{"content":[{"text":"The survey results provide an understanding of the prevalence of scientists \n behaviors and attitudes regarding their data. The results of the in-depth interviews \n allow us to gain insight into the details of how scientists “do” science and how they \n handle their data. This report outlines the interview process, our analysis and key \n findings.","bbox":{"left":0.147098,"top":0.090906,"width":0.697638,"height":0.088849}},{"text":"PROCEDURE \n Interview participants were recruited from survey respondents. At the end of the \n survey, respondents were asked if they would be interested in being interviewed. \n Those that were interested were asked to provide their contact information, which \n was collected on a form that was separate from their survey responses so that their \n survey responses could not be attached to an individual. The interview procedure \n was conducted pursuant to the human subject research form approved by the \n University of Tennessee’s Institutional Review Board.","bbox":{"left":0.147098,"top":0.215325,"width":0.6953449999999999,"height":0.14204400000000006}},{"text":"IBIS researchers contacted those survey respondents who volunteered to be \n interviewed and scheduled an interview. Interviews were conducted by phone or \n face-to-face, depending on proximity and on participant preference. Interviews \n were recorded. The recordings were used to create profiles that captured the key \n information shared by the respondent and to capture some quotes. The interviews \n were not transcribed word for word because analysis was conducted on the \n thematic level to capture major concepts. Recordings were destroyed after the \n profiles were created.","bbox":{"left":0.147098,"top":0.375212,"width":0.6928049999999999,"height":0.14200500000000005}},{"text":"Most of the interview was conducted using guiding questions. Some very specific \n background questions were asked to establish the primary role of the individual \n regarding biodiversity, the kinds of biodiversity activities in which the individual \n was engaged, the participant’s primary work sector and the primary subject \n discipline. Guiding questions were then asked regarding the context of the \n biodiversity work and the respondent’s data. Respondents were asked how they \n collected and stored their data, the format of the data, the data tools used, and the \n metadata standards. Questions also addressed the respondent’s data sharing \n attitudes and behaviors. After the interview was complete, respondents were asked \n if they had any data they would like to make available via NBII.","bbox":{"left":0.147098,"top":0.535085,"width":0.7052689999999999,"height":0.177612}},{"text":"Twenty-eight interviews were completed. The following table outlines the \n demographics of interview participants.","bbox":{"left":0.147098,"top":0.730578,"width":0.6223069999999999,"height":0.03549000000000002}},{"text":"Role \n Total \n Administrator \n Field Scientist \n Lab Scientist \n Curator","bbox":{"left":0.147098,"top":0.784366,"width":0.11922700000000003,"height":0.11260599999999998}},{"text":"Total \n 28 \n 8 \n 8 \n 8 \n 4","bbox":{"left":0.289641,"top":0.784366,"width":0.043538999999999994,"height":0.11260599999999998}},{"text":"Male \n 23 \n 7 \n 7 \n 5 \n 4","bbox":{"left":0.350866,"top":0.784366,"width":0.040505999999999986,"height":0.11260599999999998}},{"text":"Female \n 5 \n 1 \n 1 \n 3 \n 0","bbox":{"left":0.409101,"top":0.784366,"width":0.06089800000000001,"height":0.11260599999999998}},{"text":"Academic \n 14 \n 1 \n 4 \n 7 \n 2","bbox":{"left":0.487533,"top":0.784366,"width":0.08133199999999996,"height":0.11260599999999998}},{"text":"Government \n 7 \n 5 \n 1 \n 0 \n 1","bbox":{"left":0.623252,"top":0.784366,"width":0.10424299999999997,"height":0.11260599999999998}},{"text":"Non-Profit \n 7 \n 2 \n 3 \n 1 \n 1","bbox":{"left":0.756046,"top":0.784366,"width":0.08881099999999997,"height":0.11260599999999998}}],"images_bbox":[],"images_bbox_not_text_overlap":[]}