Context: In the 1990s, protesters criticised the company's environmental record, particularly the possible pollution caused by the proposed disposal of the Brent Spar platform into the North Sea. Despite support from the UK government, Shell reversed the decision under public pressure but maintained that sinking the platform would have been environmentally better. Shell subsequently published an unequivocal commitment to sustainable development, supported by executive speeches reinforcing this commitment.

Question: For what particular reason did protesters criticize the company's environmental record in the 1990s?
Answer: the possible pollution caused by the proposed disposal of the Brent Spar platform into the North Sea

Question: What entity supported Shell during the 1990s protests?
Answer: the UK government

Question: Following the reversal of its decision, Shell published what?
Answer: an unequivocal commitment to sustainable development

Question: When was the Brent Spar platform disposed into the North Sea?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What government opposed the Brent Spar platform?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What did Shell admit was a poor environmental decision?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What commitment did executives condemn?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What did protesters in the 1990s praise?
Answer: Unanswerable