text: that her impression of the United Nations is that of an organization in which everyone speaks but nobody listens. Therefore I should be very grateful to those who would care to listen to what I may have to say. I request them to give some attention to a somewhat new approach to the problem of disarmament. This approach is that the Security Council must become involved in disarmament. The Security Council has never entered into disarmament matters; nor has it ever held a session with regard to disarmament. Yet the Charter specifically provides, in Article 26, that the Security Council .should be involved in disarmament. Why in all these years has the security Council never taken up the question of disarmament? Do its members feel that disarmament is something they do not care about or is it that they think the Council can do nothing about it? For what reason is Article 26 of the Charter violated by the Security Council's never having entered into the question of disarmament? That is a question that should be addressed by the General Assembly to the Security Council. JVM/14 A/C.l/40/PV.S 56 (Mr. Rossides, cyprus) As you have pointed out, Mr. Chairman, in your statement, there has never been any real disarmament. There is much economic interest in the arms race. The real problem is halting the arms race, and it is our view that there is such economic interest in continuing the arms race that whatever we do we cannot overcome this great interest in the arms race, the dealing in armaments, the great economic business of armaments. How can we ignore all that and say that we decide that there should be disarmament? Disarmament in itself is a negative concept. There is nothing positive about 
analysis: The text discusses the issue of disarmament and the role of the United Nations Security Council in addressing it. The speaker highlights the contradiction between the Charter's provision for the Security Council's involvement in disarmament and the Council's actual lack of engagement with the issue. The text also touches on the economic interests behind the arms race, suggesting that these interests may be a significant obstacle to disarmament. This focus on the international relations and global governance aspects of disarmament suggests that the category is likely to be related to international cooperation and diplomacy.