Context: In Australia, a technical issue arose with the royal assent in both 1976 and 2001. In 1976, a bill originating in the House of Representatives was mistakenly submitted to the Governor-General and assented to. However, it was later discovered that it had not been passed by each house. The error arose because two bills of the same title had originated from the house. The Governor-General revoked the first assent, before assenting to the bill which had actually passed. The same procedure was followed to correct a similar error which arose in 2001.

Question: The bill from the Australian House of Representatives was mistakenly sent and assented to by whom in 1976?
Answer: Governor-General

Question: Why did this occur?
Answer: two bills of the same title had originated from the house

Question: What did the Governor-General do with the first assent?
Answer: revoked the first assent

Question: This same procedure was more recently done to fix a similar error in which year?
Answer: 2001

Question: What was the reason a bill was accidentally assented in 1976?
Answer: two bills of the same title had originated from the house

Question: After an accidental assention of a bill with same name in 1976, when did a similar mistaken assention occur in Australia?
Answer: 2001

Question: What protocol was not followed in 1976 when a bill was mistakenly assented?
Answer: it had not been passed by each house

Question: How was the case of two bills mistakenly assented corrected both in 1796 and 2001?
Answer: The Governor-General revoked the first assent, before assenting to the bill which had actually passed

Question: In America, a technical issue arose with what in 1976 and 2001?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: A bill from the House of Lords was mistakenly submitted in what year?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: Three bills with the same title were submitted in what year?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: Who revoked the second assent?
Answer: Unanswerable