text: international waterways in the area; “(b) For achieving a just settlement of the refugee problem; “{c) For guaranteeing the territorial inviolability and politicai independence of every State in the area, through measures including the establishment of demilitarized zones”. 19. As can be seen, those provisions of paragraphs I and 2 of resolution 242 (1967) have laid down the basic prin- ciples for a peaceful settlement. There is no doubt that their correct and sincere application could lead to an equitable settlement. We repeat that if, unfortunately, such is not the case and has not been the case heretofore, that is because, above all, of the attitude of Israel which, to say the least is negative. Indeed, in the face of the constructive proposals formulated by the Special Representative of the Secretary-General, Israel always took an attitude that was negative in the extreme. The Government of the Arab Republic of Egypt, for its part, has shown courage and goodwill by responding positively to those proposals. 20. Thus, Ambassador Gunnar Jarring’s mission, because of Israel’s refusal to co-operate, has found itself bogged down in an impasse. The question still remains in all its dimensions and the prospects for a just and lasting settlement of the problems of the Middle East remain not very encouraging. 21. Despite the numerous efforts of the international community, Israel continues to occupy the territories of three Member States of our Organization and the Arab populations displaced as a result of that occupation Continue to live in exile, in despair. Other efforts to restore peace in the region have failed. The negotiations of the four Powers, which were carried out within the framework of the Security Council, to assist the Jarring mission, also met with failure. 22. The members of the Security Council will recall, for 
analysis: The text appears to be a diplomatic statement discussing the situation in the Middle East, specifically the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It mentions the occupation of territories, refugee problems, and the failure of peace negotiations. The language used is formal and official, suggesting a document from an international organization or government. Given the context, it is likely that the text is related to international relations, politics, and security.