text: to avoid invokinq the authority and purview of the Security Council under the provisions of Article 42 of the Charter. JP/IX s/w. 2938 71 (Mr. Al-Anbari, Iraq In my opinion, the reasons aLe as follows. Pirst, Article 42 is invoked on the basis of the Security Council’s assessment, in the light of a report submitted by the Secretary-General, of the effectiveness of economic measures and their SuCCess. However, the spnsors of the resolution, in their haste, did not find it easy to wait for 5 September , when the Secretary-General is to submit his report. what is sore important, and more dangerous , the sponsors endeavoured to undermine the Security Council’s authority and to circunwent the mechanisms enshrined in the Charter md embodied in the Security Council and tried to take control of that authority. We believe that the haste and prtHdUrC?S in producing the rea3OlUtlOn are designed to facilitate large-scale military aggression by United States forces, now masuing in the oil fields of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, in w-Operation with Israeli armed forces and intelligence circles. For that reason, the resolution, while underraining the security Council’s authority, is void in substance and detail. The Security Council has no right to dapcive itself of its own authority, or to &legate that authority to a nuaber of States , unless the Charter is properly aaanded . mrmver, the resolution is very dangerous. It lays cbwn rm logical basis for the use of force, It gives no real authority to the Security Council, the Military Staff -ittee, the Security Council Cmittee concerned or the Seoretary-General in supervising the use of force’by maritime States, Unoontrolled and unoontained force leads to tyranny and oppression. That is true of the use of force under the resolution. As I have said, there are no real 
analysis: The text appears to be a diplomatic statement or speech, likely from the Iraqi representative to the United Nations, criticizing a resolution proposed by the Security Council. The language used is formal and technical, with references to international law and the UN Charter. The main argument revolves around the legitimacy and potential consequences of the resolution, which seems to relate to the use of military force. Given this context, it is likely that the text is related to international relations, security, or conflict resolution.