RESTRICTEDWORLD TRADE
ORGANIZATIONTN/CTD/W/12/Rev.1
22 July 2002
(02-4041)
Committee on Trade and Development
Special Session
DRAFT REPORT TO THE GENERAL COUNCIL1
Revision
I. INTRODUCTION
1. Paragraph 44 of the Doha Ministerial Declaration reaffirmed that "provisions for special and
differential treatment are an integral part of the WTO Agreements" and directed that "all special and
differential treatment provisions shall be reviewed with a view to strengthening them and making
them more precise, effective and operational."  Ministers also endorsed the Work Programme on
special and differential treatment set out in the Decision on Implementation-Related Issues and
Concerns, and as per paragraph 12.1 of the Decision directed the  Committee on Trade and
Development (CTD):
(i) "to identify those special and differential treatment provisions that are already
mandatory in nature and those that are non-binding in character, to consider
the legal and practical implications for developed and developing Members
of converting special and differential treatment measures into mandatory
provisions, to identify those that Members consider should be made
mandatory, and to report to the General Council with clear recommendationsfor a decision by July 2002;
(ii) to examine additional ways in which special and differential treatment
provisions can be made more effective, to consider ways, including improved
information flows, in which developing countries, in particular the least-
developed countries, may be assisted to make best use of special anddifferential treatment provisions, and to report to the General Council with
clear recommendations for a decision by July 2002; and
(iii) to consider, in the context of the Work Programme adopted at the Fourth
Session of the Ministerial Conference, how special and differential treatment
may be incorporated into the architecture of WTO rules."
2. In pursuance of this mandate the Trade Negotiations Committee (TNC) in its meeting held on
28 January - 1 February 2002, agreed that "….the review of all special and differential treatment
provisions with a view to strengthening them and making them more precise, effective and
operational provided for in paragraph 44 of the Ministerial Declaration shall be carried out by the
Committee on Trade and Development in Special Sessions."
                                                     
1 This report is not intended to be an exhaustive compilation of all the issues that have been raised.
Neither does it prejudge Members' position on those issues.TN/CTD/W/12/Rev.1
Page 2
3. Accordingly the Special Session of the CTD was established and Ambassador Ransford
Smith of Jamaica elected its Chairman.  The First meeting of the Special Session was held on
5 March 2002 and five more formal meetings and a number of informal meetings have been held
thereafter.  A number of submissions  have been tabled, and these are indicated at Annex I.
II. CROSS-CUTTING ISSUES
4. A number of systemic and institutional cross-cutting issues were raised both in submissions
from Members, as well as in the discussion on those submissions.  These included issues relating to
the principles and objectives of special amd differ ential treatment, including the utility of a clearer
definition and understanding on these principles in assessing the effectiveness of special and
differential treatment provisions; a single or multi-tiered structure of rights and obligations;
coherence; bench marking; technical assistance and capacity building; transition periods; trade
preferences; utilisation; and universal or differentiated treatment, including graduation .  A listing of
these issues together with references to relevant written submissions is contained in Annex II.  While
there was discussion on most of these issues, some  Members considered that these were important
and, in some cases , fundamental issues, which would need to be looked at and examined in greater
depth.
5. In addition the Special Session also had an exchange of views on the submission by Paraguay
on the Enabling Clause, and a number of systemic issues which arose therefrom.  The submission
proposed that preferential treatment, except to least-developed countries (LDCs), should be provided
on a universal and non-discriminatory basis and expressed concern that non-compliance with the
Enabling Clause, including through waivers, gave rise to discriminatory treatment. On the other hand,
a number of countries expressed a view that certain Members had particular needs and vulnerabilitiesthat required preferential treatment and that the WTO Rules provided recourse to non-universal
treatment, including through waivers.  These Members expressed the view that there needed to be
flexibility so as to be able to address effectively the constraints and circumstances of different
developing countries.  However, other Members underscored their view that special and differential
treatment should not be provided in a manner that was prejudicial to the interests of any developingcountry.  As a result of the initial submission and discussions, additional written submissions were
made by the proponent and another Member.
6. A number of cross-cutting institutional issues were also raised.  Some preliminary discussion
was held on these , including on (i) a Monitoring Mechanism;  (ii) an Annual Special Session of the
General Council on LDCs participation;  (iii) a Facility under the Doha Development Agenda Trust
Fund; and (iv) proposals on technical assistance and training.
7. The proposal for the establishment of a Monitoring Mechanism was made by the African
Group.  In the Group’s view, among the main functions of the Mechanism would be (i) the regular
evaluation of the utilization and effectiveness of the special and differential treatment provisions, with
a view to ensuring that the provisions are duly utilized and any problems arising effectively
addressed, and (ii) provision of a framework for in itiating and considering recommendations that the
CTD could make to Members on complying with obligations under special and differential treatmentprovisions, as well as best practice for utilization of the provisions.  There was wide support for the
concept, although it was clear that further discussions would be required on the functioning and
structure of such a mechanism.
8. The proposal for an Annual Special Session of the General Council on the participation of the
LDCs in the multilateral trading system  was made by the LDCs Group.  They proposed that theagenda of such an annual session could encompass (i) the implementation of the Decision on
Measures in Favour of Least-Developed Countries and its overall objectives in favour of LDCs;  (ii)
the review of the implementation of the specific special and differential provisions included in theTN/CTD/W/12/Rev.1
Page 3
WTO Agreements, Decisions and Declarations;  and (iii) overall review of special and differential
treatment.  Some Members were of the view that should a monitoring mechanism be established its
role and functions could encompass those sought through the proposed holding of an annual special
session, although it was emphasized that this would have to be without dilution of the concerns of the
LDCs.  Others suggested that the various proposals and their role and functions would need to beassessed in the context of existing machinery such as the Sub-Committee on the Least-Developed
Countries and the Integrated Framework.
9. Finally, the African Group proposed the establishment of a Facility under the Doha
Development Agenda Trust Fund to ensure that the financial underpinning/backing necessary for the
effective utilisation of special and differential treatment provisions under the various Agreements, and
that would be a permanent financial arrangement for special and differential treatment provisions.
There was an initial consideration of this issue but it was generally felt that an in-depth examination,
with a view to making clear recommendations, w ould require additional time.  The African Group had
also in Annexes to its submission outlined criteria for technical and financial assistance and training.
It was proposed that these should be given further consideration in the context of the development of
Technical Assistance Plans.
III. AGREEMENT-SPECIFIC PROPOSALS AND ISSUES
10. A number of proposals were submitted on specific provisions of the Agreements,
Understandings and Decisions, in the context of the mandate of the Doha Ministerial Declaration and
the Decision on Implementation-Related Issues and Concerns, which had instructed Members to
identify inter alia  non-mandatory provisions which Members considered should be made mandatory;
the legal and practical implications for developed and developing Members of doing so; as well as toexamine additional ways in which special and differ ential treatment provisions could be made more
effective.  A synoptic table indicating the proposals made on specific provisions under the various
Agreements is at Annex III.
11. These proposals were introduced and certain clarifications provided during the discussions.  A
number of Members cited the large number of Agreement-specific proposals (approximately eighty),what they viewed as the complexity and potentia l implications of some of the proposals, and a
shortage of time, as factors that prevented them from  being able to engage in more than a preliminary
consideration of many of the proposals.  Some Members indicated that the proposals were still being
considered by their authorities in capitals.  Another consideration raised by some Members was their
view that a discussion of some  cross-cutting and systemic issues was necessary in order to facilitate
their consideration of the Agreement-specific proposals.  Yet another issue raised was the need to
ensure complementarity and coordination between the work of the Special Session and the work ofother bodies, both those which were usually attended by experts in technical areas as well as other
bodies undertaking negotiations in areas on which proposals were also before the Special Session.
12. A large number of delegations expressed concern that, in their view, insufficient progress had
been made in considering and taking decisions, as mandated, on the Agreement-specific proposals.
Their view was that progress could have been made on at least some of these proposals and that theAgreement-specific proposals should be resolved before addressing cross-cutting issues.  Others,
citing the factors outlined earlier, were of the view that more time and further discussions were
required.
13. Further detailed and intensive work is required to be carried out in this regard.TN/CTD/W/12/Rev.1
Page 4
IV. THE WAY FORWARD
14. The Ministers mandated the CTD to make "clear recommendations" to the General Council
for a decision, by July 2002.  A large number of issues have been raised, both in the written
submissions and the ensuing discussions, and while some recommendations can be made, a significant
amount of work remains to be done before Members can agree on clear recommendations in a numberof areas, in accordance with the Ministerial mandate.  It is recommended that the General Council
instruct the Special Session of the CTD to proceed expeditiously to fulfil its mandate, as contained in
paragraph 44 of the Doha Ministerial Declaration and paragraph 12 of the Decision on
Implementation-Related Issues and Concerns, and complete its work so as to be able  to report back to
the General Council with clear recommendations for a decision by [31 December 2002]
[31 March 2003].
15. It is recommended that the Special Session of th e CTD be instructed to continue, within the
parameters of its mandate, the analysis and examination of the various Agreement-specific proposals
and issues that have been raised in the written submissions and the discussions, and to do so:
(a) on the basis of a possible ordering of these proposals for consideration in appropriate
clusters;
(b) utilising, as appropriate, the expertise available in other WTO bodies and negotiating
groups, and facilitating this through requesting and receiving reports from these
bodies, and  where  feasible, through the holding of back-to-back meetings of the
Special Session with the meetings of these bodies and groups.
Members should provide detailed responses to the various Agreement-specific proposals by
31 October 2002.
16. It is recommended further that the Special Session of the CTD be instructed to continue, at the
same time, within the parameters of its mandate, the analysis and examination of the various cross-
cutting issues and proposals that have been raised in the written submissions and the discussions.
17. The Special Session of the CTD recommends also that the General Council agree to establish
a Monitoring Mechanism for special and differential treatment, and instruct it to elaborate for the
Council's consideration and approval the functions and structure of such a Mechanism, taking into
account the proposals made by the African Group and the discussions that have taken place thereon.
18. It is recommended that the General Council  also instruct the Special Session of the CTD
(i) to continue the examination of other proposals on institutional arrangements made by the African
and LDCs Group, and (ii) to submit the proposals on criteria for technical and financial assistance and
training, referred to in paragraph 9 above, to the CTD in Regular Session, for examination  with a view
to the inclusion of any agreed elements in future Technical Assistance Plans.
19. The General Council further instructs the Special Session of the CTD to consider also how
special and differential treatment may be incor porated into the architecture of WTO rules, in
accordance with Paragraph 12.1(iii) of the Ministerial Decision on Implementation-Related Issues and
Concerns.TN/CTD/W/12/Rev.1
Page 5
ANNEX I
Submissions received in the Special Session of the Committee on Trade and Development
April – July 2002
• TN/CTD/W/1 from Cuba, Dominican Republic, Hon duras, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Pakistan, Sri
Lanka, Tanzania & Zimbabwe
• TN/CTD/W/2 from  Cuba, Dominican Republic, Egypt, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Kenya,
Mauritius, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Tanzania & Zimbabwe
• TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1, TN/CTD/W /3/Rev.2 and TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1/Add.1 from the African
Group
• TN/CTD/W/4 and TN/CTD/W/4/Add.1 from the LDCs
• TN/CTD/W/5,  TN/CTD/W/5/Add.1 and TN/CTD/W/5/Add.2 from Paraguay
• TN/CTD/W/6 from India
• TN/CTD/W/7 from Thailand
• TN/CTD/W/8 from St. Lucia
• TN/CTD/W/9 from the United States
• TN/CTD/W/10 from Hungary
• TN/CTD/W/11 from Japan.TN/CTD/W/12/Rev.1
Page 6
ANNEX II
TABLE ON SYSTEMIC CROSS-CUTTING ISSUES
ISSUE PROPONENT & DOCUMENT SYMBOL
Principles & objectives African Group – TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1 and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
African Group – TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1/Add.1
LDCs – TN/CTD/W/4
United States – TN/CTD/W/9
Japan – TN/CTD/W/11
Single-tiered, 2-tiered or multi-tieredstructure of rights and obligations?African Group – TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1 and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
LDCs - TN/CTD/W/4
Coherence African Group – TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1 and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
LDCs – TN/CTD/W/4
Bench marks LDCs – TN/CTD/W/4
Technical Assistance  and Capacity Building African Group – TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1 and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
United States - TN/CTD/W/9
Transition periods African Group – TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1 and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
United States - TN/CTD/W/9
Utilization United States - TN/CTD/W/9
Japan– TN/CTD/W/11
Trade Preferences  and Related Issues,
including the Enabling ClauseParaguay – TN/CTD/W/5, TN/CTD/W/5/Add.1and TN/CTD/W/5/Add.2
African  Group – TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1 andTN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
LDCs – TN/CTD/W/4/Add.1
Hungary – TN/CTD/W/10
Universal or differentiated treatment? African Group – TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1 and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
Issues related to graduation United States – TN/CTD/W/9TN/CTD/W/12/Rev.1
Page 7
ANNEX III
SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC SUBMISSIONS ON AGREEMENTS & DECISIONS
AS OF 19JULY 2002
AGREEMENT &
ARTICLE / PARAGRAPHNUMBER OF
PROPOSALSPROPONENT(S) DOCUMENT
REFERENCE
GENERAL AGREEMENT ON TARIFFSAND TRADE 1994 (GATT 1994)
Whole Agreement 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
Article XVIII:A 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
Article XVIII:B 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
Article XVIII:C 2 St. Lucia
LDCsTN/CTD/W/8
TN/CTD/W/4/Add.1
Article XXXVI 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
Article XXXVII 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
andTN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
Article XXXVIII 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
UNDERSTANDING ON THEINTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE
II:1(B) OF THE GATT 1994
Proposal 1 African Group  TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
UNDERSTANDING ON THEINTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE XVII
OF THE GATT 1994
Proposal 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
andTN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
UNDERSTANDING ON BALANCE-OF-PAYMENTS PROVISIONS OF THE
GATT 1994
Paragraph 8 1 LDCs TN/CTD/W/4/Add.1
Proposal 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2TN/CTD/W/12/Rev.1
Page 8
AGREEMENT &
ARTICLE / PARAGRAPHNUMBER OF
PROPOSALSPROPONENT(S) DOCUMENT
REFERENCE
UNDERSTANDING ON THEINTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE
XXIV OF THE GATT 1994
Proposal 2 African Group
LDCsTN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
TN/CTD/W/4/Add.1
UNDERSTANDING IN RESPECT OFWAIVERS OF OBLIGATIONS UNDERTHE GATT 1994
Proposal 2 African Group
LDCsTN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
TN/CTD/W/4/Add.1
UNDERSTANDING ON THEINTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE
XXVIII OF THE GATT 1994
Paragraph 1 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
AGREEMENT ON AGRICULTURE
Article 6.2 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
andTN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
Article 14 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
Article 15.1 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
Article 15.2 2 African Group
LDCsTN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
TN/CTD/W/4
AGREEMENT ON SANITARY ANDPHYTO-SANITARY MEASURES (SPS)
Article 9.2 2 LMG
African GroupTN/CTD/W/2
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
Article 10.1 2 LMG
African GroupTN/CTD/W/2
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
Article 10.2 & Paragraph 3.1 of the Decisionon Implementation-Related Issues and
Concerns1 India TN/CTD/W/6TN/CTD/W/12/Rev.1
Page 9
AGREEMENT &
ARTICLE / PARAGRAPHNUMBER OF
PROPOSALSPROPONENT(S) DOCUMENT
REFERENCE
Article 10.3 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/2
 TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
Article 10.4 & Vide Paragraph 3.5 of the
Decision on Implementation-Related Issues
and Concerns1 India TN/CTD/W/6
Article 10.4 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
andTN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
AGREEMENT ON TEXTILES ANDCLOTHING
Paragraph 2 of Article 1 & Paragraph 18 ofArticle 21 LDCs TN/CTD/W/4/Add.1
Articles 2.18 & 6.6 1 African Group  TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
AGREEMENT ON TECHNICALBARRIERS TO TRADE (TBT)
Articles 11 & 12 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
Article 12.3 1 LMG TN/CTD/W/2
AGREEMENT ON TRADE-RELATED
INVESTMENT MEASURES (TRIMS)
Whole Agreement 1 LDCs TN/CTD/W/4
Article 3 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
Article 4 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
Article 5.3 1 African Group  TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
AGREEMENT ON IMPLEMENTATIONOF ARTICLE VI OF THE GATT 1994
(ANTI-DUMPING)
Article 15 1 African Group  TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
andTN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2TN/CTD/W/12/Rev.1
Page 10
AGREEMENT &
ARTICLE / PARAGRAPHNUMBER OF
PROPOSALSPROPONENT(S) DOCUMENT
REFERENCE
AGREEMENT ON THEIMPLEMENTATION OF ARTICLE VII
OF GATT 1994 (CUSTOMS
VALUATION)
Article 20.1-2 1 African Group  TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
andTN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
Article 20.3 1 African Group  TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
AGREEMENT ON PRESHIPMENTINSPECTION (PSI)
Article 3.3 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
AGREEMENT ON RULES OF ORIGIN
Proposal 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
AGREEMENT ON IMPORTLICENCING
Article 1.2 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
andTN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
Article 3.5 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
Article 3.5 (a)(iv) 1 Thailand TN/CTD/W/7
Article 3.5 (j) 1 India TN/CTD/W/6
AGREEMENT ON SUBSIDIES ANDCOUNTER-VAILING MEASURES
Paragraph 1 of Article 2 1 & Paragraph 4 ofArticle III of GATT 1994
(and paragraphs 1 (b) & 27.3 of the Subsidies
Agreement)1 LDCs TN/CTD/W/4
Article 27.1 2 LMG (not
including Egypt
and Mauritius)
African GroupTN/CTD/W/1
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
Article 27.4 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2TN/CTD/W/12/Rev.1
Page 11
AGREEMENT &
ARTICLE / PARAGRAPHNUMBER OF
PROPOSALSPROPONENT(S) DOCUMENT
REFERENCE
Article 27.8 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
Article 27.9 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
Article 27.13 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
Article 27.15 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
andTN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
AGREEMENT ON SAFEGUARDS
Article 9.1-2 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
andTN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
GENERAL AGREEMENT ON TRADEIN SERVICES (GATS)
Article IV 2 African Group
LDCsTN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
TN/CTD/W/4/Add.1
Article IV:1 1 LDCs TN/CTD/W/4/Add.1
Article IV:2 1 LDCs TN/CTD/W/4/Add.1
Article IV:3 1 LDCs TN/CTD/W/4/Add.1
Article V:3 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
Article XXV 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
Annex on Telecommunications
Paragraph 6 1 LDCs TN/CTD/W/4/Add.1
AGREEMENT ON TRADE-RELATEDASPECTS OF INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY RIGHTS (TRIPS)
Articles 65, 66.1, 70.8 & 70.9 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
andTN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
Articles 7, 8 & 66.2 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
Article 66.1 1 LDCs TN/CTD/W/4/Add.1TN/CTD/W/12/Rev.1
Page 12
AGREEMENT &
ARTICLE / PARAGRAPHNUMBER OF
PROPOSALSPROPONENT(S) DOCUMENT
REFERENCE
Article 67 1 LDCs TN/CTD/W/4/Add.1
UNDER-STANDING ON RULES ANDPROCEDURES GOVERNING THE
SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES  (DSU)
Article  4.10 2 India
African GroupTN/CTD/W/6
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
Article 8.10 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
andTN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
Article 12.10 2 LMG
African GroupTN/CTD/W/2
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
Article 12.11 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
Article 21.2 1 India TN/CTD/W/6
Articles 21.2, 21.7 & 21.8 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
andTN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
Article 24.1 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
DECISION ON MEASURES INFAVOUR OF LEAST-DEVELOPED
COUNTRIES
Paragraph 1 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
Paragraph 2 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
andTN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
Paragraph 2 (ii) 1 LDCs TN/CTD/W/4
DECISION ON MEASURESCONCERNING THE POSSIBLENEGATIVE EFFECTS OF THE
REFORM PROGRAMME ON LEAST-
DEVELOPED AND NET FOOD-
IMPORTING DEVELOPING
COUNTRIES
Proposal 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
andTN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2TN/CTD/W/12/Rev.1
Page 13
AGREEMENT &
ARTICLE / PARAGRAPHNUMBER OF
PROPOSALSPROPONENT(S) DOCUMENT
REFERENCE
DIFFERENTIAL AND MOREFAVOURABLE TREATMENT,
RECIPROCITY AND FULLER
PARTICIPATION OF DEVELOPING
COUNTRIES (ENABLING CLAUSE):DECISION OF 28 NOVEMBER 1979
Paragraph 1 & 2(d) 1 LDCs TN/CTD/W/4/Add.1
Paragraph 3 (d) 1 LDCs TN/CTD/W/4/Add.1
Proposal 1 African Group TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1
and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2
Whole Decision 2 Paraguay
LDCsTN/CTD/W/5,
TN/CTD/W/5/Add.1
and
TN/CTD/W/5/Add.2
TN/CTD/W/4/Add.1
Note  – the provisions referred to in Annexes III & IV of TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.1 and
TN/CTD/W/3/Rev.2 are not included in this table.
__________