Context: The process of selectio resembles eclectic textual criticism, but applied to a restricted set of hypothetical hyparchetypes. The steps of examinatio and emendatio resemble copy-text editing. In fact, the other techniques can be seen as special cases of stemmatics in which a rigorous family history of the text cannot be determined but only approximated. If it seems that one manuscript is by far the best text, then copy text editing is appropriate, and if it seems that a group of manuscripts are good, then eclecticism on that group would be proper.

Question: Which steps most closely resembles copy-text editing?
Answer: examinatio and emendatio

Question: What process is best used when only one manuscript is viable?
Answer: copy text editing

Question: What process is best used when there are a number of viable manuscripts available?
Answer: eclecticism

Question: The process of selectio does not resemble what type of criticism? 
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: Eclectic criticism is not similar to what type of process? 
Answer: Unanswerable

Question:  Which steps do not resemble copy-text editing?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What process is not used when there are a number of viable manuscripts available?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: When manuscripts are bad, what process gets used?
Answer: Unanswerable