text: have a colonial question before us, as we stated at the Council’s meeting of 3 April [2.?SOth mWin,g]. 173. At that meeting I expressed my own country’s concern at the threat represented by the colonial presence of an extra-continental Power in Latin Amer- ican territory. On 3 April there had been no breach of the peace, there had been no outbreak of hostilities. When the Government of Argentina carried out the occupation of the archipelago which rightfully belongs to it, it did so with great respect for peace and for individual safety which reflected great care for human life, and it caused no personal harm to any British soldier or to any civilian. 174. It was claimed that that action by Argentina violated the legal order, but the opinion of Panama and the opinion of the General Assembly in many resolu- tions is that the State that was committing a breach of the peace was the State which does not belong to that continent, which did not comply with the United Na- tions resolutions on decolonization and which was dis- regarding Assembly resolution 1514 (XV). 17s. We have proclaimed here an anti-colonial law which has not been codified but which appears in many resolutions and which the colonial and neo- colonialist Powers naturally do not want to see codi- fied. Therefore, peoples that want to maintain their territorial integrity, freedom and independence must lay claim to their anti-colonial rights as enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations and in nufm?rous reso- lutions. 176. Those resolutions emerged as Latin American initiatives at the time when Latin America constituted the strongest regional group of the United Nations and have been strengthened with the passage of time by the Asian, African and Arab nations and by some European nations which are in harmony wjth the 
analysis: The text appears to be a diplomatic statement discussing a conflict between Argentina and an unnamed "extra-continental Power" over a disputed territory in Latin America. The language used is formal and emphasizes the principles of international law, decolonization, and self-determination. The text does not mention economic, environmental, or social issues, but rather focuses on the political and legal aspects of the conflict.