{"content":[{"text":"residents took the opportunity to comment on other matters besides those associated \n with Memorial Park improvements.","bbox":{"left":0.151311,"top":0.067819,"width":0.697607,"height":0.032195}},{"text":"In terms of electors the rate of return Parish-wide was approximately 2%. All replies \n appeared to come from adults. Most replies came from Shevington village, where the \n vast majority approve of the project and agreed to both taking out a loan and raising the \n precept to pay for it. A similar pattern emerged in Appley Bridge, Shevington Vale \n and Gathurst.","bbox":{"left":0.151311,"top":0.117009,"width":0.697859,"height":0.081338}},{"text":"In Shevington Moor 50% of the responders support the project. Three approve of a \n loan being taken out, but only two of those agree to a precept increase. The remaining \n 50% either do not know whether they approve or are opposed to the project.","bbox":{"left":0.151311,"top":0.215342,"width":0.697657,"height":0.04856000000000002}},{"text":"In Crooke the opposition to the project is unanimous, although some comments make \n it clear that this largely due to fears that the outflow of surface water from the park will \n have an impact on Crooke by increasing flood risk for the village.","bbox":{"left":0.151311,"top":0.280933,"width":0.6976640000000001,"height":0.04855900000000002}}],"images_bbox":[],"images_bbox_not_text_overlap":[]}