text: dated 7 February 1983 sent from Mr. Arnulfo Pineda Lopez. Acting Minister for Foreign Affairs of Hon­ duras. to Mr. Guillermo Suarez Rivas. Ambassador of Nicaragua in Honduras. which reads: ·· 1 have the honour to inform you and the illustri­ ous Government of Nicaragua of the following facts: on Thursday 3 February 1983. at 11 a.m .• members of the Sandinist Army penetrated· Honduran terri­ tory to a distance of::!.50 metres from the frontier line between the two countries. in the district of the village of Cifuentes. El Parafso department. to the estate of Mr. Pedro F,~jardo. with the obvious inten­ tion of abducting one or his workers. Mr. Jose Artica Moraz{m: they were unsuccessful. because he es­ caped. A patrol of the armed forces or Honduras [Original: Spanish] [II February /983] immediately arrived on the scene and its presence prompted the members of the Sandini:.t Army (about 20 in number) to withdraw. In view of this new act involving the violation of the territorial sovereignty and integrity of Honduras and the harassment of its nationals. I wish to present. through you. yet an­ other firm and vigorous protest from the Govern­ ment of Honduras. in the hope that the authorities of your country will take appropriate steps to avoid a repetition of such acts of provocation and aggres­ sion:· I should be grateful if you would arrange for this letter to be circulated as a document of the Security Council. (Sig11t'cl) Enrique OR 11:z Col.IN l>RES Pt•mu111C't{t Rt·11rc•sc•111,11in• ,f //011c/11ras 10 1/ic• U11i1c•cl Nations DOCUMENT S/15606 Letter dated 9 February 1983 from the representative of Honduras to the President of the Security Council On instructions from Mr. Edgardo Paz Barnica, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Honduras, I have the honour to transmit to you a copy of the note of protest 
analysis: The text appears to be a diplomatic communication between the Governments of Honduras and Nicaragua, discussing a specific incident involving the Sandinist Army crossing the border into Honduras. The tone is formal and the language is diplomatic, indicating a focus on international relations and territorial sovereignty. The content does not suggest any economic, social, or environmental issues, and the language used is not technical or scientific. Therefore, it is likely that the category is related to international relations or security.