{"content":[{"text":"previously established typological categories, the data presented here show that, while Apurimac \n Quechua exhibits canonical S-framed patterns, it can also use V-framed patterns in specific \n contexts, helping to further the typological research on Motion events.","bbox":{"left":0.117686,"top":0.089071,"width":0.764869,"height":0.05506000000000001}},{"text":"Glossing abbreviations \n PST Past \n DET Determiner \n ACC Accusative Case \n CIS Cislocative","bbox":{"left":0.117686,"top":0.179056,"width":0.20785700000000001,"height":0.10128700000000002}},{"text":"References \n Beavers, J., Levin, B., & Tham, S. W. (2010). The typology of motion expressions revisited. \n Journal of Linguistics, 46(2), 331-377. \n Ishibashi, M., Kopecka, A., & Vuillermet, M. (2006). Trajectoire: matériel visuel pour élicitation \n des données linguistiques. Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage (CNRS/Université Lyon 2)–Projet \n «Trajectoire», Fédération de Recherche en Typologie et Universaux Linguistiques, CNRS, France. \n Levin, B., & Hovav, M. R. (2015). Lexicalization patterns. Handbook of Event Structure, Oxford: \n Oxford University Press [consultado el 12.4. 16 en: p://web. stanford. edu/~ bclevin/lexpat15. pdf]. \n Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. Language typology \n and syntactic description, 3(99), 36-149. \n Wilkins, D., Nash, D., & Simpson, J. (1998). Questionnaire on motion in Australian languages \n (modified).","bbox":{"left":0.117686,"top":0.306669,"width":0.769533,"height":0.27737399999999995}}],"images_bbox":[],"images_bbox_not_text_overlap":[]}