WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION
ORGANISATION MONDIALE DU COMMERCE
ORGANIZACIÓN MUNDIAL DEL COMERCIOIP/N/1/MDA/E/1
6 February 2002
(02-0568)
Council for Trade-Related Aspects of
Intellectual Property RightsOriginal:  English/
anglais/
inglés
MAIN DEDICATED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
LAWS AND REGULATIONS NOTIFIED UNDER
ARTICLE 63.2 OF THE AGREEMENT
MOLDOVA
The present document reproduces the text1 of the Law on Administrative Contention Nº 793-
XIV, as last modified in 2001, as notified by Moldova under Article 63.2 of the Agreement (see
document IP/N/1/MDA/1).
Conseil des aspects des droits de propriétéintellectuelle qui touchent au commerce
PRINCIPALES LOIS ET RÉGLEMENTATIONS CONSACRÉES À LA
PROPRIÉTÉ INTELLECTUELLE NOTIFIÉES AU TITRE
DE L'ARTICLE 63:2 DE L'ACCORD
MOLDOVA
Le présent document contient le texte
1 de la Loi n° 793-XIV sur le contentieux administratif,
modifiée pour la dernière fois en 2001, qui a été notifié par la Moldova au titre de l'article 63:2 de
l'Accord (voir le document IP/N/1/MDA/1).
Consejo de los Aspectos de los Derechos de PropiedadIntelectual relacionados con el Comercio
PRINCIPALES LEYES Y REGLAMENTOS DEDICADOS A LA
PROPIEDAD INTELECTUAL NOTIFICADOS EN VIRTUD
DEL PÁRRAFO 2 DEL ARTÍCULO 63 DEL ACUERDO
MOLDOVA
En el presente documento se reproduce el texto
1 de la Ley de lo Contencioso Administrativo
Nº 793-XIV, modificada en 2001, notificado por Moldova de conformidad con lo dispuesto en el
párrafo 2 del artículo 63 del Acuerdo (véase el documento IP/N/1/MDA/1).
                                                     
1 In English only.  The text in the original language is available for consultation by interested
Delegations at the WTO Secretariat./En anglais seulemen t.  Les délégations intéressées peuvent consulter le
texte, dans sa langue d'origine, au Secrétariat de l'OM C./En inglés solamente.  Las delegaciones interesadas
podrán consultar en la Secretaría de la OMC el texto en su idioma original.IP/N/1/MDA/E/1
Page 2
LAW
ON ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIM COURT
[ADMINISTRATIVE CONTENTION]2
No. 793-XIV
of February 10, 2000
The Parliament adopts this organic law.
CHAPTER I.  GENERAL PROVISIONS
Article 1. Purpose of the Administrative Claim Court
(1) The administrative claim court is a legal institution that aims at counteracting the abuses and
exceeding of authority by public authorities, defending the individual’s rights in the spirit of the law,
regulating the activities of public authorities, ensuring the law order.
(2) Any individual, whose legally recognized rights were injured by a public authority through an
administrative act or through failure to examine a petition on legal grounds can address to the
competent administrative claim court to obtain the cancellation of act, the recognition of claimed right
and the repairing of the caused damage.
Article 2. Definition of Terms
1. Within this Law, the below terms have the following meaning:
administrative claim court litigation  – this is a litigation liable to solving by the competent
administrative claim court, generated either by an administrative act, or by the failure to legally solve
a petition regarding recognition of a right recognized by law, where at least one person is a public
authority or employee of this authority;
types of administrative claim court – the appointed judges from the municipal and sector courts,
boards or commissions of the trial administrative contention, the board of administrative contention of
the Appeal Court, the board of the administrative contention of the Supreme Justice Court,
empowered by Law to conduct legal control of the legality of administrative acts issued by public
authorities with respect to the activity to conduct implementation and to implement the law, as well aspublic management;
public authority  – any organizational structure or authority founded by law or by a normative
administrative act that acts under a public power regime aiming at achieving a public interest.  Private
individual fulfilling a public function or using the public domain, who was entitled by law to render
public interest services shall be considered public authorities pursuant to this law;
administrative act  – individual or normative legal unilateral manifestation of the will, with a
normative or individual character, of a public author ity with respect to conducting the implementation
or implementing the law.  The administrative act, in the sense of this law, shall also be the
administrative contract, and likewise the failure to legally solve a petition;
                                                     
2 Translator's Note: There is no co nvenient translation of "contention" as used in this context, but it
refers to a type of claims court.IP/N/1/MDA/E/1
Page 3
administrative contract  – this is a contract concluded by the public authority for the advantage of
public power prerogatives, having as an object the administration and use of public owned property,
conducting works for public interest, render public services, the activity of public employees resulting
from the labor relations regulated by the legal status thereof;
administrative-jurisdictional  act – legal act issued by an administrative-jurisdictional authority with a
view to solving a conflict pursuant to a procedure set forth by law;
administrative-jurisdictional authority  – an administrative authority or a subdivision of an
administrative authority vested with legal tasks by law;
exclusively political act  – an act regarding the ratio between the Parliament, President and the
Government of the Republic of Moldova, acts to ap point to and dismiss from the exclusively political
public positions, likewise the statements, appeals, motions, messages, letters and other acts as such of
public authorities that do not create legal effects;
military commandment act  – an administrative act regarding the stri ct military issues of army force
activities;
failure to legally solve a petition  – refusal to receive a petition or the fact of not replying to the
petitioner within 30 days from the date of registration of the petition by the public authority in the
case the law does not provide otherwise;
individual whose rights were injured  – any physical or legal person  who considers that his legally
recognized rights were injured by a public authority, either through an administrative act or failure to
legally solve a petition;
preliminary petition  – a petition through which the issuing authorities or the superior hierarchical
body is requested to reexamine an administrative act with individual or normative character;
public service  -  public interest activity conducted or authorized by a public administration authority;
public employee  -  individual elected or appointed to a decision-making or executive position within
the structure of a public authority, likewise a private individual similar to a public authority in the
sense of this law;
public interest  – an interest defended by norms regulating the organization and functioning of public
institutions and other public individuals.
CHAPTER II
OBJECT AND SUBJECT OF
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTENTION (LITIGATION) ACTION
Article 3. Object of Suit in Administrative Claim Court
(1) The object of suit in administrative claim court shall constitute the normative and individual
administrative acts, through which an individual’s legally recognized right is injured, including the
right of the third party, issued by:
a) public authorities and assimilated authorities thereto pursuant to this law;
b) subdivisions of public authorities;IP/N/1/MDA/E/1
Page 4
c) employees of structures listed under let. a) and b).
(2) The object of suit in administrative claim court may be the failure to examine the petition,
within the terms set forth by the law, with respect to a legally recognized right.
Article 4. Acts Excused from Legal Control
The following cannot be attacked at the administrative claim court authority:
a) exclusively political acts of the Parliament, President and the Government of Moldova, as
well as administrative acts with individual nature, issued by the Parliament, the president of
the Republic of Moldova and the government in the cause of execution  of their functions
determined by the constitutional or legislative norms on the appointment, and dismissal from
governmental positions of state governmental officials, exponent of public interests  or of
very important public one;
b) diplomatic administrative acts with respect to external policy of Moldova;
c) laws, decrees of the President of the Republic of Moldova with normative nature, orders
(dispositions) and governmental decisions with normative nature, international treaties to
which the Republic of Moldova is a Member State that are subject to constitutional control;
d) military commandment acts;
e) administrative acts with respect to national security of Moldova when conducting the
exceptional state regime, urgency measures undertaken by public authority with a view to
combat natural calamities, fires, epidemics, epizootic and other phenomena as such;
f) administrative-jurisdictional acts about imposing penalty and other administrative acts
where the law provides another legal procedure for their cancellation or modification;
g) management acts issued by public authority, acting as a legal person, in connection
with the management and use of goods from private patrimony, including also collective
property;
h) administrative acts issued for the fulfillment of enforceable indisputable judgments.
(Article 4 was amended by the law No. 726-XV of December 7, 2001)
Article 5. Subjects Entitled to File Applic ations to the Administrative Claim Court
The following are the subjects entitled to file applications to the administrative claim court:
a) Individual, including the public employee, soldier or the individual with a military status,
who considers that his/her legally recognized rights were injured by a public authority
through an administrative act or through failure to legally solve the petition – pursuant to Art.
14 of the present Law;
b) Prefect, who attacks the acts issued by public authorities, including by those from the
autonomous territorial unit of Gagauzia and from Chisinau municipality – pursuant to the
Law on Local Public Administration;
c) Prosecutor that appeals the acts issued by the public authorities on the grounds of Article 5
of the Civil Procedure Code;IP/N/1/MDA/E/1
Page 5
d) Parliamentary attorney, who during the notification of the individual whose rights were
injured, attacks the administrative acts – pursuant to the Law on Parliamentary Attorneys;
e) Common law and specialized law courts questioning the legality of the administrative act-
pursuant to Article 13 of this Law;
f) other persons, according to the legislation in force.
(Article 5 was amended by the Law no. 726 –XV of December 7, 2001)
CHAPTER III
JURISDICTIONAL COMPETENCE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE
CLAIM COURT
Article 6. Jurisdictional Competence
(1) The competence of judging the actions within the administrative claim court belongs to:
(2) a) Sector and municipal courts
b) Trial Courts
c) Appeal Court
d) Supreme Court of Justice
(2) To adjudicate suits within the administrative claim court, specialized boards shall be created in
court, in Appeal Court and in the Supreme Court of Justice.
(3) In the trial courts where it is impossible to create administrative contention boards to examine
suits regarding the illegality of administrative ac ts, the chairman of the respective court shall create
the staff of administrative claim court or shall designate the judges.
(4) In the sector and municipal courts, the suits regarding the administrative acts illegality shall be
examined by judges designated by the chairman of the respective court.
Article 7. Judges’ Competence
Municipal and sector courts examine in the first instance suits regarding the illegality of the
administrative acts issued by public administration authorities of communes and villages, by public
employees thereof, and by private law persons of the corresponding level assimilated to the publicauthorities in the sense of this law.
Article 8. Trial Court’s Competence
The trial courts shall examine:
a) in the first instance – suits brought against illegal administrative acts issued by public
administration authorities of municipalities, cities and sectors, by judet (county) councils, by
the mayoralty primaria and council of Chisinau municipality, by prefects, by publicemployees of such authorities,  likewise by the private law persons of the corresponding levelIP/N/1/MDA/E/1
Page 6
assimilated into public authorities in the sense of this law, except for the suits that according
to law are attributed to the Appeal Court’s competence;
b) in an appeal procedure – appeals against the decision taken in the first instance by judges.
Article 9. Competence of the Appeal CourtThe Appeal Court adjudicates:
a) in the first instance – suits against illegal administrative acts issued by central public
administration authorities, by the Public Meeting of Gagauzia, against the Prefect’s orders,
against administrative acts issued by private law persons at the respective level assimilated
into public authorities in the sense of this law;
b) in an appeal procedure – appeals against the decision taken by the trial court.
Article 10. The Competence of the Supreme Court of Justice
The Supreme Court of Justice shall examine:
a) appeals against the decisions taken by the Appeal Court in the first instance;
b) actions for cancellation declared by the general Prosecutor of his deputies against the
absolute judgements;
c) law interest statements brought in by the Chairman of the Supreme Court of Justice and by
the General Prosecutor;
d) other actions attributed to its competence pursuant to the law.
(Article 10 was amended by the Law No. 726 –XV of December 12, 2001)
Article 11. Territorial Jurisdictional Competence
Suits on illegality of administrative acts shall be submitted to the sector or municipal court, either to
the court within the territorial jurisdiction the plaintiff’s or the defendant’s domicile is located.
Article 12. Competence Declines. Competence Conflict(1) If during the matter examination, the administrative claim court states that the dispute refers to the
competence of other court, then the administrative claim court shall decline its competence and shall
refer the matter to the competent court.
(2) If during the matter examination, the common court or the specialized court states that the dispute
refers to the competence of the administrative claim court, the respective court shall decline its
competence and refer the matter to the administrative claim court authority.
(3) When during matter examination the administrative claim court determines that one of the matters
refers to the competence of the common court ex cept for the cases when the damages are caused
during the issuance of the administrative act that was appealed against, the administrative claim court
shall issue a non-liable to appeal decision about the separation of the respective matter and passing
thereof to the competent court.IP/N/1/MDA/E/1
Page 7
(4) The competence conflict between the boards of administrative claim court of trial courts shall be
examined by the administrative claim court board of the Court of Appeal.
(5) The competence conflict between the board of the administrative claim court of the Court of
Appeal and other courts shall be examined by the board of the administrative claim court of the
Supreme Court of Justice.
Article 13. Correction of Illegality
(1) The legality of a unilateral administrative act may be examined any time within the framework of
the legal action based on common law, by way of correction, upon its own initiative or upon the
request of the interested party.
(2) The decision through which the correction of the illegality is brought into the administrative claim
court shall be issued pursuant to the provisions of the Civil Procedure Code.
(3) In the case when the court determines that th e resolution of litigation in essence depends upon the
administrative act, the court shall notify the competent administrative claim court authority based on a
motivated decision and shall suspend the matter.
(4) The administrative claim court authority shall examine the legality within ten days, issuing the
respective decision.
(5) The administrative claim court decision can be taken recourse against within 5 days.
(6) The recourse taken against the decision issued on legality shall be examined within 10 days.
(7) Upon examination of legality, the authority of th e administrative claim court passes the matter and
the decision to the court addressing thereto.
(Article 13 was amended by the law No. 726 –XV of December 7, 2001)
CHAPTER IV
SUIT EXAMINATION PROCEDURE IN THE
ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIM COURT
Article 14. Preliminary Petition
(1) The person who considers that his legally recognized rights were injured by an administrative act,
within six months from the date of learning of the act, may request through a preliminary petition, that
the public authority revoke entirely or partially the given act, if the law does not provide otherwise.
(2) In the case when the issuing body has a superior body, the preliminary petition can be addressed,
at the choice of the petitioner, to either the issuing body or the superior body.
(3) The period of 6 months mentioned under paragraph (1) does not apply to the normative
administrative act.IP/N/1/MDA/E/1
Page 8
Article 15. Procedure for Preliminary Petition Examination
(1) The preliminary petition shall be examined by th e issuing authority or by the superior body within
30 days from the date of its registration, the decision must be further communicated to the petitioner
immediately.
(2) The issuing authority shall be entitled to:
a) reject the preliminary petition;
b) admit the preliminary petition and as per the case may be, to revoke or modify the
administrative act.
(3) The hierarchical superior body is entitled to:
a) reject the preliminary petition;
b)  admit the preliminary petition and to entirely or partially cancel the administrative act, to
oblige the inferior hierarchical body to restore the respective person’s rights and as per the
case may be to revoke the administrative act issued upon its consent.
Article 16. Filing a Petition to Sue to the Administrative Claim Court
(1) The person, whose recognized by law rights were injured by an administrative act, and is not
content with the answer received to the preliminar y petition or failed to receive any answer in due
term provided by law, shall be entitled to petition the competent administrative claim court regarding
annulment, entirely or partially, of the respective act and repairing of the caused damage, including
the morale damage.
(2) The suit may be submitted directly to the administrative claim court in cases provided by law and
in cases where the person deems his/her rights being injured by failing to examine the preliminarypetition within the terms set forth by the law or by rejecting the preliminary petition about the
recognition of the claimed right and the repairing of the caused damage.
(3) When filing the petition to sue to the admi nistrative claim court the plaintiff shall be
exempted from paying the state tax.
(Article 16 was amended by the Law No. 726 –XV of December 12, 2001)
Article 17. Terms to Address to the Administrative Claim Court
(1) The petition through which the cancellation of an administrative act is requested or the recognition
of the claimed right shall be submitted within 30 days in the case the law does not provide otherwise.
The counting out of this period starts from:
a) the date of receiving the response to the preliminary petition or the expiry date of the term
provided by the law for examining thereof;
b) the date of communicating the refusal to examine the petition by which it is requested to
recognize the claimed right or the expiry date provided by the law to solve such a petition;
c) the date of communication of the administrative act, unless the law does not provide for the
preliminary procedure.IP/N/1/MDA/E/1
Page 9
(2) The Prefect and the Parliament attorney notifies the administrative claim court in due terms
provided by the organic laws with respect to preliminary procedure.
(3) Illegal normative administrative acts can be appealed any time.
(4) The term of 30 days specified in paragraph (1) is a statute of limitation.
(5) The person who missed out the statute of limitation for valid reasons can be restored according to
the procedure pursuant to the Civil Procedure Code.
Article 18. Statute of Limitation for Damages
(1)  In the case when the person, whose rights was injured claims for the cancellation of the
administrative act without claiming for the damages, the statute of limitation for the petition for
damages shall count out from the date the respective person learned or must have learned the size of
damage.
(2) In the case when the adjudication of damage was not requested simultaneously with the
cancellation of the administrative act, the claim for damages shall be addressed to the competent
common law court within the general statute of limitation provided by the Civil Code.
Article 19. The Form and Content of the Petition  to Sue to the Administrative Claim Court
(1) The petition to sue shall be submitted to the administrative claim court in written form upon the
terms provided by the Civil Procedure Code.
(2) When forwarding the petition to sue to the admi nistrative claim court the plaintiff simultaneously
shall submit the copy of the preliminary petition with a proof of sending or receiving by the respective
authority the contested administrative act or as per the case may be, the public authority response or
commentary to reject the preliminary petition.
Article 20. Bringing to Court of Public Employee
(1) The petition to sue can be applied as well against the public employee of the respective public
authority, which is the defendant who drafted th e contested administrative act or who refused to
examine the petition when damages are claimed.
(2) When the action is admitted the public empl oyee shall be obliged to compensate the damage
together with the respective public authority.
(3) The public employee who is sued in the court can call for co-responsibility his superior who
ordered him to draft the administrative act or to re fuse to solve the petition, who shall be involved in
the court examination as the third party.
Article 21. Suspension of the Contested Administrative Act Implementation1) The request to cease the implementation of the contested administrative act can be forwarded to the
administrative claim court simultaneously with the submission of the petition to sue.
2) In the presence of profoundly justified cases regarding the inevitability of damage and aiming at
avoiding such damage the administrative claim court can issue a decision to suspend the
implementation of the administrative act and on its own initiative.IP/N/1/MDA/E/1
Page 10
(Article 21 was amended by the Law No. 726 –XV of December 7, 2001)
Article 22. Judge’s Actions upon Receipt of Petition to Sue
(1) The judge takes a decision to receive for examination or to refuse the petition to sue within three
days from the date of its application in accordance with the Civil Procedure Code.
(2) When receiving for examining the petition to sue, the judge instructs:
a) on forwarding to the defendant the copy of the petition to sue and the copies of the annexes
attached to the petition;
b) submission by the defendant of the contested administrative act and the documentation on
the basis of which this act was issued, deeds and other data which the court deems necessary
for case examination;
(a) c) on summoning the parties on the day of the first appearance in court , which must
be set not later than 10 days  from the date of accepting the petition to sue.
(3) The defendant is bound to submit the requested documents in the first appearance in court;
otherwise, there shall be imposed a fine amountin g to 10 minimum salaries for each groundlessly
lapsed day.  Imposing the legal fine does not excuse the defendant from the duty to submit the
requested documents.
Article 23. Date of Petition to Sue Examination
(1) The administrative claim court can essentially  examine the case during the first appearance of
parties in court, if they declare being ready for court examination.
(2) In other cases, the court sets the date for case examination in essence within the reasonable terms,
if the organic law does not provide otherwise.
Article 24. Examination of the Petition to Sue
(1) The administrative claim court examines the petition to sue of the plaintiff and the defendant
and/or of their representatives according to the procedure set forth by the Civil Procedure Code, withsome exceptions provided by this Law.
(2) Failure of parties and/or representatives thereof to appear in court, without justified reasons, shall
not impede the petition examination.
(3) During the examination by the administrative claim court of the petition for annulment, the
presentation of proofs shall be imputed to the defendant, but in the matter of damages, presentation of
proofs shall be imposed upon both parties.
Article 25. Empowerment of the Administrative Claim Court
(1) Examining the petition to sue, the administrative  claim court issues one of the following decisions:
a) to reject the claim as groundless or being submitted violating thus the statute of limitation;
b) to accept the claim and to cancel the contested administrative act entirely or partially,
either to impute the defendant to issue the required administrative act by the plaintiff and toIP/N/1/MDA/E/1
Page 11
issue a reference, certificate, and any ot her excerpt, or to eliminate the committed
infringements, likewise to compensate the damage of the plaintiff in case when failing to duly
implement the decision of the administrative claim court.
(2) The administrative claim court, within its compet ence, is entitled to issue from its initiative or
upon request, the decision on legality of the administrative act or actions, on the basis of which thecontested administrative act has been issued.  In the cases, when the control upon the legality of such
acts and actions refers to the competence of the superior administrative court, the claim on
administrative act shall be performed by the respective court in conformity with this Law.
(3) When accepting the suit, the administrative claim court shall on the basis of the petition, issue a
decision with respect to the compensation of material and moral damage caused to the plaintiff by the
illegal administrative act or by the failure to examine the preliminary petition within the terms set
forth by the law.
(4) The size of the moral damage shall be set forth by the court irrespectively to the material damage,
depending on the caused moral or material sufferings, the circumstances and form under which the
damage was caused, on the gravity of the consequences, on the degree of defendant culpability as well
as other circumstances as such.
Article 26. Grounds for Contested Administrative Act Annulment
(1) The contested administrative act shall be annulled entirely or partially, if:
a) it is essentially illegal, having been issued in contradiction with the provisions of the Law;
b) it is illegal, having been issued infringing the competence;
c) it is illegal having been issued violating the set forth procedure.
(2) The administrative claim court is not competent to examine the suitability of administrative acts or
administrative operations that serve as a ground for issuance of the given act.
Article 27. Decision Issuance
The administrative claim court issues a decision in accordance with the procedure set forth by the
Civil Procedure Code.
Article 28. Decision Publication
(1) The decision of the administrative claim court on entirely or partially annulment of the illegal
administrative act, the enactment of which was cond itioned by the publication in an official source,
shall be published in the same source.  The decision may provide for another publication in which this
shall be further published.
(2) The costs for publishing the decision shall be covered as a rule by the defendant.  In case of
publishing from the plaintiff’s account upon the request thereof the covered costs shall be collected
from the defendant through the determination of the court dealing with the decision.
Article 29. Results of the Administrative Act Annulment(1) The administrative act, entirely or partially annulled shall cease having legal consequences from
the moment of entering into force of the administrative claim court decision.IP/N/1/MDA/E/1
Page 12
(2) Taking into account the concrete circumstances and the possibility for negative legal effects
emergence, the administrative claim court can set forth through its decision that the norms declared
null and void shall not have legal effects from the date of passing the administrative act.
Article 30. Appeal Procedure(1) The decision of the administrative claim court upon the adjudicated suit can essentially be taken
recourse against within 15 days from the date of issuance or from the date of integrally
communicating the decision, in the case where the parties were not present in the court during suit
examination, unless the Law does not provide otherwise.
(2) The appeal of court’s decision shall suspend its implementation.
(3) The petition to sue shall be examined in acco rdance with the procedure set forth by the Civil
Procedure Code.
(4) The enactment of administrative claim court’s decision shall be appealed by parties exceptionally
as provided by the Civil Procedure Code.
(Article 30 was amended by the Law No. 726 –XV of  December 7, 2001)
Article 31. Act of Execution
Coming into effect the administrative contention’s decision issued in accordance with this Law, shall
be considered as an act of execution.
Article 32. Execution of Decision(1) The administrative claim court authority which essentially have passed the decision within 3 days
from the date of entering into force thereof, shall send a copy of the defendant’s decision for
execution and another one to the common law authority of the defendant’s whereabouts for the
control of executing the decision and if needed for a forced execution thereof.
(2) The decision shall be executed in duly set fo rth time and in case of no indication as such then
within not more than 30 days from the date of entering into force of the decision.
(3) In case of failure to execute the decision in due time, the public administration manager which
task includes the execution shall be prosecuted according to the provisions of the legislation in force.
(Article 32 was amended by the Law No. 726 –XV of December 7, 2001)
Article 33. Regressive Petition
The public administration manager shall submit the common law authority a regressive petition
against the culpable public employee due to the failure to execute the decision of the administrative
claim court decision.
CHAPTER V
FINAL AND TRANSITIONAL DISPOSITIONS
Article 34.
(1) This Law’s provisions shall be supplemented with the provisions of the Civil Procedure Code.IP/N/1/MDA/E/1
Page 13
(2) The person whose right was injured by an effective administrative act issued before the entering
into force of this Law is in right to request from the issuing thereto public administration authority or
the superior authority thereof the examination of th e respective act pursuant to the provisions of this
Law.
(3) This Law shall come into force upon expiring of 3 months from the date of its publication.(4) Upon the date of entering into force of this Law the Chapters 22 to 25 of the Civil Procedure Code
shall be abrogated likewise any other provision thereto contradicting this Law.
(5) Actions accepted for examination in the court on the date of becoming effective of this Law shall
be examined pursuant to the norms enforced as of the day of addressing to court.
(6) Until the moment of creating the boards of administrative claim court under the Trial Courts,
Appeal Courts and Supreme Justice Court, the suits under the competence of administrative claim
court shall be examined by the composition of the administrative contention appointed by therespective Court’s President.
 (7) The Government:
shall draft and submit the Parliament proposals to adjust the effective legislation to this Law;
             shall bring the own normative acts into consistence with this Law.
Chairman of the Parliament                                                                      Dumitru Diacov
No. 793-XIV
February 10, 2000
Chisinau
__________