text: Rapporteur of the Fund for Namibia ...". On 23 March 1982, the Applicant informed the Director, IAD , that he did not possess any wr itten evidence concerning payments made to payees Nos. 1 through 22. He confirmed that those individuals had not submitted written requests for funds, asked for travel documents or requested return tickets from the U.S.A. overseas. Some evidence was available for 13 others and he would provide it to the Director, IAD, before departing on a mission.He stated however, that all cases listed in annex A had been "considered and verbally approved" by the then Commissioner for Namibia. On the next day, the Applican t provided to the Director, IAD, the two addresses "known to [his ] office" for the first 22 indiv iduals. Upon the Organizations's later investigation none of those individuals was found to have bee n residing at those addresses. He asserted that he had reason t o believe that those individuals had been "brought here [to the U.S.A.] and returned by the Democratic Turnhalle Alliance [a Namibian grou p rival to SWAPO]." He also stated that "the practice of assistin g needy Namibians and cashing their cheques was initiated as early a s- 7 - 1964 through arrangements made by [the] former Commissioner ... with the Chemical Branch Bank". This practice had been continued since . In this connection, the Applic ant attached a copy of a letter dated 4 February 1981, in which he had allegedly sought the Bank' s co-operation to cash cheques endorsed by payees and presented to the Bank by OCN. In response to a request by the Organization regarding this letter, an officer of the Bank, in a handwritten note at th e bottom of the page, wrote: "To our knowledge we do not have thi s letter on file".
analysis: The text appears to be related to a financial assistance program provided by the Fund for Namibia, which suggests a humanitarian aid and relief context. The mention of cashing cheques endorsed by payees and presented to a bank also implies a financial transaction. However, the text does not provide any information about the specific projects or activities funded by the program, which makes it challenging to categorize it under a more specific category.