{"content":[{"text":"Mr. Christie said the plan is for a bump out to make a first floor master bedroom/ \n bathroom. They plan on staying in the house for a long time and would like a master \n bedroom on the first floor. The stairs are from the 1920’s and very steep. This would \n change the house from a two bedroom, two bath to a three bedroom, three bath.","bbox":{"left":0.117647,"top":0.088636,"width":0.7388440000000001,"height":0.073091}},{"text":"The CEO stated that there was a new septic system installed a few years ago. \n three bedroom septic. The CEO inspected and approved it.","bbox":{"left":0.117647,"top":0.175758,"width":0.6778040000000001,"height":0.038242}},{"text":"It is a","bbox":{"left":0.806373,"top":0.175758,"width":0.04688199999999998,"height":0.020818000000000003}},{"text":"In response to questions from Mr. Barbieri, the CEO confirmed the front road setback is \n 40 feet. Mr. Christie replied the new addition would be fully in the setback area. Other \n considerations were to build up above the sunroom, which wasn’t feasible, was less \n desirable and more expensive. A contractor suggested a bump out in the front.","bbox":{"left":0.117647,"top":0.22803,"width":0.7574509999999999,"height":0.07309100000000002}},{"text":"In response to questions from Mr. Justh, Mr. Christie said the Portico currently exists. \n Mr. McDougal said the plans show the setback is 11 feet to the Portico and 15 feet to \n the existing house. Mr. Justh stated that the 16 feet of the addition is not increasing the \n non-conformity.","bbox":{"left":0.117647,"top":0.315151,"width":0.7586470000000001,"height":0.07309099999999996}},{"text":"The chair noted there were no members of the pubic logged in to the webinar.","bbox":{"left":0.117647,"top":0.402273,"width":0.6745680000000001,"height":0.020818000000000003}},{"text":"The board discussed interpretation of increasing the non-conformity. Ben referred the \n board to the definition “Increase in nonconformity of a structure” in the Zoning \n Ordinance, on page 17. This is what this section was designed for.","bbox":{"left":0.117647,"top":0.437121,"width":0.7444310000000001,"height":0.05566600000000005}},{"text":"Mr. Mosher moved to approve the request of Spencer Christie, owner of the property at \n 1084 Sawyer Road, Map R4 Lot 46, to expand a nonconforming single-family dwelling \n based on Section 19-4-3.B.4 of the Zoning Ordinance. The motion was seconded by \n Mr. Powers. Motion was approved by a roll call vote: 7 – 0.","bbox":{"left":0.117647,"top":0.506818,"width":0.7553529999999999,"height":0.07301500000000005}},{"text":"Findings of Fact:","bbox":{"left":0.117647,"top":0.594015,"width":0.15799999999999997,"height":0.020863999999999994}},{"text":"1. The property is a conforming lot in the RA zone. \n dwelling on the property that is nonconforming.","bbox":{"left":0.117647,"top":0.628712,"width":0.44241199999999997,"height":0.038242}},{"text":"There is an existing single-family","bbox":{"left":0.571079,"top":0.628712,"width":0.28431300000000004,"height":0.020818000000000003}},{"text":"2. The existing house, built in the 1920’s, doesn’t meet the required front setback. The \n owner would like to expand the house without getting closer to the front property line.","bbox":{"left":0.117647,"top":0.680984,"width":0.756491,"height":0.038242999999999916}},{"text":"Additional Findings of Fact:","bbox":{"left":0.117647,"top":0.733409,"width":0.259275,"height":0.020863999999999994}},{"text":"1. The Zoning Board of Appeals has considered the size of the lot, the slope of the \n land, the potential for soil erosion, the location of other structures on the property and \n on adjacent properties, the location of the septic system, and the impact on views.","bbox":{"left":0.117647,"top":0.768106,"width":0.7380599999999999,"height":0.05566599999999999}},{"text":"2.","bbox":{"left":0.117647,"top":0.837803,"width":0.016332999999999986,"height":0.020818000000000003}},{"text":"The proposed structure will not increase the nonconformity of the existing structure.","bbox":{"left":0.145,"top":0.837803,"width":0.7225109999999999,"height":0.020818000000000003}},{"text":"3. The proposed structure is in compliance with the setback requirement to the greatest \n practical extent.","bbox":{"left":0.117647,"top":0.872651,"width":0.7618240000000001,"height":0.038242}},{"text":"2","bbox":{"left":0.812745,"top":0.934848,"width":0.010901999999999967,"height":0.020818000000000003}}],"images_bbox":[],"images_bbox_not_text_overlap":[]}