Context: Humans have shown extreme inventiveness in devising clothing solutions to environmental hazards. Examples include: space suits, air conditioned clothing, armor, diving suits, swimsuits, bee-keeper gear, motorcycle leathers, high-visibility clothing, and other pieces of protective clothing. Meanwhile, the distinction between clothing and protective equipment is not always clear-cut—since clothes designed to be fashionable often have protective value and clothes designed for function often consider fashion in their design. Wearing clothes also has social implications. They cover parts of the body that social norms require to be covered, act as a form of adornment, and serve other social purposes.

Question: What animal has shown extreme inventiveness in the clothing it has devised?
Answer: Humans

Question: What are space suits an example of a solution to? 
Answer: environmental hazards

Question: What type of implication might a certain type of clothing have?
Answer: social

Question: What value may clothing designed to be fashionable also have?
Answer: protective

Question: Why are some parts of the body covered?
Answer: social norms

Question: Humans have shown little inventiveness in what?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What does not have social implications
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What do social norms not require of clothes?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: The distinction between clothing and what is always clear?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: Clothing that is designed to be fashionable is not also what
Answer: Unanswerable