text: abandoned a long time ago, since for reasons unrelated to jamming by Cuba, technical difficulties forced TV Marti off the air on 32 of the 84 days of operation. This means that, operating in nearly ideal weather and broadcasting condi tfons, around 50 per cent of the broadcasts were affected by serious B&ffiqulties. In the United States, for obvious reasons, the sponsors of the project, together with its promoters and their henchmen, have developed a vast campaign designed to mislead public opinion and even sectors of Congress ana parts of the / . . . S/21366 English Page 4 Administration, emphasizing the supposed success of the televised aggression against Cuba. The campaign was started by Dante Fascel and Connie Mack, legislators from Florida, who, several days after the transmissions were initiated, publicised the false rumour about the success of the United States operation throughout Cuba. The contra-revolutionary radio stations broadcasting from Miami against Cuba, Radio Marti and the circles related to the super-reactionary Fundacion National Cubano-Americana (National Cuban-American Foundation), supported this version. In order to strengthen the credibility of the lies which had been circulated, it was announced that a survey had been conducted in Miami among persons coming from Cuba and a similar inquiry was carried out by the Interests Section of the United States in Havana among persons visiting that office to apply for visas. Although such inquiries are useless and totally unrepresentative, they have been presented as elements of proof, Certainly, their obvious lack of serious intentions does not make them any the less useful for the purposes of the disinformation campaign. According to the audience survey of TV Marti conducted in Miami, more than 26 per cent of the homes in the three western provinces of Cuba receive the TV Marti signal for between five minutes and three hours every day. 
analysis: The text appears to be a critical analysis of a US-based television broadcasting project, TV Marti, and its supposed impact on Cuba. The text discusses the technical difficulties and misrepresentations surrounding the project, and highlights the efforts of US legislators and media outlets to promote a false narrative about its success. The text does not mention any specific economic, environmental, or social issues related to agriculture, forestry, fishing, industry, transport, communication, international trade, health, education, employment, humanitarian aid, or culture.