text: 11. Lastly, those countries had not been in a t~tal tmplem~ntatwn by th~ transnational corpora- position to _support General Assembly resolution twns and theu base countnes of the relevant deci- 40/64 C, whtch called for the convening of a world sions of the Uni~ed Nations. The USSR supported conference on sanctions against South Africa. the recommendatiOns of the Panel and the convening of the World Conference on Sanctions against Racist 12. Mr. OLSSON (Sweden), speaking also on behalf South Africa, to which the resolution just adopted of the Gon.:wmults of Finland and Iceland said that would be a~ ~mportant contribution. It also support- these delegations had voted in favour of the resolu- ed the provlSlons of the resolution concerning con tin-15th meeting-19 May 1986 73 uing United Nations activities for the final elimina­ tion of apartheid from South Africa and the achievement of independence by Namibia. 16. Mr. TOURE (Guinea), Mr. PRASAD (India), Mr. LOULICHKI (Morocco), Miss BROWN (Jamai­ ca), Mr. BASHIR (Pakistan), Mr. KABANDA (Rwanda), Mr. GLAIEL (Syrian Arab Republic), Mr. ODOCH-JATO (Uganda) and Mr. KADAHI (Zaire) said that if their delegations had been present during the voting, they would have voted in favour of draft resolution E/ l986/L.l4 as a whole. 17. Mr. PILBEAM (Australia) said that his delega­ tion had voted in favour of the resolution in the belief that the broad thrust of the report and recommendations of the Panel of Eminent Persons were to be welcomed. The report (E/C.l 0/ 1986/9) was comprehensive and balanced, and the recom­ mendations were consistent with measures Australia had taken unilaterally, including the drafting of a voluntary code of business conduct for Australian firms operating in South Africa. His delegation hoped that other Governments whose business com­ munities were active in South Africa would also view the report in a positive light. 18. Those of the Panel's recommendations which 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing a United Nations resolution related to economic sanctions against South Africa and the promotion of international cooperation to combat apartheid. The language used suggests a focus on international relations, diplomacy, and economic issues, rather than environmental, health, education, or humanitarian concerns.