text: resolutions, based on ulterior motives, were irrelevant and that once that political game had been brought to a halt, the Islamic Republic of Iran would adopt a positive and constructive attitude. 44. Following extensive efforts by the Commission and his Government, full co-operation had been extended to the Special Representative of the Commission, and he had made his first visit to the Islamic Republic of Iran. His Government had formally asked for an extension of that visit but Mr. Galindo Pohl had not been able to comply with that request, due to constraints of time. In his report he had ruled out many allegations that had been repeatedly levelled against governmental and other dignitaries of the Islamic Republic of Iran, including the fact that political prisoners had been executed under false charges of drug-trafficking. Surprisingly enough, he had also met people whose names had been given by terrorist groups as executed political prisoners. On the basis of his report a consensus resolution had been adopted for the first time by the Commission on Human Rights at its forty-sixth session. E/CN.4/Sub.2/1990/SR.34 page 7 45. His Government was in the process of finalizing Mr. Galindo Pohl's second visit during which he wished to look into some detailed allegations. His Government had also invited the International Committee of the Red Cross to visit prisons in accordance with his recommendation. The spirit of co-operation was valuable and promising. Amid all those positive developments his delegation regretted that the Sub-Commission, influenced by misleading and false allegations from terrorist groups, still wished to insist on unfounded accusations. 46. The tone and language of the draft resolution ran counter to the goals and objectives of the Commission on Human Rights on the same subject and the Islamic Republic of Iran would not be responsible for any consequent adverse 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the political and human rights situation in the Islamic Republic of Iran, specifically in relation to the Commission on Human Rights and its sub-commission. The language used suggests that the text is focused on the political and diplomatic efforts of the government and the Commission to address allegations of human rights abuses.