text: lines of 14 October 1948. Israel refused to abide by it. 41. On 22 December 1948 Israel again attacked in the Negev to gain even more land, and again, according to Mr. Bunche’s report [S/1152 of 2.5 December 19481, without justification, even after 1948, Israel continued its expansionist policy. Despite the United Nations opposition, it seized control of most of the Syrian-Israeli demilitarized zone, and in 195.5 all of the El-Auja demilitarized zone. This horrendous record of expansionism, which climaxed in 1967, has exposed the true nature of Israel. 42. General Dayan declared to some American Jewish College students on the Golan Heights in 1968: “During the last one hundred years our people have been in the process of building up the country and the nation, of expansion, of giving additional Jews additional settlements in order to expand the borders here: let no Jew say that the process has ended, let no Jew say that we are near the end of the road.” That was reported in Maariv of 7 July 1968. 43. The question that arises here is’ this: Why does Israel have expansionist designs? The answer is to be found in one of the central concepts of Zionism legislated into the State’s character. It is the concept of “Aliyah”. “Aliyah” is the idea that all Jews should emigrate to Israel. On 24 November 1952, the Knesset enacted a piece of legislation known as the World Zionist Organization Jewish Agency for Palestine Status Law. That law emphasizes that recruitment for Jewish immigration is the “central task of the State of Israel”. This recruitment, again to use the words of the law, “requires constant efforts by the World Zionist Organization to assist immigration of masses of Jews from around the world into Israel”. If that call for immigration within the context of the “Aliyah” concept 
analysis: The text primarily discusses the history of Israel's territorial expansion, its relations with the United Nations, and the concept of "Aliyah" as a central concept of Zionism. The language used is more political and ideological than economic or technical, suggesting that the focus is on the country's international relations and national identity rather than specific sectors or industries.