text: page 15 entitled to register his trade mark under the terms of this Act and, in this respect, shall be granted precedence over other applicants. The registration shall bear the same date as the registration in the other State." 57. Article 38 prescribes a penalty of imprisonment for a period not exceeding one year and/or a fine not exceeding 100 dinars for any person who, with fraudulent intent, commits, attempts to commit or aids or abets in the commission of any of the following acts: (a) Use of a trade mark registered under the terms of this Act, or of an imitation thereof, on goods of the same type as those for which the trade mark was registered; (b) Sale, or acquisition with a view to sale or offering for sale, of goods bearing a trade mark the use of which constitutes an offence; (c) Use of a trade mark, which has been duly registered by another person under the terms of this Act, with a view to advertising goods of the same type as those registered by the said other person; (d) Manufacture, etching, engraving or sale of any wooden or metallic plate, stamp or die or any other object for the reproduction of a duly registered trade mark, or any imitation thereof, with a view to enabling any person other than the owner of that registered mark to use it, or the imitation thereof, on goods of the same type as those for which the said mark was registered. 58. In the judgement which it handed down on 26 January 1985 in case No. 163/84, the Jordanian High Court of Justice confirmed the legal protection of trade marks. It ruled that registration was not permissible in the case of a trade mark which promoted unfair commercial competition or 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the legal framework and regulations surrounding trade marks, including the protection of intellectual property and the penalties for fraudulent use of trade marks. This suggests that the text is related to the commercial and economic sphere.