text: Singapore*, Somalia, Swaziland, Thailand*, Togo* and Turkey*. Chile*, Costa Rica*, Cote d'lvoire*, Gabon*, Honduras* and Japan subsequently joined the sponsors. 198. At the 29th meeting, on 19 February 1990, a statement relating to the draft resolution was made by the representative of Mexico. 199. The representative of Mexico requested a separate roll-call vote on the last preambular paragraph of draft resolution E/CN.4/1990/L.14. The last preambular paragraph was adopted by 28 votes to 1, with 11 abstentions. The voting was as follows; In favour; Argentina, Bangladesh, Belgium, Botswana, Canada, China, Colombia, Cyprus, France, Gambia, Germany, Federal Republic of, Ghana, Italy, Japan, Morocco, Pakistan, Panama, Philippines, Portugal, Senegal, Somalia, Spain, Swaziland, Sweden, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United States of America, Venezuela, Yugoslavia. Against; Cuba. Abstaining; Brazil, Bulgaria, Ethiopia, Hungary, India, Iraq, Madagascar, Mexico, Nigeria, Peru, Sri Lanka. The representative of Sao Tome and Principe, the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics stated that their delegations were not participating in the vote. 200. A statement in explanation of vote before the vote on the draft resolution as a whole was made by the representative of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. -206-201. The representatives of Mexico and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics requested a roll-call vote on draft resolution E/CN.4/1990/L.14 as a whole. The draft resolution was adopted by 31 votes to 5, with 6 abstentions. The voting was as follows: In favour; Argentina, Bangladesh, Botswana, Brazil, China, Colombia, Cyprus, France, Gambia, Germany, Federal Republic of, Ghana, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Morocco, Nigeria, Pakistan, Panama, Peru, Philippines, Portugal, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, Somalia, Spain, Sri Lanka, Swaziland, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United States of America, Venezuela, Yugoslavia. Against: Cuba, Ethiopia, India, Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
analysis: The text appears to be a record of a United Nations meeting discussing a draft resolution, with votes and statements from various countries. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting that the topic is likely a matter of international politics or human rights. However, there is no explicit mention of economic development, natural resources, or industry, which are common areas of focus in international organizations.