text: tially on marxism-lcniniem. Despite the important post they fill after the training, they are not entirely trustworthy since even minor sentence written by them must have the approval of a Vietnamese advisor.” G/ 11. All the provinces of Kampuchea have been tvinned vith Vietnamese provinces in order to control the natural resources of Kampuchea and disposess the Kampuchean people, “This technique allows the Vietnamese to reap the full benefit of the national resources of Kampuchea under the umbrella of the so-called “shining solidarity bttween Vietnam and Kampuchea”, since the twin- ning process imposes all kinds of accompanying obligations upon the Khmer people. ” &/ “It is not a corncidence that the rich province of Battambang is coupled with the over-populated region of Qua-Nsm/Danang. Indeed, a good part of rice from this Khmer province is sent to Vietnam in order , the au- thorities said, to help the inhabitants of Qua-Nam/Danang to live.‘( z/ 12. “In the early eighteenth century, when the Vietnamese bcctune the masters of Csmbodia, they applied themselves in every possible way to destroying its culture and obliterating its past; they razed the Bhuddist tecPlos of the Lesser Vehicle and replaced them with their pagodas of the Greater Vehin le. They even changed the colour of the robe worn by the bonzes. Cambodiac officials had to wear the costume of the mandarins of the Court of Hug. The army occupied even the smallest villages, and the soldiers took Cembodiah xoreT; as their wives and concubines. As they do now...W Jean Larteguy adds, “Fzr them conquest meant, yesterday as today, the death of Cambodia and tote1 Viethsmizaticn. In 1992 they only have to take more precautions than was necnssary 1 , A4 M ‘r ‘alC,. ,‘I g/ Q/ Eeerie Alexandrine Martin, op.cit. p. 185 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the relationship between Vietnam and Kampuchea (Cambodia), specifically highlighting the alleged exploitation of Kampuchea's natural resources and the cultural impact of Vietnamese rule. The text mentions the twinning of provinces, control of resources, and the imposition of obligations on the Khmer people. It also references historical instances of Vietnamese destruction of Cambodian culture and traditions.