A man in a red shirt is standing next to a woman in a blue dress. They are both holding hands and smiling at each other. Romley's statement about the law's choices was followed by a statement from another witness, who criticized the law's handling of a specific issue. Romley then admitted that he had no idea what the law had to make. With respect to paragraph 603(b)(5), the analysis does not identify any relevant federal rules that may duplicate, overlap, or conflict with the proposed rule. If this premise is true, what does that tell us about whether it entails the hypothesis 'There was no analysis of this situation.'?
yes
no
no