text: Angolan territory. South Africa, which is illegally clinging to Namibia, has no right whatsoever, under any pretext, to violate the territory of Angola. 17. The Council last considered a similar complaint by Angola against South Africa barely three months ago. South Africa had the audacity then to dispatch its military forces to the Angolan Province of Cabinda and to sow 23. This is the same South Africa which, in order to perpetuate its illegal occupation, introduced the so-called linkage between the independence of Namibia and the withdrawal of Cuban troops from Angola. Because of that 2 death and destruction. Needless to say, Cabinda is nowhere near South Africa or the Territory of Namibia, which the Pretoria regime continues to occupy illegally. IS. Now South Africa has committed aggression against Angola in the Province of Cuando-Cubango, more than 200 kilometres from the border with Namibia. Innocent Angolan lives have been lost. Other Angolan nationals have been maimed, and valuable property has been destroyed. 19. The South African act of aggression against Angola in the Province of Cabinda surprised and even angered South Africa’s friends in the Western world, coming as it did not long after the purported completion of the with- drawal of its troops from that country in keeping with the Lusaka agreement and, indeed, as vital American Gulf Oil installations were earmarked for sabotage and destruction. The Council, as did world opinion in general, strongly condemned South Africa and demanded an end to all such acts of aggression, as well as strict respect by South Africa for the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of Angola. But, as it has consistently done since Angola’s independence, South Africa ignored the demand of the Council. It treated resolution 567 (1985) with contempt, as its present aggression against Angola clearly demonstrates. 
analysis: The text appears to be a diplomatic document or a statement from an international organization, condemning the actions of South Africa towards Angola. It discusses the territorial integrity of Angola, the occupation of Namibia, and the deployment of military forces. The tone is formal and critical, indicating a focus on international relations and diplomacy.