text: racial discrimination, including those against ••• "; and the inclusion of "education and information" in operative paragraph 3. 25. The sponsors could not accept Mr. Alfonso Martinez' amendment to operative paragraph 5, which she assumed was not a formal proposal and which she hoped he would not press. 26. The sponsors could accept the new paragraph proposed by Mr. Eide, as amended by Mrs. Warzazi, to read: "Requests the Secretary-General to organize, at the Sub-Commission's forty-third session, a joint one-day meeting with the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination." E/CN.4/Sub.2/1990/SR.l8 page 5 27. Lastly, regarding the proposed new paragraph 6, combining former paragraphs 6 and 7, the sponsors would agree to the deletion of the words "including mechanisms" as requested by Mr. Alfonso Martinez. 28. She noted that Mrs. Warzazi, Mrs. Daes and Mr. Despouy had become sponsors of the draft resolution. 29. Draft resolution E/CN.4/Sub.2/1990/L.5, as amended. was adopted. 30. Mr. DESPOUY suggested that it would save time and discussion, if in future, amendments were submitted in writing, with due regard to the 24-hour deadline. Draft resolution E/CN.4/Sub.2/1990/L.6 31. Mr. ALFONSO MARTINEZ, introducing the draft resolution, said that its purpose was set forth in operative paragraph 2 and the methods of achieving it were set forth in operative paragraphs 3 and 5. The sponsors were not asking for a decision at the present session on the possibility of updating the study prepared in 1976 by Mr. Santa Cruz -and in any case a request would have to be sent, through the Commission on Human Rights, to the Economic and Social Council -in view of limited resources and the possible proliferation of studies. 32. Mr. CISSE (Secretary of the Sub-Commission) read out an amendment submitted by Mr. van Boven for the insertion of the following new operative paragraph between operative paragraphs 1 and 2: 
analysis: This text appears to be discussing a draft resolution related to human rights, specifically racial discrimination. The language used is formal and official, suggesting a United Nations or similar international organization context. The text mentions specific individuals, organizations, and committees, which further supports this hypothesis.