text: made on the title of Part III and draft articles 12 to 26, a6 well as those made by the Special Rapporteuc at the forty-second session of the Commission. As regards the comments and proposals of the Special Rapporteur on draft articles 1 to 11 ti ZZ/ only a few members expressed opinions on them in plenary, mainly because other members had already expressed their views at the previous session, One member was of the opinion that the scope of the draft articles should be expanded to cover not only immunity of a State from the jurisdiction of a court of another State, and measures of constraint, aa proposed by the Special Rapporteur, but also to immunity from the jurisdiction of legislative bodies or institutions of another State, and suqgested that articles 1 and 5 (original article 6 (State immunity)) should be amended to that effect. Concerning the newly-combined article 2 (Use of terms), one member supported the proposal of the Special Rspporteur to change the words “commercial contract” in paragraph 1 (c) to read “commercial transaction“. The same member, on the other hand, expressed doubts shout the Special Rapporteur’s proposal concerning paragraph 3 of the newly-combined article 2, which was to use the nature of a transaction as the primary test for determining whether or not the transaction was commercial but also to allow the forum court to take a governmental purpose into account, It was held that the proposed reformulation still begged the fundemental question of the relevance of an asserted yovernmental purpose of a transaction which was by its nature commercial, and that any reference to the purpose of a transaction would merely confuse the isrjue. Two other members commented on the said proposal of the Special Rapporteur, one in support of the proposed
analysis: The text appears to be discussing legal matters related to international relations, specifically state immunity and jurisdiction. The language used is technical and formal, indicating a focus on legal concepts and terminology. The discussion revolves around the revision of draft articles and the opinions of various members on specific proposals. Given the nature of the text, it is unlikely to be related to economic development, natural resources, environment, agriculture, forestry, fishing, health, education, employment, humanitarian aid, or culture.