text: Ccami ttee of the Security Council - which was created not last week but exactly 13 years ago - entrusted with monitor fnq the implementa ticm of the embarqo against the South African &gfme , and this io not a trade embargo but an arms embarqo. A few weeks ago we saw a document from a prestigious nongovernmental organization which indicated that more than one Member of the United Nations and of the Security Council was failing to comply strictly with the provisions of that embargo. The idea has been mentioned of us inq the naval forces of certain States that have these means available, and are willing to provide them, to contribute to ensuring that the Committee on the South African arms embargo is able to work more effectively. We look forward to receiving propo3als on these lines on 17 August. But I think that I should call the attention of all members to the fact that it is not of benefit TV the immense majority of mankind to accept the imposition, as a practice 02 our Organization, of these selective approaches based on the priorities of just certain quarters. We think - and this is the only point that we have been stressing conetantly in the past few days of private consultations - that we must act when all the media disclose and announce that there are some who are marching towards war, who are preparing for war; when calcula tione are made about the consequences thin could have for their forces or military means. We think that it would be very irresponsible of the Security Council not to take this fact into account and not to act, and act immediately. This has nothing to do with the adoption of resolution 662 (1990) , which we voted in favour of. 
analysis: The text discusses the implementation of an arms embargo against South Africa, which is a political and security-related issue. It also touches on the idea of naval forces contributing to ensuring the effectiveness of the embargo, which suggests a military or defense-related aspect. Additionally, the text expresses concerns about the potential consequences of not taking action, which implies a sense of urgency and importance. Based on these points, it is likely that the text falls under the category of international relations and security.