text: “‘a vital.strategic ally in an important part of the world. The moral and personal bonds that tie us together have strengthened us both”.* What democracy indeed if they are mutually strengthened by oppressing and killing others? 60. The Secretary of State of that super-Power continued to emphasize the organic relationship of his country with usurper Israel and its unlimited commitment to the expan- sionist and aggressive Israeli policies. He went even further and said: “Through our material’and moral support for Israel, our votes in the United Nations, and our efforts for peace . . . we are a permanent, steadfast and unshake- able ally of the State of Israel. “Every year we provide more securitv assistance to Israel than to any other nation. We consider that aid to be one of the best investments we could make-not only for Israel’s security but for ours as well.*‘* 61. As opposed to the absolute support for Israel, we find in the same statement made by Mr. Shultz a remarka- ble contempt of Arab reason and of the dignity of all Arabs when he says: “Both Arabs and Israelis trust us, and they seek our help.” I wonder, is there an Arab who had asked for their help to consolidate the occupation of our territories and the humiliation of our citizens? We answer Mr. Shultz by saying that we cannot place our trust in the United States, which, as is well known, has made available all its unlimited resources for the consolidation of Israeli occupation and the annexation of Arab territories, begin- ning’ with Jerusalem and the Golan Heights, thus encou- raging Israel to pursue its acts of aggression and invasion against our nation. 62. In answer to Mr. Shultz’s comment about the expan- sionist, racist nature of Israel-the Israel which the Ameri- 
analysis: The text appears to be a political statement or a speech by a government official, likely criticizing the United States' support for Israel's occupation and expansion. The language used is strongly emotive and accusatory, with a focus on the moral and ethical implications of the US's actions. This suggests that the category should be related to international relations or politics.