text: to her original employment for the International Year of the Child, cannot be considered extensions of the original appointment. VI.The Tribunal finds that in this case, the tasks performed by the Applicant after completion of the International Year of the Child Project, were of an ad hoc and temporary nature; namely for the Kampuchea Operation and the History Project. The Respondent may very well have been justified in employing the Applicant under special service agreements, if the alternative was that the- 12 - Applicant would have had no employment at all. Unlike in Isaacs, it cannot be considered that these agreements were a substitute for an appointment as a staff member, or an extension of her original appointment. VII.In the Tribunal's view, in accordance with its jurisprudence, no legal expectancy of further employment could have arisen at the expiration of the special service agreements, nor after the addition of another period of service performed under a short-term contract as a staff member. VIII.The Tribunal notes that during the course of her employment, the Applicant applied for a series of posts, but was unsuccessful in obtaining permanent employment. The Respondent, in order to accommodate her, extended the Applicant's consultancies, but informed her on a number of occasions, that he was not in a position to consider further extensions of the consultancies because he was acting against his own directives concerning long-term employment on special service agreements. The Tribunal considers that this practice, although favourable to the Applicant in this case, since it enabled her to continue rendering services and receiving remuneration, should not be resorted to by the Administration. IX.In the light of the above, the Tribunal is satisfied that on the facts of this case, the Applicant did not have a legal expectancy of continued employment as a staff member, neither at the
analysis: The text appears to be related to an employment dispute within an international organization, specifically discussing the terms of an appointment and the expectations surrounding continued employment. The language used is formal and legal, suggesting a professional setting. The context does not seem to be related to a specific sector or field, such as economic development or natural resources, but rather focuses on the employment contract itself.