text: terms with its neighbours and decide to live, for once in the entire existence of Pakistan, in peace with its neighbours. The present policy has brought a great deal of suffering to the people of Afghanistan, but also to the people of Pakistan. We all know that a few months aco there was an election in Pakistan. The people of Pakistan went to the ballot boxes and they chose their own civilian leadership. Unfortunately, however, the fact remains that the military is not back in its barracks; it is not attending to its own military affairs; it is controlling Pakistan's policies. This has prevented j BCT/PLJ A/S-18/PV. 9 88 (Mr. Roshan-Rawaan , Afghanistan ) the emergence of genuine democracy in Pakistan and has increased the suffering and the suppression of various nationalities in Pakistan - the Pushtuns, the Baluchis, the Muhajir, the Sindhis. These military circles have imposed their own policy, based on interference and intervention in and aggression against our country. I must remind the representative of Pakistan that this policy cannot win anything. Jalalabad proved that; Kabul proved that. Even when Jalalabad introduced its own military battalions into the fighting, this was not able to save the day for the Pakistani IS I. Pakistan nust recognize that there is a nation living beside it as a neighbour. We want friendship with the people of Pakistan. We are friends of the People of Pakistan. We have a long common history. We have a common culture. We have a common language. There is no reason for us to be enemies. I do not believe for a second that the people of Pakistan want to be enemies of the people of Afghanistan. It is this small military circle that has taken the fate of a proud 
analysis: The text appears to be a speech or statement by a representative of Afghanistan, criticizing Pakistan's military interference in Afghanistan and its internal affairs. The speaker emphasizes the need for peaceful relations between the two countries and highlights the suffering caused by Pakistan's military actions. The text does not mention economic, environmental, or scientific issues, but focuses on political and social tensions between the two nations.