text: The Ukrainian PSR is in full aqreement with the reiteration hy the General Assembly in its resolution 39/50 of 12 December 19A4 that the continuinq illeclnl and Colonial OCCUpatim Of Namibia hy South Africa, in defiance of repeated Gener,bl AReemhly and Security Council resolutions, constitutes an act of aqqresslon aqainnt the Namihian people and a challenqe to the allthority of the [Inited NatinnR, which ha5 direct responRihility for Namibia until independence. This raap>naihi I lty fo1 the political fate of Namibia makeR it incumbent upnn the United NatinnR tn play ii decisive role in the Namihian settlement, the whole process of which mu5t he undf?r the conetant and effective supervision of the Security Council. The [Jkrainian SSR eupporte all the IJnited NatinnR resolutions and dec1RinnR Iltl the ouention of Namibia, includinq General ARsemhly resolution 39/50, and calls ftrr an end to be put to the illeqal occupation of Namihia by the racist rdqime of South Africa, and for the immediate qrantinq of independence to Namibia in accordance with the LJI I,;il? NationR decisions on the euhject. The only i9Cceptahle haRiR for A political eettleleent of the auestion of Namibia and the accession of the Nsmihian people to indeperldence and independent development remains Security Council resolution 435 (19781, the full implementation of which, without any ChanqeR, reservations or prior condition5 , muet be initiated forthwith. AR a member of the Security Council, the Ukrainian SSR 5upportsd Council resolution 566 (19851, in which the insistence on linkinq the independence of Namibia to irre.levant and extraneous ~RRIJ~FI iR re)ected. The Ukrainian SSR 5tronqly condemn5 the continuiny illeqal occupation nf Namibia hy the racist regime of South Africa and the stepA it has taken tn undermine the unity and territorial inteqrity of the country, as well an its / . . . A/40/6 54 S/l 7471 EnqliRh 
analysis: The text appears to be a political statement or resolution from the Ukrainian SSR (Soviet Socialist Republic) regarding the situation in Namibia, specifically the occupation by South Africa. The language used is formal and diplomatic, with a focus on international law, the United Nations, and the Security Council. The text does not mention specific economic, environmental, or social issues in Namibia, but rather emphasizes the need for independence and self-determination for the Namibian people.