text: and security; and today, in order to keep the peace which was lron at the price of enormous losses, we must again combine the political will and the resources of allcountries in order to achieve universal security, a return to d6tente, theaffirrnation in international relations of the principle of peaceful co-existence and ultimately the solution of the overriding problem of the decade, the preventionof nuclear rdar. UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS lOriginal: RussianJ [12 February 1985] I. The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics fully shares the conviction expressedin General Assembly resolution 39/L48 p on prevention of nuclear hrar that theelimination of the danger of such a war is the most acute and urgent task of thepresent day. fts solution not only determines mankindrs ability to deal with allthe other problerns facing it, but also affects its very existence. Surely nowthere can hardly be a single Government or responsible politician prepared todispute openly this conclusion, which has been irrefutably proven by scientists andby civilian and military experts in many countries of the world. 2. However, as t.he General Assembly stated with deep concernr the danger ofnulcear war is increasing. fn order to counter this ominous trend successfully,its origin must be clearly understood. It lies in the stubborn rel.uctance ofcertain States to recognize the realities of the nuclear and space age, and inpractice to regard the prevention of nuclear lrar as their principal goal ininternational relations. This is evidenced by the propounding of various doctrinesand concepts based on the admissibility of the first use of nuclear weapons, whichare now being supplemented by ideas of using outer space for this purpose. Inother words' these States are thinking about how to prepare for and win a nuclearwar and not about avoiding the very possibility of such a war being unleashed or
analysis: The text appears to be a diplomatic statement or a speech on international relations, focusing on the threat of nuclear war and the need for collective action to prevent it. It does not mention any specific economic, environmental, or technological issues, but rather emphasizes the importance of international cooperation and the need to address the root causes of the nuclear threat.