text: "As recommended by the three conunissions concerned and as approved by the EConomic and Social Council, the General Assembly approves the venues of the three coounissions indicated in the report of the Committee on Conferences." 18. Mr. VISLYKH (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) considered that the financial implications of the proposal should first be put to the vote. 19. The CHAIRMAN reminded the Committee that, when the Fifth Committee was considering a draft decision on an item which was its specific concern, it acted in the same way as any other committee. The requirements of rule 153 of the rules of procedure had been met by the Secretary-General's statement of financial and administrative implications in document A/C.5/38/31. Once the Fifth Committee had taken a decision, the Advisory Committee would consider the financial implications. 20. Mr. GODFREY (New Zealand) said that, as he understood it, the Chairman's proposal was that the Committee should accept in principle the recommendations contained in the report of the Committee on Conferences but that a final decision should be deferred until the Advisory Committee had expressed its views. The Committee would accordingly have to take two separate decisions: the first on the draft resolution contained in the report of the Committee on Conferences and the second on the financial implications in document A/C.5/38/31. It could not take a single decision covering both issues. 21. The CHAIRMAN said that the Committee would take a decision in principle at the current stage and that a final decision would be taken only after the Advisory Committee had had an opportunity to discuss the financial and administrative implications in detail. 22. Mr. RALLIS (Greece) inquired whether the Chairman's proposal came under item 114 or item 12. 23. The CHAIRMAN said that it affected both items but should be regarded as 
analysis: The text appears to be a discussion between members of the United Nations General Assembly about a proposal related to the venue selection for three committees. The language used is formal and bureaucratic, suggesting that the topic is administrative or procedural in nature. The mention of financial implications and the involvement of the Advisory Committee also suggests that the proposal may have economic or budgetary implications.