The Washington Post
english
['new persian', 'english grammar', 'sanskrit', 'breton', 'japanese', 'castilian', 'yue', 'cantonese', 'meadow mari', 'greek', 'kiswahili', 'hebrew grammar', 'zulu', 'punjabi', 'kurdish', 'german', 'czech', 'syriac', 'azerbaijani', 'esperanto', 'catalan', 'pali', 'thai', 'ukrainian', 'vedic sanskrit', 'armenian', 'hindustani', 'valencian', 'sinhalese', 'burmese', 'serbian cyrillic', 'romanian', 'khmer', 'filipino', 'northern sami', 'tamil', 'french sign', 'esperantists', 'norse', 'north korean', 'american english', 'high german', 'tamil romantic', 'old russian', 'lowland scots', 'tibetan', 'irish', 'old english', 'uzbek', 'hebraica', 'middle english', 'medieval latin', 'macedonian', 'mandarin chinese', 'spanish', 'hindi', 'estonian', 'sinhala', 'welsh', 'danish', 'magyar', 'croatian', 'afrikaans', 'oriya', 'corsican', 'biblical', 'alemannic', 'tagalog', 'quechua', 'ancient greek', 'castilian spanish', 'attic greek', 'vietnamese', 'hebrew', 'hispanic', 'scots', 'persian', 'italian', 'basque', 'australian english', 'koine greek', 'hangul', 'malayalam', 'vedic', 'belarusian', 'biblical hebrew', 'norwegian', 'hellenic', 'dzongkha', 'germanic', 'indonesian', 'latin', 'georgian', 'bulgarian', 'bengali', 'hungarian', 'portuguese', 'classical hebrew', 'marathi']
Press coverage during the Armenian Genocide
This page contains a selected list of press headlines relevant to the Armenian Genocide in chronological order, as recorded in newspaper archives. The sources prior to 1914 relate in large part to the Hamidian massacre and the Adana massacre. The Armenian Genocide was covered largely in the international community and in many publications such as magazines, newspapers, books, memoirs, and more. Some organizations, like the Near East Foundation used media and newspapers to raise the plight of the Armenians. However, after World War I ended, the Armenian Genocide received little press for the first half of the 20th century. Press coverage and public discussion resumed in the last quarter of the 20th century, and the discourse in the media has expanded into the 21st century. Press discussion and photographs have been particularly important in educating the public about the Genocide. Press coverage is also considered valuable and important because it constitutes primary sources of direct evidence. During the time period, much of the global press had condemned the nature of the massacres and calls for aid of the Armenians. Coverage of the Armenian Genocide was done by many throughout the world and were often similar when depicting the massacres. Many well-known newspapers in the English language such as The Times, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, The Globe and Mail, The Toronto Star, The Montreal Gazette, and others also reported extensively about the events. It is believed that The New York Times published thousands of articles pertaining to the Armenian massacres between 1894-1922 and 124 articles in 1915 alone. Some countries, like Australia, relied largely on news agencies in Europe for their information. It is noted that newspapers such as The Washington Post and The New York Times reported on the Armenian massacres almost daily for over a year. The coverage mainly included reports by correspondents, travelers, and consuls or ambassadors of different countries based in the different regions of the Ottoman Empire. Additionally, detailed reports came from missionaries who witnessed the massacres and attempted to aid orphans and other survivors. Local press coverage in the Ottoman Empire came mainly from the Takvim-i Vekayi, the official gazette of the Ottoman government. During the Turkish Courts-Martial of 1919–1920, the newspaper became especially important because it reported the cross-examinations of Turkish officials and the verdict of court which sentenced Talat, Enver, and Cemal Pashas to death for their roles in massacres against Armenians. Noteworthy studies of the press coverage of Muslim communities in the Middle East and particularly that of Syria have also been instrumental in depicting first hand accounts of the Armenian deportees exiled to the area. The Syrian press also made note of the demographic impact of the Armenian deportees into the region and condemned the Ottoman government for what it largely believed was a campaign of "annihilation", "extermination", and the "uprooting of a race". Terms such as "massacre", "killed", "murdered", "slaughtered", "systematic massacre", "extermination", "atrocities", and "war crimes" were used instead of "genocide" during the period, as Raphael Lemkin coined the term "genocide" much later in 1943. It was during this time, however, that stereotypes often arose which favored the plight of the Armenians over the Turks. Claims such as the "Terrible Turk" were invented to depict Turks as such during which Armenians were oftentimes depicted as innocent. Such stereotypes have often been considered Anti-Turkish by scholars today. Exhibitions set up by the Armenian Genocide Museum in Yerevan have been held in Denmark, Lebanon, Sweden, and the United States displaying numerous periodicals from the international press dating from 1860 to 1922. There have also been numerous studies and books published about the press coverage of the Genocide including: "El Genocidio armenio en la prensa del Uruguay, año 1915" (The Uruguayan Press of 1915 on the Genocide of Armenians) by Daniel Karamanoukian, "Le Genocide Armenien dans la presse Canadian" (The Armenian Genocide in the Canadian Press) by the Armenian Youth Federation of Canada, "The Armenian Genocide: News Accounts From the American Press 1915-1922" by Richard G. Kloian, "The Armenian Genocide as Reported in the Australian Press" by Vahe Kateb, "Heralding of the Armenian Genocide: Reports in The Halifax Herald, 1894-1922" by Katia Minas Peltekian, ""The Globe"'s representation of the Armenian genocide and Canada's acknowledgement" by Karen Ashford, "Through the Eyes of the "Post": American Media Coverage of the Armenian Genocide by Jessica L. Taylor" and others.