text: racist South Africa refer to the racist regime’s “regional responsibilities” [ibid., para. 29’J. Indeed, it is responsible as a regional policeman of Western imperialism; it is respon- sible for its apartheid policies and structures; it is responsi- ble for creating and maintaining State terrorism. His reference to the racist regime’s “responsibilities for the security of its own people” [ibid] is such an apt phrase, for the elitist white minority’s security and privilege are built upon the oppression and the blood of the majority. And, of course, “the security of the people of . . . Namibia” refers to turning Namibia into a garrison State, illegally occupied and its people enslaved by the racist rulers. 136. The Council has recently held a debate at the request of Tunisia. On behalf of my delegation, I should like to extend sympathy to my Tunisian colleague and, through him, to his Government and to the victims of that air massacre. My delegation cannot help speculating about the specific and general similarities in the two cases: in each case, a racist attacker whose Government rests on the prin- ciples of racism and racial discrimination; in each case, a regime which justifies its acts on ideological grounds. In each case, the regime is in illegal occupation of territory; in each case, the regime is the military Power in the area; in each case, the regime is guilty of violating the sovereignty and territorial integrity of neighbouring and not-so- neighbouring States; in each case, many of its citizens are disenfranchised and treated as second-class citizens; in each case, the regime practises a form of settler colonialism; in each case, the regime has put thousands of patriots into prison or sent them into exile; in each case, the regime bases itself on so-called God-given dispensation; in each case, the 
analysis: The text appears to be a speech or statement criticizing a racist regime in South Africa, highlighting its oppressive policies, territorial occupation, and human rights violations. The language used is political and ideological, emphasizing the regime's racist and colonialist nature. The text does not mention specific economic, environmental, or scientific issues, but rather focuses on the political and social aspects of the regime.