Context: The court noted that it "is a matter of history that this very practice of establishing governmentally composed prayers for religious services was one of the reasons which caused many of our early colonists to leave England and seek religious freedom in America." The lone dissenter, Justice Potter Stewart, objected to the court's embrace of the "wall of separation" metaphor: "I think that the Court's task, in this as in all areas of constitutional adjudication, is not responsibly aided by the uncritical invocation of metaphors like the "wall of separation," a phrase nowhere to be found in the Constitution."

Question: What was one of the reasons early colonists left England to seek religious freedom in America?
Answer: governmentally composed prayers for religious services

Question: Who was the lone dissenter in the Supreme Court's ruling?
Answer: Justice Potter Stewart

Question: What did Stewart object to?
Answer: the court's embrace of the "wall of separation" metaphor

Question: Stewart felt the court was not responsibly aided by the uncritical invocation of what?
Answer: metaphors

Question: Stewart pointed out that the phrase "Wall of separation" was nowhere to be found in what?
Answer: the Constitution

Question: What wasn't one of the reasons early colonists left England to seek religious freedom in America?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question:  Who wasn't the lone dissenter in the Supreme Court's ruling?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question:  What did Stewart agree with?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: Stewart felt the court was responsibly aided by the uncritical invocation of what?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: Stewart pointed out that the phrase "Wall of separation" was everywhere to be found in what?
Answer: Unanswerable