text: 34. Mr. TOMMO MONTHE (United Republic of Cameroon) said that it was painful for him to hear each year the same people making the same complaints and putting forward the same arguments in the Fifth Committee while still reaffirming their devotion to the cause of Namibia. In view of the adoption of Security Council resolution 435 (1978), there should be no hesitation about approving appropriations for Namibia for the objectives currently proposed. So long as what should be done to ensure the implementation of that resolution had not been done, there would be no reason to complain. With regard to the tec~nical arguments put forward at the current meeting, he reminded the Committee that the Council for Namibia was not a typical United Nations body and that to restrict its scope for action would be tantamount to putting off the independence of the Territory. 35. Mr. GARRIDO (Philippines) said that his delegation reaffirmed its support for the efforts being made by the Namibian people to attain a long-awaited independence. It considered that the proposed exceptions to General Assembly resolutions would facilitate the achievement of the objectives of the Namibian people and would therefore support the administrative and financial requirements deriving from the recommendations made by the Council for Namibia. 36. Mr. SIBOMANA (Burundi) said that his delegation endorsed the statement by the representative of Kenya; if there were cases in which exceptions should be made, that of Namibia was certainly one. Everything should be done to ensure the Territory's accession to independence and the proposed exceptions were justified. 37. Mr. BOUGUERRA (Algeria) said that his delegation would oppose anything which might directly or indirectly hamper the efforts of the Council for Namibia to ensure the independence of the Territory. It therefore supported the Secretary­ General's proposal and appealed to all members of the Committee to do the same. 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the allocation of resources and budget for the implementation of a specific resolution related to Namibia's independence. The speakers are expressing their support or opposition to the proposal, citing the importance of achieving Namibia's independence and the role of the Council for Namibia. The language used is more political and diplomatic rather than technical or scientific.