text: 38. Miss DEREGIBUS (Argentina) said that her delegation supported the work being done by the Council for Namibia to attain the objective for which it had been established, namely the independence of the Namibian people. The persistence of unjust situations, such as that of the Namibian people, was contrary to the fundamental objectives of the United Nations. Her delegation, convinced that the Council for Namibia was performing its functions with imagination and efficacy, endorsed the statements by the representatives of the developing countries who had preceded it and supported the proposed activities and the administrative and financial requirements relating to them. It.was convinced that the Organization's contribution would help to bring nearer the day when Namibia would occupy its rightful place in the Organization. ; ... A/C.S/38/SR.52 English Page 10 39. Mr. ORTEGA (Mexico) said that his delegation regarded the Council for Namibia as the proper instrument for facilitating the Territory's attainment of independence and therefore wished to associate itself with the Kenyan delegation. It would vote for the amounts requested by the Secretary-General in order that the Council might perform the fundamental task entrusted to it. 40. Mr. YOACHAM (Chile) said that his country's support for the independence of Namibia was well known and that, despite the technical difficulties they presented, his delegation would vote for the approval of the administrative and financial requirements under consideration. 41. Mr. KAMAL (Pakistan) said that his delegation fully supported the legitimate struggle of the Namibian people and attached great importance to the role played by the Council for Namibia. Pakistan endorsed all the points made by the representative of Kenya in his eloquent statement and would vote in favour of the appropriations proposed by the Secretary-General, as approved by the Advisory Committee. 42. Mr. AKHTAR (Bangladesh) welcomed the international community's action in 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the political situation in Namibia and the efforts of the United Nations to support its independence. The speakers mention the Council for Namibia and the Secretary-General's proposals for administrative and financial requirements, which suggests that the topic is related to international relations and politics rather than economic development or other specific areas.