text: 46. It is understood thet UNAT Judgenents result in payments to 6taff mernberaa6 ai.ards of compensatlon by the Organtzatlon. And ln thi6 caa€ the GenerelAssembly hes 6leo set the Ilnlt6 wlthln whtch these awards may be paid {lthoutbelng reviewed by ttself. In 1954, 1t establiehed a Speclal Indeonlty Fundof us$ 250'000 whlch 1t contlnuea to replenrsh. since then rhere haa not beene 6lngle occasl.on for revlenlng UNAT Judgenents, because they never hed flnancialirDpllcations of rnore than US$ 250,000. But 1f 'NAT entertalned ao appealconcerning suspenelon of the aecond part of the post adjustment tndei forNev York and pessed a Judgenent fevourable to staff,.rnb".u, then the srf,ards ofcoopenaatlon nlght reech mllIIonB of US dollsre per year systen_idlde. TheInapectors have no doubt that under theee clrcunEtaniee the General Assenblvha€ to reviehr thls judgerneot and take 1te own declslons. Otheri.lse, it woifamean that not the Ceneral A6eemb1y, o! Member Stetea, had eontrol overflnanclal resourcea of th€ Organlzation, but UNAT, lt9 substdlary body. 49.. There is a elde-spresd contentLon th6t UNAT Judgemente "ar€ flnel andtrlthout sppealrt and that fo! tht€ partlcular ,"""on thu General Assernbly hesno ltght to revler them but only to pay the anount of noney due. fn tleInapectorgt oplnlon, lt needs to be clartfled, 59. First of all, UNAT Judgements are not ,,ftnal . They are fieubject tothe provlslon6 of Artlclee 11. and 12" of ite stgtute. They can aleo be appealedto the International Court of Justlce. But the most lmportant aepect of therratter i3 the lntentlon of the Ceneral Aeeembly tn e8tabit€hing UNAT. Inttl" .ontt" lttee on 15 November 1946should. be recalled. The Representatlve of BelSium ssked the lepporteur of theAdvlsory conmlttee 'rwhether the decl.sioos of the edmlnlstretive Trlbunal !rou1dbe final or ldhether .they would be subject to a reylsion by the ceneral Aesenbly'r.lhe answer i'es rrThat eccording to the draft Statute, as prepared by the AdvisoryCommittee, there could be no appeal from the Adrninlstratlve Tribunal. TheAdvlsory Committee feared an adverge effect on the morale of the staff if aDDealbeyond the Adnintstrarive Trtbunal delayed the final declsion i". ".". "tiii had already been heard before organs vtthin the secretariat created for thatpurpose.r!26/ 261 Alc-5lsR.25, p. 114. 51.-15-
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the financial implications and procedures of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal (UNAT) and its judgments, which result in payments to staff members. The tone suggests a focus on organizational structure, decision-making, and budgetary concerns. This suggests that the text may be related to the governance and management of an international organization, rather than a specific field like economic development or health.