text: have just adopted an8 for its WilliaguesS to seek compromise formulation8 that made it pOSSibl5 for 811 SI6SlbeiS Qf the Council :Q SUppQrt the text. I q u8t, however, say that. t.U%fOrtUnately, the reSOh&iQn we IUWS jU8t adopted CQntainS 808N elements On which I must COIUWnt. Above all, the text reaffirms some resolutions with respect to which our pollitioa is not changed by the vote WQ have just castt thet vote should not be interpreted as reflecting a change in our position. In our view, resolution 665 (19901 Violates the United NatiQnS Chartert resolution 666 (1990). adopted only two dSys ago , cQntai9s aQprOaChe8 and ariteria which in our judgement are marred by inhumanity. My delegatbon would have preferred different wordiag iaa some paragraphs of the text we have gust adopted, where reference is mede to aggressive acts, which seem to us to be somewhat excessive since such eXpreSSiQnS were not used even in resolution 660 (1990), which referred to the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. We are also concerned about paragraph 6, Since it might be inferred that some Powers could use its prOViSiOn to exacerbate the conflict and press on to military action. BCT/ed WPV. 2940 31 We regret that no reference Is made in this text to the need to continue the efforts to find a peaceful solution to the conflict. We regret also that no space vas found to mention the responsibility and function in connection vith diplomatic missions in Kuwait that can and should devolve upon the Secretary-General. My delegation decided nevertheless to vote in favour of this resolution because we agree with the major elements of its operative part. We regard as absolutely unacceptable the actions in violation of the integrity of diplomatic premises and personnel in Kuwait. For Cuba, respect for and full implementation of Security Council resolutions 
analysis: The text appears to be a statement from a country's representative at the United Nations Security Council, discussing a recent resolution related to a conflict in Kuwait. The language used is formal and diplomatic, with a focus on the country's position and concerns regarding the resolution. The text does not mention economic development, natural resources, or environmental issues, but rather focuses on international relations, security, and diplomatic efforts.