Do Mutual Fund Investors Care About Auditor Quality?
We study the influence of perceived auditor quality on investment decisions by bond mutual fund investors. Audits of bond mutual funds require significant auditor expertise. Fund managers estimate daily the fair market values of holdings that are often opaque and illiquid. Managers can use their discretion to manipulate their fund's performance results. While it is known that investment flows into funds that report good past performance, little evidence exists about whether investors’ confidence in the reliability of fund financial reports is influenced by auditor quality. Using hand-collected data from SEC filings, we find that the positive association between reported performance and investment flows is stronger for funds with auditors who are industry specialists and are longer-tenured, as well as for funds that pay higher audit fees. We do not find that auditor office size strengthens the association. We also find that the presence of industry-specialist auditors, long-tenured auditors, and higher audit fees lead to additional disclosure in the form of emphasis-of-matter. This study contributes to the streams of research investigating perceived audit quality, fund investment decisions, and auditing for financial services.

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.