text: been suffering for almost 10 years under the yoke of a racist regime. The British Foreign Secretary, Sir Alec Douglas-Home, during his recent visit to African countries, energetically advertised the idea of a “dialogue” between the racists of Southern Rhodesia and representatives of the Zimbabwe people, in order, as he put it, “to create an atmosphere of agreement between the races”. However, the Security Council and its members are well aware of the failure of the famous “dialogue” between the United Nations and the racists of South Africa which was imposed on the Council by certain friends of those South African racists. It is easy to see that, by advocating the idea of a dialogue with the racists in Southern Rhodesia, British ruling circles are clearly trying to contribute to the consolidation of the positions and the perpetuation of the racist and aggressive Smith r&me; they are undermining the resolutions on sanctions and other Council resolutions concerning this regime and are pursuing a policy aimed at strengthening the positions of all racist and colonialist forces in southern Africa. 71. Whether you like it or not, let us be frank: this anti-African regime is in fact also aided and abetted by those countries which continue their illegal trade and other relations with it. 72, The policy of encouragement for and strengthening of the racist regime in Southern Rhodesia is contrary to resolutions of the Security Council and other United Nations bodies and is directed not only against the interests of the Zimbabwe people but also against the interests of all the peoples of Africa. 7 73. The USSR delegation is resolutely opposed to such an anti-African position and policy. We fir&y support the implementation of the United Nations decisions on Southern Rhodesia and the immediate implementation of all Security c0Ut-d resolutions concerning Southern 
analysis: The text appears to be a political statement or speech condemning the racist regime in Southern Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) and criticizing the British government's attempts to legitimize it through dialogue. The author is advocating for the implementation of United Nations resolutions and sanctions against the regime. The text does not mention specific economic or social development projects, nor does it discuss natural resources or environmental issues.