RESTRICTEDWORLD TRADE
ORGANIZATIONG/C/W/156
30 June 1999
(99-2699)
Council for Trade in Goods
TRADE FACILITATION
Draft Status report by the Council for Trade in Goods
I. INTRODUCTION
1. Paragraph 21 of the Singapore Ministerial Declaration (WT/MIN/(96)/DEC) directed the
Council for Trade in Goods
"to undertake exploratory and analytical work, drawing on the work of other relevant
organizations, on the simplification of trade procedures in order to assess the scope for
WTO rules in this area."
2. Since Singapore, trade facilitation has been a standing item on the agenda of the Council for
Trade in Goods.  Discussions took place at the meetings of 27 January and 12 February 1997
(G/C/M/17), 11 March 1997 (G/C /M/18), 11 June 1997 (G/C/M/20), 21 July 1997 (G/C/M/22),
6 October 1997 (G/C/M/23), 19 November and 8 December 1997 (G/C/M/28), 4 February and4 March 1998 (G/C/M/30), 16 March 1998 (G/C/M/31), 21 April 1998 (G/C/M/33), as well as the
meeting of 5 June and 8 July 1998 (G/C/M/34).  Upon request by the Council on 27 January 1997, the
Secretariat prepared a background note on work already done or being done on the subject of trade
facilitation in other international organizations, including non-governmental organizations
(G/C/W/80).  The European Comm unity (G/C/W/85) and Switzerland  (G/C/W/92) introduced papers
on trade facilitation.
3. At its meeting of 19 November and 8 Decemb er 1997, the CTG decided to hold a Symposium
on Trade Facilitation to enable delegations to better identify the main areas where traders face
obstacles when moving goods across borders.  The purpose of the Symposium was further to provide
a direct interface between the practical level (traders) and the trade policy level (officials in capitals
and in Geneva) in this respect and to place WTO Members in a position to move to the phase of
analytical work on trade facilitation, in order to assess the scope for WTO rules in this area, as set outin the Singapore Declaration.
4. The WTO Trade Facilitation Symposium took place on 9 and 10 March 1998 at the WTO.
Twenty-seven speakers from private enterprises and industry groups gave an overview of a number of
areas where traders face obstacles when moving goods across borders.  Speakers fromintergovernmental organizations (IMF, ITC, UNCTAD, UN/ECE, World Bank, and World Customs
Organization) reported on the experiences in their work on trade facilitation.
5. At the meeting of 16 March 1998, the Chairman of the CTG made a brief summary of the
outcome of the Symposium, circulated in document G/L/226.  The Secretariat prepared a "checklist ofissues" (G/C/W/113) summarizing concrete suggestions made at the Symposium, and a longer factual
report on the Symposium (G/C/W/115) containing full  copies or transcripts of the presentations made
and the ensuing discussions.  In addition, the text of the Secretariat’s presentation on WTO rules
relevant to trade facilitation, which was made during the Symposium, was circulated (G/L/244).G/C/W/156
Page 2
6. Following the Symposium, Switzerland (G/C/W/114) and informally the European
Community circulated proposals on a framework for future exploratory and analytical work.  The
CTG decided that it was necessary to conduct further exploratory and analytical work in a dedicated
forum in order to focus more specifically on questions of trade facilitation outside the framework of
formal CTG meetings.
7. At its meeting on 8 July 1998, the Council for Trade in Goods (CTG) agreed to a Chairman’s
proposal on the continuation of work on trade faci litation, as mandated in paragraph 21 of the
Singapore Ministerial Declaratio n (WT/MIN(96)DEC).  The Chairman’s proposal, contained in the
minutes of the meeting (G/C/M/34), reads as follows:
"1. The Council for Trade in Goods will hold regular, informal meetings to continue the
work on trade facilitation, as set out in paragraph 21 of the Singapore Ministerial
Declaration.
2. The schedule of meetings (each lasting 2-3 days) and the core agenda will be as noted
below:
(1) import and export procedures and requirements, including customs and border-
crossing problems; overview of the Kyoto Convention and its current revision
process – September 1998;
(2) physical movement of consignments (transport and transit); payments, insurance
and other financial requirements which affect the cross-border movement of
goods in international trade - December 1998;
(3) electronic facilities and their importance for facilitating international trade;
technical cooperation and development issues relating to simplification of trade
procedures; consideration of WTO Agreements relating to, or including
provisions on, trade facilitation - March 1999;
(4) evaluation of the exploratory and analytical work to assess the scope for WTO
rules in the area of trade facilitation - June 1999.
Although this agenda should, for the sake of efficiency, be adhered to as closely
as possible, there should be freedom at any meeting to address issues from any other
meeting or to bring in any other related issue and question.  Prior to the fourth meeting,
the Secretariat will compile a factual summary of the first three meetings to assist
Members in evaluating the work undertaken thus far.
3. Furthermore, the Chairman of the CTG will invite the Chairpersons of the Committees
on Customs Valuation, Import Licensing, Rules of Origin, Sanitary and Phytosanitary
Measures, Technical Barriers to Trade, the Chairperson of the Working Party on
Preshipment Inspection and, as appropriate, the Chairpersons of other subsidiary bodiesof the CTG to propose an item "trade facilitation" for inclusion in the agenda of their
meetings.  Under this agenda item, these bodies will henceforth address those aspects of
trade facilitation which they regard as being related to the respective agreements with a
view to introducing the results of these discussions into the informal CTG discussions on
trade facilitation in March 1999.  The Chairman of the CTG will also contact theChairpersons of the Council for Trade in Services and the Council for TRIPS as well as
the Chairperson of the Committee on Trade and Development to suggest that these
bodies make a similar contribution.G/C/W/156
Page 3
4. Other international inter-governmental organizations with expertise and experience in
the field of trade facilitation (notably ITC, UN/ECE, UNCTAD and WCO) will be
invited to contribute to the exploratory and analytical work.  Specific arrangements to
this effect will be made in the informal meetings of the CTG or in the WTO bodies
mentioned under para 3 supra as appropriate.  A symposium with non-governmentalorganizations and specialists from the private sector will be considered.
5. To ensure the success of the exercise, Members are encouraged to submit substantive
ideas and proposals at all stages of the process.
6. The results of the exploratory and analytical work mandated by the Singapore
Ministerial Declaration should be reported by the CTG to the General Council."
8. The Council for Trade in Goods met in three informal meetings (28-29 September 1998,
7
 December 1998, and 19-20 April 1999) to discuss the issues set out in paragraph 2 (1) – (3) of the
Chairman’s proposal.  At the first meeting, on 28 and 29 September 1998, a presentation was made by
the WCO Secretariat on the content and review process of the  Convention on the Simplification and
Harmonization of Customs Procedures  (Kyoto Convention).  On 20 April 1999, the Secretariat
organized an information session at which three e xperts, from the Inter-American Development Bank,
UNCTAD, and the WTO, gave presentations on technical cooperation and development issues relating
to simplification of trade procedures, as well as on electronic facilities and their importance for
facilitating international trade.
9. Several Member delegations and two observers circulated written contributions to the
informal work process of the Council for Trade in Goods.  A summary table of these contributions is
contained in the Annex to this document.  The summary table also lists background notes by the
Secretariat, which were prepared in the context of the work programme.
10. The contributions made by other WTO bodies in accordance with paragraph 3 of the
Chairman's proposal are contained in document G/C/W/149.
11. Paragraphs 7-8 and 13-50 of this report repr oduce the text of document G/C/W/153, a factual
summary of the informal meetings of the CTG in September and December 1998 and April 1999.That document was prepared in accordance with the last sentence of paragraph 2 of the Chairman’s
proposal and was intended to assist Members in evaluating the work undertaken thus far.  Paragraphs 13-
50 below provide an overview of the main points that were raised in the three informal meetings.  A
summary of the discussion at the fourth informal meeting is contained under heading IV of this report
This report does not provide an exhaustive summary of all the proposals and arguments presented in
the written contributions, but it seeks to reflect the main thrust of the issues addressed in the papers
and at the informal meetings.
12. This status report is without prejudice to decisions by the Council for Trade in Goods on the
question of future work on trade facilitation.
II. DISCUSSION ON BENEFITS AND MEANS TO ENHANCE TRADE FACILITATION
A. O
VERALL BENEFITS AND BENEFITS FOR DEVELOPING ECONOMIES
13. Delegations agreed that the simplification of trade procedures had potential for considerable
savings in time, money, as well as human and other resources and could result in substantial benefits
for each and every economy.  Several Members referred to studies that had shown that the savings
potential through enhancement of trade facilitation can be a considerable portion of the value of thegoods traded, often exceeding the costs of tariffs and other duties and charges.  Unlike the latter, costsG/C/W/156
Page 4
incurred through inefficiencies in the transaction chain did not have redistributive effects, but were
dead-weight losses for the economy.
14. Several Members stated that trade facilitation was benefitting all actors in an economy:
importers and exporters through time and money savings, producers through cheaper availability ofintermediate products, consumers through lower prices, administrations through increased efficiency,
enhanced control effectiveness, and the availability of accurate statistics.  Such statistics enabled
Members to carry out accurate economic forecasting and to base their policy choices on such
information.
15. It was argued by several delegations that an improved administrative framework for trade
transactions would benefit especially small and medium-sized enterprises (SME's), as these wereusually at a disadvantage in coping with untransparent trade procedures and would as a result often
opt to stick to their traditional markets.  Trade facilitation would thus expand the trading opportunities
for these companies, and help increase the number of potential trading partners.
16. It was stressed by several delegation that trade facilitation needed to be balanced with other
policy objectives, such as enforcement and protection from trafficking illicit goods.  It was argued that
modern customs techniques such as profiling and risk assessment could contribute towards both
objectives at the same time. Simplification and automation, combined with training and better pay for
a smaller number of customs officers, and driven by high-level political commitment, would also
contribute to greater integrity and help eradicate related problems.
17. Some Members stated that trade facilitation was a critical element in any country's economic
infrastructure.  In an age of 'just-in-time' manufacturing and distribution, a facilitative environment for
imports and exports would not only benefit a country's trade, but was increasingly an important factor
in the investment decisions of the private sector.
18. By reducing the costs involved in the trade process and enhancing trade opportunities, it was
argued that trade facilitation was benefitting all Members. Trade facilitation would consequently not
present a situation necessitating the exchange of mutual concessions, but presented a 'win-win'
situation in which all Members stood to gain.  Some delegations stated that simplification of trade
procedures was strengthening the functioning of the multilateral trading system as a whole.
B. T
HE ROLE OF AUTOMATION
19. Several delegations emphasized that automation was an important tool in the creation of a
facilitative environment for trade.  On the basis of simplified information requirements and
procedures, automation had not only the potential to reduce errors, avoid double entry of information,
and accelerate information flows, but would also allow for increasing de-linkage of movement ofgoods from controls and duty assessments, thus minimizing the time that consignments spend idle,
while enhancing an administration’s control effectiveness and ability to collect revenue.  It was stated
that, for many administrations, automation was critical in order to address challenges of increasing
trade flows in the face of stable or falling budget resources.  Time gained in processing documentation
and through more selective controls based on risk-assessment would translate into direct resourcegains for administrations.  Moreover, the rapid advances in information technology development
made it conceivable that some countries could leap-frog systems that were currently in place in
countries with a longer history of automation.  It was stated by several delegations that automation
needed to extend beyond customs administrations, and needed to include all players in the trade
transaction chain.
20. The recent developments in information techno logy had led to the emergence of inexpensive
technology solutions, e.g. internet-based solutions, which would particularly enable SMEs to reap theG/C/W/156
Page 5
benefits of electronic communication with government agencies, as well as other participants in the
trade transaction chain.
21. One delegation emphasized that in choosing between automated systems, the demands of
traders ranging from multinationals to SME’s needed to be satisfied.  Complex and costly systemswould not be appropriate tools in facilitating trade.  Therefore, a range of information technology
options which catered to the needs of different types of clients may have to be introduced.  Systems
and content of information needed to be harmonized between administrations, and legislative
requirements for paper documentation had to be abandoned
1.  Some delegations stated that automated
messages should be based on or be compatible wi th the UN/EDIFACT messaging standard.  Other
delegations believed that prescriptions for a particular proprietary standard would be inopportune, and
could possibly, through locking in of antiquated solutions, inhibit use of the best availabletechnologies.  Open and non-proprietary standards where thus preferable.  It was necessary to involve
all players in the trade cycle to make automation and electronic facilities most beneficial.
22. Other delegations, while acknowledging the promise of automation, raised doubts as to the
feasibility of introducing automated systems to thei r administrations in the near future.  Potentially
high start-up costs, poor infrastructure, and lacking human resources were cited as the main obstacles
in this respect.
23. Several Members provided papers
2 and oral presentations on their national experiences with
aspects of trade facilitation.  All oral presentations evolved around a common theme, namely progress
in processing of information and clearance of goods through the introduction of automated systems.
One Member reported that the introduction of an automated customs clearance system had reduced
clearance times for sea cargo from an average 26.1 hours in 1991 to 5.6 hours in 1998; clearance
times for air cargo had been reduced from 2.3 to 0.7 hours over that period.  Another Member stated
that its ‘single-window’ for electronic data submission would usually lead to completion of allinformation requirements within 15-30 minutes.  One Member stated that it had introduced an EDI-
based ‘green channel’ clearing scheme which would in the future be able to handle 30-40% of
consignments.
C. T
ECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
24. It was recognized that technical co-operation was instrumental for moving towards a higher
degree of trade facilitation.  Some delegations stated that WTO commitments on trade facilitationneeded to be complemented with the appropria te means for implementation.  Existing technical
assistance programmes by other intergovernmental organizations would typically address only
specific parts of what was believed to be a whole set of related trade procedures.  Such programmes,
which were each by itself good tools, would often overlap and were rarely well co-ordinated with one
another.
25. Several delegations stated that the WTO itself was not in a position to provide the technical
expertise required for much of this technical assistance.  However, some of these delegations believed
that the WTO could set the basic trade policy framework, and provide a platform for co-operation and
co-ordination with other intergovernmental organiza tions who were providing technical assistance in
this area, i.e. UNCTAD, WCO, World Bank and IMF
3.
26. Several delegations believed that any comprehensive technical co-operation effort needed to
involve all players in the trading process.  Co-operation and dialogue between government authorities
                                                     
1  G/C/W/152.
2  G/C/W/123; G/C/W/125; G/C/W/134; G/C/W/146.
3 G/C/W/136.G/C/W/156
Page 6
and the private sector were useful to identify the best possible strategies and products that would
benefit both partners.  If backed by a credible willingness to reform, such partnerships could lead to
private sector engagement in the development and provision of appropriate automated tools, training,
and infrastructure investment for ports, transport and communications.
III. OVERVIEW OF THE DISCUSSIONS ON A ROLE FOR THE WTO IN TRADE
FACILITATION
27. Delegations agreed that the WTO should avoid duplication of work with other organizations.
A. IMPLEMENTATION OF EXISTING AGREEMENTS
28. There was consensus that implementation of existing agreements, such as the Agreements on
Customs Valuation, Import Licensing, Rules of Origin, Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, TechnicalBarriers to Trade, Preshipment Inspection, as well as the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of
Intellectual Property Rights was of crucial importance for the facilitation of trade.  Delegations were of
the view that at present the implementation of several WTO Agreements was incomplete.
29. Some delegations believed that the WTO should mainly focus on the implementation of
existing agreements, and consider new areas for work only once it became clear that problems did
persist despite complete implementation.
B. N
EED AND SCOPE FOR NEW WTO RULES
30. There were differing views regarding the need and scope for additional WTO rules on trade
facilitation.  While some delegations believed that new multilateral rules could be beneficial, others
believed that there was no need for additional multilateral rules and that work on trade facilitation
should be left to other organizations which were already carrying out work in that area and/or national
initiatives.
31. Some delegations stated that the WTO could develop general guidelines or recommendations
to provide political support for trade facilitation initiatives that were under way elsewhere, both
nationally and in other international fora.  One delegation stated that non-binding recommendations
could be developed regarding ‘single-window’ information submission, or use of automated systems4.
(a) Arguments in favour of new WTO rules
32. It was argued by some delegations that predictability and security for exporters and importers
was best secured with a set of multilaterally binding rules on trade facilitation.  Regarding other
subjects, where initiatives in other organizations had not succeeded in bringing about multilaterally
applied disciplines, Members had in the past been able to develop regulatory frameworks in the
GATT/WTO that they were willing to  respect.  This apparent strength of the organization could also
be used for the development of a multilaterally binding set of rules on trade facilitation.  Tradefacilitation rules would strengthen already existing disciplines contained in other WTO Agreements.
The WTO had the capacity to identify what was in the common interest for trade.  A set of basic
WTO rules on trade facilitation would guide reform efforts in a consistent direction and provide the
necessary sustained political commitment that was in strumental for successful administrative reform
in this area.  Experience had shown that in addition to practical ‘bottom-up’ technical assistance, arule bound ‘top-down’ strategy was needed.  By the same token, a credible ‘top-down’ approach
backed by WTO rules made it easier to attract sustained private sector engagement in the reform
efforts.
                                                     
4 G/C/W/150.G/C/W/156
Page 7
(b) Arguments against new WTO rules
33. A number of delegations believed that the ar guments made in favour of new WTO rules on
trade facilitation were not compelling.  While the overall benefits of trade facilitation were recognized
by all Members and many delegations stated that they were convinced of the usefulness of many ofthe concepts advocated, it was argued that the problems which developing economies were facing in
this area could not be solved by the introduction of binding commitments subject to the WTO dispute
settlement mechanism.  Instead, a vast effort in technical assistance and capacity building was needed
to support national reform efforts and to tackle the main problems of delays and administrative
inefficiencies.  However, resources for achieving and enhancing comprehensive technical progress
that included software development and installation, training, modification of administrative
procedures were limited.
34. It was further argued that many Members were still grappling with the implementation of
certain commitments from the Uruguay Round, and th at these implementation issues needed to be
addressed before consideration could be given to additional rules.
C. P
ROPOSED FRAMEWORKS FOR NEW WTO RULES
35. Several delegations set out concrete proposals for future WTO rules in trade facilitation.  The
full proposals are contained in the respective written submissions, a list of which is annexed to this
summary.  In addition, an inventory of the concrete proposals for future WTO rules was prepared by
the by the Secretariat (G/C/W/132, G/C/W/132/Rev.1.)  This inventory also refers to internationalinstruments that address the subject-matter of the proposals.
36. Several delegations believed that the WTO should seek to identify areas where new rules
could fill gaps in the existing framework of rules, and add value for the overall enhancement of trade
facilitation.
37. Proponents of WTO rules on trade facilitation agreed that transparency of rules, regulations,
and administrative rulings and practices was of critical importance for participants in the trade
transaction process.
38. One delegation proposed that a framework for WTO rules should include the following
elements:  (i) procedural and substantive improvement of existing WTO Agreements;(ii) incorporation of elements of work undertaken in other organizations into the legal framework of
the WTO; (iii) development of additional rules in the areas of customs procedures, and possibly also
in transport, and banking and payment issues.
39. Another delegation stated that a set of binding WTO commitments could be built around the
principles of efficiency and simplification, consistency and harmonization, transparency, protection
and compliance, integrity, cooperation, and consultations
5.  Some of these principles were already
embodied in GATT Articles VIII (Fees and Formalities connected with Importation and Exportation)
and X (Publication and Administration of Trade Regulations).  Concepts such as advance rulings,
release of goods, and review and appeal which existed only in some of the WTO Agreements, shouldbe extended to other areas.  As appropriate, elements of existing international instruments, such as the
Kyoto Convention, should be incorporated into such a set of rules.
                                                     
5  G/C/W/126.G/C/W/156
Page 8
40. It was stated by another delegation that the core objectives of trade facilitation were increased
‘transparency’ and ‘rapid release of goods.’  GATT Articles VIII and X provided a foundation upon
which new rules could be elaborated.
41. Another delegation believed that, if a WTO instrument on trade facilitation was to be
developed, it should contain (i) improved rules on transparency, (ii) encouragement of mutual
recognition of documents, (iii) and increased use of rules and practices developed and recommended
by non-governmental organizations such as ISO standards.  It should further incorporate or refer to
instruments of other fora, e.g. the Kyoto Convention6.
42. One delegation suggested that the WTO should oversee the policy aspects of the Kyoto
Convention, including the dispute settlement procedures, while the WCO should handle technicalaspects of trade facilitation
7.
D. OVERVIEW OF THE PROPOSALS FOR RULES AND /OR MEASURES FOR ENHANCING TRADE
FACILITATION
(a) Customs and Border Crossing Procedures
43. In order to simplify information requirements related to import and export, one delegation
proposed to reduce and harmonize data sets and to seek adoption of international standards (such as
UN-ECE Recommendations) for import and export data.  A harmonized documentation format, based
on the UN aligned document system, should be developed.  Traders should be allowed to submit
required data for their transactions at one time only and to one single agency.  The benefits of such a‘one-stop’ or ‘single-window’ approach would be greatly enhanced through a seamless electronic
transaction.  On the basis of automated systems for customs data, administrations could be required to
effectively engage in automated customs clearan ce, pre-arrival processing of information, post-
clearance and audit-based controls.  Automated systems should be used to run risk-assessment
programmes which would help minimize physical interventions.  Establishment of objective criteriafor authorized traders would minimize interference w ith legitimate trade.  A target time for clearance
could be envisioned, and official interventions at borders should be coordinated between agencies
(one-stop clearance).  Members should grant timely judicial or administrative redress against
administrative decisions.  Co-operation between trade and government should be fostered.
8
44. Another delegation proposed consideration of rules that ensured quick release of goods.
Customs administrations should be required to use risk assessment principles, and border agenciesneeded to cooperate, in order to allow for ‘single window’ submission of data and clearance of goods.
Information requirements for import and export should be simplified and harmonized, and compatible
electronic data interchange (EDI) systems needed to be put in place.  In addition, this delegation
proposed simplified and streamlined clearance procedures for commercial samples and goods for
exhibition, express consignment clearance, simplified procedures for low values shipments,transparency (availability of requirements), and increased use of advance rulings, e.g. in
classification.
9
45. Another delegation suggested consideration of mutual recognition of documents or data.10
                                                     
6  G/C/W/137.
7  G/C/W/150.
8  For details on these proposals, see G/C/W/122 and G/C/W/138.
9  G/C/W/126.
10  G/C/W/137.G/C/W/156
Page 9
46. Some delegations proposed establishing a comprehensive database assembling all relevant
laws, regulations and rulings for import and export.11
(b) Movement of Goods
47. One delegation suggested consideration of adoption of UN-EC E Recommendations 11
and 12, as well as integration of other instruments into a WTO Trade Facilitation framework.
Instruments explicitly mentioned were the IMO FAL Convention , Annex 9 (Facilitation) of the ICAO
1944 Convention on International Civil Aviation , and the Montreal Protocol IV of the Warsaw
Convention.12
(c) Payment, Insurance and other Financial Requirements
48. One delegation proposed to develop measures to improve access to credit information and
suggested further development of ISO quality mana gement standards on payment delays. Also, access
problems to commercial insurance could be addressed.  Furthermore, the problem of late payment in
commercial transactions could possibly be addressed within the WTO.13
(d) Possible amendments to existing WTO Agreements
49. Certain delegations believed that that a trade facilitation framework that was centred around
reduced and harmonized data requirements, modernized customs techniques, a ‘single-window’ for
submission of information, and automated proced ures, should apply to the Agreements on Import
Licensing Procedures, Technical Barriers to Trade, SPS, Rules of Origin, and PSI.14
50. Other delegations believed that existing agreements were not always consistent in theirapproach to trade facilitation-enhancing measures.  In this context, it was suggested that the concepts
of advance ruling, release of goods, and review and appeal which existed only in some of the
agreements, should be extended to other areas.  For example, advance rulings would also be useful
regarding goods classification.
51. On the proposal to amend existing WTO Agreements, one delegation stated that the WTO
Agreements constituted a single undertaking and contained, as a whole, a balance of rights and
obligations.
IV. SUMMARY OF MAIN POINTS RAISED DURING THE EVALUATION OF THE
EXPLORATORY AND ANALYTICAL WORK
52. At the fourth informal meeting held on 21 June 1999, delegations evaluated the exploratory
and analytical work undertaken up to that point.  In this context, as mandated by the Chairman’s
proposal on future work, the Secretariat had prepared a factual summary of the discussions and
contributions made in the context of work carried out at the first three meetings (G/C/W/153).
Delegations agreed that this factual summary reflected the status of work up until the end of the thirdmeeting and further agreed that its content should be part of the present status report
15.
                                                     
11 G/C/W/122, G/C/W/151.
12  G/C/W/133; for additional information on these instruments, see G/C/W/132/Rev.1.
13 G/C/W/133.
14 For concrete proposals on the further procedural and substantive improvement of existing
    Agreements, see G/C/W/136 and G/C/W/151).
15 The text of document G/C/W/153 is reproduced in paragraphs 7-8 and 13-50 above.G/C/W/156
Page 10
53. The evaluation process at the meeting of 21 June 1999 underscored the general agreement
among delegations that trade facilitation was beneficial for traders, business, consumers, and the
economies of all Members as a whole.  There was further agreement that implementation of existing
agreements was of critical importance.  Furthermore, delegations agreed that technical cooperation, to
be truly effective, required improved coordination among recipients and all involved in the provisionof such assistance.  One delegation suggested that the WTO should promote coordination in that area.
54. The views of delegations differed, however, as regards conclusions to be drawn from the
exploratory and analytical work carried out under the work programme.
55. Some delegations believed that the next step forward would lie in reaching agreement on
concrete areas appropriate for rule making.  They saw WTO rules as beneficial in providing politicalcommitment to any reform and modernization process of customs and trade administrations.  A set of
rules was seen by some as ensuring that domestic reform efforts were based on the same principles in
all countries, thus being of complementary nature rather than involving different reform approaches.
Furthermore, the negotiation of rules was seen as stimulating provision of increased technical
assistance.  Delegations who held this view were looking forward to addressing trade facilitationissues in the context of the preparatory process for the Ministerial Conference.
56. Other delegations believed that the present autonomous efforts undertaken by many countries
in the area of trade facilitation would stimulate an equal amount of political commitment.  It was
further stated that these efforts were generally based on models that would ensure that countries weremoving in the same direction.  Several delegations reiterated their view that a focus on rule making
was, if ever, not appropriate at present.  It was mentioned that the next Ministerial Conference could
possibly focus the Singapore trade facilitation mandate more specifically towards work that would
identify any existing gaps in WTO agreements.
57. Some delegations suggested that the development of best practice or non-binding
recommendations, building on work carried out in other organizations, be considered; another
delegation stated that only those areas that seemed not amenable to rule making should be addressed
in this way.  Some delegations rejected these ideas  and stated that the strength of the WTO was in its
rule-based legal framework rather than in the development of best practice.  It was mentioned by
some delegations that the WTO should express support for the adoption and implementation of the
revised Kyoto Convention.
58. Some delegations touched on areas for further exploratory and analytical work.  Some
observed that trade facilitation was one of the main objectives set out in many WTO agreements.  One
delegation stated that the input received by subsidiary bodies on the relationship between existing
agreements and trade facilitation was only preliminary and should be supplemented in the future
16.
Some delegations were of the view that particular consideration should be given to exploring options
to improve or build upon existing agreements.  In order to see where trade facilitation aspects in the
relevant agreements could be strengthened, some suggested that the current status of implementation
should be reviewed.  A suggestion was also made that the Secretariat prepare a survey on problems in
the implementation of existing WTO agreements, drawing on input received from the Committees, theinformation on implementation problems submitted to the General Council, and the discussions held
in the context of the first phase of the preparatory meetings for the Ministerial Conference.
59. Some delegations suggested that the development dimension of trade facilitation needed
further examination.  One delegation suggested that a one day seminar on trade facilitation could helpclarify some aspects in this area.
                                                     
16  The contributions received from other WTO bodies were circulated in document G/C/W/149.G/C/W/156
Page 11
ANNEX
Overview of written contributions on Trade Facilitation
Symbol Member / Other
SourceDate Title and Topic
G/C/W/70 WTO Secretariat 28 February 1997 Trade Facilitation – Background note
by the Secretariat
G/C/W/80 WTO Secretariat 23 May 1997 Trade Facilitation – Background note
by the Secretariat
G/C/W/85 European Communities 20 August 1997 Trade Fac ilitation
G/C/W/92 Switzerland 30 September 1997 Trade Fac ilitation - Draft Plan of
Action
G/L/226 Statement by the
Chairman of the CTG18 March 1998 Statement concerning the Trade
Facilitation Symposium
G/C/W/113 WTO Secretariat 20 April 1998 Checklist of Issues Raised During the
WTO Trade Facilitation Symposium
G/C/W/114 Switzerland 26 May 1998 Swiss Proposal for Future Work in the
WTO
G/C/W/115 WTO Secretariat 29 May 1998 WTO Trade Facilitation Symposium –
Report by the Secretariat
G/L/244 WTO Secretariat 15 May 1998 WTO rules relevant to Trade
Facilitation - Statement by theDirector of the Market AccessDivision
G/C/W/122 European Communities 22 September 1998 Assessment of Scope for WTO Rules in
the Field of Import, Export, and
Customs Procedures
G/C/W/123 Republic of Korea 25 September 1998 Reforming the Customs Clearance
System in Korea(National Experience Paper)
G/C/W/125 Hong Kong, China 28 September 1998 Import and Export Procedures and
Requirements(National Experience Paper)
G/C/W/126 Canada 30 September 1998 Trade Fac ilitation
(Suggestions for a WTO role in trade
facilitation)
G/C/W/80/Add.1 WTO Secretariat 2 December 1998 Update of background note G/C/W/80
(information on trade facilitation workcarried out by other internationalorganizations)
G/C/W/132 WTO Secretariat 2 December 1998 Backgro und note
(Inventory of delegations’ suggestions)
G/C/W/133 European Communities 3 December 1998 Issues Relating to the Physical
Movement of Consignments
(Transport and Transit) & Payment,Insurance and Other FinancialQuestions Affecting Cross-borderTrade in Goods
G/C/W/134 Republic of Korea 22 December 1998 Matters Related to the Facilitation of
Cargo Movement in Korea
(National Experience Paper)G/C/W/156
Page 12
Symbol Member / Other
SourceDate Title and Topic
IP/C/W/123 WTO Secretariat 5 January 1999 The TRIPS Agreement and Trade
Facilitation
WT/COMTD/W/57 WTO Secretariat 25 February 1999 Development Aspects of Trade
Facilitation
G/C/W/137 Switzerland 4 March 1999 Trade Fac ilitation
(Proposal for future WTO work)
G/C/W/138 European Communities 4 March 1999 Trade Fac ilitation and Electronic
Commerce
G/C/W/136
G/L/299
S/C/W/101IP/C/W/131European Communities 10 March 1999 Trade Facilitation in relation to existing
WTO Agreements
G/C/W/143
WT/COMTD/W/60European Communities 10 March 1999 Trade Facilitation in relation to
Development
G/VAL/W/32 WTO Secretariat 11 March 1999 Linkages between the Agreement on
Customs Valuation and TradeFacilitation
G/C/W/132/Rev.1 WTO Secretariat 29 March 1999 Background note
(Inventory of delegations’ suggestions)
G/C/W/146 Republic of Korea 6 April 1999 Revision of the Customs Act of Korea
for Trade Facilitation(National Experience Paper)
G/C/W/148 UNCTAD 8 April 1999 Trade Facilitation
(Overview of relevant UNCTADactivities)
G/C/W/149 WTO Secretariat 14 April 1999 Contributions received from other
WTO bodies
G/C/W/150 Republic of Korea 15 April 1999 Customs Administration and Trade
Facilitation(Proposal for future WTO work)
G/C/W/151 Japan 23 April 1999 Trade Facilitation – Proposal by Japan
G/C/W/152 Australia 4 May 1999 Role of Electronic Reporting in Trade
Facilitation
G/C/W/153 WTO Secretariat 12 May 1999 Factual Summary of the informal
meetings of the Council for Trade inGoods in September and December
1998 and April 1999
G/C/W/154 UN/ECE 8 June 1999 The UN/ECE CEFACT's Trade
Facilitation Work
__________