Monica White: Ensuring greater inclusion in our food system

March 26, 2014

Monica White arrived at the University of Wisconsin–Madison in 2012 as a professor of environmental justice, with a joint appointment between the College of Agricultural and Life Sciences (community and environmental sociology) and the Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies. Previously she was a professor of sociology at Wayne State University in Detroit.

Her research engages communities of color and grassroots organizations that are involved in developing sustainable community food systems. She is working on her first book, "Freedom Farmers: Agricultural Resistance and the Black Freedom Movement." Other projects include a multiyear, multimillion-dollar USDA research grant to study food security in Michigan.



Do you have a specific project you’re focusing on?

"It’s because of my
work in urban agriculture
that I’ve looked to other
moments in history when
communities of color,
marginalized communities,
have turned to agriculture
to rebuild cities."


Is urban agriculture something new?





How does this keen interest in history affect what might happen in urban agriculture today?

UW-Madison environmental justice professor Monica White and students
Monica White (foreground, second from left) and students
visit Pleasant Ridge, a community that included black
farmers prior to the Civil War. Local farmer Maury McLean
(foreground, left) led a tour of the historic grounds.

That’s a great question. And it’s because of my work in urban agriculture that I’ve looked to other moments in history when communities of color, marginalized communities, have turned to agriculture to rebuild cities.

What I have found is that in moments when the United States has had economic downturns, black farmers have come together in an effort to rebuild or to survive, often in the form of agricultural cooperatives. You have moments where sharecroppers, tenant farmers, landowners—all kinds of agriculture workers—did things to ensure greater access to resources and to stay on and work the land. These agricultural cooperatives operated in three primary ways. One was through political mobilization and political engagement, such as harvest strikes and voter registration drives. Another way was that they pooled their resources. They bought land and tools together, and they would share labor as a way to increase capacity to meet their needs. And the other way was in terms of community and institution building. Way back into the 1800s you see black farmers who built and created schools and markets and all kind of things that were pivotal and critical to survival for folks in rural areas post-emancipation.

What makes the process of urban agricultural community building so challenging?

Young people, in particular, are aware of the trauma around growing food. You’ll be on a farm in an urban area and you’ll hear children say “I’m not a slave” or “Don’t treat me like a slave,” and so this conversation around agriculture as oppressive, and the economically exploitive relationships of sharecropping and tenant farming, is something that is very much in the purview of people’s understanding of agriculture. Understanding the role of farmers in the civil rights movement and the black freedom movement gives people a different way to look at agriculture—at how black communities have benefited from a resurgence of growing food in the three key ways I’ve just described.

Do you have a sense of further work that needs to be done in Wisconsin?

"Everybody can locate
themselves in this
movement and feel
connected to why it’s
important to grow food
and know where their
food comes from."

It’s similar to work that needs to be done in a lot of places. How do we broaden the audience? How do we broaden the conversation so that it’s more inclusive of folks who have traditionally been marginalized or have been oppressed by agriculture? I don’t think that’s a Wisconsin thing, I think that’s a national, even an international thing. So as we see folks moving from rural areas to urban areas, and then getting to urban areas and finding that there’s a lack of access to healthy food, that really is the critical issue. How do you frame this discussion so that more people see themselves at the table, literally and figuratively? It’s about the language that we use and the connection that we make with folks to see themselves as members and agents in their own access to food, also in a community sense. When we grow food together, what does that look like for our community?

Tell us what environmental justice means, since that’s a component of your work that we haven’t touched on here.

Environmental justice was a term coined in the 1980s, so it’s a relatively new movement. It’s a social movement that has two critical points. One is the idea of equal distribution of environmental health benefits and the burdens of environmental degradation. The other is an interdisciplinary body of knowledge that includes theories of the environment, justice, law and governance, policy and planning, development and sustainability. Environmental justice looks at where brown fields and other environmental hazards are located, and asks if we can identify those communities as being ethnically, racially, culturally or economically distinct. It concerns the degree to which there are excessive amounts of environmental hazards in impoverished neighborhoods.

Are people excited about urban agriculture and local foods?

Absolutely. There are various reasons why people are engaging in the local food movement as growers or buyers or both. In some ways it has become more interesting because people see their place in the food system. Everybody can locate themselves in this movement and feel connected to why it’s important to grow food and know where their food comes from.

This interview originally appeared in the spring 2014 issue of Grow magazine, published by the UW-Madison College of Agricultural and Life Sciences.