Context: Standing out in Clarke's (and Newton's) response to Leibniz's arguments is the bucket argument: Water in a bucket, hung from a rope and set to spin, will start with a flat surface. As the water begins to spin in the bucket, the surface of the water will become concave. If the bucket is stopped, the water will continue to spin, and while the spin continues, the surface will remain concave. The concave surface is apparently not the result of the interaction of the bucket and the water, since the surface is flat when the bucket first starts to spin, it becomes concave as the water starts to spin, and it remains concave as the bucket stops.

Question: What stood out in Clark's response to Leibniz?
Answer: the bucket argument

Question: According to Clark's argument, water in a bucket, hung from a rope and spun, will begin with kind of surface?
Answer: flat

Question: As the buck spins, what happens to the water?
Answer: the water will become concave

Question: If the buck stops, the water will do what?
Answer: continue to spin

Question: What is the surface of the water apparently not caused by?
Answer: the interaction of the bucket and the water

Question: Who makes the bucket argument in response to Clarke and Newton?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What becomes flat as the bucket spins?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What does the bucket interact with to create the water surface?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What becomes flat when the bucket stops spinning?
Answer: Unanswerable