text: Angola’s territorial integrity. South Africa has never pro- duced evidence-not a shred of evidence-to show how the presence of Cuban forces is a threat to its security. Angola does not share a border with South Africa. Between the two, countries lies a vast country called Na- mibia, which is in no way, form or shape part of South Africa. No Cuban soldier has ever set foot on Namibia, let alone gone anywhere near South Africa. 67. So we ask: Why these repeated violations of Angola’s territorial integrity, the massacre of innocent refugees resi- dent in that country, the wanton destruction of economic infrastructure, and the senseless mass murder of Angolan civilians? Why? 68. Just imagine the cynicism with which the delibera- tions of this Council are regarded by a country whose evil policies would shame even the devil himself. The other day the Council was treated to a charade in the form of a draft resolution [S/17522], all of whose operative paragraphs cry for implementation by Pretoria itself. Cuban troops are in Angola by invitation. South African troops are not. Cuban troops are not violating the territorial integrity of Angola. South African troops are. In any case, what right does South Africa have to teach Angola lessons in political righteousness and constitutional probity? Is it not South Africa itself which must learn all these lessons in order that it can at long last be rehabilitated into the comity of free and civiiized nations? 69. It is in South Africa, more than anywhere else in our region, that operative paragraph 3 of South Africa’s cyni- cal draft resolution must be implemented without delay; for there is in that country today not simply a polarization of factions feuding about political differences but a very serious situation whose likely consequences we shudder to 
analysis: The text appears to be a diplomatic statement or a speech addressing the United Nations Security Council, likely in response to the South African government's actions in Angola. The language used is formal and critical, suggesting a strong opposition to South Africa's policies. The text does not mention economic development, natural resources, or environmental issues, but rather focuses on territorial integrity, political rights, and the actions of governments.