text: future clairn and legal viens of any state concerning the law of tbe sea and the nature and extent of coastal and flag State jurisdiction. The Contracting Parties agree to conault at a meeting to be convened by the organization after the Law of the Sea Conferencer and in any case not later than 1975, nith a view to defining the nature anal extent of tbe right and responsibility of a coastal stsate to apply the Conventlon in a "one adjacent to its coasE." The Contracting Partles 'rill also be glving attention, inter alia, co article vII (3) by which Eh€y agree to co-operate in the alevelopment of procedures for Ehe effectlve appllcation of the convention on che high seas,. including procedures for the reportinq of vesseLs and aircraft observed dunping in contravention of tbe Convention. The Consuleative Meetlng haa agreed that this matter should be considered in conjunction with articl,e XIII of the ConvenCion. The Office of the Special Reptesentative of the secr etary-ceneral for the Law of the sea wlll be co-operating nith Iuors LDC secretariaC on this q.anination of the relationship betlreen the London Durnping Convention and the Unieed Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. 63, The oslo Conniesion has studied the possible irnpLications of the provisions of the Convention on the Lal' of the Sea for the 1972 ConvenElon for the Preventlon of Marine PolLuti.on by Dumping fron Ships and Aircraft (Oslo Convention) phich is a reglonal instrunent. $r/ The Connission considered that' for the rDst part, the tuo Convenliona t'ere conpatible and that such minor differences as existed did notsjugtify any arnendrnent of the oslo convention. In considerlng the provisions ofartlcle 210 (5) of the Convention on the Latr of the Sea the Comnisaion pointed out that, the Conventi.on provides a legal fr aneiror k lrhich requires specific
analysis: This text appears to be discussing international agreements and treaties related to the Law of the Sea, coastal jurisdiction, and the prevention of marine pollution by dumping from ships and aircraft. The language used is formal and technical, suggesting a focus on international cooperation and the establishment of legal frameworks. The text does not appear to be directly related to economic development, agriculture, industry, transportation, or education, and it does not mention specific health, humanitarian, or cultural issues. The mention of the Oslo Convention and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea suggests a focus on environmental protection and international cooperation.