text: Talcing due account of the study prepared under the responsibility of Mr. Jose R. Martinez Cobos as Special Rapporteur of the Sub-Commission, which provides a solid basis for the Group's work. Also taking note of the exploratory and preliminary character of the Working Group's first session and of the recommendations transmitted to the Sub-Commission, which were presented during its session and which dealt with the principles to guide the Working Group, the necessary collection of information including all data contained in the study of the Special Rapporteur, the application of existing standards giving special attention to gross and consistent violations of human rights and the evolution of standards, including the eventual drafting of texts of principle's^ declarations and" conventions or this natter, 102/ Adopted at the 36th mseting, on 10 September 1982, without a vote. See chap. XII- 103/ E/CIM/Sub.2/1982/33 and E/CI.4/SUI.2/AC.4/1982/R.IE/Cff. 4/1983/1 E/CF.4/Sub.2/1982/43 page 106 Taking further note of the expressed desirability of maintaining a certain degree of continuity in the Working Group's membership in view of the complex and delicate nature of the subject attributed to it and with a view to facilitating the gradual evolution of standards and a continuing dialogue between members and observers, !• Commends the Working Group on the constructive approach taken and the positive results attained at its first session and the provisional recommendations mad.e by it, which have laid the basis for progress in future sessions in one of its primary tasks, namely the identification and development of standards concerning the rights of indigenous populations 1 2« Agrees that there should be a degree of continuity in the Working Group's membership °, 3' Requests that for future sessions such continuity be borne in mind when the members of the Group are appointed; 4« Also agrees with the Working Group in its preliminary identification of
analysis: The text appears to be discussing a United Nations working group focused on indigenous populations and their human rights. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting a high-level meeting or document. The content is centered around the rights and well-being of indigenous populations, which suggests a focus on human rights and social issues.