{"content":[{"text":"measure is effective. This requires that each case is assessed individually and \n that alternatives to detention are always prioritised. This is consistent with \n language from the Return Directive, CJEU jurisprudence and Council of Europe \n guidance.","bbox":{"left":0.24117,"top":0.080568,"width":0.6200990000000001,"height":0.069627}},{"text":"EuroMed Rights estimated that in Italy, the implementation of the Asylum \n Procedures Regulation ( APR) would require multiplying the number of places \n in detention facilities by 7,5 times - 50 in situations of crisis. Beyond evident \n concerns on the humanitarian consequences, it is also unclear how this provision \n can be legitimate under alleged goals of cost-efficiency.","bbox":{"left":0.24117,"top":0.168667,"width":0.62011,"height":0.08744400000000002}},{"text":"We recommend: \n • Deleting the return border procedure (art. 41a).","bbox":{"left":0.24117,"top":0.284652,"width":0.40499799999999997,"height":0.04199600000000003}},{"text":"•","bbox":{"left":0.255456,"top":0.335024,"width":0.006315999999999988,"height":0.016176000000000024}},{"text":"Ensuring that a detention order can only be issued based on an individualised \n assessment and if no other sufficient but less coercive measures can be \n applied effectively in a specific case.","bbox":{"left":0.274506,"top":0.335024,"width":0.5868120000000001,"height":0.05181000000000002}},{"text":"•","bbox":{"left":0.255456,"top":0.39521,"width":0.006315999999999988,"height":0.016176000000000024}},{"text":"Ensuring that any decision affecting individuals’ right to liberty is ordered \n and approved by a judge or other judicial authority and subject to period \n reviews.","bbox":{"left":0.274506,"top":0.39521,"width":0.586789,"height":0.05181000000000002}},{"text":"•","bbox":{"left":0.255456,"top":0.455396,"width":0.006315999999999988,"height":0.016176000000000024}},{"text":"Amending article 53 to ensure access to effective remedy against a detention \n order.","bbox":{"left":0.274506,"top":0.455396,"width":0.5867660000000001,"height":0.033992999999999995}},{"text":"•","bbox":{"left":0.255456,"top":0.497765,"width":0.006315999999999988,"height":0.016175999999999968}},{"text":"Ensuring the right to free legal aid.","bbox":{"left":0.274506,"top":0.497765,"width":0.26933900000000005,"height":0.016175999999999968}},{"text":"Promoting voluntary return:","bbox":{"left":0.24117,"top":0.558067,"width":0.289995,"height":0.017251000000000016}},{"text":"Voluntary returns should always be preferred above forced returns: they are \n more humane, more durable and cheaper. Voluntary departures constitute, \n according to Frontex, around 50 % of the total number of returns in the EU. \n However, it takes time to prepare one’s return, both physically and mentally. For \n this reason, it is essential to set a minimum time period for voluntary departure.","bbox":{"left":0.24117,"top":0.594002,"width":0.6201319999999999,"height":0.08744399999999997}},{"text":"PICUM","bbox":{"left":0.043638,"top":0.654422,"width":0.11790799999999999,"height":0.215986}},{"text":"We recommend: \n • Granting a period for voluntary departure of at least 30 days (art. 41a§5).","bbox":{"left":0.24117,"top":0.709983,"width":0.601511,"height":0.04199599999999992}},{"text":"Ensuring that children are not detained:","bbox":{"left":0.24117,"top":0.794295,"width":0.4365359999999999,"height":0.021028000000000047}},{"text":"By allowing the detention – potentially up to 24 weeks (40 weeks in situations \n of crisis) – of children above 12 years old, as well as younger children and \n unaccompanied children “for national security reasons”, the proposed APR \n violates international and regional standards that clearly consider child","bbox":{"left":0.24117,"top":0.832756,"width":0.620131,"height":0.06962699999999988}},{"text":"2","bbox":{"left":0.850046,"top":0.936097,"width":0.014191999999999982,"height":0.01689099999999999}}],"images_bbox":[],"images_bbox_not_text_overlap":[]}