text: annualprogress reports ontheimplementation oftheplansfortheelimination ofchemical weapons andanotification ofthecompletion oftheelimination within30daysthereafter. "8.AnnexIIIandAnnexIVconstit"..lteintegral. partsoftheConvention. " "Declarations ofchemicals whichcouldbeusedforchemical weapons purposes butwhichareintended forpermitted purposes 2/ "Declarations ofchemical weapons production facilities (Tobeelaborated) "Verification ofdeclarations (Tobeelaborated) "11Somedelegations heldtheviewthatoverall declarations should bemadewithin30daysaftertheConvention's entryintoforcefora StateParty. "2/Inaccordance withtheorganization ofwork(WP.98)these provisions aretobeelaborated inthecontextofArticle VItakinginto accountinteraliasomeharmful chemicals, tobeelaborated. -88-" or be " "1 "1 co inthe "ANNEXIII ~ter 'iod. ,tive ,th"I. "A. "1.DECLARATIONS OFCHEMICAL WEAPONS Possession ornon-possession Possession ofchemical weapons onownterritory. Yes No ,ion"2.Possession, jurisdiction orcontrol overchemical weapons elsewhere. Yes No Ifyes,information aboutlocation(s), expressed byname(s)ofState(s). "B.Existence ontheterritory ofanychemical weapons underthejurisdictionorcontrolofanyone~ Yes No Ifyes,information aboutownership, expressed byname(s)ofState(s). "C.Pasttransfers 1/ "Iftherehasbeentransfer ofcontrolofchemical weapons since•••••,orreception ofsuchweapons sincethatdate,thefollowing information shallbeprovided. Tobeelaborated. "D.Aggregatequantityanddetailed composition ofchemical weapons "1.Chemicals "1.1Toxicchemicals 2/ "Incasesinvolving mixtures oftwoormoretoxicchemicals allsuchcomponents shouldbespecified aswellasthepercentage ofthemixtures. "1/Theviewwasexpressed thatpasttransfers shouldnotbeincludedinthe-Convention. "2/Inaccordance withagreeddefinition. -89-.~I"1.1.1 Super-toxiC lethalChemicals.!:.! Scientific chemical name~1Bulk FilledinTotal Structural formula}1 andmunitionquantity !Purity!1Quantity NumberandQuantity Toxicity (ofpuresubstance) (metric sizeof(metric(metk'ic '"tons) containers tons)tons) Chemical A Chemical B etc. "1.1.2 otherlethalchemicals.!:.! Scientific chemical name~~Bulk FilledinTotalmunition Structural formula21andPurityilQuantity NumberandQuantityquantity (metricToxicity (ofpuresubstance) ~(metric sizeof(metrictons)tons) containers tons) "1.1.3 Otherharmful chemicals21 Scientific chemical nam~11Bulk FilledinTotal Structural formula21andmunitionquantity Purity!1Quantity NumberandQuantity Toxicity~f puresubstance) (metric sizeof(metric(metric ifapplicable%tons) containers tons)tons) "11Inaccordance withagreeddefinition. "21Inaccordance withtheIUPAC(International UnionofPureandApplied Chemistry) Nomenclature. "31Different viewsexistwhetheritisnecessary tostateboththe scientific chemical nameandthe·structural formula inord~rforthedeclarations tobeunambiguous. "ilThreedifferent approaches weretakenbydelegations: 1)Initial purity, 2)Purityofthecompound asstoredwithanapproximation ofsome10percent. 3)Thatdeclaration ofpuritywasnotnecessary. "5/Inaccordance withagreeddefinition, butpending suchadefinition it isunclear whichchemicals todeclare inthistable. -90-a1 Iltity tk'ic s) a1 ntity tric s) a1 ntity tric s)Scientific2!Numberandsize chemical name-! Quantity Structural formula}!(metric.tons) ofcontainers Keyprecursors forunitary systems ~J Scientific chemical nam~!!Bulk FilledinTotal formula}!munitionlquantityStructural Quantity Numberand submunition(metric(metric sizeof (metrictons)tons) containers tons) [Keycomponents] [Key precursors] formulti- component ·systems !!2!~! plied ~ations puritY, mt. lonit-"11Theviewwasexpressed thatthesetwotableswerenotnecessary and thekeyprecursors andkeycomponents couldbedeclared underpoints1.1.1, 1.1.2and1.1.'asapplicable. "21Inaccordance withtheIUPAC(International UnionofPureandApplied Chemiitry) Nomenclature •. "11Different viewsexistwhetheritisnecessary tostateboththe scientific chemical nameandthestructural formula inorderforthedeclarations tobeunambiguous. "41Tobedeclared separately forsuper-toxic lethal, otherlethalandother harmful chemicals. "21Identified inaccordance withapproaches tobeworkedoutinthe contextofArticle 11.
analysis: The text appears to be related to the implementation of a treaty aimed at eliminating chemical weapons. It discusses the declaration of chemical weapons, their possession, and the composition of the weapons. The text also touches on the verification of declarations and the need for clarity and unambiguity in the declarations. This suggests that the text is related to a specific international agreement and the efforts to implement it.