text: the Organization, such as the Declaration on the Strength- ening of International Security; inseparable from all our obligations flowing from conventions and international rules; inseparable, finally, from the other resolutions adopted in the same area. These resolutions frequently affirm the fundamental principles which we espouse. Such is the case also of resolution 242 (1967). Does not that resolution speak first and foremost of the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by force? Does it not refer specifically to Article 2 of the Charter, which stipulates in particular that the Members of the Organization shall “refrain . . from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity of any State . , .“? 79, How, in these circumstances, can Israel interpret the resolution as an authorization given it by the Security Council to define its boundaries wherever it sees fit through territory belonging to countries enjoying international frontiers clearly identified and recognized? 80. Before this organ and in this Organization only law and justice count. Blackmail based on the use of force and pressure must be, and happily is, outlawed here. 81. The representative of Israel complained the other day before this Council of coercion brought to bear on his country-coercion to which, he asserted, Israel would not yield. What coercion was he referring to? He told us himself: it was coercion by resolutions of the United Nations and other international organizations, it was coercion by the two great Powers, the four great Powers, the ad hoc committees, the special committees, the advisory committees-and, I might add, probably the 10 wise men of Africa, Mr. Jarring and so forth. It is true that the Arab countries have had recourse to these means of coercion, but they have done so because they perhaps have 
analysis: The text appears to be a diplomatic speech or statement addressing the United Nations Security Council, likely related to a conflict or dispute over territorial boundaries. The language used is formal and emphasizes the importance of international law and justice. The text references specific resolutions, articles, and organizations, suggesting a focus on international relations and diplomacy.