text: defied the various United Nations resolutions calling upon it to put an immediate, unconditional end to its illegal occupation of that Territory and to grant the Namibian people its right of self-determination and independence. presiding over the work of the Security Council for Octo- ber and of congratulating your predecessor, Sir John Thomson, for the skilful and competent way in which he conducted the work of the Council last month. 82. However, despite the near-immunity it enjoys at pres- ent, South Africa must understand once and for all that its policy of out and out aggression against the countries of the region, particularly Angola, can not supply it with an appropriate framework for it to set up at Windhoek a constitutional and political system that would enable it to perpetuate its colonial domination over Namibia and to delay selfdetermination and independence indefinitely. 88. I should also like to thank the members of the Coun- cil for giving me this opportunity to express our solidarity with the People’s Republic of Angola. 83. At this point I should like to take the opportunity to quote some passages from the statement. made by Mr. Habib Bourguiba, President of the Republic of Tunisia, when commemorating Namibia Day last August. He said: 89. Just two weeks ago the Council adopted resolution 571 (1985), demanding that South Africa immediately and unconditionally withdraw its military forces from Angola, cease all acts of aggression against that State and scrupu- lously respect its sovereignty territorial integrity. Today the Council is convened once again to consider one more unjustified act of aggression, a premeditated act by the Government of South Africa against the People’s Republic of Angola. “Tunisia finds it intolerable that at a time when the United Nations is about to celebrate its fortieth anniver- 
analysis: The text appears to be a speech or statement made by a representative of the United Nations, criticizing South Africa's occupation of Namibia and its aggressive actions against Angola. The language used is formal and diplomatic, and the focus is on international relations, politics, and human rights. The text does not mention specific economic, environmental, or scientific issues, but rather emphasizes the need for self-determination and independence for the Namibian people.