text: deny him correction of his ent ry level and requesting a change in his first appointment (entry on du ty 11 December 1983) from fixed-term to probationary. The Applicant's appointment was extended for a furthe r fixed-term period of one year effective 11 December 1987. In thi s letter of appointment was stated, for the first time, as a specia l condition, that the Applicant was seconded from the Government of the Arab Republic of Egypt. The Applicant asserts that "this was don e without consultation with, or the consent of the Applicant and at a time when the Applicant and the Respondent were in contention abou t secondment". In a cable dated 21 July 1988, the President of Tant a University informed the Applicant that his leave of absence from the University ended on 18 July 19 88 and that if he did not return to his job within the time-limits set forth by law, his employment with the University would be terminated as of 19 July 1988. The Applicant did not return to his post at the University. The Board adopted its report on 9 November 1988. Th e- 7 - conclusions and recommendation by the majority of the Board read a s follows: "Conclusions and recommendation 36.The majority of the Panel concludes that the appellant wa s on secondment from his government service at the time of hi s initial appointment and subsequent extensions thereof, an d remained on secondment until 19 July 1988 when his employment relationship with his government was severed. Accordingly, the majority concludes that the appellant's recruitment on a fixed-term rather than a probationary appointment wa s appropriate. 37.The majority of the Panel, however, feels that since the appellant's employment relationship with his government ha s terminated, he should be awarded a probationary appointment .
analysis: The text appears to be related to an employment dispute between an individual and an institution, specifically a university. The issue revolves around the terms of the individual's appointment, including the type of appointment (fixed-term or probationary) and the fact that the individual was seconded from their government service. The text does not mention any specific economic, environmental, or scientific aspects, but rather focuses on the administrative and legal aspects of the employment relationship.