text: receipt of the cable. There '"as no need for members to report to the Sub-Commission on their visits to Iraq because the decision whether to accept or not had been an individual one. It had not been a fact-finding visit. Hi£ impressions were his own and he was under no obligation to report to the Sub-Commission. Bow he used the information he had gathered was a matter to decide for himself. 58. Mr. JOINET said that with a view to the vote on resolutions under agenda i tern 6, which once again concE~rned a "sensitive" issue, he formally requested. in accordance with rule 78 of the rules of procedure, which stipulates a minimum of 24 hours in advancE~, that the Sub-Commission should temporarily suspend rule 59 of the rules of procedure, with the express purpose of enhancing the independence of the experts, regard being had to the sensitive nature of those resolutions, such suspension being limited to the period required to vote on the draft resolutions under agenda item 6 during the present session. 59. Mr. GUISSE, speaking on a point of order, said that he was one of the members of the Sub-Commission who had been to Iraq. Be would like to give an account of his visit and also to raise certain problems he had encountered at the following meeting. The meeting rose at 6 p.m. 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing a meeting of a UN Sub-Commission, where members are discussing their visits to Iraq and the voting on draft resolutions related to a sensitive issue. The tone is formal and procedural, suggesting a focus on international relations and diplomatic matters rather than economic or scientific issues.