{"content":[{"text":"Grenfell Tower Memorial Commission: \n Community Representatives Meeting 12 September 2019","bbox":{"left":0.229116,"top":0.04093,"width":0.54242,"height":0.037300999999999994}},{"text":"Attendees: \n Community representatives \n Nick Hurd, MP, Minister for Grenfell Victims \n GTMC Secretariat \n MHCLG","bbox":{"left":0.090363,"top":0.093952,"width":0.38758099999999995,"height":0.090244}},{"text":"Meeting purpose \n The first meeting of the community representatives to discuss and agree preliminary issues \n and interim arrangements.","bbox":{"left":0.090363,"top":0.200031,"width":0.811818,"height":0.055168999999999996}},{"text":"Introductions \n • All attendees joined Nick Hurd in a one-minute silence at the start of the meeting. \n • Nick Hurd MP opened the meeting by reminding everyone of the purpose and scope of \n the Memorial Commission and of the significance of delivering a community-led memorial \n to a national tragedy. He thanked the representatives for their commitment and \n acknowledged that the journey to a memorial would be a challenging one for both the \n community and those representing the community on the Commission.","bbox":{"left":0.090363,"top":0.271035,"width":0.819936,"height":0.12758699999999995}},{"text":"Logistics \n • The secretariat introduced an item which summarised the results from a survey on \n meeting logistics that community representatives had completed prior to the meeting. \n Community representatives agreed that Commission meetings would take place monthly \n in the Kensington area for no more than 90 minutes to 2 hours. \n Action: Secretariat to circulate the expenses policy to representatives and arrange an \n interpreter and translations. \n • The community representatives acknowledged that the community are keen to see \n progress towards a fitting memorial so agreed to hold the next meeting in one month’s \n time and then hold fortnightly meetings to ensure the Commission is fully established as \n quickly as possible. \n The community representatives agreed these interim arrangements, to be reviewed once \n the chair and the public authorities were in place.","bbox":{"left":0.090363,"top":0.414457,"width":0.819936,"height":0.233643}},{"text":"Community engagement \n • The secretariat introduced an item which set out some of the factors that the Commission \n will need to discuss in the future, to ensure that the Commission is inclusive in its \n engagement with the community. The representatives discussed the need to use different \n engagement methods, with some representatives highlighting concerns that people were \n not opening Memorial Commission letters correspondence because they were posted \n with RBKC branded envelopes. \n Action: Secretariat to explore alternative options for Memorial Commission \n correspondence. \n • There was a discussion about potential conflicts of interest between community \n representatives involving RBKC. \n Action: Secretariat to establish what would constitute a conflict of interest for the \n Commission and provide advice. \n • Concerns were raised by some community representatives about RBKC’s involvement \n on the Commission and their ability to act in good faith. Representatives suggested","bbox":{"left":0.090363,"top":0.66397,"width":0.819896,"height":0.2701380000000001}}],"images_bbox":[],"images_bbox_not_text_overlap":[]}