text: right for me and all, not something which oectain parties oan mjoy to the detciumt of others. That is why Egypt calls for the follow ing . We feel that we must see the implec&ntation of Security Council resolutiona 242 (1967) and 338 (19731, and other relevant United Nations resolutions, which call for au end to Israeli occupation of the Arab territories occupied since June 1967, including East Jerusalem , and recognition of the right of the Palestinian people to aelfdetectination and the creation of their ayh dtate. To ensure that the Middle East cm enjoy a just and lasting plaid, when the tim is c ipe there sharld be an inticnational peaoe mnfecenoe, for &ioh of course adequate prepacatione will have to be made. &WPt invites all the parties mnoerned, first and foremost Israel and Palestine, to embark arr a dialogue as coon as possible, QI the basis of rutual simultaneous recognition of the two mrties involve, Iera& and Palestine, $n order to arrive at a comprehensive settlement of the Arab-Israeli conflict an the basis of the right of the Palestinian people to indakgeh&na and self-betecmination in its om national lmd and the right of all the .%atea of the tegicm to live in piw2e within safe, recognnized frcntlere. mpt calls fOt L'ef3EXxt for the application of the Fourth Geneva -vention, of 1949, in the ocoupied Palestinian teecitoriee , and states that theht annexation and the fnstallatfon of settlers in them f5 una&zeptable. NJ/hat S/PV. 2923 224-225 (Mr. Elaraby, Egypt) Egypt calls upm the Security Council to rmffim that the creation of eettlemnts In the cxcupfed Arab territories, including Jewsale=, is illegal and &l obstacl8 to peace. WPt believes that the necessary stepa mast be taken to gut an end to the transfer of immigrants to the occupied territories , and calls for the application 
analysis: The text appears to be a diplomatic statement focused on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the Middle East peace process. It does not mention economic development, natural resources, agriculture, industry, transport, communication, international trade, health, education, employment, or humanitarian aid. It does not seem to be related to culture or science and technology either. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting a focus on international relations and politics.