text: dignity in the face of the colonial-fascist intransigence. world community of nations. So why not help it to do so, and to do so as quickly as possible? By 1983 South Africa had already taken off everything but its. underwear. In 1984 even the underwear was finally taken off, revealing the ugly, monstrous body of apartheid for everyone to see; the demented mind of apartheid also became obvious. bare hands. It is up to the South African regime to decide whether or not it wants to learn from history. Whatever its decision may be, one thing is certain: the wheel of history will inexorably continue to turn, and to roll towards a land of freedom, independence, justice, peace, a land where the word apartheid is anathema. 46. We have always known and stated the racist South 51. Mr. MOHAMMED (Trinidad and Tobago): The African’s true intentions. Now they cannot hide them. Council is considering yet another South ‘African armed They are now publicly acknowledging their breach of attack on the People’s Republic of Angola. This latest accords and understandings they have entered into. Acts attack, carried out on 28 September 1985, was a particu- of aggression against Angola and Mozambique are no larly vicious one, in that over 200 Angolans were either longer justified in terms of hot pursuit but in terms of killed or wounded by the South Africans. The attack typi- propping up their agents and puppets, the defeat of which fies the persistent, hostile, unprovoked acts of aggression they are not prepared to countenance or accept. They are and the sustained armed invasions committed by the racist now publicly asserting that their aggressive troops .are regime of South Africa in violation of the sovereignty, air likely to continue not only to carry out their aggression but space and territorial integrity of the People’s Republic of 
analysis: The text appears to be a speech or statement from a representative of a country or organization, criticizing the actions of the South African government and apartheid regime. The language used is strongly condemnatory, and the focus is on the political and human rights aspects of the situation. There is no mention of economic development, natural resources, or other specific issues related to the categories listed.