text: aside, as its only results have been the escalation of aggres- sion and of force, the institutionalization of apartheid and the massacre of the South African population, the prolon- gation of the illegal occupation of Namibia, the intensifica- tion of acts of aggression and the sowing of death and destruction among the Angolan population? 45. We welcome the unilateral measures that have been taken by a series of countries to increase pressure on South Africa, but we believe that this is not enough. We have had enough of mere reprimands and advice, enough of minor punishments for a party that is nothing but a blind and maddened monster, cornered today by the indomitable thrust of history and the struggle of peoples for freedom and justice. 46. It is necessary that the Council, doing honour to the fortieth anniversary of the United Nations, honour to its responsibilities under the Charter, honour to the solemn commitments expressed through its verbal declarations, now demand an immediate cessation of any direct or indi- rect intervention in the internal affairs of Angola and the other front-line States by South Africa and its powerful allies; condemn the illegal occupation of Namibia and demand the immediate and unconditional implementation of resolution 435 (1978); strongly condemn the policy of “constructive engagement” of the Government of the United States and demand that it be abandoned; unequivo- cally condemn South Africa and take immediate action in accordance with Chapter VII of the Charter in order to celebrate, together with the Movement of Non-Aligned Countries, the fortieth anniversary with its theme “United Nations for a better world”-in other words, a world which has completely eliminated the odious regime of apartheid. 47. We reiterate the need to give all due attention to the complaint of the fraternal people and Government of 
analysis: This text appears to be a resolution or statement from the United Nations, condemning the actions of South Africa and its allies in various African countries. The language used is strong and critical, with a focus on human rights and international law. The text mentions specific countries, including the United States, and references UN resolutions. Given the political and diplomatic tone, it is likely that the text is related to international relations, conflict, or human rights issues.