text: 3. Ca/ls upon the two Govemments to co-operate fully with the United Nations Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan (UNMOGIP) in its task of super­ vising the observance of the cease-fire; 4. Requests the Secretary-General to report to the Council within three days on the implementation of the present resolution. Adopted unanimous/y at the 1237th meeting. Resolution 210 (1965) of 6 September 1965 The Security Council, Noting the report of the Secretary-General.33 on developments in the situation in Kashmir since the adoption of Security Council resolution 209 (1965) of 4 September 1965 calling for a cease-fire, Noting with deep concern the extension of the fighting which adds immeasurably to the seriousness of the situation, I. Calls upon the parties to cease hostilities in the entire area of conflict immediately, and promptly with­ draw all armed personnel to the positions held by them before 5 August 1965; 2. Requests the Secretary-General to exert every possible effort to give effect to the present resolution and to resolution 209 (1965), to take all measures possible to strengthen the United Nations Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan, and to keep the Council promptly and currently informed on the imple­ mentation of the resolutions and on the situation in the area; 3. Decides to keep this issue under urgent and con­ tinuous review so that the Council may determine what further steps may be necessary to secure peace and security in the area. Adopted unanimous/y at the 1238th meeting. Resolution 211 (1965) of 20 September 1965 The Security Council, Having considered the reports of the Secretary-General on bis consultations with the Governments of India and Pakistan, 34 Commending the Secretary-General for his unrelenting efforts in furtherance of the objectives of Security a3 Ibid., document S/6661. 84 Ibid., documents S/6683 and S/6686. 
analysis: The text appears to be related to a conflict between two countries (India and Pakistan) and the efforts of the United Nations to resolve the situation. The language used is formal and diplomatic, indicating a high-level international discussion. The text does not mention any economic, environmental, or social issues, but rather focuses on the military situation and the need for a cease-fire.