text: Taking note of the letter dated 11 January 1990 from the Charge d'affaires a.i. of the Permanent Mission of Leba­ non to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary­ General, 15 Responding to the request of the Government of Leba­ non, 1. Decides to extend the present mandate of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon for a further interim period of six months, that is, until 31 July 1990; 2. Reiterates its strong support for the territorial integ­ rity, sovereignty and independence of Lebanon within its internationally recognized boundaries; 3. Re-emphasizes the terms of reference and general guidelines of the Force as stated in the report of the Secretary-General of 19 March 1978,1" approved by reso­ lution 426 (1978), and calls upon all parties concerned to co-operate fully with the Force for the full implementation of its mandate; 4. Reiterates that the Force should fully implement its mandate as defined in resolutions 425 (1978), 426 (1978) and all other relevant resolutions; 5. Requests the Secretary-General to continue consul­ tations with the Government of Lebanon and other parties directly concerned with the implementation of the present resolution and to report to the Security Council thereon. Adopted unu111111ously ,it t/11, 2906th meeting. Decision At its 2925th meeting, on 31 May 1990, the Council discussed the item entitled "The situation in the Middle East: report of the Secretary-General on the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force (S/21305)". 17 Resolution 655 (1990) of31 May 1990 The Security Council, Having considered the report of the Secretary-General on the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force, 1H Decides: (a) To call upon the parties concerned to implement immediately its resolution 338 (1973) of 22 October 1973; (b) To renew the mandate of the United Nations Dis­ engagement Observer Force for another period of six 
analysis: This text appears to be a resolution passed by the United Nations Security Council, dealing with a military or peacekeeping operation in Lebanon. The language used is formal and diplomatic, indicating a focus on international relations and conflict resolution rather than economic, social, or environmental issues.