text: UNITED NATIONS GeneralAssembly@Distr. GENERAL ^/40/r04012 Dec ember 1985 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH Fortielh s ess ion Agenda iLens 106 and 116 INTERNATIONAL CAMPAIGN AGAINST TRAFFIC IN DRUGS PROPOSED PROGRAMI{E BUDGET FOR THE BIENNIUM 1986'1987 prograrnme budget inplicatioris of draft resotution IIL r ecommended I Report of the Fifth Commitlee Rapporteur: Mr. FaIk MELTKE (Gernan Democratic nepublic) 1. At its 6lst meeting, on 12 Decernber 1985, the Fifth Corunittee, pursuant to rule I53 of the rules of procedure of the Generat Assenbly, considered the statenent by the Secr etary -General lA/C.5/40/8O\ on the programne budget inplications of draft .""t1utio., rrr recommendect by lhe Third cornnittee in paragraph 15 of its reporE (A/4o/984) anal the related report of lhe Advisory coffnittee on Administralive and Budqetary Queseions lA/4O/7/Ldd'L7\ ' 2. statenents and connents nade in the course of the comr.ittee's consideralion of this iten are refLected in the relevant sunmary record (A,/c.5/40/SR.6I) . DECISION OF THE FIFTH COMMITTEE 3. The Fifth Conmittee decided, without objection, to inform the General Assembly that, should it attopt draft resolution III recommended by the Third cornnittee in paragraph 15 of its reporE (A/40/984) ' additional appropr iations totallinq $983'800 would be required under the progranme budget for the biennium 1986-1987, apportioned as follows: 85-3?603 0350P (E)A/40/r040 English SecCion Lsection 6 Section 8section l0 Section Ilsection 12 Secti.on 13 sect.ion 14 Section 26 4. An additional anount of 9215,600 would also be reguired under section 3l(Staff assessment), to be offset by an increase in the sane amount under inconeseclion l- (fncome from staff assessnen!).
analysis: This text appears to be discussing the budget and financial implications of a resolution related to drug trafficking. The resolution is recommended by the Third Committee and requires additional appropriations under the program budget for the biennium 1986-1987. The text does not provide specific details about the resolution itself, but rather focuses on the financial implications of its adoption.