text: United Nations and the international community. We should require South Africa to give just compensation to the People’s Republic of Angola for the loss of life and the material damage that has resulted from its acts of aggression. 68. It is in this spirit that we, along with the delegations of Burkina Faso, Egypt, India, Peru and Trinidad and Tobago, have submitted the draft resolution now before the Council in document S/17531. 69. The PRESIDENT: The next speaker is the represen- tative of Zambia. I invite him to take a place at the Council table and to make his statement. 70. Mr. SIKAULU (Zambia): I should like to begin by congratulating you, Sir, on your assumption of the presi- dency of the Security Council for this month. I am confi- dent that, with your rich diplomatic background, you will preside over the Council with great skill and a sense of purpose. 71. May I also congratulate the representative of the United Kingdom, Sir John Thomson, on the able manner in which he presided over the Council Iast month. 72. It is rather remarkable that until last Friday, when it adopted resolution 573 (1985), the Security Council was alternately considering two serious cases of aggression committed almost at the same time against two African countries, Angola and Tunisia. The acts of aggression against Angola and Tunisia have been committed by two regimes, those of South Africa and Israel respectively, known to be close friends and collaborators in the military field. 73. Both regimes are famous for their intransigence, for their arrogance and utter contempt for the United Nations, including the Security Council. Indeed, both regimes have no regard for the norms of international law, which they break at will, relying heavily on their awesome military 
analysis: The text appears to be a diplomatic statement discussing a conflict between South Africa and Angola, with the speaker calling for just compensation for the loss of life and material damage caused by South Africa's acts of aggression. The language used is formal and official, suggesting that it is a statement made in an international forum, likely the United Nations Security Council. The topic does not seem to be related to economic development, natural resources, industry, transport, communication, international trade, health, education, employment, or culture. However, it could be related to humanitarian aid and relief or science and technology if one were to stretch the interpretation.