text: Socialist Republics ) 9.t t" accordance with paragraph 8 of General Assenblyresolution 38/L36, to the extent that these incidents involved the Federal Republicof Germany: The Federal Republic of Germany, as signatory, has consistently advocatedstrict adherence to the provisions of the Vienna Convention on DiplomaticRelations. Therefore, it firmly rejects the charges levelled against it bythe Soviet Union. As a result of an inquiry into the incidents rnentioned'by the SovietUnion it has been established that several demongtrations took place in frontof the Soviet Enbassy in Bonn in June and July of 1984. The participants, nhose nunbers varied between 2 and 23, comported thenselves peacefully andnever interfered with the operations of the ltission. In another case, a German televislon team filmed nembers of the Sovlet Embassy in Bonn and tbe building they live in. $lhen requested by the policeto refrain from further filming of the private sphere of the members of the Enbassy and, because of the right to prlvacy of thoae concerned, to hand overthe filns already made, the camera team complied. During the custons check of a Soviet truck at the border crossing pointof llelmstedt on 19 July 1984, the cargo, declared as a diplomatic bag accompanied by courier, turned out not to conform to the relevant provislonsof the Vienna Convention. The diptonatic courier accompanying the truckproduced an official docunent nhich, while establishing his official status,did not indicate the nunber of packagea conatituting the diplomatic bag. Thatr|as clearly in contravention of article z7, patagraph 5, of the viennaConvention. This Convention does not provide a legal basis to the claim thata truck with a total load of 91000 kilograns could be held to constitute onesingle diplomatic bag. Hence, the Sovi.et Embassy rras requested to open thetruck and to submit a list indicating the number of packages. The Enbassy
analysis: The text appears to be a diplomatic statement or communiqué, addressing a specific incident involving the Federal Republic of Germany and the Soviet Union. It discusses the adherence to the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and the handling of diplomatic bags. Given the context, it seems unlikely that the text is related to economic development, natural resources, agriculture, forestry, fishing, health, education, employment, humanitarian aid, or culture. The focus on diplomatic relations and international law points towards a category related to international relations.