text: (d) In operative paragraph 8, the word "current" was inserted between the words "process of" and the words "the Chairman". 178. At the 28th meeting, on 16 February 1990, the revised draft resolution (E/CN.4/1990/L.9/Rev.l) was adopted without a vote. 179. For the text as adopted, see chapter II, section A, resolution 1990/4. 180. At the same meeting, the representative of India introduced draft resolution E/CN.4/1990/L.5, sponsored by Algeria*, Bangladesh, Bahrain*, China, Cuba, Democratic Yemen*, Egypt*, Gambia, Ghana, India, Iraq, Jordan*, Kuwait*, the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya*, Madagascar, Mauritania*, Morocco, Nigeria, Oman*, Pakistan, Qatar*, Saudi Arabia*, Senegal, Somalia, Sudan*, the Syrian Arab Republic*, Tunisia*, the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, the United Arab Emirates* and Yemen*. Afghanistan*, Angola* and Nicaragua* subsequently joined the sponsors. -203-181. At the 29th meeting, on 19 February 1990, the representative of Canada requested a separate roll-call vote on operative paragraph 1 of draft resolution E/CN.4/1990/L.5. Operative paragraph 1 was adopted by 30 votes to 7, with 5 abstentions. The voting was as follows: In favour: Argentina, Bangladesh, Botswana, Brazil, China, Colombia, Cuba, Cyprus, Ethiopia, Gambia, Hungary, India, Iraq, Madagascar, Mexico, Morocco, Nigeria, Pakistan, Panama, Peru, Philippines, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, Somalia, Sri Lanka, Swaziland, Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, Venezuela, Yugoslavia. Against: Belgium, Canada, Germany, Federal Republic of, Italy, Sweden, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United States of America. Abstaining: Bulgaria, France, Japan, Portugal, Spain. 182. At the request of the representative of United States of America, a vote was taken on draft resolution E/CN.4/1990/L.5 as a whole. The draft resolution was adopted by 30 votes to 1, with 10 abstentions. 183. The representative of Ghana subsequently indicated that, had he been present, he would have voted in favour. 184. A statement in explanation of vote after the vote was made by the
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the adoption of a draft resolution by the United Nations Commission on Human Rights. The resolution is not explicitly stated to be related to a specific sector or issue, but it is likely related to human rights or international relations. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting that it may be a resolution related to international governance or policy.