text: 41. Concerning the implications the use of the contingency fund might have for the financing of regular activities, he said that the problem was dealt with by the Advisory Committee in paragraph 17 of its report and that no delegation had raised any objection to the remarks made in that connection by the Advisory Committee's Chairman. He proposed that the Fifth Committee should specify in a preamble that it had taken its decision after examining the programme budget implications and the report of the Advisory Committee and that it endorsed the letter's recommendations, 42. Ms. MUSTONEN (Finland) shared the concerns of the Brazilian delegation in respect of voluntary contributions. The text proposed by the Chairman departed from the draft decision submitted to the Committee and it was not altogether faithful to the spirit of General Assembly resolution 44/228. She proposed that the words "seek ai-cively" should be replaced by the words "welcomes the efforts by the Secretary-General 43. The CHAIRMAN said it was his understanding that the objections raised related to the form rather than to the substance of the third part of his proposal. He read out the first part of his draft decision, which he submitted to the Committee for adoption. 44. Mr. VISLYKH (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics), reaffirming the doubts already expressed by his own delegation and by that of Ghana, proposed that the decision should mention that the acceptance by the United Nations of the Swiss voluntary contribution in the form of free office accommodation should not be construed as its intention to establish in Geneva a permanent Secretariat unit dealing with environmental issues. 45. The CHAIRMAN suggested adding a fourth part to the decision to reflect the Soviet proposal. /. A/C.5/44/SR.63 Knglisb Page 10 46. Mr. ETUKET (Uganda) felt that it would be very useful for delegations to have 
analysis: This text appears to be discussing the budget and financing of the United Nations, specifically the use of a contingency fund and the acceptance of voluntary contributions. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting that it is a meeting of a UN committee or assembly. The topics being discussed, such as the financing of regular activities and the acceptance of voluntary contributions, do not seem to be related to any specific sector or industry.