Context: Albertus Magnus championed the idea, drawn from Dionysus, that positive knowledge of God is possible, but obscure. Thus, it is easier to state what God is not, than to state what God is: "... we affirm things of God only relatively, that is, casually, whereas we deny things of God absolutely, that is, with reference to what He is in Himself. And there is no contradiction between a relative affirmation and an absolute negation. It is not contradictory to say that someone is white-toothed and not white".

Question: What idea did Albertus champion?
Answer: positive knowledge of God is possible

Question: Who influenced Magnus at this time?
Answer: Dionysus

Question: What is it easier to do regarding God?
Answer: state what God is not

Question: How do we deny things of God?
Answer: absolutely

Question: Who did not champion the idea drawn from Dionysus?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: Who believed that negative knowledge of God is possible, but obsure?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What is not easier to do regarding God?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: How do we accept things of God?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: What is there contradiction between?
Answer: Unanswerable