text: Natioua aad tbe AAT.CC could b€ ltr'tber Irrootd and oae of tbe areas conslalered ia thi s cortart },as j.a laLation to poasible rial€r use of tbe procetlures avaiLabl,e utder tbe Stahrt e aa<t the r€rris€d. RuJ.ee of tbe late:natlona.l Court of Justice fo! settle@eot of legal {isputes anon€Et StateE partiss. The roatter wes briefty discuss€d at a !!€etirg of Le€el advLsers of the Menber StateE of tbe Ailcc held at the uDit€a! Nations in Nowcrber 1981. Tlhe }!€€ti.Dg bad recoooded that ttre A ar,CC S€ct€t"l at Elrorlaf lr€paro a EtudJr o tbe question of poEslble }rider uEe of the Court bX a conpronise thele StateE Pa.rtles EaJr so a€lee ald tbet the str:d.y EhoutA be prese[ted at tbe Coroitt€€ | E tte:(t SeEsid for ccoElderafi.o.A/4O/682 Eng li sh Paqe 3 It Eey b6 6tat€d that €v€B thor€h tha Iateaatioael Courb of JuEtice 18 the lrbcipal judiciat oqgs of tb€ United Nati.oss ard 1ts l'lEob€r Stat€B ar€ !pg,g, facto pa^rtiea to tbe Statute of th€ Court, ther€ haa b€e coaaidslablE rEluctace l:r the natter of acceptiog the Cour+rs coEDu.LEory jurigdiotloo and ev@ ia refelfJ.ag disputes by a€leeEent of pa'fbies. Uhil €t such reluctanc€ caD be saial to be attri.butable La soE6 E€alrur€ to the attitude of a 1aq9e nuob€r of states againEt acceptace of cooguloory pfocedures, th6!6 r'ouJ'd. agpear to b€ ot,lrs! leasons as rr€11. A brad survey noulrt irdicate that tfiil.Et the pactice of resort to th€ Courb, '^&'6tb€r 1or ad.visory )pj.!icd o! i.u coat€lrtj.ous ploceecliags, was not uncor@cn duflrA th€ firgt tlo alecad€s of the Court, the later yea^rs reveal a lesser nu[ber of refereocee beJ.rg oade to the Court aDd ths gEadual l,rgfe!@ce for ad boc tribrnals coastituted by agreeoeot of pa:rtlao for settleoent of diEputes. Atteopts bav€ therefore b€erl Eade fricE tiE€ to ti.oe
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the role of the European Court of Justice in resolving disputes between member states of the European Union. The language used is formal and technical, suggesting a context related to international law and diplomacy. The text also mentions the reluctance of some states to accept the court's jurisdiction, which may be related to issues of sovereignty and national interest.