{"content":[{"text":"• Construction noise will only be during the daytime hours. Seniors aren’t generally a \n noisy bunch especially compared to the traffic noise that comes from Denman Road. \n The cement barrier may increase the noise level? Is there an onus on Shaun to prove \n that this laneway will lead to a noise problem?","bbox":{"left":0.116088,"top":0.091644,"width":0.7422940000000001,"height":0.07250000000000001}},{"text":"Action: Doug and John to investigate the possibility of using a berm. \n Action: Doug to work this out with the Trust staff and will confirm before the next trust \n meeting.","bbox":{"left":0.116088,"top":0.185613,"width":0.746232,"height":0.051516000000000006}},{"text":"4.2 Housing Agreement—Aging in place \n • Doug will work with the trust regarding the Tenancy Selection Document: \n 1st. That the tenancy selection document be separated from the Housing agreement. \n 2nd. If the tenancy selection document can’t be removed that there be an amendability \n clause. \n 3rd If either of these is unacceptable to the trust that we would like the following \n included: Tenants will be entitled to age in place provided they arrange for any medical \n or other personal assistance they require. \n • Indigenous people would like to have a provision included stating that they would be \n eligible. Are they asking for an exception or would the same rules apply? There are at \n least half a dozen aboriginal groups who lay claim to Denman. \n Action: Doug will clarify that they are not asking for an exception to the rules.","bbox":{"left":0.116088,"top":0.25834,"width":0.752591,"height":0.215152}},{"text":"4.3 Bev Severn’s property \n • Right of first refusal – once we purchase the property such an agreement would be in \n effect as long as the property remains in bare land state and if DCLTA decided to sell \n the land. Bev is happy to wait until we have membership approval to enter into this \n agreement as it involves a potential transaction of $100,000. \n • The land purchase price \n John suggests that the property price of $100,000 that was agreed upon 8 years ago be \n reconsidered. He proposes we find another $25,000 - $30,000. \n Notes: The agreement with Bev was renewed a few months ago. As part of the \n agreement, if either party wishes to dispute the price each will get an independent \n appraiser and the price will be half the average of the two appraised values. The \n appraisal is based on the value of the total 4-acre property with one house. \n Task: Sue and John will meet and put forward suggestions to the board.","bbox":{"left":0.116088,"top":0.494704,"width":0.7611000000000001,"height":0.23363700000000004}},{"text":"4.4 Fire Department access \n Don Luckett, Fire Chief, confirmed that the Fire Department has no problem with the 20’ \n wide laneway access, a requirement to meet one of the conditions of the Ministry of \n Transportation and Infrastructure (MoTI) for the subdivision to conclude.","bbox":{"left":0.116088,"top":0.749855,"width":0.760827,"height":0.06969800000000004}},{"text":"4.5 Agricultural Land Commission - fencing plan amendment \n The fencing and vegetation plan which was submitted to the ALC in 2019 by Harlene \n Holm and approved is not feasible. Doug wrote to the ALC and they agreed to the","bbox":{"left":0.116088,"top":0.840765,"width":0.7336500000000001,"height":0.05151500000000009}}],"images_bbox":[],"images_bbox_not_text_overlap":[]}