text: committed by a third State in the region. With all due respect for the Council and for the Stakes aat ate sponsoring the draft re8olution, I cannot Sail to stress om fact that ia knom to everyone% This &aft resolution was prepared by a sinqle State. l?reesure was exerted on all the other State3 ix3 go along with this. That makes the draSt resolution null and void, because anything imploed by Sorce and threat is not legitimate under the principles of the Charter. We had hoped that after the end of the cold war ~3 would see a new climate in international relations, a climate marked by a greater role played by the United Watb~ au& the 5ecurity Councki with regard to the maintenance of peace and security in the wcxld. However, we regret to note a super-Bawer trying to use the United Nations and the Security Council in order to achieve its objoctivse - ac, 1E NS/pt §/PV. 29 33 13-15 (Mr. Al-Anbar i , S r aq) the Security Council were aiarply it5 Foreign Ministry. All this arises from the fact that that State QWBP the United Nations $675 million and it ia using this aa a meana of exerting pressure QI the United Nations. This already happened in 1975 when Genaral A~senibly retlolution 3379 (XXX) was adopted. Apdxt frem the illegality of this draft resolution and because of ieS contents and the way in which it was submitted, we believe that it constitutes regression, a negative trend for the developing countries fn vim of its influence QI the price of oil exporta& to the developing countties. In otha worde, $his draft resoluticm will have a negative impact cm the econonic affairs of the developing countries. That ia why I expect the Security council to annul it. 
analysis: The text appears to be a speech or statement from a representative of a country, likely from the Middle East or a developing country, criticizing a draft resolution submitted to the United Nations Security Council. The speaker is concerned about the resolution's legitimacy, as they believe it was prepared by a single state and was pushed through with pressure and coercion. The resolution is likely related to the oil industry, as the speaker mentions the price of oil exports to developing countries. The tone is critical and advocating for the annulment of the resolution.