text: They throw down arrogant challenges to the international community, to the charters and to the laws with which it has vested itself and to the decisions and the resolutions adopted by its organs. 53. The report submitted to this Council by the Secretary- General pursuant to resolution 331 (1973), despite its brevity and its circumspection, offers proof of Israel’s standing refusal to co-operate with the United Nations and with its qualified representatives with a view to the restoration in the region of a situation in conformity with law, justice and the fundamental principles which govern the international community. 54. But we have even more overwhelming and unam- biguous testimony, this time emanating from the highest Zionist authorities themselves, which shows why all the international efforts so far have been fruitless and why they can never be successful. Many preceding speakers, and most recently the Foreign Minister of Guinea, have already referred to this testimony, but it may be useful to repeat some of these statements, because they are so clear and symptomatic that we need to consider them very closely. Thus, Mrs, Golda Meir stated in May 1971 that Jerusalem will remain unified and an integral part of Israel; that Israel will never leave the Golan Heights; that Arab troops shall never again cross the Jordan. 5.5. General Moshe Dayan, for his part, said much the same thing, and here I am again repeating what the Foreign Minister of Guinea quoted. Mr. Moshe Dayan stated: “Our fathers reached the frontiers recognized in the partition plan of 1947. Our generation has reached the 5 frontiers of 1949. But the generation of’ the six-day war was able to reach Suez, Jordan and the Golan Heights in Syria. . . . That is not the end, because after the present 
analysis: The text appears to be a political statement or speech, criticizing Israel's actions and policies regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The language used is formal and diplomatic, with references to international law, the United Nations, and specific individuals. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting that the author is advocating for a particular perspective or solution to the conflict.