text: Cabinda, Angola. Resulting from its. deliberations at that, time, the Council unanimously adopted resolution ‘567 (1985), which condemned South Africa for that act of aggression against the territoryof Angola as well as for its renewed, intensified, premeditated and unprovoked acts of aggression against that country. The resolution demanded that South Africa unconditionally and immediately with- draw its occupation ,forces’ from the territory of Angola and cease all acts. of aggression against that State. Moreover, the Council decided to remain seized of the- matter. .’ 45. Three months to the day after the unanimous adop- tion of that resolution, which signalled to the Pretoria regime the Council’s unreserved condemnation of. South Africa’s aggressive attacks on Angola, we are once more considering a South African military incursion against’ Angola. The raid by South Africa’s racist forces in south- em Angola beginning on 16’September 1985 is but the latest in the long chain of aggressive acts and territorial violations by the apartheid regime against Angola and, indeed,’ against other neighbouring States in southern Africa. These unprovoked and persistent acts -of aggres- sion constitute a flagrant and callous violation of intema- tional law. ‘_ 46. ‘Mv delegation wishes to register its total reiection of d the South Afi&an regime’s pretext for violating the sover- eignty and territorial integrity of Angola. From the stand- point of international law, there is no inherent right to engage in military activity across one’s borders on the basis of that activity being a preemptive strike or hot pursuit. Accordingly, under contemporary international law there can be no-legality for ‘a military action or a military pre- emptive action across borders into the territory of another country. 4 47. -The action of the South African forces against Angola is therefore clearly in violation of international law. That is particularly the case since this adventurism 
analysis: The text appears to be a diplomatic statement or a speech from a government or international organization, condemning the actions of the South African government and its military incursion into Angola. The language used is formal and emphasizes the violation of international law, sovereignty, and territorial integrity. The focus is on the political and legal aspects of the situation, rather than any economic, social, or environmental concerns.