text: the invading Paver to implement Security Council reooiution 660 (1990) and that the Sraqi trmps would unconditionally and immediately withdraw. However, the invading Power’s premeditated aim of 1te aggression was the overthrow of the legitimate Government of the State of Kuwait. We are supported not only by the citizens and residente of Kuwait but also by the whole world. Iraq’s aim is to install a new Governmen;: in Kuwait. The aqyreeea was not able to announce the installation of Jw4 s/w. 2933 7 (MC. Abulhasan, Kuwait) that Praqi Gavemment until several days after the invasion, which refl%oW the total failure of the occupying troops, despite their oppreesion of Kuwait1 dti55tw. No one has agreed tr, co-operate with the usurper and aggreosor. The aim of this invasion can aleo be seen in hegerP;wry over Kuwait’s reaoutces, their domination, plunder and looting. The ob jectivee of the invasion are baaed On exparmionisa, a5 seen in Xraq’s threats and consequent attack5 against neighbouring countries folluwing ih, threat8 and it5 blackmail. Iraq ia thm threatening the 5tJZategic interests of all the oountries of the world, of which the Gulf region ia one of the m5t vital regions. All thoee objective5 in their totality actually threaten intacnationel Peace and security. It ie a 5oucc5 of agony that the invasion and overall planr5d aggression 8houl.d have lad to diverting attention from so avmy decisive iesue5 mcerning people8 that continwi to suffer. Relying on the aforemntioned principles, the invadiuq Pamar doe5 not want to iapledtent Security Council resolution 669 (1990), deepite it5 etatement that it intended to begin withdrawing its troops. That statement was conditional in form an4 fn8incere in content. St flout5 the operative paragraphs of Security Council resolution 660 (19901. I muld like here to aonfitm a fact that has becoma apparent to all, no 
analysis: The text appears to be a political statement or document related to a specific conflict, likely the Gulf War. It mentions the invasion of Kuwait, the Security Council, and the actions of various countries. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting a high-level government or international organization document. The content focuses on the political and strategic aspects of the conflict, with little mention of economic, social, or cultural issues.