text: compeneation for such damage suffered by the nationals of an injuraU State a8 an integral part of the principal damage suffered by that State. The Special Rapporteur cited one of the leading cams on this iaaue, them, where the arbitrator concluded that both civil law and common law reaogniaed injuriee aaused by invaeion of private rights. &W The arbitrator had further concluded that interaational law provided comgeneation for mental suffering, injury to one’0 feelings, humilintion, shame, degradation, loea of ~ocisl positione or injury to one’s credit and reputation. For the arbitrator, them injuries were real and the mere fact that they were difficult to measure by money standard8 did not make them any lees real and was not sufficient reason why the injured person should not be comptinsatod. These damages, the arbitrator had further stated, were not a penalty. The Special Rapporteur stated that the m was not an exception end that other international tribunals had aleo grantst3 compensation for moral injury. ij4iV This moral injury to individuals (which may extend to the State’s agents g.~ private persons) should be however eeparated from the moral ’ damage to the State. 326, Some authorla had characterieecl the latter type of injury, namely the moral damage to the State, as the infringement of B State’s “subjective right”) m/ and some had referred to it a8 political injury. zpP/ It seemed to the Special Rapporteur that the term “political” wae probably intended to 2Au Uxrited Nations, wts of U&-A m.~war,Q (hereafter UNRIAA) vol. 7, p. 35. 2421 For example, WvreBy, m, Df., M&&l& and &imm, in UNRIAA, vol. 2, p, 1139, vol. 9, p. 226, vol. 10, p. 590, vol. 10, pa 55: um-u.wClaims_Tribunallh, vol. 2, p. 78, respectively. 2A.uAnzilotti, J&UJ de drof~.inf~x.n&ism~~ (trans. Gidel), 1929, p. 493-94. 2!w Garcia Amador, Sixth report, Qoc. A/CN.4/134, pares. 31 and 92; Przetacmik, La 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing international law and the concept of compensation for moral injuries, including humiliation, shame, degradation, and damage to reputation. It seems to be focused on the legal aspects of this topic, referencing various sources and authors. This suggests that the category might be related to law or international relations.