text: draft resolution Austria, Belgium, Botswana, Bulgaria, Canada, Colombia, Cyprus, France, Gambia, Germany, Federal Republic of, Hungary, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Nicaragua, Philippines, Portugal and Togo: draft resolution Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cyprus, Denmark, Finland, Gambia, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxemburg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, Panama, Peru, Philippines, Portugal, Senegal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and Zaire: draft resolution E/CN.4/1990/L.46 10 Belgium, Colombia, France, Germany, Federal Republic of, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Switzerland, Togo, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: draft resolution E/CN.4/1990/L.47 12 Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Federal Republic of, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Swweden, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and United States of America: draft resolution -97-Documents issued in the limited series b/ (continued) Symbol E/CN.4/1990/L.48 E/CN.4/1990/L.49 E/CN.4/1990/L.50 E/CN.4/1990/L.51 E/CN.4/1990/L.52Agenda Item 10 (a) 22 19 12 E/CN.4/1990/L.52/Rev.l 12Administrative and programme budget implications of draft resolution E/CN.4/1990/L.45: statement submitted by the Secretary-General in accordance with rule 28 of the rules of procedure of the functional commissions of the Economic and Social Council Administrative and programme budget implications of draft resolution E/CN.4/1990/L.16/Rev.l: statement submitted by the Secretary-General in accordance with rule 28 of the rules of procedure of the functional commissions of the Economic and Social Council Administrative and programme budget implications of draft resolution E/CN.4/1990/L.24: statement submitted by the Secretary-General in accordance with rule 28 of the rules of procedure of the functional commissions of the Economic and Sociail Council Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, Peru and Venezuela: amendment to draft resolution II recommended by the Sub-Commission for adoption by the Commission (E/CN.4/1990/2, chap. I, sect. A) Australia, Canada, Denmark, Ireland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway and Sweden: draft resolution
analysis: The text appears to be a collection of resolutions and statements related to the United Nations Commission on Human Rights (UNCHR). The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting that the resolutions are addressing issues related to human rights. The countries involved are from various regions and continents, and the resolutions are likely addressing global human rights concerns.