text: consideration of additional provisions for article 61 (former article 62) on the basis of a proposal by the Mediterranean and Scandinavian (MESCA) group of countries contained in section IS of document A/C.3/45/WG.l/CRP.l as follows: "1 l . . . “(c) To have their earnings paid in their State of origin or the State of their normal residence , without prejudice to article 47 of the present Convention. "4. Without prejudice to existi3g instruments on social security and * double taxation among States concerned, the States concerned shall take appropriate measures to ensure that project-tied workers: “(a) Are adequately covered for the purposes of social security and do not suffer in their State of origin or normal residence any denial of rights or duplication of social security deductions; “(b) Do not suffer from double taratioa, without prejudice to article 48.” and a proposal by tha representative of Finland as follows: "3. Subject to bilateral or multilateral agreements in force for the States Parties concerned, these States Parties ehall endeavour to enable project-tied workers to remain adequately protected by the social security systems of their State of origin or normal residence during their engagement in the project. The State Parties concerned shall take appropriate measuTt)s with the aim of avoiding any denial of rights or duplication of payments in this respect. "4 . Without prejudice to the provisions of article 47 and to specific bilateral or multilateral agreements, the States Parties concerned shall ----. .-.- ~WLIIIL~ ydy~w~ri VL iiw aarnirgs of project-tied workers in their State of origin or norm&l residence. ” / , . . A/C.314511 English Page 9 25. In introducing the proposal, the representative of Finland indicated that the proposed paragraph 3 was intended to ensure that project-tied migrant workers were able to participate in the social security systems of their State of origin and to 
analysis: The text discusses the social security and taxation of project-tied workers, who are migrant workers engaged in projects in other countries. The proposals aim to ensure that these workers are adequately covered by social security systems and do not suffer from double taxation. This suggests that the category is related to employment and economic activities.