text: l quipmrnt component of project8 1 and 3 and hae indicated a willinqnese to eupport the twhnical arrirtance component. Thir rhould permit the project8 to get under way although the funding provided tall0 mhort of that requested. Norway (NORAD) bar agreed to tund retorertation project 2. The United State8 hae indicated that it ir frvourably coneiderinq project 4. No progreeta ha8 been made in eecurinq financing tor project 5, Thir project am revieed ie included in the rwommendationr of the mirrion (eee para. 81). VI. RECOMMENDATIONS MD CONCLUSIONS A. Recommendation8 1. Damaper 75. The unprovoked and unwarranted military attack on the capital of Botewana, Gaborone, by South Africa on 14 June 1985, resulted in the death of 12 people and injury to 7 othersj coneiderable damaqe and destruction were caused to property. Thi@ development hao raised concerns about the eecurity of the country with oonreaurnt implication8 for it8 economic development and conetituted a clear violation of the pereon of the Republic of Botswana. The miesion, in coneultation with the Government of Botewana, haa preeented an aeseeement of the meaeureable drmaqer. Security Council reeolution 568 (1985) demands full and adequate / . . . s/17453 Enqlirh Paqe 23 compeneation by the Government of South Africa for there damaqee. The Government of Botewana by official communication to the Government of South Africa har demanded “the payment of reparations in respect of the deceased and injured persona, the propertiee destroyed and all other damages reeultinq from thir act of aqqreeaion”. The Government of South Africa hae not reeponded officially to that demand. The Government of Botewana hopea that, with the information now at it8 disposal, the Security Council will take the neceeeary action to obtain redrena from South Africa for the damaqee. 2. Safety 
analysis: The text appears to be a report or document related to international politics and conflict, specifically referencing a military attack and subsequent demands for reparations. The language used is formal and official, suggesting a government or institutional context. The themes of security, damage, and compensation are central to the text, indicating a focus on conflict resolution and international relations.