Women’s NCAA title game outdraws men’s with average of 18.9m viewers
South Carolina’s 87-75 victory over Caitlin Clark and Iowa in the women’s NCAA championship game has achieved a pair of milestones.
It is the first time the women’s title game outdrew the men. It also was the second most-watched non-Olympic women’s sporting event on US television.
The Sunday afternoon game averaged 18.9m viewers on ABC and ESPN while UConn’s 75-60 victory over Purdue in Monday night’s men’s final on TBS and TNT averaged 14.82m.
From SNL to $500 tickets, women’s basketball is mainstream. But for how long?
Read more
The audience for Sunday’s game – where the Gamecocks capped an undefeated season by winning their fourth national title and denied Clark’s Hawkeyes their first – peaked at 24.1m during the final 15 minutes. The 2015 Fifa Women’s World Cup final between the US and Japan averaged 25.4m on Fox. That also was on a Sunday and took place in prime time on the East Coast.
“You’re seeing the growth in many places: attendance records, viewership and social media engagement surrounding March Madness,” UCLA coach Cori Close said. “I don’t think you can attribute it just to Iowa, though. A rising tide does lifts all boats. But I think all those boats have been on many different waterways. The product is really good, and the increase of exposure is getting rewarded.”
Nielsen’s numbers include an estimate of the number of people who watched outside their homes, which wasn’t measured before 2020. Due to cord-cutting, the in-home audience has steadily declined annually.
The audience for the national title game was up 90% over last year when Clark and Iowa fell to LSU. That also was the first time since 1995 that the championship was on network television.
The audience was 289% bigger than the viewership for the Gamecocks’ title two years ago when they beat UConn on ESPN.
“I had not seen it much (women’s basketball) before this year. I didn’t make it appointment television. This year, it was appointment television,” said former CBS Sports president Neal Pilson, who now runs his own sports television consulting company. “That’s what happened when you see those numbers. There were a lot of people making notes to sit down and watch the games.”
During the Final Four, Clark said the audience growth was benefiting all of women’s sports, not just basketball.
“I think you see it across the board, whether it’s softball, whether it’s gymnastics, volleyball. People want to watch. It’s just when they’re given the opportunity, the research and the facts show that people love it,” she said.
Clark and Iowa have the three biggest audiences for women’s college basketball. The Hawkeyes’ victory over UConn on Friday night averaged 14.2m, and their 1 April victory over LSU in the Elite Eight drew 12.3m.
Iowa’s six NCAA Tournament games on ESPN and ABC averaged 10.07m.
However, as Clark heads to the WNBA, many wonder if the college game can continue to attract large audiences.
Clark was the marquee player of March Madness, but there was an impressive group of freshmen, headlined by Southern California’s JuJu Watkins, Notre Dame’s Hannah Hidalgo and Texas’ Madison Booker. Watkins set the NCAA record for most points by a freshman with 920.
“There are also some great freshmen coming into the game next year who I think are going to make a tremendous impact. As long as we keep telling the story, there’s still room to grow the game,” Close said.
It also helped that the women’s game got increased exposure during the regular season on network television.
Fox carried 14 women’s games this season, including three in prime time, NBC two, and CBS had the Big Ten tournament championship. ABC had five regular-season games and nine during the NCAA Tournament.
Fox has announced the Women’s Champions Classic for next season on 7 December. The prime-time doubleheader will feature UConn, Iowa, Louisville and Tennessee.
Pilson thinks this year’s tournament has paved the way for further growth. Just maybe not at the level seen with Clark’s following.
“I wouldn’t call it a blip because I think the women’s game is going to definitely improve from ratings and exposure here on out,” he said. “The broadcast and top cable sports channels can still deliver an audience. Midseason coverage tends to focus on the teams and personalities to make the public aware of the athletes. But the game has improved over the last five years. It has become faster and more competitive. I also think they have learned from the NBA and NFL on how to promote its stars.”
Most audiences during March Madness also tuned in before and after Iowa’s games.
UConn’s 80-73 win over Southern California in the Elite Eight on 1 April, which tipped off after the Iowa game, averaged 6.7m. During the Sweet 16 on 30 March, LSU’s victory over UCLA, which preceded the Iowa game, averaged 3.8m.
The championship game’s return to network television has also benefited the women’s game. UConn’s victory over Tennessee in 1995 averaged 7.44m on CBS. Despite ESPN’s work growing the tournament since it acquired the rights in 1996, the closest the network got to that number for the final was in 2002, when 5.68m watched UConn beat Oklahoma.
“I think our game has been good for a long time and I think people have just missed the boat. Now we’ve finally had the exposure, and people have understood, ‘Wow, I haven’t watched women’s basketball for a long time, I’ve missed something.’ I don’t think they’re going to want to miss anymore,” Iowa coach Lisa Bluder said during the Final Four. “Caitlin has certainly been a tremendous star for our game, but there are so many stars in our game. So we’re just going to latch onto that next one next year.”