text: this debate on South Africa’s aggression against the Peo- ple’s Republic of Angola, I received news this morning to the effect that another State in the region is under attack by South Africa. I am told that about 10 o’clock last night, bazookas were fired into Lesotho from South African ter- ritory by people identified as soldiers by their military uni- forms. What has Lesotho done to warrant such aggression? Is it not more than enough that this small peace-loving country is not only land-locked but also finds itself in the geographical position of having to shape a destiny in the belly of vicious tyranny? 75. In the final analysis, apartheid is far beyond redemp- tion. Its evil genius belongs to an antedeluvian era and must soon face the flood of black nationalism and the consuming fury of its frustrated aspirations. The end is near. The question is no longer when apartheid and racial tyranny will end in South Africa, but how. To date, all signs point to a ghastly demise for that evil system, for the system can be neither reformed nor improved. There is no such thing as reformed or improved evil. Only from the ashes of apartheid and racial tyranny can the people of South Africa-al1 of them, regardless of race, colour or creed-build a new South Africa and fulfil their calling in peace, freedom and justice. 76. The PRESIDENT: The next speaker is the represen- tative of Tunisia. I invite him to take a place at the Council table and to make his statement. 77. Mr. BOUZIRI (Tunisia) (interpretationf Bench): First of all, Sir, allow me to congratulate you on your assumption of the presidency of the Security Council and to wish you every success. You have demonstrated remar- kable authority and great wisdom in your guidance of the 
analysis: This text appears to be a speech or statement on a political issue, specifically the aggression of South Africa against the People's Republic of Angola and Lesotho. The speaker is condemning apartheid and racial tyranny in South Africa, and advocating for the end of the system. The text does not mention economic development, natural resources, agriculture, industry, transport, communication, international trade, health, education, employment, humanitarian aid, or culture. It is primarily focused on politics and human rights.