119 Current Practices in High and Low Volume Centers Regarding Corporotomy Localization During Penoscrotal Inflatable Penile Implant Surgery
ABSTRACT Introduction Literature concerning corporotomy location in multi-component inflatable penile prosthetic surgery via a penoscrotal approach is scarce if not non-existent. However, corporotomy location represents an important issue that may influence immediate and long-term outcomes regarding patient and partner satisfaction as well as device durability. Objective To report practices in low- and high-volume penile implant centers regarding corporotomy location. Methods Data from 18 (13 European and 5 American) implant centers were collected retrospectively between September 1st, 2018 and August 31st, 2019. Variables included: intraoperative proximal and distal corpus cavernosum length measurement, total corporal length measurement, total penile implant cylinder length, and length of rear tip extenders. Additionally, patient characteristics, indication for penile implant, operative time, type of implant utilized, reservoir characteristics and short term complications were reported. Results 809 virgin penile implant cases were included in the analysis. Mean age of participants was 61.5 +/- 9.6 years old. In total, 299 AMS 700TM (Boston Scientific) and 510 Coloplast Titan® devices were implanted. The mean proximal/distal corporal measurement ratio during corporotomy was 0.93 +/- 0.29. A statistically significant correlation between lower proximal /distal measurement ratio and higher age (p=0.0013), lower BMI (p&amp;lt;0.0001), use of rear tip extenders (RTE) (p=0.04), lower RTE length (p&amp;lt;0.0001) and absence of diabetes (p=0.0004) was reported. In a 3-month follow up period 49 complications and 37 revision procedures were reported. Conclusions This is the first study reporting and evaluating the current practices regarding corporotomy location during IPP placement in a multicenter cohort, particularly when including such a high number of patients. Nevertheless, the retrospective design limits the study outcomes. Even in experienced hands proximal length measurement in relation to distal length measurement in penoscrotal IPP surgery is in many cases sub-optimal, particularly when the tubing-cylinder connection of each device is taken into account. Disclosure No