text: appeal to the JAB in the "second case". On 14 July 1982, the Applicant informed the United Nation s Joint Staff Pension Fund (UNJSPF) that he wished to either take, o r consider taking, a withdrawal settlement and requested details of the amount of such benefit. On 28 July 1982, the Secretary of the UNJSPF informed the Applicant the amount of his deferred retirement benefit and that his withdrawal settlement amounted to US$70,760. O n 5 August 1982, the Applicant informed t he UNJSPF that he had elected to take a withdrawal settlement. On 11 August 1982, the Secretary of the UNJSPF informed th e Applicant that, before any action could be taken by his office t o- 12 - effect payment, his office was required to receive documentation from the Office of Financial Services, indicating that he had separate d from service and reporting the corresponding pension contributions . On 15 October 1982, the Applicant wrote to the Secretary-Genera l demanding, inter alia, release of the appropriate forms to t he UNJSPF. Having received no reply, on 23 January 1983, the Applicant reiterated this request. In a letter dated 28 February 1983, the Controller advised the Applicant that as it had been established that he had "knowingl y falsified the signatures of recipients of cheques in an approximat e amount of US$200,000", no action was intended to be taken in connexion with any pension entitlements he might have until he paid back to the U.N. the misappropriated funds. In a reply dated 18 March 1983, the Applicant stated that it was "very irregular to withhold payment o f [his] pension and [he] demand[ ed] it". Similar requests were made by the Applicant on 22 June 1983 and 9 September 1983. On 28 September 1983, the Controller responded that the Organization was not in a
analysis: The text appears to be related to an individual's pension entitlements and benefits from the United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund (UNJSPF). The narrative revolves around the applicant's requests for information and payment of his pension, which is being withheld due to allegations of fraud. The language used is formal and bureaucratic, suggesting an institutional or administrative context.