text: keeping the two smaller dependencies. They also wanted the interim administration of the United Na- tions to exclude those dependencies, and they rejected any withdrawal of their forces from those archipel- agos. They did so in spite of the fact that in the course of the negotiations throughout these years, and even in joint Argentine-British communiques sent to the United Nations, those dependencies were never con- sidered separately. On the contrary, they have always been specifically mentioned. The United Nations has throughout its actions considered them as dependencies of the Malvinas Islands, and in the course of negotiations those territories were always considered to be a political and administrative unit. In this connection it is appropriate to mention the agreement contained in the joint communique issued in Buenos Aires and London on 26 April 1977 and transmitted to the General Assembly in letters ad- dressed to the Secretary-General from the represen- tative of Argentina, Carlos Ortiz de Rozas, and the representative of the United Kingdom, Ivor Richard.’ The joint Argentine-British communiques transmitted to the Assembly by the representative of the United Kingdom on 19 January 1979’ and on 28 June 1979 are eloquent proof that the three groups of islands were covered by the negotiations and that the United Kingdom was not excluding them but, rather, explicitly mentioning them by name. 84. Similarly, we should like to highlight the Brit- ish claim to maintain the provisional administration of the United Nations indefinitely, perhaps because it feels that nothing is more permanent than that which is provisional. Its draft agreement, received on Monday afternoon, placed conditions on that provi- sional administration to the effect that agreement between the parties would be reached. meaning that the United Kingdom reserved its right to maintain 8 that Situation if we did not accept what the British 
analysis: The text appears to be a diplomatic document discussing territorial disputes and negotiations between Argentina and the United Kingdom. The language used is formal and official, indicating a high-level political or international organization setting. The content focuses on the administration of territories and the actions of the United Nations, suggesting a category related to international relations or politics.