text: Bky 4 take if: thst t5a Aosa&%y adopt6 this rocwadatiou? -Ai& -a In paragrtph 20, ia conaectioa with item 36 of tha &tit og[oada bYudgm@nt of the Intetoational Court o& Justko of 27 Jarsvp 1966 uonowaiag tilitary and pnraailitsry activities in aa4 qalnrt Mcaraguat xawd for i.%wdiate coapliauea), th8 Oeneral Csaaittae ~ecoawand6 to tha Ga3eraS Asuambly that eoaeidooatlon of Uia lOoa ohould b4b Blefort6d. May I teh it that tbm Aarasl4ly approve6 this roe0wmndatisa? -* S: In paragraph 29# coacaradq Ptau 79 of the drrft ag@ndsr (fhwatfon of the Hnlsguy io%mads of GPoriau8a0, &AM de UOvar turop~ at@ 8880~ d8 Iadiab, ttu Gwetal Cmittea ruconmwad8 that conoidmration of the iLean &mltY ba deforrad to t&b forty-rixth oecsio~ ud that th@ &tar mh0uld be iacl%dad in tbm provioioa8l agmnd& of that l oa8ion. May I take Bt that the A6arshly apptover thh recmaad8tioa7 It* -8 Brr paragahpb 30, aoaaae~nkag itam 116 of th8 draft agund8 (Qwoti9a of But Ttiwjo ttw <fost~xrf Cmiteae racoa;scsnd8 that ao~idoration of thircr it- 8p1Qulb be braforrul to tb for&y-8irtb remsioa a~& Oat t&e %a rbould be PnalUlloB irr tb prcvisiomal aqcada of th8t roaaiu.bn. May I take it that the kmearbly approve8 th0ara r~eomeadatioar? -. mw4 A/45/PV.3 9-10 -8 In paregragh 31 in conaaction with item 141 of thm draft ogaahla ('mvelopmst 8xul rt*eng*hmning of good-neighbourliners betwwn St&am), tlka gwota.1 Comittee resommadm, &8t cos8mfdwlbtCio0 of tha item 8houlQ be deferred to tha forty-mint.% 8ession and that the item should be iaoludod in the provirional agenda of that rrPl8iori. wl,y I t&a it t2ut th0 Amsembly approver thio recosaendation? -* -0 In eoz 3ctiOn with ptntugraph 32. may I draw th8 Uescurel h~neiahly*s ettontion to the fact that the wor'dizq of the propooed itba *IraQi ~reesio~ ett81 continued ocoupation of Xuwsit ?.n flagrant violation 00 Security 
analysis: The text appears to be a diplomatic document, discussing the approval of resolutions and recommendations by the General Assembly. The topics mentioned, such as "occupation of Kuwait", "human rights", and "good-neighbourliness", suggest that the document may be related to international relations, security, and human rights. However, there is no explicit mention of economic development, natural resources, or specific industries.