osmlol -10 points-9 points 7 months ago

You could interpret it that way, but it would involve someone assuming stuff that was not said in my post. I always type how I think, which is literally.

Freckled_daywalker 3 points4 points 7 months ago

Well, no, you literally said nothing about a closed door session in your post. One would have to assume that a closed door session was going to occur, but public hearings can occur without a subsequent closed door session, so it's not unreasonable to think someone might have the latter interpretation. I don't the other person was objecting to anything you said, just adding to it so everyone is on the same page. That's a good thing, not something that you should take personally.

osmlol -3 points-2 points 7 months ago

I don't wanna get into a long argument, but like I said you are right someone can interpret my comment the way you said but they would have to assume there was only a public hearing but normally there is a public and private session for these.

Anyways, I'm just glad it's progressing to hearings.