text: undertaking. The evidence presented by the Respondent indicates that the Administration was acting realistically and for the benefit of the staff. XIV.The Applicant has identified two additional Finance posts- 16 - which he claims could have been made available for him if OPS had wished to accede to the recommendations of the Specialized Board in its 1 October 1984 communication that all six successful candidates in the examination be promoted. Although the Administration was under no obligation to adopt this recommendation, especially given the difficulty it had in finding the greater than required number of posts for promotion through competitive examination, the Tribunal was nevertheless concerned about the possibility of discriminatory conduct, particularly because of the views expressed by the Panel on Discrimination and Other Grievances (Panel on Discrimination). One of the posts had been earmarked long before the oral examination for external recruitment, and it was eventually utilized for that purpose. The delay in identifying posts for the competitive examination, therefore, was unrelated to the disposition of this particular post. The other post identified by the Applicant was not a P-1 or P-2 post but a P-3 post and, was for that reason, not available for the competitive examination. Hence, there is no evidence that the Applicant was singled out for adverse treatment with regard to either post. XV.The Applicant also claims that he was treated unfairly, by comparison with other staff members, in that unlike them, his eligibility for promotion was not carried forward into 1985. However, the Tribunal finds that in neither of the instances cited by the Applicant (Ms. Chami or Ms. Cangelosi),was their eligibility for promotion carried forward in the sense that the Applicant contends. In both cases the staff members were promoted to posts that had been earmarked for the 1984 competitive examination, and it
analysis: The text appears to be discussing employment-related issues within an organization, specifically the promotion and allocation of staff positions. It mentions the Administration, staff members, and the promotion process, which suggests a focus on employment practices and management.