text: cerned to halt all military actions immediately and agree to an unconditional cease-fire and the resump- tion of ne,gotiations. The Council should extend the Secretary-IGeneral’s mandate for mediation. 128. In accordance with the above position, the Chi- nese delegation will vote in favour of the draft resolu- tion submitted by Panama and Spain. 129. Sir Anthony PARSONS (Unit,ed Kingdom): 1 shall be very brief. I just wish to make one or two observatioms in response to certain statements made by my colleague from the Soviet Union. He accused us of stubborn unwillingness. Yes, we are stubbornly unwilling to compromise on certain principles, and I set out those principles very clearly in my earlier statement. But we have been equally stubbornly willing to exert every effort to bring about the peace- ful implementation of a mandatory resolution of the Council. 130. With a sense of anticipation which I never realized that I possessed, I think that I replied to some of the more archaeological comments of my Soviet colleague about colonialism, imperialism and such like in the statement I made before he made his. 1 would like only to re-emphasize one point, and that relates to the strategic fantasy which my Soviet colleague wove before our eyes. I can only repeat what I said at the end of my statement. Our only reason for requiring adequate security arrangements in the long term in the Falkland Islands is to shield the islanders against the threat or actuality of further aggression. That is our sole purpose. 13 1 . The PRESIDENT (intc~rpr.ptntiorz~~om Frenc*h): I call on the representative of Argentina. 132. Mr. ROS (Argentina) (inte,pretationJ~om S,mn- is/?): I shall try to be as brief as possible and take up very little of the time of the Council. I have taken note 
analysis: The text appears to be a diplomatic document, discussing a conflict and the proposals for a resolution. The language used is formal and official, indicating that it is a statement made by a representative of a country in the United Nations. The content revolves around the conflict in the Falkland Islands, the positions of different countries, and the proposed resolution. There is no mention of economic development, natural resources, or environmental issues.