text: was supposedly undertaken on behalf of a Territory which is illegally occupied by South Africa in defiance of United Nations resolutions and contrary to the Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice.z Accordingly, the fact that South Africa launches military attacks from Na- mibia under the doctrine of -hot pursuit or pre-emptive strike compounds the unacceptability and illegality of the act. 48. The question, then, is what is to be done in this year of the fortieth anniversary of the United Nations, when Member States are seeking to reaffirm the role and author- ity of the,United Nations and of the Council in respect of the non-use of force in international relations and other principles of international law. What action must be taken against a State that constantly, persistently and callously disregards international law and the will of the intema- tional community in the area of the non-use of force in international relations? 49. The Trinidad and Tobago delegation wishes to’reiter-. ate that the appropriate mechanisms for taking action under these circumstances exist in Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations. We are of the view that South Africa’s policy of aggression towards ‘Angola must be condemned unanimously by the’ Council. We of the Trinidad and Tobago delegation are convinced that a strong signal should be sent to the racist regime. It must be made abundantly clear that the international community will not allow a State, on the basis of an archaic and abhorrent theory of human relations or some, alleged manifest right, to use the Territory of Namibia as a spring- board for perpetrating armed attacks or for the occupation of the territory of Angola. Such actions by South Africa threaten international peace and security. That a Territory for which the United Nations is responsible should be used 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing international relations, specifically the illegality of South Africa's occupation of Namibia and its military attacks on Angola, and the need for the international community to take action against this aggression. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting that the text is a speech or statement from a government representative.