text: 39/50 A. i! voted in favour ot i! and consequently conslders the resolution binalinq upon Saint Lucia. The Governnent, horrever, has had to take no additi.onal measures to bring Sain! Lucia in conpliance sith the nain proeislons of that resolution' or any other resolution concerning Nanibia, because, since its orn independence in l9?9, Saint Lucia has escheeed all political, econonic. ftllitary and cul.tural contact $ith south Afr ic a. 2. Saine Lucia fully supports General Assembly resolutions 2145 (XXI) of 27 October 1966 and 2248 (S-V) of 19 may 1967. Saint Lucia is also ln total agreement with the advisory oplnion of the International Court of Ju3tice of 2l June 19?l concerning the question of Nanibia. 4/ 3. Consistent l,ith General Assembly resolutions Es-8/2 ot 14 Septenber 1981 and 36/12l B of l0 Decenber 1981, by ?bich lhe Assembly called upon all States to cease all dealings l,ith south Africa, on 30 June 1985 the Governnent of sainc Lucia ratified its earlier decision to pronulgate the folloi'lnq leqislalion: (a) To refuse landi.nq and passage facilities to all alrcraft belonging to the racist r6qime of south Africa and conpanies reqistered under the laxs of South Africai (b) To close ports to all vessels flying rhe South African flag, except for hunanitari,an reasons in an emerqencyi (c) To prohibit airlines and shipping lines registered in Saint Lucia from providing sereices to and tron South Africai (d)To terminate visa-free entry privileges to South African nationalsi (e) To prohibit any official travel by South African Airuays or South Afrtcan sh ipping 1i nes iA/40/687 English Paqe 14 (f) To refrain froo any Purchase, direct or indirect, of South African Productsi (9) To prohibit entry into Saint Lucia of holders of South Afrlcan passports. 4. As a nenber of the Cornmonrealth. Saint Lucia is most supportlve of the Final
analysis: The text appears to be a statement made by the government of Saint Lucia regarding its stance on South Africa and Namibia. It discusses the country's independence, its relations with South Africa, and its decisions to implement economic and travel sanctions against South Africa. The text also mentions the country's support for United Nations resolutions and the International Court of Justice's advisory opinion.