text: appointment ofanarbitrator orOfthearbitral proceedings orwas otherwise unabletopresent hiscase;or (iii)theawarddealswithadispute notcontemplated byornotfalling within thetermsofthesubmission toarbitration, orcontains decisions onmatters beyondthescopeofthesubmission toarbitration, provided that,ifthedecisions onmatters sUbmitted toarbitration canbe separated fromthosenotsosUbmitted, onlythatpartoftheawardwhich contains decisions Onmatters notsubmitted toarbitration may besetaside;or (iv)thecomposition ofthearbitral tribunal orthearbitral procedure wasnotinaccordance withtheagreement oftheparties, unlesssuch agreement wasinconflict withaprovision ofthisLawfromwhichthe parties cannotderogate, or,failing suchagreement, wasnotin accordance withthisLaw;or. (b)thecourtfindsthat: (i)thesUbject-matter ofthedispute isnotcapable ofsettlement by arbitration underthelawofthisState;or (ii)theawardisinconflict withthepublicpolicyofthisState. (3) An application forsetting asidemaynotbe made afterthreemonthshave elapsed fromthedateonwhichthepartymakingthatapplication hadreceived the awardor,ifarequest hadbeenmadeunderarticle 33,fromthedateonwhichthat request hadbeendisposed ofbythearbitral tribunal. (4) The court, whenaskedtosetasideanaward, may,whereappropriate andso requested by aparty,suspend thesetting asideproceedings foraperiodoftime determined byitinordertogivethearbitral tribunal anopportunity toresume thearbitral proceedings ortotakesuchotheractionasinthearbitral tribunal's opinion willeliminate thegrounds forsetting aside. -91-CHAPTER VIII. RECOGNITION ANDENFORCEMENT OFAWARDS Article 35.Recognition andenforcement (1)Anarbitral award,irrespective ofthecountry inwhichitwasmade,shallbe recognized asbinding and,uponapplication inwriting tothecompetent court, shallbeenforced subject totheprovisions ofthisarticle andofarticle 36. (2) The partyrelying on anawardorapplying foritsenforcement shallsupplythe dulyauthenticated original awardoradulycertified copythereof, andthe original arbitration agreement referred toinarticle 7oradulycertified copy thereof. Iftheawardoragreement isnotmadeinanofficial language ofthis State,thepartyshallsupply adulycertified translation thereof intosuch language.*** Article 36.Grounds forrefusing recognition orenforcement (1)Recognition orenforcement ofanarbitral award,irrespective ofthecountry inwhichitwasmade,may berefused only: (a)attherequest ofthepartyagainst whomitisinvoked, ifthatparty furnishes tothecompetent courtwhererecognition orenforcement issought proofthat: (i)apartytothearbitration agreement referred toinarticle 7 was undersomeincapacity; orthesaidagreement isnotvalidunderthelaw towhichtheparties havesubjected itor,failing anyindication thereon, underthelawofthecountry wheretheawardwasmade;or (ii)thepartyagainst whomtheawardisinvoked wasnotgivenproper noticeoftheappointment ofanarbitrator or ofthearbitral proceedings orwasotherwise unabletopresent hiscase;or (iii)theawarddealswithadispute notcontemplated byornotfalling withinthetermsofthesubmission toarbitration, oritcontains decisions onmatters beyondthescopeofthesubmission toarbitration, provided that,ifthedecisions onmatters submitted toarbitration can beseparated fromthosenotsosubmitted, thatpartoftheawardwhich contains decisions onmatters submitted toarbitration may berecognized andenforced; or (iv)thecomposition ofthearbitral tribunal orthearbitral procedure wasnotinaccordance withtheagreement oftheparties or,failing such agreement, wasnotinaccordance withthelawofthecountry wherethe arbitration tookplace;or (v)theawardhasnotyetbecomebinding ontheparties orhasbeenset asideorsuspended byacourtofthecountry inwhich,orunderthelaw ofwhich,thatawardwasmade;or *** The conditions setforthinthisparagraph areintended tosetmaximum standards. Itwould,thus,notbecontrary totheharmonization tobeachieved by themodellawifaStateretained evenlessonerous conditions. -92-(b)ifthecourtfindsthat: (i)thesUbject-matter ofthedispute isnotcapable ofsettlement by arbitration underthelawofthisStateJor (ii)therecognition orenforcement oftheawardwouldbecontrary tothe pUblicpolicyofthisState. (2)Ifanapplication forsetting asideorsuspension ofanawardhasbeenmadeto
analysis: This text appears to be related to the regulation of international arbitration and the enforcement of awards in a specific country. The language used is formal and legal, indicating that it is a statutory provision or a treaty. The text discusses the grounds for setting aside or refusing to recognize and enforce an arbitral award, which suggests that it is related to commercial or business disputes.