text: The PKESIDWT: The representative of Kuwait has asked to speak, and I nw call on him. Mr. ABULKWAN (Kuwait) (interpretation from Arabic): I apologize for making another statement, but feel 1 must respati to the representative of Iraq. I was being extrearely hanest. This was made plain by the Pact that the representative of Iraq aqreed with me in his reference to the colonial presenoe in the region and to the way in which the Arab world was partitioned. His statement confirms my statement that Iraq’s expwsianist objectives would not stop at Kuwait’s bcundaries. We knw the Iraqi leadership’s promises; we have come ti see where those promises have led. The Council has heard an attempt to justify the recent attempt to annex Kuwait. The representative of Icag follows that jtitification with a promise that the aggression will not reach other oauntries. In the light of what we have seen of the credibility of Iraqi promises and the philosophy behind the ilwasiQ1 and annexation of Kuwait - as mabe clear a moment ago by the representitive of Iraq - I leave it to the Council to draw the proper canclusiars about the extent of Iraqi aggression in the regicn. The representative of Iraq said thst the Iraqi Revolutionary Cuumand Ccuncfl was his country’s highest authority. I would point art that the Iraqi Revolutionary Command Carncil ia not the highest authority in the world. The best answer to the Iraqi delegaticn’s alleged eternal mity is the answer the Secutity Ccnmcil has opken through it.3 unanirmus adoption of reaolutim 662 (19901. The international authority of the Security Comcil eupersedes that of the Iraqi delega tion’e Rf2voLu ticnary Camnand Carncil. BtS/U s/w. 2934 49 The 1?R!SSIDEUT: There are no further speakers. The Security Council has thus cc~~cluded the present staqe of its ccnsideraticn oE the item cn its aqenda. 
analysis: The text appears to be a statement made by the representative of Kuwait during a meeting of the Security Council, likely in response to Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. The language used is formal and diplomatic, with a focus on international law and the actions of the Iraqi government. The text does not mention economic development, natural resources, agriculture, industry, transport, or communication, and it is unlikely that it would be classified under these categories.