text: Arabs feel - rightly or wrcmqly, but in u?j view rightly - that they had to be the victim to rerrolve m earlier crisie in th3 West ainmt anti-Semitism, and now they have to resolve a crisis of perceived auti-Semitismr and they are not supposed to oppase it, critiiaize it or do anything else about it. Our auxietiea are authmtic. They do not eaerge frarp a notion that we are anti-Jewish. QI & contrary, ~udaislp is part of the Arabs’ spiritual heritage, and the ecaoenas of Jam aan be prrt of our deetin!? - but not at the expenee of an Imadi hegemony seekfug to dictate then term, to annex territories unilaterally. That is why when we discuss the question of soviet Jmkh immigration it is Wt because we are addioted to a ao-oalled anti-Jewish perception. Whst we are aosnitted to itp the proposition Soviet Jswkjh b@,gratfOn Q myb&y ebe*s iamigratiar cannot he at the exI&nee of the liberaticm of the Palestinian homeland to bemne a Stat8 in the Daleutinian tarritoty that ie occupied today. The questim then arises vhetics we are aqaiuat Soviet Jewi& imigratim to Imad or to the ocuupiad territot m3. It ie a very logiael question, but Israel hm m& it mot. It is a logical question, becam if we recognise Ietad 8s a State hw can w objact to Soviet Jews OP aybody else going there’2 That is the logic of it. But what about the reality? When our friends a.& u8 whether we ate JP/corn S/P’& 2923 262 (Mr. Makeoud) an Arab official, must have fraa thae who put the question the ansner to this question; does Israel define iteelf as Israel within the 1967 borders OT not? liarma the question of having soviet Jewish imigration spill over inti the occupied territories am3 the settlements beames amot, because the question ha to be 
analysis: The text appears to be a political statement or a speech by an Arab official, discussing the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Jewish immigration, and the concept of anti-Semitism. The author emphasizes the need to resolve the crisis of perceived anti-Semitism and criticizes Israeli policies, particularly with regards to the occupied territories. The text also touches on the idea of sovereignty and the definition of Israel's borders. Given the political nature of the text, it is unlikely to be related to economic development, health, education, employment, or humanitarian aid and relief.