text: 59. At the request of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a roll-call vote was taken on operative paragraph 1 of draft resolution B (E/CN.4/1990/L.6). 60. Operative paragraph 1 was adopted by 43 votes to none. The voting was as follows: -183-In favour; Argentina, Bangladesh, Belgium, Botswana, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Colombia, Cuba, Cyprus, Ethiopia, France, Gambia, Germany, Federal Republic of, Ghana, Hungary, India, Iraq, Italy, Japan, Madagascar, Mexico, Morocco, Nigeria, Pakistan, Panama, Peru, Philippines, Portugal, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, Somalia, Spain, Sri Lanka, Swaziland, Sweden, Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, Union ofSoviet Socialist Republics, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United States of America, Venezuela, Yugoslavia. Against: None. Abstaining; None. 61. The representative of the United States of America requested a vote on operative paragraph 2 of draft resolution B. 62. A statement in explanation of vote before the vote was made by the representative of the United States of America. 63. Operative paragraph 2 was adopted by 32 votes to 10, with 1 abstention. 64. At the request of the representative of Cuba, a roll-call vote was taken on draft resolution B as a whole, which was adopted by 32 votes to 1, with 10 abstentions. The voting was as follows; In favour; Argentina, Bangladesh, Botswana, Brazil, Bulgaria, China, Colombia, Cuba, Cyprus, Ethiopia, Gambia, Ghana, Hungary, India, Iraq, Madagascar, Mexico, Morocco, Nigeria, Pakistan, Panama, Peru, Philippines, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, Somalia, Sri Lanka, Swaziland, Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, Venezuela, Yugoslavia. Against; United States of America. Abstaining; Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Federal Republic of, Italy, Japan, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. 65. Statements in explanation of vote after the vote on resolutions 1990/2 A and B were made by the representatives of Canada, Peru and the United Kingdom
analysis: The text appears to be discussing a vote on a draft resolution in the United Nations, which suggests that it may be related to a topic of international cooperation or global governance. The fact that the resolution is titled "B" and the vote is on operative paragraphs 1 and 2, as well as the resolution as a whole, implies that it may be a comprehensive document covering a range of issues. Given the absence of specific details about the content of the resolution, it is difficult to pinpoint a single category that best fits the text.