A comparison of "clutter-agnostic" PHD filters
This paper describes a general approach for deriving PHD/CPHD filters that must estimate the background clutter process, rather than being provided with it a priori. I first derive general time- and measurementupdate equations for clutter-agnostic PHD filters. I then consider two different Markov motion models. For the Uncoupled Motion (UM) model, targets can transition only to targets, and clutter generators can transition only to clutter generators. For the Coupled Motion (CM) model, targets can transition to clutter generators and vice-versa. I demonstrate that R. Streit's multitarget intensity (MIF) is actually a PHD filter with a CM model. Streit has made the following claims for the MIF: it subsumes the conventional PHD filter as a special case, and can estimate both the clutter rate lk+1 and the target-birth rate Bk+1|k. I exhibit counterexamples to these claims. Because of the CM model, the MIF (1) does not subsume the conventional PHD filter as a special case; (2) cannot estimate Bk+1|k when there are no clutter generators; and (3) cannot estimate lk+1 when the target birth-rate and target death-rate are conjugate. By way of contrast, PHD filters with UM models do include the PHD filter as a special case, and can estimate the clutter intensity function kk+1(z). I also show that the MIF is essentially identical to the UM-model PHD filter when the target birth-rate and death-rate are both small.© (2012) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.