text: 28. Mr. OKEYO (Kenya) said that the question of Namibia was of vital importance to his delegation, which thought that everything must be done to ensure the Territory's attainment of independence, even if that entailed making exceptions to certain General Assembly resolutions. The council for Namibia was a very special organ of the United Nations in that it was responsible for administering the Territory, of which it constituted the de jure Government. It was its duty to make proposals and undertake programmes aimed at ensuring the independence of Namibia and, unlike those who thought that its activities were superfluous, the Kenyan delegation considered it necessary to recognize the importance of its role, which was, inter alia, to make public opinion aware of the sufferings of the Namibian people. 29. In the present case, financial considerations should be overlooked and it should be understood that it was a political decision the members of the Fifth Committee were being asked to take. The independence and freedom of the Namibian people were easily worth the sacrifice asked of the Organization and his delegation would vote for the Advisory Committee's recommendations. 30. Mrs. KNEZEVIC (Yugoslavia) said that her delegation wished to emphasize that the purpose of strengthening the Council's programme of activities was to make the international community, and in particular the countries which were supporting South Africa, aware of the situation of the Namibian people and the inadmissibility of co-operation with the occupying regime. It was to be hoped that the Council's activities would make it possible to put a speedy end to the immoral practices of the racist regime of South Africa. Her delegation therefore supported the Secretary-General's request and the recommendations of the Advisory Committee concerning the financial implications of the recommendations of the Council for 
analysis: The text discusses the financial implications of the Council for Namibia's recommendations, and how it relates to the independence and freedom of the Namibian people. It seems to be focused on the political aspect of the situation, with the aim of putting an end to the racist regime of South Africa. The text does not mention economic development, natural resources, industry, transport, communication, health, education, employment, humanitarian aid, or culture. The mention of science and technology is unlikely, given the context of the situation. Therefore, it is likely that the category is related to international relations or politics.