Context: On December 20, 2005, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled in the case of ACLU v. Mercer County that the continued display of the Ten Commandments as part of a larger display on American legal traditions in a Kentucky courthouse was allowed, because the purpose of the display (educating the public on American legal traditions) was secular in nature. In ruling on the Mount Soledad cross controversy on May 3, 2006, however, a federal judge ruled that the cross on public property on Mount Soledad must be removed.

Question: When did the US Court of Appeals rule in the case of ACLU v. Mercer County?
Answer: December 20, 2005

Question: What was displayed in Kentucky courthouses?
Answer: the Ten Commandments

Question: Why were the displays of the ten Commandments allowed?
Answer: secular in nature

Question: When was a ruling handed down on the Mount Soledad cross controversy?
Answer: May 3, 2006

Question: What did a federal judge rule must be removed from public property?
Answer: the cross

Question: When did the US Court of Appeals not rule in the case of ACLU v. Mercer County?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question:  What was not displayed in Kentucky courthouses?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question:  Why were the displays of the ten Commandments disallowed?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: When was a ruling not handed down on the Mount Soledad cross controversy?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What did a federal judge rule must be removed from private property?
Answer: Unanswerable