text: peace, the Soviet Government calls on the Security Coun- cil to take against the aggressor the effective measures pro- vided for in the Charter of the United Nations.” [see S/I 7491, annex.] 81. Mr. ALZAMORA (Peru) (interpretation from Span- ish): Once again, the People’s Republic of Angola has been subjected to violence at the hands of South Africa, a tragedy that has recurred all too often in the history of the young Angolan nation, despite the provisions of the Char- ter and repeated resolutions by the Security Council. 82. The statement by the representative of Angola [2612th meeting] shows that we are not dealing with iso- lated facts but with the repetition of acts that reveal a blind determination to impose solutions of force by violating the sovereignty and integrity of other States and carrying out colonialist and racist practices. These are all flagrant viola- tions of the values and principles that form the moral and legal basis of the Organization and that the Security Coun- cil thus has an inescapable obligation to protect. 83. The resolution to be adopted by the Council con- demning this policy will be important, but it will be more so if the Council finally decides to assume a qualitatively differ- ent position and make effective and appropriate use of all the measures of recourse available to it under the Charter. 84. We believe that the time has come to go beyond the usual rhetoric and inhibitions. Peru is prepared to meet this moral and political responsibility. 85. Mr. de KfiMOULARIA (France) (interpretation from French): My delegation is shocked that once again a southern African State should be the victim of an invasion by South African armed forces. The position of my coun- try on acts of this kind is clear and well known. France most vigourously condemns these unjustifiable armed attacks carried out in violation of international law. 
analysis: The text appears to be a statement made by representatives of Peru and France in a United Nations Security Council meeting, condemning the actions of South Africa against Angola. The discussion revolves around the violation of international law, sovereignty, and human rights, which suggests that the category should be related to international relations, law, and governance.