Context: On one hand, this means that the Belgian political landscape, generally speaking, consists of only two components: the Dutch-speaking population represented by Dutch-language political parties, and the majority populations of Wallonia and Brussels, represented by their French-speaking parties. The Brussels region emerges as a third component. This specific dual form of federalism, with the special position of Brussels, consequently has a number of political issues—even minor ones—that are being fought out over the Dutch/French-language political division. With such issues, a final decision is possible only in the form of a compromise. This tendency gives this dual federalism model a number of traits that generally are ascribed to confederalism, and makes the future of Belgian federalism contentious.

Question: How many components does the Belgian political landscape include?
Answer: two components

Question: What are the two components in the Belgian political landscape?
Answer: the Dutch-speaking population represented by Dutch-language political parties, and the majority populations of Wallonia and Brussels

Question: What component is the Brussel Region?
Answer: third component

Question: What happens with the Brussels special position?
Answer: consequently has a number of political issues

Question: How many components does the Belgian political landscape exclude?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: How many components doesn't the Belgian political landscape include?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What are the three components in the Belgian political landscape?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What component isn't the Brussel Region?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What happens without the Brussels special position?
Answer: Unanswerable