text: the case, but only from outside the United Kingdom, except in certain limited circumstances (see para. 19^ below). An illegal entrant is, by definition, a person to whom an immigration officer would have been bound to refuse entry had the full facts been known at the time entry was obtained, and it is therefore right that his right of appeal should be on a par with that for persons who have been refused leave to enter the United Kingdom. Illegal entrants may, however, seek judicial review of an immigration officer's decision to treat them as such. 19A. Where a person is an illegal entrant by virtue of entering in breach of a deportation order, he or she may appeal while they remain in the United Kingdom on the ground that they are not the person named in that order. 195. In considering whether an illegal entrant should be removed, immigration officers take all relevant factors, including compassionate circumstances, into account before reaching a decision. The number of persons removed under illegal entry powers in 1988 results from the procedural changes set out in paragraph 189 above, which allowed a greater number of illegal entrants, including overstayers and others in breach of their conditions of entry, to be dealt with. Removal under illegal entry powers 1SS4 MI 12S8 Number of illegal entrants removed or who left the United Kingdom voluntarily 1 1^2 1 566 2 196 CCPR/C/58/Add.6 page 45 Asylum 196. The United Kingdom fully meets its obligations under the 1951 United Nations Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and the 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees and gives asylum to those with a well-founded fear of persecution. The number of applicants has increased fivefold in the last 10 years, although the proportion of successful 
analysis: The text appears to be related to immigration and asylum policies in the United Kingdom, discussing the treatment of illegal entrants, their rights to appeal, and the procedures for removal. It also mentions the number of asylum seekers and the country's obligations under international refugee conventions. Given the focus on immigration and asylum, it is likely that the text falls under the categories related to human rights and humanitarian aid.