text: striking him three times, before he managed to get clear of the car and hide in long grass nearby." There is no evidence whatsoever to the effect that the lift was given to any of the accused or that it was the accused who shot Mr. Thobela. On page 897 of the record, the judgement reads as follows: "Frans had borrowed a Valiant car from the owner and he was asked, having been in a shop to buy some cool drinks, to give a lift to two people. He was good enough to do so. They got into the back of the car. Near Onderstepoort they told him to stop and give them the car. He said 'no·. He brought the car to a halt. These people. terrorists, shot him at point-blank range and managed to shoot him three times with something that looked like a Makarov pistol before he had got clear of the car. They shot him with as much compunction as they would have shot an ox in the shambles. He was lucky. He managed to get to some long grass and although_ these tw_o people, <;>r one of them certainly, went up and down looking for him. they did not find him." It will be observed that there is no statement by the judge as to the accused having been in the car or_ having carried <;>ut the shooting. The judge went on to say that "this is not something that simply can be overlooked. It was argued, but faintly. that perhaps accused No. 3 is not connected with this, but that cannot ~o up. He knew perfectly well that this car had been stolen. So did accused Nos. I and 2. It was in fact the car, we know that. that was used in the attack on the Wonderboompoort police station". The 
analysis: The text appears to be a court transcript or a passage from a legal document, discussing a crime scene and the involvement of accused individuals. The context is unrelated to any of the categories related to economic development, natural resources, agriculture, industry, international trade, health, education, employment, humanitarian aid, or science and technology. The only category that seems remotely relevant is Transport and Communication, as the text mentions a car being borrowed and used in an attack. However, the primary focus of the text is on the crime and the accused individuals, making it more likely to fit under a category related to Human Rights or Justice.