text: the floor to make their statement. Having said that, I give the floor to the representative of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. Mr. HAN (Democratic People's Republic of Korea); Mr. President, I am sorry to ask you for the floor again. However, I would like to ask you to give me the floor after the statement of the representative of the United States. I will answer briefly after hearing the two statements. The PRESIDENT ; May I ask the representative of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea for a clarification? I hope he heard that we do not have a system of rights of reply. If there is a statement to be made, my understanding is that when the Democratic People's Republic of Korea has asked for the floor to make a statement then there is a statement to be made. If so, you have the floor now, Sir, to make your statement, because there is no concept, procedure or tradition of rights of reply. So, are you availing yourself of this opportunity to make a statement or are you yielding that opportunity? Mr, HAN (Democratic People's Republic of Korea): I am sorry to delay the conclusion of the Conference. However, it is regrettable to hear the statement made by the representative of South Korea saying this and that. It is not worth arguing, and I therefore refrain from doing so. May I make one thing clear? As regards the concrete wall, we are ready to invite anyone who has doubts to the site where the wall stands. Secondly, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea is ready to sign the safeguard agreement of NPT, and we have had negotiations with the Atomic Energy Agency twice, so that there is no need for them to worry about this and mislead world opinion. Mr. BRECKON (United States of America): Mr. President, I am very 
analysis: The text appears to be a discussion about a conference, where representatives from different countries are making statements. The statements seem to be related to international politics, specifically regarding the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) and its nuclear program. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting a high-level meeting or conference. The topics discussed include the DPRK's nuclear program, the construction of a concrete wall, and the country's willingness to sign the safeguard agreement of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).