text: Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples, to subsequent decisions on decolonization by the United Nations and to the Charter. The situation was worsened by the fact that the Administering Authority was attempting to present its annexation of the Trust Territory to the United Nations as a fait accompli. The Administering Authority, which sought to cover up its illegal activities by talking about a supposed statement of the will of the Micronesian people, stubbornly ignored the Declaration and did not provide information on its implementation. 181. Moreover, the representative of the United States had affirmed that under Article 83 of the Charter, the Administering Authority was responsible only to the Security Council with regard to Micronesia , and that General Assembly decisions did not concern the Trust Territory. The Soviet delegation had shown that concept to be groundless; it was used for the political and strategic interests of the united States and to keep the people of Micronesia dependent and subject to United States militarism. 182. There was nothing in Article 83 to prevent the General Assembly or any other United Nations organ from following the situation in the Territory. 183. The Soviet representative recalled that in its report to the General Assembly in 1984, 16/ the Special Committee had, among other things, reconfirmed the inalienabG right of the people of Micronesia to self-determination and independence. The Administering Authority, however, maintained that the people of Micronesia preferred to be dependent. 184. The representative of the Soviet union said that the compact and related agreements did not provide for the transfer of all power to the people Of Micronesia as called for in the Declaration but gave the Administering Authority power and competence in the areas of defence, foreign policy and other matters. 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the political situation in Micronesia, specifically the United States' administration of the Trust Territory and the rights of the Micronesian people to self-determination and independence. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting a UN report or resolution. The text highlights the contradiction between the US's actions and the UN's declarations, emphasizing the importance of the people's right to self-determination. It seems that the category should reflect the political and international aspects of the issue.