text: battlefield where the occupying Israeli Power unleashes bloody mamacres against the unarmed Arab population, violates their every h-n right, destroys their houses, and kills their children and women in a prelasditated manner. The Security Council rmat see matters clearly and should not be waylaid by confusion concerning the deeire of the Tel Aviv government for peace. Israel’s policy was and is based on a rejection of Water because peace hinders its expansionist objectives and because Ierael would prefer to have the land without fta population and to realize the dream of a @Grater Jewieh State” - Eretz Israel - fraa the Nile to the Euphrates. We recall in particular Israel’s rejection of the role of the United Nations ma 1 ts resolutiono. The General Aoae&ly and the Security Council have adopted *,mPCN*m rnarrl ,.C4AII -A.m..-.2 -- Eera& ..-----e --u--“---a*‘” &s.j”“oL+,,y k mmpiy fuiiy wiicir the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the Protecticm of Civilian Pereorre in Tima of War, of 12 August 1949. We should like to recall General Assembly resolution 2252 (B-V) of $ July 1967 and Security Council reaolutione 237 (1967) of 14 June 1967 and JR/36 s /PV. 292 3 163-165 (Hr. AL-Hasri, Syrian _Arab Remblic) 465 (1980) of 1 Mar& 1980, which were a&ptea manimouay. We should al60 l&e to W&l Security Council resolutions 605 (1987), 607 (1966) and 606 (19861, adopted as a result of the heroic Palest’nian intifadah against the Israeli occupation, in which the Council reaffirmed that the Fourth Geneva Convention ia applicable to Palestinian and other Arab territories and strongly requested Israel, the O-Wing Rcwer, to abide by its cbliqations arising from the C,avention. The Council also to& into account the need to consider measures for the impartial protection of the Palestinian civilians under occupation and considered that the current policies and 
analysis: The text appears to be a political statement condemning the actions of the Israeli government towards the Arab population, citing violations of human rights, destruction of homes, and killings. The language used is strongly critical and references international law and resolutions. The text does not mention any specific economic, environmental, or scientific issues, but rather focuses on the political and humanitarian aspects of the conflict.