text: On 31 May 1989, the Applicant filed with the Tribunal th e application referred to above in the "second case". Whereas, in the "first case", the Applicant's principa l contentions are: 1.The Respondent was legally required to submit the form s attesting to the Applicant's separation from service to the Pensio n Fund pursuant to the applicable Regulations and Rules. 2.The Applicant is entitled to receive interest on hi s withdrawal settlement. 3.The Applicant is entitled to d amages for the material and moral injuries suffered by him as a direct consequence of th e Respondent's arbitrary and capricious actions following his force d separation from the Organization. 4.The Applicant is entitled to appropriate and adequat e compensation for unreasonable delays in the JAB procedures ,- 15 - constituting a "denial of justice". 5.The Applicant is entitled to compensation and emoluments because the Organization's records show that he continued in it s employ after his purported dismissal. Whereas, in the "second case", the Applicant's principa l contentions are: 1.The Respondent violated the Ap plicant's fundamental right to due process of law, fair play and impartiality in th e administration of justice. 2.The Respondent attempted in vain to prosecute th e Applicant on alleged criminal charges. 3.The Respondent failed to revie w the Applicant's appeal to the JAB fairly, independently and impartially pursuant to th e applicable Regulations and Rules. 4.The JAB failed to review the Applicant's appeal fairly , independently and impartially pursuant to the applicable Regulations and Rules. 5.The Respondent failed to estab lish that the Applicant had a patent intent to commit the alleged irregularities justifying hi s summary dismissal from the service of the Organization. 6.The Applicant is entitled to compensation for unreasonabl e delays in the JAB procedures, causing a "denial of justice".
analysis: The text appears to be a legal document related to a labor dispute, specifically a case filed with a tribunal. The contentions made by the applicant involve issues of employment, compensation, and due process, which suggests a focus on employment and labor rights.