text: (Mr. Al-Khussaiby, (bran) aumxatiou of a sovereign State and a full-fledqed Member of the Uuited Nntioos that has enjoyad years of international recognition by all countries, including Kraq. Here the international ammunity vaf3 faced once again with another eeriau3 situation which justified the adoption of another Security Council resolution. It i8 to be h-d that the resolution adopted here thie nrocning will send a clear message 6~ the vmld that such a daclara ticm of anneXatian of the legitimte and sovereign State of Kuwait is null Ed void and unacceptable. In ctx~clusion, I vish ta take the OQpOttmity b express my apprecfation to youB Ht. President, the members of the Security Council, the Secretary-General, and the Me&era of the UniM Nations for their uuderstahding, encouragement, tireless effort8 and support. The PREsXDBJT: I thank the representative of Quan for his hind words aaaressfid to me. The next epeaker is the representative of Iraq on whom I nw call. Mr. AL-ANBAR (Iraq) (interpretaticm frm Arabic) t Those who live in 91-a houses should not throw stones, especially at their neighbours* hcmes. Forty-five years aqo, the United Sta tea of! America dropped the atomic bomb on two Japanese cities, killing thousands of innocent people dur inq the edurse of that opera tlon. Some weeks ago the Council met in Geneva , with the support of all ita member Statee, to aebate the protection of womeu and children in the occupied Arab terribories resulting from Ierael’s aations. The American delegation, however, did uot hesitate to exercise its veto (D prevent the adoptiar of a resalutiar dn the subject. It was not alare in this, because the Beleqatians of other counttie have also dealt with Security Council resolutiona in the p-t without qivinq due 
analysis: The text appears to be a speech or statement made by a representative of Kuwait, addressing the United Nations Security Council. The content revolves around the annexation of Kuwait by Iraq, and the speaker is emphasizing the illegality and unacceptable nature of this action. The text does not mention specific economic, environmental, or social issues, but rather focuses on the political and international implications of the annexation. Given this context, it is likely that the text falls under a category related to international relations or politics.