{"content":[{"text":"TABLE OF CONTENTS","bbox":{"left":0.4,"top":0.090871,"width":0.20000299999999993,"height":0.017164}},{"text":"I.","bbox":{"left":0.138235,"top":0.125719,"width":0.023530999999999996,"height":0.017163999999999985}},{"text":"Introduction..............................................1","bbox":{"left":0.176471,"top":0.125719,"width":0.6941199999999998,"height":0.017163999999999985}},{"text":"II.","bbox":{"left":0.126471,"top":0.159962,"width":0.035295999999999994,"height":0.017164000000000013}},{"text":"Background................................................5","bbox":{"left":0.176471,"top":0.159962,"width":0.6941199999999998,"height":0.017164000000000013}},{"text":"A. Homosexual Employees Generally Claim Their Employers \n Violated Their Constitutional Rights ...................5","bbox":{"left":0.176471,"top":0.194356,"width":0.6941189999999999,"height":0.03428499999999998}},{"text":"B. Courts Analyze Homosexual Employees’ Constitutional \n Claims Using A Rational Basis Test .....................7","bbox":{"left":0.176471,"top":0.245871,"width":0.6941200000000001,"height":0.03428500000000001}},{"text":"1. First Amendment Claims...............................7","bbox":{"left":0.205882,"top":0.297235,"width":0.664708,"height":0.017164000000000013}},{"text":"2. Equal Protection And Substantive Due Process Claims.10","bbox":{"left":0.205882,"top":0.331628,"width":0.664708,"height":0.017164000000000013}},{"text":"C. The Supreme Court Extended Its Notion Of An Individual’s \n Right To Privacy To Protect Private, Homosexual Conduct \n ...................................................... 16","bbox":{"left":0.176471,"top":0.366022,"width":0.700002,"height":0.05140699999999998}},{"text":"D. Congress’ Attempts to Enact The Employment Non- \n Discrimination Act ....................................22","bbox":{"left":0.176471,"top":0.434659,"width":0.6941189999999999,"height":0.03428500000000001}},{"text":"III.","bbox":{"left":0.114706,"top":0.486022,"width":0.04706099999999999,"height":0.017164000000000013}},{"text":"Analysis.................................................23","bbox":{"left":0.176471,"top":0.486022,"width":0.6941199999999998,"height":0.017164000000000013}},{"text":"A. The Court’s Analysis in Lawrence Forces Future Courts To \n Question The Reasonableness Of The Employer’s Traditional \n Rational Bases ........................................23","bbox":{"left":0.176471,"top":0.520416,"width":0.700002,"height":0.05155799999999999}},{"text":"1. Criminality.........................................26","bbox":{"left":0.205882,"top":0.589053,"width":0.664709,"height":0.017163999999999957}},{"text":"2. Workplace Unity.....................................31","bbox":{"left":0.205882,"top":0.623447,"width":0.6647090000000001,"height":0.017163999999999957}},{"text":"3. Public Image And Credibility........................33","bbox":{"left":0.205882,"top":0.657689,"width":0.664709,"height":0.017163999999999957}},{"text":"4. National Security Risks.............................35","bbox":{"left":0.205882,"top":0.692083,"width":0.664709,"height":0.017163999999999957}},{"text":"B. The Lawrence Decision Opened The Door For A Future Court \n to Declare Homosexuals To Be A Suspect Class, and \n Private, Homosexual Conduct To Be A Fundamental Right .39","bbox":{"left":0.176471,"top":0.726325,"width":0.6941200000000001,"height":0.05155799999999999}},{"text":"1. Creating A Fundamental Right To Privacy.............41","bbox":{"left":0.205882,"top":0.795113,"width":0.664709,"height":0.017163999999999957}},{"text":"2. Granting Heightened Scrutiny To Homosexuals’ Equal \n Protection Claims...................................46","bbox":{"left":0.205882,"top":0.829356,"width":0.664709,"height":0.03428500000000001}},{"text":"i","bbox":{"left":0.497255,"top":0.95468,"width":0.005448000000000008,"height":0.01677899999999999}}],"images_bbox":[],"images_bbox_not_text_overlap":[]}