Friday, September 10, 2010

Time Out On Drinking and Bicycling




Photo: Andrew Nawrocki


  1. I might be wrong, but I believe that Chicago passed a drunk cycling law around 20 years ago.

  2. Drinking and riding seem to be more and more accepted, even promoted, in biking culture, something I consider very sad. So many have been working hard for at least 40 years (some very much longer) to convince the public, lawmakers, police, and other riders that bikes are not toys, and should be taken seriously on the road as a viable means of daily, year-round alternative to cars. Saying or even suggesting that it is OK to drink and ride undermines this effort.

    I'm not talking about a reasonable defense in court, but an attitude that is becoming more pervasive in bike culture. Look through the websites of many manufacturers of bike products (focus on messenger bags) and you will find this. Even one of the biggest and most mainstream manufacturers of messenger bags has a video on their website describing how their strap will keep your bag on even if you are drunk and fall off your bike - and the video starts with the presenter drinking a beer. That's no way to promote an industry, or bicycling as a way of life.

  3. There's no way in hell riding a bike drunk should get you a DUI.

    I'd rather have 10 drunk cyclists ride right toward me than be anywhere near a single drunk car driver.

    It's common sense people.

  4. In response to the last comment: so if a drunk cyclist causes an accident involving motor vehicles which result in serious injury or death, that is OK? Or less 'bad' than a driver causing the same? Or a drunk cyclist hits a pedestrian and they fall and die from a head injury that is somehow more excusable than the same result caused by a driver? I'm not out to pick on cyclists, I am one myself, but we are not immune from the consequences of our actions.

  5. there are a couple of points to make why it should be considered a lesser crime to ride a bicycle drunk than a car. first you do not need a license to ride a bike, so it can not be subject to the same restrictions(driving is a privilege not a right). second there is a far greater ability to cause serious injury and damage with a car than with a bike, the person at greatest risk bicycling drunk is the bicyclist.

    clearly it should be avoided and should not be supported, but there should be a distinction in the law.

  6. Each state is different as it pertains to the law ... I found this blog post about ND law as it relates to DUI on a Bicycle

    Bicycle DUI

  7. I'm a cyclist and a driver. I want the laws to be fair, and I try to promote a safe cycling environment. There is a swath of bicycling culture that revels in drinking and bashing drivers, and screams at every outrage that places any level of responsibility on them. Too many of them are just as aggressive toward pedestrians as they are toward drivers. These people hurt the cause of safe cycling, and harm efforts to elevate cyclists to having safe and full rights of passage on roads.

    Clearly cyclists are less likely to cause harm riding drunk than auto drivers, but bikes are still riding on the roadway which in my mind, raises their level responsibility. A drunk pedestrian could cause an accident as well, but pedestrians are not primarily in the street. Cyclists have a greater level of responsibility and should be held accountable for riding drunk.


Search This Blog