text: Secretary-General and to his Special Representative, Ambassador Gunnar Jarring, we find only condemnations of Israel and the ever-renewed intention of the Security Council to envisage new measures provided by the Charter against Israel. 16. My delegation seriously thinks that the game has gone on too long and that it is time for the Security Council to discharge its responsibilities, The defiance of the imperialist and Zionist alliance, which is also that of all of the forces of colonialism and fascism in Africa and throughout the world, has lasted too long, endangering the credibility of the United Nations. The United Nations is duty bound to take up this challenge by energetic and effective action. 17. How can we tolerate having Israel, which was created out of whole cloth by a United Nations decision through depriving the Palestinian people of their national territory, able today to defy this Organization to which it owes its existence? How can we continue to tolerate its intran- sigence and its arrogance? 18. We continue to believe that Security Council reso- lution 242 (1967) is still the most appropriate framework for a solution. Indeed, the Security Council, under that resolution, first of all “1. Ajj‘kms that the fulfilment of Charter principles requires the establishment of a just and lasting peace in the Middle East which should include the application of both the following principles: “ (i) Withdrawal of Israel armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict; “(ii) Termination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and acknowledgement of the sover- eignty, territorial integrity and political inde- pendence of every State in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force; “2. Afj%m further the necessity “(a) For guaranteeing freedom of navigation through 
analysis: This text appears to be a speech or statement from a country's representative at the United Nations, criticizing Israel's actions and calling for the UN to take action to address the situation. The language used is strong and accusatory, with references to colonialism, fascism, and imperialism. The text also mentions specific UN resolutions and principles, indicating a focus on international relations and diplomacy.