text: for the ever-chronic Middle East problem, a settlement fulfilling the rights of all States and peoples of the region to existence and security, to territorial integ- rity and sovereignty, and particularly the national legitimate rights of the Palestinian people to self- determination and to statehood in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. That stand is based on the fact that the Palestinian question is the core and crux of the Middle East problem and that no lasting and comlprehcnsivz solution of it could be attained without a just seltle ment for the Palestinian question in all its aspects. The dispersion of the Palestinians could never be an antidote for the problem unless it were done within the framework of a comprehensive settlement of their question. 36. Well-grounded instruments that c<ould help achieve peace in the Middle East are Council rcsulu- tions 242 (1967) and 338 (1973). In this context. Egypt re-emphasizes the validity of these resolutions in th unrelenting work towards a comprehensive and lasting settlement of the Middle East question. The signifi- cance of these resolutions emanates from the essence of the international principles embodied therein. particularly the principles of the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war, the right of all Stfttes of the region to live in peace and security within their recognized international boundaries and the resolving of disputes through peaceful means. These principles’ constitute a pathfinder for the achievement of il jusl. and comprehensive peace in the Middle E.ast. These resolutions should, however, be read within the context of the purposes and principles of the Chnrter of the IJnited Nations which provide for the right 0f all peoples to self-determination ahd fundamental human rights and freedom. 37. In this context, we are gratified to note that in the 
analysis: The text appears to be focused on international relations, conflict resolution, and peace-building in the Middle East, specifically addressing the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting that it may be a statement or resolution from a government or international organization. The text emphasizes the need for a comprehensive and lasting settlement of the conflict, which implies a focus on political and humanitarian aspects rather than economic or environmental issues.