text: military forces to implement any of its resolutions, but those forces are already de ployed. The Security Council has not yet determined that the measures it previously decided upon have prwed inadequate. The Council has not even been able - or will not be able, apparently - to wait until the Secretary-General submiti the first report co the implementation of security Council resolution 661 (1990f, which, by agreement between the members OF the Council, should be issued about 6 Sepbzmber. Apart from this haste to move on to the use of force, or rather, to permit the force already unilaterally deployed in the area to continue doing what it has been doing - now with the blessing of the Security Council - the Council is now to confirm that there exists in the zone a B facto situation which was not authorized W it, which -8 not decided upon by it snd which has rnothing to & with the use of force in accordance with the Charter of the Organization. In addition to the fact that the Security Council has not taken the stand it should have taken and called for putting an end to that situation, which threatens to aggravate still further the grave conflict we have been dealing with for 83~ time, we are now being ask :d to endorse a validate an action which cannot be justified under law. Perhaps that is why it has been necessary to resort t0 EI stranqe and tortuous wording which has nothinq to do with tho concepts laid down in JsM/CW s/w. 2938 13- 15 (Mr. Alatcon & Quesada, Cuba) our Chartec and which specifically, in my delegation’s view, represents a clear violation of Article 41, Article 42, Article 43, paragraph 1, Article 46, Article 47, paragraph 1, and Article 48, paragraph 1. There will be very few 
analysis: The text appears to be a diplomatic statement discussing the use of military force and the implementation of United Nations Security Council resolutions. It references specific articles in the Charter of the Organization and mentions the deployment of forces in a particular region. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting that it is a statement made by a representative of a country in the United Nations. Given the focus on international relations, diplomacy, and the use of military force, it is likely that the text is related to international conflict or security.