text: principl dignity 3.It regimeh internal pursuit ominous acquisitO nuclear bytrans 4.In tointer inthea 1979at (A/CN.IO Collabora 5.In establish General com for tech tor 6.The racistre andblack thereforeAnnexIII CONCLUSIONS ANDRECOMMENDATIONS ONAGENDA ITEM6 (A/CN.10/1984/WG.II/CRP.1) 1.Against thebackground ofthepurposes andprinciples enshrined intheCharter oftheUnitedNations, inparticular thesovereign rightofallpeoples to self-determination andindependence, theestablishment andperpetuation ofaracist minority regimeinSouthAfricaandNamibia overthemajority ofthepopulation represent notonlyaviolation oftherelevant principles ofinternational lawbut alsocriminal conduct. 2.SouthAfrica's adoption ofapar'theid, aninstitutionalized formofracial discrimination, asaninstrument ofpolicyrunscounter tothehumanrights provisions oftheCharter oftheUnitedNations concerning thehumanrightsand rightofallpeoples toself-determination. Asaresult, SouthAfrica's policyof apartheid hasbeenandremains condemned asinhumane andcontrary tobasichuman principle bytheinternational community andacrimeagainst theconscience and dignity ofmankind bytheSecurity Council. 3.Ithasbecomeclearthat,initsisolation anddesperation, thePretoria regimehasresorted tothepursuit ofamilitary optionasaninstrument of internal oppression andexternal aggression. Itmustbesuspected thatinthe pursuit ofitsmilitary capability inthedirection ofincreased sophistication and ominous dimensions SouthAfricahasplacedemphasis onthedevelopment and acquisition ofnuclear weaponry, whichhasbeenmadepossible through theactive nuclear collaboration withitbycertain Western countries andIsrael, aswellas bytransnational corporations. 4.Intheevent,theissueofSouthAfrica's nuclear capability hasbeenbrought tointernational attention byresolution 34/76Bof11December 1979andincluded intheagendaoftheDisarmament Commission sinceitsfirstsubstantive session in 1979attheinstance oftheChairman oftheSpecial Committee against Apartheid (A/CN.10/4) following theconclusion oftheUnitedNations Seminar onNuclear Collaboration withSouthAfrica, heldatLondoninFebruary 1979. ~/ 5.Inconsideration oftheitem,theCommission affirms theconviction already established byconsensus intheFinalDocument oftheTenthSpecial Session ofthe General Assembly that "themassive accumulation ofarmaments andtheacquisition ofarmaments technology byracistregimes, aswellastheirpossible acquisition ofnuclear weapons, present achallenging andincreasingly dangerous obstacle toaworld community facedwiththeurgent needtodisarm. Itis,therefore, essential forpurposes ofdisarmament toprevent anyfurther acquisition ofarmsorarms technology bysuchregimes, especially throughstrictadherence byallStates torelevant decisions oftheSecurity Council" (resolution S-10/2, para.12). 6.TheCommission isofthefirmviewthatnuclear weapons inthepossession of racistregimes canbecomeaninstrument ofpolicyforStateterrorism, aggression andblackmail andthusincrease thedangertointernational peaceandsecurity. It therefore noteswithgraveconcern thedanger andserious threatwhichthe -35-established technical capability ofSouthAfricatoproduce nuclear weapons andthe necessary meansofdelivery posetothesecurity ofAfrican Statesaswellasto international peaceandsecurity. Thisconcern isfurther increased bythe r''!i::\()rted development bySouthAfricaofacruisemissile, aneutron bomband various delivery systems incollaboration withIsrael. 7.TheCommission notesthatthediscovery ofareported nuclear-weapon-test site intheKalahari Desertin1977,the22September 1979eventintheSouthAtlantic inparticular andotherdata,including thereportoftheSecretary-General on SouthAfrica's planandcapability inthenuclear field(A/35/402 andCorr.l), have causedlegitimate andparticular concern totheAfrican Statesandthe international community ingeneral, themoresosincethisnuclear capability may beputattheservice oftheabhorrent policyofapartheid.
analysis: The text appears to be a diplomatic document discussing the issue of South Africa's nuclear capability and its implications on international peace and security. It seems to be more focused on the political and international relations aspects rather than economic or social issues. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting that it may be a report or resolution from the United Nations.