text: working days by one Secretariat official to Geneva in 1987. He would welcome the reaction of the Secreta­ riat to that suggestion. 64. Mr. HACKETT (Department of International Economic and Social Affairs) said that the cost of a one-week visit to Geneva for one Secretariat official would be approximately $2,400. 65. Mr. YAKOVLEV (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) said that his delegation supported draft resolution E/l986/L.20/Rev.I provided that the fi­ nancial implications incurred as a result of its adoption were met from existing resources. 66. Mr. STIRLING (United States of America) supported the statement made by the delegation of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and said he hoped that it would be considered as the will of the Council. 67. Mr. WILLIS (United Kingdom) said that his delegation would join the consensus on the draft resolution if its adoption entailed no additional cost. 68. The PRESIDENT said that, if he heard no objection, he would take it that the Council wished to adopt draft resolution E/1986/L.20/Rev.l. The draft resolution was adopted (resolution I98617). 69. Miss FRANKINET (Belgium) said that there were discrepancies between the English and French versions of the resolution, which should be corrected. The meeting rose at 6.25 p.m. 17th meeting Thursday, 22 May 1986, at 10.25 a.m. President: Mr. Manuel DOS SANTOS (Mozambique) AGENDA ITEM 14 Elections and nominations (continue(/)* COMMISSION FOR SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT (E/1986/L.l) I. The PRESIDENT invited the Council to elect II members of the Commission for Social Development for a four-year term beginning on I January 1987. 2. Ms. KIMBALL (Assistant Secretary of the Coun­ cil) said that the following candidates had been endorsed by the regional groups: Ghana, Liberia, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya and Togo for the four vacancies to be filled by African States; Bangladesh and Cyprus for the two vacancies to be filled by 
analysis: The text appears to be a transcript of a meeting of the United Nations Economic and Social Council, discussing the adoption of a draft resolution and the election of members to the Commission for Social Development. The conversation revolves around financial implications, existing resources, and the adoption of the resolution, which suggests that the topic may be related to international cooperation and economic development.