Watchdog rejects Met complaint over No 10 party - BBC News
The force referred itself to the IOPC after Green Party peer Jenny Jones said there was a "case to answer".
The police watchdog has rejected a complaint over how the Metropolitan Police handled allegations of a Christmas party in No 10 last year.

The force referred itself to the Independent Office for Police Conduct after a complaint from Green Party peer Baroness Jones.

She argued officers outside No 10 "must have known" if an unlawful gathering had taken place during lockdown.

But the IOPC released a statement, saying the referral was "invalid".

Last month, the Mirror newspaper reported that a Downing Street Christmas party had taken place on 18 December last year, when London was under strict coronavirus restrictions.

A source has told the BBC there had been food and drink and that the gathering had gone on past midnight.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson has ordered an inquiry into the allegations about this and other gatherings, which is being led by senior civil servant Sue Gray.

The Met Police said it was not beginning an investigation into the allegations, "based on the absence of evidence and in line with our policy not to investigate retrospective breaches of such regulations".

The statement added that the Met had spoken to the government about its own inquiry and that "if any evidence is found as a result of that investigation, it will be passed to the Met for further consideration".

Baroness Jones complained about the Met's attitude towards alleged Downing Street parties

But Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb said police working outside No 10 controlled "all access to and from Downing Street".

"Put very simply, if there was an unlawful gathering taking place at No 10 Downing Street, then the police must have known and were highly likely to have played an active part in organising or facilitating the illegal gathering," she added.

"I believe there is a case to answer for the police aiding and abetting a criminal offence or deliberately failing to enforce the law in favour of government politicians and their staff."

She also argued that Met Police Commissioner Dame Cressida Dick's decision not to investigate the reported party represented "a potential cover-up".

As a result, Acting Detective Chief Superintendent Tony O'Sullivan of the Met Police said he had referred the complaint to the IOPC, "given that you effectively allege misconduct in public office by MPS [Metropolitan Police Service] police officers".

But the watchdog has dismissed her complaint.

In a statement, they said a "valid complaint" could only be made when "an individual, or someone acting on their behalf, has been adversely affected by the alleged conduct or its effects".

And as there was no evidence Baroness Jones had been nearby when the event took place, "we have decided it is invalid".

However, the IOPC added: "If evidence were to come to light that anyone serving with the police may have breached standards of professional behaviour or committed a criminal offence, linked to the alleged party, we have reminded the Metropolitan Police of its obligations to refer relevant matters to us, irrespective of whether or not a valid complaint has been made."

Det Ch Supt O'Sullivan said he had referred the second part of Baroness' Jones' complaint - that the police commissioner had not investigated the allegation of a party in No 10 - to the London Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime (MOPC) which sets the direction and budget for the Met.

An MOPC spokesperson said: "A complaint has been received and is under consideration."