text: existing wording of paragraph 7 should be retained, including the word "direct", lest any subsidiary body might say that it was not directed by the Council to undertake certain actions. 66. Mr. LEE (Canada) said that that wording should be retained because it respected the division of powers and functions among the various United Nations organizations and institutions. 67. Mr. MALIK (India) was in favour of replacing the words "decides to direct all" by "requests". 68. Mr. F AREED (Pakistan) observed that the word "direct" had been used in order to strengthen the request. 69. Mr. MALIK (India) said that, if no substantial financial saving would result from making the change, the wording might be retained, with the clear understanding, however, that the Council was direct­ ing no one but itself. 70. The PRESIDENT said that, if he heard no objection, he would take it that the Council wished to adopt paragraph 7 as it stood. It was so decided. PARAGRAPH 8 7I. Mr. SEV AN (Secretary of the Council) read out the following changes in the list of questions referred to in document E/I986/I/Add.I: the "Report of the Secretary-General on a system-wide medium-term plan for women and development" should be trans­ ferred from the section entitled "Advancement of women" to the section entitled "International co­ operation and co-ordination within the United Na­ tions system"; and the "Report of the Secretary­ General on patterns of consumption" should be DRAFf DECISIONS PROPOSED BY THE PRESIDENT IN DOCUMENT E/I986/L.9/ADD.I, ON BEHALF OF THE BUREAU OF THE COUNCIL, ON THE BASIS OF INFORMAL CONSULTATIONS 72. The PRESIDENT invited the Council to take action on draft decisions I and 2 that he proposed on behalf of the Bureau, on the basis of informal consultations, in document E/ 1986/L.9/ Add.I, name­ ly: I, "System-wide medium-term plan for women 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing United Nations decisions and actions related to the organization's structure and operations, rather than specific economic or social issues. The language used is formal and bureaucratic, suggesting that the text is focused on administrative or procedural matters.