text: United Nations beaome, at the same time, parties to the statute of the court. W Q trial 152. The understanding w&b reached that instead of eatsblishinq separate courts for different categories of arimeu, as is provided for in relevant aonventions, it would be preferable to have a single organ for international ariminal justice. 153. The option of entrusting the International Court of Justice with jurisdiatioa in ariminal actions against individuals was discussed. It was pointed out that auoh jurisdiation would require amendments to its statute, It would be necessary to obtain the viewa of the Internatfonal Court of Juetiae on this option. 154. A proposal was made to aomplement national courts with judges from other legal systsme, in matter8 of cane6 of international crimes. This proposal was not made as an alternative to an international court but, rather, as a transitional step to possibly overcome certain diffiaultieP in the application of the system of universal national jurisdiction. (9) w 155. The Commission’s examination of the question reflected a broad rqreement, in principle, on the desirability of the establishment of a permanent international criminal court to be brought into relationship with the United Nations system, although different views were expressed as to the structure and scope of jurisdiction zI such a court. There are at least three possible models varying mainly with respect to the competence and jurisdiction of the court. (1) Waiminal court withive s - This would necessitate that States cede their criminal jurisdiction as regards crimes coming under the jurisdiction of the court. - It may raise problems in relation to existing treaty obligations establishing universal jurisdiction under national tribunals. - 52 -- Recourse to a review procedure within the court’s system has to be provided for. .U/ - It necessarily leads to the establishment of a system of pre-trial
analysis: The text discusses the establishment of a permanent international criminal court, its structure, and jurisdiction. It seems to be focused on the legal and judicial aspects of international justice, rather than any specific area of human activity or sector.