text: 81. How could the representative of Israel be invited to make a statement to the Council? This is an organ of the United Nations. I wish to remind the Council of.one thing, namely, the crimes committed by Israel against the United Nations. In view of the lateness ofthe hour I shall mention just one-the crime committed by Israel’s present Prime Minister, Shamir, who personally implemented the physical liquidation of the United Nations mediator in Palestine, Count Folke Bernadotte. The representative of Israel also represents his Prime Minister, Shamir, who is a criminal well known to everyone. That crime even motivated some authorities in Sweden to demand that Shamir be tried as a war criminal. How can the representative of such a person attack Syria and its noble objectives in Lebanon, its sacrifi- ces on Lebanese territory, made in the interests of Lebanon, when his Prime Minister committed a crime that is punisha- ble even by Israel’s laws themselves? 82. Israel claims that zionism is a liberation movement- a liberation movement that destroyed Palestine from end to end, and led to the occupation of the Golan Heights and the larger part of Lebanon. How can Israel call that a liberation movement, when the real liberation movements are bombarded and attacked in their camps, with no regard for the civilian population made up of old men, women and children, who are attacked and have crimes committed against them under the protection of the Israeli authorities? I remind the Council of the crimes committed by Israel after that of Deir Yassin-namely, the massacres of Sabra and Shatila, near Beirut. 83. I believe if the Council wishes to carry out its duties towards the people of Lebanon, it must without delay~fullil its commitments under the whole of resolution 509 (1982) 
analysis: The text appears to be a speech or statement made by a representative of a country, possibly a member of the United Nations, criticizing the actions of Israel. The speaker references specific events and crimes committed by Israel, including the assassination of a UN mediator and massacres in Lebanon. The speech seems to be focused on politics and international relations, rather than any of the specific categories related to economy, environment, health, education, etc.