Context: Opponents argue that the death penalty is not an effective means of deterring crime, risks the execution of the innocent, is unnecessarily barbaric in nature, cheapens human life, and puts a government on the same base moral level as those criminals involved in murder. Furthermore, some opponents argue that the arbitrariness with which it is administered and the systemic influence of racial, socio-economic, geographic, and gender bias on determinations of desert make the current practice of capital punishment immoral and illegitimate.

Question: Along with gender, geography and race, what bias do some opponents of the death penalty see in its administration?
Answer: socio-economic

Question: According to opponents of the death penalty, what does the death penalty cheapen?
Answer: human life

Question: According to death penalty opponents, on whose moral level does execution place the government?
Answer: criminals involved in murder

Question: What do death penalty opponents argue that capital punishment isn't effective at doing?
Answer: deterring crime

Question: Who do death penalty opponents believe may sometimes be executed?
Answer: the innocent

Question: Along with gender, geography and race, what bias do some people who agree with the death penalty see in its administration?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: According to opponents of the death penalty, what does the death penalty strengthen?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question:  According to death penalty supporters, on whose moral level does execution place the government?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What do death penalty opponents argue that capital punishment is effective at doing?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question:  Who do death penalty opponents believe will never be executed?
Answer: Unanswerable