text: courts of law. The Government had also helped certain national minorities to develop a written script. In many minority nationality areas, publishing houses, press agencies, and radio and television stations had been set up. The State placed great emphasis on health care in minority areas. In recent years, it had adopted and implemented effective measures specifically designed for those areas for the prevention and treatment of diseases. Family planning was mentioned in the Constitution and was a basic principle in China. Minority couples were allowed to have two children, and in sparsely inhabited areas, they could have three. In border districts, the State did not press family planning and couples were free to make their own decision in that regard. Turning to the subject of Tibet, he recalled that some members of the Committee had raised the issue of the province's political status. In the opinion of the Chinese Government, Tibet had been Chinese territory for many hundreds of years; in any case, the Committee was not competent to discuss the issue of sovereignty. He would, accordingly, confine himself to those questions which dealt exclusively with racial discrimination. In February 1951, two years after the foundation of the People's Republic of China, the local government of Tibet had reached an agreement with the central Chinese Government which had led to the peaceful liberation of Tibet and its incorporation as an autonomous region of the People's Republic of China. In 1959, at the request of the majority of Tibetans, democratic reforms had been undertaken. Previously, Tibet had been a feudal society, in which the monasteries, temples and local government -which represented only 5 per cent of the population -had owned all the land and means of production and had reduced the majority of the population to a state of serfdom. After 
analysis: The text primarily focuses on the Chinese Government's policies and actions towards minority nationalities and Tibet, discussing issues such as education, health care, family planning, and social reforms. The text does not mention economic development, natural resources, industry, transport, or international trade, which suggests that these categories are not relevant. The text also does not discuss humanitarian aid or relief, employment, or science and technology. While education and health are mentioned, they are not the primary focus of the text. Therefore, it is likely that the text is more closely related to the categories of culture and human rights.