What to Wear Against the Wear? Ceramics in Shoulder Arthroplasty: a Comparative Study
Introduction: Failure of the polyethylene glenoid component is the most common complication of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA) and accounts for a majority of the unsatisfactory results after this procedure. Nowadays, most of the shoulder prostheses consist of metal on polyethylene bearing components. Repetitive contact between the metal ball and the polyethylene socket produces progressive abrasion of the implant if the moving part is made of polyethylene. Its debris may then lead to an active osteolysis and implant loosening. Failure of the glenoid component is often manifested clinically by pain, loss of function, and the presence of a clunking noise and leads to revision surgery. The use of ceramic balls aims at the reduction of this phenomenon. In many studies regarding knee and hip replacement it has been shown that the use of ceramic on polyethylene is more beneficial in terms of polyethylene wear and failure, when compared to metal on polyethylene. This is to our knowledge the first study to address in direct comparison wear in both TSA and RTSA. Materials and methods: Two different wear tests were conducted in order to address both TSA and RTSA kinematics. Since up to day, there is no test standard for wear testing neither for TSA nor for RTSA a customised joint simulators were used to create worst-case scenarios motions in both cases. In the TSA testing setup, the orientation of the glenoid component and humeral component was chosen according to M. A. Wirth (2009) study but with the humeral component assembled inferiorly. For the RTSA the applied kinematics was based on a study of G. Kohut (2012) and ISO 14242-1 (2012) standard. Three articulating couples for each material were tested for both TSA and RTSA for total of 5 million cycles. Standard midterm gravimetric measurements were conducted at each 1 million cycles. Results: The tests are currently ongoing and all results will be presented during next ISTA meeting.