text: the consequence and not the cause of hostility, and there is in fact a need to take advantage of the opportunities afforded by the political climate to strengthen and stabilize it, by drawing up disarmament agreements. It is not important whether such agreements are the result of bilateral consultations or multilateral negotiations, even if it must be recognized that the solution of problems outside Europe should be the result of negotiations involving all the regions or all the countries concerned. We cannot concentrate on Europe alone, where a new form of security is taking shape, provided, as I have already had occasion to say, that we move forward prudently and with realism. Fortunately, the improvement in relations between the two super-Powers also contains potential for the solution of regional problems outside Europe. It would be illogical and sad to see a new European architecture based on new ideas of security and respect for universal values contrasting with an increase in the danger of an outbreak of conflict in other countries of the world. On several occasions Belgian delegations in New York or here in Geneva have expressed their apprehension at the growing number of countries acquiring ballistic missiles or the technology to produce them or to increase their range, in particular if this phenomenon goes hand in hand with nuclear or chemical capabilities. The proliferation of ballistic missiles in several areas of tension is creating a new security problem, not so much in a global context as in relations between neighbouring countries which often are or consider themselves to be developing countries. It should not be forgotten that among those countries which possess missiles, several have the means to develop chemical or even biological weapons, and some even have the technology 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing international relations, disarmament, and global security, highlighting the importance of regional negotiations and agreements to prevent the proliferation of ballistic missiles and weapons of mass destruction. The tone is diplomatic and focused on preventing conflicts, suggesting that the topic is not related to economic or social development, but rather to international cooperation and security.