Context: Sociologist Rodney Stark states that Jehovah's Witness leaders are "not always very democratic" and that members "are expected to conform to rather strict standards," but adds that "enforcement tends to be very informal, sustained by the close bonds of friendship within the group", and that Jehovah's Witnesses see themselves as "part of the power structure rather than subject to it." Sociologist Andrew Holden states that most members who join millenarian movements such as Jehovah's Witnesses have made an informed choice. However, he also states that defectors "are seldom allowed a dignified exit", and describes the administration as autocratic.

Question: What profession did Rodney Stark grow up to become?
Answer: Sociologist

Question: What statement does Stark make about the leaders of the Jehovah's Witnesses?
Answer: "not always very democratic"

Question: How do Jehovah's Witnesses see themselves in regards to the power structure of the church?
Answer: "part of the power structure rather than subject to it."

Question: Another Sociologist, Andrew Holden, feels anyone who joins a movement such as the Jehovah's Witnesses has made a what?
Answer: informed choice

Question: Holden acknowledges that defectors are seldom allowed a what from the church?
Answer: dignified exit

Question: Who described the Jehovah's Witnesses as a relatively democratic organization?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: Who said that it was formal rules that kept people in line in the Jehovah's Witnesses?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: Who wrote that the majority of people joining the Witnesses are making a pretty uninformed choice?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: Who wrote that people leaving religious groups like the Witnesses are allowed a dignified exit?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: Which sociologist said that the Witnesses are on the whole a democratic organization?
Answer: Unanswerable