text: the onset of the war, become a military procedure followed by the Iranian forces intensively and indis­ criminately on an almost daily basis. Unquestionably, it is the highest degree of hypocrisy for the letter under consideration to assert that Iraq has no interest in peace, because it is a well-known and indisputable fact that Iraq has supported and still sup­ ports all peaceful efforts to end the war and that it has striven sincerely and with all its power, inside and outside the United Nations, to arrive at a just and honourable settlement between the two countries. It is no longer a secret to anyone that the Iranian regime is the party responsible for the failure of those efforts and that it stands alone against the will of the international community, which supports the establishment of peace. Iraq is fully aware that the international community is not deceived regarding the facts and, in particular, regarding the method of chronic duplicity which the Iranian regime customarily employs, as it did iii its above-mentioned letter, in which it describes General Assembly resolution 37 /3 of 22 October 1982 as a res­ olution imposed by Iraq without respect for the sover­ eignty of the 119 States which voted in favour of its adoption of their own free will, with one opposing vote, namely, that of the Iranian regime. This is but one further proof of the Iranian regime's lack of re­ spect for the will of the international community as represented by the United Nations General Assembly. On this occasion, I annex hereto a detailed list of the acts of armed aggression which the Iranian regime persisted in perpetrati.ig during the period from 1 Oc­ tober to 15 November 1982 and the declared purpose of which was to occupy Iraq and change the regime there. 
analysis: This text appears to be a diplomatic document or a statement from a government official, discussing the situation during a war between Iraq and Iran. The language used is formal and critical, suggesting a high level of tension and conflict. The text does not mention any specific economic, social, or environmental issues, but rather focuses on the political and military aspects of the conflict.