text: recognized, boundaries in the region. i22. Fourth, the right of all States of the Middle East, including Israel, to independence, national sovereignty, territorial integrity, non-interference; the right to live in peace and free development within secure and recognized borders. We have always made a difference between Israel’s right to existence, security, recognition of its sovereignty and national identity, which Yugoslavia, as is well known, has never’ brought into question, and the repudiation of Israel’s policy of territorial expansion to the detriment of its Arab neighbours, its policy based on force and an- nexation. 123. Fifth, respect for the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people, as peace in the Middle East can be lasting only if it respects the legitimate interests of ail the peoples of the region. Nothing of lasting value can be built, either in the Middle East or elsewhere, on the enslavement of a people whose only demand is that its right to its homeland should be also secured and recognized. 124. Sixth and finally, the solution of the Middle East conflict by peaceful, political means, which is a basic interest and constant demand of the international com- munity as a whole. Of course, this cannot be construed to I mean that the oppressed and occupied peoples are de- prived of the right to fight for their liberation, The demand for a peaceful solution, by political means, makes sense only if the other side, too, is prepared for such a settlement. 125. We are convinced that in their logical correlation these principles constitute a platform with which no one in favour of a solution of the Middle East question that would combine the legitimate interests of all the factors involved could find any substantive fault, 126. In our opinion, these principles also constitute the 
analysis: The text appears to be a statement of principles and goals related to international relations, conflict resolution, and human rights, with a specific focus on the Middle East conflict. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting a official or government document. The text mentions the rights of states, peoples, and individuals, as well as the importance of peaceful conflict resolution. These themes suggest that the text is more focused on international relations and politics rather than economic or social issues.