Context: The Human Development Index has been criticized on a number of grounds including alleged ideological biases towards egalitarianism and so-called "Western models of development", failure to include any ecological considerations, lack of consideration of technological development or contributions to the human civilization, focusing exclusively on national performance and ranking, lack of attention to development from a global perspective, measurement error of the underlying statistics, and on the UNDP's changes in formula which can lead to severe misclassification in the categorisation of 'low', 'medium', 'high' or 'very high' human development countries.

Question: The HDI has been criticized for focusing exclusively on what?
Answer: national performance and ranking

Question: Has the HDI been criticized for being biased towards Western or towards Eastern models of development?
Answer: Western

Question: The HDI has been criticized for lack of what type of perspective on development?
Answer: global

Question: Critics of the HDI cite its focus on which: egalitarianism or authoritarianism?
Answer: egalitarianism

Question: The HIDI has been criticized for focusing exclusively on what?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: Has the HDI been criticized for being biased towards Northern or towards Southern models of development?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: The HDI has been criticized for lack of what type of perspective on nondevelopment?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question:  Critics of the HIDI cite its focus on which: egalitarianism or authoritarianism?
Answer: Unanswerable