  
  
WT/DS371/39  
 
7 July 2020  
(20-4649) Page: 1/2 
  Original: English  
 
 
THAILAND – CUSTOMS A ND FISCAL MEASURES O N CIGARETTES  
FROM THE PHILIPPINES  
COMMUNICATION FROM THAILAND  
The following communication, dated 3 July 2020 , was received from the delegation of Thailand with 
the request that it be circulated to the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB).  
 
_______________  
 
 
Thailand requests that the document attached to this communication be circulated to Members of 
the Dispute Settlement Body.  
 
 
_______________  
 
  WT/DS371/39  
 
- 2 - 
 
  Thailand sets forth below the content of its statement at the  DSB meeting of 29 June 2020 regarding 
Item 11 of the agenda concerning the dispute Thailand – Customs and Fiscal Measures on Cigarettes 
from the Philippines (DS371).  
 
1. Mr. Chairman, I would like to thank you for your involvement in the consultations with the 
parties in the dispute Thailand – Cigarettes , and for the opportunity to make a statement at today's 
meeting.  
2. Thailand refers to its previous statement at the DSB  meeting on 5 March 2020.  
3. For the purpose of today's meeting, Thailand wishes to reiterate, once again, that any request 
for suspension of concessions under Article 22.2 of the DSU in this dispute would be improper as the 
two compliance proceedings unde r Article 21.5 have not concluded. The two reports issued by the 
panel in these 21.5 proceedings have not been adopted by the DSB and the appeals of these reports 
by Thailand are still ongoing before the Appellate Body.  
4. The sequencing agreement signed by the Parties in this dispute states that the Philippines 
could request retaliation only after  the completion of proceedings under Article 21.5, which includes 
proceedings before the Appellate Body in case of an appeal. Given that Thailand's appeals have not 
been completed, the Philippines cannot, at this stage, request the suspension of concessions or other 
obligations under Article 22.2 of the DSU.    
5. Thailand  also wishes to reiterate that, should the Philippines, for whatever reason, take the 
position that the rules contained in the sequencing agreement are no longer applicable, this would 
release Thailand of its commitment to not object to the Philippines' re quest as being outside the 30 -
day deadline under Article 22.6 of the DSU. According to this provision, any request for suspension 
of concessions must be authorized by the DSB "within 30 days of the expiry of the reasonable period 
of time".  As the reasonab le period of time in this dispute expired on 15 May 2012, the deadline 
under Article 22.6 for authorizing the suspension of concessions expired on 15 June 2012.  
6. The Philippines has indicated that, according to the sequencing agreement, the Parties are 
under an obligation to find a prompt solution regarding any "procedural aspect" that arises 
concerning the procedures established in that agreement. Thailand disagrees with the Philippines' 
position that the Appellate Body's suspension of its work in both a ppeals constitutes a "procedural 
aspect" of the sequencing agreement.  Rather, as the Philippines has previously acknowledged, for 
example in its communication in document WT/DS371/32 dated 12 February 2020, the Appellate 
Body suspended its work due to "in stitutional constraints" as a result of insufficient number of 
Appellate Body Members. Thailand has supported, and continues to support, efforts to resolve these 
institutional constraints and encourages all WTO Members, including the Philippines, to do lik ewise.  
7. As we all know, the real issue here is the Appellate Body crisis, not any individual dispute. The 
Appellate Body crisis has imposed significant challenges on the rules -based system, including with 
respect to all pending appeals. The Philippines' previous request for suspension of concessions 
underlines the urgency of resolving the problems affecting the Appellate Body as a matter of priority 
so as to avoid unilateral actions that are contrary to Article 23 of the DSU.  As we will discuss on the 
agenda item  15 for today's meeting, Thailand fully supports the Appellate Body process and urges 
Members to move ahead with the process of selecting new Appellate Body members.  
8. Finally, as indicated during previous exchanges with the Philippines, Thailand  remains open to 
a bilateral dialogue with an aim to identify a possible solution to the substantive issues in this WTO 
dispute that is mutually acceptable to both parties.  
 
__________  