text: question has been answered by every single ember of the unitid Nations ma every single metier of the security Council. S/W. 292 6 23-25 (Mr. Mksoud) Yet Israel wants to have exclue’ive ccntrol. unt-il i&en? ltatael does not answer . If&r&d. is obsessed with the notion of having exclusive control, period. Until when? No answer. By whose authority? NO answer. That is the rub in this question1 that is the core issue we ace facing. And, as I stated in Geneva, ~sca& does not consider the Palestinians enemies, SO that the rule of enmity and belligerency can be resolved. Israel &es not consider the Palestinians to be adversaries but the human obstacleS t0 fts translating its exclusive jurisdiction into exclusive annexation. That is the cential issue that we have ccmtinuously avoided addressing because we have scught to accomdatr. Jwg s/Iv. 292 s 2s CR&. e&k soud) Acoocdinq to Israel, the PLO incites. Put why does tile populakion of Palestine respond if they ace so alienated, if, as Israel in its political hallucination believes, the PLO is something separate from the Palestinian people? The PLO, once and for all, is the framework of Palestinian peoplehood. The people 02 Palestine under occupation, in the refugee camps and the diaapora, ace all constituent seotors of the PLO. The PLO is therefore the framework of our peoplehood. The bitter antagonism that Israel exhibits towards the PLO arifses fcom the fact that recognition of the PLO means that there is a Palestin ian people. They are not Palestinian Arab inhabitants of unnamed territories. That is the situation. That is the issue. The PLO is the national identity of the Palestinians in the absence of their passports and identities. It is their state of mind in tie absence of their independent State. Yet the Israeli representative comes here and distorts the realities of the historical 
analysis: The text appears to be a speech or statement by a representative of the Palestinian people, likely in the context of a diplomatic or international setting. The language used is formal and diplomatic, and the content revolves around the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, with a focus on the recognition of the Palestinian people and the status of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). The text does not mention specific economic, environmental, or technological issues, but rather addresses political and social aspects of the conflict.