text: exception of the proposed transfer of 28 posts to the regular budget. 80. The question of the transfer of posts from extrabudgetary funding to the regular budget had a long history. At the thirty-seventh session of the General Assembly, the Secretary-General had submitted a report reviewing the financing of the administrative costs of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (A/C.5/37/l), and the Advisory Committee had submitted its recommendations thereon in document A/37/7/Add.3. The Advisory Committee's observations had subsequently led to the adoption of General Assembly resolution 37/238, which had taken note of the report of the Secretary-General and had endorsed the Advisory Committee's view of how the proposed transfer of 65 Professional and 45 General Service posts to the regular budget should be dealt with. The Advisory Committee had proposed, and the General Assembly had accepted, that the transfers should be handled on a case-by-case basis. / ... A/C. 5/38/SR. 2 7 English Page 13 (Mr. Mselle) 81. The Secretary-General had proposed that 22 Professional and 6 General Service posts should be transferred to the regular budget in the biennium 1984-1985, and that 22 local-level posts should be transferred from the regular budget to voluntary funds. Consideration of the requests would have been facilitated had the Administration not invoked the AMS survey of the Office of the UNHffi. One of the AMS findings had been that 7 Professional and 7 General Service posts should be phased out. The Secretary-General, in submitting his estimates, had stated that the actual number of posts to be transferred to the regular budget would depend on how many of those 14 posts were actually phased out. For example, if it were decided not to phase out the 7 Professional posts, the net addition to the regular 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing administrative costs and budget transfers within the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) organization. It mentions the transfer of posts from extrabudgetary funding to the regular budget, which suggests a focus on financial management and administrative matters rather than specific development or humanitarian projects.