text: Loi sur la détention préventive BE ...; CH CP 110 (7); FR nom donné jusqu'en 1970 à l'actuelle détention provisoire et utilisé toujours dans la langue courante (Dalloz Proc. pén. pp. 514¬ 515); RW CPP 37, SMR 84, E/CN.4/Sub.2/471, para. 21 - 384 - E pre-trial detention S prisión preventiva - detención preventiva* EN; the corresponding terms are remand In çustpdy (Osbom remand. OCL roniand) where deprivation of liberty of the accused takes place during magistrates' court proceedings, whether on examination or trial, and cpmjt-t^al (Osbom, OCL, usually expanded to committal (in custody) for trial or committal (in custody) for, sentence) where it takes place on the conclusion of magistrates' court proceedings or during Crown Court proceedings. EN: preventive detention was a punishment (1948-1967) for persistent offenders, not a pre-trial measure; now the term preventive detention is primarily understood as meaning executive as opposed to judicial detention. In US and among comparative law writers pre-trial detention is called preventive detention (Merr3nnan 700, E/CN.4/Suh.2/471, para. 21), in US sometimes simply detention (CJD). SMR 84 en détention préventive, awaiting trial. Note 1¬ * CO CPP 437, 441, ES Const. 17(2) F détention provisoire (FR CPP 137, 144-148.5, 714-716, Dalloz Proc. pen. pp. 514-531, GE Const. 15) = détention préventive F détention qui précède le jugement (E/CN.4/Sub.2/471) = détention préventive E detention without trial V. executive detention E detentor =ï S detentor - 385 - detentor E holder - keeper - occupier - (mere) possessor - (mere) custodian - detentor* F détenteur E detenu (IN) = detainee F détenu = detenido S deterioros (CL) E waste F dégradations S determinar a cometer un delito (UY) E to instigate the commission of an offence F inciter à coiranettre un délit F détournement de pouvoir (FR, CJEC) E misuse of powers S desviación de poder dette 
analysis: The text appears to be a legal text, specifically discussing pre-trial detention and related concepts. The language used is formal and technical, indicating a focus on legal or academic contexts. The text does not mention specific industries, economic development, or environmental issues, which suggests it is not related to those categories. Instead, it seems to be focused on the legal framework and concepts surrounding pre-trial detention.