text: of tbo Group of High-Awl Intorgovernsental Experte to Revimw the Efficimncy of thm Mniairtrative and Financial Pusctioning of thm Uaitmd latiooc. In connmctioa with rrcoarnrmdatioa 3 (c)., in particular, the Umnmral Comnittem rmcomend8 to tho t3mneral Axmeably that, aa at recent sms&ioom, thm holding of concurrmet meting8 of tbm Bpmcial Political and l?ourtb CoaPittmma should be avoided, to the mxtmnt poasiblm ana with thm nmceorery flmxibility, during the fofty-fifth seasion. May I take it that the Axssmbly agrees tu tbat reconnrendation? EMS/3 U45lov.3 3 -1 In mmction If C, which rmlatmm to thm closing date of thm forty-fifth mmmmion, thm Gmmeral Comunittme rmcommnmndm to thm General Amoenbly that, in the light of the practice at recent memmionm, the forty-fifth mmmmion refzemm on 18 Docomber 1999 amd cLome on 16 September 1991. Way f take it that the Ammrmbly approver that recoaraendation? -* s: In that connectionr I wimh to reiterate my appeal to all the Main Ccsmaitteem. without oxcaption, that they mhould mtart their work am moon am pommiblm. Pmgarding the l chmdule of meeting8 referred to in mmction II D, the Gmneral Comittee, in paragraph 7, recolranndm that mamtingm should mtert at 10 a.m. promptly for all plenary mmetingm and mamtiugm of the Xain CoaPaitteem during the forty-fife memmion. May I take it that the A8mmmbly approves.that reconaendation? rt* -1 In paragraph 8 the General Cmittee almo rmcorrarendm tbat, in order to ivoid thm late mtart of meetingjm and am a coot-mavimg taeamure, the Gmaeral Amsmmbly mhould Waive the rOqUireR4aUfL of the premence of at learnt one third of the mmmberm to declare a plenary meeting open and permit the debate to proceed and of at learnt one quarter of nwdbers to declare a nnmtiqf of a Main Committee open and permit the debate to proceed. Tbat reoctuwndation im mmQm on 
analysis: The text appears to be a draft of a resolution or report related to the administrative and financial management of a international organization, specifically the United Nations. It discusses the scheduling of meetings, the quorum required to open and conduct meetings, and the recommendation to avoid holding concurrent meetings. The language used is formal and bureaucratic, suggesting that the document is intended for an official or institutional setting.