Editor's note: Steve Clemons directs the American Strategy Program at the New America Foundation and publishes The Washington Note, a popular political blog.



Steve Clemons says the Nobel panel correctly decided Obama's approach to diplomacy holds great promise.



WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Cynics will say that Oslo was jealous that Copenhagen, Denmark, scored a visit from President Obama, and giving him a Nobel was the only way to get him to Norway.



But the Nobel Committee's decision to make Obama the only sitting U.S. president since Woodrow Wilson to receive the Nobel Peace Prize shows the committee's clear-headed assessment that Obama's "unclenched fist" approach to dealing with the world's most thuggish leaders has had a constructive, systemic impact on the world's expectations of itself.



Obama has helped citizens all around the world -- including in the United States -- to want a world beyond the mess we have today in the Middle East and South Asia. They want a world where America is benign and positive, and where other leaders help in supporting the struggles of their people for better lives rather than securing themselves through crude power.



Obama has found a way in this interconnected world of cell phones, Twitter, Facebook and other social networking to reach a majority of the world's citizens with his message of hope for a better world. He speaks past the dictators to regular people and has, on the whole, raised global political expectations about everything from climate change to nuclear nonproliferation in ways that no one in history has done before.



Americans tend to look at everything from a U.S.-centric lens, and many woke up this morning shocked that Obama, who just saw a lot of his political capital wasted on trying to secure the 2016 Olympics for his hometown of Chicago, has gotten a fresh injection of sizzle to fill the Obama bubble.



The world has been mesmerized by Obama since he started to run for the presidency. The battle between Hillary Clinton and Obama for the Democratic nomination did more to educate the rest of the world about real political choice -- and about a system in which no candidates had an automatic lock on victory -- than any USAID program could have achieved.



Obama's decision to make the ulcerous Israeli-Palestinian negotiations one of the first foreign policy challenges of his administration, rather than the last, defied most seasoned analysts' expectations. His message to Iran's citizens, marking the Persian new year holiday of Nowruz, and his powerful and captivating speech in Cairo, Egypt, communicated to Muslims all around the world that their lives and their faith and their expectations for a better world were vital and as valid as any others.



From his perch in the White House, Barack Obama affirmed the humanity of Muslims and told them that America does value Muslim lives.



Obama's posture and rhetoric have reversed the collapse of hope and trust that the world's citizens had in America and stopped the degradation of America's image during the tenure of George W. Bush and Richard Cheney.



Should a U.S. president get the Nobel Peace Prize if he's about to send more U.S. troops, armed drones, bombs, tanks and other military hardware into the war-ripped zones in Afghanistan?



Or should Obama get the prize if he hasn't even succeeded in getting Israeli-Palestinian negotiations going? Or if he hasn't gotten Iran to drop its nuclear ambitions and to re-enter the international system on constructive terms?



The answer is yes.



I think that given how the odds were already so stacked against Obama on the global economic and security fronts, one can only be amazed at what this unlikely and fascinating president has done with "optics."



The night before Obama's inauguration, White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel accepted my congratulations and responded, "It's going to be tough, and right now we can only change the optics," meaning that political perceptions and appearances could be changed more quickly than hard realities.



What is brilliant about Obama and why he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize is that he is a global leader who clearly saw the gains that could be made in changing "the optics" of the
What has Obama changed? Who won the Peace Prize? what caused the collapse of hope? What did Clemons say? What does Steve Clemons say about Americans? What did he say about this? What has Obama's rhetoric done?
reversed the collapse of hope and trust that the world's citizens had in America President Obama, tenure of George W. Bush and Richard Cheney. the Nobel panel correctly decided Obama's approach to diplomacy holds great promise. tend to look at everything from a U.S.-centric lens, the Nobel panel correctly decided Obama's approach to diplomacy holds great promise. have reversed the collapse of hope and trust that the world's citizens had in America
question: What has Obama changed?, answer: reversed the collapse of hope and trust that the world's citizens had in America | question: Who won the Peace Prize?, answer: President Obama, | question: what caused the collapse of hope?, answer: tenure of George W. Bush and Richard Cheney. | question: What did Clemons say?, answer: the Nobel panel correctly decided Obama's approach to diplomacy holds great promise. | question: What does Steve Clemons say about Americans?, answer: tend to look at everything from a U.S.-centric lens, | question: What did he say about this?, answer: the Nobel panel correctly decided Obama's approach to diplomacy holds great promise. | question: What has Obama's rhetoric done?, answer: have reversed the collapse of hope and trust that the world's citizens had in America