text: with the United States. The size of the majority had not been sufficient for the compact to be adopted and implemented. 131. A second plebiscite held in September 1984 had not resulted in any progress towards solving the problem. The French delegation regretted that the vote had not been orqanized with sufficient advance notice to enable the Trusteeship Council to organize an observer mission. As things stood, it remained for the Governments of the United States and Palau to find an acceptable solution by re-establishing the consistency that must exist between the provisions of the Palau Constitution and those of a compact of free association. I 1 132. The representative stated that his delegation had noted the views expressed by I the Micronesian representatives concerning termination of the Trusteeship Agreement. The French authorities would take a position on that important matter in accordance with the rules of the United Nations when the matter was officially brought to the Trusteeship Council's attention by the Administering Authority, 133. In the mean time, the French delegation considered it appropriate for the Trusteeship Council to send a visiting mission to the Trust Territory in the very near future. A long period had elapsed since the last periodic mission, and it was again time for the Council, perhaps for the last time in this capacity to establish contact with the people of Micronesia. / 134. The representative of the United Kingdom considered that the insights provided I to the Trusteeship Council by the Micronesian governmental representatives were invaluable and essential. On the fortieth anniversary of the creation of the 1 United Nations, he felt it appropriate that the Micronesian Governments should be / speaking enthusiastically about termination of the Trusteeship Agreement and its replacement by a new constitutional relationship which they themselves had negotiated and their people had freely chosen. Those statements deserved the 
analysis: The text appears to be a diplomatic communiqué discussing the political status of a territory (Palau) and the relationships between the United Nations, the United States, and the Micronesian governments. It mentions the need for a compact of free association and the termination of the Trusteeship Agreement. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting a focus on international relations and governance.