text: (c) the enployee ras neither a national nor a habitual resident of Ehe Stateof the forun at the tire when the conBract of ernployruent was concludedt r (d) the enployee is a national of the enployer State at the tine theproceeding is inEt,itutedlA/40/447 English Page 19 (e) the enployee and the enployer State have otherwise agreed in writing,subject to any eonsiderations of public policy conferring on Ehe courts of theState of the forum exclusive jurisdiction Uy i""son of-the subject-matter of theproceeding. Artiite 1,4 Personal iniuries and danaqe to oropertv Unless otherwise agreed between the SEales concerned, a SEaEe cannot, invokeinnunity fron the jurisdiction of the courts of another Slate in respect ofproceedings whicb relate to conpensat,ion for death or injury to the person or danage to or loss of tangible property if the act or omiseion which is a11e9ed to be aEtributable lo the State and which caused the death, injury or damage occurreciwholly or partly in the territory of the State of the f,orum, and if the author ofthe act or ornission nas present in that territory at the tine of the act or omission. Article 15 Ownershipr,possession and use of property 1- The imrrunity of a State cannot be invoked to prevent a court of another Stateuhich ie otberrise conpetent f,rom exercisirq its jurisdiction in a proceeding whichrelates to the deEernination of: (a) any right or interest of the state in, or its possession or use ofr or any :obllgation of Ehe State arising out of iEs interest in, or its possession oruse of, inrcvable properLy situaEed in the state of ttre forunl or ' (b) any right or interest of the State in novable or irmovable propertyarising by uay of succession, Eift or bona vacantia; or
analysis: The text appears to be related to international law, specifically to the immunity of a State from jurisdiction in certain proceedings. It discusses the circumstances under which a State can be sued in a foreign court, particularly in cases involving personal injuries, damage to property, and disputes over ownership or use of property. The text does not seem to be related to any specific economic or social sector, but rather to the general principles of international law and state immunity.