text: overthrw the r&qime and establish a new regime and a Government friendly to Iraqn. Tn that respect, I should like to assure the Council that Sheikh Jaber Al-Ahmad Al-Sabah, Amk of Kuwait, Sheikh Sa’ad Al-Abdulla Al-Sabah, the Prime Yinister, and the Government of Kuwait remain in control in Kuwait and are defendinq the country %s security. Iraq’s pretext for invadinq an in&P?ndent , swerefqn State is false and unwarranted. This matter ie a caum for surprise in terms of international relations and particularly of relations between friendly, sisterly countries. If not deterred in a decisive manner by the Council , such action will threaten 311 international relations. No country will be safe after this, and the security, sovereignty and territorial inteqrity of every State wil.1 be jeopardised. It is in&ed alarming that the invasion should come from Iraq, an Arab country with which we share a number of ties rooted in history. It is wually appallinq that the invasion should come leas than one day after a rounrl of talks between OCIC two countries in Jiddah, Saudi Arabia, at the very high political level of deputy leader of each country. In those talks, the Kuwaiti delegation was headed by Sheikh Sa’ad Al-Ab&(lla Al-Sabah, the Prime Minister, and the Iraqi deleqa:ion J’15 hmded hy Mr. Tzzat 41-Doury, the neplt-4 Chairman of the Yevolutionary Command C-JIJ~ :: i! . JB/6 S/PV. 2932 7 *vr. Rh~ll5w 13, Kuwait) He discussed all points of view and all disagreements between our two countries. Through its Crwn Prince and Prime Mini&ear, Kuwait has expressed its willinqnem to continue bilateral negotiations in Kuwait and Raqhdad in order to reach a just and honourable solution that would take into account the legitimate rights of both countries. The only way to deal with this natter , which has already been Qalt with 
analysis: The text appears to be a diplomatic statement from a country, likely Kuwait, reacting to Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. The language used is formal and emphasizes the importance of international relations, sovereignty, and territorial integrity. The statement mentions a previous round of talks between the two countries and expresses a willingness to continue negotiations to find a peaceful solution.