text: budget by transfer from extrabudgetary funds would be 15 Professional posts. 82. The procedure used was rather involved, and left the Fifth Committee and General Assembly unaware of exactly how many posts were being requested for transfer to the regular budget. The Administration should have decided on the status of the 14 posts recommended for phasing out by JV.IS before making its proposal to transfer 28 posts to the regular budget. Accordingly, the Advisory Committee had recommended that the 14 posts which the Administration had established on a temporary basis until July 1984 should be fully restored to the regular budget, and that 15 Professional posts should be transferred to the regular budget. The Advisory Committee had also recommended that the 7 General Service posts identified by AMS should remain in the regular budget for the time being. There was thus no need to transfer the 6 General Service posts proposed by the Secretary-General. Nevertheless, the Advisory Committee did support the transfer to extrabudgetary sources of the 22 local-level posts. 83. The Advisory Committee's recommendations, in paragraphs 21.7 to 21.10, were logical and understandable. The details of the Professional posts which the Advisory Committee did not wish to see transferred for the time being were contained in paragraph 21.9. 84. The Advisory Committee had noted that the inflation rate for UNHCR's field activities and information centres was too high, and had recommended a reduction in the rate from 15 per cent to 10 per cent. 85. It should be noted that if the Fifth Committee approved the recommendation in paragraph 324 of the report of CPC (A/38/38 (part II to phase out)) 7 Professional and 7 General Service posts in the Office of UNHCR, it would be contradicting some of the recommendations contained in the report of the Advisory Committee. That CPC 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the budget and personnel of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), specifically the transfer of posts from extrabudgetary funds to the regular budget. The language used is technical and bureaucratic, suggesting that the text is related to administrative or organizational matters rather than a specific field of activity. The mention of Professional posts and General Service posts also suggests a connection to employment or human resources.