text: tative of Argentina. I invite him to take a place at the Council table and to make his statement. 64. Mr. mIZ (Argentina) (interpretation from Span- ish): Mr. President, allow me to begin by congratulating you on your assumption of the presidency for September. Throughout the three years in which we have shared work together at the United Nations, my delegation has always appreciated your qualities as a gentleman and your diplo- matic skill. These qualities have greatly facilitated the important work of the Council this month, 65. I also wish to congratulate the representative of the Soviet Union, Mr. Troyanovsky, on the equanimity and sense of responsibility with which he presided over the meetings of the Council in August. 66. At the same time, Sir, through you, I should like to thank the other members of the Council for giving me an opportunity to take part in this debate. 67. The critical situation in southern Africa is a subject of special concern to my Government which shares the anxieties of the international community as to the uncer- tain future of that important region. 68. In our statement to the Council on 20 June last, we said that the repeated violations of the territorial sover- eignty of Angola and other African States by South Africa deserved the unanimous repudiation of the international community and a fitting response from the Council. We now reiterate that position. We condemn with the utmost emphasis the new and unwarranted armed aggression by South Africa against Angola, and we repeat our appeal to the Council to respond appropriately and effectively to this latest demonstration of the expansionism and intolerance which are the driving force behind Pretoria’s policies. It is essential that the Council, which bears primary responsibil- ity for the maintenance of international peace and security, 
analysis: The text appears to be a diplomatic statement by the representative of Argentina to the United Nations Security Council, addressing the situation in southern Africa. The statement does not mention economic development, natural resources, industry, transport, communication, international trade, health, education, employment, or culture. It does not seem to be related to humanitarian aid or relief, science and technology, or agriculture, forestry, and fishing. The focus is on international relations, politics, and security, which suggests that the category is likely to be related to international relations or diplomacy.