Context: About the creation-evolution controversy, Popper wrote that he considered it "a somewhat sensational clash between a brilliant scientific hypothesis concerning the history of the various species of animals and plants on earth, and an older metaphysical theory which, incidentally, happened to be part of an established religious belief" with a footnote to the effect that "[he] agree[s] with Professor C.E. Raven when, in his Science, Religion, and the Future, 1943, he calls this conflict "a storm in a Victorian tea-cup"; though the force of this remark is perhaps a little impaired by the attention he pays to the vapours still emerging from the cup—to the Great Systems of Evolutionist Philosophy, produced by Bergson, Whitehead, Smuts, and others."

Question: Which professor cited by Popper described the creation-evolution debate as "a storm in a Victorian tea-cup?"
Answer: C.E. Raven

Question: What controversy involving science did Popper believe was sensationalized because of its connection with religion?
Answer: creation-evolution

Question: In which year did C.E. Raven publish the remarks on creation-evolution quoted by Popper?
Answer: 1943

Question: What term does Popper use when describing creationism as a type of theory?
Answer: metaphysical

Question: Who wrote that the creation-evolution controversy was "not sensational" ?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: Who did Professor Raven say he agreed with?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: In what book did Popper called the conflict "a storm in a Victorian tea-cup"?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: In what year did Popper publish Science, Religion, and the Future?
Answer: Unanswerable

Question: Who thought the force of Popper's remarks was impaired to the attention he paid to the conflict?
Answer: Unanswerable