Intended for healthcare professionals



  1. Nick Payne, deputy director of public healtha,
  2. Carol Saul, principal research officera
  1. a Sheffield Health, Sheffield S10 3TG
  1. Correspondence to: Dr Payne
  • Accepted 28 October 1996



Design: Prevalence of angina symptoms determined by postal questionnaire on 16 750 subjects (18 to 94 years). Comparison of data on use of coronary artery revascularisation with prevalence of symptoms and mortality from coronary heart disease.

Setting: Health authority with population of 530 000.


Main outcome measures: Pearson's product moment correlation coefficients for relation between variables.

Results: Overall, 4.0% (95% confidence interval 3.7% to 4.4%) of subjects had symptoms. Prevalences varied widely between electoral wards and were positively associated with Townsend score (r =0.79; P<0.001), as was mortality, but the correlation between admission rates and Townsend score was less clear (r =0.47; P<0.01). Revascularisation rate and Townsend score were not associated. The ratio of revascularisation to number experiencing symptoms was inversely related to Townsend score (r =-0.67; P<0.001). The most deprived wards had only about half the number of revascularisations per head of population with angina than did the more affluent wards. In affluent wards 11% (13/116) of those with symptoms had coronary angiograms compared with only 4% (9/216) in poorer wards (χ2=4.96; P=0.026). Townsend score also inversely correlated with revascularisations per premature death from coronary heart disease (r =-0.55; P<0.01) and revascularisations per admission for myocardial infarction (r =-0.47; P<0.01).


Key messages

  • There is a large local variation in mortality from coronary heart disease and in the prevalence of angina symptoms and both of these are strongly correlated with material deprivation

  • Morbidity, as prevalence of angina symptoms, shows the same relation as mortality

  • The use of coronary artery revascularisation services is not commensurate with need and exhibits the inverse care law even though the supply of care is the same

  • Further work is required to ensure that the use of and access to facilities ensures that health care is targeted where it will have the greatest effect


    • Accepted 28 October 1996
    View Full Text