text: Angola. We wish to convey to the Council the feelings of our countries as expressed in the Final Political Declara- tion [see S/17610 and Corr.1, annex I’j of the ministerial Conference held at Luanda in September 1985 and, espe- cially, as expressed in the special communique of that meeting on the situation in South Africa [ibidj. We hope that the Council will add its voice in full support of the demand of the majority of the international community . 48. The PRESIDENT: The next speaker is the Minister for Foreign Affairs of Ghana, Mr. Obed Asamoah, whom I welcome. I invite him to take a place at the Council table and to make his statement. 49. Mr. ASAMOAH (Ghana): May I fmt extend to you, Sir, my sincere congratulations on your assumption of the presidency of the Security Council for the month of Octo- ber. I have no doubt that the Council and the United Nations as a whole will reap lasting benefit during your tenure of oflice from your wisdom and wide experience. 50. I should also like to take this opportunity to express the appreciation of my delegation to Sir John Thomson, the representative of the United Kingdom, for the able manner in which he, and also the British Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, Sir Geoffrey Howe, conducted the affairs of the Council during September. 51. The Government and people of Ghana are pro- foundly shocked by South Africa’s brazen arrogance and continued defiance of the Security Council. Only two weeks ago the Council met and unanimously adopted reso- lution 571 (1985) condemning South Africa for its flagrant violation of the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Angola. At the very least one would have expected South Africa to respect the unanimous decision of the Council. But quite the contrary has happened. South Africa has not 
analysis: This text appears to be a diplomatic statement, discussing the situation in Angola and South Africa, and the reactions of various countries. It does not contain specific information about economic development, natural resources, agriculture, industry, transport, communication, health, education, employment, humanitarian aid, or culture. However, it does touch on international relations and politics, which could be related to science and technology in a broader sense.