text: 92. The South African authorities have for a long time occupied Namibia, using it as a springboard for the carry- ing out of repeated acts of aggression and .destabilization against Angola, causing the Angolan people to suffer very serious losses in life and property. 93. On 16 September, South Africa once again dis- patched troops to invade Angola, thus grossly trampling on the norms of international relations. This constituted a new threat to the peace and security of southern Africa as a whole. It was both necessary and timely for the Council to hold an emergency meeting to deliberate on this emer- gency situation. 94. The South African authorities, on the pretext of safe- guarding their security, wilfully carry out aggression against their neighbouring countries. At the same time, South Africa claims that it is ready for peaceful talks. It accuses the African front-line States and national libera- tion organizations of disrupting the peace in this area. However, over the years its record on internal suppression and external expansion fully demonstrates that it is pre-. cisely the perverse acts of the South African racist regime that cause turmoil in the region of southern Africa. 95. The new acts of aggression committed by South Africa against Angola further demonstrate that, contrary to what it claims, South Africa has no intention of solving the problems of southern Africa through peaceful talks. It tries to use its armed forces to intimidate the weak and to violate the independence, sovereignty and territorial integ- rity of the neighbouring countries. 96. At a time when the Conference at Luanda of Foreign Ministers of Non-Aligned Countries had come to a close, when the fortieth session of the General Assembly was about to begin and when more and more countries in the world were condemning the South African authorities for 
analysis: The text appears to be a diplomatic statement or resolution from the United Nations, condemning the actions of South Africa towards Namibia and Angola. The language used is formal and accusatory, indicating that the topic is likely a matter of international relations and conflict. The text does not mention economic development, natural resources, or environmental issues, but rather focuses on the political and military actions of South Africa.