text: ASUNITED NATIONS GeneralAssembly SecurityCouncilDistr. GENERAL A/44/ 938 s/ 2L265 24 April 1990 ORIGINALs ENGLISH GENERAL ASSEMBLY Forty-fourth ses s ion Agenda iten 47 QUESTTON OF CYPRUSSECI]RITY COUNCIL Forty-fifth year Lecter dateal ?3 April l-990 from the Pernanent ReDresentative of Cvprus to the United Nations adalressed to the Secretarv-General I have the honour to bring to your attention that the letters dated 27 March and 12 April 1990, addressed !o you from the Pernanent RePresentative of Turkey co the United Natioas, and circulated as docunencs of the General Assenbly and the Security council (A/44/932-S/2L212) and (L/44/93'l-S/2L245), are in abuse of the processes and the rnechanisrns that have been established in the United Nations systen in order to pronote the cause of the Organization Lhich, amoDg other things, as we all know, is to offer a pfatforn for co-oPeration and conciliation. In requesting the circulation of the above-nentioued letLers, a practice repeated on rxumerous occasions in the past, the Pernanent Representative of Turkey creates a clinat.e of controversy and promctes an eDtity $hich was coademned strongly and unequivocabLy by the Security Council when resolutions 541 (1983) and 550 (l-984) were adopted. To request the Secretary-Gene rat to circulate letters and statements ernanating from and expressing the vieats of an illegitimate entitY as a document of the Security Council, is an act involving coDtemPt for the very sa,ne Security Council whictr condemned this ilfegal entity and aE the same time requested all United Naeions Menber States not. to lecognize it. This behaviour can only be characterized as abusive and insultive to both the Secretary-Gene ral anal the Security Council. Suffice it !o say thaE che letEer dat.ed 2? March, nentioned above, }|as used by the Permanent Representative of Turkey to attack the EuroPean Parliarnent, a body
analysis: This text appears to be a diplomatic correspondence between the Permanent Representative of Cyprus and the Secretary-General of the United Nations, discussing a security issue related to Cyprus. The tone is formal and critical, indicating a high-level political debate. The language used is technical and refers to specific UN resolutions and documents, suggesting a specialized topic.