text: of the Plan of Partition with Economic Union between a Jewish State on the one hand and a Palestinian Arab State dl the other, and its impbementation, with reyaki CG the future Governnmnt of Patestine. According to the Plan of Partition with Economic OnFar in reaolutim 181 (II), the arm?d forces of the mandatory Power for Palestine were to complete their withdrawal as soon as possible, but in any case Jw35 s/w.2923 157 (Mr. Bagbeni Adeito Nzengeya, Zaire) not later than 1 August 1948, in order to ensure the evacuation of an area situated in the territory of the Jewish State, including a seaport and hinterland adequate to provide Eacilities for a substantial immigration. It was ossuned that the inapendent Arab and Jewish States would CCBUEZ into existence in Palestine two months after the evacuation of the armed forces of the mandatory Power had been completed, but in any case not later than 1 Dctober 1948. Resolutim 181 (If) was very precise in invi tfng the United Nations Commission for Palestine - composed of Bolivia, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Panama and the Philippines - upon its arrival in Palestine to proceed to carry out measures for the establishment of the frontiers of the Arab and Jewish States in accordance with the general lines of the reconanendations of the General AssaiiLbly on the partition of Palestine. As we see, the Security Council possesses legal instrulPents capable of revitalizing the prQCQSS of creating a Palestinian Arab State in accordance with the provisions of that resolution. Forty-one mars will socyl have elapsed without the Unilsd Nations having overcome the rivalries and the intransigence th&t have been encountered in the implementation of resolution 181 (LX). Paragraph 5 of Security Council tesolution 605 (19671 stresses the urgent need to teach a just, durable and peaceful 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing a historical event related to the creation of a Palestinian Arab State and a Jewish State, and the implementation of a plan for the partition of Palestine. The language used is formal and official, suggesting a diplomatic or international context. The text mentions the United Nations, the Security Council, and resolutions, which further supports this interpretation.