

Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 14:04:31 -0600

Andrew opined:
> Reprocessing text from an SME isn't writing. That's clerical work. Writing
> demands learning about something and then building a document from the
> knowledge you have borrowed, gleaned, or gathered.
definitely writing, and TECHNICAL writing at that!

Having worked from the 'clerical end,' in attempting to transcribe the notes
of a forensic psychiatrist (definitely a subject matter expert), I can tell
you that KNOWING something, and being able to produce an end product that is
understandable to its intended audience (in this case, 'normalhumans'), are
two vastly different things. Making sense of forensic psychiatry requires
more than a nodding acquaintance with the 'jargon,' but other than that, a
agreed-upon outline, good writing skills, the ability to knock out
transitional paragraphs, and a basic knowledge of the intended readership,
are all that's necessary to produce an at least editable product.

Producing the 'gleanings' that technical writers often use as 'reference
material' for their finished documents, is difficult and taxing work and
deserves a better title than 'clerical work,' imo.

I completely agree that technical writers will benefit from picking a niche
and learning the (don't hit me, please!) 'lingua franca' spoken therein.

By the way, an experienced executive secretary earns more per annum than a
newly-minted Phd, if money is an issue. The reason for this is that a good
secretary can COMMUNICATE--can a new PhD?

So there! (Thanks for your ability to do the logic thing, Andrew. My
husband is a philosopher, and he gets me in logic traps all the time! I'm
sharpening (I hope!) my logic tools on this list!)

"Take the Shoes Off Your Mind!"(c)


See and check it out.




Previous by Author: deer-in-headlights syndrome

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads