Context: It is said[by whom?] on one side of this debate that separation of powers means that powers are shared among different branches; no one branch may act unilaterally on issues (other than perhaps minor questions), but must obtain some form of agreement across branches. That is, it is argued that "checks and balances" apply to the Judicial branch as well as to the other branches.

Question: What term is used when one branch of government must get approval from at least one other branch of government?
Answer: checks and balances

Question: What does combination of powers mean?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What does not apply to the judicial branch?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What does not apply to any branch of government?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: Branches are free to act in which way on all issues?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: The Judicial branch of government is the only one to which what is applied?
Answer: Unanswerable