text: E/CN.4/1990/L.86. At the request of the representative of Peru, the vote was taken by roll-call. The draft resolution was adopted by 41 votes to none, with 2 abstentions. The voting was as follows: In favour; Argentina, Bangladesh, Belgium, Botswana, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Colombia, Cyprus, Ethiopia, France, Gambia, Germany, Federal Republic of, Ghana, Hungary, India, Iraq, Italy, Japan, Madagascar, Mexico, Morocco, Nigeria, Pakistan, Panama, Peru, Philippines, Portugal, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, Somalia, Spain, Sri Lanka, Swaziland, Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United States of America, Venezuela, Yugoslavia. Against; None. Abstaining; Cuba, Sweden. 325. Statements in explanation of vote after the vote were made by the representatives of Mexico and Sweden. 326. For the text as adopted, see chapter II, section A, resolution 1990/75. 327. At the same meeting, the representative of Hungary introduced draft resolution E/CN.4/1990/L.87, sponsored by Austria*, Gambia, Hungary, Swaziland, Sweden, Switzerland* and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Czechoslovakia* subsequently joined the sponsors. 328. The draft resolution was adopted without a vote. 329. For the text as adopted, see chapter II, section A, resolution 1990/76. 330. At the same meeting, the representative of Morocco introduced draft decision E/CN.4/1990/L.89, sponsored by Greece*, Ireland* and Morocco. 331. The draft decision was adopted without a vote. -227-332. For the text as adopted, see chapter II, section B, decision 1990/110. 333. At the same meeting, the Commission considered draft resolution I recommended by the Sub-Commission for adoption by the Commission (E/CN.4/1990/2, chap. I, sect. A). 334. The representative of Belgium proposed that consideration of draft resolution I, recommended by the Sub-Commission, be postponed to the forty-seventh session of the Commission. The proposal was seconded by the representative of the Philippines. 335. The proposal was adopted without a vote.
analysis: The text appears to be a report from the United Nations Commission on Human Rights, discussing the adoption of various resolutions and decisions. The language used is formal and official, suggesting a focus on human rights and international relations. The text does not mention specific economic or environmental issues, but rather procedural matters and the adoption of resolutions.