text: to dismiss him with effect from 28 May 1982, under staff regulatio n 10.2, for serious misconduct and that this decision was base d upon the report of the Commission. The Applicant was also advised that if he returned to the U.N. the full amount of the misappropriated funds, the U.N. would refrain from any further action against him. On 4 June 1982, the Applicant wrote to the Secretary-Genera l- 11 - stating that he had not been given an opportunity to respond to th e Commission's report and that he requested the Secretary-General t o withdraw his decision until he had been given the opportunity t o respond to the charges against him. He also requested th e Secretary-General to submit his appeal in this case, the "se cond case" directly to the Administrative Tribunal. On 4 June 1982, the Administrative Officer of OCN issued a P .35 form (Personnel Payroll Clearance Action Form) which was sig ned by the Director, OCN, attesting that the Applicant had separated fr om service on 28 May 1982. The form was also signed by a Personnel Officer a t the Office of Personnel Services. The Office of Financial Service s declined to fill in Section III (the financial section) of the form, until the Applicant had made restitution of the allegedl y misappropriated amounts. On 11 June 1982, the Director, Division of Personne l Administration, transmitted to the Applicant a copy of th e Commission's report and informed him that his request for direc t submission of his appeal to the Tribunal would be considered in th e light of the contents of his appeal to the Joint Appeals Board (JAB) "in order to determine whether the requirements for such exceptional agreement have been met". On 28 June 1982, the Applicant lodged a n
analysis: The text appears to be related to the internal affairs of the United Nations, specifically the termination of an employee's contract due to serious misconduct. The mention of staff regulation 10.2 and the Commission's report suggests a formal process for addressing employee misconduct. The language used is formal and bureaucratic, indicating that the text is likely related to administrative or personnel matters within an organization.