Context: For Ruskin, the aesthetic was of overriding significance. His work goes on to state that a building is not truly a work of architecture unless it is in some way "adorned". For Ruskin, a well-constructed, well-proportioned, functional building needed string courses or rustication, at the very least.

Question: Does Ruskin believe all buildings are works of architecture?
Answer: not

Question: What was most significant in architecture according to Ruskin?
Answer: the aesthetic

Question: To be true architecture in Ruskin's opinion what should be done to a structure?
Answer: it is in some way "adorned"

Question: What features at minimum did Ruskin insist on for a building to be considered functional?
Answer: string courses or rustication

Question: Who believes all buildings are works of architecture?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question:  What was least significant in architecture according to Ruskin?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: To be true architecture in Ruskin's opinion what should never be done to a structure?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What features at maximum did Ruskin insist on for a building to be considered functional?
Answer: Unanswerable