Context: There are technical limitations to archiving a web site, and as a consequence, it is possible for opposing parties in litigation to misuse the results provided by web site archives. This problem can be exacerbated by the practice of submitting screen shots of web pages in complaints, answers, or expert witness reports, when the underlying links are not exposed and therefore, can contain errors. For example, archives such as the Wayback Machine do not fill out forms and therefore, do not include the contents of non-RESTful e-commerce databases in their archives.

Question: What kind of limitations exist in keeping copies of a website?
Answer: technical

Question: The omission of what element in screenshots can make them unreliable as evidence?
Answer: underlying links

Question: What elements of webpages are not used by Wayback Machine?
Answer: forms

Question: What kind of sites contain information that the Wayback Machine does not record?
Answer: e-commerce

Question: What kind of limitations exist in keeping copies of the Wayback Machine?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: The omission of what element in Wayback Machines can make them unreliable as evidence?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What elements of webpages are not used by site archives?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What kind of sites contain information that the screen shots do not record?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: When is it possible for opposing parties to misuse e-commerce?
Answer: Unanswerable