{"content":[{"text":"Résumé of the Website:","bbox":{"left":0.095259,"top":0.043663,"width":0.23526800000000003,"height":0.022995999999999996}},{"text":"Outlining evidence for the pronunciation “Iouo”","bbox":{"left":0.353932,"top":0.043663,"width":0.485023,"height":0.022995999999999996}},{"text":"Extrabiblical evidence: \n 1) The similarity of the divine name Iupiter with its declension Iovis-Iovi-Iovem-Iove to the \n Tetragrammaton Jod-He-Waw-He becomes obvious in the probable nominative case Iovo \n (of Iovo-pater), whereat the o of Iovo corresponds with the He of the Tetragrammaton. The \n comparison of the Latin bos-bovis (=cattle) with the Hebrew word for cattle, which is Beth- \n He-Mem-He, shows that the He was originally an o. The Greek Beta-Omicron-Omicron- \n Sigma (=cattle) proves the same, as do many comparisons of similar words in the three \n languages Hebrew, Greek and Latin. Therefore the correct original pronunciation of the \n Tetragrammaton turns out to be “Iouo”. \n 2) The historian Flavius Josephus who was of priestly descent in the Israel of Jesus´ time, and \n who therefore has heard the divine name in its correct pronunciation himself in the time of \n the temple, testifies in his scripts that the Tetragrammaton consisted of four vowels. If Jod- \n He-Wae-He are four vowels, however, then the Massoretic explanation that only consonants \n exist in the 22 Hebrew letters is only a latter development of the Hebrew language. \n Apparently Hebrew writing was originally not purely consonantal. (cp. today’s Arabic) It \n had the five basic vowels, a (=Aleph, phonetic [a:]), e (= Ayin, phonetic [e:]), i (= Jod, \n phonetic [i:]), o (= He, phonetic [o:]) and u (= Waw, phonetic [u:]). Only these 5 Hebrew \n letters come into consideration for an original vowel and many comparisons with words of \n other languages prove this (Adam, Eden, Isaak, Solomo, Aura etc. in the German spelling \n and pronunciation) \n 3) The translation of several words from Hebrew into Greek, which are transliterations as well, \n transfers the Hebrew He to a Greek Omicron. That proves, that He = o. This is the case with \n the name Jehu: Greek Jota-Omicron-Upsilon (note that Upsilon was originally an u) and \n Hebrew Jod-He-Waw-Aleph, and this is the case with the name Judah: Greek Jota-Omicron- \n Upsilon-Delta-Alpha-Sigma and Hebrew Jod-He-Waw-Daleth-He. \n 4) The vowel points of the Masorets often dot an inserted o, where a He (Elohim) is located \n right next to it, it is also often a Quamet, which sounds towards an o. Therefore, particularly \n the Digrammaton known as “Jah” suggests that “Io” is the shortened name for Iouo. \n 5) Highest Gods of primitive peoples like the Celts, Pacific aborigines of different insular races \n point to a God Io, Iao, Iou, Iouo and are therefore affirmative evidence, as is the Iupiter of \n the Romans, that still from Noah’s time after the deluge God’s true name Iouo was widely \n spread among the peoples migrating into different directions by being driven apart. \n 6) The gnostic book dating back to ca. 150 years after Jesus: „Pistis Sophia, ever since \n commonly known and rediscovered in Nag Hammadi, states in two places, that Jesus \n worshipped his heavenly father in public invoking him by the name „Iouo“. \n 7) The „Iouo“ from Pistis Sophia is obviously the more precice form of the „Iao“ often used in \n gnostic writings (ou became a, because Upsilon, the u, became an ue, phonetic [y:]). This is \n also a simple explanation for the Iao, which the historian Diodorus Siculus stated as the \n name of the Jews’ God, likewise around the time of Jesus. The Septuagint, often equipped \n with the Hebrew Tetragrammaton, contained the divine name in the scrolls of the Dead Sea, \n however, in the form „Iao“, too, which were also produced around the time of Jesus. All of \n this makes it self-evident, that “Iouo” was the original pronunciation of the name of God.","bbox":{"left":0.095259,"top":0.082033,"width":0.809747,"height":0.6906410000000001}},{"text":"Biblical Evidence: \n 1) The aforementioned Elohim being a confirmative hint for He = o turns in Jesus’ outcry to \n Iouo according to Psalm 22: “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?”, which he \n cried out in his agony hour, into an eminent proof in the Greek original text according to \n Mark. There „Eloi, Eloi“ is written. If this is a transliteration of the Hebrew-Aramaic Aleph- \n Lamed-He-Jod, then it straightaway proves, that He = o, which leads to Iouo as the \n Tetragrammaton’s pronunciation.","bbox":{"left":0.095259,"top":0.786712,"width":0.809634,"height":0.11707900000000004}},{"text":"1","bbox":{"left":0.494943,"top":0.934802,"width":0.010079999999999978,"height":0.01901200000000003}}],"images_bbox":[],"images_bbox_not_text_overlap":[]}