WORLD TRADE
ORGANIZATIONWT/MIN(01)/17
20 November 2001
(01-5858)
MINISTERIAL CONFERENCE
Fourth Session
Doha, 9 - 14 November 2001
IMPLEMENTATION-RELATED ISSUES AND CONCERNS
Decision of 14 November 2001
The Ministerial Conference,
Having regard to  Articles IV.1, IV.5 and IX of the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the
World Trade Organization (WTO);
Mindful  of the importance that Members attach to the increased participation of developing
countries in the multilateral trading system, and of the need to ensure that the system responds fully to
the needs and interests of all participants;
Determined to take concrete action to address issues and concerns that have been raised by
many developing-country Members regarding the implementation of some WTO Agreements and
Decisions, including the difficulties and resource constraints that have been encountered in the
implementation of obligations in various areas;
Recalling  the 3 May 2000 Decision of the General Council to meet in special sessions to
address outstanding implementation issues, and to assess the existing difficulties, identify waysneeded to resolve them, and take decisions for appropriate action not later than the Fourth Session of
the Ministerial Conference;
Noting the actions taken by the General Council in pursuance of this mandate at its Special
Sessions in October and December 2000 (WT/L/384), as well as the review and further discussionundertaken at the Special Sessions held in April, July and October 2001, including the referral of
additional issues to relevant WTO bodies or their chairpersons for further work;
Noting also the reports on the issues referred to the General Council from subsidiary bodies
and their chairpersons and from the Director-General, and the discussions as well as the clarificationsprovided and understandings reached on implementation issues in the intensive informal and formal
meetings held under this process since May 2000;
Decides  as follows:
 1. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (GATT 1994)
1.1 Reaffirms that Article XVIII of the GATT 1994 is a special and differential treatment
provision for developing countries and that recourse to it should be less onerous than
to Article XII of the GATT 1994.WT/MIN(01)/17
Page 2
1.2 Noting the issues raised in the report of the Chairperson of the Committee on Market
Access (WT/GC/50) concerning the meaning to be given to the phrase "substantial
interest" in paragraph 2(d) of Article XIII of the GATT 1994, the Market Access
Committee is directed to give further consideration to the issue and make
recommendations to the General Council as expeditiously as possible but in any eventnot later than the end of 2002.
2. Agreement on Agriculture
2.1 Urges Members to exercise restraint in challenging measures notified under the green
box by developing countries to promote rural development and adequately addressfood security concerns.
2.2 Takes note of the report of the Committee on Agriculture (G/AG/11) regarding the
implementation of the Decision on Measures Concerning the Possible Negative
Effects of the Reform Programme on Least-Developed and Net Food-ImportingDeveloping Countries, and approves the recommendations contained therein
regarding (i) food aid; (ii) technical and financial assistance in the context of aid
programmes to improve agricultural productivity and infrastructure; (iii) financing
normal levels of commercial imports of basic foodstuffs; and (iv) review of follow-
up.
2.3 Takes note of the report of the Committee on Agriculture (G/AG/11) regarding the
implementation of Article 10.2 of the Agreement on Agriculture, and approves the
recommendations and reporting requirements contained therein.
2.4 Takes note of the report of the Committee on Agriculture (G/AG/11) regarding the
administration of tariff rate quotas and the submission by Members of addenda to
their notifications, and endorses the decision by the Committee to keep this matter
under review.
3. Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures 
3.1 Where the appropriate level of sanitary and phytosanitary protection allows scope for
the phased introduction of new sanitary and phytosanitary measures, the phrase
"longer time-frame for compliance" referred to in Article 10.2 of the Agreement on
the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, shall be understood to meannormally a period of not less than 6 months.  Where the appropriate level of sanitary
and phytosanitary protection does not allow scope for the phased introduction of a
new measure, but specific problems are identified by a Member, the Member
applying the measure shall upon request enter into consultations with the country
with a view to finding a mutually satisfactory solution to the problem whilecontinuing to achieve the importing Member's appropriate level of protection.
3.2 Subject to the conditions specified in paragraph 2 of Annex B to the Agreement on
the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, the phrase "reasonable
interval" shall be understood to mean normally a period of not less than 6 months.  Itis understood that timeframes for specific measures have to be considered in the
context of the particular circumstances of the measure and actions necessary to
implement it.  The entry into force of meas ures which contribute to the liberalization
of trade should not be unnecessarily delayed.WT/MIN(01)/17
Page 3
3.3 Takes note of the Decision of the Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures
(G/SPS/19)  regarding equivalence, and instructs the Committee to develop
expeditiously the specific programme to further the implementation of Article 4 of
the Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures.
3.4 Pursuant to the provisions of Article 12.7 of the Agreement on the Application of
Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, the Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary
Measures is instructed to review the operation and implementation of the Agreement
on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures at least once every four years.
3.5 (i) Takes note of the actions taken to date by the Director-General to facilitate the
increased participation of Members at different levels of development in the work ofthe relevant international standard setting organizations as well as his efforts to
coordinate with these organizations and financial institutions in identifying SPS-
related technical assistance needs and how best to address them; and
(ii) urges the Director-General to continue his cooperative efforts with these
organizations and institutions in this regard, including with a view to according
priority to the effective participation of least-developed countries and facilitating the
provision of technical and financial assistance for this purpose.
3.6 (i) Urges Members to provide, to the extent possible, the financial and technical
assistance necessary to enable least-developed countries to respond adequately to the
introduction of any new SPS measures which may have significant negative effects
on their trade; and
(ii) urges Members to ensure that technical assistance is provided to least-developed
countries with a view to responding to the special problems faced by them in
implementing the Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary
Measures.
4. Agreement on Textiles and Clothing
Reaffirms the commitment to full and faithful  implementation of the Agreement on Textiles
and Clothing, and agrees:
4.1 that the provisions of the Agreement relating to the early integration of products and
the elimination of quota restrictions should be effectively utilised.
4.2 that Members will exercise particular consideration before initiating investigations in
the context of antidumping  remedies on te xtile and clothing exports from developing
countries previously subject to quantitative restrictions under the Agreement for a
period of two years following full integration of this Agreement into the WTO.
4.3 that without prejudice to their rights and obligations, Members shall notify any
changes in their rules of origin concerning products falling under the coverage of the
Agreement to the Committee on Rules of Origin which may decide to examine them.
Requests the Council for Trade in Goods to examine the following proposals:
4.4 that when calculating the quota levels for small suppliers for the remaining years of
the Agreement, Members will apply the most favourable methodology available in
respect of those Members under the growth -on-growth provisions from the beginningWT/MIN(01)/17
Page 4
of the implementation period; extend the same treatment to least-developed countries;
and, where possible, eliminate quota restrictions on imports of such Members;
4.5 that Members will calculate the quota levels for the remaining years of the Agreement
with respect to other restrained Members as if implementation of the growth-on-growth provision for stage 3 had been advanced to 1 January 2000;
and make recommendations to the General Council by 31 July 2002 for appropriate action.
5. Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade
5.1 Confirms the approach to technical assistance being developed by the Committee on
Technical Barriers to Trade, reflecting the results of the triennial review work in this
area, and mandates this work to continue.
5.2 Subject to the conditions specified in paragraph 12 of Article 2 of the Agreement on
Technical Barriers to Trade, the phrase "reasonable interval" shall be understood to
mean normally a period of not less than 6 months, except when this would be
ineffective in fulfilling the legitimate objectives pursued.
5.3 (i) Takes note of the actions taken to date by the Director-General to facilitate the
increased participation of Members at different levels of development in the work of
the relevant international standard setting organizations as well as his efforts to
coordinate with these organizations and financial institutions in identifying TBT-
related technical assistance needs and how best to address them; and
(ii) urges the Director-General to continue his cooperative efforts with these
organizations and institutions, including w ith a view to according priority to the
effective participation of least-developed countries and facilitating the provision of
technical and financial assistance for this purpose.
5.4 (i) Urges Members to provide, to the extent possible, the financial and technical
assistance necessary to enable least-developed countries to respond adequately to theintroduction of any new TBT measures which may have significant negative effects
on their trade; and
(ii) urges Members to ensure that technica l assistance is provided to least-developed
countries with a view to responding to the special problems faced by them inimplementing the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade.
6. Agreement on Trade-Related Investment Measures
6.1 Takes note of the actions taken by the Council for Trade in Goods in regard to
requests from some developing-country Members for the extension of the five-year
transitional period provided for in Article 5.2 of Agreement on Trade-Related
Investment Measures.
6.2 Urges the Council for Trade in Goods to consider positively requests that may be
made by least-developed countries under Article 5.3 of the TRIMs Agreement or
Article IX.3 of the WTO Agreement, as well as to take into consideration the
particular circumstances of least-developed countries when setting the terms and
conditions including time-frames.WT/MIN(01)/17
Page 5
7. Agreement on the Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and
Trade 1994
7.1 Agrees that investigating authorities shal l examine with special care any application
for the initiation of an anti-dumping investigation where an investigation of the same
product from the same Member resulted in a negative finding within the 365 days
prior to the filing of the application and that, unless this pre-initiation examination
indicates that circumstances have changed, the investigation shall not proceed.
7.2 Recognizes that, while Article 15 of the Agreement on the Implementation of
Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 is a mandatory
provision, the modalities for its application would benefit from clarification.
Accordingly, the Committee on Anti-Dumping Practices is instructed, through its
working group on Implementation, to examine this issue and to draw up appropriate
recommendations within twelve months on how to operationalize this provision.
7.3 Takes note that Article 5.8 of the Agreement on the Implementation of Article VI of
the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 does not specify the time-frame to
be used in determining the volume of dumped imports, and that this lack of
specificity creates uncertainties in the implementation of the provision. TheCommittee on Anti-Dumping Practices is instructed, through its working group on
Implementation, to study this issue and draw up recommendations within 12 months,
with a view to ensuring the maximum possible predictability and objectivity in the
application of time frames.
7.4 Takes note that Article 18.6 of the Agreement on the Implementation of Article VI of
the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 requires the Committee on Anti-
Dumping Practices to review annually the implementation and operation of the
Agreement taking into account the objectives thereof.  The Committee on Anti-
dumping Practices is instructed to draw up guidelines for the improvement of annual
reviews and to report its views and recommendations to the General Council for
subsequent decision within 12 months.
8. Agreement on the Implementation of Article VII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and
Trade 1994
8.1 Takes note of the actions taken by the Committee on Customs Valuation in regard to
the requests from a number of developing-country Members for the extension of the
five-year transitional period provided for in Article 20.1 of Agreement on the
Implementation of Article VII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994.
8.2 Urges the Council for Trade in Goods to give positive consideration to requests that
may be made by least-developed country Members under paragraphs 1 and 2 of
Annex III of the Customs Valuation Agreement or under Article IX.3 of the WTO
Agreement, as well as to take into consideration the particular circumstances of least-
developed countries when setting the terms and conditions including time-frames.
8.3 Underlines the importance of strengthening cooperation between the customs
administrations of Members in the prevention of customs fraud.  In this regard, it is
agreed that, further to the 1994 Ministerial Decision Regarding Cases Where
Customs Administrations Have Reasons to  Doubt the Truth or Accuracy of theWT/MIN(01)/17
Page 6
Declared Value, when the customs administration of an importing Member has
reasonable grounds to doubt the truth or accuracy of the declared value, it may seek
assistance from the customs administration of an exporting Member on the value of
the good concerned.  In such cases, the exporting Member shall offer cooperation and
assistance, consistent with its domestic laws and procedures, including furnishinginformation on the export value of the good  concerned.  Any information provided in
this context shall be treated in accordance with Article 10 of the Customs Valuation
Agreement.  Furthermore, recognizing the legitimate concerns expressed by the
customs administrations of several importing Members on the accuracy of the
declared value, the Committee on Customs Valuation is directed to identify and
assess practical means to address such concerns, including the exchange of
information on export values and to report to the General Council by the end of 2002at the latest.
 9. Agreement on Rules of Origin
9.1 Takes note of the report of the Committee on Rules of Origin (G/RO/48) regarding
progress on the harmonization work programme, and urges the Committee to
complete its work by the end of 2001.
9.2 Agrees that any interim arrangements on rules of origin implemented by Members in
the transitional period before the entry into force of the results of the harmonisation
work programme shall be consistent with the Agreement on Rules of Origin,
particularly Articles 2 and 5 thereof.  Without prejudice to Members' rights and
obligations, such arrangements may be examined by the Committee on Rules of
Origin.
10. Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures
10.1 Agrees that Annex VII(b) to the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing
Measures includes the Members that are listed therein until their GNP per capita
reaches US $1,000 in constant 1990 dollars for three consecutive years.  This decisionwill enter into effect upon the adoption by the Committee on Subsidies and
Countervailing Measures of an appropriate methodology for calculating constant
1990 dollars.  If, however, the Committee on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures
does not reach a consensus agreement on an appropriate methodology by 1 January
2003, the methodology proposed by the Chairman of the Committee set forth inG/SCM/38, Appendix 2 shall be applied. A Member shall not leave Annex VII(b) so
long as its GNP per capita in current dollars has not reached US $1000 based upon
the most recent data from the World Bank.
10.2 Takes note of the proposal to treat measures implemented by developing countries
with a view to achieving legitimate development goals, such as regional growth,
technology research and development funding, production diversification and
development and implementation of envir onmentally sound methods of production as
non-actionable subsidies, and agrees that this issue be addressed in accordance with
paragraph 13 below. During the course of the negotiations, Members are urged toexercise due restraint with respect to challenging such measures.
10.3 Agrees that the Committee on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures shall continue
its review of the provisions of the Agreement on Subsidies and CountervailingWT/MIN(01)/17
Page 7
Measures regarding countervailing duty investigations and report to the General
Council by 31 July 2002.
10.4 Agrees that if a Member has been excluded from the list in paragraph (b) of
Annex VII to the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, it shall bere-included in it when its GNP per capita falls back below US$ 1,000.
10.5 Subject to the provisions of Articles 27.5 and 27.6, it is reaffirmed that least-
developed country Members are exempt from the prohibition on export subsidies set
forth in Article 3.1(a) of the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures,
and thus have flexibility to finance their exporters, consistent with their development
needs.  It is understood that the eight-year period in Article 27.5 within which a least-developed country Member must phase out its export subsidies in respect of a product
in which it is export-competitive begins from the date export competitiveness exists
within the meaning of Article 27.6.
10.6 Having regard to the particular situation of certain developing-country Members,
directs the Committee on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures to extend the
transition period, under the rubric of Article 27.4 of the Agreement on Subsidies and
Countervailing Measures, for certain export subsidies provided by such Members,
pursuant to the procedures set forth in document G/SCM/39.  Furthermore, when
considering a request for an extension of the transition period under the rubric ofArticle 27.4 of the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, and in
order to avoid that Members at similar stages of development and having a similar
order of magnitude of share in world trade are treated differently in terms of receiving
such extensions for the same eligible programmes and the length of such extensions,
directs the Committee to extend the transition period for those developing countries,after taking into account the relative competitiveness in relation to other developing-
country Members who have requested extension of the transition period following the
procedures set forth in document G/SCM/39.
11. Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS)
11.1 The TRIPS Council is directed to continue its examination of the scope and
modalities for complaints of the types provided for under subparagraphs 1(b) and 1(c)
of Article XXIII of GATT 1994 and make recommendations to the Fifth Session of
the Ministerial Conference.  It is agreed that, in the meantime, Members will not
initiate such complaints under the TRIPS Agreement.
11.2 Reaffirming that the provisions of Article 66.2 of the TRIPS Agreement are
mandatory, it is agreed that the TRIPS Council shall put in place a mechanism for
ensuring the monitoring and full implementation of the obligations in question.  To
this end, developed-country Members shall submit prior to the end of 2002 detailed
reports on the functioning in practice of the incentives provided to their enterprisesfor the transfer of technology in pursuance of their commitments under Article 66.2.
These submissions shall be subject to a re view in the TRIPS Council and information
shall be updated by Members annually.WT/MIN(01)/17
Page 8
12. Cross-cutting Issues
12.1 The Committee on Trade and Development is instructed:
(i) to identify those special and differential treatment provisions that are already
mandatory in nature and those that are non-bi nding in character, to consider the legal
and practical implications for developed and developing Members of converting
special and differential treatment measures into mandatory provisions, to identify
those that Members consider should be made mandatory, and to report to the General
Council with clear recommendations  for a decision by July 2002;
(ii) to examine additional ways in which special and differential treatment provisions can
be made more effective, to consider ways, including improved information flows, inwhich developing countries, in particular the least-developed countries, may be
assisted to make best use of special and differential treatment provisions, and to
report to the General Council with clear recommendations for a decision by
July 2002;  and
(iii) to consider, in the context of the work programme adopted at the Fourth Session of
the Ministerial Conference, how special and differential treatment may be
incorporated into the architecture of WTO rules.
The work of the Committee on Trade and Development in this regard shall take fully
into consideration previous work undertaken as noted in WT/COMTD/W/77/Rev.1.  It will
also be without prejudice to work in respect of implementation of WTO Agreements in theGeneral Council and in other Councils and Committees.
12.2 Reaffirms that preferences granted to developing countries pursuant to the Decision
of the Contracting Parties of 28 November 1979 ("Enabling Clause")
1 should be
generalised, non-reciprocal and non-discriminatory.
13. Outstanding Implementation Issues2
Agrees that outstanding implementation issues be addressed in accordance with paragraph 12
of the Ministerial Declaration (WT/MIN(01)/DEC/1).
14. Final Provisions
Requests the Director-General, consistent with paragraphs 38 to 43 of the Ministerial
Declaration (WT/MIN(01)/DEC/1), to ensure that WTO technical assistance focuses, on a priority
basis, on assisting developing countries to implement existing WTO obligations as well as on
increasing their capacity to participate more effectiv ely in future multilateral trade negotiations.  In
carrying out this mandate, the WTO Secretariat should cooperate more closely with international and
regional intergovernmental organisations so as to increase efficiency and synergies and avoid
duplication of programmes.
__________
                                                     
1 BISD 26S/203.
2A list of these issues is compiled in document Job(01)/152/Rev.1.