text: was a paliative measure which nevertheless entailed subsequent thorou1~h examination of the problem of the rules of procedure that applied to the Sub-Conunission. 62. At the request of Mr. Alfonso Martinez. a vote was taken by roll--call on draft resolution E/CN.4/Sub.2/1990/L.4. as amended. 6 3. Mr. Eide. having been drawn by lot by the Chairman. was called UJ>on to vote first. In favour: Mrs. Bautista, Mr. van Boven, Mr. Chernichenko, Mrs .. Daes, Mr. Despouy,.Mr. Eide, Mr. Guisse, Mr. Hatano, Mr. Heller, Mr. Ilkahanaf, Mr. Joinet, Mr. Khalifa, Mrs. Ksentini, Mr. Maxim, Mrs. Mbonu, Mr. Merills, Mr. Suesc6n Monroy, Mr. Saboia, Mr. Treat, Mrs. Warzazi Aiainst: Mr. Alfonso Martinez, Mr. Tian Jin Abstaining: Mr. Sachar, Mr. Yimer. 64. Draft resolution E/CN.4/Sub.2/1990/L.4. as amended. was adopted by 20 votes to 2. with 2 abstentions. Draft resolution E/CN.4/Sub.2/1990/L.Z 65. The CHAIRMAN invited the Sub-Conunission to consider the draft resolution contained in document E/CN.4/Sub.2/1990/L.Z and the amendments thereto contained in documents E/CN.4/Sub.2/1990/L.l2 and L.l5. 66. Mr. ALFQNSO MARTINEZ, introducing draft resolution E/CN.4/Sub.2/1990/L.7, said that it was self-explanatory. It proposed a solution to the problem of the Sub-Conunission's rules of procedure which took into account all the ideas that had been expressed during the debate. The proposal in operative paragraph 1 that a number of members of the Sub-Conunission should prepare a draft of a new set of rules of procedure would not have any financial implications; and the proposal in operative paragraph 2 would not conflict with the footnote adopted as part of draft resolution E/CN.4/Sub.2/1990/L.4. E/CN.4/Sub.2/1990/SR.24 page 9 67. Mrs. WARZAZI, supported by Mrs. MBQNU, disagreed with Mr. Alfonso Martinez. The decision, in operative paragraph 2, not to suspend rules 59 and 60 of the present rules of procedure would conflict with the provisions of resolution E/CN.4/Sub.2/1990/L.4 just adopted. 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the proceedings of a meeting or conference, specifically the adoption of a draft resolution related to the rules of procedure of a sub-committee. The language used is formal and technical, suggesting that the topic is related to governance or administrative procedures. The mention of specific rules of procedure and the voting process also suggests that the text is related to a formal decision-making process.