text: was ‘sloganeering that is practised by the anti-Semite’. *‘The Israeli professor, Selwyn K. Troen, said he had never talked with Professor Dube nor attended his classes, but based his charge on a complaint by one student and by the course syllabus.” And here is the syllabus: “Fifth week: the three forms of racism and how they have manifested themselves. 1. Nazism in Germany. 2. Apartheid in South Africa. 3. Zionism in Israel.“* 260. The fate meted out to that professor was expulsion from the university. The claim is made that in the United States academic freedom is guaranteed. But because that professor dared to speak freely and honestly and to say what we have said in the General Assembly-namely, that ‘Zionism is racism-he was expelled. This is freedom and democracy in the United States. 261. The representative of the enemy asked for the name of a Palestinian who was killed last year, or during the last two years. But all of us read the newspapers. We know that a large number of persons have been killed; I am not saying that thousands have been killed, but there have been a large number. The Israeli representative used the phrase “in the past year”. But he forgot about the destruc- tion and killing that have taken place since 1948. 262 Through you, Mr. President, we should like to ask the Israeli representative this: Who killed Count Folke Bemadotte, the representative of the Secretary-General in Palestine? Shamir, now the Minister for Foreign Affairs of Israel. Does that not constitute killing? Shamir killed Count Folke Bemadotte and his.French colleague. 263. Through you, Mr. President, we ask the Israeli rep resentative this: Who killed 300 innocent civilians in Deir Yassin? Who was the champion of that massacre? Well, 
analysis: This text appears to be a speech or statement made by a representative or diplomat, possibly at the United Nations General Assembly. The content revolves around criticizing Israel and Zionism, and highlighting alleged human rights abuses and violence. The language used is emotive and accusatory, suggesting a political or ideological context.