Context: Anthropology of development tends to view development from a critical perspective. The kind of issues addressed and implications for the approach simply involve pondering why, if a key development goal is to alleviate poverty, is poverty increasing? Why is there such a gap between plans and outcomes? Why are those working in development so willing to disregard history and the lessons it might offer? Why is development so externally driven rather than having an internal basis? In short why does so much planned development fail?

Question: What perspective does development anthropology view development from?
Answer: critical

Question: What does development anthropology involves doing a lot of?
Answer: pondering

Question: Development anthropologists would like to know why if a goal is to alleviate poverty, that poverty is doing what?
Answer: increasing

Question: When it comes to plans and outcomes, what do development anthropologists look at between them?
Answer: gap

Question: What does a lot of planned development apparently do?
Answer: fail

Question: What tends to view development from a positive perspective?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What field of anthropology has a goal to eleviate poverty?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What looks for the connections between plans and outcomes?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What type of development rarely fails?
Answer: Unanswerable