Days of Rage









After Sam Melville, bombings were A Thing.

























And then they started bombing.





But none of it mattered. Nobody cared.







































Sadly, this is not on YouTube.

























I know. You’re thinking, “Wait, what?”








But what about that NWLF thing?









Look, I told you today’s installment gets crazy.






Look, I told you this story gets crazy.




























I’m not kidding.



I’m still not kidding.







I’m still not kidding.





Yeah. It gets crazier.






All of that is not yet the crazy part.

























The next day, he does it again.


That’s kind of what it’s like.









Like: what kind of people will do this stuff?




  1. cold Civil War
  2. targeted political violence, mostly short of murder
  3. political violence with murder as the default
  4. Civil War II




It’s horseshit.













And I’m Jewish.

Lemme tell you a true story.


“What’s the penalty for being late?”


“What’s the penalty for rebellion?”


“Well — we’re late.”

And that’s the story of the Dazexiang Uprising.


























  2. weaponize Institutions against Righties, when possible
















In the 70s, radicals were basically limited to 3 options:

  3. robbing banks (everyone else).















The hard Left will use the tactics it’s already using.




The press is a Lefty weapon and a Righty target.



Effective Lefty violence will be by capable, fully operating cells.










They were known as Los Pepes.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

235 Responses to Days of Rage

  1. Anonymous Coward says:

    Typos: “Dorne”, “Burrough”. Fix and delete this comment 🙂


  2. Andrew says:

    Does the book cover AIM as well? They weren’t bombers from what I recall, but they had no shortage of shootouts with police. And Malheur-style acquittals for some of the leaders.


  3. a scruffian says:

    I’m curious. ‘Davidzhines’ is not listed on the authors page of this blog, and this is the only post under that name. It reads like the work of ‘Mencius Moldbug’. (If not, disciple davidzhines is emulating him very well indeed.) But why the lack of explanation? Is this a cross-post from somewhere I’m not aware of? (Sorry if this is obvious to everyone else, but I don’t follow the NRx scene so I wouldn’t know.)


  4. Pingback: Days of Rage

  5. Anonymous says:

    This doesn’t read like Mencius Moldbug because it’s clear, readable and makes sense, unlike Moldbug’s jargon-infested walls of text. It was taken from the Twitter and Storify of a guy named David Hines (@hradzka on twitter), who presumably wrote it.


  6. Disposable Account says:

    So I was linked this from another blog, and while I agree with the essential thrust of your post I think that you are seriously underestimating the potential effectiveness of right-wing violence.

    Maybe it’s just the “Bitter old Vet” or “Tactical Deathbeast” in me but my own experience has been that being “organized & prepared for violence” paradoxically makes violence less likely, as the actual act of organizing and preparing often forces one to confront the sobering reality of it. Fact is that I have given serious thought to what an effective domestic insurrection would look like, and that is precisely why I don’t want to go down that road.

    Timothy McVeigh would consider the Weather Underground “cute”.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. MacComie says:

    What do you mean by National Divorce? A mutual secession of left and right-wing states?

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Just4Lulz says:


    There are obvious problems with you present worldview as evidenced by some of the following:

    1. It is the right that has suddenly become enamored with anti-Western Russian propaganda primarily as of late. This is new in the US and coincides with the rise of Trump, but it’s a pattern Russia has been following.

    2. The “right” such as it is, is highly organized through networks of think tanks, PACs, state legislatures, and various activist groups. See the TEA party groups, religious right, and so on, and they do perpetrate violence, and witness the mainstreaming of anti-abortion groups that count terrorists among their leadership. These groups are also well funded.

    3. The divorce premise has problems in that a lot of this false left/right dichotomy is partly bases on a difference in values between urban, suburban and rural citizens, I seriously don’t see how a “divorce” in which most of the major cities split off from the rest of the Union.

    4. The non-violent protesters are just that. Their tactic is non-violent resistance. Black bloc anarchists and other elements–it is true–attempt to use these events as cover for their own mischief, but pretending they are affiliated in any way other than they are just used for cover by violent elements is–at best–largely self-deception.

    5. The willing abandonment of facts is more mainstreamed among the 20+% of the electorate that calls themselves “right”. Global Warming denial, they co-opted vaccine denialism from the left, birtherism, chemtrails, and Trump just issued a press pass to the dumbest man on the internet, Jim Hoft, apparently who has written such gems as “Obama building a death star”. Alex Jones, and half the crazy crap that has been mainstreamed on Fox News, alone, discredits the idea that a detachment for reality is a left-wing thing, and the whole Jill Stein nuttiness of the left is–at best–marginalized by the mainstream Western political establishment and most folks that would embrace labels like “liberal” or “progressive”.

    I am not saying extremism does not exist on the left: there are militant animal rights folks, there were folks calling for “a revolution” on the left too, but sovereign citizens have ranked “top cop killers” as a group for some time now.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Erik says:

      Your evidence is unconvincing.

      Point 1 is a red herring. I disagree that “[i]t is the right that has suddenly become enamored with anti-Western Russian propaganda”, but even stipulating it for the sake of argument, you haven’t shown how this is a problem for the post.

      Point 2 is a goalpost shift. David Hines talks about how the hard Left has institutions willing to back their terrorists. You respond that the [no-modifier] Right has institutions [sentence stop]. Moreover, there’s a deceptive sleight of hand between “anti-abortion” and “terrorists”. Possibly this was unintentional, but I think it’s still worth noting as a counterpoint that the Left rage terrorists in this post alone murdered more people than there have been murders by Right anti-abortion terrorists in the entire history of the United States.

      Point 3, if anything, should only reinforce Hines’s worldview. He says a lot of thought would have to go into a national divorce, requiring negotiated settlement, and being difficult enough that it probably won’t happen; you bring up an item that would require a lot of thought to resolve and is reason to believe national divorce might not happen.

      Point 4 could use some references if you don’t want me dismissing it as baseless assertion piled on tautology. Hines has given multiple specific examples of peaceful institutions running cover for violent terrorists. You’re the self-deceiving one if you try to handwave away this entire category of things as not happening.

      Point 5 sounds like a fish not knowing what water is. The Left has built a colossal infrastructure on the willing abandonment of the fact of racial differences, to name one example. Compared to this, chemtrails are an utterly irrelevant distraction on a level with Time Cube Guy. Your ranking of “top cop killers” also smells of extremely selective lumping, splitting, group denialism, and cherrypicked statistics from a very small sample size. Or to put it in perspective: more people die from botched circumcisions than “cop killers” every year.

      Liked by 5 people

    • jsolbakken says:

      The difference between Left and Right is that the Right wing organizations you mention have not been truly weaponized for violence the way that the Lefties have been. The anti-abortion violence has been the work of lone wolf individuals and sincerely condemned by the vast majority of members and supporters of anti-abortion organizations. But, pity the poor dumb Lefty idiots if they succeed in goading the Right to weaponize itself.

      Liked by 3 people

    • Harold Kerr says:

      Name a single pro–life organization with a terrorist on its board. Name a single pro–life terrorist with a professor’s chair at a Christian university, or even a syndicated column.

      Liked by 4 people

    • Smokey says:


      To deconstruct your belief system:

      1. The Left promotes your fake news talking point, not conservatives (who have never trusted the erstwhile Soviets).

      2. Pure projection (imputing your own faults onto others). For every violent act by one deranged individual on the right, there are many hundreds of organized acts of violence by the Left.

      From the article: “Sustained political violence is dependent on the willing cooperation of admirers and accomplices. The Left has these. The Right does not.” True dat.

      3. Read the Constitution. And some American antebellum history wouldn’t hurt.

      4. Violent protesters always trump the non- or less-violent. See: Stalin v Lenin. It’s just Gresham’s Law applied to politics: the bad always drive out the good.

      5. Cherry-picking a few individuals and implying that “the right” endorses every example you give is disingenuous. It’s no different than saying, “David Duke supports Trump!” So what? 99% of Trump supporters reject that bogus comparison. But since that’s the best argument you have, you use it.

      However, your first example, “global warming denial”, is absurd. Name one scientist who disputes “global warming”. Name just one. You can’t, therefore your point #5 fails.

      The planet has been warming for hundreds of years—naturally—since the end of the Little Ice Age. But that natural warming has not accelerated, despite a 40%+ rise in the harmless trace gas CO2. If CO2 caused any measurable warming, an acceleration in global warming would have been measured by now. But the steady centuries-long rise in warming has not accelerated. In fact, global warming recently stopped for almost twenty years, while CO2 continues to rise (due mostly to China). CO2 has been 20X higher in the past, without ever triggering runaway global warming (or any global warming, for that matter). And CO2 is essential to life on earth; under ≈150 ppm, plant life begins to die. We are still very near the low end of atmospheric CO2, and even if it doubled from here (unlikely), we would still be near the low end.

      The “climate change” scare is a scientifically debunked false alarm. It is a scare intended to pave the way for a carbon tax. But no tax can change global temperatures by even 0.000001ºC. It’s just more big government, with a concomitant growth in the nameless, faceless, and unaccountable army of federal bureaucrats—from a tax that would be every government’s wet dream since governments began: taxing the air we breathe.


      I remember just about all of the events reported in this article (I’m 68). But the media has buried them almost completely since then. Kids edumacated by the gov’t .edu factories aren’t taught anything worthwhile any more, like American History, Civics, the Constitution, etc.

      So thanx for the article. Don’t let this fall down the memory hole!


    • Donna says:

      Just4Lulz: I could not have said it better myself!


      • jsolbakken says:

        I’ve been a rabid anti-communist since I found out what communism was back in the early 1960’s. It was never Russia or the Russians that I opposed, it was the bullshit of communism and its tyrannical idiocy. The reason us rabid anti-communists are sweet on Putin and the Russians now is because we respect and appreciate the NATIONALISM they are pursuing, and we like and appreciate even the possibility that they are slowly but surely turning away from the dumbass communism and freeing their minds and hearts from its tyrannical idiocy. I think Russia is becoming a normal country with a normal view of its national interests instead of being devoted to worldwide communist revolution. Could be wrong, but why would we trust and believe people like you who still openly support communism?

        Liked by 1 person

    • X says:

      Jew alert.


  9. Pingback: Jim Hines and the narrative. | Dark Brightness

  10. Doc Sithicus says:

    I’d rather have Civil War 2 rather sooner than later. Why? I’ve still got about 10 good years left in me and don’t want to go through this shit when I’m old and useless. Second reason – I’d gladly kill, murder and commit genocide so that my children and their children don’t have to. I’d gladly go to my grave with blood stained hands if this will give my kids future and chance for a good life.

    Liked by 4 people

    • jsolbakken says:

      ” I’d gladly go to my grave with blood stained hands if this will give my kids future and chance for a good life.” Because you are pro-life and the Left is pro-death. God said, “All who hate Me love death.”
      Proverbs 8:36 But he that sinneth against me wrongeth his own soul: all they that hate me LOVE DEATH.
      Instead, the good guys choose life, even if it involves hurting those who love death so much. Is it wrong to give people what they love and want?

      Liked by 1 person

    • Daniel says:

      Can’t tell if this comment is for right wing death squads or left wing death squads.


      • jsolbakken says:

        The reference to kids and their future indicates clearly that this commenter is referring to “Right Wing” death squad activity, as opposed to “Left Wing.” Even if a Left Winger has kids, they don’t give a rat’s behind about their future.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Possibly both, actually. Strange thing overlooked in this assessment, the dems/left banked it all on their ‘creations’ of those universities. For those not a part of the institution, they appear wholly repulsive and offputting. Both New and Old Black Panthers eventually backed Trump. Why? Well, they may not have all the knowledge Burroughs and Hines do, but they had an inkling they had to “get off the plantation”
        Black Lives Matter sounds MUCH more feel-good and middle-friendly than “Panthers,” a predatory animal. Some damn smart-ass saw this shift happening eventually and already was building a replacement for it. The panthers too, started ‘independently grassroots.’ and were separate from the uni-backed organisations.
        But now, a movement founded by a student of Angela Davis, Alicia Garza, and now directly headed by her, has propelled forwards into the mainstream consciousness. And this Womens’ March nonsense is part of inverting what had to be done back then. With the new radical black movement all about converting white fencesitters, and since there’s a pre-disposition already there to worship black leadership even if they’ve shown no qualities of such (basically Obama’s entire campaign) then it’s now easy as hell to rope all the broadly scattered white feminist groups under the BLM banner. And as a bonus thanks to its leadership, it won’t go ‘off course’ like the panthers. There is a DIRECT line from BLM straight into the universities, going both ways now even with DeRay McKeeson becoming a ‘tenured professor’ who teaches that ‘looting isn’t stealing, because they already stole your money to pay for that, you’re just reclaiming what’s yours’

        So, the old Left Wing Death Squads got discarded by their children, and wound up thrown in with the rest of the ‘nazis’ by simple virtue of not adapting to new “radical human rights precepts” fast enough. Hence the drive to “Get off the plantation.”
        It’s a matter of noticing they ‘can’t trust Trump, but these stupid motherfuckers trying to get us killed!”
        I suspect before Malcolm X was killed it was actually going this way back then too, considering he began allowing George Lincoln Rockwell into his rallies.
        Deep State saw what was about to transpire and ‘activated their assets’ within both organisations to prevent any sort of alliance.
        BM4B has already had to deal with its share of bombings as well having been branded traitors, “mysteriously” unreported by the media.


    • Donna says:

      It won’t give your kids a chance for a good life or a decent, livable future. It will only destroy the, formerly, United States of America and allow the foreign powers and interests to finally tear us apart for good and pick our bones, as they have been trying to do since the beginning of our country. Get a clue. Haven’t some people learned anything from the Civil War?? Violence and war are never the answer. They solve nothing, except to beget more violence. If you are a Christian, the New Testament and gospels have a lot to say about this. I’d suggest you give them a read, if you are so inclined, before you “gladly kill, murder and commit genocide” so that your “children don’t have to”. Oh, but they will. This shit NEVER ends! Just take a look at the Middle East.


    • Donna says:

      United we Stand; Divided we Fall.


      • Donna says:

        Erik: Since there is no ‘Reply’ button on the last 2 comments you left, directed to both me and Enkiv2, I will reply here. No, I do not want to amend my original statement. The Cato Institute has changed it’s tune, recently, as you have noted. This is in marked contrast to their previous, long-standing positions over the years, which are firmly on the right, hard right, I would say. I would suppose this is because David Koch, the founder of the Cato Institute and their top funder, was forced to resign from the board in the past year or so because of the controversy over his massive influence over the think tank, which was discrediting it. I’m not sure what your point was regarding AEI being founded in 1938 and the Heritage Foundation in 1973. Are you saying there were no right-wing think tanks or institutions, before 1980? I suppose that comment relates to Enkiv2’s statement that you quoted. There have been right-wing institutions around for a very long time, both here and abroad. However, there has been a massive proliferation of them in the U.S. since the 1980s (see the Powell memo) and they all seem to have Orwellian names that stand for the opposite of what they are named. Your comment “it looks more like a list of miscellaneous institutions built by the not-hard-left since approximately forever” makes no sense to me, whatsoever. Obviously, we disagree on what constitutes right-wing, right, and/or hard right (as well as the so-called “left”). That’s not surprising, because these terms, in the American lexicon today, have become virtually meaningless and serve to confuse and obfuscate the issues much more than they illuminate anything. If I was interested in continuing this conversation, I would insist on defining our terms, first. Otherwise, any conversation or debate about this topic is useless. Having said that, it should be clear that only discussions/debates about real issues matter. If you are interested in that, we might have something to talk about. Otherwise, I am not interested and have better things to do with my time.
        Also, this comment section does not operate in a straightforward manner. Reply buttons are not consistently displayed. Replies to comments end up in weird places and are not linked to the original commenter by name. I cannot even find the original comment I was replying to on this thread! It seems to have disappeared. What gives? Also, there seems to be a troll problem….moderation??


      • Donna says:

        Erik: I’m replying to my own comment because there is, again, no Reply button on your comment. The passage from Luke that you cite above, Luke 19:27, is taken out of context. It is a parable of a ‘certain man of noble birth’ which starts at Luke 19:11. He is called “Lord” in the passage by his subjects. This reference to the “Lord” is not to Jesus, but to this noble man. “But as for these mine enemies who would not have me reign over them – bring them hither and slaughter them before me”. This is NOT Jesus advocating violence. It is a story about a noble (rich) man. It is a parable. It teaches a lesson. Like the parable of the mustard seed, it is not to be taken literally. If you read on and place it within it’s proper context, you will understand what it means. In my interpretation, Jesus was rejecting this ancient mindset that was commonly accepted in the Old Testament and historically, in general. Jesus brought a New Testament. It seems that either you do not understand this interpretation, or that you reject it. Either way, it is your prerogative and your choice. That is why we have, and must have, freedom of religion. I don’t accept your implied interpretation taken totally out of context. And, apparently, you do not accept mine. But, you know, that’s O.K. with me!


  11. Pingback: Antennae of the Race: Understanding Modernist and Contemporary art | Samuel Stevens

  12. Pingback: Bryan Burrough’s Days of Rage – The Maverick Mathologist

  13. Sam J. says:

    One option that David Hines doesn’t mention to solve this problem. Expel the Jews. If you’ll notice the Jews are all over all these extremest movements. They actively push these extremist movements. Push to make them more radical. For all I know they could be the ones pushing the whole Civil War II momentum, right David? The Jews push and fund the left disruption while they goad the right to,”not take this anymore”, while they sit back and get their jollies in the carnage. A good example is the Ukrainian civil war. Both sides in the war are run by Jews. The shootings that started the war were supposedly protesters being shot by the police and protestors shooting at the police. We now know that the bullets came from the same weapon. It’s just the same old shit. Jews set us up and watch while we kill each other.

    The Jews have been thrown out of every single country that they’ve been to in any numbers. Wonder why?

    Liked by 1 person

    • empreb says:

      He said he was a jew…. IE /pol/ is always right. ALWAYS.


    • Anon says:

      YOU are the reason the right can’t organize


    • Emerich says:

      Sam J, haven’t you heard? The jews are just like you and me — only more so.


      • Sam J. says:

        You got it backwards. They are just like you and me but “less” so. They’re a tribe of psychopaths. They have little to no empathy for other humans. A large amount of their population is like this. After all who else has a religion that says all people not Jewish are not human, all their property belongs to the Jews and they should all be the Jews slaves. If that’s not a psychopathic religion I don’t know what is. Same with their treatment of people once they gain political control over them, Persia(Purim, ring a bell), the Canaanites, Spanish after Jews betrayed them to the Muslims(twice in Spain counting the Spanish Civil War), Germans, the really huge slaughters in the Ukraine and Russia, Armenian Genocide, Palestinians, the Americans killed on 9-11 and I could go on with more fine grained facts but you get the idea.


      • jsolbakken says:

        It was God who told the Israelites that gentiles were unchosen and unsaved. What the Israelites didn’t get was that it was only for the time being, a temporary situation which would be adjusted when the Messiah, the Son of God, came to do His work of redemption for all mankind, not for the Jew only, but also for the gentile. The Jews didn’t accept the change when Jesus tried to teach them that in Him there was no Jew or Greek, free or bond, rich or poor, male or female, no more barbarians and Scythians on the outside looking in. But even that blindness is God’s work, to serve God’s mysterious historical purposes. The Jews are brothers in the election, but for the time being they are enemies of the gospel. The Jews are so much enemies of the gospel that, I believe, they created a Doomsday Weapon called “Islam” for the purpose of destroying the gospel once and for all, but like all Doomsday Weapons it is running wild and is destroying everything in its path. The Jews are kind of like Doctor Frankenstein and his monster. Doctor Frankenstein wasn’t such a bad guy, really, but his monster was very dangerous and it killed people.


      • Sam J. says:

        jsolbakken,”It was God who told the Israelites that gentiles were unchosen and unsaved…”

        No it wasn’t god. It was a demon. One of the group of Christians that believed this was the Carthars. They believed that the Jews worshiped a demon and satan. The Carthars believed,”…The good God was the God of the New Testament and the creator of the spiritual realm, contrasted with the evil Old Testament God—the creator of the physical world whom many Cathars, and particularly their persecutors, identified as Satan….”. Of course the Catholic church came and killed every Man, Women and Child in the Cathars. It’s where the phrase,”Kill them all, God will know his own”, came from.

        If a people, the Jews, act in such a way as to be thrown out of every single country that they’ve ever gone to in any appreciable numbers over thousands of years, what does that say about those people? What does it say about their behavior?

        Maybe it’s just everyone else that’s the problem and the Jews are angels.


      • jsolbakken says:

        You give your self away when you refer to God with a small “g.”
        But you are correct that the Jews have had problems with worshipping demons from ancient days, but because they were copying the gentiles instead of obeying God. Jews are enemies of the gospel today, but they are still brothers in the elections of God and when they see Yeshua Ha Mashiach come back in glory they will look on Him whom they have pierced and turn back to their God and be restored, grafted back in to their own natural family tree.
        Now, until that day comes I agree that Jews that support communism and Islam and other wicked totalitarian perversion need to be resisted. Same goes for non-Jews who support such evil things.
        Just like the ancient Israelites who went after Molech and Ashtoreth, modern Israelites too often follow after communism and Islam, both being hammers with which they hope to smash Christianity with.

        Zechariah 12:


      • Sam J. says:

        “…The Jews are so much enemies of the gospel that, I believe, they created a Doomsday Weapon called “Islam”…”

        I think you very well might be correct on this. It wouldn’t surprise me. Psychopaths always do stupid stuff like this.


      • jsolbakken says:

        My study of history has made me strongly suppose that Talmudic Jews wrote the Koran to create Islam so that it would oppose Christianity. The Jews of the 7th century were quite alarmed at the spread of Christianity and were in a panic to oppose it.
        The difference with me is that I do not hate the Jews for this. I recognize the danger, and am willing to oppose them, but I go by what the Bible says about it. Paul wrote in his epistle to the Romans that God hath not cast away His people, but hath let them be blinded for a time until the time of the gentiles is fulfilled, then they get grafted back in to God’s family tree where they belong, brothers once again, hallelujah, praise God. Romans 11:28 “28 As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers’ sakes.
        29 For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance.


      • Sam J. says:

        “…The difference with me is that I do not hate the Jews for this. I recognize the danger, and am willing to oppose them…”

        You suppose that anybody who opposes the Jews are filled with hate or that’s what the Jews say. You of course defer to the Jews and their demon influenced Talmud. There’s another quite plausible scenario. Remember Trumps fable about the snake.

        You go play with the snakes. I don’t want to have anything to do with them I know what they are.

        You’re full of forgiveness for those that never forgive. In the immortal words of that great philosopher Gomer Pyle,” Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me”.


      • jsolbakken says:

        Having an eschatological perspective on the Jews is not the same as deferring to them. I have no illusions about them being my friends where the gospel of Jesus Christ is concerned. I understand perfectly well that they hate Jesus Christ and want to destroy Christianity and I’ve come to believe, as I previously stated, that certain Jews created Islam as a Doomsday Weapon to destroy Christianity from off the face of the earth. Islam is a lot like the Doomsday Machine on the original Star Trek episode, where they had to explode a star ship inside of it in order to disable it. But the fact of the matter is that the Bible says they are blinded in part until the day of their redemption comes. And it is also written that IF the Jews had known that they were murdering the Son of God, they wouldn’t have done it. They did it because they were blind to the truth, not because they knowingly hated the truth. It seems that to God there is a spiritual difference in being blind and willfully opposing the truth when you know it to be the truth.


      • Sam J. says:

        jsolbakken ,”…You give your self away when you refer to God with a small “g.”…”

        You suppose I do but you don’t understand. Jesus Christ is the Son of God. The Jews worship a god. Satan. If you follow the teachings of gods you are worshiping Satan. The Talmud is the words of demons.


      • jsolbakken says:

        OK. Sorry. I jumped to the wrong contusions when I saw the annoying use of the small “g” for God.


      • X says:

        Sam nails it.


      • X says:

        We don’t give two short and curlies what (((Jesus))) or (((Paul))) said.

        We WILL have white nations in Europe and North America.


    • X says:

      Yes. I noticed. So have 300 million of our brothers in Europe and North America.


  14. David R. Graham says:

    I read through the whole essay. I experience the feelings motivating it. I wrote a brief essay titled Revolution Refounding Reformation. It treats of the same feelings and comes out with a time-line including but extending the one above:


  15. Excellent. Good information here. Moldbug introduced the theory (from De Jouvenel) that the structure is High (elite, institutional left) and low (Blacks, Mexicans, Muslims and students) against Middle (conservative middle class.)

    I’m not optimistic either.


    • jsolbakken says:

      The John Birch Society called it “Pressure from above plus pressure from below” creating the vise like crushing of the liberty of the normal people caught in the middle.


      • Oh? They saw this pattern too?

        I just saw an article on Anti-Fascism in the Nation calling for violence.

        Liked by 1 person

      • jsolbakken says:

        Yes, the John Birch Society needs to be thanked for carrying the torch of truth through the darkest days when there was no other light. When the whole world was against them they stood strong for what they believed to be true, which is now slowly becoming, I hope and pray at least, common knowledge, that there is a cabal of rich and powerful people who use their money and power to influence not only government policy but government structure itself to make it more amenable to their centralized control over the whole world. This vast global conspiracy, or if you don’t like the word “conspiracy,” use my preferred neologism “cahootancy,” is what is behind all the Globalism and push for world government. When people resist my assertion that the richest and most powerful people manipulate the rest of the world for their own personal benefit, I ask them, “so, you think that the richest and most powerful people in the world just let the chips fall where they may? They just let the cookies crumble as they will? They just the mop flop any which way? They aren’t the types of people who get their little duckies all in neat little rows?”


  16. Anonymous says:

    I regret ever posting that goddamn frog. It was about being a lonely, unhealthy weirdo, not a goddamn revolutionary or whatever the fuck.

    Everything I try to do turns straight to shit.


    • Didn’t you read the article? That’s exactly what revolutionaries are trying to do too!
      Should write yourself a book about becoming the “accidental revolutionary the internet and America needed” or something. At least you’ll get a couple bucks out of it!
      I guess it could be worse, Nicki Minaj popularising it in the first place outside of tumblr/chans could have gone to some really strange places if /pol/ hadn’t picked it back up.


    • ameizing says:

      >you will never post a silly frog meme without it turning into a far right icon


  17. Oldhippie says:

    Interesting. You have picked up some of the pieces. Myself I started to drift out of SDS when martial arts training became obligatory. When weapons training was required that was the end for me. What sent me away was not so much the notion of using a gun for a political end as that the providers of the guns were people who until five minutes previous could not fundraise a nickel bag for a party. Suddenly they had weapons, unlimited weapons, nice weapons, and an infinite supply of ammunition for training purposes. If they burned out an M60 by running it too hot there was another M60 ready to go. And a little farm in Wisconsin to use as a training facility. All the farmers in the vicinity could and did hear the M60 and the BAR, so could the local police, somehow in spite of every local looking daggers at the hippies when they passed through town there was no problem ever. Someone had arranged all this and it was not the Episcopal Church. Of course the two honchos who ran our chapter were both later exposed as pedophiles and FBI.

    Yes it is true Cathy Wilkerson got off light. Most Weathermen did hard time. The two who conspicuously, very conspicuously, got off scotfree were Dohrn and Ayers. Those two were also the absolute bedrock core of the Action Faction. That is what they called themselves. Whenever anyone wavered they were there. They were the maximum leaders and they were the ones always pushing for guns and bombs and the Wargasm. Both up to their eyeballs in the Greenwich townhouse bombing in the photo above and they admit to it. Let me tell you about young Bernardine. She was a strikingly attractive woman. Beautiful clear olive skin. Busty and she showed it off all the time. And usually in high black boots. Not working class engineer boots, shiny black fetish gear. Have you seen the Weather movie? Through the entire “underground” period she wore that gear. They were “underground” on the Upper West Side, in the Columbia University neighborhood, where lots and lots of people knew who they were. And miraculously the FBI could not find them.

    Yes the 60s and 70s were completely crazy. Those who were not there cannot easily imagine it. And the big sponsor of the madness was not the NYT or the City of New York or the Episcopal Church.


    • Sam J. says:

      That’s really interesting.


    • Anonymous says:

      Could you drop more information on the FBI-Pedo connection and the big sponsor?


      • Oldhippie says:

        Chairman Bob Avakian claimed to be the one supplying the guns. Look him up. Find one word by him or about him that passes the laugh test.

        Again, focus on Ayers and Dohrn. The leaders and the only ones to entirely escape prosecution.

        AFAIK the pederasty was feeelance. The sort of characters who would want undercover work in COINTELPRO and it’s many cognates would tend to be a bit off. And they got a get out of jail free card.


      • Sam J. says:

        I look up this Bob Avakian fellow and get. “Hillary Floats Chairman Bob Avakian as Supreme Court Nominee”. WOW. I never heard of him. These people are all in groups that come up over and over. I think they could be stopped if anyone cared to.

        I find it hard to believe they’re firing off machine guns and no investigates. Seems at least the local Sheriff would find out if they were legal. So what does that mean? I don’t know. Why would the deep State want to fund radicals? I don’t know. That most of these people are Jews is interesting in itself. The did this sort of thing in Russia and killed 60 million???(according to Solzhenitsyn) people when they took over. These are not nice people.


      • Sam J. says:

        @oldhippy and anonymous. You ever heard of the Finders? Lots of these type groups around. Children of God. Many others.

        These people need to be in jail. I’m fairly hopeful as I look at the actions of people that are following the pizzagate crime, if it is one. It wouldn’t look like much except there’s been so damn many of these. I’m hoping that people will start getting enthusiastic about being amateur investigators. People like oldhippie and lots of others who saw stuff but decided not to bring it to notice could provide valuable information and eventually the cops would HAVE to do something. There’s only so much they can bury and the filth is piling up, HIGH. They’re kind of stuck. If they have to censor the whole internet all the little girls whacking away at their phones would have a fuckin cow. They would have to wait for censors to clear their tweets. Can you imagine the uproar. Any site who censors is immediately bypassed to one that doesn’t and new services like Maidsafe are distributed storage servers, like huge internet information bit-torrents, so they can’t be censored at all.

        I want to state again that the above article is an attempt to get the Right to attack the Left by egging them on and telling them,”Wow they got away with it”. I say let’s box them ALL in and jail them all.


      • James K. says:

        The site that has the article “Hillary Floats Chairman Bob Avakian as Supreme Court Nominee” also has such articles as “Kim Jong-un Throws Hat in the Ring for Republican Nomination,” “Orcs Declare They Are Anarcho-Capitalists, Still Bummed Ron Paul Lost,” and “Jennifer Lawrence Revealed as Former Member of Red Army Faction.” It seems to be a mixture of third-rate Alex Jones, third-rate Onion, and nonsensical headlines created just for clickbait. So you don’t have to worry about that one.


      • Sam J. says:

        James K. says,”…The site that has the article “Hillary Floats Chairman Bob Avakian as Supreme Court Nominee” also has such articles as “Kim Jong-un Throws Hat in the Ring for Republican Nomination,” …”

        Oops my bad. I just searched and that’s what came up. I’ll have to be more careful. There’s a lot more of this lately. The volume of stuff like this is getting much higher. I think deep state has an A.I. furiously typing this stuff up and posting it all over.


    • bjdubbs says:

      That’s interesting. The same is true of many of the other radicals, they were hiding in plain sight. For instance, Kathy Boudin, who was living at the townhouse that exploded and who crawled out of the wreckage, didn’t try very hard to elude authorities:

      “In the days following the explosion, Kathy rode the subway and saw her photograph and headlines on other people newspapers. She later told an interviewer, “One of the amazing things was knowing how hard the authorities were searching for us and yet they weren’t able to find us.”

      But it shouldn’t have been hard to figure out. Kathy was literally living with her parents a few blocks from the explosion.

      “At 8 PM FBI agents arrived at the Boudin home. Jean [Kathy’s mother] shooed her daughter and Cathlyn [Wilkerson] quietly upstairs. She harshly informed the two men that she was busy, then slammed the door.”

      OK then, no need to ask further questions. The quotes are from Family Circle: The Boudins and the Aristocracy of the Left.


      • Oldhippie says:

        Do you know what Boudin looks like? Quite impossible for her to hide or disguise. “…how hard the authorities were searching for us…” The authorities always knew exactly where they were and what they were doing and were quite pleased with the situation.

        Bureaucracies are generally clumsy and incompetent. No suggestion from me that the government is omniscient. They can and will overlook what is right in front of their noses. In this case the government was in full control. The bulk of the active membership of SDS (that would be members, not campus hangers-on) were always government workers. In the aftermath of SDS the situation was even more extreme. Organizations as RCP or PL-SDS had no existence at all outside of government.


      • Sam J. says:

        “…In the aftermath of SDS the situation was even more extreme. Organizations as RCP or PL-SDS had no existence at all outside of government….”

        That made me laugh. They’re like the Klan, nine FBI informants and one guy who hates Blacks, cause his Sister got raped by them, who they recruited on the internet.


    • Actually the Episcopal Church is still a big part of it. But you have to think to yourself about where their people were going and why they’d defend the FALN if they weren’t joining it themselves. Though the fastest and quickest route is…Who was our first Episcopalian President? And what office did he hold immediately before then?

      If not this president, then I hope one later will eventually declassify the entirety of CIA documentation to draw solid lines between all this as opposed to just guesswork. But the movement of that family, and their supposed “bitter rivals from Mena, Arkansas” is mightily suspicious indeed. And I mean an authentic declassification, not having all but 3 words in an entire document blacked out!

      It’s kind of amusing in a maudlin way how much of this information I encountered already…when looking up what Clinton was doing in South America. It’s practically common knowledge what Castro was doing and how he was messing with the general American public, and how he had essentially been the ‘ghost funder’ for the more violent groups. Even the lowliest crop-picker looks upon you with shock and horror realising how little Americans and Europeans were actually aware of this.
      In a way America’s paranoia of Castro is also what causes radicalism in reverse through the rest of South America. They believe every other populist leader that arises could not only become another Castro, but as impossible to kill as he was. So they knocked over legitimately good governments and turned them into drug cartel hells. Somewhere along the line, around the time the Clintons were brought in, it went from knocking over these governments from paranoia, to knocking them over for profit, and being complicit in the drug trade. The most recent debacle, deposing Manuel Zelaya, was a little of both. The CIA has been a cartel all itself really, at least since the 70s, stealing suspicious characters under investigation from under the DEA and FBI frequently, then releasing them free and clear.

      Every now and then small bits and pieces hit the mainstream.
      But the full extent remains largely hidden and piecemealed.

      Also, it’s an interesting ploy that they came up with early on…Hiring nazis to “hunt communists” to look good to the American people for stopping the spread of communism, all the while importing its most important elements into the US itself. One of Davis’ professors even is suspected of being one of these early assets, Max (((Horkheimer)))


      • Donna says:

        I think you are on to something, deutschefolkhero. I have read a lot about this over the years. And the president you are referring to, I believe, was CIA director before becoming president – something that was unheard of, before then, and should never have happened. A lot of mischief happened then and continues. Things weren’t good before, but it has been all downhill since then, a veritable ‘race to the bottom’.


    • Sam J. says:

      I read somewhere that whoever was calling for the most violence was who Bernardine latched onto and fucked silly. No violence, no pussy. Maybe they need to put that on a tee shit. Can’t remember where. Book maybe.


    • spindlitis says:

      The big reason Dohrn and Ayres got off is money. Their parents were rich. I think this point started to sink in to the radicals with less wealthy parents.

      Also a lot of the anger was fueled by the draft and the Vietnam War. It’s easier to support the violence if you think you’re going to Nam. I don’t see anything to fund that anger today.


    • Donna says:

      Thank you for your candor, Oldhippie. Yes, the 60s and 70s were completely crazy…lots of operatives all around doing very nefarious things. Since then we have seen many scandals come to light about these horrendous pedofile rings and each one of them has had some kind of FBI/police involvement to protect them and cover it up; often times, in addition to the involvement of church officials, catholic priests, as well as other “religious” leaders, powerful politicians and businessmen, and people running various “charitable” organizations (like The Second Mile, in the infamous Penn State case in Pennsylvania, where, as of yet, only Jerry Sandusky has been prosecuted, convicted and incarcerated. They brought in previous FBI director Louis Freeh for that ‘investigation’.). Nobody wants to turn over any more of those rocks, though!


    • X says:

      The Jews.


  18. Joel Salomon says:

    Thanks; you’ve gone and made Tom Kratman, with his own predictions of CWII, sound like Pollyanna.

    Liked by 1 person

  19. Pingback: Punching Nazis Is the First Refuge of the Incompetent | Refutation & Overthrow...

  20. Emerich says:

    I read the whole article not just because it was inherently interesting–I already knew about the book from book reviews–but because it was well written. Hines writes well, and also added some good insights and analysis of his own. Certainly hope the pessimistic note it ends on is a few turns too far.


  21. Pingback: The American Troubles | The Anarchist Notebook

  22. Pingback: Cold Fury » That 70s show!

  23. bjdubbs says:

    Dohrn is now giving parenting tips on public radio. Somehow I don’t think Richard Spencer will be giving parenting tips on NPR.


    • X says:

      Feminism was a Jewish attack on white civilization.

      Period. And you’re a retard if you still don’t understand this fact.

      That bitch is pure evil.


      • bjdubbs says:

        There is a funny story about Dohrn and Ayers. They were raising Boutin’s son after Boutin landed in jail and D&A sent their adopted son to the local public school in NY, much to the horror of Boutin’s parents, also radical left wingers. Of course once D&A settled in Chicago they wised up and sent their children to the UofChicago Lab School, despite perfectly adequate local schools in Hyde Park.


  24. Pingback: Interesting Links for 24-01-2017 | Made from Truth and Lies

  25. Pingback: Outside in - Involvements with reality » Blog Archive » Quote note (#325)

  26. enkiv2 says:

    It’s weird that the author believes the CIA to be a hard-left asset rather than a neoliberal/centrist one (government tends to be culturally reactionary even if it’s economically center-left, because it wants to accumulate and keep power, and we have to recognize that for most of the CIA’s life it’s been involved in attempts to sacrifice major resources in order to stop communism, including the propping up of right-wing dictators). It’s also very strange that the author believes that the right lacks institutions: the hard-right has been actively building alternative institutions along the same models as the left’s since the 80s (since today’s center-right old guard is mostly former radical leftists who have turned) and positions and institutions that were moderately left-leaning in the 60s and 70s have become right-of-center due to the shift of the overton window. (It’s absurd to suggest that NPR and the New York Times are hard-left or even soft-left: they’re centrist organizations with an interest in holding on to the support of the current power-elite, who are mostly center-right.)

    Yes, there were crazies on the left that played out a violent drama forty years ago, during the era of COINTELPRO. But, differences in resources have been vastly overstated, and differences in resources projected out from the tail end of a huge left-wing youth movement aren’t valid when that movement is famous for having moved to the other side of the aisle to create the current right-wing status quo.


    • jsolbakken says:

      What confuses people is that they can’t seem to absorb the fact that the Deep State, as we are calling it now, is completely pragmatic, and uses an Hegelian process of Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis, to accomplish its objectives. Or, alternatively, I would say that one way to lo look at it is that the Deep State sees itself as the normal “Center,” and sets up “opposition” from “left” and “right” that it controls, in order to solidify it’s position in the “Center” as Supreme Overlord of All. Does it matter whether Right is the Thesis and Left is the Antithesis, or vice versa? What matters is, what is the evil and wicked totalitarian Synthesis the Deep State is shooting for.


      • enkiv2 says:

        Agreed — the deep state, like the spectacle, consumes all that opposes it and assimilates all weapons used against it, so it is not easily classified. (Or rather, it is too easily classified but not easily correctly classified: if you’re motivated to see shapes in the clouds, you can.)

        I’ve been surprised to see the far-right using situationist/culture jamming tactics normally employed by the left during the past few election cycles, although I shouldn’t be. Even intellectual weapons are wielder-agnostic.


      • jsolbakken says:

        “I’ve been surprised to see the far-right using situationist/culture jamming tactics normally employed by the left during the past few election cycles, although I shouldn’t be. Even intellectual weapons are wielder-agnostic.” For an example, I would say I support in general the policy of bombing the German and Japanese cities and infrastructure, but I oppose the bombing of a place like Dresden, which seems to have no military significance beyond psychological. I would not have opposed bombing Dresden to the extent that I would have refused the mission if I was a bomber pilot assigned to it, though. I would merely have said, “I wouldn’t have picked Dresden my self as a target, but, I’m not in charge of picking targets, so, let’s go.” I fee just like that about this Civil War II with the Leftist traitors who hate America. I wouldn’t necessarily encourage everything that is hurled at them, but, I wouldn’t necessarily give a damn either way if it seems over the top and a bit too much. That’s what happens when you act like a Leftist communist criminal traitor, the people you’ve been screwing over and oppressing and trying to assimilate lose their sense decorum and limitations. I’m ready to go along with bombing their Dresden, is what I’m saying.


    • Erik says:

      “It’s weird that the author believes the CIA to be a hard-left asset rather than a neoliberal/centrist one […] we have to recognize that for most of the CIA’s life it’s been involved in attempts to sacrifice major resources in order to stop communism”

      In the Sino-Soviet Split, both flavors of communist sacrificed major resources to stop the other sort of communism. The hard-left is prone to schism; opposition to a particular brand of hard-leftism is very weak evidence that an organization is not itself hard-left.

      (Read Fosetiiiiii!)


      Such as?


      • Donna says:

        You are kidding, right?! O.K., for example, The Cato Institute, AEI, Heritage Foundation, The Federalist Society, Americans for Prosperity, ALEC, FAIR, Family Research Council, GOA, Liberty Councel, National Right to Life, National Organization for Marriage, Eagle Forum, Center for Immigration Studies, Club for Growth, CBN, TBN, the many Tea Party iterations, and many, many others with their Orwellian names, just for starters! For a more complete list, see . I could go on writing for pages, literally! Where have you been over the past 4 decades, Rip?


      • jsolbakken says:

        Right Wing Watch? Why would we give a damn what they have to say, about anything? Sure, the Hegelian Dialectic that humanity’s enemies use to manipulate us involves a lot of controlled opposition, but an outfit like Right Wing Watch calls any organization that is not Left Wing nefarious and fascist and evil. It uses political criteria for the purpose of stirring the pot and manipulating Left wingers instead of focusing on facts. Also, you list GOA? Really? Would there be a Gun Owners of America if the Left Wing was not so rabidly anti-gun and crazy mad with intent to disarm the citizenry? There would be a National Rifle Association because it was founded before modern gun control was even imagined and was focused on shooting skills and technical issues, but GOA is all about the politics of gun control, more specifically, resisting it. If you want GOA to go away then stop trying to enact gun control laws. If you don’t want the Hegelians to have a GOA they can control then make the reason for its existence go away.


      • Erik says:

        No, I’m not kidding. If you have so many pages available, pick better examples. Because this looks like a Gish Gallop – throw out lots of bullshit, bullshit takes much more energy to refute than to produce.

        Take your first example, the Cato Institute. I went and read all the articles featured on its front page just now. They boil down to: Trump’s infrastructure plans are bad, Trump’s immigration holds are bad, the surveillance state is bad, and immigration is good. This is far from “hard right”. To boot, it’s founded 1977.

        The second, the American Enterprise Institute, I happen to know it’s founded pre-WW2. (Looking it up: 1938.)

        Heritage Foundation, 1973.

        You originally said: “the hard-right has been actively building alternative institutions along the same models as the left’s since the 80s”. Now you move the goalposts to “For a more complete list, see which I am pretty damn sure is not actually a list of alternative institutions built by the hard-right since the 80s – it looks more like a list of miscellaneous institutions built by the not-hard-left since approximately forever. And that’s without even getting into the weeds of “along the same models as the left”.

        Do you perhaps want to amend your original statement?


      • Erik says:

        Oops, just realized that Donna jumped into the conversation and isn’t enkiv2. My apologies for talking as though they were the same person.

        The general point stands. Donna, your list does not pertain to the subject that was under discussion.


      • X says:

        Donna, men are talking sweetie.

        You just listed a bunch of cuck organizations


        (((CATO INSTITUTE))) was on (((CSPAN))) yesterday telling the goyim that “hate speech” is not protected by the First Amendment.


    • spindlitis says:

      Have you listened to Gloria Steinam’s interview about her days in the CIA. She found them easier to work with than those in the rest of the government. I’ll see if I can find it.



  28. Pingback: Future History | The Jolly Landsknecht

  29. Pingback: Days Of Rage | Western Rifle Shooters Association

  30. DensityDuck says:

    Good essay. One of the cute bits (about the chinese revolutionaries) comes from here:


  31. Jorge says:

    “You don’t want white people to riot” That sentence alone resumes everything. It means “They have their patience, but you don’t want to see them angry, believe me, you dont”. And I am a white guy and I can say you are right. If they continue poking us, one day we are going to be triggered as fuck and civil war will start. Which, by the way, i’m not afraid of. See? This is the main difference between a jew and a white. I -as a white- will avoid violence as much as I can (see the statistics, this is as it is), but I can be triggered and then I won’t be afraid to die. Good news is that right now I feel 20% fed up haha

    While I respect that I really think you want to deescalate things, I trully believe that you know that it’s not the right’s fault at this point. We won the election fair and square. Bullies were sent by the DNC to Trump rallies (in order to blame Bernie). All nonsense has started in their side. We just want the lefties to behave and stand behind the country, there’s a lot of work to do and they can help if they want to. But lefties can be divided in top donors, organizers, and zombies. The thing is that if you don’t dismantle the architecture, top donors will be paying organizers to push zombies into stupidity.


  32. Dues says:

    As the democratic and republican parties seem to be dropping members like crazy (and becoming more radical as a result) it seems like we need more centrist organizations for independents and centrists to rally around. Because it seems pretty obvious that most people on the left and the right don’t want extremists to have power, it just that right now the incentives drive parties to be extreme.


    • Donna says:

      Yes, but what we want and what we need is real representation of our actual interests, economic, social and political, not the false dichotomy of “right” v. “left” or even the false chimera of “centrist” or so-called independent, because those latter labels are relative to and totally dependent upon/defined by the former. We should all be non-partisan, like George Washington, and demand candidates that either, a.) actually represent us, or b.) ARE us. The parties are the PTB’s main tool to divide and manipulate us. They are intended to deny us real representation and real representative government.


      • jsolbakken says:

        I also hate the kind of mindless partisanship that is merely about us versus them, red team versus blue team, which arises because politics is a money making business that people make their living at. But don’t pretend that there are not serious areas of substantive disagreement about policies that also explains the political polarization that takes place. It just so happens that I hate things like Obamacare, the minimum wage, gun control, immigration and especially H1-B visas, and shopping bag bans. Gee, wonder which party I’d feel more comfortable with? Duh. If you like Obamacare, the minimum wage, gun control, immigration and especially H1-B visas and shopping bag bans, then you have a logical preference for which party you’d want to support. What is sad is that whatever our policy views happen to be, there are mostly only crooks available to provide the political representation for them, and I doubt that will ever change. In fact I’d bet dollars to donuts that politics will ALWAYS be populated with crooks and liars and cheats and swindlers who do not really give a damn about what the policies are as long as they get rich.


      • Decade says:

        Well, jsolbakken, that particular list of issues is so materialistic that it can only have been produced by the partisan processes that you think you hate. I care about liberty and the full development of human potential, regardless of partisan issues.

        As for your list, I value affordable health care, government not subsidizing companies’ minimum wage employees via welfare, public health and safety, my immigrant colleagues’ contributions, and uncontaminated sea creatures to eat. (Really, how is plastic bag outrage a thing? We lived without plastic bags for millennia. We don’t hold grudges about other banned items that are totally unhealthy, such as asbestos.) Now what is the reasonable position?

        I disagree with the Democratic Party’s solutions to most issues, but between Bush and Trump I have less faith in the Republican Party. If I had my way, I would be maximally effective registering with neither.


      • jsolbakken says:

        You say my list of political issues is materialistic, but is not politics a materialistic field of interest? My politics is controlled by my spiritual morals and values, but politics cannot change the laws of physics or chemistry or economics. I hate gun control because it obviously empowers criminals at the expense of innocent victims. I hate minimum wage because it harms the poor and empowers the richest of the filthy rich and powerful. I hate Obamacare because it harms the poor and empowers the megalomaniacal bureaucrats. I hate immigration because it harms my country and empowers the Globalist criminals. There is morality all tangled up in these issues, but my judgement about them is based on the real world reality of how the policy works out in the real world and towards whose benefit. I am not manipulated by the emotional appeals of the politicians, both because I know they lie constantly, and I also have an independent understanding of how the world actually works, so when they tell me that gun control will reduce crime, I know that they are stupid, evil, crazy, and probably all 3. When they tell me that minimum wage helps the poor, same thing, because I know that economics does not work that way. When they tell me that more immigrants is good for my country, I don’t need to know anything more than to look around and see that where I live the ignorant and illiterate peasant immigrants all vote against me because they come from backward places where they never knew about anything besides the dirt and the mud that they tried to scratch out a subsistence living from. I’d like to help them have a better life, but not at the expense of destroying my own country, thank you very much.


  33. Pingback: Age of Rage? On Left, Right, and civil war – The Enigma of Scarhand

  34. spindlitis says:

    I thought of this yesterday and may be the ray of hope. The Left does not know how to create men. You wind up with adult boys. Even Dorhn talks about raising “feminist men”. The Right knows how to create men. The Lefties from the 70s were raised by parents that had sterner stuff. Do you really see Pajama Boy building a bomb?


  35. Pingback: 20 Alternatives to Punching Nazis - Alpha Gamma

  36. Pingback: The Very Best of Last Week in Reaction (2017/01/22) – The Reactivity Place

  37. Pingback: IT BEGINS: Trump Counter-Extremism Program To Focus Only On Islam -

  38. Pingback: Days of Rage – Orphans of Liberty

  39. Pingback: How many “lone wolves” would you need? | Wandering Through The Night

  40. Pingback: This Is Who They ARE | The Arts Mechanical

  41. Pingback: Peter Turchin Days of Rage - Peter Turchin

  42. Pingback: Episode 129 – Berzerkeley | GunBlog VarietyCast

  43. Pingback: Toolkit: Links 2/7 – sam[ ]zdat

  44. Pingback: Boldmug Part 1 – Swamp Reiver

  45. Mike says:

    Two comments:

    1. “The National Council of Churches (!!!)” …was a communist-front.
    2. Colombia is a pretty decent place now — seriously; go check it out. Pablo’s narco-state was Stalinistic in structure (i.e., it was more about loyalty than ideology, and frequent murder kept it that way) — it was the kind of fire that could only be fought with fire.


  46. Old Timer says:

    One thing that this writer gets wrong, is that if there ends up fighting in the streets, it will be lefties against lefties. Those are the only ones who are amoral enough to sanction violence. It was lefty against lefty violence in Wiemar Germany, and one group of Marxist socialists, the Nazis, won. It was lefty against lefty in the Spanish civil war, and like a true Marxist, Franco nationalized everything upon winning. So while the right eschews violence except in defense, it may acquiesce to the violence by that leftist organization that claims to protect the right (not that they actually do protect the right, but that’s a different story).

    I remember watching organizations like Queer Nation and Act Up emulate the tactics of another homosexual organization, namely the Nazi SA / Brownshirts. It worked, too, just like it did for Hitler. They effectively took over the politics of San Francisco.


    • kiddo says:

      My god, you boomers are fucking stupid. You are everything that’s wrong with this country.

      “lefties fighting lefties”

      So I guess you won’t be doing any fighting at all when shit hits the fan? Not that I’m surprised, you watched as faggots took a once beautiful city and turned it into Sodom and Gomorrah. But hey you wouldn’t want to fight in the street like a lefty, would you?


  47. Pingback: Der Movement is Disheartening and Demoralizing – eginotes

  48. CEOUNICOM says:

    The comments on this (excellent) piece are a convincing argument for Not Having Comments

    Liked by 1 person

  49. Pingback: Boldmug Says @ Scott Aaronson’s Blog – Lawrence Glarus

Leave a Reply


You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo


Twitter picture


Facebook photo


Connecting to %s
