{"content":[{"text":"No. 2020AP947","bbox":{"left":0.783301,"top":0.043034,"width":0.09920499999999999,"height":0.015158999999999999}},{"text":"findings are clearly erroneous: (1) that continued placement of the child in P.R.’s \n home was contrary to the child’s welfare; and (2) that the Wood County \n Department of Health Services made reasonable efforts to prevent the removal of \n the child from her home. The evidence in the record amply supports these \n findings. Accordingly, the order is affirmed.","bbox":{"left":0.176503,"top":0.097946,"width":0.7061850000000001,"height":0.143041}},{"text":"BACKGROUND","bbox":{"left":0.451454,"top":0.267336,"width":0.15564699999999998,"height":0.022664000000000017}},{"text":"¶2 On February 11, 2020, representatives of the Wood County \n Department of Health Services (Department) and the Wisconsin Rapids Police \n Department received a referral indicating that K., an eight-year-old child who \n lived with her mother and her stepfather, had been sexually abused by her \n stepfather in the family’s home. A representative from each organization \n interviewed the child that same day at the child’s school, and the child reported to \n them that her stepfather, M.R., had sexual contact with her. The Department \n representative, a social worker, met with the child’s mother, P.R., when P.R. \n arrived at school to pick up the child at the end of the day. The social worker \n “tried to develop” a plan with P.R. so that the child “would [have] no contact","bbox":{"left":0.176503,"top":0.310105,"width":0.7059750000000001,"height":0.2945809999999999}},{"text":"with” M.R., offering “a protective plan having either [M.R.] leave the residence so \n [the child] and [P.R.] could go home or having [P.R.] and [the child] leave the","bbox":{"left":0.176503,"top":0.61581,"width":0.7057120000000001,"height":0.049483000000000055}},{"text":"residence.” P.R. indicated to the social worker that “neither of those options \n would be appropriate” for several reasons: she had neither “a driver’s license nor \n a car,” M.R. was her “main transportation,” she “didn’t have the money” for M.R. \n to leave, and she “had no friends or family in the area.” When the social worker \n offered a shelter as an “alternative place for the mother and [the child] to go”, P.R. \n refused that plan. The Department removed the child from the family’s home that \n day and subsequently filed a Petition for Protection or Service (CHIPS petition) \n under WIS. STAT. ch. 48.","bbox":{"left":0.176503,"top":0.676416,"width":0.705821,"height":0.23133399999999993}},{"text":"2","bbox":{"left":0.525016,"top":0.937443,"width":0.009020000000000028,"height":0.018595000000000028}}],"images_bbox":[],"images_bbox_not_text_overlap":[]}