text: 461. Other members, referring to the reservations of Borne member6 about various aspects of the draft article, pointed out that it reproduced a similar provision of the 1946 Convention on the Privilege6 and Immunities of the United Nations and therefore 6eemed acceptable, 462. As for article 11, 29fi/ eeveral member6 viewed it a6 unnecessary, since its content wa6 covered by the subject-matter of article 4. One member also pointed out that article 11 might introduce an element of uncertainty in 2.9.5/ Article 11, as proposed by the Special Rapporteur, read a6 follows; Notwithstanding the provisions of article 10, paragraph6 (a) and (b),the scope of the rights accorded may be limited, in the light 01 the functional requirements of the organisation in question, by mutual agreement of the parties concerned.” - 240 -the interpretation of article 10 and make it difficult to determine which “functional requirements” had tu be taken into account for the purpose of limiting the provisions of article 10, paragraph6 (a) and (I?), He said that the fiscal independence international organisations ought to enjoy did not make it advieable to include article 11 in the draft. 463. On the other hand, another member found it useful to incorporate the article in the draft, provided the wording was amended, particularly the phrase “the scope of the right6 accorded may be limited, in the light of the functional requirement6 of the organisation”, for, in his opinion, it could give the impression that the common regime established in article 10 failed to tak9 account of the functional requirements criterion. 464, On completion of the di6CU6SiOn of the item, the Commiseion decided to refer articles 1 to 11, a6 proposed by the Special Rapporteur, to the Drafting Committee. - 241 -CHAPTER Vl'f INTERNATIONAL LIABILITY FOR INJURIOUS CONSEQUEWES ARISINQ OUT OF ACTS NOT PROHLEITED BY INTERNATIONAL LAW
analysis: The text appears to be discussing a draft article related to international organizations, specifically their privileges and immunities, and the limitations of their rights. The language used is formal and technical, indicating that it may be related to international law or diplomatic relations. The topic does not seem to be related to any specific economic or social sector, but rather focuses on the institutional framework and governance of international organizations.