text: the protection of ita alli- and puppets, such (r Israel, by refusing to psy itr amessed amtributiom to the United Nations budget, which new total over d 500 rillion. Further-e, bY Producing this illegal resolution, the United States k increaring the reriournew and conplexity of the l ituation. It is forcing an esclrlation Of ten#ion and a rwort to armd force, .&fch will lead to an aplaion of the situation even befa8 the Secretary-General*8 report QI the irplementatior, of ecmk nasuru is rubdttid on 5 Sepellber. That ir in oorplete JP/cu $/PV. 2 9 30 73- 75 (Mr. Al-Anbari, Iraq) contradiction of the ain and objectives of the Security Council and of the Charter of the United Nations. Therefore the United States, which has mssed its attack forces in the hrab Gulf region , .dm umd the Security Count il to ensure the implmentation of its plan, a plan rsentially aind at using force against Iraq and servinq the interesta of the United Statea ad the expansionist interests 0.f zionimm in the region, as well as United States hegemny over the wealth of the region, shipping in the Gulf and the destiny of tha peoples of the Gulf. Ms/18 s/w.2938 76 (Mr. Al-Anbari, Iraq) In our view, a sttanps phenomena\ is takirq place in this Council. It weakens the credibility of the Security Council and the Council’s ability to implecwnt its resolutions by peaceful means. Moreover, it replaces internationel leqittnacy on the high seas with the arbitrary individual use of force under the uhrella of the Security Council unfurled through the adoption of an illcqitimate reSOlUt.iOn. The full historical responsibility for this falls squarely on the shoulders of the United States of America and its allies. Many of the speakers aho preceded me referred to the importance of continuinq 
analysis: The text appears to be a speech or statement from an Iraqi representative at the United Nations, criticizing the actions of the United States and its allies regarding Iraq. The language used is formal and diplomatic, with references to international law and organizations. The main concerns expressed are the potential use of force and the implications for international relations, rather than specific economic, social, or environmental issues.