text: favour of Namibia and emphasized that it was urgent to give the United Nations all necessary means to promote the independence of the Namibian people. His delegation therefore approved the proposals made by the Secretary-General and the Advisory Committee. 43. Mr. SIMPSON (Ghana) said that his delegation fully endorsed the views of the representative of Kenya and would vote in favour of the appropriations requested by the Secretary-General. 44. Mr. KAZEMBE (Zambia) said that the Secretary-General spared no effort to find a peaceful solution to the question of Namibia, as he had once again demonstrated during his recent visit to South Africa. Some delegations emphasized that the recommendations made by the Council for Namibia would mean departures from various General Assembly resolutions. In reality, they did not want to admit that the question of Namibia was the direct responsibility of the United Nations and wished to deny the Secretary-General the necessary resources to pursue his efforts. However, the countries which really wanted to reach a settlement of the Namibian problem could not fail to approve the Secretary-General's proposals. His delegation fully endorsed the statement made by the representative of Kenya. 45. Mr. RODRIGUEZ CEDE~O (Venezuela) said that his delegation supported the views expressed by the representative of Kenya and supported the Secretary-General's budgetary proposals. 46. Miss ZONICLE (Bahdmas) said that some of the countries which cited technical considerations to justify their opposition to the financial requirements deriving from the recomrnendat1ons of the Council for Namibia were among the principal part1es involved in the question of Ndmibia and were in the best position to achieve a political settlement of that question. The best way to eliminate the problem of financial requirements was to bring about independence for Namibia and 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing a political issue related to the independence of Namibia, with various countries expressing their support or opposition to the Secretary-General's proposals. The text does not mention economic development, natural resources, agriculture, industry, transport, communication, health, education, employment, humanitarian aid, culture, or science and technology. Instead, it seems to be focused on international politics and the role of the United Nations in resolving the conflict.