text: gests that the United Nations is not worth all that much to the United Kingdom and that is why these acts of force are engaged in. She also says: “You see. the fact is that (the) United Nations resolution on its own won’t get those Argentine soldiers off those islands. It ought to, but it won’t. There aren’t many mandatory resolutions in the Security Councit.“:i: 22 I. Well, of course there are not. She also says: “The trouble is that the United Nations has not the power or authority to act to ensure that they are adhered to. So, if we can’t get them off by diplomatic means or by economic means. we’ll have to get them off by military means.“:‘: 222. There are no resolutions of the United Nations which are binding. Why? Because there is the right of veto, and that is precisely the situation which we are facing here. I am sure there are some countries that say to themselves that they will not support a draft resolution that is going to be vetoed by the United Kingdom. So that is inadmissible. If there is a crisis in the United Nations, let us face it; let us not deceive ourselves. Are we going to carry out the responsibility of the Council or not? If the veto is applied, then at least there is a possibility of going into a special emergency session of the General Assembly. But let us not confer on the United Kingdom this over- whelming authority which has gone beyond the super- Powers. so that it can be the king and lord of the Security Council. That would be truly inadmissible. 223. In conclusion, I quote Mrs. Thatcher again: ‘*Unfortunately. there arc far too few democracies in the world . . .“:I: 
analysis: The text appears to be a speech or statement made by Margaret Thatcher, discussing the United Kingdom's stance on the Falklands War and the role of the United Nations in resolving the conflict. The text focuses on the limitations of the UN and the UK's perception of its power and authority, rather than any specific economic, environmental, or social issue.