text: can Administration is trying to protect and market in the United States and in other places-1 would merely quote the Israeli journalist, Danny Rubinstein, who wrote in 2% New York Zmes of 16 July 1985: “The truth is that there is no consensus on the funda- mental question facing Israel today: whether we are willing to sacrifice democracy for the sake of holding on to the territories. The national consensus for condemn- ing Rabbi Kahane and teaching democratic values merely allows us to evade this more difftcult issue. “Meanwhile, daily life in Israel teaches just the oppo- site of democratic values. The 1.5 million Arabs in the territories have been living under Israeli occupation for 18 years-living alongside Israelis without sharing their rights. Our young people have grown up believing that nationalist struggle, terrorism and lawful discrimination are facts of life. Under such circumstances, how can one hope to teach democracy?“* The same journalist revealed the racist prejudice in Israel against Arabs by recounting an incident that occurred dur- ing the strike of the stevedores in Israel: “Several years ago, during a crackdown on a steve- dore strike, the leader of the striking union appeared on television and criticized the police. ‘How dare they treat us like this. ,Are we Arabs from the territories?“** 63. There is a un&sally recognized principle according to which occupation in itself is an act of aggression, in addition to its being a blatant violation of human and national rights in occupied territories. Therefore, whatever is taking place under the Zionist settler occupation must be seen through the inevitability of this oppression, which is in fact the reactor, the dynamo that moves the instincts of the racist society that is built on hatred of its victim. There- fore, an unconditional, speedy end must be put to the 
analysis: The text discusses the Israeli occupation of territories and the impact it has on the rights of the Arab population, including the lack of democratic values and the prevalence of racism. The text also touches on the notion of occupation as an act of aggression and the need for an unconditional end to the occupation. Given the political and social context of the text, it is likely that the topic is related to human rights, political issues, or international relations.