{"content":[{"text":"TABLE OF CONTENTS \n Page \n TABLE OF AUTHORITIES.................................... ii \n INTERESTS OF AMICI .......................................... 1 \n SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT................................. 3 \n ARGUMENT............................................................. 5 \n I. Noncitizens face substantial barriers to \n administrative and judicial review of their \n removal orders .................................................. 5 \n A. Immigration law’s complexity makes \n administrative and judicial review diffi- \n cult to obtain ................................................ 6 \n B. Most people in removal proceedings do \n not have counsel, and many do not \n speak English ............................................... 9 \n C. Continued detention impedes meaning- \n ful access to appeal and judicial review .... 14 \n II. Appeal and judicial review may be practi- \n cally unavailable if removal depends on er- \n roneous binding precedent .............................. 17 \n CONCLUSION ......................................................... 19","bbox":{"left":0.254803,"top":0.169917,"width":0.4894740000000001,"height":0.44650199999999995}},{"text":"(i)","bbox":{"left":0.488882,"top":0.818401,"width":0.019608000000000014,"height":0.018213999999999952}}],"images_bbox":[],"images_bbox_not_text_overlap":[]}