text: summary records, for the Commission's forty-seventh session. The Council takes note of the Commission's decision to request the Chairman at its forty-seventh session to make every effort to organize the work of the session within the normal allotted time, the additional meetings to be utilized only if they prove to be absolutely necessary. [See chap. II, sect. B, decision 1990/116, and chap. III.] -14-II. RESOLUTIONS AND DECISIONS ADOPTED BY THE COMMISSION AT ITS FORTY-SIXTH SESSION A. Resolutions 1990/1. Israeli settlements in the occupied Arab territories The Commission on Human Rights, Recalling that, in accordance with article 13, paragraph 2 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, everyone has the right to leave any country including his own and to return to his country. Affirming that the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949, is applicable to all Palestinian and Arab territories occupied by Israel since 1967, including Jerusalem, Seriously concerned at the recent suggestions that immigrants to Israel may be settled in the occupied territories, 1. Affirms that the settling of Israeli civilians in the occupied territories is illegal and contravenes the relevant provisions of the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, 2. Calls upon the Government of Israel to refrain from settling immigrants in the occupied territories. 28th meeting 16 Februaty 1990 [Adopted by a roll-call vote of 42 to none, with 1 abstention. See chap. IV.] 1990/2. Question of violations of human rights in occupied Palestine A The Commission on Human Rights, Guided by the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations as well as the provisions of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Guided also by the provisions of the International Covenant on Economic,
analysis: The text appears to be related to human rights and international law, specifically addressing issues related to occupied territories and the settlement of civilians. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting that it is a resolution or decision made by an international organization. The topics discussed, such as the right to leave any country and the applicability of the Fourth Geneva Convention, further support this hypothesis.