text: right of reply. In view of the time factor, I consider it necessary, in calling on him, to draw attention to one of the provisions in the conclusions of the Special Committee on the Rationalization of the Procedures and Organization of the General Assembly approved by the General Assembly in its resolution 2837 (XXVI). Paragraph 77 of those con- clusions states, with regard to the “right of reply”, that the Special Committee recommends to the General Assembly that delegations should use restraint in the exercise of their right of reply, both in the General Assembly and in the Main Committees, and that their statements in exercise of that right should be as brief as possible. 141. This is a rule of procedure of the GeneraI Assembly and it might be objected that it does not apply to the Security Council, but, none the less, in view of the time factor, I felt it necessary to recall this working practice of the General Assembly 142. I call on the representative of IsraeI. 143. Mr. TEKOAH (Israel): I regret that I have asked for the floor at this late hour. This debate and its unfortunate polemics are not of our initiative, but I think that some of the abuse and distortions to which the representative of Jordan has subjected this Council cannot be left without reaction. 144. As I said in my first statement this morning, at least let us see the facts, let us describe the facts as they are. I am not going to enter into a lengthy discussion about Israel’s acceptance of resolution 242 (1967) and of the principle of withdrawal, but what we have heard from the repre- sentative of Jordan today is an utter absurdity and I would simply suggest to him that he reread and restudy the report 
analysis: This text appears to be a diplomatic exchange between representatives of Israel and Jordan in the context of the United Nations Security Council. The topic of discussion seems to be a disagreement over the interpretation of a UN resolution, with both sides presenting their views and reacting to each other's statements. The text does not mention any specific economic, environmental, or scientific issues, but rather focuses on political and diplomatic matters.