Context: One recent proponent of the laws solution is Tim Maudlin who argues that the fundamental laws of physics are laws of temporal evolution (see Maudlin ). However, elsewhere Maudlin argues: "[the] passage of time is an intrinsic asymmetry in the temporal structure of the world... It is the asymmetry that grounds the distinction between sequences that runs from past to future and sequences which run from future to past" [ibid, 2010 edition, p. 108]. Thus it is arguably difficult to assess whether Maudlin is suggesting that the direction of time is a consequence of the laws or is itself primitive.

Question: Who argues that the fundamental laws of physics are laws of temporal evolution?
Answer: Tim Maudlin

Question: Maudlin argues that the passage of time is what kind of asymmetry?
Answer: intrinsic

Question: What grounds the distinction between sequences?
Answer: asymmetry

Question: Whose suggestion is difficult to assess in regards to the direction of time?
Answer: Maudlin

Question: Who oposses the laws solution?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: Who says that the laws of physics are not laws of temporal evolution?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What does Maudlin claim time is not in the structure of the world?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What does the symetry in the temoral structure of the world ground?
Answer: Unanswerable