text: 1 7. Mr. MAKSIMOV (Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic) said that it was taken from the operative paragraph of the Proclamation of the International Year of Peace, annexed to General Assembly resolu­ tion 40/3. 18. Mr. STIRLING (United States of America) said that while he appreciated the efforts of the delegation of the Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic to come 19. Mr. MAKSIMOV (Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic) said that he did not understand the position of the United States delegation. He would welcome clarification as to what exactly that delega­ tion wished. 20. Mr. MATELJAK (Yugoslavia) said that he wished to appeal to the delegation of the United States and to the sponsors of the draft resolution to seek a compromise formula. There could be no question of a vote on the subject of peace and it was essential that the draft resolution be adopted unanimously. 21. The PRESIDENT suggested that the Council should resume its consideration of draft resolution E/1986/L.23/Rev .1 at the following meeting. It was so decided. AGENDA ITEM 3 Implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (concluded) DRAFT RESOLUTION E/1986/L.22 22. The CHAIRMAN announced that Bulgaria and Denmark had become sponsors of draft resolution E/1986/L.22. At the request of the representative of the United States of America, a vote was taken on draft resolution El 1986/L.22. Draft resolution E/1986/L.22 was adopted by 47 votes to none, with 1 abstention (resolution 1986/3). 23. Ms. YOUNG (United Kingdom), speaking in explanation of vote, said that she had voted in favour of the draft resolution on the understanding that the concept of the indivisibility of human rights did not mean that certain rights could be neglected for the sake of others or that the enjoyment of one set of rights depended necessarily on the enjoyment of others. 
analysis: The text appears to be a discussion in a United Nations setting, specifically the Economic and Social Council, regarding a draft resolution on the implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. The language used is formal and diplomatic, and the topics being discussed are related to human rights and international law. However, there is no direct mention of economic development, natural resources, or environmental issues, which are common themes in this type of setting.