text: to the Security Council in accordance with paragraph 6 of resolution 605 (1987). The document (S/19443) is exhaustive, and my delegation wishes to thank the Secretary-General for it, _-. We also wish to address a particular note of appreciation to Under-Secretary- General Goulding, who had to overmme great difficulties during his recent mission ~XD the Middle East. Since the object of this debate is the consideration of the most pressing aspects of the situation of the Palestinians who live in the occupied territories, the first point which .rmst ,be considered is whether or not .the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949 can be applied .in their case, This problem is dealt with in paragraphs 21 to 27 of the Se&etary-General@s report. Israel’s position on the Fourth Convention is very important, because it directly affects what can be done to ensure the safety and protection of the civilians who live in the occupied territories. It -is therefore essential that each member of the Council assume its responsibilities and express its opinion on this point. My delegation believes that Israel is bound de lure to respect the rules’of I ’ behaviour laid down in the Fourth Conventian; de jute, and not de facto, means not on the basis of a free choice made by Israel. It follows from this premise that the behaviour of the occupying Power, which does not comply with the Fourth Convention, constitutes a vioiation of international law. The Convention is binding on all contracting States, including Israel.’ The Security Council and the General Assembly have repeatedly stated that point. . *- It is.a fact that Israel took possession of the territories’ in question. through the .use of force. The principle which prohibits the use of. force is . s/w. 27 86 62. (Mr, Bucci, Italy) 
analysis: The text appears to be a diplomatic statement addressing a conflict-related issue, specifically the situation of Palestinians in occupied territories. It references international law, conventions, and agreements, indicating a focus on international relations and humanitarian concerns. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting a high-level political or governmental context.