Context: Upon this basis, along with that of the logical content of assertions (where logical content is inversely proportional to probability), Popper went on to develop his important notion of verisimilitude or "truthlikeness". The intuitive idea behind verisimilitude is that the assertions or hypotheses of scientific theories can be objectively measured with respect to the amount of truth and falsity that they imply. And, in this way, one theory can be evaluated as more or less true than another on a quantitative basis which, Popper emphasises forcefully, has nothing to do with "subjective probabilities" or other merely "epistemic" considerations.

Question: What term does Popper use that roughly means verisimilitude?
Answer: truthlikeness

Question: Poppers notion of verisimilitude leaves no place for which kind of probabilities in the evaluation of scientific hypotheses?
Answer: subjective

Question: What class of considerations did Popper believe were not important in scientific measurement?
Answer: epistemic

Question: What is the logical content of hypotheses inversely proportional to in Popper's reasoning?
Answer: probability

Question: What term means the opposite of verisimilitude?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What was Popper's unimportant notion?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What can never be evaluated as more or less true than another on an quantitative basis?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What does Popper emphasize has a lot to do with subjective probabilities? 
Answer: Unanswerable