text: zation in connection with decolonization. From this point of view, it is unacceptable for an attempt to be made to justify ruthless aggression by alleging adher- ence to the principle of the rule of law. 78. This principle cannot be used to justify an injustice backed up by the USC of force, in accordance with colonial practices. That is why we have insisted that this problem must be fully analysed, taking into account the historical, geographic, political and ethical background, since if that is not done legal principle will be stripped of its fairness and reduced to the law of empire. in the twentieth century, to cover all colo- nialist abuses. 79. While all these events were taking place, an intense effort to find peace was being carried out by the Secretary-General. In that process. once again Argentina’s willingness to be flexible about its position in order to find a peaceful solution to the problem and to save hundreds of innocent lives was very clear. Argentina tailored its conduct to the lines set forth by the International Court of Justice in this connection; in other words, it acted diligently to find a way to reconcile positions so that negotiations would be meaningful nnd not become a mere exercise in intran- sigence. II -- . 80. However. once again this effort ran up against the inflexible arrogance of the British Government. What the British Government is seeking is the resto- ration by force of its colonial title in South America. It is an exercise in imperial doctrines which are self- perpetuating. If we follow this logic. violent occupn- tion dragged out for 150 years cannot hope to be reimposed except by war. 81. The same British attitude to the just and con- tinuing claim of Argentina is not unrelated to the origins 
analysis: The text appears to be a political statement or diplomatic document discussing a conflict between Argentina and the British Government over a territorial dispute. The language used is formal and official, with references to international law, the United Nations, and the International Court of Justice. The text does not mention specific economic or environmental issues, but rather focuses on the principles of sovereignty, self-determination, and the rule of law.