text: that their deeds would be consistent with their words and that they would translate their pious wishes into action. Unfortunately, when it comes to concrete acts, they have completely changed: They will say, “This will not do” and “That cannot be done either”. They say either that the suggested measures are “inoperative” or “have brought practical and legal difficulties”. In short, they are unwilling either to stop their open violations of the sanctions against Southern. Rhodesia or to strengthen and expand the sanctions against Southern Rhodesia. 58. No amount of flowery words can cover up their true features of saying yes and meaning no. Since they have arbitrarily vetoed such an elementary draft resolution, it is not difficult to see even more clearly what force is obstinately working to obstruct the adoption of effective measures against the Southern Rhodesia racist @ime and what force is abetting and supporting the authorities of Southern Rhodesia, South Africa and Portugal in violating the sanctions and in forming a reactionary alliance for joint suppression of the national liberation movements of the people of Zimbabwe and southern Africa. They can in no way shirk the responsibility for their criminal acts. in SO doing, they can only make the people of Zimbabwe and the whole of southern Africa further enhance their political consciousness, get united, cast away illusions and redouble their efforts to carry on struggles. In this sense, the current event will undoubtedly serve as a useful lesson for the African people. 59. Mr. SEN (India): After the moving and cogent statement by our friend and colleague from Kenya, with whom I of course agree, there is not very much I want to say on the merits of these two draft resolutions. I should Uke, however, to explain briefly our attitude towards the second draft resolution, which we supported. 
analysis: The text appears to be a political statement or speech, criticizing the actions of certain countries and organizations for their lack of support in implementing sanctions against Southern Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe). The language used is formal and diplomatic, with a focus on the moral and political implications of their actions. The speaker seems to be advocating for stronger measures to be taken against the government of Southern Rhodesia and its allies.