Context: Colin Humphreys and W. G. Waddington of Oxford University considered the possibility that a lunar, rather than solar, eclipse might have taken place. They concluded that such an eclipse would have been visible, for thirty minutes, from Jerusalem and suggested the gospel reference to a solar eclipse was the result of a scribe wrongly amending a text. Historian David Henige dismisses this explanation as 'indefensible' and astronomer Bradley Schaefer points out that the lunar eclipse would not have been visible during daylight hours.

Question: What is recently considered the type of eclipse that occurred?
Answer: lunar

Question: How long would a lunar eclipse be visible?
Answer: thirty minutes

Question: What person possibly made a mistake while copying text?
Answer: a scribe wrongly amending a text

Question: Which historian says this opinion is indefensible?
Answer: David Henige

Question: What inconsistency would be found in this explanation?
Answer: the lunar eclipse would not have been visible during daylight hours

Question: What university is David Henige employed by?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What event did David Henige believe might have happened instead of a solar eclipse?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: For how many minutes did David Henige belive the lunar eclipse would be visible?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What city was Henige originally from?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What does Colin Humphreys dismiss the explanation as?
Answer: Unanswerable