text: belief that their adoption would more POSitiVdy SSSiSt the effective implementation of the various methods of sanc- tions already prescribed by the Security Council in Previous meetings. We would indeed have been happier if those propos& could have enjoyed the Committee’s Unanimus approval in order to accommodate more effectively the provisions incorporated in paragraph 4 of resolution 320 (1972). My delegation would like to stress the fore- going because it is now more important that we pursue a more effective implementation of the sanctions rather than endeavour to formulate numerous sanction methods whose implementation lack practicability. hl this connedon, permit me to remind the Council that one of the conclusions of the Security Council Special Mission to Zambia in its assessment of the conditions in the area Was that tile key to the solution of the problem dealt with in resolution 326 (1973) lies in the application Of, among others the strict implementation of the mandatory sane- tions igainst the aed regime of Southern Rhodesia. 1 feel 3 the need to refer to the Special Mission’s report2 to underscore the importance for stricter implementation of the mandatory sanctions because of “the flagrant and widespread violations of sanctions,” that are still being practiccd in certain quarters, as is clearly brought out in paragraph 21 of the Committee’s secgnd special report. 23. My delegation does not suppress the fact that it is not completely satisfied that the proposals submitted by the African members could not have been accommodated in their entirety. Nevertheless, WC are happy to note that there arc rccolnlnendations that have enjoyed unanimity of approval by the Committee. I do not need to take up the time of this Council to dwell on these recommendations at length. The representative of Guinea had already dealt with 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing a political and economic situation, specifically the implementation of sanctions against a certain country (Southern Rhodesia). The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting a discussion at the United Nations Security Council. The text mentions specific resolutions, missions, and reports, which further supports this analysis.