Proppant backflow: Mechanical and flow considerations
• Measurements of proppant conductivity evolution with analog to field scenarios. • Intermediate scale demonstration of proppant flowback. • Preferential stability for propped fractures orthogonal to open wellbores or perforations. • Demonstration of particle Reynolds’ number concept for assessing proppant pack stability. • Creation of channels (“wormholes”) increases conductivity, until significant backflow occurs. One of the concerns of using proppant in geothermal wells, and particularly in enhanced geothermal systems, is proppant flowback. Particulate proppant maintain post-closure conductivity in hydraulically opened fractures. If that proppant is displaced from the near-wellbore region, either due to overflushing during stimulation or flowback to the wellbore at any time, the reduced fracture width chokes the injection or production. Two intermediate-scale laboratory analogs of a propped hydraulic fracture were prepared, and fluid was flowed through a normally stressed, propped fracture into a central wellbore. The tests were conducted in a polyaxial load frame. Acoustic/microseismic activity was measured during the injection programs. In one scenario—radial flow through a transverse fracture to a wellbore—the results suggest the creation of flow channels and nominally intact propped zones around the channels, maintaining fracture aperture. In the other—linear flow through a longitudinal fracture into a wellbore—there was substantially more proppant removal. The measurements have shown a greater tendency for proppant flowback in a linear flow situation (proppant movement is kinematically more restricted for radial convergent flow). The pressure gradients causing flow are exceedingly small and restraining flowback will be difficult. Convergent flow relationships could be an issue for injector wells, which will experience fluid flowback during hard shutdowns.