text: threw out the last long six years. It has aimed, and I am sure it still aiming, at keeping the status I~UO in order to perpetuate its occupation and, again I repeat, to terrorize us into surrender. 44, The representatives of the four permanent members- before the admission of China-France, the United King- dom, the United States and the USSR, supported Ambas- sador Jarring’s aide-m6moire of 8 February 1971. They, all four of them, expressed satisfaction with Egypt’s response. They, all four of them, asked that Israel give a similar reply. The four representatives of the four permanent members of this Council, as you know Mr. President, requested the Chairman of one of their meetings, Ambassador George Bush of the United States of America, to convey this position to the Secretary-General, which he did. He conveyed to the Secretary-General the fact that the four Powers supported Jarring, found him to be within his mandate and accepted his aide-memoire. 45. But the Israelis simply believe that they have con- quered and that therefore they must enjoy the fruits of conquest, invoking the obsolete right of conquest. If this right is resisted by Egypt, that resistance must be broken. 5 The conquered territories must be pacified and controlled by all means. If the conqueror needs more weapons to impose the conqueror’s will, he knows where to obtain them. If the Council, if the United Nations deem inad- missible the acquisition of territories’ by force, that is, in the eyes of the conqueror, a hypocritical. and immoral posture to be rejected and disdained. The United Nations has no power to dislodge the occupier militarily or materially, and therefore it warrants no respect whatsoever. 46. Israeli leaders keep insisting on direct negotiations with the Arab States “with no prior conditions”. Egypt 
analysis: The text appears to be a political statement or a diplomatic document, discussing the situation between Israel and Egypt, the role of the United Nations, and the refusal of Israel to negotiate without prior conditions. It seems to be focused on the political and diplomatic aspects of the conflict, rather than any specific economic, environmental, or social issues.