Context: Scholars now believe that the Arian Party was not monolithic, but held drastically different theological views that spanned the early Christian theological spectrum. They supported the tenets of Origenist thought and theology, but had little else in common. Moreover, many labelled "Arian" did not consider themselves followers of Arius. In addition, non-Homoousian bishops disagreed with being labeled as followers of Arius, since Arius was merely a presbyter, while they were fully ordained bishops. However, others point to the Council of Nicaea as proof in and of itself that Arianism was a real theological ideology.[citation needed]

Question: Did all Arians believe the same things?
Answer: different theological views

Question: Were Arians also Origenists?
Answer: supported the tenets

Question: Did the bishops consider themselves Arians?
Answer: bishops disagreed

Question: What did the Council of Nicaea decide about Arianism?
Answer: a real theological ideology

Question: Did Arians have one set of beliefs?
Answer: not monolithic

Question: What party was monolithic?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What did Homoousian bishops disagree with?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What council wasn't used as proof?
Answer: Unanswerable