text: different technologically advanced countries, or whether for ideological reasons, the long-term results were inevitably disastrous, with the destruction of human rights and democracy, as in the case of Afghanistan, Cambodia and South Korea -and possibly in that of India's intervention in Sri Lanka. Even if intervention was short, sharp and in a small country, there were still bad consequences: breaches of international law and a bad example set to other States, as in the case of Grenada and Panama. 21. When the cause of the intervention was territorial aggrandizement, the problems did not disappear, even with a temporary victory. Conquerors knew that the victims would rise up against them for generations - a point made by Mr. Khalifa in 1989 in respect of Israel, the occupied territories and the intifada. The observer for Israel that morning had made some logical points about the situation of a country effectively at war with its neighbours and their allies, other than Egypt, but there was no doubt that excessive force had been used by military and police in suppressing disorders within Israel and the occupied territories. Moreover, there was long-standing discrimination against Arab Israeli citizens. It was for such reasons that the settlement of Russian immigrants, even inside Israel's boundary, especially in Galilee, was of grave concern. There were rightful Arab owners of those lands, who were either internal refugees or had fled to Arab countries, and it was wrong to bring in Russian settlers or to allow those lands to be settled by other Jewish Israelis through the intermediary of the Jewish National Fund, to the detriment of the true owners of the land. That was in fact demographic manipulation, even within the boundaries of an existing State, and it must be condemned. 22. Invasions and occupations had taken place after the establishment of the 
analysis: The text discusses the consequences of military interventions and occupations, highlighting the negative impact on human rights, democracy, and the rights of indigenous people. It also touches on issues of territorial aggrandizement, occupation, and demographic manipulation. Given the focus on international relations, state sovereignty, and human rights, it is likely that the text falls under a category related to international relations or politics.