text: 45. I should also like to record our deep appreciation to the Minister for Foreign Affairs and representative of Thailand for the admirable manner in which they guided the work of the Council last month. 46. The Security Council, after a period of nearly two years, is meeting again to resume consideration of the situation in Namibia, on the joint initiative of the members of the Movement of Non-Aligned Countries and of the Group of African States. The presence here today of a large number of Foreign Ministers from Non-Aligned Countries is a reflection of the paramount importance that the Movement attaches to the question of Namibia. I should like to recall here that the recently concluded Extraordinary Ministerial Meeting of the Co-ordinating Bureau of Non-Aligned Countries comprehensively reviewed the situation in, and relating to, Namibia, and called upon the Council to act in a decisive manner in fulfilment of the direct responsibility of the United Nations with regard to Namibia and to take urgent meas- ures to ensure that the United Nations plan for Namibia is immediately and unconditionally implemented. 47. The United Nations Council for Namibia-the legal Administering Authority of the Territory-of which Bangladesh is an active member, organized an Extraordinary Plenary Meeting at Vienna from 3 to 7 June. The Declaration and Programme of Action adopted at that meeting [see S/17262, annex] also laid the groundwork for the successful resolution of the Na- mibian question. The outcome of the New Delhi and Vienna meetings, therefore, should guide our current deliberations. 48. The current Council debate on Namibia is taking place at a historic moment. The international commu- nity, in a matter of months, is to observe the fortieth anniversary of the founding of the United Nations. This year also marks the twenty-fifth anniversary of the adop- tion of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing a political issue related to a specific country (Namibia) and its relationship with the United Nations. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting a high-level discussion. The topic is not related to a specific sector or industry, but rather to international relations and politics.