text: sponsored by that country. 566. The draft decision was adopted without a vote. 567. For the text as adopted, see chapter II, section B, decision 1990/107. 568. At the same meeting, the representative of Canada introduced draft resolution E/CN.4/1990/L.70, sponsored by Afghanistan*, Australia*, Canada, China, Colombia, Cuba, Cyprus, Denmark*, Gambia, the German Democratic Republic*, the Netherlands*, New Zealand*, Norway*, Peru, the Philippines, Senegal, Sweden and Zaire*. 569. The representative of Canada orally revised operative paragraph 5 by inserting the words: "ten serviced meetings in the" between the words "meet for" and the words "10 working days". 570. The attention of the Commission was drawn to the administrative and programme budget implications (E/CN.4/1990/L.104/Rev.1) 1/ of draft resolution E/CN.4/1990/L.70. 571. Statements relating to the draft resolution were made by the representatives of Colombia Mexico, Nigeria and the Philippines. 572. The draft resolution, as orally revised, was adopted without a vote. 573. For the text as adopted, see chapter II, section A, resolution 1990/62. 574. In view of the adoption of draft resolution E/CN.4/1990/L.70 (see paras. 570-574), the Commission decided to take no action on draft resolution X and draft decision 3, recommended by the Sub-Commission (E/CN.4/1990/2, chap. I, sects. A and B) for adoption by the Commission. -272-575. At the same meeting the representative of the Netherlands introduced draft resolution E/CN.4/1990/L.71, sponsored by Belgium, Colombia, Costa Rica*, France, Gambia, Nicaragua*, the Philippines, Portugal, the Netherlands* and Zaire*. 576. The draft resolution was adopted without a vote. 577. For the text as adopted, see chapter II, section A, resolution 1990/63. 578. At the same meeting, the representative of Belgium introduced draft decision E/CN.4/1990/L.83 sponsored by Austria* and Belgium. 579. The draft decision was adopted without a vote. 580. For the text as adopted, see chapter II, section B, decision 1990/108.
analysis: The text appears to be discussing resolutions and decisions made by the United Nations Commission on Human Rights, which suggests that the topics relate to human rights and international relations. The resolutions and decisions are sponsored by various countries, and they do not seem to be related to specific sectors like economic development, industry, or agriculture. The focus is on international cooperation and human rights issues.