Context: In Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971), the court determined that a Pennsylvania state policy of reimbursing the salaries and related costs of teachers of secular subjects in private religious schools violated the Establishment Clause. The court's decision argued that the separation of church and state could never be absolute: "Our prior holdings do not call for total separation between church and state; total separation is not possible in an absolute sense. Some relationship between government and religious organizations is inevitable," the court wrote. "Judicial caveats against entanglement must recognize that the line of separation, far from being a "wall," is a blurred, indistinct, and variable barrier depending on all the circumstances of a particular relationship."

Question: When was the case of Lemon v. Kurtzman?
Answer: 1971

Question: What state's policy was in question in Lemon v. Kurtzman?
Answer: Pennsylvania

Question: Whose salaries were being reimbursed in private religious schools?
Answer: teachers of secular subjects

Question: What did the state's policy violate?
Answer: the Establishment Clause

Question: What did the court's decision argue that the separation of church and state could never be?
Answer: absolute

Question: When was the case of Lime v. Kurtzman?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question:  What state's policy was in question in Lime v. Kurtzman?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question:  Whose salaries were being reimbursed in public religious schools?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question:  What did the state's policy not violate?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What did the court's decision argue that the separation of church and state could always be?
Answer: Unanswerable