text: (3) (4) (5) k) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (125 (13) 13.4 14.5 2.3 6.3 7.2 2.8 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 6.9 6.7 0.2 0.9 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 22.9 2.0 2.2 0.2 0.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.4 22.2 23.4 2.8 8.0 7.5 3.0 0.3 0.1 0.4 0.1 100.0 93. !Lhe data received maP also be assembled in such a we.y as to show the percentage distribution of each cost categoty over the varioua force groups. This is shown in table 7. The same thing may also be shown for each force group according to the variou coet categories. lhis is shown in table 8. Table 7. Distribution of military exnenditures according to cost categories and force groups (Percentage of rov totals) Reaonrce costa (3) 1. Operating coets 2. Procurement and conetruction 19.3 Other Central support Paramil- Air combat administration itarg forces forces and command forces support Command (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) .20.9 3.4 9.0 10.3 4.1 3 8.1 1. 23.1 30.0 29.5 1.1 3.9 1.2 0.8 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.0 100.0 1. Research and development 12.5 15.6 26.5 29.4 2.3 12.0 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100,o ‘. Total 3.5 27.0 22.2 23.4 2.8 8.0 7.5 3.0 0.3 0.1 0.4 0.1 100.0 4 Stra- tegio Land l- forces forces Naval forces I . . . Force groups 7 Resource costs \ 1. Operating coats 2. ~oeurement ana construction 3. Rcsearch ana dcvelopment 4. Tbtal Stra- tegic forcea 52.5 26.1 -3o- Table 8. Distribution of military expendituree according to cost categories and forte groups (Per iiiqzqL lorces forces forces !entage of column totals) Other Central support Paramil combat adninistration itarv forces and command I fOl&3 i3uppm-t 1 Command (5) (6) (7) (8) 84.9 78.0 94.7 93.7 .8.9 11.0 3;6 6.3 6.2 11.0 0.9 0.0 
analysis: The text appears to be related to military expenditures, with categories such as "Operating costs", "Procurement and construction", "Research and development", and "Central support" mentioned. The data is also divided by "force groups", suggesting that it is related to the military forces of a country. This leads me to hypothesize that the text is related to the military budget and expenditure.