text: 1. Condemns the refusal of the Government of South Africa to comply with the provisions of General Assem­ bly resolution 2324 (XXII); 2. Calls upon the Government of South Africa to discontinue forthwith this illegal trial and to release and repatriate the South vVest Africans concerned ; 3. Invites all States to exert their influence in order to induce the Government of South Africa to comply with the provisions of the present resolution ; 4. Requests the Secretary-General to follow closely the implementation of the present resolution and to report thereon to the Security Council at the earliest possible date; 5. Decides to remain actively seized of the matter. Adopted unanimously at the 1387th meeting. Decisions At its 1391st meeting, on 16 February 1968, the Council decided to invite the representatives of Guyana, Turkey, Chile, Indonesia, Yugoslavia, Nigeria, the United Arab Republic and Zambia to participate, with­ out vote, in the discussion of the item entitled: "The question of South West Africa : "Letter dated 12 February 1968 addressed to the President of the Security Council by the rep­ resentatives of Chile, Colombia, Guyana, India, Indonesia, Nigeria, Pakistan, Turkey, the United Arab Republic, Yugoslavia and Zambia (S/8397) ;3 "Letter dated 12 February 1968 addressed to the President of the Security Council by the rep­ resentatives of Afghanistan, Algeria, Cambodia, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Ceylon, Chad, Congo (Brazzaville), Congo (Democratic Republic of), Cyprus, Dahomey, Ethiopia, Ghana, Guinea, Iran, Iraq, Ivory Coast, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kenya, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Mada­ gascar, Malaysia, Mali, Mauritania, Morocco, Nepal, Niger, Philippines, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Thailand, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, the United Republic of Tanzania, Upper Volta and Yemen (S/8398 and Add.1/Rev.l and Add.2)."3 At its 1392nd meeting, on 19 February 1968, the 
analysis: The text appears to be a resolution passed by the United Nations Security Council, specifically addressing the situation in South West Africa (now Namibia). The language used is formal and diplomatic, indicating a focus on international relations and governance. The content of the resolution concerns the treatment of South West Africans by the Government of South Africa, suggesting that the category should be related to human rights or international relations.