
+ Videocards
+ Memory
+ Beginners Guides
News & Advanced Search  Feedback?
[X]   Directory of
Guides & Reviews

Beginners Guides
Weekly Newsletter
Archived Newsletters

+70 MORE Beginner GUIDES....  

Contact the Suite 66 Advertising Agency
How Motherboards Are Made: A Gigabyte Factory Tour

AMD vs. Intel - Which is the Better Processor Now?

AMD vs. Intel - Which is the Better Processor Now? - PCSTATS
Abstract: For computer enthusiasts, there's been an age-old debate that dates back to the days when we were forced to carry our bits and bytes by hand, uphill both ways, in the freezing cold and feed them manually into a 9600 Baud modem.
Filed under: Editorial Published:  Author: 
External Mfg. Website: Intel Dec 31 2008   Julian Apong  
Home > Reviews > Editorial > Intel


The argument starts like this: Which is better - AMD or Intel? From there you can bet opinions differ strongly.

The real answer has changed over the years, depending on who you talk to and depending on what you want from your computer. It almost always comes down to which CPU offers the best performance for the kind of work you do, and how well the computer will stand up over the coming months.

Processors are certainly the most critical part of a computer, but they hardly work alone. It's nearly impossible to legitimately answer the AMD vs. Intel question without heavily considering the different platforms supporting each CPU, and by extension the features you get with one path and lose by not adopting its nemesis.

"Intel or AMD?" is a question we're asked all the time at PCSTATS, and a question that's echoed in computer stores from here to London, and fought on the battlegrounds of countless forums… Well, forget everything you've read before, I have the final, ultimate solution to the Big Green vs. Chipzilla battle royal! By the end of this article I'm going to tell which CPU is better, and that knowledge may save you from buying into dead, dying, and prematurely obsolete processor technology. Atomic batteries to power, turbines to speed, let's begin!

Previously in this PCSTATS Series

AMD vs. Intel - Which is the Better Processor Now?
(November 2008)

AMD VS Intel: What to Get? Which is Better?
(September 2007)

AMD Vs Intel: Will the Best CPU Please Stand Up?
(June 2006)

AMD vs Intel: It's An Eternal Struggle
(August 2002)

Comments and Feedback?

Round one: AMD vs. Intel - The Mainstream Choice

When your budget is tight and computer requirements easily satisfied by a mainstream desktop system, answering the AMD vs. Intel question starts something like this: What's the least expensive CPU with the most value, and are the platforms for that CPU stacked full of features? In other words, what's the best bang for buck?

Hands down, for mainstream PC needs the answer is AMD. The AMD Athlon64 X2 4850e that is, and for under $90 bucks it's hard to beat when paired with an AMD 780G based motherboard.

Before you go screaming to the PCSTATS feedback page, here's why we picked AMD for our mainstream CPU choice right now.

Technically, the most economical Intel and AMD CPUs on the market are both suitable for users building budget PCs in the sub-$500 category. Each CPU family is pretty inexpensive, power-efficient, works with affordable DDR2 memory and can be found in dual and single-core varieties. The choice gets complicated once you factor in the motherboard platform. Intel's integrated video chipsets cost more and offer less value than equivalent AMD integrated boards, while nvidia's recent core logic is simply hard to find.

Let's take two hypothetical mainstream PCs and compare them so you can see what I mean when I say AMD is the better buy in this instance.

AMD's popular 780G chipset is ideal for budget-conscious buyers because it offers decent integrated graphics care of the built-in Radeon 3200 GPU. It supports Hybrid Crossfire if you crave better 3D gaming down the road. Cost wise, it's hard to beat an AMD 780G-based motherboard like the Asus M3A78-EM (about $100 CDN), paired with the Athlon64 X2 4850e chip. The AMD 780G and even the newer 790GX variant will get you High Definition home theatre without any extra cost. That means HDMI output at 1080p with HDCP compliance, 8-channel audio, gigabit Ethernet and a compact micro-ATX board size to squeeze in (quietly) next to your stereo

Given the shift away from stand alone DVD players and VCRs to downloaded digital content, why on earth would anyone want a computer they can't hook up to their television? Right?

The slightly more expensive AMD 790GX chipset basically just has a faster graphics processor which is a little better suited to gaming, though it is still "integrated video". This speed bump isn't worth the extra $80 AMD is asking - that money would be better spent on a Radeon 4650, which would easily outperform a 790GX motherboard.

While its gaming performance isn't quite powerful enough to run graphics showcases like Crysis, AMD's 780G integrated Radeon 3200 GPU is capable of smacking around Intel's GMA X4500 HD in World of Warcraft or Call of Duty 4. So there's that too.

In fact, Intel doesn't have a whole lot to offer those seeking out a motherboard for under $100. Boards based on the Intel G45 Express chipset, like the Asus P5Q-EM are available for about $140, have similar features to the AMD 780G, but lack comparable integrated graphics. The anemic 3D performance offered by Intel's integrated GMA X4500 HD graphics processor makes even low-end gaming a frustrating, lackluster experience. Where High Definition content is concerned, both Intel and AMD platforms fair similarly in terms of HD video quality, so in that respect you could argue CPU overhead, or just acknowledge that each plays HD video just fine.

Fortunately for Intel users, there is a third, albeit untested option - the nvidia GeForce 9300 chipset. This isn't a discrete graphics card, as the name might imply, rather it's a new integrated graphics core. The GeForce 9300 puts up better performance in 3D graphics than Intel's GMA X4500 HD, in some cases slightly faster than AMD's 780G and 790GX platforms, but boards built on it are still relatively scarce.

I'd be remiss not to mention Intel's abundance of cheap and cheaper processors. The Intel Pentium Dual Core E2200 is roughly equivalent to AMD's socket AM2 Athlon64 X2 4850e in both performance and price. Both CPUs cost around $100, have 1MB L2 cache, are built on the 65nm processes and run at a native 800MHz bus speed. The Athlon64 X2 4850e is clocked at 2.5GHz, while the Pentium Dual Core E2200 runs at 2.2GHz, but in real world situations both processors provide nearly identical performance.

The bottom line is this. Where mainstream computer requirements are concerned, an AMD CPU and AMD 780G based motherboard just offer more value when weighed against a comparable Intel CPU and Intel G45 motherboard. Comparing the chips alone is another argument entirely, but remember it's not as if you can use a CPU without a motherboard!

Round two is next, this time PCSTATS tosses two chips into the gaming arena, and only one will be coming out.

© 2019 PCSTATS.com Next Page >


Contents of Article: Intel
 Pg 1.  — AMD vs. Intel - Which is the Better Processor Now?
 Pg 2.  Round two: AMD vs. Intel - the Gamers Secret Weapon is...
 Pg 3.  Round Three: AMD vs. Intel - going into the high-end zone
 Pg 4.  The final word: AMD. Intel. Intel.

   08 / 19 / 2019 | 11:35PM
Hardware Sections 

PCSTATS Network Features Information About Us Contact
PCSTATS Newsletter
ShoppingList Assistance
Tech Glossary
Technology WebSite Listings
PermaLink News
Archived News
Submit News (Review RSS Feed)
Site Map
PCstats Wallpaper
About Us
Privacy Policy
Advertise on PCSTATS

How's Our Driving?