text: assumed lhat the financial resources freed from the defence burden eouLd be used to increase domestic capllal investment. Ehis Ecenario is found to be very poHerful in raising the GDP groltth ratea of developing countries (i.e. by 0'72 percentage points, compared with the baseline projectlons for 1985-1990), wbile increasing the corresponding GDP growth rates of the aleveloped countries (by 0.13 Percentage points ) .0,o€ ,'tO.{ 'd.9 q.a6 ,.r gqlqo {rr.xoo{r!oo oFo laJcrnizE]JI{lEPO a.t3dAOr.!rJ{6 rr.{ ooi o+JI.di {..d.Ortl {, t'r{rja'{ (l|.. rl{,<oo.c.l .1, O()t.JI 98o.|..'El .r.acruc,(|Ca{lo.-lc''.r or r,EOO d rJr C' to,_Q I Oirrr. qr.-l {, Or,-ro lJ tlqqo { t58 .. 98i.rEc{i }J {drlocn t gCt O {r..|.tt r. IlLtu or 60.P Or tJ ..1c! o ol-l lJ ,l I Fe ooEg E ',O'a o oc+J O O Or.ea o oH. 'r oE P C rt,ro c qlE.r O OO q..! e .l >0, t! I r.eQ.-a { 4t ra a cotE > Or.iird E 3.(I|-r.tg a!rto8le ;r br: E{ 'lOi!sEl!\gFGltr.lFr0€ sl u) r\ N OC-{F{-{Nq|:-{€Fsl 4r'rNc{€oF@ ooooooo .l(n !t€ < Ot OOF{.{da{9lY|.Nl|tt.\:\|.,l|-lOFOln!t O€'OOO-{O +<h \o (!| F to CtO.{-{-{(\1 o o oo o oO<NO-{uiFGIOCOOCT-l oooo€oorltlN'nO€NGlI?IC{-IFOCIF OOOOO.Ig F + 90 ++ 6!l |/1 +++ rla rt <t++++ trt ('t {rt Ft cl+++++ ++++++ rl t$ I { dnoo€&3eb.,vlBEa!>r s H : B ; Fqg ! d fi g; E; E i i E8 sF 9 E ; Ea E!|!r.ria:.:...!oeOE s & : b; d ! d F ft l.i' .1i E 'i t g #3 € u, { o -, cc i Pl I E i ; E $; ; EIE i E E E IB ; gIi s i s ; gi $ 4fl H s E E Eg i frlii;.';i *Eio .0c (1,I^/\o/5r9Engliah Page Il. oo{l{o €t tlolnrrclqto-{ oo cro ! 5U *rO ',r e o{tE|c -lO
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the economic implications of reducing defense spending and reallocating those resources towards domestic capital investment. It mentions GDP growth rates and percentage points, which suggests an economic development focus. The language used is technical and economic in nature, with no apparent references to natural resources, agriculture, forestry, fishing, health, education, employment, humanitarian aid, culture, or science and technology.