text: devices (number ofpieces) Quantity Chemical. ftll (number of (inkg/piece) nieces' (Example: spraytanks'II "11Somedelegations didnotconsider thiscolumnnecessary. ri;', e--=~'- +-_.- , •tU o::r'(1)11)0 .... ~~g' ~5.2.I ..: (1)"tl."==....- - _.... -"4.Equipment specifioally designed forusedirectly inconnection with theemployment ofmunitions andotherdevices underpointsD:2and,. (Example: singlepurpose rocketlaunchers). "5.Chemicals specifically designed forusedirectly inconnection with theemployment ofmunitions andotherdevices underpointsD:2and,. (Example: thickeners). ~I "E.Locations anddetailed inventories ofohemioal weapons stooksto bedeolared beforetheoommenoement ofeaohelimination period ~I Foreaohstookthefollowing shallbedeolared: "1.Location Geographioal location expressed by••• "2.Detailed inventory Composition andquantities oftheohemioal weaponsshallbedeolared inaooordanoe withparagraph DofthisAnnex. "II.PLANSFORTHEELIMINATION OFCHEMICAL WEAPONS "A.General plans Thefollowing ohemioal weaponsshallbeeliminated duringElimination PeriodI:g,12/ ThefolloWing ohemioal weaponsshallbeeliminated duringElimination PeriodII:g,11/. eto. "B.Detailed plans Theyshallinolude: -sohedules indicating detailed timeframes, quantities andtypesof ohemioal weaponstobedest~oyed ordiverted topermitted purposes 41 inaccordanoe withthePrinoiples fortheElimination laiddownin­ AnnexIV, -53-Different viewsexistoonoerning, ifortowhatextentsuoh shouldbedeolared. Furthermore, itappearsthatthis q~estion tobedecidedinthelightofthefinaldefinition ofchemical"11 chemicals willhave weapons. "£1Somedelegations heldtheviewthatoveralldeclarations should bemadewithin30daysaftertheConvention's entryintoforceforQ StateParty. "21Chemical weaponsshallbedescribed andamounts indicated ina manneridentioal tothatofthedeolarations. "ilOnedelegation statedthatitwasunconvinoed thatdiversion was eitherapractical oreconomioal methodforelimination. Itmaybeprepared, however, toreviewitsposition intheeventapraotical systemfordiversion canbedevised, preserving therequirement foreffeotive verification.-looation offaoilities tobeusedfordestruotion ordiversion 11 andinformation oonfirming thatthefaoilities oanoonsume the­ quantities tobeeliminated withintheelimination period, -methods tobeusedforthedestruotion ordiversion, 11aswellas theendproduots, plansforverifioation ofthedestruotion anddiversion 11prooesses basedonthePrinoiples andMethods fortheVerifioation-of the Elimination ofChemical Weapons la1ddowninAnnexIV. "IV.MEASURES ONCHEMICAL WEAPONS ELIMINATION OFCHEMICAL WEAPONS£1 "1.EachStatePartypossessing chemical weapons.undertakes toeliminate through destruction ordiversion, 11asrapidly aspossible, allchemical weapons underitsjurisdiction orcontrolinacoordanoe withthePrinciples fortheElimination ofChemical WeaponslaiddowninAnnexIV. "2.Theelimination shallcommence within•••21monthsandbecompleted within10yearsaftertheConvention's entryintoforceforaStateParty, andshallbecarried outinaccordanoe withthePrinciples fortheOrderof Elimination laiddowninAnnexIVandtheplanssubmitted under Ar~icleIll. "S.Theelimination processshallbecarried outinsuohawaythattheend products areunsuitable forchemical weapons purposes. "4.EachStatePartypossessing chemical weapons undertakes tofacilitate andnottohinderinanywaytheapplication ofthePrinciples andMethods fortheVerification oftheElimination ofChemical Weapons, laiddownin AnnexIV. "5.Inimplementing theprovisions ofthisarticleallnecessary safety precautions shallbeobserved toprotect populations andtheenvironment.flI Li flA. tho fiB. con be "A. on "11Onedelegation statedthatitwasunconvinced thatdiversion was eitherapractical oreconomical methodforelimination. Itmaybe prepared, however, toreviewitsposition intheeventapractical system fordiversion canbedeVised, preserving therequirement foreffective verification. . "21Thequestion ofoldunknown weapons orstockswhichhavebeenleft byotherswithout theknowledge oftheStateParty,isnotaddressed· inthis Article. Itisunderstood thatthisquestion willbedealtwithatalater "B. stageofthenegotiations atwhichtimetheplacement intheConvention of earl
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the elimination of chemical weapons, their destruction or diversion, and the verification process. It also touches on the responsibilities of state parties possessing chemical weapons. The language used is formal and technical, suggesting a focus on international agreements and treaties. The context seems to be related to disarmament and arms control.