text: Africa to pataqtaphs 11 and 15 of the resolution. 5. I subsequently transmitted the text of the resolution to States Members of the United Nations tefettinq particularly to pataqtaph 14 of that resolution. 6. With respect to the question of the choice of the electoral system referred t0 in pataqtaph 11 of Security Council resolution 566 (1985), members of the Security Council will recall that in my report to the Security Council of 19 May 1983 (S/lS776, pata. 8), I outlined the position as follows: “AS teqatds the electoral system to he employed in elect inq the Constituent Assembly, it was aqteed that it would be based either on proportional representation or sinqle-member constituencies. I was also assured that all the patties were aqteed that this issue must be settled in accordance with the terms of Security Council resolution 435 (1978) and that the issue must not cause delav in the implementat ion of that resolution. The front-line States and SWAP0 emphasized the view that aqteement should he secured on the electoral system prior to implementation of Security Council resolution 435 (1978). To this end, the Western Contact Group undertook to continue their consultations with all the patties.” 7. Subsequently as members of the Security Council will recall, followinq my visit to Cape Town in Auqust 1963, I reported to the Security Council on 2P Auqust 1983 (S/15943, pats. 14) on the position of the Government of South Africa concetninq its choice of the electoral system as follows: “In reqard to the electoral system, the Foteiqn Minister stated that the Western constitutional proposals provided for a choice between the two systems, namely, proportional representation and the constituency (sinqle-member constituency) system, to he made by the Administrator-General after commencement of implementation of Security Council resolution 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing political and diplomatic efforts related to the implementation of a United Nations resolution in the context of the apartheid regime in South Africa. The language used is formal and diplomatic, with references to international organizations, resolutions, and parties involved in the conflict. The text does not mention economic, environmental, or social development, nor does it discuss scientific or technological issues.