Context: In 1607, English Chief Justice Sir Edward Coke said in the Case of Prohibitions (according to his own report) "that the law was the golden met-wand and measure to try the causes of the subjects; and which protected His Majesty in safety and peace: with which the King was greatly offended, and said, that then he should be under the law, which was treason to affirm, as he said; to which I said, that Bracton saith, quod Rex non debed esse sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege (That the King ought not to be under any man but under God and the law.)."

Question: To what did English Chief Justice Sir Edward Coke compare the law?
Answer: golden met-wand

Question: According to English Chief Justice Sir Edward Coke, what should Kings follow?
Answer: God and the law

Question: When did English Chief Justice Sir Edward Coke speak in the Case of Prohibitions?
Answer: 1607

Question: How did the king feel about what was said in the Case of Prohibitions?
Answer: greatly offended

Question: What was Edward Coke's official title?
Answer: Chief Justice Sir

Question: Who called the law a golden met-wand during the sixteenth century?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: According to Coke what should kings be above?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: Who spoke about the rule of law in sixteenth century England?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: Who said it was treason to affirm the King was not subject to the law?
Answer: Unanswerable