text: of a convention that is the result of such a process. CD/PV.553 30 (Mr, Chirila. Romania ) Finally, our delegation has followed and has taken note with great interest of the comments and opinions expressed here with a view to improving and even re-examining the basis for the activity of the Conference on Disarmament. As Ambassador Sujka emphasized here, such legitimate concerns should not overshadow the substantive work, the carrying out of the negotiating mandate of the Conference. Ambassador Hyltenius correctly emphasized recently here that in the final analysis the prerequisite for negotiating and reaching effective disarmament agreements and measures was and still is political will. We express the hope - the conviction - that such political will will prevail more and more in our work. The PRESIDENT (translated from French ); I thank the distinguished representative of Romania, Dr. Gheorghe Chirila, for his statement and the kind words he addressed to the Chair. (continued in English ) I now give the floor to the representative of Poland, Mr. Gizowski. Mr, GIZOWSKI (Poland): We have already had an opportunity to congratulate your delegation on taking up the presidency of the Conference on Disarmament, but would like once again to wish you every success in discharging your responsible duties. May I take this opportunity to express our thanks to Ambassadors Richard Burt, David Smith and Yuri Nazarkin for their interesting information on the state of affairs in the United States-Soviet bilateral talks, which are of great importance for disarmament in general and the Conference on Disarmament in particular? I would also like to welcome among us Ambassador Juraj Krâlik of Czechoslovakia, and extend to him our assurances of full co-operation with him and his delegation. My statement in the Conference today is connected with the presentation 
analysis: The text appears to be a statement made by a representative of Romania at a conference, discussing the work of the Conference on Disarmament, a multilateral forum focused on disarmament and arms control. The language used is formal and diplomatic, indicating a high-level discussion on international relations and security matters. The mention of specific countries, ambassadors, and bilateral talks suggests that the topic is of a political and international nature.