text: to adopt the proposal, the invitation would canter on PLO the same riqhts ot participation as those conterred on Member States invited pursuant to rule 37. Pollnwinq discussion, the Security Council adopted the proposal hy 10 votes to 1 (the United Statrs of America), with 4 ahstentions (Australia, Denmark, France and the United Kinqdom ot Great Britain anLI Northern Ireland). In accordance with the reauest dated 12 Srp -Wet- 19M5 trom the Permanent Representative ot Qatar to the United Nations (S/l,-, ,I), In his capacity as Chairman ot the Arab Croup, the Council extended an invitatlnn under rule 39 ot its provisional rules ot ptncedure to Mt. Clovis Maksouri. / . . . S/16880/Add.36 Enqlish Paqe 3 In response to a request dated 12 September 1985 trom the Chairman ot the Committee on the Exercise ot the lnalisnahle Riqt,ts ot the Palestinian People, the President, with the consent ot the Council, extended an ipvltatlon under rule 39 ot the Counc11’s prnvisional rules ot procedure to the Chairman ot that Committee. At the Council’s 2605th meetinq, on 13 September 1985, the President called attention to a dratt resolution (S/17459) submitted by Llurkina Faso, Eqypt, India, Madaqa scar, Peru and Trinidad and Tobqo, which read as tollows: The Security COunCi 1, -. Recall& its resolutions 468 (19801, 469 (1980) and 484 (19801, Takinq note or’ General Assembly resolution 35/122 ot 11 December 1980, Having heard the statement ot the Permanent Representative of Qatar and other statements made befare the Council, Stressing the urqent need to achieve a comprehensive, yust and 1aStinq peace in the Middle East, Attlrminq once aqain that the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection ot Civilian Persons in Tlrne of War, ot 12 Auquet 1949, ifi applicable to the Arab territories occupied by Israel since 1967, includinq Jerusalem, 1. Deplores the repressive measucefi taken by Israel since 4 Auqust 1985 
analysis: This text appears to be a record of a meeting of the United Nations Security Council, discussing a resolution related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The text mentions specific dates, countries, and international resolutions, indicating a focus on international relations and politics. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting a serious and formal discussion. Given the context and language, it is likely that the text falls under a category related to international relations and politics.