text: the Secretary-General, having considered the recommendations of the APB, had agreed to include in the Register. In accordance with the package of economy measures designed to redress the financial crisis set forth in ST/SGB/217, promotions from all Registers were implemented retroactive to 1 October 1986 and not 1 April 1986. According to a statement by the Representative of the Respondent before the Joint Appeals Board (JAB), when the 1986 APB was considering promotions to the P-5 level, it noted that "Mrs. Kleckner had been recommended for promotion in 1986 by her Department (DCS)" and "was well aware of the fact that she was performing P-5 level functions". Accordingly, "on this basis [the APB] recommended the inclusion of [Mrs. Kleckner's] name in the Register". However, since the Board completed its promotion review after the date of Mrs. Kleckner's separation from service, "her name and the names of five other staff members, no longer in service but initially included [in the Register], were deleted from the 1986 Promotion Register when the latter were issued [by the Assistant Secretary-General, OHRM, later in 1987]". The Applicant's name was not included in the Senior Officer (P-5) Promotion Register and on 3 July 1987, she instituted a recourse procedure, requesting the Secretary-General to include her name therein. She argued essentially, that her name would have been- 6 - included in the Register, had she not been considered to be among the category of staff who had been separated from service at the time promotions were implemented, in accordance with the advice given to the APB by the Assistant Secretary-General, OHRM. The Applicant was unsuccessful in her recourse. On 23 April 1988, the Applicant requested the Secretary-General to review the administrative decision not to include her name in the 1986 Senior Officer (P-5) Promotion
analysis: The text appears to be related to internal organizational matters, specifically regarding promotions and personnel management within an international organization. The language used is formal and technical, suggesting a context of bureaucratic procedures and administrative decisions. The focus is on individual staff members and their career advancement, rather than on broader societal or economic issues.