text: out the seriousness of the problems we are facing and, at the same time, to underscore the extreme gravity of the crisis. We, the spokesmen of our coun- tries, are not insensitive. We cannot be indifferent to the massacre that is going on in the South Atlantic, on an Argentine insular territory. We must stop that massacre. . , We must say to the United Kingdom, “You must stop the hostilities. You cannot continue attacking the Argentine nation. You must bring about a cease-fire. YOLI must pull back your forces”, and when that occurs, give a mandate to the Secrctary- General, not before then, because that would simply be a farce. 228. If one examines the thinking of the United Kingdom as expressed in the words of the Prime Min- ister, one realizes that there are obsessive feelings there. “If you want peace, you must leave. If you do :/: Quoted in English by the speaker. not leave, there will be war.” And that is directed not ..just against Argentina, but also against the United Natmns, which in 1965 said to the United Kingdom: you must sit down and negotiate the decolonization of the islands. That showed that the British claim to them was not valid. 229. Decolonization was called for, but that does not mean that the formula presented by the United Kingdom has to be accepted, a formula that is part of an ultimatum: Argentina goes back to its territory 400 miles from the Malvinas; the British fleet goes 1.50 miles away. This-150 miles-is absurd, because when the Argentines leave, then the fleet could return again and the Argentine troops obviously could not cover the 400 miles in time to resist them. Reference has been made here to good and bad faith, but we 
analysis: The text appears to be a speech or statement from a government representative or diplomat, discussing a crisis situation involving Argentina and the United Kingdom, specifically the Falkland Islands/Malvinas dispute. The language used is formal and diplomatic, with a focus on the political and military aspects of the conflict.