text: xection 1655 (a) 2 of the Foreign Sovereign famunities Act. The legislative history of the Act made that point clear; contracts of employment were not entioned, sinply because the entire approach was different from that taken in the draft. 185- lhere was general support for deleting the reference to the social security requirement in paragraph 1. One member, however, considered that the reference should be retained, as difficulties often arose in that connection. In his view, the words "which may be in force" made it clear that States that did not have a social security system would not on that account be required to introduce one. As regards paragraph 2, subparagraph (al, the opinion of meml.n?rs was divided: some members supported the Special Rapporteur's - 80 -altornativo taxt whfah was more limited in saope, whereas other membarc profetrred aithor the deletion of subperRgraph (a) or the general lernguags of the toxt adopted on firet reading. 1111, Viawa WOW also diviclad on paragrtrph 2, Nubparagraph (b). Somememba r a, supporting the view expressed by the Special Aapporteur, suggested the deletion of the worcl “recru.itment” or the deletion of the ontiro provision. One msmber conofdered that the provieion might not be necosalrxy in the light of? draft article 26 concerning State immunity from me8fduref3 of coercion, since the lattor article would provide that a State could not be forcot! by a court of tho Stoto of tho forum to employ, or to rotafn in ito employment, or to ro-employ, R p8r:ticular individlual. Some othor members, however, insisted on the retention of subparagraph (b), including the word “recruitment” which, it WBB maintained, was coneistent with tho establiohecl ruleo of international law. Recruitment, according to one member, could not be challenged in court, far the State’s fraadorn to docido whethor or not to hire or to renew
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, specifically the section regarding contracts of employment. The language used is technical and legal, with references to international law and state immunity. The discussion focuses on the wording and implications of certain provisions, such as recruitment and social security requirements. This suggests that the text is related to the legal framework governing international employment, rather than a specific industry or sector.