text: phrase could unduly reetrict the inviolability of international organisations. He also thought that article 8 should make it clear that no agent of the hoet SLate could enter the premises of an international organisation without the organieation's consent, Another member thought that the word “premises@* called for greater precision in order to make its scope perfectly clear. 454. One member expressed doubts that an organisation’s premises had the same degree of functional necessity calling for inviolability as was the case with the premises of a State’s embassy or mission. 455. Some members expressly supported the inviolability of the premises of the organfaation and the immunity of its property, funds and assets from expropriation, as proposed in article 8, paragraph 1. Othor members questioned whether such immunity was in keeping with international law at the present time. In that connection, the Special Rapporteur pointed out that it was generally agreed that the property of international organieations could not be expropriated by the host country on the grounde of public interest., That would, among other things, place the host State in an inadmissible position of superiority in relation to the organisation’s member States, In many legal systems, the rdgime governing the immovable property of international organisations was modelled on the regime applicable to property in the public domain, which was regarded as inalienable under internal law. 456. With reference to article 9, M/ eeverel members generally supported the content and the underlying principle. They pointed out that the 2.921 Article 9, as proposed by the Special Rapporteur, read as follows, Without prejudice to the provisions of the preeent draft articles (Convent ion), international organisations shall not allow their headquarters to serve as a rofuge for persons trying to evade arrest under the legal provisions of the host country, or sought by the
analysis: The text appears to be discussing international law and the relationships between international organizations and host states. It touches on topics such as the inviolability of international organizations' premises, immunity of property and assets, and the use of headquarters as a refuge for individuals trying to evade arrest. These topics suggest that the text is related to international relations, diplomacy, and governance, rather than any specific sector or industry.