text: 10 September 1932, wh^n ic was introduced by Mrs. de Sousa. 288. At the same meeting the Sub-Commission adopted the draft resolution without a vote. 289. The t-.xt of th» resolution as adopted apD^nrs in chapter XXI, section A, as resolution 1982/31. 290. At its 34ch and 37th nsjtings, on 3 and 10 September 1982, the Sub-Comraission decided on the composition of its Working Group on Indigenous Populations. The composition of one Group is gxvan in chapter XXI, section B, decision 1982/13. 32/ Summaries of the Special Rapporteur's and Chairman-Rapporteur's statements appear in E/CIM/SuD.2/1932/sn.25.E/CH.4/1903/4 E/CN.4/Sub.2/1982/43 page 55 XIII. THE HEW INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC ORDER AMD THE PROMOTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS 291. The Sub-Commission considered agenda item 13 at its 19th to 21st meetings held on 27 and 30 Aupust 1982, and at its 32nd meeting on 7 September 1982. The Sub-Commission had before it Part One of the Final Report on the New International Economic Order and the Promotion of Human Rights (E/CN.4/Sub.2/l982/l9/Rev.l and Add.l) prepared by Mr. Raul Ferrero, Special Rapporteur, in accordance with Sub-Commission resolution 8 (XXXII). 292. In introducing the first part of his Final Report the Special Rapporteur indicated that he had endeavoured to take account of all the comments made by members of the Sub-Commission at its thirty-fourth session with respect to his progress report (E/CN.4/Sub.2/477). 293» All speakers congratulated the Special Rapporteur on his excellent work. It was said that the Special Rapporteur had been responsive to earlier comments made by members of the Sub-Commission and that he was in the process of producing a very important study. It was also proposed that his report should be transmitted to the Working Group of Governmental Experts on the Right to Development at its next session. 294* It was suggested that, in the preparation of the final report, more account
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the work of the Sub-Commission on the promotion of human rights, specifically in relation to the New International Economic Order. The language used suggests that the report is focused on the relationship between economic development and human rights. There is no direct mention of natural resources, environment, agriculture, forestry, fishing, or industry, which suggests that these categories are unlikely to be relevant.