text: plan for Namibia and to impose an internal settlement 11 within the framework of the so-called Multi-Party Conference. 105. Once again the Pretoria regime has shown that it does not have the slightest intention of abiding by the letter or the spirit of the decisions and resolutions of the United Nations on Namibia but, on the contrary, is seeking to perpetuate its domination, oppression and repression of the heroic people of Namibia. 106. That “government”, which would be nothing but a colonial South African cabinet on Namibian territory, will not have international recognition, and consequently its actions will be null and void. Furthermore, it should be recalled that any solution for the Namibian problem will be valid only if it is adopted with the participation of SWAPO, the sole legitimate representative of the Na- mibian people, and if it is brought about within the frame- work laid down by the United Nations, since Namibia is an international Territory under the Mandate of the United Nations Council for Namibia, as the lawful Administering Authority of the Territory until it achieves independence. 107. It was in that context that the Coordinating Bureau of Non-Aligned Countries, meeting at New Delhi from 19 to 21 April 1985, considered that it would be useful for the Council to be convened so that it could fully discharge its responsibilities for the implementation of resolution 435 (1978). 108. These meetings of the Council present an excep- tional opportunity for us to live up to our commitments to the ideals, purposes and principles of the Charter and our international responsibilities in this year of the fortieth anniversary of the United Nations and the twenty-fifth anniversary of the adoption of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples. 109. Angola hopes that this time the Council will justify 
analysis: The text appears to be a statement from a government or organization, likely Angola, regarding the situation in Namibia. It discusses the lack of international recognition of a proposed internal settlement and the need for the United Nations to take action to ensure the independence of Namibia. The text does not mention economic development, natural resources, agriculture, industry, transport, communication, health, education, employment, humanitarian aid, or culture. However, it does touch on international relations and diplomacy, which are often related to science and technology.