text: acfrieved thrargh tie withdrawal of Iraqi forces and the full restaation of Kuwait’s sovereignty - will, we are convinced, serve or ba used, as pact of the designs of tire united Ytatee to intensify its interveniicm in a part of tie wvCiJ which it appears to regard as its awn property. I am grateful to Atiassador Pickering for something which, it s&arm to me, is quits illuminatinq. I listened very carefully to hie statement, as I always &, m.s/eaa s/w.2933 47 (Mr. Alarcon c% Quesada, Cuba) and, at the same time, I was following the text of the press release circulated by the United States Mission and containing the text of his statement. There were a number of additional paragraphs, additional ideas, which he inserted during his statement. Hcwever, there was one @xase which he left out, which is in the peess release but was not spcken by Ambassador Pickering. I can understand his reasons for not wanting to pronounce it, and I am grateful to him for having spoken as he aia. The second mragraph a-r page 2 of the text circulated by the United States Missim contains a reference to Security Council resolution 660 (19901, and thereafter it is statea that the Security Council rmst unequivocally establish today that the family of civil&d nations will not tolerate such behaviour, that is, the behaviour of a State which, accordinq to the text of the statement, fails to comply with the Council’s decision. After this comes a phrase which disappeared from the statement as spoken by the representative of the United States. It is very short, containing just four words, and I shall quote it a “not here, not ever. (1 That phrase could not be uttered because it highlights that inconsistency and that unacceptable selectivity of apgoach which the United States adopts with 
analysis: This text appears to be a diplomatic speech or statement, likely from a government official or representative, discussing international relations and politics. The language used is formal and diplomatic, with references to specific events and resolutions. The speaker is addressing the actions of the United States and the United Nations, and is critiquing the selective approach to international intervention.