{"content":[{"text":"exploring whether RBKC’s planning department is a shared service with neighbouring \n boroughs who could replace RBKC. \n Action: Secretariat to explore and advise community representatives at the next \n meeting. \n Questions were raised by community representatives about whether the Site would return \n to RBKC. It was explained that this is a decision for the Memorial Commission.","bbox":{"left":0.12625,"top":0.040859,"width":0.783834,"height":0.109094}},{"text":"•","bbox":{"left":0.096008,"top":0.113402,"width":0.009273000000000003,"height":0.017461000000000004}},{"text":"Pastoral support \n • The secretariat introduced an item which set out the proposed individual wellbeing \n support package for Commission members to ensure they were properly supported in \n their role. Community representatives agreed to explore individual support plans \n following the meeting. They also strongly supported the need for pastoral support to be \n available at community events for attendees. The secretariat confirmed that support for \n the community was also being provided. \n Action: Secretariat to follow up with representatives to discuss individual needs for \n wellbeing support.","bbox":{"left":0.090363,"top":0.165823,"width":0.8198960000000001,"height":0.161783}},{"text":"Media handling \n • The MHCLG Communications team introduced an item explaining the interim media \n handling support available. Community representatives agreed they would want to agree \n their own spokesperson but were happy for MHCLG to provide interim media handling \n support, with representatives collectively agreeing media lines. Community \n representatives were content with the offer of media training and suggested that they \n would need business cards. \n Action: Secretariat to progress options for business cards.","bbox":{"left":0.090363,"top":0.343762,"width":0.819957,"height":0.144223}},{"text":"Upcoming key decisions \n • The secretariat introduced an item which set out the upcoming decisions needed to agree \n the Commission’s chair and public authority members and agreed to circulate the chair \n role description ahead of the next meeting. The secretariat suggested that early decisions \n once the chair was in place should include ways of working, what the Commission’s \n community engagement strategy will look like, the Commission website’s content and \n branding, and decisions on repatriating the 9/11 Survivor Tree seedling. \n Action: Secretariat to provide examples of ways of working once the chair is in place.","bbox":{"left":0.090363,"top":0.502566,"width":0.8198350000000001,"height":0.14308200000000004}},{"text":"AOB \n • Action: secretariat to circulate the meeting papers and minutes. \n • Some community representatives were concerned about apparent decisions made by \n those involved in earlier discussions prior to the voting for representatives and the lack \n of transparency around this process. The secretariat confirmed that no decisions other \n than the name of the Commission and voting for representatives had been agreed and \n consulted on. \n • Community representatives agreed to consider the process for creating a reserve list for \n community representatives as part of their ways of working discussions.","bbox":{"left":0.090363,"top":0.661405,"width":0.819956,"height":0.16406300000000007}},{"text":"Next meeting: Wednesday 16 October","bbox":{"left":0.090363,"top":0.841268,"width":0.341855,"height":0.019584000000000046}},{"text":"Meeting end.","bbox":{"left":0.090363,"top":0.876611,"width":0.116754,"height":0.019584000000000046}}],"images_bbox":[],"images_bbox_not_text_overlap":[]}