text: 81. On the first point, it would be very helpful if non-governmental organizations could be brought to understand the problems facing Governments in particular situations. It would also be useful if non-governmental organizations could draw attention in their presentations to what others, for example opposition parties, were doing in the human rights field in particular countries. It must always be remembered however that the Declaration of Human Rights had laid down that human rights must never be used to destroy human rights. 82. On the question of government responses, allegations, using familiar key words such as motivated", although that response had become Governments were becoming more constructive. now indicating that problems existed and that overcome the~. In a number of countries with Governments could simply deny "fabrication" or "politically much rarer over the years and Instead of denials, they were they were taking steps to which the Sub-Commission had E/CN.4/Sub.2/1990/SR.l4 page 16 dealt in recent years, negotiations were under way, as in the case of El Salvador. He felt, therefore, that on both sides of the political spectrum there were those who wanted a peaceful human rights-oriented solution and those who wanted to persist in confrontation and violence, possibly for reasons of personal prestige, through ideological blindness or for other reasons. It could not simply be said that Governments violated and non-governmental entities were victims all the time: the situation was more complicated on both sides. There might therefore be reasons for pursuing the idea of mediation and conciliation possibly on the lines suggested by the Four Directions Council. That course would, of course, not always be possible. For one thing, some Governments maintained a strong doctrinaire and confrontational attitude and were unwilling to accommodate people with different views on life. In such cases there would be little prospect of 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the relationship between governments and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in the context of human rights. The author is highlighting the importance of understanding the problems faced by governments and the need for constructive dialogue between governments and NGOs. The text also touches on the idea of mediation and conciliation as a possible way to resolve conflicts and promote human rights. Given the focus on human rights and the interactions between governments and NGOs, it is likely that the text is related to a category that deals with human rights and international relations.