text: tories. The position of the occrrpying authority and its obligations in regard to the territories under military occupation and to their inhabitants are clearly defined in the basic norms of jnternational law and the Geneva Conventions of 1949. Third parties and all those persons who have taken or might consider taking measures or actions or engaging in enterprises regarding the Arab territories 110w occupied by Israel that could constitute rocognjtion on their part of that occupation or that might help sustain it should know that Egypt and, I am sure, the other Arab States do not and will not recognize the validity of their actions. International law does not recognize such validity. 59. The millionaires who *are gathering in Israel for a fund of’ funds, with a one-million dollar share, should perhaps hear that. Furthermore, the United Nations membership ~h0~11d--as, indeed, decided by the General Assembly- refrain from giving Israel aid that might help it in its continued occupation of Arab territories. On the contrary, and in an effort of collective security reflected by the presence of the eight Foreign Ministers here, help should be given to the victims of the military occupation in order to rid themselves of this yoke. 60. Security Ccuncjl resolution 242 (1967) adopted in Nover-&er 1967, called for the withdrawal of Israeli military forces from the lands they had occupied jn what the Council then referred to as “the recent conflict”, The G0uncjl stressed the right of all nations of the area to ]jve jn peace within secure and recognized boundaries. The sug- gestion that omission of the word “the” before the word “territories” in paragraph 1 (i) of that resolution means that acquisition of the entire territory of a Member State is 110~ permissible but the acquisition Of Smdl amOunts Of its territory is permissible does not really Warrant mY cO1n- 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing international relations and politics, specifically the Israeli occupation of Arab territories and the obligations of third parties and international organizations. It mentions international law, the Geneva Conventions, and a United Nations Security Council resolution. The text also references economic aspects, such as a fund of funds, but the primary focus is on the political and legal implications of the occupation.