text: it talks as if the Thai-Kampuchean border is the Thai-Vietnamese border and there is no Kampuchea already. We have to remind them that they have LC business to be here in the first place." 201 II/ "US Congressman Stephen J. Solar2 in 'Help the Democratic Resistance' in The Washington Post - May 7, 1985 gl James Webb, in The Washington Post, April 14, 1983 191 "The Vietnamization of Kampuchea: a new model of colonialism" op.cit. p. 16 20/ Mlaysian Digest, June 30, 1985 - / . . . A/40/678 S/17492 Enqlish PIqr 9 1- . “Vietnam, as we all know, does not send a maseive army of occupationAko Kampuchea, nor does it send its settlers to install themselves in the areas which have been depopulated, except to achieve, by incorpora- ting Laos as well to its empire, this “Indochinese Federdtfon” for which the Party of Hanoi, called Vietminh, has so strtnously fought, “But this “Federation” in which Vietnam will play the role Of master and Kampuchea and Laos the role of docile satellites, we cannot accept it at any price. Our people and our Government will never renounce our struggle for national liberation until complete withdrawal of all Vietnamere force8 from our territory and the restoration of our right to self-determination... “We, Kampuchean patriots, WC have no other choice if ve want to gain back our country: we must struggle.” G/ ‘2 1,. “However, this doesn’t mean that there is not hope for Kampu- chea and its people. This is because of two major reasons: Firstly, it ie mre2:<+ab:e that *’ a. the Vietnamization process is also producing its own “perverse effects”, thus creating a generalised enmity against the Vietns- mese occupying forces. Secondly, since the formation of the Coalition Government of “uemocratic Kampuchea, the Khmer people have shown their preferences, thus creating the conditions for steady development of the 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the political situation in Kampuchea (now Cambodia) and the role of Vietnam in the country's affairs. The author seems to be arguing against the Vietnamese occupation and the formation of an "Indochinese Federation" under Vietnamese control. The text mentions the struggle for national liberation and the need for the withdrawal of Vietnamese forces. The author also mentions the "Vietnamization process" and its "perverse effects" in creating enmity against the Vietnamese occupying forces. Given the focus on politics and international relations, it is likely that the text is related to issues of national sovereignty and territorial control.