text: complete it as soon as possible. 1982/30, Conscientious objection to military service ,102/ The Sub~Coramissic:i on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities, Recjyj^ing resolution 38 (XXXVI) of the Commission on Human Rights and especially its resolution 40 (XXXVII) which requested the Sub-Commission to study the question cf conscientious objection to military service, Bearing in mind General Assembly resolution 33/l65 of 20 December 1978 which recognized, the right of all persons to refuse service in military or police forces used to enforce apart? ,ei.d< Recallin£ 3ub~Comission resolution 14 (XXXIV) in which it recognized the importance of the question of consciertious objection as a human right and the interrelationship of this question with the promotion and protection of other lr>"~ian rights. Recalling that resolution 14 (XXXIV) also expressed the desire that two members cf the Sub-Commission; Mr. Asbj^rn Eide and Mr. Chama Mubanga-Chipoya, study the natter and prepare a, concise report to be presented at the thirty-fifth session of the Sub~Commissis."ij .^^XiSS. received an excellent preliminary report JLOl/ by the two experts which vas prepared in accordance with the request of the Commission and the Sub-Commission, Recognizing the great importance of the subject and the need to promote and protect the human rights of conscientious objectors, Believing that special attention should be given to appropriate avenues of recourse at the national, regional; and international levels in order to advance L'.is promotion and protection of the human rights of conscientious objectors, Recalling articles 3 and 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which •oroc]aims the right cf everyone to life, liberty and the security of persons and the right to freedom of thought; conscience and religion, TToting the great potential of destruction and oppression attendant on modern nilitary conflict, 100/ Adopted at the 36th meeting, on 10 September 1982, by 9 votes to 4, with
analysis: This text appears to be a document related to human rights, specifically focusing on the right of conscientious objection to military service. It references various international resolutions and declarations, highlighting the importance of promoting and protecting the human rights of those who refuse to serve in military or police forces. The text also touches on the potential for destruction and oppression in modern military conflicts, suggesting that the issue is of great significance. Given these themes and concerns, it seems likely that the text falls under the category of human rights.