text: forum State with certain exceptions to that rule. The question to be examined, according to the Special Rapporteur , was whether thooe exceptiona were so extensive a8 practically to negate the non-immunity principle, which he assumed to be generally accepted. The Special Rapporteur had previouely made two proposals in his preliminary report which had the effect of narrowing the scope of the exceptions to the rule of non-immunity, namely to delete the reference to the social security requirement in paragraph 1 U/ and to delete subparagraphs (a) and (b) of paragraph 2. M/ 177, The deletion of the social security requirement wa6 proposed by the Special Rapporteur in response to the view expressed that not all States had a social security system for their work force. As regards the deletion of subparagraph (a) of paragraph 2, the Special Rapporteur had suggested it since, according to the views of some members and Governments, the category of persona covered by this provision was too bread, for it would make the rule of Be/ The United Kingdom State Immunity Act of 1978, section 4, contained detailed provisions on the subject-matter, which were followed closely in the State Immunity Act of Singapore of 1973 and the State Immunity Ordinance of Pakistan of 1981; the United States Foreign Sow#reign Imm\lnities Act of 19’10 and the State Imfnunity Act of Canada, on the other hand, contained no such specific provisions. The Luropean Convention on State Immunity of 1972 contained detailed pr,ovisions in its article 5. Ql/ AlCN.41431, p. 24, footnote 6. 821 A1CN.41415 and Corr.1 and 2, p, 74, para. 7. 831 Lbid., pera. 8. - 78 -non-immunity establiehod under paragraph 1 inapplicable in respect of all employees who had been recruited to perform services assooiatod with (fairly
analysis: The text appears to be discussing a specific legal framework related to state immunity, with references to various international and national laws, such as the European Convention on State Immunity and national state immunity acts. The context seems to be focused on the application of this principle in different countries and its implications on employment and labor laws.