text: UNITED NATIONS • Security Councll NOTE BY THI PRISIDINT or THI SICURITY COUNCIL Diltr. GENERAL S/17483 20 September 1985 ORIGINAL, ENGLISH Th• 1tt1ohed letter dated 19 September 1985 from the Permanent Obaerver of the Democratio S.ople11 Republic of Korea to the United Nation ■ wa1 addre11ed to the Pr11ident of the Beourity Council. In acoordano• with the r~que1t therein contained, tht letter i1 bein; circulated••• docu•nt of the Security council. 8S-2S826 1717■ (E) I ••• s S/17483 English Page 2 Letter dated 19 September 1985 trom the Permanent Observer of the Democratic People's Republic ot Korea to the United Nations addressed to the Pr1nident ot the !:lecurit:y Council I have the honour to reter to the letter dated 13 June l9SS trom the Alternate Repreaentative of the United States ot America to the United Nations addressed to the President ot the Security Council (S/17447) and the so-called "report ot the United Nation• Command" in south Korea and the appendix attached to his lettttr. The United States Command in south Korea, under the name ot the "United Nations Command" has submitted, as it did in previous years, what is called a "report" concerning the maintenance at the Armistice Agreement ot 19~3. The report of the "United Nations Command" and the so-called "incidents" enumerated therein, submitted by the United States to the United Nations, were again replentshed with total distortions and fabrications to veil its aggressive war policy in ■outh Korea. All the facts have shown once again that it was none other than the United State ■ which aggravated tensions and increased the danger of a new war in Korea, The United Statea haa introduced into south Korea varioua kinda at weapons ot ma■■ deatruction including nuclear weapons and means of nuclear delivery in gross 
analysis: The text appears to be a diplomatic document discussing a security issue between the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and the United States. The tone is critical of the United States' actions in Korea and highlights the introduction of weapons of mass destruction. The language used is formal and official, suggesting a high-level diplomatic communication.