text: the Committee was the need to adopt financial restraint. 26. Mrs. GREGORY (Canada), supported by Mr. DIECKMANN (Federal Republic of Germany), said that her delegation associated itself with Sweden, particularly with regard to limiting, wherever possi­ ble, the financial burdens on the system. Although her delegation had joined in the consensus on the decision, she wished to reiterate Canada's concern that more information should have been made available and to express the hope that the decision would not affect the integrity and quality of the International Narcotics Control Board. 27. Miss FRANKINET (Belgium) said that her delegation had joined in the consensus; however, it shared Canada's view that the decision had been based on incomplete information. She expressed the hope that, at the organizational session for 1987, brief and clear information on the usefulness of the Committee and its possible contribution would be made available. 28. Mr. FAREED (Pakistan) noted that the ques­ tion of the establishment of a Committee on Candi­ datures would not be considered in 1987, but rather in 1988. He supported Algeria's view that the Committee's most significant contribution had been to provide linkage between the Board and the Council. He felt that budgetary restraint should have been a less important consideration in the debate. He expressed the hope that the Secretariat would present a full position paper in 1988 in order to make possible a lively discussion. DRAFT DECISIONS PROPOSED BY THE PRESIDENT IN DOCUMENT E/1986/L.9, ON BEHALF OF THE BUREAU OF THE COUNCIL, ON THE BASIS OF INFORMAL CONSULTATIONS 29. The PRESIDENT invited the Council to take action on draft decisions 1 to 11 that he proposed on 4th meeting-7 February 1986 9 behalf of the Bureau, on the basis of informal consultations, in document E/1986/L.9, namely: 1, 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing a committee's financial decisions and the need for restraint, with delegates expressing concerns about the availability of information and the potential impact on the integrity of an International Narcotics Control Board. The discussion is focused on the organizational and administrative aspects of the committee's work, rather than specific policy areas.