Hours before the top diplomats from his nation and the United States begin a high-stakes meeting, Russian President Vladimir Putin took to The New York Times to argue against military intervention in Syria and jab his U.S. counterpart. Using an op-ed "to speak directly to the American people and their political leaders ... at a time of insufficient communication between our societies," Putin made a case much like U.S. President Barack Obama did Tuesday night -- although their arguments could hardly have been more different. Striking Syria would have many negative ramifications, Putin argued in a piece that went online Wednesday night, including the killing of innocent people, spreading violence around the Middle East, clouding diplomatic efforts to address Iran's nuclear crisis and resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and "unleash(ing) a new wave of terrorism."
@highlight
Putin's op-ed is "irrelevant" and he "needs to deliver" on Syria, U.S. official says
@highlight
U.S.-funded weapons began reaching Syrian rebels 2 weeks ago, official says
@highlight
In a New York Times op-ed, Putin says striking Syria will hurt the region and world
@highlight
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry will meet with Russian counterpart Thursday
In his speech Tuesday, @placeholder said he was willing to test the seriousness and feasibility of the initiative before resuming his push for congressional authorization for military action, which at the moment appears unlikely to succeed.
@placeholder is taking the lead in dealing with the Russians.