text: tionalist has ever crossed the borders of Angola. What the Government and people of Angola do inside our territory is entirely our own business. Angolan territory belongs to the Angolans. Pretoria’s assertions about “an increasing flow of evidence that SWAP0 was intent on staging some major terrorist operation” are so patently false that they need not have bothered with this feeble excuse. What increasing flow of evidence? What major operation? 163. The reputation of the South African armed forces, their military intelligence unit and their state security appa- ratus is so well known that “admissions” obtained by them are of no worth and would never stand up in any court of law except that of the racists and run by the racists. The mysterious “deaths” and “suicides” of people under racist detention are also a matter of international knowledge and public record. And the description of the present massive armed invasion of Angola has been described by the racists as “a follow-up operation”. Follow-up to what? Follow- up to the confession of a tortured Namibian patriot, even if the story of the arrest is true-which it is not? Follow-up to an imagined, unimplemented ghost operation? By whom, where, and when? 164. Even a cursory look at past Council records will reveal that the racists undertake a brutal invasion, and then, as soon as a Council meeting is called on the subject, they announce the “commencement” of the withdrawal of their troops. Sometimes the “withdrawal” takes years to complete, and more often than not it is never completed before yet another violent operation is put into effect. 165. My Government, my delegation and I myself have always had the highest regard for the proceedings of the United Nations, and in particular for those of the Security Council. We are conscious of the need for a serious 
analysis: This text appears to be a diplomatic statement or a speech by a representative of the Angolan government, responding to allegations made by the South African government. The content focuses on international relations, politics, and security, with no mention of economic, social, or environmental issues. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting that the text is intended to persuade or educate an audience on the matter.