text: It 1s obvious that the Advisory Committee recommended' and the Assembly agreed, to make judgemente rtfinal and i{ithout appeal!' in order not to delay final decisions. But this did not exclude the posslbtltty of lhe As6ernbly revlewlng those judSements, if necessary, e6peclaLly when they lrere based on decisioos taken r,rith excess of polaers. Taking into conslderation the creatlotr of a Special Indernnity Fund, j.t may be concluded that no Intention to leave Member Statee to the mercy o -16- IV. STAFF ACTIVITIES 5?: The canpaign of "taking the Unlred Nations Ceneral Aeselrlbly to Court ,whlch partly reEulted from the ICSC decislon on the 9.6 increase of postadjustnent for Ne!,r york, ls an unprecedented one among those organtzed bystaff bodies to put pre6eure on the delegat.es in the General eeaernbly, tnorde! to achleve their goals. It id bej.ng waged, ae in eimllar """"", o.,a flnancial basls, but thls tlme Lt has ecqulr;d pollttcel dlnenelon: thelntention to tEke the General Aseembly to the Court, or rtteach lt E lessonrl6e well Ea to put the General Assembly and Secretarlat in coofrontation.threats to dlsrupt the United Nations corulon ey€tem. In ord€r to lniluencedelegates, staff bodies plocletn the light to 6t;lke, and allege to be thenagtera of the OlSanlzetlon. 'rAgain, lt is the staff ,.rho are the UnltedNatlons't lll , decl ated the pre€ident of FICSA. :1._ -ta la not aurprlelng that staff bodles are vtgoroualy oupported byAdmlnlatlation. There is, in fact, no dlvldlng ltie betwien iiem, wnfchrneEna thet the Adtnlnlgtretion, cohposed of the oame staff rnenbers, le equallylnterested in lnereaBe€ ln sslariea and other beneflts. In other words,th€ Untted Natlona Secretaliat nu6t be seen ae a unique group of lnternationalclvll servants wlth more comnonal lty of lnterests uoitt.rg ttir, th6n rrlth anydlvergence of lnterests divtdlng them.
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the activities and interests of staff bodies within the United Nations, specifically their relationship with the General Assembly and the Secretariat. The text highlights the staff bodies' intention to influence delegates and achieve their goals, which may involve taking legal action or exerting pressure on the Assembly. The text also touches on the issue of the Secretariat's role and interests, suggesting that the staff members who make up the Secretariat have common interests with the staff bodies.