text: thèse provisions are listed in Part II of this working paper. Other draft E/CN.4/Sub.2/1990/39 page 2 provisions are set out in Part III, with an analysis of the comments thus far made on each of them and preliminary suggestions for the direction of further considération. 6. The Chairman/Rapporteur wishes to express her appréciation to ail those who have made constructive written and oral contributions to the further analysis and refinement of the text of the draft déclaration. She also expresses the sincère hope that the ongoing dialogue between ail the parties concemed will continue with full vigour until the draft déclaration can be adopted in its final form. E/CN.4/Sub.2/1990/39 page 3 II. DRAFT PROVISIONS ON WHICH THERE IS BROAD AGREEMENT 7. The Chairman/Rapporteur, Ms. Daes, is pleased to note that a number of draft preambular paragraphs and articles have thus far attracted favourable observations or in any case no critical comments or suggestions, and therefore may indeed be widely acceptable. The Working Group at its eighth session may wish to consider adopting thèse provisions in first reading, so as to be able to focus its attention on those provisions of the draft déclaration on which differing views have been expressed. 8. The provisions of the draft déclaration, as it appears in the first revised text and which might be adopted at first reading, are the following: (a) in the preamble, ail except the first, fifth and twelfth paragraphs; (b) in Part II, the third, fourth, and seventh articles; (c) in Part III, the thirteenth article; (d) in Part IV, the nineteenth and twentieth articles; (e) in Part V, the twenty-second and twenty-sixth articles; (f) in Part VII, the twenty-ninth and thirtieth articles. 9. The provisional adoption of the foregoing draft articles and paragraphs, in first reading, would leave remaining for discussion and further élaboration 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the development of a draft declaration, which suggests that it may be related to human rights or international law. The language used is formal and diplomatic, indicating that it may be a document from a United Nations or similar organization. The specific provisions mentioned relate to general principles and human rights, which further supports this hypothesis.