text: extended to the members of the Sub-Commission to visit Iraq to have first-hand knowledge of the facts regarding the situation of human rights and fundamental freedoms and the statement made by the Permanent Representative of Iraq to the Commission on 23 February 1990 which reaffirmed the readiness of the Government of Iraq to extend all the assistance necessary to ensure the success of the visit and by which the Government of Iraq thus endorsed the invitation, decided to accept and welcome the invitation extended to the members of the Sub-Commission, invited the chairman of the Sub-Commission to consult the members of the Sub-Commission on the visit, requested the members to report on the visit to the Sub-Commission at its next session, requested the Secretary-General -276-to provide the necessary facilities, within existing resources, for the carrying out of the visit in accordance with United Nations practice and requested the Sub-Commission to report to the Commission at its forty-seventh session on the results of the visit." 614. The attention of the Commission was drawn to the administrative and programme budget implications 1/ of draft decision E/CN.4/1990/L.85/Rev.l in an oral statement delivered by the Deputy Director of the Centre for Human Rights. 615. Statements related to the revised draft decision were made by the representatives of Morocco and Senegal and the Observer for Egypt. 616. The representative of Iraq moved a motion, in accordance with rule 65, paragraph 2, of the rules of procedure of the functional commissions of the Economic and Social Council to take no decision on the draft decision. 617. The representatives of Bangladesh, China, Morocco, Sweden, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America made statements related to the motion. 618. At the request of the representative of the Federal Republic of Germany,
analysis: The text appears to be discussing a United Nations Sub-Commission's decision to send a team to Iraq to assess the human rights and fundamental freedoms situation. The language used is formal and diplomatic, indicating a focus on international relations and human rights. The text does not mention economic or environmental issues, agriculture, industry, transport, or trade, and is therefore unlikely to fall under these categories.