text: 2. A category of property, or part thereof, listed in paragraph 1 shall not be subject to measures of constraint in connection with a proceeding hefore a court of a forum State unless the State in question has specifically consented to the taking of measures of constraint in respect of that category of its property, or part thereof, under paragraph 1 (a) of article 21, or allocated or earmarked that property within the meaning of paragraph 1 (b) of the same article. If State property including a segregated State property is entrusted by the State to a State enterprise for commercial purposes, the State cannot invoke immunity from a measure oi a constraint before the court of a forum State in respect of that State prcperty.” - 101 -to (c), which were by and large the same as those contained in paragraph 1 of former article 23 as well as those listed in artiole 21 of the text adopted on first reading. The Special Rapporteur, however, suggested three major changes to the texts of those exceptions as adopted on first reading. Filet, a reference to arbitration agreements had been introduoed in paragraph 1, subparagraph (a) (iI. Second, a drafting change had been made in paragreph 1, subparagraph (a) (iii) for the same reason as the similar change in article 8, paragraph 1 (c). Third, the words “the property is in the territory of the forum State” had been added at the beginning of paragraph 1 (c). Article 22 basically reproduced the original version of article 23, Article 23 in the second alternative was a new article. Article 11 ti had already provided that a State enterprise was subject to the same rules and liabilities as wers applicable to a national or juridical person. Accordingly, in respect of
analysis: The text appears to be related to international law, specifically discussing the immunity of State property from measures of constraint in a court of a forum State. The context suggests that it may be related to the regulation of State-owned enterprises and their activities. The language used is technical and formal, indicating that it may be part of a treaty or a legislative document.