This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposedissuance of rules and regulations. Thepurpose of these notices is to give interestedpersons an opportunity to participate in therule making prior to the adoption of the finalrules.Proposed RulesFederal Register30853 
Vol. 85, No. 99 
Thursday, May 21, 2020 
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 
10 CFR Part 430 
[EERE–2017–BT–STD–0019] 
RIN 1904–AD91 
Energy Conservation Program: Energy 
Conservation Standards for Consumer Water Heaters 
AGENCY : Office of Energy Efficiency and 
Renewable Energy, Department of Energy. 
ACTION : Request for information. 
SUMMARY : The U.S. Department of 
Energy (‘‘DOE’’) is initiating an effort to determine whether to amend the current energy conservation standards for consumer water heaters. This request for information (‘‘RFI’’) solicits information from the public to help DOE determine whether amended standards for consumer water heaters would result in significant energy savings and whether such standards would be technologically feasible and economically justified. DOE welcomes written comments from the public on any subject within the scope of this document (including topics not raised in this RFI). 
DATES : Written comments and 
information are requested and will be accepted on or before July 6, 2020. 
ADDRESSES : Interested persons are 
encouraged to submit comments using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments. Alternatively, interested persons may submit comments, identified by docket number EERE–2017–BT–STD–0019, by any of the following methods: 
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 
www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments. 
2. Email: 
ConsumerWaterHeaters2017STD0019@ee.doe.gov. Include the docket number 
EERE–2017–BT–STD–0019 in the subject line of the message. 
3. Postal Mail: Appliance and 
Equipment Standards Program, U.S. Department of Energy, Building Technologies Office, Mailstop EE–5B, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585–0121. Telephone: (202) 287–1445. If possible, please submit all items on a compact disc (‘‘CD’’), in which case it is not necessary to include printed copies. 
4. Hand Delivery/Courier: Appliance 
and Equipment Standards Program, U.S. Department of Energy, Building Technologies Office, 950 L’Enfant Plaza SW, 6th Floor, Washington, DC 20024. Telephone: (202) 287–1445. If possible, please submit all items on a CD, in which case it is not necessary to include printed copies. 
No telefacsimilies (faxes) will be 
accepted. For detailed instructions on submitting comments and additional information on this process, see section III of this document. 
Docket: The docket for this activity, 
which includes Federal Register notices, comments, and other supporting documents/materials, is available for review at http://www.regulations.gov. All documents in 
the docket are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index. However, 
some documents listed in the index, such as those containing information that is exempt from public disclosure, may not be publicly available. 
The docket web page can be found at: 
https://www.regulations.gov/ docket?D=EERE-2017-BT-STD-0019. The docket web page contains instructions on how to access all documents, including public comments, in the docket. See section III for information on how to submit comments through http://www.regulations.gov. 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : 
Ms. Catherine Rivest, U.S. Department 
of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies Office, EE–5B, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585–0121. Telephone: (202) 586– 7335. Email: ApplianceStandardsQuestions@ee.doe.gov. 
Mr. Eric Stas, U.S. Department of 
Energy, Office of the General Counsel, GC–33, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585–0121. Telephone: (202) 586–5827. Email: Eric.Stas@hq.doe.gov. 
For further information on how to 
submit a comment, or review other public comments and the docket contact the Appliance and Equipment Standards Program staff at (202) 287– 1445 or by email: ApplianceStandardsQuestions@ee.doe.gov. 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : 
Table of Contents 
I. Introduction 
A. Authority and Background 
B. Rulemaking Process 
II. Request for Information and Comments 
A. Products Covered by This Analysis 
B. Test Procedure C. Market and Technology Assessment 1. Product Classes 2. Technology Assessment D. Screening Analysis E. Engineering Analysis 1. Representative Product Characteristics 2. Efficiency Levels a. Baseline Efficiency Levels b. Intermediate Energy Efficiency Levels c. Maximum Technologically Feasible 
Efficiency Levels 
3. Technology Pathway a. Gas-Fired Storage Water Heaters b. Electric Storage Water Heaters c. Oil-Fired Storage Water Heaters d. Tabletop Water Heaters e. Gas-Fired Instantaneous Water Heaters f. Electric Instantaneous Water Heaters g. Oil-Fired Instantaneous Water Heaters h. Grid-Enabled Water Heaters 4. Manufacturer Production Costs and 
Manufacturer Selling Prices 
F. Markups Analysis 1. Distribution Channels a. Replacement and New Owner b. New Construction 2. Markups G. Energy Use Analysis 1. Building Sample 2. Hot Water Use 3. Determination of Consumer Water 
Heating Energy Use 
H. Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period 
Analysis 
1. Total Installed Cost 2. Operating Costs I. Shipments Analysis J. National Impact Analysis K. Manufacturer Impact Analysis L. Other Energy Conservation Standards 
Topics 
1. Market Failures 2. Market-Based Approaches to Energy 
Conservation Standards 
III. Submission of Comments 
I. Introduction 
Consumer water heaters are included 
in the list of ‘‘covered products’’ for 
which DOE is authorized to establish and amend energy conservation standards and test procedures. (42 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 May 20, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM 21MYP130854 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 99 / Thursday, May 21, 2020 / Proposed Rules 
1All references to EPCA in this document refer 
to the statute as amended through America’s Water 
Infrastructure Act of 2018, Public Law 115–270 (Oct. 23, 2018). 
2For editorial reasons, upon codification in the 
U.S. Code, Part B was redesignated Part A. U.S.C. 6292(a)(4)) DOE’s energy 
conservation standards for consumer water heaters are prescribed in title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 
(‘‘CFR’’) part 430, section 32(d). The following sections discuss DOE’s authority to establish and amend energy conservation standards for consumer water heaters, as well as relevant background information regarding DOE’s evaluation of energy conservation standards for this product. 
A. Authority and Background 
The Energy Policy and Conservation 
Act, as amended (‘‘EPCA’’),
1Public Law 
94–163 (42 U.S.C. 6291–6317, as 
codified), among other things, authorizes DOE to regulate the energy efficiency of a number of consumer products and industrial equipment. Title III, Part B
2of EPCA established the 
Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products Other Than Automobiles. These products include consumer water heaters, the subject of this document. (42 U.S.C. 6292(a)(4)) EPCA prescribed energy conservation standards for these products and directed DOE to conduct two cycles of rulemakings to determine whether to amend these standards. (42 U.S.C. 6295(e)(1) and (4)) 
Under EPCA, DOE’s energy 
conservation program consists essentially of four parts: (1) Testing, (2) labeling, (3) Federal energy conservation standards, and (4) certification and enforcement procedures. Relevant provisions of EPCA specifically include definitions (42 U.S.C. 6291), test procedures (42 U.S.C. 6293), labeling provisions (42 U.S.C. 6294), energy conservation standards (42 U.S.C. 6295), and the authority to require information and reports from manufacturers (42 U.S.C. 6296). 
Federal energy efficiency 
requirements for covered products established under EPCA generally supersede State laws and regulations concerning energy conservation testing, labeling, and standards. (42 U.S.C. 6297(a)–(c)) DOE may, however, grant waivers of Federal preemption in limited instances for particular State laws or regulations, in accordance with the procedures and other provisions set 
forth under 42 U.S.C. 6297(d). 
DOE completed the first of these 
rulemaking cycles on January 17, 2001 by publishing amended performance standards for consumer water heaters. 66 FR 4474 (establishing amended standards to apply starting on January 20, 2004) (‘‘January 2001 Final Rule’’). Additionally, DOE completed a second rulemaking cycle to amend the standards for consumer water heaters by publishing a final rule on April 16, 2010. 75 FR 20112 (establishing amended standards to apply starting on April 16, 2015) (‘‘April 2010 Final Rule’’). As directed by EPCA (42 U.S.C. 6295(e)(4)(E)), on July 11, 2014, DOE published a final rule amending the test procedure for consumer water heaters to 
change the efficiency metric from energy factor (‘‘EF’’) to uniform energy factor (‘‘UEF’’). 79 FR 40542. The existing EF-based energy conservation standards were then translated from EF to UEF in a separate DOE conversion factor final rule that established a method for converting EF to UEF for water heater basic models that were previously in existence. 81 FR 96204 (Dec. 29, 2016) (‘‘December 2016 Conversion Factor Final Rule’’). The current energy conservation standards are located at 10 CFR 430.32(d). The currently applicable DOE test procedures for consumer water heaters appear at 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, appendix E (‘‘Appendix E’’). 
EPCA also requires that, not later than 
6 years after the issuance of any final rule establishing or amending a standard, DOE evaluate the energy conservation standards for each type of covered product, including those at issue here, and publish either a notice of determination that the standards do not need to be amended, or a NOPR including new proposed energy conservation standards (proceeding to a final rule, as appropriate). (42 U.S.C. 6295(m)(1)) EPCA further provides that, not later than 3 years after the issuance of a final determination not to amend standards, DOE must publish either a notice of determination that standards for the product do not need to be amended, or a NOPR including new proposed energy conservation standards (proceeding to a final rule, as appropriate). (42 U.S.C. 6295(m)(3)(B)) DOE must make the analysis on which the determination is based publicly available and provide an opportunity for written comment. (42 U.S.C. 6295(m)(2)) In making a determination, DOE must evaluate whether more-stringent standards would: (1) Yield a significant savings in energy use; (2) be technologically feasible; and (3) be cost- effective under 42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(B)(i)(II). (42 U.S.C. 6295(m)(1)(A)) 
DOE is publishing this RFI to collect 
data and information to inform its decision consistent with its obligations under EPCA. 
B. Rulemaking Process 
DOE must follow specific statutory 
criteria for prescribing new or amended 
standards for covered products. EPCA requires that any new or amended energy conservation standard be designed to achieve the maximum improvement in energy or water efficiency that is technologically feasible and economically justified. (42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(A)) To determine whether a standard is economically justified, EPCA requires that DOE determine whether the benefits of the standard exceed its burdens by considering, to the greatest extent practicable, the following seven factors: 
(1) The economic impact of the 
standard on the manufacturers and consumers of the affected products; 
(2) The savings in operating costs 
throughout the estimated average life of the product compared to any increases in the initial cost, or maintenance expenses; 
(3) The total projected amount of 
energy and water (if applicable) savings likely to result directly from the standard; 
(4) Any lessening of the utility or the 
performance of the products likely to result from the standard; 
(5) The impact of any lessening of 
competition, as determined in writing by the Attorney General, that is likely to result from the standard; 
(6) The need for national energy and 
water conservation; and 
(7) Other factors the Secretary of 
Energy (Secretary) considers relevant. 
(42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(B)(i)(I)–(VII)) 
DOE fulfills these and other 
applicable requirements by conducting 
a series of analyses throughout the rulemaking process. Table I.1 shows the individual analyses that are performed to satisfy each of the requirements within EPCA. 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 May 20, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM 21MYP130855 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 99 / Thursday, May 21, 2020 / Proposed Rules 
TABLE I.1—EPCA R EQUIREMENTS AND CORRESPONDING DOE A NALYSIS  
EPCA requirement Corresponding DOE analysis 
Significant Energy Savings .............................................................................................. •Shipments Analysis. 
•National Impact Analysis. 
•Energy and Water Use Determination. 
Technological Feasibility .................................................................................................. •Market and Technology Assessment. 
•Screening Analysis. 
•Engineering Analysis. 
Economic Justification: 
1. Economic impact on manufacturers and consumers ........................................... •Manufacturer Impact Analysis. 
•Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analysis. 
•Life-Cycle Cost Subgroup Analysis. 
•Shipments Analysis. 
2. Lifetime operating cost savings compared to increased cost for the product ..... •Mark-ups for Product Price Determination. 
•Energy and Water Use Determination. 
•Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analysis. 
3. Total projected energy savings ............................................................................ •Shipments Analysis. 
•National Impact Analysis. 
4. Impact on utility or performance ........................................................................... •Screening Analysis. 
•Engineering Analysis. 
5. Impact of any lessening of competition ................................................................ •Manufacturer Impact Analysis. 
6. Need for national energy and water conservation ............................................... •Shipments Analysis. 
•National Impact Analysis. 
7. Other factors the Secretary considers relevant ................................................... •Employment Impact Analysis. 
•Utility Impact Analysis. 
•Emissions Analysis. 
•Monetization of Emission Reductions Benefits. 
•Regulatory Impact Analysis. 
As detailed throughout this RFI, DOE 
is publishing this document seeking 
input and data from interested parties to aid in the development of the technical analyses on which DOE will ultimately 
rely to determine whether (and if so, how) to amend the standards for consumer water heaters. 
II. Request for Information and 
Comments 
In the following sections, DOE has 
identified a variety of issues on which it seeks input to aid in the development of the technical and economic analyses regarding whether amended standards for consumer water heaters may be warranted. Additionally, DOE welcomes comments on other issues relevant to the conduct of this rulemaking that may not specifically be identified in this document. In particular, DOE notes that under Executive Order 13771, ‘‘Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs,’’ Executive Branch agencies such as DOE are directed to manage the costs associated with the imposition of expenditures required to comply with Federal regulations. See 82 FR 9339 (Feb. 3, 2017). Consistent with that Executive Order, DOE encourages the public to provide input on measures DOE could take to lower the cost of its energy conservation standard rulemakings, recordkeeping and reporting requirements, and compliance and certification requirements applicable to consumer water heaters while remaining consistent with the 
requirements of EPCA. 
In addition, DOE seeks comment on 
whether there have been sufficient 
technological or market changes since the most recent standards update that may justify a new rulemaking to consider more-stringent standards. Specifically, DOE seeks data and information that could enable the agency to determine whether DOE should propose a ‘‘no new standard’’ determination because a more-stringent standard: (1) Would not result in a significant savings of energy; (2) is not technologically feasible; (3) is not economically justified, or (4) any combination of the foregoing. 
Finally, DOE notes that it recently 
published an RFI on the emerging smart technology appliance and equipment market. 83 FR 46886 (Sept. 17, 2018). In that RFI, DOE sought information to better understand market trends and issues in the emerging market for appliances and commercial equipment that incorporate smart technology. DOE’s intent in issuing the RFI was to ensure that DOE did not inadvertently impede such innovation in fulfilling its statutory obligations in setting efficiency standards for covered products and equipment. DOE seeks comments, data, and information on the issues presented in that RFI as they may be applicable to consumer water heaters. A. Products Covered by This Analysis 
This RFI covers those products that 
meet the definitions for consumer water 
heaters, as codified at 10 CFR 430.2. The definitions for consumer water heaters were most recently amended in a standards final rule that defined the term ‘‘grid-enabled water heater.’’ 80 FR 48004 (August 11, 2015). 
Generally, DOE defines a ‘‘water 
heater,’’ consistent with EPCA’s definition, as a product which utilizes oil, gas, or electricity to heat potable water for use outside the heater upon demand, including— 
(a) Storage type units which heat and 
store water at a thermostatically controlled temperature, including gas storage water heaters with an input of 75,000 Btu per hour or less, oil storage water heaters with an input of 105,000 Btu per hour or less, and electric storage water heaters with an input of 12 kilowatts or less; 
(b) Instantaneous type units which 
heat water but contain no more than one gallon of water per 4,000 Btu per hour of input, including gas instantaneous water heaters with an input of 200,000 Btu per hour or less, oil instantaneous water heaters with an input of 210,000 Btu per hour or less, and electric instantaneous water heaters with an input of 12 kilowatts or less; and 
(c) Heat pump type units, with a 
maximum current rating of 24 amperes at a voltage no greater than 250 volts, which are products designed to transfer 
thermal energy from one temperature 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 May 20, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM 21MYP130856 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 99 / Thursday, May 21, 2020 / Proposed Rules 
level to a higher temperature level for 
the purpose of heating water, including all ancillary equipment such as fans, storage tanks, pumps, or controls necessary for the device to perform its function. 
10 CFR 430.2; (42 U.S.C. 6291(27)) 
In addition, at 10 CFR 430.2, DOE 
further defines several specific 
categories of consumer water heaters, as follows: 
(1) ‘‘Electric instantaneous water 
heater’’ means a water heater that uses electricity as the energy source, has a nameplate input rating of 12 kW or less, and contains no more than one gallon of water per 4,000 Btu per hour of input. 
(2) ‘‘Electric storage water heater’’ 
means a water heater that uses electricity as the energy source, has a nameplate input rating of 12 kW or less, and contains more than one gallon of water per 4,000 Btu per hour of input. 
(3) ‘‘Gas-fired instantaneous water 
heater’’ means a water heater that uses gas as the main energy source, has a nameplate input rating less than 200,000 Btu/h, and contains no more than one gallon of water per 4,000 Btu per hour of input. 
(4) ‘‘Gas-fired storage water heater’’ 
means a water heater that uses gas as the main energy source, has a nameplate input rating of 75,000 Btu/h or less, and contains more than one gallon of water per 4,000 Btu per hour of input. 
(5) ‘‘Grid-enabled water heater’’ 
means an electric resistance water heater that— 
(a) Has a rated storage tank volume of 
more than 75 gallons; 
(b) Is manufactured on or after April 
16, 2015; 
(c) Is equipped at the point of 
manufacture with an activation lock and; 
(d) Bears a permanent label applied 
by the manufacturer that— 
(i) Is made of material not adversely 
affected by water; 
(ii) Is attached by means of non-water- 
soluble adhesive; and 
(iii) Advises purchasers and end-users 
of the intended and appropriate use of the product with the following notice printed in 16.5 point Arial Narrow Bold font: ‘‘IMPORTANT INFORMATION: This water heater is intended only for use as part of an electric thermal storage or demand response program. It will not provide adequate hot water unless enrolled in such a program and activated by your utility company or another program operator. Confirm the availability of a program in your local area before purchasing or installing this product.’’ 
(6) ‘‘Oil-fired instantaneous water 
heater’’ means a water heater that uses oil as the main energy source, has a 
nameplate input rating of 210,000 Btu/ h or less, and contains no more than one gallon of water per 4,000 Btu per hour of input. 
(7) ‘‘Oil-fired storage water heater’’ 
means a water heater that uses oil as the main energy source, has a nameplate input rating of 105,000 Btu/h or less, and contains more than one gallon of water per 4,000 Btu per hour of input. 
As stated in section I of this RFI, 
EPCA prescribed energy conservation standards for all consumer water heaters (i.e., those that meet the definition of 
‘‘water heater’’ above). For the purpose of this RFI and the evaluation of potential amended energy conservation standards, DOE is considering all consumer water heaters, as defined by EPCA. 
DOE previously established a separate 
product class and definition for ‘‘tabletop water heaters,’’ which required such products to be in a rectangular box enclosure designed to slide into a kitchen countertop space with typical dimensions of 36 inches high, 25 inches deep, and 24 inches wide. 66 FR 4474, 4497 (Jan. 17, 2001) The definition of ‘‘tabletop water heater’’ was established in appendix E, 
but a subsequent relocation of definitions removed that definition from appendix E without re-establishing it in 10 CFR 430.2. 
Issue A.1 DOE requests feedback on 
whether the previous definition for ‘‘tabletop water heater’’ is still appropriate, whether such products should continue to be considered separately from other classes of consumer water heaters, and whether such definition should be added to the list of definitions in 10 CFR 430.2. 
B. Test Procedure 
DOE’s existing test procedures for 
consumer water heaters are set forth at 
10 CFR part 430, subpart B, Appendix E—Uniform Test Method for Measuring the Energy Consumption of Water Heaters. DOE’s consumer water heater test procedure provides methods for determining the first-hour rating (‘‘FHR’’), maximum gallons per minute (‘‘max GPM’’), and UEF for consumer gas-fired, oil-fired, and electric storage and instantaneous water heaters. As stated in section I.A of this document, the test procedure for consumer water heaters was updated in July 2014 to transition from the EF metric to the UEF metric, and to expand the scope of the test method to cover all covered consumer water heaters, as well as certain commercial water heaters (i.e., those meeting the definition of a ‘‘residential-duty commercial water heater’’). 79 FR 40542 (July 11, 2014). 
The major difference between the EF and UEF metrics is that the EF test consists of six hot water draws of equal volume and flow rate followed by a standby period for all water heaters, while the UEF test procedure consists of varying draw patterns depending on the delivery capacity of the consumer water heater, which include between 9 and 14 draws of varying volumes and flow rates. Due to the difference in draw pattern as well as other differences established in the UEF test method (e.g., changes to the set point temperature and method for setting the thermostat) the EF and UEF values are not directly comparable. For this evaluation of potential amended energy conservation standards, DOE will use UEF as the basis for its analysis. 
C. Market and Technology Assessment 
The market and technology 
assessment that DOE routinely conducts 
when analyzing the impacts of a potential new or amended energy conservation standard provides information about the consumer water heater industry that will be used in DOE’s analysis throughout the rulemaking process. DOE uses qualitative and quantitative information to characterize the structure of the industry and market. DOE identifies manufacturers, estimates market shares 
and trends, addresses regulatory and non-regulatory initiatives intended to improve energy efficiency or reduce energy consumption, and explores the potential for efficiency improvements in the design and manufacturing of consumer water heaters. DOE also reviews product literature, industry publications, and company websites. Additionally, DOE considers conducting interviews with manufacturers to improve its assessment of the market and available technologies for consumer water heaters. 
1. Product Classes 
When evaluating and establishing 
energy conservation standards, DOE 
may divide covered products into product classes by the type of energy used, or by capacity or other performance-related features that justify a different standard. (42 U.S.C. 6295(q)) In making a determination whether capacity or another performance-related feature justifies a different standard, DOE must consider such factors as the utility of the feature to the consumer and other factors DOE deems appropriate. (Id.) 
For consumer water heaters, the 
current energy conservation standards specified at 10 CFR 430.32(d) vary based 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 May 20, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM 21MYP130857 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 99 / Thursday, May 21, 2020 / Proposed Rules 
on fuel type (gas-fired, oil-fired, or 
electric), product category (storage, instantaneous, tabletop, grid-enabled), stored volume, and capacity (draw pattern). The December 2016 Conversion 
Factor Final Rule converted the EF- based energy conservation standards established in the January 2001 and April 2010 Final Rules to ratings based on the UEF metric. 81 FR 96204 (Dec. 29, 2016). Table II.1 describes the product classes and which standards apply to each range of rated storage volume and input rate. 
TABLE II.1—D ESCRIPTION OF APPLICABLE ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS  
Product class Rated storage volume Draw pattern * Energy conservation standard ** 
Gas-fired Storage Water Heater .............. <20 gal .................................................... ........................ EF = 0.6200¥0.0019 × Vr. 
≥20 gal and ≤55 gal ................................ Very Small ..... UEF = 0.3456¥0.0020 × Vr. 
Low ................ UEF = 0.5982¥0.0019 × Vr. 
Medium .......... UEF = 0.6483¥0.0017 × Vr. 
High ............... UEF = 0.6920¥0.0013 × Vr. 
>55 gal and ≤100 gal .............................. Very Small ..... UEF = 0.6470¥0.0006 × Vr. 
Low ................ UEF = 0.7689¥0.0005 × Vr. 
Medium .......... UEF = 0.7897¥0.0004 × Vr. 
High ............... UEF = 0.8072¥0.0003 × Vr. 
>100 gal .................................................. ........................ EF = 0.6200¥0.0019 × Vr. 
Oil-fired Storage Water Heater ................ ≤50 gal .................................................... Very Small ..... UEF = 0.2509¥0.0012 × Vr. 
Low ................ UEF = 0.5330¥0.0016 × Vr. 
Medium .......... UEF = 0.6078¥0.0016 × Vr. 
High ............... UEF = 0.6815¥0.0014 × Vr. 
>50 gal .................................................... ........................ EF = 0.5900¥0.0019 × Vr. 
Electric Storage Water Heater ................. <20 gal .................................................... ........................ EF = 0.9300¥0.00132 × Vr.† 
≥20 gal and ≤55 gal ................................ Very Small ..... UEF = 0.8808¥0.0008 × Vr. 
Low ................ UEF = 0.9254¥0.0003 × Vr. 
Medium .......... UEF = 0.9307¥0.0002 × Vr. 
High ............... UEF = 0.9349¥0.0001 × Vr. 
>55 gal and ≤120 gal .............................. Very Small ..... UEF = 1.9236¥0.0011 × Vr. 
Low ................ UEF = 2.0440¥0.0011 × Vr. 
Medium .......... UEF = 2.1171¥0.0011 × Vr. 
High ............... UEF = 2.2418¥0.0011 × Vr. 
>120 gal .................................................. ........................ EF = 0.9300¥0.00132 × Vr.† 
Tabletop Storage ...................................... <20 gal .................................................... ........................ EF = 0.9300¥0.00132 × Vr.† 
≥20 gal and ≤120 gal .............................. Very Small ..... UEF = 0.6323¥0.0058 × Vr. 
Low ................ UEF = 0.9188¥0.0031 × Vr. 
Medium .......... UEF = 0.9577¥0.0023 × Vr. 
High ............... UEF = 0.9884¥0.0016 × Vr. 
>120 gal .................................................. ........................ EF = 0.9300¥0.00132 × Vr.† 
Gas-fired Instantaneous Water Heater .... <2 gal and >50,000 Btu/h ....................... Very Small ..... UEF = 0.80. 
Low ................ UEF = 0.81. 
Medium .......... UEF = 0.81. 
High ............... UEF = 0.81. 
≥2 gal or ≤50,000 Btu/h .......................... ........................ EF = 0.6200¥0.0019 × Vr. 
Oil-fired Instantaneous Water Heater ...... All ............................................................ ........................ EF = 0.5900¥0.0019 × Vr. 
Electric Instantaneous Water Heater ....... <2 gal ...................................................... Very Small ..... UEF = 0.91 . 
Low ................ UEF = 0.91. 
Medium .......... UEF = 0.91. 
High ............... UEF = 0.92. 
≥2 gal ...................................................... ........................ EF = 0.9300¥0.00132 × Vr. 
Grid-Enabled Water Heater ..................... >75 gal .................................................... Very Small ..... UEF = 1 .0136¥0.0028 × Vr. 
Low ................ UEF = 0.9984¥0.0014 × Vr. 
Medium .......... UEF = 0.9853¥0.0010 × Vr. 
High ............... UEF = 0.9720¥0.0007 × Vr. 
* Draw patterns vary based on hot water delivery capacity in the UEF test procedure, while the EF test procedure relies on a single draw pat-
tern for all water heaters. As a result, UEF values and UEF energy conservation standards are different based on the draw pattern, while EF val-
ues and energy conservation standards are not. 
** Energy conservation standards based on EF were established by EPCA. Energy conservation standards based on UEF were established in 
the April 2010 Final Rule (75 FR 20112 (April 16, 2010)) and translated to equivalent UEF standards in the December 2016 Conversion Factor Final Rule (81 FR 96204 (Dec. 29, 2016)). 
† EPCA initially established an energy conservation standard at 0.95 ¥.00132 × V
rfor electric storage water heaters. In the test procedure and 
energy conservation standards final rule that adopted the EF metric, DOE changed the standard to 0.93¥.00132 × Vrto account for the changes 
to the test method for electric storage water heaters. 55 FR 42162, 42177 (Oct. 17, 1990). 
Relevant to the establishment of 
product classes, EPCA provides that the 
Secretary may not prescribe an amended or new standard for covered products if the Secretary finds (and publishes such finding) that interested persons have established by a preponderance of the evidence that the standard is likely to result in the unavailability in the United States in any covered product type (or class) of performance characteristics (including reliability), features, sizes, capacities, and volumes that are substantially the same as those generally available in the United States at the time of the Secretary’s finding. 42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(4) Where the Secretary finds such ‘‘performance characteristics (including reliability), features, sizes, capacities, and volumes’’ (collectively referred to hereafter as ‘‘features’’) to 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 May 20, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM 21MYP130858 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 99 / Thursday, May 21, 2020 / Proposed Rules 
exist, the statute provides for the 
potential of establishing separate product classes. (42 U.S.C. 6295(q)(1)) 
On November 1, 2018, DOE published 
for comment a petition for rulemaking submitted by Spire, Inc., the National Gas Supply Association, the National Propane Gas Association, the American Public Gas Association, and the American Gas Association (‘‘Gas Industry Petition’’), which in part, raised the question of whether for residential furnaces and commercial water heating equipment (and similarly situated covered products and equipment) non-condensing technology and associated venting constitutes a performance-related ‘‘feature’’ under 42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(4), as would support a separate product/equipment class under 42 U.S.C. 6295(q)(1). 83 FR 54883. The comment period on the notice of petition for rulemaking was originally set to end on January 30, 2019, but DOE received two requests from interested parties seeking an extension of the comment period in order to develop additional data relevant to the petition. DOE granted these requests in a notice published in the Federal Register on January 29, 2019, which extended the comment period until March 1, 2019. 
On July 11, 2019, following 
consideration of the Gas Industry Petition, public comments, and other information received on the petition, DOE published a notice of proposed interpretative rule (‘‘NOPIR’’), proposing to revise its interpretation of EPCA’s ‘‘features’’ provision in the context of condensing and non- condensing technology used in furnaces, commercial water heating equipment, and similarly situated appliances (where permitted by EPCA). 84 FR 33011, 33020. DOE stated that as compared to products that rely on non- condensing technology, products that use condensing technology may result in more complicated/costly installations, require physical changes to a home that impact aesthetics (e.g., by 
adding new venting into the living space or decreasing closet or other storage space), and may result in some enhanced level of fuel switching. Id. DOE also acknowledged that although energy efficiency improvements may pay for themselves over time, there is a significant increase in first-cost associated with residential furnaces and commercial water heaters using condensing technology, and for consumers with difficult installation situations (e.g., inner-city row houses) 
there would be the added cost of potentially extensive venting 
modifications. Id. DOE proposed in the 
July 2019 NOPIR to interpret the statute to provide that adoption of energy 
conservation standards that would limit the market to natural gas and/or propane furnaces, water heaters, or similarly situated products/equipment (where permitted by EPCA) that use condensing combustion technology would result in the unavailability of a performance related feature within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(4). 84 FR 33011, 33021 (July 11, 2019). DOE is currently considering the comments received on the July 2019 NOPIR, after which the Department will determine whether and how to proceed with the interpretive rule in response to the Gas Industry Petition. 
DOE is evaluating all the product 
classes for consumer water heaters presented in Table II.1 of this RFI. DOE may also consider additional product classes based on any performance- related features that justify the establishment of a different energy conservation standard, or it may consider consolidating product classes in appropriate cases. (42 U.S.C. 6295(q)) In light of the July 2019 NOPIR, DOE plans to evaluate the effects of treating non-condensing technology and associated venting as a performance- related ‘‘feature’’ under 42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(4), as would support a separate product class for consumer water heaters under 42 U.S.C. 6295(q)(1). 
Issue C.1 DOE requests feedback on 
the current consumer water heater product classes and whether changes to these individual product classes and their descriptions should be made or whether certain classes should be separated or merged. Specifically, with regard to consumer water heaters that use condensing technology and the related venting, DOE requests information and data on potential impacts as compared to consumer water heaters that use non-condensing technology, such as, but not limited to, the complexity/cost of installation, changes to a home’s aesthetics, and the potential for fuel switching. DOE also requests comment on other instances where it may be appropriate to separate any of the existing product classes and whether it might reduce any compliance burdens. DOE further requests feedback on whether combining certain classes could impact product utility by 
eliminating any performance-related features or impact the stringency of the current energy conservation standard for these products. 
Issue C.2 DOE seeks information 
regarding any other new product classes it should consider for inclusion in its analysis. Specifically, DOE requests information on the performance-related features that provide unique consumer utility and data detailing the 
corresponding impacts on energy use that would justify separate product classes (i.e., explanation for why the 
presence of these performance-related features would increase energy consumption). 
2. Technology Assessment 
In analyzing the feasibility of 
potential new or amended energy 
conservation standards, DOE uses information about existing and past technology options and prototype designs to help identify technologies that manufacturers could use to meet and/or exceed a given set of energy conservation standards under consideration. In consultation with interested parties, DOE intends to develop a list of technologies to consider in its analysis. That analysis will initially include a number of the technology options DOE previously considered during its most recent rulemaking for consumer water heaters (i.e., the April 2010 Final Rule). 75 FR 
20112, 20136–20145 (April 16, 2010). In addition, DOE conducted preliminary market research by examining manufacturer product literature and published technical literature (e.g., reports, journal articles, or presentations) which identified specific technologies and design options, and DOE will consider these along with any others identified during the rulemaking process, should it determine that a rulemaking is necessary. The technologies DOE has identified to date, including several technology options from the previous rulemaking, are presented in Table II.2 of this RFI. DOE notes that while this list includes all technology options that DOE is aware of with the potential to reduce energy consumption, a number of the technology options would not affect the UEF (i.e., the regulatory metric) as 
measured by the DOE test procedure even though they may reduce actual energy consumption when installed. DOE has included such technologies in this list for informational purposes only, as technologies that do not affect UEF would not necessarily be implemented to comply with potential amended energy conservation standards. While some of the technology options that do not increase UEF could still benefit consumers by reducing field energy consumption and/or improving performance, technologies that do not increase UEF would not be considered 
in an engineering analysis for a rulemaking, should one be initiated. In addition, some technologies may be screened out in the screening analysis, as discussed in section II.D of this RFI. 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 May 20, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM 21MYP130859 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 99 / Thursday, May 21, 2020 / Proposed Rules 
TABLE II.2—P OTENTIAL TECHNOLOGIES FOR INCREASING EFFICIENCY  
Description Technologies 
considered in 
the April 2010 
final rule Technologies 
that do not 
affect UEF 
Heat traps ..................................................................................................................... ........................................... X 
Improved insulation: 
Increased thickness ............................................................................................................ .............................. X 
Insulation on tank bottom ...................................................................................................... ........................... X 
Less conductive tank materials (e.g., plastic) .................................................................................................. X 
Foam insulation ................................................................................................................ ................................ X 
Pipe and fitting insulation.
Advanced insulation types: 
Aerogel ...................................................................................................................................................... X 
Vacuum panels .................................................................................................................. ........................ X 
Inert gas-filled panels ........................................................................................................ ........................ X 
Electronic ignition systems: 
Direct spark ignition .......................................................................................................... ................................ X 
Intermittent pilot ignition .................................................................................................... ............................... X 
Hot surface ignition ........................................................................................................... ................................ X 
Improved burners: 
Pulse combustion ............................................................................................................... .............................. X 
Pressurized combustion.
Side-arm heating ............................................................................................................... ............................... X 
Two-phase thermosiphon technology .............................................................................................. ................ X 
Modulating burners ............................................................................................................. .............................. X 
Reduced burner size (slow recovery) ............................................................................................ .................. X 
Heat exchanger improvements: 
Increased heat exchanger surface area .......................................................................................... ................ X 
Enhanced flue baffle ........................................................................................................... .............................. X 
Submerged combustion chamber ................................................................................................... ................. X 
Multiple flues ................................................................................................................. .................................... X 
Alternative flue geometry (Helical) ............................................................................................ ....................... X 
U-Tube .............................................................................................................................................................. X 
Condensing technology .......................................................................................................... .......................... X 
Direct-fired heat exchange ..................................................................................................... .......................... X 
Improved venting: 
Flue damper:.
Powered (external supply) ...................................................................................................... .................. X 
Powered (thermopile) Buoyancy .................................................................................................. ............. X 
Direct vent .................................................................................................................... .................................... X 
Concentric direct venting ...................................................................................................... ............................ X 
Power vent ..................................................................................................................... ................................... X 
Power-direct vent .............................................................................................................. ................................ X 
Improved heat pump water heater components: 
Advanced compressors.
Centrifugal fans.
Increased heat exchanger surface area.
Improved fan motors.
Absorption heat pump water heaters.
Adsorption heat pump water heaters.
Carbon dioxide heat pump water heaters ......................................................................................... ...................... X 
Thermophotovoltaic and thermoelectric generators ............................................................................... ................. X 
Solar thermal.
Improved controls: 
Timer controls ................................................................................................................................................... X X 
Modulating controls ............................................................................................................ .............................. X 
Intelligent and wireless controls and communication ............................................................................ ........... X X 
Grid interactive capabilities.
Self-cleaning .................................................................................................................. .......................................... X X 
Issue C.3 DOE seeks information 
related to these technologies regarding 
their applicability to the current market and how these technologies may impact the efficiency of consumer water heaters as measured according to the DOE test procedure. DOE also seeks information on how these technologies may have changed since they were considered in the April 2010 Final Rule analysis. Specifically, DOE seeks information on 
the range of efficiencies or performance characteristics for products that are currently equipped with each technology option. 
Issue C.4 DOE seeks information on 
the technologies listed in Table II.2 regarding their market adoption, costs, and any concerns with incorporating them into products (e.g., impacts on consumer utility, potential safety 
concerns, manufacturing/production/ implementation issues). 
Issue C.5 DOE seeks comment on 
other technology options that it should consider for inclusion in its analysis and whether these technologies may impact product features or consumer utility. 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 May 20, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM 21MYP130860 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 99 / Thursday, May 21, 2020 / Proposed Rules 
3For example, in the previous rulemaking for 
consumer water heaters, DOE did not consider 
reduced burner size due to the associated utility impact. See Chapter 4 of the technical support 
document for the April 2010 Final Rule (Available at: https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=EERE- 
2006-STD-0129-0170). D. Screening Analysis 
The purpose of the screening analysis 
is to evaluate the technologies that 
improve equipment efficiency to determine which technologies will be eliminated from further consideration and which will be passed to the engineering analysis for further consideration. 
DOE determines whether to eliminate 
certain technology options from further consideration based on the following criteria: 
(1) Technological feasibility. 
Technologies that are not incorporated in commercial products or in working prototypes will not be considered further. 
(2) Practicability to manufacture, 
install, and service. If it is determined that mass production of a technology in commercial products and reliable installation and servicing of the technology could not be achieved on the scale necessary to serve the relevant market at the time of the compliance date of the standard, then that technology will not be considered further. 
(3) Impacts on product utility or 
product availability. If a technology is determined to have significant adverse impact on the utility of the product for significant subgroups of consumers, or result in the unavailability of any covered product category or class with performance characteristics (including reliability), features, sizes, capacities, and volumes that are substantially the same as equipment generally available in the United States at the time, it will not be considered further.
3 
(4) Adverse impacts on health or 
safety. If it is determined that a technology will have significant adverse impacts on health or safety, it will not be considered further. 
10 CFR part 430, subpart C, appendix 
A, sections 4(a)(4) and 5(b). 
Technology options identified in the 
technology assessment are evaluated against these criteria using DOE analyses and inputs from interested parties (e.g., manufacturers, trade 
organizations, and energy efficiency advocates). Technologies that pass through the screening analysis are referred to as ‘‘design options’’ in the engineering analysis. Technology options that fail to meet one or more of the four criteria are eliminated from consideration. 
Table II.3 summarizes the technology 
options that DOE screened out in the April 2010 Final Rule, as well as the applicable screening criteria. 
TABLE II.3—P REVIOUSLY SCREENED OUTTECHNOLOGY OPTIONS FROM THE APRIL 2010 F INAL RULE 
Screened technology option EPCA criteria 
(X = basis for screening out) 
Technological 
Feasibility Practicability 
to manufacture, 
install, and 
service Adverse impact 
on product utility Adverse impacts 
on health and 
safety 
Side-Arm Heater ...................................................................... X X 
Flue Damper (Buoyancy Operated) ........................................ X 
Directly Fired ............................................................................ X 
Condensing Pulse Combustion ............................................... X X 
Advanced Insulation Types ..................................................... X X 
Thermophotovoltaic and Thermoelectric Generators .............. X X 
U-Tube Flue ............................................................................. X 
Reduced Burner Size .............................................................. X 
Two-Phase Thermosiphon ....................................................... X 
Carbon Dioxide (‘‘CO 2’’) Heat Pump Water Heater ................ X 
Issue D.1 DOE requests feedback on 
what impact, if any, the four screening 
criteria described in this section would have on consideration of each of the technology options listed with respect to consumer water heaters. Similarly, 
DOE seeks information regarding how these same criteria would affect consideration of any other technology options not already identified in this document with respect to their potential use in consumer water heaters. 
Issue D.2 With respect to the 
screened out technology options listed in Table II.3, DOE seeks information on whether these options would, based on current and projected assessments regarding each of them, remain screened out under the four screening criteria described in section II.D of this RFI. With respect to each of these technology options, what steps, if any, could be (or have already been) taken to facilitate the introduction of each option as a means to improve the energy performance of consumer water heaters and the potential to impact consumer utility of the consumer water heaters. 
Finally, DOE notes that the four 
screening criteria do not directly address the propriety status of design options. DOE only considers potential efficiency levels achieved through the use of proprietary designs in the engineering analysis if they are not part of a unique pathway to achieve that efficiency level (i.e., if there are other 
non-proprietary technologies capable of achieving the same efficiency level). 
E. Engineering Analysis 
The engineering analysis estimates 
the cost-efficiency relationship of 
products at different levels of increased energy efficiency (‘‘efficiency levels’’). 
This relationship serves as the basis for the cost-benefit calculations for consumers, manufacturers, and the Nation. In determining the cost- efficiency relationship, DOE estimates 
the increase in manufacturer production cost (‘‘MPC’’) associated with increasing the efficiency of products above the baseline, up to the maximum technologically feasible (‘‘max-tech’’) efficiency level for each product class. 
DOE historically has used the 
following three methodologies to generate incremental manufacturing costs and establish efficiency levels (‘‘ELs’’) for analysis: (1) The design- option approach, which provides the incremental costs of adding to a baseline model design options that will improve its efficiency; (2) the efficiency-level approach, which provides the relative 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 May 20, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM 21MYP130861 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 99 / Thursday, May 21, 2020 / Proposed Rules 
costs of achieving increases in energy 
efficiency levels, without regard to the particular design options used to achieve such increases; and (3) the cost- assessment (or reverse engineering) approach, which provides ‘‘bottom-up’’ manufacturing cost assessments for achieving various levels of increased efficiency, based on detailed data as to costs for parts and materials, labor, shipping/packaging, and investment for models that operate at particular efficiency levels. 
1. Representative Product 
Characteristics 
DOE intends to perform a teardown 
analysis on a set of models with 
‘‘representative’’ characteristics to estimate the cost-efficiency relationship for consumer water heaters. For consumer storage-type water heaters, the tank volume significantly affects the 
energy consumed. That is, it takes more energy to heat a larger volume of water from a given temperature to a higher temperature. Additionally, the tank surface area increases as tank volume increases and, among other factors, the heat transfer rate is a function of surface area. Therefore, increased surface area increases the rate of heat transfer to the ambient air, which increases standby losses. This is reflected in the existing Federal energy conservation standards, as UEF is a function of the tank storage volume for storage water heaters. 
DOE plans to conduct teardowns at 
specific storage volumes (referred to as 
representative storage volumes) that are the most common on the market, and extrapolate those results for the entire market. Based on information from the previous consumer water heater 
rulemaking and a survey of models currently on the market, DOE has preliminarily determined the characteristics of representative units for each product class. In particular, DOE examined the number of models 
available at distinct rated storage volumes and intends to use the most common storage volume as a representative characteristic in each product class. Storage volume typically does not vary for gas-fired and electric instantaneous water heaters, so DOE conducted a similar review of the available input rates of these instantaneous water heaters. Table II.4 presents the preliminary representative storage volumes and input rates for existing product classes of consumer water heaters. 
TABLE II.4—P RELIMINARY REPRESENTATIVE VALUES BY PRODUCT CLASS FOR CONSUMER WATER HEATERS WITHUEF 
STANDARDS  
Product class Distinguishing 
characteristics 
(rated storage volume and input 
rating *) Currently planned 
representative value(s) ** Other potential 
representative values 
under consideration 
Gas-fired Storage Water Heater .... ≥20 gal and ≤55 gal ..................... 38 gal, Medium Draw Pattern ...... 48 gal, High Draw Pattern. 
>55 gal and ≤100 gal ................... 80 gal,† High Draw Pattern .......... 67 gal, High Draw Pattern. 
Oil-fired Storage Water Heater ...... ≤50 gal .......................................... 30 gal, High Draw Pattern ............ 48 gal, High Draw Pattern. 
Electric Storage Water Heater ....... ≥20 gal and ≤55 gal ..................... 46 gal, Medium Draw Pattern ...... 27 gal, Low Draw Pattern or 36 
gal, Medium Draw Pattern. 
>55 gal and ≤120 gal ................... 80 gal, High Draw Pattern ............ 67 gal, High Draw Pattern. 
Tabletop Water Heater .................. ≥20 gal and ≤120 gal ................... 36 gal, Low Draw Pattern ............. 35 gal, Medium Draw Pattern. 
Gas-fired Instantaneous Water 
Heater.<2 gal and >50,000 Btu/h ............. 0 gal and 199,000 Btu/h, High 
Draw Pattern.0 gal and 180,000 Btu/h, High 
Draw Pattern. 
Electric Instantaneous Water Heat-
er.<2 gal ............................................ 0 gal and 3.5 kW,‡ Very Small 
Draw Pattern.None. 
Grid-Enabled Water Heater ........... >75 gal .......................................... 80 gal, High Draw Pattern ............ 100 gal, High Draw Pattern. 
* Input rating is only used as a distinguishing characteristic for consumer gas-fired instantaneous water heaters. Models with input rates greater 
than 50,000 Btu/h currently have UEF standards. 
** Storage volumes listed are the rated storage volume as determined under 10 CFR 429.17. 
† DOE did not identify any consumer gas-fired storage water heater models with rated storage volume >55 gal and ≤100 gal on the market. 
‡The spread of input rates is evenly distributed across range of available inputs (i.e., 0 kW to 12 kW). 
Issue E.1 DOE requests feedback on 
the appropriate representative storage 
volumes and input capacities for each product class of consumer water heaters. DOE also requests feedback on whether there are additional representative characteristics that 
should be considered. 
The energy conservation standards 
prescribed by EPCA apply more broadly than those listed in 10 CFR 430.32(d) and do not exclude water heaters based on storage volume or minimum input rate (in the case of consumer gas-fired instantaneous water heaters). (42 U.S.C. 
6295(e)(1)) Furthermore, DOE’s previous EF test procedure did not cover water heaters listed in Table II.5; however, DOE’s updated UEF test procedure does cover these products. Because these products now have an applicable test procedure and are covered products, DOE is considering them in its analysis. Table II.5 presents these classes and their tentative representative characteristics. For many of these product classes, DOE has been unable to identify any models on the market, and, therefore, no representative values are provided in the table. For these classes, DOE has tentatively concluded that a lack of models indicates there are also no shipments. Thus, there is no potential for energy savings from amended standards for these classes at this time. If DOE ultimately confirms this to be true, DOE plans to merely convert the existing standards from EF to equivalent UEF standards for these product classes. 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 May 20, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM 21MYP130862 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 99 / Thursday, May 21, 2020 / Proposed Rules 
4For certain categories of consumer water 
heaters, these translations were not done during the 
December 2016 conversion factor rulemaking. DOE concluded that to start enforcing standards immediately would have been quite burdensome to industry. Further, DOE received a number of comments regarding the technical merits of the proposed conversions for these products and decided to defer finalizing and implementing UEF standards to allow for further consideration of those comments. 81 FR 96204, 96211 (Dec. 29, 2016). TABLE II.5—P RELIMINARY REPRESENTATIVE VALUES FOR PRODUCTS CURRENTLY WITHOUT UEF S TANDARDS  
Product class Distinguishing 
characteristics 
(rated storage volume and input 
rating*) Currently planned 
representative value(s) Other potential 
representative values 
under consideration 
Gas-fired Storage Water Heater .... <20 gal ** 
>100 gal ** 
Oil-fired Storage Water Heater ...... >50 gal ** 
Electric Storage Water Heater ....... <20 gal .......................................... 19 gal ............................................ 6 gal, 12 gal, or 19.9 gal. 
> 120 gal ** 
Tabletop Water Heater .................. <20 gal ** 
> 120 gal ** 
Gas-fired Instantaneous Water 
Heater.≥2 gal or ≤ 50,000 Btu/h ** ........... 20 gal ............................................ 4 gal. 
Oil-fired Instantaneous Water 
Heater.All .................................................. 5.1 gal 
Electric Instantaneous Water Heat-
er.≥2 gal ** 
* Input rating is only used as a distinguishing characteristic for consumer gas-fired instantaneous water heaters. Models with input rates greater 
than 50,000 Btu/h currently have UEF standards. 
** DOE was unable to find models on the market in this product class. 
Issue E.2 DOE requests feedback on 
the appropriate representative storage 
volumes and specifically whether those identified in Table II.5 are reasonable. DOE also seeks feedback on whether products exist in the classes for which DOE was unable to find models on the market, and, if so, relevant information about those products and appropriate representative characteristics. 
2. Efficiency Levels 
a. Baseline Efficiency Levels 
For each established product class, 
DOE selects a baseline efficiency as a 
reference point against which any changes resulting from energy conservation standards can be measured. For products with an existing energy conservation standard, the baseline efficiency level is typically the current minimum energy conservation standard. For products that do not have an existing minimum energy conservation standard, DOE considers the least-efficient product on the market as a baseline product. DOE will establish the baseline efficiency level for each product class in terms of UEF. For products where UEF standards are established, DOE will use those standards as the baseline level; for covered consumer water heaters where the standard has not yet been converted to UEF (i.e., water heaters stated as 
being covered by EF standards from EPCA in Table II.1 of this RFI), DOE will undertake an analysis to translate the EF standard to an equivalent UEF standard, which will serve as the baseline level.
4 The baseline model in each product class represents the characteristics of common or typical products in that class. Typically, a baseline model is one that just meets the current minimum energy conservation standards and provides basic consumer utility. 
DOE uses baseline units for 
comparison in several phases of the analyses, including the engineering analysis, life-cycle cost (‘‘LCC’’) analysis, payback period (‘‘PBP’’) analysis, and national impact analysis (‘‘NIA’’). In the engineering analysis, to determine the changes in price to the consumer that result from amended energy conservation standards, DOE compares the price of a baseline unit to the price of a unit at each higher efficiency level. 
Consistent with this analytical 
approach, DOE tentatively plans to consider the current minimum energy conservation standards to establish the baseline efficiency levels for each product class. The current standards that rely on UEF are found at 10 CFR 430.32(d). For consumer water heaters not identified at 10 CFR 430.32(d), the standards rely on EF and are set forth at 42 U.S.C. 6295(e)(1). For storage water heaters, the baseline level varies based on the storage volume, and DOE would focus on the baseline efficiency standard for models at the representative storage volume. For the product classes without UEF-based standards (i.e., products listed in Table 
II.5 of this RFI), DOE would translate the EF-based standards to UEF to 
determine the baseline level. 
DOE has preliminarily identified a 
technology pathway for each product class. The preliminary baseline technology options that DOE has identified as being representative for each product class are discussed in section II.E.3 of this RFI. 
Issue E.3 For the products listed in 
Table II.5 for this RFI as being covered by EPCA standards but not the included in the December 2016 Conversion Factor 
Final Rule that converted standards to UEF, DOE requests EF and UEF test data and/or other relevant information that could assist in the development of UEF- based standard levels to serve as the baseline levels. 
Issue E.4 DOE requests feedback on 
the preliminary baseline technology options for each product class. (Note, DOE discusses its preliminary understanding of the technology options used in baseline products in section III.E.3 of this RFI) DOE requests feedback on whether there are any important features of baseline models (other than energy efficiency, storage volume, and input capacity) that should be accounted for in its analysis. 
b. Intermediate Energy Efficiency Levels 
DOE conducted a survey of the 
consumer water heater market to 
determine the designs and efficiencies of products that are currently available to consumers. For each representative product, DOE surveyed various manufacturers’ product offerings to identify the efficiency levels that correspond to the highest number of models and the prevailing technologies used to reach those efficiency levels. By identifying the most prevalent energy efficiencies in the range of available 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 May 20, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM 21MYP130863 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 99 / Thursday, May 21, 2020 / Proposed Rules 
5AHRI, Directory of Certified Product 
Performance for Residential Water Heaters. 
(Available at: https://www.ahridirectory.org/ NewSearch?programId=24&searchTypeId=3) (Last 
accessed: Dec. 2, 2019). 
6DOE, Compliance Certification Database 
(Available at: https://www.regulations.doe.gov/ certification-data/CCMS-4-Water_ Heaters.html#
q=Product_ Group_ s%3A%22Water%20Heaters
%22) (Last accessed: Dec. 2, 2019). products and examining the designs 
used at those efficiencies, DOE has preliminarily identified a technology path that manufacturers typically use to increase the energy efficiency of consumer water heating products (see section III.E.3 of this RFI). 
DOE analyzes intermediate energy 
efficiency levels between the baseline and max-tech levels for each product class. The intermediate efficiency levels are generally representative of the most commonly available efficiency levels available on the market, and follow 
technology paths that manufacturers of consumer water heaters commonly use to maintain cost-effective designs while increasing energy efficiency. DOE conducted a preliminary review of manufacturer literature, the Air- Conditioning Heating and Refrigeration Institute (‘‘AHRI’’) directory of certified 
product performance,
5and DOE’s 
compliance certification database to compile efficiency information for a wide range of water heaters available on the market.
6DOE also reviewed 
manufacturer literature to assess, to the extent possible, the technologies in use in consumer water heaters. DOE notes that different manufacturers may use different technology pathways to achieve the same efficiency level, and, if it determines that a rulemaking is 
necessary, the Department would expect to attempt to capture this in the analysis. Section II.E.3 presents the product classes and the respective technology pathways that DOE anticipates analyzing. 
Issue E.5 DOE seeks comment on 
whether there are any key intermediate efficiency levels (in terms of UEF 
values) that should be considered in the analysis. DOE also seeks comment on 
common technology pathways to reach higher efficiency levels (i.e., the order in 
which manufacturers implement energy-saving technologies). (Note, DOE discusses its preliminary understanding of the technology options used in consumer water heaters in section III.E.3 of this RFI.) 
c. Maximum Technologically Feasible 
Efficiency Levels 
The maximum available efficiency 
level is the efficiency level of the 
highest-efficiency unit currently available on the market. The current maximum available efficiencies are included in Table II.6 of this RFI. 
TABLE II.6—M AXIMUM EFFICIENCY LEVELS CURRENTLY AVAILABLE AT REPRESENTATIVE VALUES  
Product class Distinguishing 
characteristics (rated 
storage volume 
and input rating *) Currently planned 
representative 
value(s) ** Maximum UEF 
currently 
available 
Gas-fired Storage Water Heater ............. ≥20 gal and ≤55 gal ................................ 38 gal, Medium Draw Pattern ................. 0.68 
>55 gal and ≤100 gal .............................. 80 gal, High Draw Pattern ....................... †N/A 
Oil-fired Storage Water Heater ................ ≤50 gal ..................................................... 30 gal, High Draw Pattern ....................... 0.68 
Electric Storage Water Heater ................ ≥20 gal and ≤ 55 gal ............................... 46 gal, Medium Draw Pattern ................. 3.55 
>55 gal and ≤120 gal .............................. 80 gal, High Draw Pattern ....................... 3.70 
Tabletop Water Heater ............................ ≥20 gal and ≤120 gal .............................. 36 gal, Low Draw Pattern ....................... 0.81 
Gas-fired Instantaneous Water Heater ... <2 gal and >50,000 Btu/h ....................... 0 gal and 199,000 Btu/h, High Draw Pat-
tern.0.97 
Oil-fired Instantaneous Water Heater ...... All ............................................................. 5.1 gal .............. ........................................ ††N/A 
Electric Instantaneous Water Heater ...... <2 gal ....................................................... 0 gal and 3.5 kW, †††Very Small Draw 
Pattern.0.98 
Grid-Enabled Water Heater ..................... >75 gal ..................................................... 100 gal, High Draw Pa ttern ..................... 0.93 
* Input rating is only used as a distinguishing characteristic for consumer gas-fired instantaneous water heaters. Models with input rates greater 
than 50,000 Btu/h currently have UEF standards. 
** Storage volumes listed are the rated storage volume as determined under 10 CFR 429.17. 
† DOE did not identify any consumer gas-fired storage water heater models with rated storage volume >55 gal and ≤100 gal on the market. 
†† There are currently no oil-fired instantaneous water heaters certified in the DOE compliance certification database. ††† The spread of input rates is evenly distributed across range of available inputs ( i.e., 0 kW to 12 kW). 
DOE also determines the maximum 
technologically feasible (max-tech) 
improvement in energy efficiency for consumer water heaters. DOE defines a max-tech efficiency level to represent the theoretical maximum possible efficiency if all available design options are incorporated in a model. In many cases, the max-tech efficiency level is not commercially available because it is not economically feasible. Based on DOE’s initial review of the consumer water heater market (as discussed in the 
previous section), DOE has preliminarily identified technology options commonly used to increase efficiency, including those associated with the max-tech efficiency level for each product class. DOE intends to analyze the available efficiency data to determine the UEF values that correspond to the technology options currently used to reach max-tech levels to determine the appropriate max-tech UEF values. DOE describes the technologies currently used to reach the max-tech efficiency levels in section II.E.3 of this RFI. 
Issue E.6 DOE seeks input on 
whether the maximum available efficiency levels are appropriate for potential consideration as possible energy conservation standards for the products at issue—and if not, why not. 
Issue E.7 DOE seeks feedback on 
what design options would be incorporated at a max-tech efficiency level, and the efficiencies associated with those levels. As part of this request, DOE also seeks information as to whether there are limitations on the use of certain combinations of design options. (Note, DOE discusses its preliminary understanding of the technology options in max-tech products in section III.E.3 of this RFI.) 
3. Technology Pathway 
DOE plans to consider and analyze 
various technologies for improving the 
energy efficiency of consumer water heaters. To accurately represent the current market in its analyses, DOE uses information from publicly-available 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 May 20, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM 21MYP130864 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 99 / Thursday, May 21, 2020 / Proposed Rules 
product literature to determine which 
technologies are used in commercially- available products. DOE also identifies which technologies manufacturers would be most likely to include in products to meet potential amended energy conservation standards based on current designs observed on the market. DOE’s preliminary understanding of the most prevalent technologies to obtain the intermediate and max-tech energy efficiency levels for each product class are described immediately below. DOE may revise the technology pathway for each category of consumer water heater in the preliminary analysis based on stakeholder comments and observations made during teardowns. 
a. Gas-Fired Storage Water Heaters 
As stated previously, DOE conducted 
a review of the currently-available 
consumer gas-fired storage water heaters on the market. DOE has observed that the baseline design typically consists of a standing pilot, atmospheric venting, and 2 inches of foam insulation. DOE found that models in the representative volume and draw pattern (40 gallons and medium draw pattern) use similar technology options to those found in the baseline (0.58 UEF) up to 0.61 UEF and can achieve higher efficiencies by increasing insulation thickness or increasing the heat exchange via improvements to the flue and/or baffling. To obtain efficiencies above 0.61 UEF, manufacturers can make use of the aforementioned options, and also typically remove the standing pilot ignition system in favor of an electronic ignition system and add a flue damper or power venting system, or some combination of these options. The highest efficiency products currently on the market utilize condensing technology. However, gas-fired heat pump water heater designs are currently under development and would likely result in higher efficiencies than those achieved by condensing gas-fired water heaters currently available on the market. In the event of any rulemaking resulting from this RFI, DOE would assess gas-fired heat pump water heater technology using the screening criteria 
discussed in section II.D to determine whether it is appropriate for consideration in the analysis. 
Issue E.8 DOE requests feedback on 
the specific technologies used to increase efficiency of atmospherically- vented, standing pilot models that have efficiencies between the baseline (0.58 UEF) and 0.61 UEF. Specifically, how much insulation and/or baffling/heat exchange area is used at each level, and are there other design changes that increase the efficiency? Furthermore, in any rulemaking 
resulting from this RFI, DOE tentatively 
intends to consider separately analyzing models that use standard and low- nitrogen oxide (‘‘NO
X’’) burners from 
those that use ultra-low-NO Xburners, as 
was done in the April 2010 Final Rule. However, due to the similarity between these categories of gas-fired storage water heaters, for this RFI, DOE did not identify a separate technology pathway for consumer gas-fired water heaters that use standard and low-NO
Xburners 
from those that use ultra-low-NO X 
burners. 
Issue E.9 DOE requests feedback on 
the typical technology pathway for increasing the energy efficiency of consumer gas-fired storage water heaters. DOE is also interested in differences in the design pathway between water heaters with standard and low-NO
Xburners and those with 
ultra-low-NO Xburners. This includes 
information on the order in which manufacturers would incorporate the different technologies to incrementally improve the efficiencies of products. DOE also requests feedback on whether the increased energy efficiency would lead to other design changes that would not occur otherwise. DOE is also interested in information regarding any potential impact of design options on a manufacturer’s ability to incorporate additional functions or attributes in response to consumer demand. 
Issue E.10 DOE requests feedback on 
whether gas-fired heat pump water 
heaters should be considered as the max-tech design for consumer gas-fired water heaters. 
Issue E.11 DOE requests feedback on 
the thickness of insulation in products currently available on the market and what would be technologically feasible as the maximum insulation thickness. DOE has particular interest in understanding the insulation thickness beyond which an increase in thickness would not produce a noticeable effect on energy efficiency. 
b. Electric Storage Water Heaters 
For consumer electric storage water 
heaters with a rated storage volume of 
50 gallons, the baseline efficiency level is achieved with electric resistance heating elements. To obtain slightly higher efficiencies, increased insulation or optimized geometry could be employed for water heaters using only electric resistance heating elements. For larger increases in efficiency, heat pump technology is used. From a review of manufacturer literature, DOE was unable to assess specific differences between the less-efficient and more- efficient heat pump water heater designs, up to the max-tech efficiency 
level. The magnitude of the increase between these levels suggests that improvements to the various heat pump components are responsible for these efficiency level increases. DOE intends to explore these efficiency and design differences further during its testing and teardown analysis. 
Issue E.12 DOE requests feedback on 
the technology pathway for electric storage water heaters. This includes information on the order in which manufacturers would incorporate the different technologies to incrementally improve the efficiencies of products. DOE also requests feedback on whether the increased energy efficiency would lead to other design changes that would not occur otherwise. DOE is also interested in information regarding any potential impact of design options on a 
manufacturer’s ability to incorporate additional functions or attributes in response to consumer demand. 
Issue E.13 DOE requests feedback on 
heat pump components used in heat pump water heaters of varying efficiency, up to the max-tech level. 
Issue E.14 DOE requests feedback on 
the insulation thickness and materials used in electric storage water heaters (both electric resistance and heat pump water heaters). 
Issue E.15 DOE requests feedback on 
the maximum efficiency potential of CO
2heat pump water heaters. 
c. Oil-Fired Storage Water Heaters 
DOE examined the representative 
storage volume of 30 gallons for consumer oil-fired storage water heaters. Very few models currently exist on the market compared to the other product classes. DOE found oil-fired storage water heaters at the representative storage volume with rated UEF values up to 0.68. Consumer oil-fired storage water heaters typically incorporate electronic ignition and power venting; therefore, efficiency improvement technologies are likely to include increasing the surface area within the flue, and to a lesser extent increasing the insulation thickness or upgrading the insulation material. Improvements to the flue include increased baffling, multiple flues, and/or multi-pass flues. 
Issue E.16 DOE requests feedback on 
the technology pathway for consumer oil-fired water heaters and in particular the insulation material and thickness currently being used. This includes information on the order in which manufacturers would incorporate the different technologies to incrementally improve the efficiencies of products. DOE also requests feedback on whether the increased energy efficiency would 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 May 20, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM 21MYP130865 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 99 / Thursday, May 21, 2020 / Proposed Rules 
7Available at: https://www.regulations.gov/ 
document?D=EERE-2006-STD-0129-0149. lead to other design changes that would 
not occur otherwise. DOE is also interested in information regarding any potential impact of design options on a manufacturer’s ability to incorporate additional functions or attributes in response to consumer demand. 
d. Tabletop Water Heaters 
DOE has found that all tabletop water 
heaters currently on the market have a 
rated storage volume of either 38 or 40 gallons and a rated UEF of 0.81 and 0.90 in the low and high draw patterns, respectively. Tabletop water heaters use electric resistance elements to heat water and are contained in a rectangular box enclosure designed to slide into a kitchen countertop space with typical dimensions of 36 inches high, 25 inches deep, and 24 inches wide. 66 FR 4474, 4497 (Jan. 17, 2001). Efficiency improvements, if possible, would most likely be accomplished though upgrading the insulation material and/ or increasing the insulation thickness. 
Issue E.17 DOE requests feedback on 
what materials and methods are currently being used to insulate tabletop 
water heaters, and whether there are any technologies that can be used to improve the energy efficiency of these products. DOE also requests information on potential impacts any such technologies would have on the capacity or other performance-related features of tabletop water heaters. 
e. Gas-Fired Instantaneous Water 
Heaters 
Currently, all consumer gas-fired 
instantaneous water heaters, including those at the baseline, appear to use electronic ignition along with power venting. Based on an examination of literature for products currently available in the market, the primary method for increasing the energy efficiency of consumer gas-fired instantaneous water heaters is typically through increasing the heat exchanger surface area. As the heat exchanger surface area increases, heat transfer is improved, resulting in an increase in the efficiency of the unit. In addition, the heat transfer between flue gases and the water can be improved to the point where the flue gases are cooled below the dew point, resulting in condensation within the heat exchanger. Therefore, at higher efficiency levels, manufacturers design heat exchangers for condensing operation that are capable of managing the condensate, which include materials that can withstand corrosive condensate and methods for condensate disposal. 
Issue E.18 DOE requests feedback on 
its assessment of the technologies used at the baseline for consumer gas-fired instantaneous water heaters, as well as the technologies used to improve efficiency. 
f. Electric Instantaneous Water Heaters 
Consumer electric instantaneous 
water heaters use electric resistance 
heating along with low flow rates to provide hot water, typically for applications with lower demand, such as handwashing. Most electric instantaneous water heaters that DOE identified currently on the market have rated UEF values close to 1. This is likely the result of minimal losses from the electric resistance heating elements, combined with a lack of standby losses due to the low or negligible amount of stored water. Consequently, DOE has not identified any technology options that are currently being used or could be used to improve the energy efficiency of electric instantaneous water heaters. 
Issue E.19 DOE requests feedback on 
the technology options available for improving the energy efficiency of consumer electric instantaneous water heaters, if any. 
g. Oil-Fired Instantaneous Water Heaters 
DOE has found that consumer oil- 
fired instantaneous water heaters exist 
on the market. These water heaters use electronic ignition, are direct vented, and force air through the unit. Currently, EF and UEF values are not available for these water heaters, but the manufacturer literature advertises the ‘‘efficiency’’ as being up to 88 percent for these models. 
Issue E.20 DOE requests feedback on 
the availability of consumer oil-fired instantaneous water heaters and the technology options available to improve UEF. 
h. Grid-Enabled Water Heaters 
As a preliminary step for this RFI, 
DOE reviewed the current market for 
grid-enabled water heaters. Based on a review of product literature for grid- enabled designs, DOE has found that these water heaters use electric resistance heating elements and typically have between two to three inches of foam insulation. Plastic, stainless steel, and stone-lined steel storage tanks are currently available on the market, and these models do not use an anode rod. Glass-lined steel tanks are also available, and these models do use an anode rod. At the 96-gallon representative storage volume, all UEF ratings are at or just above the minimum efficiency standard. 
Issue E.21 DOE requests feedback on 
the technology options available for improving the energy efficiency of grid- enabled water heaters. 4. Manufacturer Production Costs and 
Manufacturer Selling Prices 
As described at the beginning of this 
section, the main outputs of the engineering analysis are cost-efficiency relationships that describe the estimated increases in manufacturer production cost associated with higher-efficiency products for the analyzed product classes. For the April 2010 Final Rule, DOE developed the cost-efficiency relationships by first identifying specific efficiency levels and the technologies incorporated at those levels. DOE then performed reverse-engineering analysis to estimate the typical cost at each efficiency level from the baseline to the max-tech. 75 FR 20112, 20141 (April 16, 2010). For this analysis, DOE plans to use a similar approach to that used in the April 2010 Final Rule, by identifying efficiency levels and performing reverse-engineering on models from various manufacturers to identify the technology(ies) implemented at each efficiency level and the cost to achieve that level. DOE plans to use the data gathered in the reverse-engineering analysis to develop the manufacturing cost-efficiency relationship. 
Issue E.22 DOE seeks input on the 
increase in MPC associated with incorporating each particular design option. Specifically, DOE is interested in whether and how the costs estimated for design options in the April 2010 Final Rule have changed since the time of that analysis. DOE also requests information on the investments necessary to incorporate specific design options, including, but not limited to, costs related to new or modified tooling (if any), materials, engineering and development efforts to implement each design option, and manufacturing/ production impacts. 
To account for manufacturers’ non- 
production costs and profit margin, DOE applies a non-production cost multiplier (the manufacturer markup) to the MPC. The resulting manufacturer selling price (‘‘MSP’’) is the price at which the manufacturer distributes a unit into commerce. For the April 2010 Final Rule, DOE estimated the manufacturer markups as 1.31 for gas-fired storage water heaters, 1.28 for electric storage water heaters, 1.30 for oil-fired storage water heaters, and 1.45 for gas-fired instantaneous water heaters. See chapter 5 of the April 2010 Final Rule technical support document (‘‘TSD’’).
7 
Issue E.23 DOE requests feedback on 
whether the manufacturer markups of 1.31, 1.28, 1.30, and 1.45 are still 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 May 20, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM 21MYP130866 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 99 / Thursday, May 21, 2020 / Proposed Rules 
8New owners are defined as existing buildings 
that acquire a consumer water heater for the first 
time or get a new category of consumer water heater during the analysis period. 9Clear Seas Research, 2019 Mechanical 
Systems—Water Heater CLEAReport (Dec. 2019) 
(Available at: https://clearseasresearch.com/product/2019-mechanical-systems-water-heater/) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019); A.O. Smith, Autumn 2019 Analyst Presentation (November 2019) (Available at: http://investor.aosmith.com/events- and-presentations) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019); Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance (‘‘NEEA’’), Water Heater Market Characterization Report (April 2018) (Available at: https://neea.org/img/documents/water-heater-market-characterization-report.pdf) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019); Consortium for Energy Efficiency (‘‘CEE’’), Residential Water Heating Initiative (March 2018) (Available at: https://library.cee1.org/system/files/library/13557/CEE_ ResWaterHeating_ Initiative_ 16Mar2018.pdf) 
(Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019); Energy Trust of 
Oregon, Existing Homes Gas Water Heater Market Research Report (Jan 2016) (Available at: https://energytrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Gas_Water_ Heater_ Market_ Research_ Report_ Public_
FINAL_ wSR.pdf) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019); 
California Energy Commission (‘‘CEC’’), Residential Water Heating Program, Facilitating the Market Transformation to Higher Efficiency Gas-Fired Water Heating (December 2012) (Available at: http://www.energy.ca.gov/2013publications/CEC- 500-2013-060/CEC-500-2013-060.pdf) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019); NEEA, 2011 Water Heater Market Update (Jan. 2012) (Available at: https://neea.org/img/uploads/2011WaterHeaterMarketUpdateA273DBB87CA3.pdf ) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 
2019); ENERGY STAR, Water Heater Market Profile: Efficiency Sells (Sept. 2010) (Available at: https:// 
www.energystar.gov/ia/partners/prod _
development/new_ specs/downloads/water_ heaters/
Water_ Heater_ Market_ Profile_ 2010.pdf) (Last 
accessed Dec. 2, 2019); ENERGY STAR, Water Heater Market Profile: New Technology, New Savings (Sept. 2009) (Available at: https://www.energystar.gov/ia/partners/prod _
development/new_ specs/downloads/water_ heaters/
Water_ Heater_ Market_ Profile_ Sept2009.pdf) (Last 
accessed Dec. 2, 2019); CEE, High-Efficiency Residential Gas Water Heating Initiative (March 2008); A.O. Smith, Water Heater Marketplace (2008) (Available at: https://www.energystar.gov/sites/default/files/asset/document/AOSmith _General_
Session.pdf) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019); NEEA, Residential Water Heater Market (July 2006) (Available at: https://neea.org/img/uploads/AssessmentoftheResidentialWaterHeaterMarketingNWC6F59C4D2EEB.pdf) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019); Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (‘‘LBNL’’), The LBNL Water Heater Retail Price Database (Oct. 2000) (Available at: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/775102 ) (Last accessed 
Dec. 2, 2019). 
10Online sales includes sales through home 
improvement and hardware store websites (such as Home Depot, Lowe’s, Ace Hardware, and Menards), as well as online-only websites (such as amazon.com). DOE does not have enough information at this point to compute a separate markup estimate the online sales distribution channel. DOE intends to assume that the retailer mark-up is similar to the online sales mark-up. 11In some cases, the retail outlet provides 
installation as part of a package. In others, the retail outlet links the customer to a contractor for installation. Self-installation is likely more common for electric than for gas water heaters due to the greater complexity of replacing a gas unit. This is consistent with data from ENERGY STAR’s 2010 Water Heater Market Profile study that show that consumers are more likely to install electric storage water heaters themselves compared to other categories of consumer water heaters. 
12This represents consumer water heaters that are 
purchased by commercial consumers for use in a commercial applications. Unlike commercial consumers, residential consumers typically are unable to purchase directly from a wholesaler. 
13This represents consumer water heaters that are 
purchased by commercial consumers for use in a commercial applications. Unlike commercial consumers, residential consumers typically are unable to purchase from manufacturers through a national account. appropriate for gas-fired storage water 
heaters, electric storage water heaters, oil-fired storage water heaters, and gas- fired instantaneous water heaters, respectively. 
In addition, for products where 
changes to the energy conservation standard are likely to cause a large difference in the size of the product, DOE sometimes considers shipping costs incurred by manufacturers to ship the product to their first customer separately from the manufacturer markup. In such cases, manufacturer selling price is calculated as the manufacturer production cost multiplied by the manufacturer markup, and shipping price is added (as shipping cost is not typically marked up). DOE plans to investigate this approach for consumer water heaters to determine how dimensions may change with increasing efficiency and whether such changes would increase the shipping costs for manufacturers. 
Issue E.24 DOE requests comment 
on how the cost to ship a consumer water heater changes with efficiency. 
F. Markups Analysis 
The markups analysis develops 
appropriate markups (e.g., for 
wholesalers, contractors, general 
contractors, mobile home manufacturers, and mobile home dealers) in the distribution chain and sales taxes to convert the MSP derived in the engineering analysis to consumer prices, which are then used in the LCC and PBP analyses and other analyses. At each step in the distribution channel, companies mark up the price of the product to cover business costs and profit margin. 
1. Distribution Channels 
In generating end-user price inputs for 
the LCC analysis and NIA, DOE must 
identify distribution channels (i.e., how 
the products are moved from the manufacturer to the consumer), and estimate relative sales volumes through each channel. 
Markups depends on the distribution 
channels for a product (i.e., how the 
product passes through the chain of commerce from the manufacturer to the customer). Two different markets exist for consumer water heating systems: (1) Replacements and new owners
8and (2) 
new construction. Based on several references, DOE plans to determine the main distribution channels for each water heater product class and the fraction of shipments through each 
channel.
9 
a. Replacement and New Owner 
For replacement and new owner 
applications, manufacturers sell mainly to either plumbing distributors or retailers (including retailers that sell online
10). The four main distribution 
paths that DOE intends to consider are: (1) A plumbing distributor sells a water heater to a contractor, who then sells it to a consumer and installs it, (2) a retailer sells a water heater to a contractor, who then sells it to a consumer and installs it, (3) a retailer sells a water heater to the consumer, who hires a contractor to install it, or (4) a retailer sells a water heater to the consumer, who self-installs it.
11In 
addition, DOE plans to consider distribution channels where the manufacturer sells the consumer water heater directly to a commercial consumer through a national account or the commercial consumer purchases the consumer water heater directly through a wholesaler. These channels reflect those cases where the installation can be accomplished by site personnel. 
In summary, DOE plans to 
characterize the replacement and new owner market distribution channels for consumer water heating systems as 
follows: 
Manufacturer → Wholesaler → 
Contractor → Consumer 
Manufacturer → Retail Store → 
Contractor → Consumer 
Manufacturer → Retail Store → 
Consumer [Contractor-Installed] 
Manufacturer → Retail Store → 
Consumer [Self-Installed] 
Manufacturer → Wholesaler → 
Commercial Consumer
12 
Manufacturer → National Account → 
Commercial Consumer13 
b. New Construction 
The new construction distribution 
channel for consumer water heaters 
includes an additional link in the chain—the general contractor. In most new construction applications, the consumer water heater is part of the overall plumbing package installed by a plumbing contractor or, in the case of large building companies, by its own master plumber and crew. A plumbing contractor usually purchases the consumer water heater from a plumbing distributor, and in this case, DOE includes a contractor mark-up. In the 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 May 20, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM 21MYP130867 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 99 / Thursday, May 21, 2020 / Proposed Rules 
14This represents consumer water heaters that are 
purchased by commercial consumers for use in a 
commercial applications. 
15This represents consumer water heaters that are 
purchased by commercial consumers for use in a commercial applications. Unlike commercial consumers, residential consumers typically are unable to purchase from manufacturers through a national account. 16U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC 
10–K Reports (Available at https://www.sec.gov/ ) 
(Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
17Clear Seas Research, 2017 Top List—Premier 
Distributors—Plumbing, Heating, Cooling (Available at https://clearseasresearch.com/ product/2017-top-list-premier-distributors- plumbing-heating-cooling/) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
18HARDI, 2013 HARDI Profit Report (Available 
at: http://hardinet.org/ ) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
19U.S. Census Bureau, 2017 Annual Retail Trade 
Survey Data (Available at https://www.census.gov/ programs-surveys/arts.html) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). Note the 2018 Annual Retail Trade Survey data are expected to be released in April 2020. Until that time, 2017 Annual Retail Trade Survey remains the most recent full data release. 
20U.S. Census Bureau, 2012 Economic Census 
Data (Available at: https://www.census.gov/ 
programs-surveys/economic-census.html) (Last accessed Dec.2, 2019). Note that the 2017 Economic Census data are planned to be fully released by late 2020. Until that time, 2012 Economic Census remains the most recent full data release. 
21ACCA, Financial Analysis for the HVACR 
Contracting Industry (2005) (Available at: https://www.acca.org/store) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
22Reference for Business Encyclopedia of 
Business, 2nd ed. SIC 6515 Operators of Residential Mobile Home Sites (Available at: http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/industries/Finance- Insurance-Real-Estate/Operators-Residential- Mobile-Home-Sites.html) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019); Cook, P., State Board of Equalization, Staff Legislative Bill Analysis, Assembly Bill 1474 (2011) (Available at: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/ bill/asm/ab_ 1451-1500/ab_ 1474_ cfa_20090515_
114322_ asm_ comm.html) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 
2019); F. Walter, Comments on the Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Standards for Furnaces & Boilers, DOE Docket Number EE–RM/STD–01–350, Comment No.13 (2001) Manufactured Housing Institute (Available at: https://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;
D=EERE-2006-STD-0102-0042) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 23EIA, 2015 RECS (Available at: http://
www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). Note the EIA plans to conduct the 2020 RECS sometime in 2020, and it usually takes a couple of years to fully release the data. Until that time, 2015 RECS remains the most recent full data release. 
24EIA, 2012 CBECS (Available at: http://
www.eia.gov/consumption/commercial/) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). Note the 2018 CBECS data are expected to be released in late 2020. Until that time, 2012 CBECS remains the most recent full data release. case of mobile home new construction, 
the distribution channel includes a mobile home manufacturer and mobile home dealer. In addition, similar to the replacement and new owner distribution channel, DOE plans to consider distribution channels in which the manufacturer sells the consumer water heater directly to a commercial consumer through a national account or the commercial consumer purchases the consumer water heater directly through a wholesaler. 
In the case of new construction, DOE 
plans to characterize the distribution channels as follows: 
Manufacturer → Wholesaler → 
Contractor → General Contractor → 
Consumer 
Manufacturer → Retailer → Contractor 
→ General Contractor → Consumer 
Manufacturer → Wholesaler → General 
contractor → Consumer 
Manufacturer → Retailer → General 
contractor → Consumer 
Manufacturer → Wholesaler → 
Consumer 
Manufacturer → Retailer → Commercial 
Consumer
14 
Manufacturer → National Account → 
Commercial Consumer15 
Manufacturer → Mobile Home 
Manufacturer → Mobile Home Dealer 
→ Consumer 
Issue F.1 DOE seeks input on 
whether the distribution channels 
described above are appropriate for each of the consumer water heaters product classes and are sufficient to characterize distributions in this market. In particular, DOE seeks input on the appropriate distribution channel for grid-enabled water heaters. 
Issue F.2 DOE seeks input on the 
percentage of consumer water heaters being distributed through the different distribution channels and whether the share of products through each channel varies based on product capacity, water heater product class, or water heater technology. In particular, DOE seeks input about the percentage of consumer water heaters being distributed through online sales and whether the percentage is likely to increase in the future. 
2. Mark-Ups 
To develop mark-ups for the parties 
involved in the distribution of the 
product, DOE plans to utilize several sources, including: (1) Form 10–K 
reports
16from the main consumer water 
heater wholesalers17and retailers (for 
wholesalers and retailers); 3. the Heating, Air Conditioning & Refrigeration Distributors International (‘‘HARDI’’) 2013 Profit Report
18(for 
wholesalers); 3.U.S. Census 2017 
Annual Retail Trade Survey data19(for 
retailers); and 3. Census Bureau 2012 Economic Census data
20on the 
residential and commercial building construction industry (for general contractors, mechanical contractors, retailers, and mobile home manufacturers). DOE plans to use the 2005 Air Conditioning Contractors of America’s (‘‘ACCA’’) Financial Analysis on the Heating, Ventilation, Air- Conditioning, and Refrigeration (‘‘HVACR’’) contracting industry
21to 
disaggregate the mechanical contractor mark-ups into replacement and new construction markets. DOE also plans to use several sources for the derivation of the mobile home dealer mark-up.
22 
Issue F.3 DOE seeks recent data and 
recommendations regarding data sources to establish the markups for the parties involved with the distribution of 
the consumer water heating products. 
G. Energy Use Analysis 
As part of a typical rulemaking 
process, DOE conducts an energy use 
analysis to identify how products are used by consumers, and thereby determine the energy savings potential of energy efficiency improvements. The purpose of the energy use analysis is to determine the annual energy consumption of consumer water heaters at different efficiencies in representative U.S. single-family homes, manufactured housing, multi-family residences, and commercial buildings, and to assess the energy savings potential of increased consumer water heater efficiency. The energy use analysis estimates the range of energy use of consumer water heaters in the field (i.e., as they are actually 
used by consumers). The energy use analysis provides the basis for other analyses DOE performs, particularly assessments of the energy savings and the savings in consumer operating costs that could result from adoption of amended or new standards. DOE will estimate the annual energy consumption of consumer water heaters at specified energy efficiency levels across a range of applications, house or building types, and climate zones. The annual energy consumption includes use of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas (‘‘LPG’’), 
oil, or electricity for hot water production, as well as use of electricity for the auxiliary components. 
1. Building Sample 
DOE intends to base the energy use 
analysis on key characteristics from the 
Energy Information Administration’s (‘‘EIA’’) 2015 Residential Energy Consumption Survey (‘‘RECS’’)
23for the 
subset of building types that use consumer water heating products covered by the standard. DOE also plans to look at the use of consumer water heaters in commercial applications, for which it plans to include characteristics from EIA’s 2012 Commercial Building Energy Consumption Survey (‘‘CBECS’’)
24for a subset of building 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 May 20, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM 21MYP130868 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 99 / Thursday, May 21, 2020 / Proposed Rules 
25Neither RECS nor CBECS provide data on 
whether the water heater used in the building is a 
consumer water heater covered in this rulemaking (i.e., water heating could also be provided by a 
consumer boiler, commercial boiler, or commercial water heater). Therefore, DOE intends to develop a methodology for adjusting its building sample to reflect buildings that use a consumer water heater covered in this rulemaking based on ASHRAE and EPRI handbooks and other references on how consumer water heaters are typically used in residential and commercial applications. 
26If shipments data are not available for a 
considered product class, DOE intends to use any other available data including number of available models. 
27Building America, DOE, Strategy Guideline: 
Proper Water Heater Selection (Available at: https:// 
www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/publications/pdfs/ 
building_ america/strategy-guideline-water-heater- 
selection.pdf) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
28ASHRAE, ASHRAE Handbook of HVAC 
Applications: Chapter 50 (Service Water Heating) (2011) pp. 50.1 to 50.32. 
29EPRI, Commercial Water Heating Applications 
Handbook (1992) CU–6666. 
30Bonneville Power Administration, ELCAP Data 
from 1986 to 1989 (2012) (Available at: http://rtf.nwcouncil.org/ELCAP/) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
31NEEA, Residential Building Stock Assessment 
(2016) (Available at: https://neea.org/data/ residential-building-stock-assessment) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
32NEEA, Commercial Building Stock Assessment 
(2014) (Available at: https://neea.org/data/ commercial-building-stock-assessments) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 33New York State Energy Research and 
Development Authority (‘‘NYSERDA’’), Residential Statewide Baseline Study of New York State (July 2015) (Available at: https://www.nyserda.ny.gov/ About/Publications/Building-Stock-and-Potential- Studies/Residential-Statewide-Baseline-Study-of- New-York-State) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
34CEC, 2009 RASS (2009) (Available at: https:// 
ww2.energy.ca.gov/appliances/rass/previous_
rass.html) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). Note the 2019 RASS data are expected to be completed in March 2020. Until that time, 2009 RASS remains the most recent full data release. 
35CEC, 2006 CEUS (2006) (Available at: http://
www.energy.ca.gov/ceus/2006_ enduse.html) (Last 
accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
36EIA estimates the equipment’s annual energy 
consumption from the household’s utility bills using conditional demand analysis. 37Danny Parker, Fairey, P, and Lutz, J., 
Estimating Daily Domestic Hot Water Use in North 
American Homes, Florida Solar Energy Center (June 2015) (Available at: http://www.fsec.ucf.edu/en/publications/pdf/FSEC-PF-464-15.pdf ) (Last 
accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
38Lutz, J.D., X. Liu, J.E. McMahon, C. Dunham, 
L.J. Shown, and Q.T. McGrue, Modeling Patterns of 
Hot Water Use in Households (1996) LBNL (LBL– 37805) (Available at: https://ees.lbl.gov/sites/all/files/modeling_ patterns_ of_hot_water_ use_in_
households_ lbl-37805_ rev.pdf) (Last accessed Dec. 
2, 2019). 
39The Water Research Foundation, Residential 
End Uses of Water, Version 2 (June 2019) (Available at: https://www.waterrf.org/research/projects/
residential-end-uses-water-version-2 ) (Last accessed 
Dec. 2, 2019); Kruis, N., B. Wilcox, J. Lutz, C. Barnaby, Development of Realistic Water Draw Profiles for California Residential Water Heating Energy Estimation (August 2017) (Available at: http://www.ibpsa.org/proceedings/BS2017/BS2017 _
237.pdf) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019); Lutz, JD, Renaldi, Lekov A, Qin Y, and Melody M., ‘‘Hot Water Draw Patterns in Single Family Houses: Findings from Field Studies,’’ LBNL Report number LBNL–4830E (May 2011) (Available at: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/2k24v1kj ) (Last 
accessed Dec. 2, 2019); NREL, Tool for Generating Realistic Residential Hot Water Event Schedules (August 2010) (Available at: https://www.ibpsa.us/ 
sites/default/files/publications/SB10-PPT-TS06B- 
01-Hendron.pdf) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
40NREL, DOE Commercial Reference Building 
Models of the National Building Stock (February 2011) (Available at: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy11osti/46861.pdf ) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
41Huang, J., Akbari, H., Rainer, L., Ritschard, R., 
481 Prototypical Commercial Buildings for 20 types that use consumer water heating 
products covered by this standard. 
RECS and CBECS survey data include 
information on the physical characteristics of building units, water heating products used, size of the products in terms of rated volume, fuels used, energy consumption and expenditures, and other characteristics.
25DOE intends to use 
available shipments data by water heater size to disaggregate the sample into the considered product classes.
26 
DOE will also consult Building America’s 2015 report, ‘‘Strategy Guideline: Proper Water Heater Selection,’’
27as well as American 
Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (‘‘ASHRAE’’)
28and Electric Power 
Research Institute (‘‘EPRI’’)29 
handbooks, which contain data on the typical categories and sizes (both input capacity and rated volume) of consumer water heaters used for different building types and applications, and can be used to compare to, supplement, and corroborate the RECS and CBECS data. In addition, DOE intends to review other data sets (e.g., data from the End- 
Use Load and Consumer Assessment Program (‘‘ELCAP’’),
302016 Residential 
Building Stock Assessment for the Northwest,
312014 Commercial Building 
Stock Assessment for the Northwest,32 
2015 Residential Statewide Baseline Study of New York State,332009 
Residential Appliance Saturation Study 
(‘‘RASS’’),34and 2006 California 
Commercial End-Use Survey (‘‘CEUS’’)
35) to compare to RECS 2015 
and CBECS 2012 data. Based on these data, DOE will develop a representative population of buildings for each consumer water heater product class. Calculating the hot water use for the sampled households requires assigning a specific water heater size (rated volume). DOE plans to use the RECS sizing data together with the available shipments and models data to assign the 
consumer water heaters sizes for each sampled RECS household. 
Issue G.1 DOE seeks shipments data 
and input on typical categories (in terms of product classes) and sizes (including fuel type, input capacity, and rated volume) of consumer water heaters used for different building types and applications. 
Issue G.2 DOE seeks input and 
sources of data or recommendations to support sizing of consumer water heaters typical in consumer water heater applications. 
Issue G.3 DOE requests comment on 
the fraction of installations and classes of consumer water heaters that are used in commercial applications. 
2. Hot Water Use 
To estimate the annual hot water use 
of each sampled unit, DOE intends to 
use the RECS 2015 and CBECS 2012 estimates of water heating annual energy consumption
36together with the 
existing water heater’s estimated efficiency and other water heater characteristics. DOE intends to assume that some households or buildings have multiple water heaters, with the hot water use split evenly between them. The efficiency of the existing water heater will be determined using the consumer water heater vintage (the year of installation of the product) provided by RECS and historical efficiency data 
for water heaters. 
DOE plans to compare the results of 
its methodology to total hot water use from field data, models based on field data (such as the 2015 Florida Solar Energy Center study
37and the model 
used in the April 2010 Final Rule (75 FR 20112)
38), and any other model or data 
available in the literature. These total hot water use models typically account for the number and ages of the people who live in the household, the way they consume hot water, the presence of hot- water-using appliances, the tank size and thermostat set point of the consumer water heater, and the climate in which the residence is situated. DOE also plans to consider data regarding the total amount of water drawn per day for various draw patterns based on the field data collated by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (‘‘LBNL’’) and other sources.
39 
For each analyzed consumer water 
heater and building type combination, DOE plans to determine the typical water heating usage profiles, water volumetric loads, and hot water usage temperatures using data from the ASHRAE Heating, Ventilation, and Air- Conditioning (‘‘HVAC’’) Systems and Equipment Handbook, EPRI Handbook, and reports from National Renewable Energy Laboratory (‘‘NREL’’)
40and 
LBNL.41For residential applications, 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 May 20, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM 21MYP130869 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 99 / Thursday, May 21, 2020 / Proposed Rules 
Urban Market Areas, LBL–29798 (April 1991) 
(Available at: http://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/dirpubs/29798.pdf) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
42Clear Seas Research, 2019 Mechanical 
Systems—Water Heater CLEAReport (Dec. 2019) (Available at: https://clearseasresearch.com/product/2019-mechanical-systems-water-heater/) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
43Burch, J.a.C.C., Towards Development of an 
Algorithm for Mains Water Temperature, NREL (Available at: https://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/ 981988) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019); Hendron, R., R. Anderson, C. Christensen, M. Eastment, and P. Reeves, Development of an Energy Savings Benchmark for All Residential End-Uses (August 2004) NREL, Report No. NREL/BK–610–28044 (Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.577.9027&rep=rep1&type=pdf) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
44Lutz, J., C.D. Whitehead, A. Lekov, D. 
Winiarski, and G. Rosenquist, WHAM: A Simplified Energy Consumption Equation for Water Heaters, in 1998 American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (‘‘ACEEE’’) Summer Study on Energy 
Efficiency in Buildings (1998): Asilomar, CA. p. 1.171–1.183 (Available at: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/20001984-wham-simplified-energy-consumption-equation-water-heaters ) (Last 
accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
45Heat pump water heaters draw heat from the 
space in which they are located. Thus, when such a water heater is located in a conditioned space, its operation affects the load that the home’s space heating and air conditioning equipment must meet. When the home is being heated, use of the heat pump water heater increases the heating load, and when the house is being cooled, its use decreases the cooling load. 
46Specifically, DOE plans to utilize the 
household types defined in RECS 2015, as well as 
commercial building types in CBECS 2012 that use consumer water heaters. DOE plans to determine average set 
point temperature by using the 2006– 2019 survey data from plumbing/ hydronic heating contractor firms.
42 
These data will capture the variability in water heating use due to factors such as building activity, schedule, occupancy, water supply temperature, tank losses, cycling losses, and 
distribution system piping losses. DOE intends to derive the inlet water temperature using an approach developed by NREL.
43This approach 
accounts for seasonal variations in inlet water temperature as a function of annual average outdoor air temperature. The monthly average inlet water temperature varies directly with the average annual outdoor air temperature corrected by an offset term. 
DOE also plans to consider market 
changes or future efficiency standards in technologies that reduce water heating loads in residential housing or commercial buildings using consumer water heaters, such as more-efficient clothes washers. 
Issue G.4 DOE seeks field data and 
input on representative hot water usage, water heating usage load profile, and representative hot water usage temperatures for consumer water heaters used in various consumer and commercial water heater applications. 
Issue G.5 DOE seeks input on the 
historical distribution of product efficiencies in the building population for different product classes. 
Issue G.6 DOE seeks input on water 
use data by season to more accurately calculate the inlet water temperature. 
3. Determination of Consumer Water 
Heating Energy Use 
In the past, DOE calculated the field 
energy use of water heaters using a simplified energy equation, the consumer water heater analysis model (‘‘WHAM’’),
44and modified WHAM equations developed for the April 2010 
Final Rule. WHAM accounts for a range of operating conditions and energy efficiency characteristics of water heaters. To describe energy efficiency characteristics of water heaters, WHAM uses parameters that were also used in the previous consumer water heater test procedure. DOE intends to create a similar set of equations to determine field energy use based on the most recent consumer water heater test procedure, which determines UEF. 
For gas-fired and oil-fired water 
heaters, DOE plans to estimate the auxiliary electricity use associated with water heater operation, such as that consumed by the electronic ignition, controls, power vent fan, standby mode and off mode, etc. For heat pump water 
heaters, DOE plans to take into account that the energy efficiency and consumption are dependent on ambient temperature when in heat pump mode and the amount of time the unit operates using the electric resistance mode. DOE also intends to estimate the impact of heat pump water heaters on the home’s space heating, air conditioning, and dehumidifier operation.
45DOE also plans to take into 
account the electricity use associated with condensate withdrawal, such as that consumed by the condensate pump or heat tape for condensing and heat pump water heater technologies. For grid-enabled water heaters, DOE plans to use common draw patterns and utility program structure (i.e., turned off 
at a fixed schedule or turned off during peak periods only) to determine the electricity use and match it with the appropriate electricity tariff structure. 
Issue G.7 DOE requests field or test 
energy use data or other relevant information that could assist in the development of an equation or set of equations based on the latest consumer water heater test procedure that can calculate field water heating energy use for each product class. 
Issue G.8 DOE requests comment on 
the methodology for determining energy use for each consumer water heater product class, including the impact of ambient conditions and draw patterns. Issue G.9 DOE requests comment on 
the methodology for determining energy use of heat pump water heaters, including the impact of ambient conditions and draw patterns on efficiency, as well as taking into account the cooling effect and humidity withdrawal of heat pump water heaters installed in conditioned spaces. 
Issue G.10 DOE requests comment 
on the methodology for determining energy use for grid-enabled water heaters. 
Issue G.11 DOE requests comment 
on the fraction of installations and classes of consumer water heaters used for other applications such as space heating (in hydronic systems or fan- coils). 
Issue G.12 DOE seeks input on the 
fraction of installations and types of buildings that use recirculation loops associated with consumer water heaters and the impact of recirculation loops on water heater performance. 
H. Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period 
Analysis 
DOE plans to conduct LCC and PBP 
analyses to evaluate the economic impacts on individual consumers of potential energy conservation standards for consumer water heaters. The effect of new or amended energy conservation standards on individual consumers usually involves a reduction in operating cost and an increase in purchase cost. 
DOE intends to analyze the potential 
for variability by performing the LCC and PBP calculations on a representative sample of individual consumers. DOE plans to utilize the sample of buildings developed for the energy use analysis and the corresponding simulation results.
46 
Within a given building, one or more consumer water heater units may serve the building’s water heating needs, depending on the hot water requirements of the building. Therefore, DOE intends to express the LCC and PBP results for each of the individual consumer water heaters installed in the building. DOE plans to model uncertainty in many of the inputs to the LCC and PBP analysis using Monte Carlo simulation and probability distributions. As a result, the LCC and PBP results will be displayed as distributions of impacts compared to the no-new-standards case (i.e., without 
amended standards) conditions. 
Issue H.1 DOE requests comment on 
the overall methodology that it intends 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 May 20, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM 21MYP130870 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 99 / Thursday, May 21, 2020 / Proposed Rules 
47Bay Area Air Quality Management District, 
Regulation 9: Inorganic Gaseous Pollutants; Rule 6: 
Nitrogen Oxides Emissions from Natural Gas-Fired Boilers and Water Heaters (Available at: https://www.arb.ca.gov/drdb/ba/curhtml/r9-6.pdf) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
48Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality 
Management District, Rule 414: Water Heaters, Boilers and Process Heaters Rated Less Than 1,000,000 BTU PER HOUR Adopted 08–01–96 (Amended 03–25–10) (Available at: http://www.airquality.org/ProgramCoordination/ Documents/rule414.pdf) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
49San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control 
District, Rule 4902: Residential Water Heaters (Adopted June 17, 1993; Amended March 19, 2009) (Available at: http://valleyair.org/rules/currntrules/ r4902.pdf) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
50Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control 
District, Rule 352: Natural Gas-Fired Fan-Type Central Furnaces and Small Water Heaters (Adopted 9/16/1999, revised 10/20/2011) (Available at: https://www.ourair.org/wp-content/uploads/ 
rule352.pdf) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
51South Coast Air Quality Management District, 
Rule 1121: Control of Nitrogen Oxides from Residential Type, Natural Gas-Fired Water Heaters (Adopted Dec. 1, 1978; Amended Mar. 10, 1995; Amended Dec. 10, 1999; Amended Sept. 3, 2004) (Available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/home/ regulations/rules/support-documents/rule-1121) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
52Ventura County Air Quality Management 
District, Rule 74–11: Natural Gas-Fired Water Heaters (Available at: http://www.vcapcd.org/pubs/ Advisories/7411/Ru7411Revision2010.pdf) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
53Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District, 
Rule 2.37: Natural Gas-Fired Water Heaters and Small Boilers (Adopted Nov. 9, 1994; Revised April 8, 2009) (Available at: https://www.arb.ca.gov/ DRDB/YS/CURHTML/R2-37.pdf) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
54RS Means, 2020 Mechanical Cost Data 
(Available at: https://www.rsmeans.com/products/ books/cost-books.aspx) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). to use to conduct the LCC and PBP 
analysis for consumer water heaters. 
Inputs to the LCC and PBP analysis 
are categorized as: (1) Inputs for establishing the purchase expense, otherwise known as the total installed cost, and (2) inputs for calculating the operating costs. Each type of input is discussed in the paragraphs that follow. 
1. Total Installed Cost 
The primary inputs for establishing 
the total installed cost are the baseline 
consumer price, standard-level customer price increases, and installation costs. Baseline consumer prices and standard-level consumer price increases will be determined by applying markups to manufacturer selling price estimates and sales tax. For gas-fired water heaters, DOE intends to take into account location where ultra- low-NO
Xgas-fired water heaters would 
be required by the compliance date for any amended standards, such as the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (‘‘AQMD’’) (Regulation 9, Rule 6),
47 
Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD (Rule 
414),48San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution 
Control District (‘‘APCD’’) (Rule 4902),49 
Santa Barbara County APCD (Rule 352),
50South Coast AQMD (Rule 
1112),51Ventura County AQMD (Rule 
74–11),52and Yolo-Solano AQMD (Rule 
2.37).53 Issue H.2 DOE seeks input on 
locations requiring ultra-low-NO Xgas- 
fired water heaters. 
The installation cost is added to the 
consumer price to arrive at a total 
installed cost. DOE intends to develop installation costs using the most recent RS Means data available.
54DOE also 
intends to use regional labor costs to more accurately estimate installation costs by applying the appropriate regional labor cost from RS Means to each sampled household or building. 
For water heaters in new homes, DOE 
plans to include basic installation cost, such as adding a gas line branch and/ or electrical connection and water piping, in addition to putting the new water heater in place and additional set- up. For natural draft venting gas-fired water heaters in new construction, DOE plans to account for both commonly- vented water heaters (together with a central furnace) and isolated water heaters (separately vented). For replacement cases, DOE plans to include the installation cost associated with disconnecting and removing the old water heater, removal/disposal fees, permit fees, as well as the cost of putting the new water heater in place and additional set-up. 
DOE also intends to account for 
additional labor costs associated with larger water heaters, replacing a larger drain pan, and potential space- constraint issues when the original 
water heater location is too small to accommodate the replacement water heater. DOE also intends to add any costs associated with updating or repairing existing flue venting including vent resizing and chimney relining. For efficiency levels that include electronic ignition, power vent, or condensing design, DOE intends to add the cost of installing an electrical outlet, a new venting system, and any additional cost for condensate disposal. For heat pump water heater installation, DOE intends to apply several additional costs, including one additional hour of labor for the extra time required to install this product, potential space-constraint issues, adding condensate withdrawal, and adding ductwork for supply and/or outlet air from the heat pump component (including adding louvered doors for water heaters installed in indoor closets). 
Issue H.3 DOE seeks input on the 
approach and data sources it intends to use to develop installation costs, 
specifically, its intention to use the most recent RS Means Mechanical Cost Data. 
Issue H.4 DOE seeks input on the 
fraction and categories of water heaters that encounter space-constraint issues 
(such as impact of height and width on installation space constraints or constraints in getting the consumer water heater through attic or closet doors). 
Issue H.5 DOE seeks input on issues 
and costs associated with venting of flue gases of gas-fired storage and instantaneous water heaters, in particular regarding retrofit issues related to installing a new vent system for power vent and condensing water heaters, disconnecting the existing water heater from non-condensing furnace common venting system, and upgrading existing non-condensing venting (chimney relining or vent resizing). DOE also seeks input on how often and in what applications direct venting or sealed combustion are used or required. 
Issue H.6 DOE seeks input on issues 
and costs associated with condensate disposal for condensing gas-fired storage and instantaneous water heaters, specifically how often and in what applications a condensate filter is installed or a condensate pump is installed. 
Issue H.7 DOE seeks input on issues 
and costs associated with installing consumer water heaters in multi-family buildings and mobile homes. 
Issue H.8 DOE seeks input on issues 
and costs associated with installing heat pump water heaters, including adjustment of electrical circuits, additional labor, space constraints, adding condensate withdrawal, and adding ductwork for supply and/or outlet air from the heat pump component. 
Issue H.9 DOE seeks input on issues 
and costs associated with installing consumer water heaters with large input capacities, such as instantaneous natural gas water heaters, when replacing an existing smaller capacity natural gas storage water heater. DOE requests comment on how often a new larger gas pipe is required. 
2. Operating Costs 
The primary inputs for calculating the 
operating costs are energy consumption, 
product efficiency, energy prices, maintenance and repair costs, product lifetime, and discount rates. Both product lifetime and discount rates are used to calculate the present value of future operating costs. 
The relevant energy consumption is 
the site energy use associated with 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 May 20, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM 21MYP130871 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 99 / Thursday, May 21, 2020 / Proposed Rules 
55EIA, Survey form EIA–861—Annual Electric 
Power Industry Report (Available at: https://
www.eia.gov/electricity/) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
56EIA, Natural Gas Navigator (Available at: http:// 
www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_ pri_sum_ dcu_ nus_ m.htm) 
(Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
57EIA, SEDS (Available at: http://www.eia.gov/ 
state/seds/) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
58EIA, AEO Full Version (Available at: https://
www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
59RS Means, 2020 Facilities Maintenance & 
Repair Cost Data (Available at: https://www.rsmeans.com/products/books/cost- books.aspx) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 60RS Means, 2020 Facilities Maintenance & 
Repair Cost Data (Available at: https://www.rsmeans.com/products/books/cost-books.aspx) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
61Lutz, J., A. Hopkins, V. Letschert, V. Franco, 
and A. Sturges, Using national survey data to estimate lifetimes of residential appliances, HVAC&R Research, 2011. 17(5): pp. 28 (Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10789669.2011.558166 ) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 
2019). 
62If the data are available, DOE also plans to take 
into account differences in consumer water heater 
lifetime based on usage and application of the consumer water heater. 
63The Federal Reserve Board, SCF (1995, 1998, 
2001, 2004, 2007, 2010, 2013, and 2016) (Available at: https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/ 
scfindex.htm) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
64Damodaran, A., Data Page: Historical Returns 
on Stocks, Bonds and Bills-United States (Available 
at: http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/∼adamodar/) (Last 
accessed Dec. 2, 2019); Moody’s, Moody’s Seasoned AAA Corporate Bond Yield [AAA], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Available at: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/AAA ) (Last 
accessed Dec. 2, 2019); Wells Fargo, Wells Fargo Cost of Savings Index (‘‘COSI’’) (Available at: https://www.wellsfargo.com/mortgage/manage- account/cost-of-savings-index/) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019); National Bureau of Economic Research, Marginal Income Tax Rates by Income Type (Available at: http://users.nber.org/∼taxsim/ marginal-tax-rates/) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019); U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, State and Local Bonds—Bond Buyer Go 20- Bond Municipal Bond Index (DISCONTINUED) [WSLB20], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Available at: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/WSLB20) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019); U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 30-Year Treasury Constant Maturity Rate [DGS30], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Available at: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DGS30 ) (Last 
accessed Dec. 2, 2019); Organisation for Economic 
Continued providing water heating to the building. 
(The primary energy used to provide electricity for electric water heaters is accounted for in the NIA.) DOE intends to utilize the energy use calculation methodology described in section II.G of this document to determine water heater energy use. 
DOE intends to determine recent gas, 
oil, and electricity prices based on geographically-available fuel cost data such as State level data, with consideration for the variation in energy costs paid by consumers living in different building types. DOE calculates energy expenses based on estimated marginal energy prices that customers are paying in different geographical areas of the country. DOE may consider data provided by EIA’s Form EIA–861
55 
to calculate residential and commercial electricity prices, EIA’s Natural Gas Navigator
56to calculate residential and 
commercial natural gas prices, and EIA’s State Energy Data Systems (‘‘SEDS’’)
57to calculate liquefied 
petroleum gas (LPG) and fuel oil prices. Future energy prices will be projected using trends from the latest Annual Energy Outlook (‘‘AEO’’).
58 
Issue H.10 DOE seeks comment on 
its planned approach and sources for developing gas, oil, and electricity prices. 
Maintenance costs are expenses 
associated with ensuring continued operation of the covered product over time. DOE intends to develop maintenance costs using the most recent RS Means data available
59and 
manufacturer product literature. DOE intends to assess whether maintenance costs vary with product efficiency and product category. In addition, DOE plans to consider the cases when the product is covered by service and/or maintenance agreements. More specifically, DOE intends to account for the following: (1) Maintenance cost associated with storage water heaters being drained and flushed annually to minimize deposition of sediment, maintain operating efficiency, and prolong product life; (2) any maintenance cost associated with the flammable vapor ignition resistant (‘‘FVIR’’) component of gas-fired storage water heaters; (3) for a heat pump water heater, the cost of annual cleaning of the air filter and a preventive maintenance cost to check the evaporator and refrigeration system; (4) for gas-fired instantaneous water heaters, maintenance costs associated with the fouling of the heat exchanger from hard water, periodic sensor inspections, and filter changes; and (5) for oil-fired storage water heaters, the cost of annual maintenance contracts, which are available for this product category. 
Issue H.11 DOE seeks input on the 
approach and data sources it intends to use to develop maintenance costs, specifically, its intention to use the most recent RS Means Facilities Maintenance & Repair Cost Data and to consider the cost of service and/or maintenance agreements. 
Repair costs are expenses associated 
with repairing or replacing components of the covered product that have failed. DOE intends to develop maintenance costs using the most recent RS Means data available
60and manufacturer 
literature. DOE intends to assess whether repair costs vary with product efficiency and product category. DOE intends to include repair cost for components that are more likely to fail during the consumer water heater’s lifetime, such as pilot ignition, electronic ignition, and power vent fan for gas-fired water heaters; and electric resistance element, compressor, and the evaporator fan for electric water heaters. For oil-fired storage water heaters, DOE intends to calculate the cost of annual maintenance contracts, which typically include repair/replacement of failed components. 
Issue H.12 DOE seeks comment as to 
whether water heater repair costs vary as a function of product efficiency. DOE also requests any data or information on developing repair costs. 
Product lifetime is the age at which a 
unit is retired from service. DOE intends to conduct an analysis of water heater lifetimes using a combination of data on shipments, the consumer water heater stock, and RECS data on the age of existing water heaters in the sampled homes based on a methodology described in a journal article.
61The data allow DOE to develop a Weibull 
probability distribution to characterize consumer water heater lifetime, which provides a range from minimum to maximum lifetime, as well as an average lifetime.
62 
Issue H.13 DOE seeks comment on 
its planned approach of using a Weibull probability distribution to characterize product lifetime. DOE also requests product lifetime data and information on whether product lifetime varies based on product characteristics, product application, or product efficiency. 
In the calculation of LCC, DOE 
applies discount rates appropriate to households to estimate the present value of future operating costs. The discount rate used in the LCC analysis represents the rate from an individual consumer’s perspective. DOE estimates a distribution of residential discount rates based on the opportunity cost of funds related to appliance energy cost savings and maintenance costs. DOE estimates commercial discount rates as the weighted average cost of capital (‘‘WACC’’), using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (‘‘CAPM’’). 
To establish residential discount rates 
for the LCC analysis, DOE intends to use the Federal Reserve Board’s Survey of Consumer Finances
63(‘‘SCF’’) for 1995, 
1998, 2001, 2004, 2007, 2010, 2013, and 2016 data, as well as other data sources,
64to develop a distribution of 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 May 20, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM 21MYP130872 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 99 / Thursday, May 21, 2020 / Proposed Rules 
Co-operation and Development (‘‘OECD’’), Short- 
term interest rates (indicator) (Available at https:// 
data.oecd.org/interest/short-term-interest-rates.htm) 
(Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019); U.S. Department of Labor–Bureau of Labor Statistics, Bureau of Labor Statistics Data, Consumer Price Index (2018) (Available at: http://data.bls.gov ) (Last accessed 
Dec. 2, 2019). 
65Damodaran A., Data Page: Costs of Capital by 
Industry Sector (Available at: http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/∼adamodar/) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
66AHRI provided to DOE 2002–2006 shipments 
data by energy factor (EF) bins for gas-fired storage 
water heaters (40 gallons) and oil-fired storage water heaters (50 gallon). In addition, AHRI 
provided LBNL 2004–2007 shipments data by energy factor (EF) bins for gas-fired instantaneous 
water heaters. 
67ENERGY STAR, 2010–2018 Unit Shipment 
Data (Available at: https://www.energystar.gov/ index.cfm?c=partners.unit_ shipment_ data) (Last 
accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
68DOE, Compliance Certification Database 
(Available at: https://www.regulations.doe.gov/ certification-data/CCMS-4-Water_Heaters.html#q=Product_ Group_
s%3A%22Water%20Heaters%22) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 69AHRI, Directory of Certified Product 
Performance for Residential Water Heaters 
(Available at: https://www.ahridirectory.org/ NewSearch?programId=24&searchTypeId=3) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
70CEC, Appliance Efficiency Database (Available 
at: https://cacertappliances.energy.ca.gov/Pages/ 
ApplianceSearch.aspx) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
71ENERGY STAR, ENERGY STAR Certified 
Water Heaters Directory (Available at: https://www.energystar.gov/productfinder/product/ certified-water-heaters/results) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). discount rates by income group to 
represent the rates that may apply in the year in which potential amended standards would take effect. For commercial discount rates, DOE intends to use Damodaran Online, which is a widely used source of information about company debt and equity financing for most types of firms, as the primary source of data.
65 
Issue H.14 DOE seeks comment on 
its planned discount rate methodology. 
DOE measures LCC and PBP impacts 
of potential standard levels relative to a no-new-standards case that reflects the likely market in the absence of amended standards. DOE plans to develop market-share efficiency data (i.e., the 
distribution of product shipments by efficiency) for the product classes DOE is considering, for the year in which 
compliance with any potential amended standards would be required. To 
estimate the market shares of different water heater energy efficiency levels in the no-new-standards case, DOE intends to use historical data provided by AHRI for the April 2010 Final Rule,
66along 
with more recent data that may be 
provided by stakeholders. DOE also intends to use 2010–2018 ENERGY STAR shipments data.
67Because these 
data may not cover all of the energy efficiency levels under consideration, DOE also intends to use data on the number of water heater models at different energy efficiency levels, as reported in DOE’s compliance certification database,
68the AHRI 
directory of certified product performance,
69the California Energy 
Commission (‘‘CEC’’) appliance efficiency database,
70and the ENERGY STAR certified water heaters 
directory.71 
Issue H.15 DOE requests shipments 
data for consumer water heaters, broken 
down by product class, that show current market shares by efficiency level. DOE also seeks input on similar historic data. 
A table of the types of data requested 
for shipments in Issue H.15 can be found in Table II.7 and Table II.8. Table II.7 represents efficiency data from 2007–2015 based on EF metric based on the test procedure that was effective prior to December 31, 2015, while Table II.8 represents efficiency data from 2016–2018 based on the amended test procedure using the UEF metric. Interested parties are also encouraged to provide additional shipment data as may be relevant. 
TABLE II.7—S UMMARY TABLE OF SHIPMENTS -RELATED DATAREQUESTS FROM 2007 TO2015 BYEF B INSUSING TEST 
PROCEDURE PRIOR TO DECEMBER 31, 2015 BYPRODUCT CLASS AND REPRESENTATIVE RATED VOLUMES * 
EF bins Historical shipments 
(millions) 
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 
Gas-Fired Storage Water Heaters, 40 gal 
0.59–0.60 ......................................................................... ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............
0.61–0.63 ......................................................................... ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............
0.64–0.69 ......................................................................... ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............
0.70 and above ................................................................ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............
Oil-Fired Storage Water Heaters, 32 gal 
0.53–0.61 ......................................................................... ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............
0.62–0.65 ......................................................................... ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............
0.66–0.67 ......................................................................... ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............
0.68 and above ................................................................ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............
Electric Storage Water Heaters, 50 gal 
0.90 .................................................................................. ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............
0.91–0.93 ......................................................................... ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............
0.94–0.96 ......................................................................... ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............
0.97–2.49 ......................................................................... ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............
2.50–2.99 ......................................................................... ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............
3.00 and above ................................................................ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............
Electric Storage Water Heaters, 80 gal 
0.86–0.96 ......................................................................... ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............
0.97–2.49 ......................................................................... ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............
2.50–2.99 ......................................................................... ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 May 20, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM 21MYP130873 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 99 / Thursday, May 21, 2020 / Proposed Rules 
TABLE II.7—S UMMARY TABLE OF SHIPMENTS -RELATED DATAREQUESTS FROM 2007 TO2015 BYEF B INSUSING TEST 
PROCEDURE PRIOR TO DECEMBER 31, 2015 BYPRODUCT CLASS AND REPRESENTATIVE RATED VOLUMES *—Continued 
EF bins Historical shipments 
(millions) 
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 
3.00 and above ................................................................ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............
Gas-Fired Instantaneous Water Heaters, All 
0.62–0.77 ......................................................................... ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............
0.78–0.80 ......................................................................... ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............
0.81–0.82 ......................................................................... ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............
0.83–0.86 ......................................................................... ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............
0.87–0.92 ......................................................................... ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............
0.93–0.94 ......................................................................... ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............
0.95 and above ................................................................ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............
Grid-Enabled Water Heaters, 80 gal 
0.86–0.91 ......................................................................... ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............
0.92 .................................................................................. ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............
0.93–0.95 ......................................................................... ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............
0.96 and above ................................................................ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............
* Any additional shipments by efficiency bins data for additional rated volumes, such as 50 or 30 gallons for gas-fired storage water heaters, 50 
gallon oil-fired storage water heaters, 30, 40, or 67 gallons for electric storage water heaters, or 100 gallon for grid-enabled water heaters are 
welcome. In addition, any data for any other product classes are also welcome. 
TABLE II.8—S UMMARY TABLE OF SHIPMENTS -RELATED DATAREQUESTS FROM 2016–2018 BYUNIFORM ENERGY FACTOR  
(UEF) B INSUSING TESTPROCEDURE AFTER DECEMBER 31, 2015 BYPRODUCT CLASS AND REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY * 
UEF bins Historical shipments 
(millions) 
2016 2017 2018 
Gas-Fired Storage Water Heaters, 38 gal, Medium Draw Pattern 
0.58 .............................................................................................................................................. ........................ ........................ ........................
0.59–0.60 ..................................................................................................................................... ........................ ........................ ........................
0.61–0.63 ..................................................................................................................................... ........................ ........................ ........................
0.64–0.66 ..................................................................................................................................... ........................ ........................ ........................
0.67–0.69 ..................................................................................................................................... ........................ ........................ ........................
0.70 and above ................................................................................................................. ........... ........................ ........................ ........................
Oil-Fired Storage Water Heaters, 30 gal, High Draw Pattern 
0.62–0.65 ..................................................................................................................................... ........................ ........................ ........................
0.66–0.67 ..................................................................................................................................... ........................ ........................ ........................
0.68 and above ................................................................................................................. ........... ........................ ........................ ........................
Electric Storage Water Heaters, 46 gal, Medium Draw Pattern 
0.92 .............................................................................................................................................. ........................ ........................ ........................
0.93–0.96 ..................................................................................................................................... ........................ ........................ ........................
0.97–2.49 ..................................................................................................................................... ........................ ........................ ........................
2.50–2.99 ..................................................................................................................................... ........................ ........................ ........................
3.00 and above ................................................................................................................. ........... ........................ ........................ ........................
Electric Storage Water Heaters, 80 gal, High Draw Pattern 
2.00–2.49 ..................................................................................................................................... ........................ ........................ ........................
2.50–3.00 ..................................................................................................................................... ........................ ........................ ........................
3.00 and above ................................................................................................................. ........... ........................ ........................ ........................
Gas-Fired Instantaneous Water Heaters, All 
0.81 .............................................................................................................................................. ........................ ........................ ........................
0.82–0.86 ..................................................................................................................................... ........................ ........................ ........................
0.87–0.92 ..................................................................................................................................... ........................ ........................ ........................
0.93–0.94 ..................................................................................................................................... ........................ ........................ ........................
0.95 and above ................................................................................................................. ........... ........................ ........................ ........................
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:25 May 20, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM 21MYP130874 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 99 / Thursday, May 21, 2020 / Proposed Rules 
72AHRI, Statistical Release: 1988–1995 data from 
the Gas Appliance Manufacturers Association 
(‘‘GAMA’’) (1999); U.S. Department of Commerce- Bureau of the Census, Current Industrial Reports for Major Household Appliances (MA335F), 2003–2010 (Available at: https://www.census.gov/data/tables/ time-series/econ/cir/ma335f.html) (Last accessed 
Dec. 2, 2019). TABLE II.8—S UMMARY TABLE OF SHIPMENTS -RELATED DATAREQUESTS FROM 2016–2018 BYUNIFORM ENERGY FACTOR  
(UEF) B INSUSING TESTPROCEDURE AFTER DECEMBER 31, 2015 BYPRODUCT CLASS AND REPRESENTATIVE CA-
PACITY *—Continued 
UEF bins Historical shipments 
(millions) 
2016 2017 2018 
Grid-Enabled Water Heaters, 80 gal, High Draw Pattern 
0.90–0.91 ..................................................................................................................................... ........................ ........................ ........................
0.92 .............................................................................................................................................. ........................ ........................ ........................
0.93–0.95 ..................................................................................................................................... ........................ ........................ ........................
0.96 and above ................................................................................................................. ........... ........................ ........................ ........................
* Any additional shipments by efficiency bins data for additional rated volumes, such as 48 gallon (high draw) for gas-fired storage water heat-
ers, 48 gallon (high draw) oil-fired storage water heaters, 27 gallon (low draw), 36 (medium draw), or 67 gallons (high draw) for electric storage 
water heaters, 100 gallon (high draw) for grid-enabled water heaters are welcome. In addition, any data for any other product classes are also welcome. 
Issue H.16 DOE also requests 
information on expected future trends 
in efficiency for consumer water heaters product classes, including the relative market shares of condensing versus non- condensing products in the market for storage water heaters and instantaneous water heaters, as well as the share of heat pump water heaters in the absence of amended efficiency standards. 
DOE intends to consider the 
possibility for potential amended standards to impact the choice between categories of water heating products or product switching (including the potential for fuel switching), both for new construction and the replacement of existing products. Because home builders are sensitive to the cost of water heating products, standards that significantly increase the purchase price of one category of product relative to other options may induce some builders to switch to a different water heating product than they would have otherwise installed (i.e., in the no-new-standards 
case). Such an amended standard level may also induce some home owners to replace their existing water heater at the end of its useful life with a different category of water heating product, or to repair the product instead of replacing, thereby delaying the replacement of the consumer water heater. 
DOE plans to develop a consumer 
choice model to estimate the response of builders and homeowners to potential 
amended consumer water heater standards. DOE plans to consider three options available to each sample 
household: (1) Replace with the same category of consumer water heater that meets a particular standard level, (2) replace with a consumer water heater using a different fuel or a different product category (e.g., switching from a 
storage gas-fired unit to an instantaneous gas-fired unit; storage gas- fired unit to storage electric unit, storage electric unit to a storage gas-fired unit), or (3) repair the existing product, thereby delaying replacement. DOE plans to have the consumer choice model use the installed cost of each option, as estimated for each sample household or building, and the operating costs, taking into account the water heating load for each household and the energy prices it will pay over the lifetime of the available product options. DOE intends to account for any additional costs to accommodate a new product or repair it. To determine which consumer choice option each sampled household or building is likely to select, DOE intends to use the estimated total installed cost and operating cost of each of the modeled choices together with decision criteria that take into account consumer willingness to pay for more- expensive but more-efficient products, as well as other factors such as income and purchase incentives. 
Issue H.17 DOE seeks any data and 
comment on its planned consumer 
choice methodology approach. 
Issue H.18 DOE seeks any data or 
comments on the consumer choice model in new construction, specifically 
identifying what the principal factors are driving the selection of different water heater categories in new construction. For example, how often are gas water heaters installed if a gas furnace is selected as the heating system in new construction? 
I. Shipments Analysis 
DOE uses shipment forecasts to 
calculate the national impacts of 
potential amended energy conservation standards on energy consumption, net present value (‘‘NPV’’) of consumer benefits, and future manufacturer cash flows. DOE shipments projections are based on available historical data broken out by product class, capacity, and efficiency. Current sales estimates allow for a more accurate model that captures recent trends in the market. In the present case, DOE intends to develop a shipments model for consumer water heaters based on 
available historical shipments data. DOE currently has historical shipments data by product class listed in Table II.9, from data sources as listed in Table II.10. In addition, DOE has limited historical data to disaggregate water heaters by capacity. Unless more recent data become available, DOE intends to use AHRI and U.S. Census shipments data to disaggregate gas-fired storage water heaters and electric storage water heaters above 55 gallons.
72 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 May 20, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM 21MYP130875 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 99 / Thursday, May 21, 2020 / Proposed Rules 
73AHRI, Residential Automatic Storage Water 
Heaters Historical Data: 1996–2018 (Available at: 
http://www.ahrinet.org/statistics.aspx ) (Last 
accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
74Appliance Magazine, Appliance Historical 
Statistical Review: 1954–2012 (2014). 
75Oil Heating Magazine, Multiple Years (1997– 
2007). 
76Data submitted as part of the April 2010 Final 
Rule. 
77ENERGY STAR, 2010–2017 Unit Shipment 
Data (Available at: https://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=partners.unit _shipment_ data) (Last 
accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
78New owners primarily consist of households or 
buildings that during a major remodel add a consumer water heater, or households or buildings that switch from a non-consumer water heater (such as a boiler). For this analysis, new owners also include households or buildings that switch between different consumer water heater product classes. 79U.S. Census Bureau, New Privately Owned 
Housing Units Started: Annual Data 1959–2018 
(Available at: http://www.census.gov/construction/nrc/historical_ data/) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 2019). 
80U.S. Census Bureau, Placements of New 
Manufactured Homes by Region and Size of Home: 1980–2018 (Available at: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/mhs.html ) (Last accessed Dec. 2, 
2019). 81Consumers can choose to extend the useful life 
of their existing broken consumer water heater 
through additional repairs instead of replacing it. TABLE II.9—H ISTORICAL SHIPMENTS BY PRODUCT CLASS 
Product class Historical shipments 
(millions) 
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 
Gas-fired Storage Water Heaters * ................................................... 3.761 3.918 3.953 3.959 4.282 4.472 4.374 4. 209 4.359 4.521 
Electric Storage Water Heaters * ...................................................... 3.752 3.737 3.739 3.734 4.008 4.277 4.027 3.938 4.127 4.230 
Oil-fired Storage Water Heaters ....................................................... No Data. 
Tabletop Water Heaters .................................................................... No Data. 
Instantaneous Gas-fired Water Heaters ** ........................................ No 
Data 0.384 0.337 0.339 0.397 0.416 0.297 0.304 0.387 No 
Data. 
Instantaneous Electric Water Heaters .............................................. No Data. 
Grid-Enabled Water Heaters ............................................................. No Data. 
* AHRI data for all storage water heaters that are marketed by the manufacturer for residential use. These data are aggregated and include grid-enabled and table-
top water heaters. 
** Data from 2010 to 2017 are ENERGY STAR unit shipment data for whole home instantaneous water heaters meeting the ENERGY STAR criteria, which may not 
reflect the entire market. If no other data source is available, DOE intends to adjust these values so that they are more representative of the entire market. 
TABLE II.10—H ISTORICAL SHIPMENTS DATASOURCES AVAILABLE BY PRODUCT CLASSES  
Product class Shipments data source 
Gas-fired Storage Water Heaters ....................... 1954 to 2018 based on AHRI data73and Appliance Magazine report.74 
Electric Storage Water Heaters. 
Oil-fired Storage Water Heaters ......................... 1997 to 2007 data from Oil Heating Magazine.75 
Tabletop Water Heaters ..................................... No data. 
Instantaneous Gas-fired Water Heaters ............. 2004 to 2007 shipments data provided by AHRI.76 
2010 to 2017 shipments data from ENERGY STAR.77 
Instantaneous Electric Water Heaters ................ No Data. 
Grid-Enabled Water Heaters .............................. No Data. 
Issue I.1 DOE seeks up-to-date 
historical shipments data for consumer 
water heaters by product class, particularly for product classes other than gas-fired and electric storage water heaters. 
The shipments model will consider 
three market segments: (1) New residential households or commercial buildings acquiring water heaters; (2) 
existing households or buildings replacing old water heaters; and (3) existing households or buildings acquiring new water heaters for the first time.
78 DOE intends to utilize U.S. Census 
Bureau data to establish historical 
housing starts for residential households,
79 80as well as National 
Energy Modeling System (‘‘NEMS’’) data published in the latest AEO to establish 
historical new construction floor space for commercial buildings. DOE intends to use the latest AEO to project housing 
starts for residential households and new construction floor space for commercial buildings. Using these sources, as well as historical product saturation data from RECS and CBECS, DOE will estimate shipments to these market segments. 
Issue I.2 DOE seeks input on the 
approach and data sources it intends to use in developing the shipments model and shipments projections for this analysis. 
To estimate the impact on consumer 
water heater shipments from product switching and repair versus replacement decisions
81that may be incentivized by 
potential standards, DOE plans to use 
the consumer choice model described in section II.G of this RFI. The options DOE plans to consider are: (1) Replace with the same category of consumer water heater that meets a particular standard level, (2) replace with a consumer water heater using a different fuel or a different category product (e.g., switching from a storage gas-fired unit to an instantaneous gas-fired unit; storage gas-fired unit to a storage electric unit, storage electric unit to a storage gas-fired unit), or (3) repair the existing product, thereby delaying the replacement. To determine whether a consumer would choose to switch products or repair rather than replacing their water heater, the shipments model will account for the combined effects of changes in purchase price and annual operating cost. Changes to the purchase price and operating costs due to amended energy conservation standards are the drivers for shipment estimates for the standards cases relative to the no-new-standards case. 
Issue I.3 DOE seeks any data sources 
and input on the approach for determining potential impacts on 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 May 20, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM 21MYP130876 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 99 / Thursday, May 21, 2020 / Proposed Rules 
82Available at: https://www.sba.gov/document/ 
support--table-size-standards. product shipments related to 
consumers’ decision on product switching and repair versus replacement. 
J. National Impact Analysis 
The purpose of the NIA is to estimate 
aggregate impacts of potential energy 
conservation standards at the national level. DOE’s analysis includes the national energy savings (‘‘NES’’) from potential standards and the NPV of the total consumer costs and savings. 
To develop the NES, DOE calculates 
and examines the difference between the annual energy consumption for the no-new-standards case and the standards cases. DOE calculates the annual energy consumption using per- unit annual energy use data multiplied by projected shipments. 
The inputs for determining the NPV 
of the total costs and benefits experienced by consumers are: (1) Total annual installed cost, (2) total annual operating costs (energy costs and repair 
and maintenance costs), and (3) a discount rate to calculate the present value of costs and savings. DOE calculates net savings each year as the difference between the no-new- standards case and each standards case in terms of total savings in operating costs versus total increases in installed costs. DOE calculates operating cost savings over the lifetime of each product shipped during the projection period. 
The NIA requires a projection of 
product energy efficiencies for the no- new-standards case and for each of the standards cases. For the no-new- standards case trend, DOE will consider whether historical data show any trend and whether any trend can be reasonably extrapolated beyond current efficiency levels. 
Issue J.1 DOE requests comment on 
the anticipated future market share of higher-efficiency products, such as condensing gas-fired water heaters and heat pump water heaters, as compared to less-efficient products, such as non- condensing gas-fired water heaters and electric water heaters, respectively, for each product class. 
For the various standards cases, to 
estimate the impact that amended energy conservation standards may have in the year compliance becomes required, DOE may use a ‘‘roll-up’’ scenario in which product efficiencies in the no-new-standards case that do not meet the new or amended standard level under consideration would ‘‘roll up’’ to meet that standard level, and shipments at efficiencies above the standard level under consideration would not be affected. After DOE establishes the efficiency distribution for the assumed compliance date of a standard, it may 
consider future projected efficiency growth using available trend data. 
Issue J.2 DOE requests comment on 
use of a ‘‘roll-up’’ scenario for the standards cases. 
When calculating energy 
consumption for water heaters at each considered efficiency level above the baseline, DOE plans to consider applying a rebound effect. A rebound effect occurs when a more-efficient product is used more intensively than its less-efficient predecessor, such that the expected energy savings from the efficiency improvement may not fully materialize. Accordingly, when a rebound effect is incorporated, calculated energy savings are lower than if no rebound effect were considered. For example, in the April 2010 Final Rule, DOE applied a rebound effect of 10 percent. 
Issue J.3 DOE seeks information 
regarding whether there is a rebound effect associated with more-efficient consumer water heaters, as would be expected to impact a potential amended energy conservation standard for those products, and if so, what that effect would be. If data indicate that there is such an effect, DOE will account for the 
rebound effect in its calculation of NES. 
K. Manufacturer Impact Analysis 
The purpose of the manufacturer 
impact analysis (‘‘MIA’’) is to estimate 
the impact of amended energy conservation standards on manufacturers of consumer water heaters. The MIA includes both quantitative and qualitative aspects. The quantitative part of the MIA primarily relies on the Government Regulatory Impact Model (‘‘GRIM’’), an industry cash-flow model adapted for each product in this analysis, with the key output of industry net present value (‘‘INPV’’) to assess the financial impacts of a standard. The qualitative part of the MIA addresses the potential impacts of energy conservation standards on manufacturing capacity and manufacturing employment as well as factors such as product characteristics, impacts on particular subgroups of firms, and important market and product trends. 
As part of the MIA, DOE intends to 
analyze impacts of amended energy conservation standards on subgroups of manufacturers of covered products, including small business manufacturers. DOE uses the Small Business Administration’s (‘‘SBA’’) small business size standards to determine whether manufacturers qualify as small businesses, which are listed by the North American Industry Classification System (‘‘NAICS’’).
82Manufacturing of 
consumer water heaters is classified under NAICS 335220, ‘‘Major Household Appliance Manufacturing,’’ and the SBA sets a threshold of 1,500 employees or less for a domestic entity to be considered as a small business. This employee threshold includes all employees in a business’s parent company and any other subsidiaries. 
One aspect of assessing manufacturer 
burden involves examining the cumulative impact of multiple DOE standards and the product-specific regulatory actions of other Federal agencies that affect the manufacturers of a covered product or equipment. While any one regulation may not impose a significant burden on manufacturers, the combined effects of several existing or impending regulations may have serious consequences for some manufacturers, groups of manufacturers, or an entire industry. Assessing the impact of a single regulation may overlook this cumulative regulatory burden. In addition to energy conservation standards, other regulations can significantly affect manufacturers’ financial operations. Multiple regulations affecting the same manufacturer can strain profits and lead companies to abandon product lines or markets with lower expected future returns than competing products. For these reasons, DOE conducts an analysis of cumulative regulatory burden as part of its rulemakings pertaining to appliance efficiency. 
Issue K.1 To the extent feasible, DOE 
seeks company names and contact information for domestic or foreign- based manufacturers that distribute consumer water heaters in commerce in the United States. 
Issue K.2 DOE identified small 
businesses as a subgroup of manufacturers that could be disproportionally impacted by amended energy conservation standards. DOE requests the names and contact information of small business manufacturers (as defined by the SBA’s size threshold) of consumer water heaters that distribute products in commerce in the United States. In addition, DOE requests comment on any other manufacturer subgroups that could be disproportionally impacted by amended energy conservation standards. DOE requests feedback on any potential approaches that could be considered to address impacts on manufacturers, including small businesses. 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 May 20, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM 21MYP130877 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 99 / Thursday, May 21, 2020 / Proposed Rules 
Issue K.3 DOE requests information 
regarding the cumulative regulatory 
burden impacts on manufacturers of consumer water heaters associated with: (1) Other DOE standards applying to different products that these manufacturers may also make and (2) product-specific regulatory actions of other Federal agencies. DOE also requests comment on its methodology for computing cumulative regulatory burden and whether there are any flexibilities it can consider that would reduce this burden while remaining consistent with the requirements of EPCA. 
L. Other Energy Conservation Standards 
Topics 
1. Market Failures 
In the field of economics, a market 
failure is a situation in which the 
market outcome does not maximize societal welfare. Such an outcome would result in unrealized potential welfare. DOE welcomes comment on any aspect of market failures, especially those in the context of amended energy conservation standards for consumer water heaters. 
2. Other 
In addition to the issues identified 
earlier in this document, DOE welcomes 
comment on any other aspect of energy conservation standards for consumer water heaters not already addressed by the specific areas identified in this document. 
III. Submission of Comments 
DOE invites all interested parties to 
submit in writing by July 6, 2020, 
comments and information on matters addressed in this notice and on other matters relevant to DOE’s consideration of amended energy conservations standards for consumer water heaters. After the close of the comment period, DOE will review the public comments received and may begin collecting data and conducting the analyses discussed in this RFI. 
Submitting comments via http://
www.regulations.gov. The http://
www.regulations.gov web page requires 
you to provide your name and contact information. Your contact information will be viewable to DOE Building Technologies staff only. Your contact information will not be publicly viewable except for your first and last names, organization name (if any), and submitter representative name (if any). If your comment is not processed properly because of technical difficulties, DOE will use this information to contact you. If DOE cannot read your comment due to 
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, DOE may not be able to consider your comment. 
However, your contact information 
will be publicly viewable if you include it in the comment or in any documents attached to your comment. Any information that you do not want to be publicly viewable should not be included in your comment, nor in any document attached to your comment. Following such instructions, persons viewing comments will see only first and last names, organization names, correspondence containing comments, and any documents submitted with the comments. 
Do not submit to http://
www.regulations.gov information for 
which disclosure is restricted by statute, such as trade secrets and commercial or financial information (hereinafter referred to as Confidential Business Information (‘‘CBI’’)). Comments submitted through http://www.regulations.gov cannot be claimed 
as CBI. Comments received through the website will waive any CBI claims for the information submitted. For information on submitting CBI, see the Confidential Business Information section. 
DOE processes submissions made 
through http://www.regulations.gov 
before posting. Normally, comments will be posted within a few days of being submitted. However, if large volumes of comments are being processed simultaneously, your comment may not be viewable for up to several weeks. Please keep the comment tracking number that http://www.regulations.gov provides after you 
have successfully uploaded your 
comment. 
Submitting comments via email, hand 
delivery/courier, or postal mail. Comments and documents submitted via email, hand delivery/courier, or postal mail also will be posted to http:// 
www.regulations.gov. If you do not want 
your personal contact information to be publicly viewable, do not include it in your comment or any accompanying documents. Instead, provide your contact information in a cover letter. Include your first and last names, email address, telephone number, and optional mailing address. The cover letter will not be publicly viewable as long as it does not include any comments. 
Include contact information each time 
you submit comments, data, documents, and other information to DOE. If you submit via postal mail or hand delivery/ courier, please provide all items on a CD, if feasible. It is not necessary to submit printed copies. No telefacsimilies (faxes) will be accepted. 
Comments, data, and other 
information submitted to DOE electronically should be provided in PDF (preferred), Microsoft Word or Excel, WordPerfect, or text (ASCII) file format. Provide documents that are not secured, written in English, and free of any defects or viruses. Documents should not contain special characters or any form of encryption and, if possible, they should carry the electronic signature of the author. 
Campaign form letters. Please submit 
campaign form letters by the originating organization in batches of between 50 to 500 form letters per PDF or as one form letter with a list of supporters’ names compiled into one or more PDFs. This reduces comment processing and posting time. 
Confidential Business Information. 
Pursuant to 10 CFR 1004.11, any person submitting information that he or she believes to be confidential and exempt by law from public disclosure should submit via email, postal mail, or hand delivery/courier two well-marked copies: One copy of the document marked ‘‘confidential’’ including all the information believed to be confidential, and one copy of the document marked ‘‘non-confidential’’ with the information believed to be confidential deleted. Submit these documents via email to ConsumerWaterHeaters2017STD0019@ee.doe.gov or on a CD, if feasible. DOE 
will make its own determination about the confidential status of the information and treat it according to its determination. 
It is DOE’s policy that all comments 
may be included in the public docket, without change and as received, including any personal information provided in the comments (except information deemed to be exempt from public disclosure). 
DOE considers public participation to 
be a very important part of the process for developing energy conservation standards. DOE actively encourages the participation and interaction of the public during the comment period in each stage of this process. Interactions with and between members of the public provide a balanced discussion of the issues and assist DOE in the process. Anyone who wishes to be added to the DOE mailing list to receive future notices and information about this process should contact Appliance and Equipment Standards Program staff at (202) 287–1445 or via email at ApplianceStandardsQuestions@ee.doe.gov. 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 May 20, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM 21MYP130878 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 99 / Thursday, May 21, 2020 / Proposed Rules 
1All references to EPCA in this document refer 
to the statute as amended through America’s Water 
Infrastructure Act of 2018, Public Law 115–270 (October 23, 2018). Signing Authority 
This document of the Department of 
Energy was signed on February 25, 
2020, by Alexander N. Fitzsimmons, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and 
Renewable Energy, pursuant to delegated authority from the Secretary of Energy. That document with the original signature and date is maintained by DOE. For administrative purposes only, and in compliance with requirements of the Office of the Federal Register, the undersigned DOE Federal Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to sign and submit the document in electronic format for publication, as an official document of the Department of Energy. This administrative process in no way alters the legal effect of this document upon publication in the Federal Register. 
Signed in Washington, DC, on May 13, 
2020. 
Treena V. Garrett, Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. 
Department of Energy. 
[FR Doc. 2020–10564 Filed 5–20–20; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P 
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 
10 CFR Part 431 
[EERE–2020–BT–STD–0007] 
RIN 1904–AE63 
Energy Conservation Program: Energy 
Conservation Standards for Electric Motors 
AGENCY : Office of Energy Efficiency and 
Renewable Energy, Department of Energy. 
ACTION : Request for information. 
SUMMARY : The U.S. Department of 
Energy (‘‘DOE’’) is initiating an effort to determine whether to amend the current energy conservation standards for electric motors. DOE must review these standards at least once every six years and either propose new standards for electric motors or a notice of determination that the existing standards do not need amending. DOE is soliciting information from the public to help determine whether amending the current electric motor standards would produce significant energy savings while being technologically feasible and cost effective. Accordingly, DOE seeks information regarding any technological or market changes since the most recent standards update that would justify a new rulemaking to increase the stringency of the current standards consistent with these factors. DOE welcomes written comments from the public on any subject within the scope of this document (including those topics not specifically raised), as well as the submission of data and other relevant information. 
DATES : Written comments and 
information will be accepted on or before June 22, 2020. 
ADDRESSES : Interested persons are 
encouraged to submit comments using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments. Alternatively, interested persons may submit comments, identified by docket number EERE–2020–BT–STD–0007, by any of the following methods: 
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 
www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments. 
2. Email: ElecMotors2020STD0007@
ee.doe.gov Include the docket number 
EERE–2020–BT–STD–0007 in the subject line of the message. 
3. Postal Mail: Appliance and 
Equipment Standards Program, U.S. Department of Energy, Building Technologies Office, Mailstop EE–5B, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585–0121. Telephone: (202) 287–1445. If possible, please submit all items on a compact disc (‘‘CD’’), in which case it is not necessary to include printed copies. 
4. Hand Delivery/Courier: Appliance 
and Equipment Standards Program, U.S. Department of Energy, Building Technologies Office, 950 L’Enfant Plaza SW, 6th Floor, Washington, DC 20024. Telephone: (202) 287–1445. If possible, please submit all items on a CD, in which case it is not necessary to include printed copies. 
No telefacsimilies (‘‘faxes’’) will be 
accepted. For detailed instructions on submitting comments and additional information on this process, see section III of this document. 
Docket: The docket for this activity, 
which includes Federal Register notices, comments, and other supporting documents/materials, is available for review at http://www.regulations.gov. All documents in 
the docket are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index. However, 
some documents listed in the index, such as those containing information that is exempt from public disclosure, may not be publicly available. 
The docket web page can be found at 
http://www.regulations.gov/ #!docketDetail;D=EERE-2020-BT-STD- 0007. The docket web page contains 
instructions on how to access all documents, including public comments, in the docket. See section III for information on how to submit comments through http://www.regulations.gov. 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : 
Jeremy Dommu, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies Office, EE–5B, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585–0121. Telephone: (202) 586– 9870. Email: ApplianceStandardsQuestions@ee.doe.gov. 
Michael Kido, U.S. Department of 
Energy, Office of the General Counsel, GC–33, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585–0121. Telephone: (202) 586–8145. Email: Michael.Kido@hq.doe.gov. 
For further information on how to 
submit a comment or review other public comments and the docket contact the Appliance and Equipment Standards Program staff at (202) 287– 1445 or by email: ApplianceStandardsQuestions@ee.doe.gov. 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : 
Table of Contents 
I. Introduction 
A. Authority and Background 
B. Rulemaking Process 
II. Request for Information and Comments 
A. Equipment Covered by This Process B. Market and Technology Assessment 1. Equipment Class Groups and Equipment 
Classes 
2. Technology Assessment C. Screening Analysis D. Engineering Analysis 1. Baseline Efficiency Levels 2. Maximum Available and Maximum 
Technologically Feasible Levels 
3. Manufacturer Production Costs and 
Manufacturing Selling Price 
E. Distribution Channels 
F. Energy Use Analysis G. Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period 
Analysis 
H. Shipments I. Manufacturer Impact Analysis J. Other Energy Conservation Standards 
Topics 
1. Market Failures 2. Emerging Smart Technology Market 3. Other Issues 
III. Submission of Comments 
I. Introduction 
A. Authority and Background 
The Energy Policy and Conservation 
Act, as amended (‘‘EPCA’’),1among 
other things, authorizes DOE to regulate 
the energy efficiency of a number of consumer products and certain 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 May 20, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM 21MYP1