text: has asked to make a statement, and I call upon him. 133. Mr. DE FIGUEIREDO (Angola): On behalf of my delegation, I would like to thank the Council for the effort it has put into the meetings called at the request of the Government of the People’s Republic of Angola once again to draw international attention to the most recent violations of the Charter of the United Nations by the outcasts of the international community, the racist apart- heid regime of South Africa. 134. The representative of the racist minority regime-a regime guilty of the most terrible violation of the most fun&mental rights mside South Africa itself, a regime which is in illegal occupation of a Territory under the administration of the United Nations, a regime guilty of violations of international law, a regime which invades the territory of neighbouring sovereign States, a regime which even as we meet has its troops entrenched on the soil of Angola-the representative of that regime refers to “demo- cratic countries” [2612th meetifig, para. 2.Q What would - _ he or his regime know of democracy when-apartheid is its very antithesis? What would he or his regime know of “true Africans” [ibidJ? Who does he mean? Are the 22 million disenfranchised majority inhabitants of South Africa included in that term? If so, why are they denied their rights in their homeland? 135. I must, however, concede the truth of one phrase in the opening remarks of the Pretoria representative, when he referred to the people of Angola who “fought on alone against foreign interventionists” [ibid.]. Yes, the courage- ous FAPLA, the Angolan armed forces, supported by the Angolan people, have fought on alone against the foreign racist interventionists from South Africa intervening on behalf of their proteges. We heard the representative of 
analysis: This text appears to be a diplomatic statement condemning the actions of the apartheid regime in South Africa and the intervention of South African troops in Angola. The language used is highly critical and accusatory, suggesting a strong political or ideological tone. The text does not mention any specific economic, environmental, or scientific issues, but rather focuses on the political and human rights implications of the conflict.