Context: Some critics of intellectual property, such as those in the free culture movement, point at intellectual monopolies as harming health (in the case of pharmaceutical patents), preventing progress, and benefiting concentrated interests to the detriment of the masses, and argue that the public interest is harmed by ever-expansive monopolies in the form of copyright extensions, software patents, and business method patents. More recently scientists and engineers are expressing concern that patent thickets are undermining technological development even in high-tech fields like nanotechnology.

Question: What can be harmed by pharmaceutical patents?
Answer: health

Question: IP benefits concentrated interests to whose detriment?
Answer: the masses

Question: Whose interests are harmed by expanding IP?
Answer: the public

Question: Developments in nanotechnology are being undermined by what type of IP?
Answer: patent

Question: What type of monopolies does IP create?
Answer: intellectual

Question: What is suppoerted by pharmaceutical patents?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: what concentrated intersts for tha benefit of the masses?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What kind of monopolies does IP break up?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: Whose interests are helped by expanding IP
Answer: Unanswerable