text: domes tic legal sys terns, for remedies that permit prompt and adequate compensation or other reparation of transbouadary harm caused by activities referred to In article 1 carried out under their jurisdiction or control. (c) Except for the affected State, the other persons referred to in the preceding article who consider that they hwe been injured may elect to institute proceedings either in the courta of the affected Stats or in those of the State of origin. The court shall apply its national law in all matters of substance or procedure not specifically regulated by these articles. These articles and also the national law and legislation shall be applied without any discrimination whatsoever based on nationality, domiciie or residence. States may not claim inwnunity from jurisdiction under national legislation or international law in respect of proceed!ngs instituted under the preceding articles, save in respect of enforcement measures. “Ar* Enforcesbilitvoil 1.When a final judgement made by the competent court is enforceable under the laws applied by that court, it shall be recognised in the territory of any other Contracting Party, unlessr - 280 -been presented before the domestic courts, the affected State was barred from presenting a claim for the same hrxm for which such olaim had been made. Claims might be instituted against the State of origin or a liable private party in the courts of the affected State, 522. The Special Rapporteur mentioned two issues that must be resolved in respect of private law remedies: first, access to courts for all affected parties including the affected State and secondly the availability of remedies in applicable domestic laws. To resolve the former, Statee should, through their national leqislation, give their courts subject-matter jurisdiction over claiins in respect of transboundary harm covered by these articles. To resolve the latter, States should make sure that reasonable pecuniary and other forms
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the legal framework for addressing transboundary harm caused by various activities, such as environmental pollution or damage to natural resources. The focus is on the legal remedies available to individuals or states affected by such harm, including the recognition of foreign judgments and the availability of private law remedies. The text does not seem to be related to economic development, agriculture, forestry, or fishing, as it does not discuss specific economic activities or industries. Instead, it appears to be more concerned with the legal framework for addressing harm caused by human activities.