text: order to give direct military support to the terrorist gangs of UNITA mercenaries, organized and supplied by Preto- ria. As a result of the bandit-like attack by South Africa, Angola has suffered casualties; people, including civilians, have been killed and wounded, and senseless destruction has been caused. 80. These criminal actions by the South African racists are a gross violation of the Charter and international law. This is a new escalation of the racist aggression against Angola. This act of aggression has increased the threat to peace and security not only in southern Africa but far beyond its borders. For many sovereign African States, it has increased the danger of war that constantly emanates from that hotbed of racism in South Africa. 81. By continuing this undeclared war against Angola, the Pretoria regime has defied the United Nations and the entire world community, which has demanded that an end be put once and for all to South Africa’s aggression against neighbouring sovereign States. 82. The statement by the representative of South Africa in the Council this morning has shown that the racist Pm-. toria regime is not demonstrating any readiness to heed the loud and clear voices of protest and corrdemnation in the Council. The Government of South Africa has turned a deaf ear to the demands of the majority of the States of the world and continues to issue threats against neighbouring countries; it presumes to act as an international policeman in Africa and is using Namibia, which it illegally occupies, as a springboard for the expansion of its aggression against its neighbours. 83. As before, the South African’racists have been trying to cover up their crimes against the African peoples by using hackneyed inventions about the Soviet-Cuban danger. 84. The aggressor has been acting cynically and treacher- 
analysis: The text appears to be a formal statement or declaration from a government or international organization, criticizing the actions of another country, South Africa, for its alleged support of terrorist gangs and military aggression against Angola. The language used is formal and diplomatic, with references to international law, the United Nations, and the Charter. The content is focused on the political and security aspects of the situation, with no mention of economic, social, or cultural issues.