Context: While the notion that structural and aesthetic considerations should be entirely subject to functionality was met with both popularity and skepticism, it had the effect of introducing the concept of "function" in place of Vitruvius' "utility". "Function" came to be seen as encompassing all criteria of the use, perception and enjoyment of a building, not only practical but also aesthetic, psychological and cultural.

Question: What term replaced Vitruvius' term "utility"?
Answer: Function

Question: In addition to being practically useful what other aspects did a building need in order to be considered functional?
Answer: aesthetic, psychological and cultural

Question: Whose concept of utility did the more modern concept of function replace?
Answer: Vitruvius

Question: What aspects of a building were considered part of the larger concept of function?
Answer: all criteria of the use, perception and enjoyment of a building

Question: What were the reactions to the idea that function should come before other concerns?
Answer: both popularity and skepticism

Question: What term replaced Vitruvius' term "nonutility"?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What was the term "criteria" replaced by? 
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: Whose concept of utility did the more modern concept of function not replace?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What aspects of a building were considered part of the smaller concept of function?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What were the reactions to the idea that function should never come before other concerns?
Answer: Unanswerable