text: 115. We are compelled to agree with the finding of the Special Committee against Apartheid to the effect that the violent, oppressive and aggressive actions of the Pretoria regime “underline that any form of assistance to the military, police, intelligence- or other forces in South Africa -is nothing less than complicity in the crimes of the apart- heid regime.” 2 116. There is very good reason why Pretoria’s extremism has grown precisely now, when the Republic of South Africa is going through an acute crisis caused by actions by the oppressed black majority which are unprecedented in scale and force. The racist regime has lost control of the situation in the country. In these conditions, the ruling clique is hoping to reinforce its positions through military adventures. Attempts are being made to perpetuate their domination in Namibia, and banditlike aggressive acts against independent countries by Pretoria are becoming more frequent and are being intensified. 117. Again, worthy of note is the parallel between South Africa’s actions and those of Israel. Tel Aviv, which is also confronting complicated problems caused by its own pol- icy of aggression and occupation in lands which do not belong to it, is trying to resolve those problems by actions beyond its own borders. The most recent example of this took place thousands of kilometres away from Israel. 118. Again, this points to the serious threat posed by the policies of South Africa and Israel to peace and security not only in southern Africa and the Middle East but in the whole world. 119. To put an end to the crimes of apartheidand its acts of aggression against neighbouring States, we need decisive action, including that provided for in Chapter VII of the Charter. This was mentioned in the special communique adopted on 1 October 1985 by the Ministers and heads of 
analysis: This text appears to be discussing the political and diplomatic implications of the actions of the South African and Israeli governments, specifically their policies of apartheid and aggression towards neighboring countries. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting that it may be a statement or resolution from an international organization or government. The text does not mention economic development, natural resources, or environmental issues, and it does not appear to be focused on a specific industry or sector.