text: At its 1493rd meeting, on 4 August 1969, the Coun­ cil decided to invite the representative of India to participate, without vote, in the discussion of the question. 3 Ibid., Supplement for July, August and September 1969. 2 Resolution 269 (1969) of 12 August I 969 The Security Council, Recalling its resolution 264 ( 1969) of 20 March 1969, Taking note of the report of the Secretary-General contained in document S/9204,4 Mindful of its responsibility to take necessary action to secure strict compliance with the obligations entered into by States Members of the United Nations under the provisions of Article 25 of the Charter of the United Nations, Mindful also of its responsibilities under Article 6 of the Charter of the United Nations, 1. Reaffirms its resolution 264 ( 1969); 2. Condemns the Government of South Africa for its refusal to comply with resolution 264 ( 1969) and for its persistent defiance of the authority of the United Nations; 3. Decides that the continued occupation of the Territory of Namibia by the South African authorities constitutes an aggressive encroachment on the authority of the United Nations, a violation of the territorial in­ tegrity and a denial of the political sovereignty of the people of Namibia; 4. Recognizes the legitimacy of the struggle of the people of Namibia against the illegal presence of the South African authorities in the Territory; 5. Calls upon the Government of South Africa to withdraw its administration from the Territory im­ mediately and in any case before 4 October 1969; 6. Decides that in the event of failure on the part of the Government of South Africa to comply with the provisions of the preceding paragraph of the present resolution, the Security Council will meet immediately to determine upon effective measures in accordance with the appropriate provisions of the relevant Chap­
analysis: The text appears to be a United Nations Security Council resolution, addressing a conflict over the occupation of the Territory of Namibia by South African authorities. The language used suggests a focus on international relations, territorial integrity, and political sovereignty, rather than economic, environmental, or social issues.