{"responseHeader":{"status":0,"QTime":9,"params":{"q":"{!q.op=AND}id:\"1056503\"","hl":"true","hl.simple.post":"","hl.fragsize":"5000","fq":"!embargo_tdt:[NOW TO *]","hl.fl":"ocr_t","hl.method":"unified","wt":"json","hl.simple.pre":""}},"response":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"docs":[{"thumb_s":"/80/c6/80c6630dc454a71a0513a3d4a0bbcf9b859ac3c8.jpg","oldid_t":"uu_uoh 4159","setname_s":"uum_uoh","restricted_i":0,"format_t":"application/pdf","modified_tdt":"2016-08-22T00:00:00Z","mass_i":1526422968,"file_s":"/46/7d/467dd53d325c3b036939539f5a2d538a001fe0c1.pdf","title_t":"Page 10","ocr_t":"JAMES B. LEE #1 probably the inference could not be made, although he did not completely discard the idea, and felt at the same time that the Supreme Court of the United States said you have to have a discovery on each and every claim. We do have a doctrine of pedis possessio, which means you can be in real possession of a mining claim until you make a discovery. Most mining people recognize that you just don't go out and make a discovery and then stake the claim as the statute would suggest; what you do is stake the ground and then try to make a discovery in the uranium field. So if you've gone into an expensive drilling program, and then you decide to sink a shaft as is being done in southeastern Utah near La Sal, you could argue that you're in peaceable possession of the other claims until you get the shaft down, so that you can project the shaft at deep levels off into claims where you haven't drilled, and hopefully make a discovery that way. And I am inclined to think that our federal court in this state would accept that sort of a preference if you had been diligently pursuing a discovery by sinking a shaft. Because to sink a shaft at the depths we're talking about will cost anywhere from two and a half to three million dollars. And certainly anybody that is spending that 8","id":1056503,"created_tdt":"2016-08-22T00:00:00Z","parent_i":1056534,"_version_":1613593747204866050}]},"highlighting":{"1056503":{"ocr_t":[]}}}