text: minimum. In his view, the exception was not necessary, because ca8es of domestic law violutions were normally settled by insurance or through diplomatic cber~nolsI ltJt3. Some other membora, while not entirely opposed to the inclusion of a provleiun on thibl matter, expressed concern that the text of the article adopted on first reading might be projudicial to the question of State roepon3ibi 1 ity, Difficulties arose, according to ono member, from the fact. thrt. in the fir,ut place ths articlu provided for t,ho post;ibilit.y t.hnt. a court might: :\tt.r.ibut..o to a foreign State an act or omir;si,on of a pbyr;ioill or logo3 pot*;on, distinct from that State, who was present. in the territory of the fat urn !it nt.tt t4t. 1.11~ t.ime of ~iucti wn act: or omission, and declare t.t1irt. st..at.e t.0be responsible. In his view, the regulation of legal relations in connection with compensation for damage wae outside the scope of the present article. Secmdly, it was said, an unlawful act or omission of a State was to be determined through international procedbrea in accordance with the rules of international law, and could not be determined by national courts. Another member was similarly concatined that the article at first sight might imply that there wae a question of internetfonel reeponsibility of a State, whereas in fact the scope of application of the article was limited to the determination of responsibility by reference not so much to the rules of international law aa to the rules of munic.dpal law applied by the ccurt of the forum State, pursuant to Peg *In this connection, one member indicated that he could accept the article only on condition that a new paragraph 2 was added, reading “Paragraph 1 does not affect rules concerning State responsibility under international law”. 189. Concern wea also expressed that, under the terms of the article, the
analysis: The text appears to be discussing a legal framework for resolving disputes between states, specifically regarding the responsibility of a state for an unlawful act or omission. The language used is technical and legal, indicating that the topic is related to international law and state responsibility.