Context: Wang, Štrkalj et al. (2003) examined the use of race as a biological concept in research papers published in China's only biological anthropology journal, Acta Anthropologica Sinica. The study showed that the race concept was widely used among Chinese anthropologists. In a 2007 review paper, Štrkalj suggested that the stark contrast of the racial approach between the United States and China was due to the fact that race is a factor for social cohesion among the ethnically diverse people of China, whereas "race" is a very sensitive issue in America and the racial approach is considered to undermine social cohesion - with the result that in the socio-political context of US academics scientists are encouraged not to use racial categories, whereas in China they are encouraged to use them.

Question: What is the name of China's only anthropology journal?
Answer: Acta Anthropologica Sinica

Question: Who is the race concept widely used by?
Answer: Chinese anthropologists

Question: What is race a factor of for the ethnically diverse people of China?
Answer: social cohesion

Question: Why does race undermine social cohesion in America?
Answer: sensitive issue

Question: What are academics in China encouraged to use that their American counterparts are not?
Answer: racial categories