section_path: History/Modern development of genetics and heredity
section_name: Modern development of genetics and heredity
paragraph_text: Modern development of genetics and heredity
  
  In the 1930s, work by Fisher and others resulted in a combination of Mendelian and biometric schools into the modern evolutionary synthesis. The modern synthesis bridged the gap between experimental geneticists and naturalists; and between both and palaeontologists, stating that:
  
  The idea that speciation occurs after populations are reproductively isolated has been much debated. In plants, polyploidy must be included in any view of speciation. Formulations such as 'evolution consists primarily of changes in the frequencies of alleles between one generation and another' were proposed rather later. The traditional view is that developmental biology (' evo-devo ') played little part in the synthesis, but an account of Gavin de Beer 's work by Stephen Jay Gould suggests he may be an exception.
  
  Almost all aspects of the synthesis have been challenged at times, with varying degrees of success. There is no doubt, however, that the synthesis was a great landmark in evolutionary biology. It cleared up many confusions, and was directly responsible for stimulating a great deal of research in the post- World War II era.
  
  Trofim Lysenko however caused a backlash of what is now called Lysenkoism in the Soviet Union when he emphasised Lamarckian ideas on the inheritance of acquired traits. This movement affected agricultural research and led to food shortages in the 1960s and seriously affected the USSR.
  
  There is growing evidence that there is transgenerational inheritance of epigenetic changes in humans and other animals.