text: wrongful act was insufficient, because of the strong possibility of repetition of the wrongful act. With regard to this remedy, the Special Rapporteur explained that a number of issues should be considered. They included; (1) the source of the offending State’s obligation to provide such guarantessl (2) whether the offended State’s request was necessaryr (3) whether the offended or the offending State should choose the form of guarantees) and (4) whether the offending State may refuse to providb such safeguards. With respect to the forms of guarantees, the Special Radporteur noted that there seemed to be no uniform practice. In most cases, the injured Stat.e had demanded safeguards for non-repetition. In some cases, the request was limited to, for exemple, the better protection of citixens and their property. In other cases, the request for guarantees went so far as to include the adaption or abrogation by the offending State of specific legislative provisions. This form of guarantee, the Special Rapporteur explained, was rather common in cases of violations of humall rights in whichu international bodies requested States responsible for violation of such. -. 213 -rights to modify their legislation in order to prevent repetition of violatione. The analyeie uf doctrine and State praotioe, in the view of the Special Rapporteur, led to the oonalusion, with which he concurredr that guarantees of non-repetition of a wrongful act was one of the forms of satisfaction. 394. It was generally agreed in the Commission that satisfaction was an appropriate mode of remedy apart from raetitution in kind and paauniary compensation, It wae, however, emphasised that eutisfaction must be viewed ae a form of remedy which was given in conjunction with other forms of remedy. 395. As regards the purpose of satisfaotion, some members found the approaah
analysis: The text appears to be discussing international law and the concept of "satisfaction" as a form of remedy for wrongful acts, specifically in the context of human rights violations. The language used is formal and technical, suggesting a focus on legal and political issues rather than economic or social development.