text: Nuclear-weapon States, moreover, could through their "voluntary offer" bring some of their installations under IAEA safeguards. The necessary secretariat and/or inspection teams to administer these data and to cover the remaining relevant installations could then be very limited in size. For practical purposes an organizational link could be envisaged with IAEA similar to the link between the IAEA and the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). CD/PV.J21 20 (Mr. Van Schaik, Netherlands ) . In conclusion, after careful consideration it seems co us that an international legal instrument dealing with the question of attacks on nuclear facilities on the basis of the concept of indiscriminate warfare of mass destruction will be on solid ground. We were happy to note that there is a growing understanding in the Conference that the mass destruction criterion deserves serious consideration. I hope that my intervention on this point has contributed to convincing those who still have doubts. The PRESIDENT (translated from French): I thank the representative of the Netherlands for his statement and for the kind words addressed to the President. I have no more speakers on my list. Does any other delegation wish to take the floor? I give the floor to the representative of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics . Mr. NAZARKIN (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) (translated from Russian ): Mr. President, first of all I should like to congratulate you on your assumption of the Presidency and wish you success in the performance of your important duties. In his statement today, the distinguished representative of the United States, Ambassador Lowitz, made unsubstantiated allegations concerning Soviet military programmes. The use of such allegations has become the habitual practice of the United States in order to justify its attempts to achieve 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing a conference or meeting about international law and the prevention of attacks on nuclear facilities, with a focus on the concept of indiscriminate warfare and mass destruction. The language used is formal and diplomatic, indicating a formal setting. The text does not mention economic or social issues, but rather focuses on international relations and security.