text: relations with it, cannot be accused of unfairness to Israel, since Egypt has recognized all the rights to which Israel is entitled under the prevailing political order. And it is from this position that we rise up with all vigour against all of Israel’s policies in the area. We reject totally and unconditionally the Israeli inva- sion of Lebanon with all its consequences. We like- wise reject Israeli policies and measures against the Palestinian people and against the PLO. 33. It is inconceivable to us-as it must be to every member of the Council-that the tension-ravaged situation in Lebanon can have been dragging on for several weeks without a solution, There should be limits on how long this situation can prevail and can remain in no way conducive to advancing the cause of peace in the Middle East. We must share the convic- tion that peace in Lebanon can be attained only through respect for its territorial integrity, sovereignty and political independence. That can never be realized without the complete withdrawal of all Israeli forces from all Lebanese territory. 34. Aware of the gravity of this situation, a number of peace-loving countries have embarked on all-out initiatives to bring to an end this harrowing situation which seriously threatens the prospects of peace and security in the Middle East, 35. Egypt, for its part, cannot but support all efforts aimed at defusing the current situation while at the same time giving due consideration to the wider situa- tion involving the prospects of a durable peace in the Middle East. From the standpoint of its regional re- sponsibilities, and out of its inherent conviction that peace is indivisible, Egypt, together with France, has embarked on a new initiative to help achieve a just, lasting and comprehensive peaceful settlement not only for the extremely pressing crisis of Lebanon but 
analysis: The text appears to be a diplomatic statement or a resolution from an international organization, such as the United Nations. It discusses the situation in Lebanon, the Israeli invasion, and the need for a peaceful settlement. The language used is formal and emphasizes the importance of respecting the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Lebanon. The text also mentions the broader context of the Middle East and the need for a durable peace.