section_path: Related case
section_name: Related case
paragraph_text: Related case
  
  Daniel Lozano-Camargo is a Venezuelan man who was also wrongfully deported to El Salvador and taken to CECOT. Lozano-Camargo arrived in the US as a minor and was seeking asylum, and he was covered by a binding settlement agreement that prohibited him from being deported until his asylum case was adjudicated. His case was assigned to Judge Stephanie Gallagher, who ordered the Trump administration to facilitate Lozano-Camargo's return, explaining that "acilitation includes, but is not limited to, a good faith request" from the administration to the Salvadoran government, asking for his return. The DOJ had attempted to convince Gallagher that the settlement agreement was no longer in effect, alleging that Lozano-Camargo is a member of Tren de Aragua and therefore not eligible for asylum, but she rejected that argument, as the DOJ presented no evidence of gang membership. The DOJ then appealed to the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, asking it to stay Gallagher's decision while the case was appealed, but the court denied their request. Lozano-Camargo's case is part of J.O.P. v. Department of Homeland Security.
  
  Daniel Lozano-Camargo is a Venezuelan man who was also wrongfully deported to El Salvador and taken to CECOT. Lozano-Camargo arrived in the US as a minor and was seeking asylum, and he was covered by a binding settlement agreement that prohibited him from being deported until his asylum case was adjudicated. His case was assigned to Judge Stephanie Gallagher, who ordered the Trump administration to facilitate Lozano-Camargo's return, explaining that "acilitation includes, but is not limited to, a good faith request" from the administration to the Salvadoran government, asking for his return. The DOJ had attempted to convince Gallagher that the settlement agreement was no longer in effect, alleging that Lozano-Camargo is a member of Tren de Aragua and therefore not eligible for asylum, but she rejected that argument, as the DOJ presented no evidence of gang membership. The DOJ then appealed to the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, asking it to stay Gallagher's decision while the case was appealed, but the court denied their request. Lozano-Camargo's case is part of J.O.P. v. Department of Homeland Security.