strayer pol330 week 1 to week 4 discussions

| September 29, 2018

week 1Week 1 Discussion”Idealism vs. Realism in International Politics” Please respond to the following:Roskin and Berry allude to the tendency toward idealism in international politics before WWII ended in 1945, but the tendency toward realism after that year.Explain what the authors mean by “idealism” and “realism” in international politics.Characterize the differences between the world before 1945 and the world after that year with respect to international relations.Explain the causes of the transition (from idealism to realism).week 2″America in Vietnam” Please respond to the following:The Vietnam War was a counterinsurgency that involved us in guerilla warfare that was similar, in some ways, to what we face in Afghanistan today. But the way the Vietnam War was conducted was considered to be immoral and unjust by many.Describe the prevailing arguments of what constitutes a “just war,” and assess the justice of the Vietnam War in that context.Speculate on how the world would be different today if the U.S. had not become involved in Vietnam.week 3″The Collapse of the Soviet Union” Please respond to the following:Roskin discusses three theories about causes of the collapse of the Soviet Union.Choose one of these theories and explain how it relates to the collapse of the USSR, and assess and justify whether it relates to its internal or external foreign policy.Discuss whether all three of the causes are equally at fault, or whether one, more than the other, is the basic culprit of the demise of the USSR.week 4″The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict” Please respond to the following: For thousands of years, up to the 20th century, the land of Palestine was a homeland for Christians, Jews, and Muslims. In the 20th century, the British got involved in the Middle East in several ways, culminating in the attempt to make Palestine a “Homeland” for European Jews to go to. Based on the e-Activity and Roskin Chapter 8 for this week:Hypothesize on what reasons exist for feeling hopeful about the future of the conflict. If there is no reason to feel hopeful, explain why.Speculate on the probable future of the dispute based on your readings in Roskin and your familiarity with current events.

Get a 30 % discount on an order above $ 5
Use the following coupon code:
Positive SSL