text: 1990wouldariseintheamountof$288,000, broken downthus:$195,800 under section 1(Overall policy-making, direction andco-ordination), $13,200 under section 20(International drugcontrol), and$79,000 undersection 27(Public information); thoserequirements wouldconstitute additional expenditures not provided forintheproposed programme budget andwouldtherefore besubject tothe guidelines fortheuseandoperation ofthecontingency fundsetoutintheannex toAssembly resolution 42/211of21December 1987;iftherequirements couldnotbe metfromthecontingency fund,noredeployment ofresources ormodification of activities wasenvisaged, exceptundersection 27;accordingly, itmightbe necessary topostpone thespecial sessionifitwasnotpossible tofinance from thecontingency fundtheadditional requirements specified above. 8.TheFifthCommittee shouldalsoinformtheGeneral Assembly thattheadoption ofthedraftresolution andthedraftdecision wouldbeSUbject tothe understanding justoutlined, inaccordance withsection C,paragraphs 3and4,of theannextoAssembly resolution 42/211, andthatsuchadditional appropriations as mightberequired wouldbeindicated bytheSecretary-General inaconsolidated statement ofprogramme budgetimplications andrevised estimates ~/tobesubmitted totheGeneral Assembly towards theendofthesession, inaccordance with section C,paragraph 5,oftheannextoresolution 42/211. (SeeA/C.5/44/SR.26, paras.1-6.) Administration ofjustice intheSecretariat 9.Atthe28thmeeting, theChairman oftheAdvisory Committee saidthatthe Secretary-General's reportontheadministration ofjustice intheSecretariat (A/C.5/44/9) hadbeendrawnupinpursuance ofGeneral Assembly resolution 43/224 B of21December 1988,bywhich the~Assembly hadrequested theSecretary-General to establish bytheendof1989afullyrevised internal justice system, tofinish putting inplaceimproved disciplinary rulesandprocedures attheearliest stage, aswellasrevised appellate procedures. andtoreportthereon totheAssembly at itsforty-·fourth session. Insection Iofthereport, whichdealtwith improvements intheareaofappeals, itwasstatedthattheappellate machinery and procedures hadbeenstreamlined in1988: aredistribution ofresponsibilities between theoffices responsible forconducting theadministrative reviews ofstaff appeals andproviding secretarial services totheJointAppeals Board(JAB)had beencarried out,whilethepresentation ofresponses tostatements ofappeal and theconsideration ofnewappeals hadbecomemoretimely. TheAdvisory Committee -34-contingency fundsetoutinsection CofannexItoGeneral Assembly resolution 41/213of19December 1986andIntheannextoAssembly resolution 42/211of 21December 1987.Inparagraphs 15and16ofhisstatement ofprogramme budget Implication~, theSecretary-General indicat.d thatwiththeexception ofthepublic information activities, whichcameundersection 27(Public information) hecould notpropose themodification ofanyactivity oftheproposed programme budgetfor thebiennium 1990-~99l inorde~tofinance thenewactivities. 1.TheAdvisory Committee hadnQobjections totheSecretary-Gen~ral's er-timates oftheadditional requirements deriving fromthedraftresolution andthedraft dlcision. Ittherlfore recommended tbattheFifthCommittee shouldinformthe Glneral Assembly that,shoulditadoptdraftresolution A/44/L.l2 anddraft dlcision A/44/L.l3, theholding ofthefirstsession ofthePreparatory Committee oftheWholeinDecember 1989wouldconstitute anexception totheprovisions of .ectionI,paragraph 7,ofre.olution 40/243, additional resource requirements in 1990wouldariseintheamountof1288,000, brokendownthusl'195,800 under slction 1(Overall policy-making, direction andco-ordination), $13,200 under section 20(International drugcontrol), and$79,000 under se~tion 27(Public information), thoserequirements wouldconstitute additional expenditures not provided forintheproposed programme budgetandwouldtherefore besubject tothe guidelines fortheuseandoperation ofthecontinqency fund.etoutintheannex toAssembly resolution 42/211of21December 1987;iftherequirements couldnotbe metfromthecontingency fund,noredeployment ofresources ormodification of
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the budget and financial implications of a draft resolution and decision, specifically mentioning additional requirements and contingency funds. It also touches on the administration of justice in the Secretariat and the establishment of a fully revised internal justice system. Given the focus on financial and administrative aspects, it is likely that the category is related to governance or administration.