Context: In Thailand, a kingdom that has had a constitution since the initial attempt to overthrow the absolute monarchy system in 1932, the rule of law has been more of a principle than actual practice.[citation needed] Ancient prejudices and political bias have been present in the three branches of government with each of their foundings, and justice has been processed formally according to the law but in fact more closely aligned with royalist principles that are still advocated in the 21st century.[citation needed] In November 2013, Thailand faced still further threats to the rule of law when the executive branch rejected a supreme court decision over how to select senators.[citation needed]

Question: Where has the rule of law been more of a theory than a way of life? 
Answer: Thailand

Question: According to what principles are most laws in Thailand decided?
Answer: royalist

Question: In Thailand, what branch of government rejected a proposal for senator selection?
Answer: executive branch

Question: When did Thailand first try to overthrow its government run by a king?
Answer: 1932

Question: What harms the adherence to the Constitution in Thailand?
Answer: Ancient prejudices and political bias

Question: What kingdom has not had a Constitution since 1932?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What has been practiced in Thailand since 1932?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What has been eradicated from the three branches of Thailand's government?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What is no longer advocated in Thailand since the twenty-first century?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: Whose decision did the Supreme Court reject in Thailand?
Answer: Unanswerable