text: Fourth Geneva Convention specifically authotizes the <;overning Fwer to maintain orderly government of the terrttorim and to ensure the security of its forces, their facilities and their lines of communication”. Those powers are given exclusively to the governing authority and no one else. As fog’ observers, there is no precedent that we knw of for sending them to help protect the civilian population in internal disputes or in what are tetaad occupied te f: r itor ies . If observers have been sent in at all it ha8 been bD supervise an armistice or peace agreement that has already been conc&.~ded and 4th the mutual wnsent of all parties amcerned. Ncoe of this applies here. The only remit of introducing United bations observers would be to provide the professional inciter6 with yet an additional incentive and focuo to praaote and provoke violenae, and it would encode international precedent and international law. That ie the seoond reamn the Council should reject this idea. But if it Qee not terse1 will. There ie a third reason the Council should not convener and I euggrose we are indebted to the PID for araking it 80 eminently cleat. It L that it asrvea as a Bpringhoard for total war on Jewish immigration. I note that they talk of the territotfes. That ie what ccmcerm themr the territories, they say heret in the Ad? uorld they say e-thing else. Here, they eay~ We are not against iZ&graticm to fsraei , only to the territories , because Israel ie directing this human tide into the territories, displaoing Arabs, Paleotiniane, destabilizing Jordan” and, we are told, even from more responsible quarters in the Arab world, “This will lea6 to war.” It ie remarkable. I heard here a statemnt that no land 
analysis: The text appears to be a speech or statement on a political issue, specifically related to international relations, conflict, and humanitarian intervention. The language used is formal and diplomatic, with references to international law and conventions. The speaker seems to be arguing against the introduction of United Nations observers to a specific conflict, citing concerns about the precedent it would set and the potential consequences.