any of your own connections with that or has anyone contacted you along those lines?
The people you see in the film, of course made those connections. In addition to that, I’ve had MANY people contact me now that claim they’re connected to alike projects. It seems like that population is growing now but I can clearly remember when it was only Alfred, Stewart, Preston and Duncan.

This thing will continue to grow. I receive emails from people with new info a few times a month.

The fact that a programs like MKULTRA and Project Stargate have been proven, opens the door for all sorts of other claims of black projects related to mind control or human experimentation. What’s the standard of proof that is acceptable when these sorts of theories are presented?
We need more witnesses. Credible witnesses are preferable. People with backgrounds that we can cross-reference and prove. Air Force, scientists, official personnel that make the same claims as our current subjects. Usually credible people who have a job or reputation at risk are much more believable people than some mystery man with a half-assed story and a book.

From your estimation, is th
ere a single piece of the story that acts as a “smoking gun”? If not, what is that one aspect of the story that makes the job of debunking difficult?

At this time the story doesn’t have a black and white punch-line. I think the answer might be found in a small or seemingly insignificant clerical mistake. Something that was overlooked. A paper trail. I think I found one and I’ve been looking into it but I can’t say much more. I can say It might lead to information as to how this whole thing, if true, was funded.

Has anything new surfaced related to the story since the release of the film?
Yes, and I’m currently keeping it close to the vest.  

Do you think mind control is still on the agenda these days? Do you have any thoughts on what kinds of clandestine scientific experiments the government would be interested in today?
I would pay attention to the plague of random shootings in the states and abroad. It’s far too strange and numerous to just be a bunch of copycats. There’s really something wrong here. It doesn’t feel right. It’s not normal and I think there should be more independent investigations to try to connect some dots with these things. I speak to my elders about our current time and they agree that something is unusual even in comparison to the usual chaos of the world.

What are the things that keep you up at night trying to wrap your mind around?
I have been severely effected by this whole experience. 
I’ve had bouts with horrible anxiety as well as bizarre dreams related to the subject matter. I’ve had reoccurring dreams of programming and even dreams of strange beings attacking me at night.

I had this insane dream of this small humanoid creature running at me and it began to poke me in my rips with a small, sharp metallic object. Outside of that, I have a love for fiction, cinema, art and music and I have some exciting and original ideas that I’m determined to turn into motion pictures. I think we live in a shamelessly unoriginal time. We need to change. I’m going to do my best to help. Movie making is an “expensive paint-box” as Orson Welles said but it’s so much better than it ever was, for the independent movie maker. So infinitely better. More of us just need to take advantage of what’s available to us. 

Aside from the fantastic tale being told, what stood out were the beautiful cinematic sequences you created to help visualize the narrative. Your creativity and craftsmanship in that area is truly impressive considering the resources you had available. There’s some truly haunting images and vivid cinematography. What was your creative process for generating the stylistic look and effects for those particular sections?
I have my influences in film, art, music and literature. I have Influences in nature and in life. I study and practice my craft as much as possible. I love film history and it’s so important, for a filmmaker, to know about it. I’ve been completely sober for 16 years but a few psychedelic-drug experiences, from my past, have also opened doors and allowed ideas in. These are ideas that I don’t think would be as authentic if I didn’t have those strange-experiences to refer to. 

I don’t recommend anyone do anything that will compromise their minds or lives so please don’t take my previous statement as an encouragement to indulge in dangerous or illegal drug-use. To find and develop a personal style, as a movie maker, you must try to reject the urge to copy or consciously pay-tribute to other movie makers in your own work. The style must flow naturally. I never think of other movies and never try to imitate their shots. I’m always thinking about what’s in front of me and how it should be expressed to the audience. How will it effect the audience and how much coverage I would need for post-production.

I loved the music score in the film. There’s a nice bonus on the DVD about it. Can you comment on the importance of capturing the right tone and mood with the music? Will the tracks ever be made available on their own?
Krystal Cordero is the composer and she did an amazing job. To help prepare her I played a few records  (various John Carpenter, Tangerine Dream, Vangelis, Susan Justin) and told her of my own influences in art and literature. We had musical interests, in common, but we also discussed a pure-mood for various scenes as well.

I love the score, it’s really unique and I can’t wait to release it. I know people are going to truly enjoy experiencing it as its own piece of artwork, as I usually do with movie scores. 
The digital version of the Montauk Chronicles score will be available very soon. I’m preparing for its release as I write this. The vinyl release will soon follow. I always wanted the ultimate release of the score to be an experience to accompany the movie. So it’s Krystal’s musical cues mixed with soundbites from the movie, including narration, clips from interviews, sound effects and sound clips from recreations. 

The music can change everything in a picture. I can think of a so many movies that fell-short because of the wrong score. I think they would be infinitely better if the score was changed. For example. take a movie like Joel Schumacher’s 8mm. It’s not a bad movie but I think the score was a major factor in its demise.
Imagine if you will a score like Tangerine Dream did for William Friedkin’s Sorcerer or what Vangelis conjured for Blade Runner and that movie would have been completely different. It kind of turns into predictable action movie at the end but most of it is a slow burn dark, brooding, macabre-noir story of the seedy pornography underworld. The current 8mm score doesn’t work so it takes away from some otherwise brilliant movie making. It behooves any filmmaker to know music and film history.
Do you think the film accomplished what you hoped it would?
It was all my choice. I was the director, producer, writer, cinematographer, editor, colorist, visual effects artist and sound designer. I feel I accomplished what I set out to accomplish with it. Under the circumstances, with the truly limited budget and very few hands on deck, I think we overachieved. I’m very happy with it. 
I wasn’t happy with the first version and it was painful to throw away and start over again. But it was a freedom that I needed and I learned so much making the second version. 

I know you are in the midst of a new film on the Bigfoot story. Can you tell me what drew you to that over all other possibilities amongst paranormal subjects?  How will your approach make this well-documented topic unique and add something new to the legend?
The first element that drew me to BIGFOOT is that I derive energy from nature, especially the forest. I needed a grounding situation after almost a decade of Montauk Chronicles. 
Another is that BIGFOOT is such a saturated subject matter but it’s never truly been covered correctly, outside of literature.
So, I’m not interested in making yet another movie/documentary about people walking around the woods, finding absolutely nothing. 

I’m also not interested in making a junky z-movie that disregards the incredible history surrounding the creature, science, evidence and the legends. My movie is something completely different. There is a rich, serious and detailed history of stories that haven’t been adapted or only adapted in a careless, shaky-cam fashion. 
I’m offering a true-experience of the BIGFOOT history in such a way that you’ll be immersed in the folklore. I want to take you back in time and take you into the woods. I want to remove you from the artifice and allow you to experience the forest. The stories will be thrilling, emotional, dark, and sympathetic. They will be connected with uniquely expressive examples of nature and narrative philosophy that’s unusual for a picture regarding this subject. In other words, I hope to blow you the FU@& away. ;)
Christopher, shooting scenes for BIGFOOT

To connect with Christopher's work, follow him on Twitter, or go to the Montauk Chronicles website.


  1. I had no idea they were using kids at Montuck. I always thought it was experienced with animals. Those poor kids. Thank you for opening my old tired eyes. Sincerley, Claudia

  2. The other part that is essential with a home cinema is the way you will output signals to the home cinema HD projector. Cinema 21

  3. There are countless issues here but no film shows the real picture of running a family but instead all films target the junior and 90% of the movies are based on love stories. here

  4. Watch Love Rosie Online – Free Streaming 2014 Full 123 HD on Putlocker. It is just loosely based on it, because the story differs somewhat. I won’t reveal anything else, to avoid spoilers. All I’ll say is that it works because it captures the essence of the book.




  8. Montauk, Philadelphia and other X-Files... ScyFy Romance garbage or truly conspiration? The one that says "yes it's true" have his reason but the other that says "That's absurd. Bullshit and lies!" also have some reason. To believe or not is up to you!

  9. Awesome work, thanks for sharing this stuff openly here
    freeflix for android

    kingroot apk

  10. All you have to do is look on the Internet at the massive numbers of websites that expose Stewart Swerdlow as a con artist, charlatan, liar, cheat, wannabe, scammer and fraud. Swerdlow cannot speak 12 languages, plagiarized the Language of Hyperspace from Maryanne Johnston, who was a half American Indian, half German blind social worker, who shared her hyperspace knowledge with Stewart Swerdlow. He simply took Maryanne Johnston's knowledge. She was an extraterrestrial experiencer, unlike the lying fantasist Stewart Swerdlow. The galactic history information that Stewart Swerdlow talks about is not his own. He has used other peoples research and pretends it is his own. Swerdlow is a liar and a deceiver without any real talents.

    Stewart Swerdlow was never even on the Montauk Project and was nothing more than the johnny-come-lately wannabe that reinvented himself by pretending he was a Montauk Boy and nothing could be further from the truth. Swerdlow is a total and utter liar who made up his backstory because he was only interested in building a persona for himself that gullible people would believe. At the Global Sciences Congress (GSC) in February 1999, in Daytona, Florida, Stewart Swerdlow approached Alfred Bielek who was talking with Duncan Roads, the Nexus Magazine editor, and accused Bielek of making up his Philadelphia Experiment story. Alfred Bielek then became enraged and wanted to punch Stewart Swerdlow in the face. Swerdlow suggested the idea that Bielek could connect his fake Philadephia Experiment story to Swerdlow's own fake backstory, concerning what he called the 'Montauk Project' because Swerdlow wanted to legitimize his own backstory.

  11. The excellent Bielek Debunked website as overwhelmingly proven that the Philadelphia Experiment and the Montauk Project never actually happened and were nothing more than fantasy stories made up by Alfred Bielek and Stewart Swerdlow. As well as this Swerdlow is seriously sick in the head because at the Global Sciences Congress (GSC) in February 1999, in Daytona, Florida, Swerdlow stood on stage and told an audience of over 500 people whilst he was being filmed, that he sodomized to death 300 orphaned boys on the Montauk Project. That means Stewart Swerdlow is a child molesting pedophile. Swerdlow always tells people the Illuminati can only build programming around the victim pattern of the individual. What does that say about Stewart Swerdlow then?

    Then there are all the B.S. backstories and lies Swerdlow makes up. Like the one about him and Yakov Sverdlov. Stewart Swerdlow always mentions the disinformation about Yakov Sverdlov being his great-uncle. However Stewart Swerdlow was never related to Yakov Sverdlov and Swerdlow does not have Russian ancestry whatsoever. Swerdlow's ancestry actually comes from Belarus and Poland. Many people now know Stewart Swerdlow's family never originated from Russia in the first place because researchers have done his genealogy. Yakov Sverdlov was also never the first head of state of the Soviet Communist Party in Russia because he died in 1919 and the Soviet Union was not established until 1922. Swerdlow is simply hoodwinking and tricking gullible people and nothing more with such rubbish because he likes to add his fake genealogical backstory to his fake, non-existent involvement on the Montauk Project.

  12. Remember Stewart Swerdlow constantly tells everyone that he was blind for 29 years before he could see properly again in 1999. Stewart Swerdlow said he could only see in 'swirls of energy'. Then how could he have worked at a food wholesalers whilst blind in 1990 and 1991? Then he published Montauk: The Alien Connection in January 1998. How could he have written that load of disinformation and plagiarized material if he was blind until 1999 and could ony see in 'swirls of energy'? Stewart Swerdlow could never stand on a stage and fluently speak the 12 languages he states he knows because of course, Swerdlow is a liar with zero language skills. Swerdlow is a con man of the worst kind. Apart from such insights, the information you have discussed concerning Al Bielek, Preston Nichols and Duncan Cameron, has helped a lot and is very constructive in unraveling much of the Montauk Project propaganda and deceptions.

    People must understand that Stewart Swerdlow is a serious disinformer that could not care less about his clients or ex-clients welfare. Swerdlow has developed a fake persona, a fake business and a fake career where he states he is one of the world's 'foremost hyperspace intuitives'. You will never see Swerdlow on stage demonstrating his usage of the Language of Hyperspace, because it is all fake and a marketing gimmick. Stewart Swerdlow spins lots of lies. Look at his book, Blue Blood, True Blood where Swerdlow talks about the U2 spyplane. Swerdlow talks about the U2 spyplane that was shot down in the 1960s over the city of Sverdlovsk. Swerdlow is a complete idiot because the U2 spyplane he is referring to was actually shot down in 1960 south west of highway P-351 and Verkhneye Dubrovo, which is an urban locality in Beloyarsky of the Sverdlovsk Oblast. An oblast is a county or large political region. It is not a city like Stewart Swerdlow stated. This shows Swerdlow knows nothing about Russia and is most definitely a complete fake, a fraudster and a con man who cannot even get his facts straight when inventing his silly backstories.

  13. The entire charade that is presented in The Montauk Chronicles just further confirms what many people have always felt and suspected about the Montauk Project, and that is all of it was nothing more than a gigantic pack of lies and disinformation from the beginning. Back in 1990 and 1991 Preston Nichols began to talk about the Montauk Project. You have to remember that Preston Nichols was a recluse that lived with his father in East Islip, Long Island, in a rundown house where he did very little. Nichols ate junk food all day, including SPAM, popcorn and chocolate whilst watching up to 16 hours of television each day. Nichols simply made up the Montauk Project rubbish because he wanted to be noticed. Then the wannabe fantasist, con man, liar and charlatan Stewart Swerdlow began talking about the Montauk Project rubbish after he got his criminal record in 1992 and watched how Preston Nichols was promoting himself.

    For a long term Alfred Bielek constantly told people how Stewart Swerdlow was never on the Montauk Project and Swerdlow was a deceiver who wanted to be famous. Stewart Swerdlow also plagiarized his misused Language of Hyperspace information from Maryanne Johnston, that many people know was a half American Indian, half German extraterrestrial experiencer and abductee. So nothing Nichols and Swerdlow have ever talked about is true. Stewart Swerdlow always embellishes everything he talks about. Bielek has also been proven to have been a complete liar all along at the Bielek Debunked website, which has shown the Philadelphia Experiment was all made up. However Stewart Swerdlow is the worst out of them all and is a charlatan, fraud and scam artist who cares little for anything apart from his own ego and enjoying being the Great Pretender in front of the camera to keep duping anyone foolish enough to believe his fibbling.

  14. You can have a dynamite script, talented unknown actors, film director with vision, and your desire as an independent producer on your side, but without some kind of hook chances of finding film money will not happen. I have found myself in that position as a producer of independent entertainment. What did I do?

  15. I have to say I was not impressed with 'Mysteries At Montauk' at all. The whole film production tries to look profound, but the Montauk Project rubbish has already been disproven by the researchers over at Bielek Debunked, who spent over 10 years researching the lies of Alfred Bielek and Stewart Swerdlow. Therefore when it comes to the validity of the Montauk Project, everything that Swerdlow talks about in his backstory can be proven to be 100 percent false. This means the Montauk Project was a ruse used by Swerdlow to reinvent himself. Most people already know that Stewart Swerdlow attended the Global Sciences Congress (GSC) in Daytona, Florida, in February 1999 and in the main reception area had a huge argument with Alfred Bielek, in front of Duncan Roads, the Nexus Magazine editor. Swerdlow accused Bielek of making up his Philadelphia Experiment story but wanted Bielek to segway his story to Swerdlow's fake backstory about the Montauk Project. All Stewart Swerdlow really cared about was reinventing his persona after coming out of prison in 1992.

    The production of 'Mysteries At Montauk' should have better researched the lies of Stewart Swerdlow. Even the Language of Hyperspace information Swerdlow always talks about, was never actually anything to do with him. Swerdlow plagiarized the hyperspace information from his social worker, the half German, half American Indian clairvoyant and extraterrestrial experiencer, Maryanne Johnston. Even the lie Swerdlow told everyone about himself being blind until September 1999, was plagiarized from her to embellish his own backstory. The Montauk Project deception was firstly developed by Preston Nichols and then the johnny-come-lately Stewart Swerdlow liked the idea of reinventing himself on the New Age Circuit, so he therefore latched onto the Montauk Mythos. Stewart Swerdlow is quite simply a charlatan, a fraud, a liar and a con artist with zero clairvoyant abilities, who was never involved with the Montauk Project. Many people also now realize this and steer clear of the Montauk Project disinformation.

  16. After watching 'Mysteries At Montauk' there was not that sense of sincerity in the subject matter. I used to read a lot about the Montauk Project and now realize from doing some serious research into that whole science fiction fantasy world, that nothing about the Montauk Project is true or real. Over at the Bielek Debunked website there is so much credible information that has finally exposed the entire lie the Montauk Project came to represent. Alfred Bielek was a complete liar and a fraud. The other individual who is also a deceiver is Stewart Swerdlow, who was never even involved with the Montauk Project and is nothing more than a fraud and a con man. Stewart Swerdlow is now the only individual who is constantly perpetuating the whopping great lie that the Montauk Project was real. Of course Swerdlow does, otherwise his credibility will immediately go to zero and everybody will know Stewart Swerdlow made his entire backstory up so he reinvent himself. I have read many things about the argument Stewart Swerdlow had with Al Bielek at the Global Sciences Congress (GSC), in Daytona, Florida, in February 1999. Back then Swerdlow was a nobody and a wannabe who wanted to be noticed and to make a name for himself on the New Age Circuit. Alfred Bielek, Dr. Matthew Waterman and many other people, all have mentioned on many occasions that Stewart Swerdlow was never involved with the Montauk Project.

    Many people have mentioned the lady called Maryanne Johnston, who was a blind, half German, half Native American social worker who gave a lot of help to Stewart Swerdlow back in 1991 and 1992. Like others have said, Maryanne Johnston was an extraterrestrial experiencer and had received the Language of Hyperspace information which she shared with Stewart Swerdlow. He simply plagiarized her information and pretended he had learned about hyperspace healing whilst on the Montauk Project, which never even existed anyway, as the Bielek Debunked website has overwhelmingly proven. A close friend of Maryanne Johnston was a man called Tom, whose full name was Thomas Jerrick. He had also known Stewart Swerdlow at Expansions. Swerdlow is a well-known plagiarizer and wanted to be part of the Montauk Project fantasy world that Preston Nichols had initiated back in 1992. These days Stewart Swerdlow is walking around using a fake, and rather bad Russian accent to make people believe he has strong Russian Slavic ancestry. Nothing could be further from the truth and Stewart Swerdlow just wants people to believe that he had a great-uncle called Yakob Sverdlov in Soviet Russia, which is also a whopping great lie and can be proven to be a lie as well. The Montauk Project is such a joke, it is completely unbelievable. Maybe someone could produce a docufilm on the information the Bielek Debunked website provides, concerning the Montauk Project disinformation.

  17. Sid the Science Kid Party Ideas are perfect for a super kids birthday party with a scientific theme. There are so many fun games, party favor ideas and fun things to make and experiment with when your kids party theme is Science. stag night




  21. Jason Bateman’s character Nick, who works for a cruel tyrant of a boss played by Kevin Spacey. auditiondateandplace



Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...