By Daily Mail Reporter and Ap The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has rejected another product with 'Redskin' in the name, the latest sign that it might rule against the Washington Redskins in an ongoing trademark case. The agency said Monday that 'Washington Redskin Potatoes' would be considered disparaging because the product doesn't contain redskin potatoes and therefore would be associated with the football team. The ruling then stated that current evidence reflects that 'a substantial composite of Native American Indians find the current use of "Redskins" in conjunction with football disparaging.' Trademark: The U.S. Patent Office has rejected another product with 'Redskin' in the name, indicating it might rule against the Washington Redskins in an ongoing trademark case
@highlight
Patent Office says 'Washington Redskin Potatoes' would be considered disparaging because the product doesn't contain redskin potatoes
@highlight
In its ruling trademark officials said 'a substantial composite of Native American Indians find the current use of "Redskins" in conjunction with football disparaging.'
@highlight
The Washington Redskins have been in an ongoing battle with the Patent Office over the use of 'Redskins'
After 81 years, the team name '@placeholder' continues to hold the memories and meaning of where we came from, who we are, and who we want to be in the years to come.'