text: 431. The draft resolution was adopted without a vote. 432. A statement in explanation of vote after the vote was made by the representative of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. 433. For the text as adopted, see chapter II, section A, resolution 1990/79. 434. A statement was made by the Observer for the Islamic Republic of Iran after the vote. -252-A. Question of human rights in Cyprus 435. In connection with agenda item 12 (a), the Commission had before it document E/CN.4/1990/21. 436. Statements were made 3/ by the following members of the Commission: Argentina (40th), Botswana (36th), Bulgaria (31st), China (42nd), Cuba (31st), Cyprus (31st), Ethiopia (31st), Ghana (37th), India (31st), Japan (42nd), Madagascar (39th), Mexico (40th), Nigeria (31st), Pakistan (41st), Sri Lanka (31st), Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic (31st), Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (39th), Yugoslavia (31st). 437. The Commission also heard statements by the Observers for: Algeria (43rd), Angola (36th), Austria (41st), Bolivia (43rd), Czechoslovakia (35th), Greece (39th), Ireland (33rd) (on behalf of the European Economic Community and its 12 member States), Syrian Arab Republic (35th). 438. A statement was also made by the Greek Orthodox Archdiocesan Council of North and South America (33rd). 439. Statements in right of reply or equivalent to right of reply were made by the representative of Cyprus (40th) and the Observers for Greece (43rd) and Turkey (39th and 44th). 440. At the 44th meeting, on 28 February 1990, the Chairman proposed that the debate on agenda item 12 (a) should be postponed to the forty-seventh session of the Commission and be given due priority at that session, it being understood that action required by previous resolutions of the Commission on that subject would continue to remain operative, including the request to the
analysis: The text appears to be a report from a United Nations Commission on Human Rights meeting, discussing the question of human rights in Cyprus. The language used is formal and official, suggesting that it is a formal document or resolution. The text mentions various countries and organizations making statements, which implies that the topic is a contentious one. Based on this, it is likely that the category is related to human rights or international relations.