Context: As advances and specialization have made new scientific research inaccessible to most audiences, the "literary" nature of science writing has become less pronounced over the last two centuries. Now, science appears mostly in journals. Scientific works of Aristotle, Copernicus, and Newton still exhibit great value, but since the science in them has largely become outdated, they no longer serve for scientific instruction. Yet, they remain too technical to sit well in most programmes of literary study. Outside of "history of science" programmes, students rarely read such works.

Question: What two elements have reduced the literary nature of scientific journals?
Answer: advances and specialization

Question: The segregation of science writing means that articles in those subjects primarily appear where?
Answer: journals

Question: The work of what classical scientists is caught between being outdated and of literary importance?
Answer: Aristotle, Copernicus, and Newton

Question: In what coursework is one still likely to encounter the works of these classic scientists?
Answer: "history of science" programmes

Question: The literary nature of science writing has become more pronounced during what time period?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: The science of Aristotle, Galileo, and Newton no longer serve for scientific instruction why?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: Students often read classical scientists outside what programmes?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What has made new scientific research accessible to most audiences?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What do students rarely study outside programmes of literary study?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What are too technical to sit well in "history of science" programs?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: The scientific works of which scientists are still studied regularly?
Answer: Unanswerable