{"content":[{"text":"Case 1:21-cv-22441-RNS","bbox":{"left":0.099771,"top":0.014655,"width":0.224431,"height":0.016926999999999998}},{"text":"Document 5","bbox":{"left":0.340477,"top":0.014655,"width":0.10567000000000004,"height":0.016926999999999998}},{"text":"Entered on FLSD Docket 07/09/2021","bbox":{"left":0.462438,"top":0.014655,"width":0.32131599999999993,"height":0.016926999999999998}},{"text":"Page 1 of 2","bbox":{"left":0.800046,"top":0.014655,"width":0.10019900000000004,"height":0.016926999999999998}},{"text":"UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \n SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA \n MIAMI DIVISION \n CASE NO.: 1:21-CV-22441-SCOLA, JR./GOODMAN","bbox":{"left":0.269118,"top":0.091574,"width":0.454258,"height":0.06905199999999999}},{"text":"DONALD J. TRUMP, the Forty- Fifth \n President of the United States, \n INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF A \n CLASS OF PERSONS SIMILARLY \n SITUATED,","bbox":{"left":0.110294,"top":0.178695,"width":0.353278,"height":0.086476}},{"text":"Plaintiff and the Class,","bbox":{"left":0.169118,"top":0.283241,"width":0.17872300000000002,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"vs.","bbox":{"left":0.110294,"top":0.300665,"width":0.022353000000000012,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"TWITTER, INC., and JACK DORSEY,","bbox":{"left":0.110294,"top":0.335513,"width":0.314706,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"Defendants.","bbox":{"left":0.169118,"top":0.370362,"width":0.094312,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"/","bbox":{"left":0.438725,"top":0.387786,"width":0.005448000000000008,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION","bbox":{"left":0.286765,"top":0.422635,"width":0.402592,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"Donald","bbox":{"left":0.169118,"top":0.457483,"width":0.05774499999999999,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"J.","bbox":{"left":0.237647,"top":0.457483,"width":0.012548999999999977,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"Trump,","bbox":{"left":0.260882,"top":0.457483,"width":0.058333000000000024,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"45th","bbox":{"left":0.33,"top":0.457483,"width":0.034804,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"President","bbox":{"left":0.375588,"top":0.457483,"width":0.07299700000000003,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"of","bbox":{"left":0.459314,"top":0.457483,"width":0.016332999999999986,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"the","bbox":{"left":0.486471,"top":0.457483,"width":0.023997000000000046,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"United","bbox":{"left":0.521176,"top":0.457483,"width":0.053431000000000006,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"States,","bbox":{"left":0.585392,"top":0.457483,"width":0.05166700000000002,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"et","bbox":{"left":0.647745,"top":0.457483,"width":0.014172999999999991,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"al.,","bbox":{"left":0.672745,"top":0.457483,"width":0.025000000000000022,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"serves","bbox":{"left":0.708529,"top":0.457483,"width":0.048904999999999976,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"this","bbox":{"left":0.768235,"top":0.457483,"width":0.02831499999999998,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"notice","bbox":{"left":0.807351,"top":0.457483,"width":0.047918000000000016,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"of","bbox":{"left":0.865978,"top":0.457483,"width":0.016333000000000042,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"constitutional question challenging the constitutionality of Section 230 of the Communications","bbox":{"left":0.110294,"top":0.492332,"width":0.771944,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"Decency Act for the following reasons:","bbox":{"left":0.110294,"top":0.52718,"width":0.30878099999999997,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"1.","bbox":{"left":0.110294,"top":0.561953,"width":0.014705999999999997,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"Section 230(c)(1) and 230(c)(2) were deliberately enacted by Congress to induce,","bbox":{"left":0.220588,"top":0.561953,"width":0.639804,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"encourage, and promote social medial companies to accomplish an objective—the censorship of","bbox":{"left":0.110294,"top":0.596801,"width":0.754566,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"supposedly “objectionable” but constitutionally protected speech on the Internet—that Congress","bbox":{"left":0.110294,"top":0.63165,"width":0.7553759999999999,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"could not constitutionally accomplish itself.","bbox":{"left":0.110294,"top":0.666498,"width":0.34382399999999996,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"2.","bbox":{"left":0.110294,"top":0.701347,"width":0.014705999999999997,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"Congress","bbox":{"left":0.220588,"top":0.701347,"width":0.073023,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"cannot","bbox":{"left":0.307157,"top":0.701347,"width":0.05231000000000002,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"lawfully","bbox":{"left":0.373039,"top":0.701347,"width":0.065392,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"induce,","bbox":{"left":0.451961,"top":0.701347,"width":0.05715699999999996,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"encourage","bbox":{"left":0.522647,"top":0.701347,"width":0.08066399999999996,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"or","bbox":{"left":0.616765,"top":0.701347,"width":0.016333000000000042,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"promote","bbox":{"left":0.646666,"top":0.701347,"width":0.06537000000000004,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"private","bbox":{"left":0.725588,"top":0.701347,"width":0.05448699999999995,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"persons","bbox":{"left":0.793627,"top":0.701347,"width":0.05998300000000001,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"to","bbox":{"left":0.867157,"top":0.701347,"width":0.01529400000000003,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"accomplish what it is constitutionally forbidden to accomplish.” Norwood v. Harrison, 413 US 455,","bbox":{"left":0.110294,"top":0.736195,"width":0.771961,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"465 (1973).","bbox":{"left":0.110294,"top":0.771044,"width":0.09156899999999998,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"3.","bbox":{"left":0.110294,"top":0.805892,"width":0.014705999999999997,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"Section 230(c)(2) is therefore unconstitutional on its face, and Section 230(c)(1) is","bbox":{"left":0.220588,"top":0.805892,"width":0.661846,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"likewise unconstitutional insofar as it has interpreted to immunize social media companies for","bbox":{"left":0.110294,"top":0.840741,"width":0.7720210000000001,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"actions, they take to censor constitutionally protected speech.","bbox":{"left":0.110294,"top":0.875589,"width":0.48088200000000003,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"4.","bbox":{"left":0.110294,"top":0.910438,"width":0.014705999999999997,"height":0.01677899999999999}},{"text":"A copy of the complaint filed in the captioned matter is attached.","bbox":{"left":0.220588,"top":0.910438,"width":0.509608,"height":0.01677899999999999}}],"images_bbox":[],"images_bbox_not_text_overlap":[]}