text: United States Government in ~L-99-658, but with the entry into force of the Compact subj'ect to: (a) u.s. President certifying to u.s. congress that the Compact has been duly ratified by Palau -39-executive Order No. 84 (b) according to lts constitutional process; and that u.s. has .ability· to·ex·ercise its security authority and dispense its defense responsibility therein; u. s. c~:mqress enact111g an legislation (i.e. H.J~ Res. 175) entry into force of the· Compact;· and implementing authorizing .t c) certain agreements between tlie United States and Palau have been dul'Y .cbncluded 'as required under ·the compact; and ' · · WHEREAS, authorized under RPPL No. 2-22 and ·pursuant to Executive Order·. Nos·. 46 ahd <47, the Fourth ~ompact Plebiscite was held in. Palau on December 2, 1986 resulting in 66% approval vote; and WHEREAS, authorized under RPPL No. 2-27, and pursuant to Executive order Nos. 56, 57 and 58, the Fifth Compact Plebiscite was held on June 30, 1987~ and resulting in 68% approval vote; and " WHEREAS, authorized under RPPL No. 2-30, a consti.tutional Amendment Referendum was held on August 4, 1987, resulting in 73% affirmative popular vote, and in positive votes by fourteen out of the sixteen states; and WHEREAS, authorized Executive Order No. 60, held on August 21, 1987 and by RPPL No. 2-30, ifid pursuant to the Sixth compact Plebiscite was resulting in 73% approval vote; WHEREAS, in-civil Action No. 161-87, and affirmed in Civil Appeal No. 8-88, the supreme Court of the Republic of Palau ruled, am~ng other things, that: (a) Article XIV, section l(c) of the constitution requires that any legislative proposal for constitutional amendment be approved by three-fourths (75%) vote by members of the senate and House of Delegates, but RPPL No. 2-30 was passed only by simple majority of both 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the ratification process of a compact between the United States and Palau, which involves various plebiscites and constitutional amendments. It seems to be focused on the political and legal aspects of the agreement, rather than specific economic, environmental, or social issues. Therefore, it is likely related to the governance and international relations of the two countries.