text: 1984 10 334-453 393.5 11.7 294(13) 9.6(1.9) 36(-) 8.7 1985 10 333-451 392.3 11.7 303(11) 9.9(1.6) 37(-) 9.1 Total 1981 154 2848-3853 3350.6 100.0 2858(617) 100,0(100.0) 375(19) 100.0 1982 157 2849-3854 3351.4 100.0 2958(656) 100.0(100.0) 388(22) 100.0 1983 157 2848-3853 3350.0 100.0 3039(674) lOO.O(100.0) 402(28) 100.0 1984 158 2848-3853 3350.3 100.0 3055(687) 100.0(lOO.O) 411(30) 100.0 1985 159 2848-3853 3350.6 100.0 3065(406) 100.0(100.0) 406(29) 100.0 , ,A/40/652 Enqlish Paqe13 29.TableEhasbeenprepared inrespohse toanother concern oftheGeneral Assembly, which,inresolution 37/235, stressed theimportance ofhavinqthe larqest possible numberofMemberStatesrepresented atthehiqherlevelsofthe Secretariat, thatis,the0-2levelandabove, andrequested theSecretary-General toinclude inhisannualreports onthecomposition oftheSecretaria~ information ontheproqress madeinrespect oftheimprovement ofqeoqraphicaldistribution in theSecretariat. particularly atthehiqherlevels. Additional information canbe foundintable9oftheannextothiSreport. TableE 0-2andabovebyregion andnationality asat30June1985 (showinq thenumberoffemalestaff) USG ASG 0-2 Total AFRICA Alqeria 1 2 3 (1) (1) Conqo 1 1 Eqypt 1 2 3 Ghana 4 4 Mali 1 1 Mauritania 1 1 Niqeria 2 1 3 Seneqal 1 1 Sierra Leone 1 1 Somalia 1 1 Toqo 1 1 Tunisia 1 1 2 Subtotal 6 2 14 22 (1) (1) ASIAANOTHEPACIFIC Banqladesh 1 1 China 1 1 1 3 Fiji 1 1 India 2 2 4 8 Indonesia 1 1 Japan 1 2 3 6 Malaysia 1 1 Pakistan 1 1 2 4 Philippines 1 1 (1) (1) Subtotal 7 7 12 26 (1) (1) /...A/40/652 English Page14 TableE(continued) USG ASG D-2 Total EUROPE (Eastern) Hungary 1 1 poland 1 1 UnionofSoviet Socialist Republics 1 2 13 16 Yugoslavia 1 1 SUbtotal 2 3 14 19 EUROPE (Western) Austria 1 2 3 Belgium 1 1 Denmark 1 1 Finland 1 1 France 1* 2 3 6 (1) (1) Germany, Feder1>l Republic' of 1 1 2 Greece 1 1 Italy 1 1 2 Netherlands 2 2 Norway 1 1 Spain 1 1 Sweden 1 1 2 United Kingdom of GreatBritain and Northern Ireland 1 1 3 5 (1) (ll
analysis: This text appears to be a report on the composition of the United Nations Secretariat, providing information on the number of staff members from different regions and nationalities. The focus seems to be on the geographical distribution of staff at the higher levels of the Secretariat, rather than on specific economic or social issues. Therefore, it is likely that the category is not related to economic development, natural resources, agriculture, industry, transport, communication, international trade, health, education, employment, humanitarian aid, or culture.