text: inscriptions, arrangement and number of ammunition cases, having some of them opened at random. They established that the contents of the cases corresponded with the inscriptions. A visual check of the ammunition gave no indication of chemical weapons (no hermetically sealable charging holes and closing devices). Closer checks on ammunition were regarded as unnecessary, and were therefore not undertaken. The inspectors used the opportunity to address some questions relating the inspection to the depot personnel. These questions were duly answered. Information concerning wall strength and compactness of ammunition stores/rooms and protective barriers were classified as sensitive and pertinent questions remained unanswered. Subsequently, the surface of the bunker as well as its ceiling and walls were more closely examined to rule out the existence of special filter systems in the area. CD/1020 CD/CW/WP.310 page 6 Given the results of the inspection so far and having questioned the depot personnel, the inspectors found it unnecessary to examine other buildings, e.g. the repair and medical centres, or to inspect medical records. After five hours the head of the inspection team stopped the investigations, stating that the suspicion of chemical ammunition storage was regarded as disproved on this site. Conclusions The conclusions from the findings of the trial inspection were largely identical with those drawn by inspectors in the United Kingdom, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the Federal Republic of Germany. In sum, it can be said that the combined evaluation, as used in this trial inspection, of secondary characteristics and on-site checks provides, in the case of the selected site, sufficient evidence to prove that chemical weapons were non­ existent . The following observations can be added: The numerical strength of the team with 10 inspectors proved adequate. If required, the team could have been subdivided into smaller groups at times, but 
analysis: The text appears to be a report of an inspection of a site, likely a military depot, to verify the presence or absence of chemical weapons. The inspectors conducted a visual examination of the site, checked the ammunition cases, and interviewed personnel. The report concludes that the suspicion of chemical ammunition storage was disproved. Given the context and content of the report, it seems to be related to military or defense activities, which are not directly related to any of the typical categories listed.