


Where was this little prick’s teacher while he was creating and setting up this project? Unbelievable.


Teachers assign science fair projects and that’s damn near it for involvement.

I’m concerned about the response and find it outrageous.

A student, someone who is supposed to be learning something, came up with a hypothesis which he tested and reported the results. His experiment offered an excellent opportunity for discussion and discovery but instead, it was eclipsed by butt hurt and misplaced outrage.

This racial sensitivity shit we are mucking in and countering with censorship is BAD. We aren’t dealing with this racial issue appropriately and it’s going to bite us in the ass. By us I mean humanity.


Do we know if his sampling methods were anything recognized by standard statistical analyses?

Or did he just pick the colored fellows at school he knew to not be the sharpest of knives, then crossed them against his smartest friends in the smart people club?


According to my understanding, his project was not scientific in any way. He simply tested some fellow students.

This kind of testing simply shouldn’t be done. It reeks of 20th century eugenics BS.


All very good questions! That is EXACTLY the kind of questions that should be discussed. The methodology should be challenged.

More importantly, what does the results really say? Why are black kids not doing as well on IQ tests? Where are they being failed by the system?

So much could have been done with this in the name of furthering education but instead we shame it and this kid.


The student tested his race and intelligence hypothesis by having a handful of unidentified teens of various racial and ethnic backgrounds take an online intelligence test. His report concluded that the lower average IQs “of blacks, Southeast Asians, and non-white Hispanics” means they were not as likely as “non-Hispanic whites and Northeast Asians” to get into the academically rigorous program.


#exhumingphrenology #pseudosciencebasedbigotry


Sounds scientific. Kid had a theory. He developed a method to test it. He reported the results. He followed with a conclusion.

This is a kid Lotus.














Did you teach him that’s how you fish?


Or online IQ tests are generally stupid and meaningless :slight_smile:




I’m still going with "The little prick.:






There is nothing appropriate about what he did. NOTHING.


I did read the article.



It’s honestly the response that’s worrisome.