text: national Research and Training Institute for the Advancement of Women". 4. He invited the Council to take action on the draft resolutions. DRAFT RESOLUTIONS I, II, III AND IV Draft resolutions I, II, III and IV were adopted (resolutions 1986117, 1986/18, 1986/19 and 1986/20). DRAFT RESOLUTION V 5. The PRESIDENT said that paragraph 2 of draft resolution V had been adopted in the Second (Social) Committee by 43 votes to 1, with 8 abstentions. A recorded vote was taken on paragraph 2 of draft resolution V. In favour: Argentina, Bangladesh, Brazil, Byelorus­ sian Soviet Socialist Republic, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Djibouti, Egypt, Finland, Gabon, Ger­ man Democratic Republic, Guinea, Guyana, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Jamaica, Morocco, Mozam­ bique, Nigeria, Pakistan, Panama, Papua New Guin­ ea, Philippines, Poland, Romania, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sweden, Syrian Arab Republic, Turkey, Uganda, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, Venezuela, Yugoslavia, Zaire, Zimbabwe. Against: United States of America. Abstaining: Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Federal Republic of, Italy, Japan, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Paragraph 2 of draft resolution V was adopted by 43 votes to 1, with 8 abstentions. 6. The PRESIDENT said that paragraph 4 of the draft resolution had been adopted in the Second (Social) Committee by 41 votes to 1, with 9 abstentions. A recorded vote was taken on paragraph 4 of draft resolution V. In favour: Argentina, Bangladesh, Brazil, Byelorus­ sian Soviet Socialist Republic, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Djibouti, Egypt, Gabon, German Demo­ cratic Republic, Guinea, Guyana, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Jamaica, Japan, Morocco, Mozambique, Nige­ ria, Pakistan, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Philip­ pines, Poland, Romania, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Spain, Sri Lanka, Syrian Arab Republic, Turkey, Uganda, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, Venezuela, Yugoslavia, Zaire, Zimbabwe. Against: United States of America. Abstaining: Australia, Belgium, Canada, Finland, 
analysis: The text appears to be a record of a meeting or session of an international organization, discussing and voting on draft resolutions related to women's advancement. The language used is formal and technical, suggesting a focus on policy and governance rather than scientific or environmental issues. The specific language used, such as "national Research and Training Institute for the Advancement of Women", also points towards a focus on social and human development.