Context: Highlighting the potential for state and non-state actors to commit genocide in the 21st century, for example, in failed states or as non-state actors acquire weapons of mass destruction, Adrian Gallagher defined genocide as 'When a source of collective power (usually a state) intentionally uses its power base to implement a process of destruction in order to destroy a group (as defined by the perpetrator), in whole or in substantial part, dependent upon relative group size'. The definition upholds the centrality of intent, the multidimensional understanding of destroy, broadens the definition of group identity beyond that of the 1948 definition yet argues that a substantial part of a group has to be destroyed before it can be classified as genocide (dependent on relative group size).

Question: In terms of failed states and non-state actors, the possession of weapons of mass destruction was an issue examined by which writer?
Answer: Adrian Gallagher

Question: In Gallagher's definition of genocide, a source of what is malicious in it implementation of the destruction of a group? 
Answer: collective power

Question: Gallagher's definition upholds the centrality of what?
Answer: intent

Question: The centrality of intent broadens what definition, beyond the 1948 one?
Answer: group identity

Question: In order for a genocide classification to happen, a major part of a group has to be what?
Answer: destroyed

Question: Which writer examined the possession of identity?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: A source of what uses its power to implement destruction in Gallagher's definition of process?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: The centrality of what does Gallagher's definition uphold?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: The centrality of intent broadens what definition beyond the Gallagher one?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: A major part of a group has to be what in order for the centrality of intent classification to happen?
Answer: Unanswerable