text: if he has the continuing support of the members of the Council, for they must share the consequences of the manldate they have given him, since in the final analysis international peace and security remain the primary responsibility of the Council. 120. The PRESIDENT (intryretation fro/n Chi- ,rese): I shall now call on representatives who wish to speak in exercise of the right of reply. 121. Mr. TROYANOVSKY (Union of Soviet Social- ist Republics) (interpretation ,#kom Russian): I should just like to say a few words. 122. The representative of the United Kingdom expressed surprise at my statement. I can say that we, like, I believe, many others, would express surprise about his statement in explanation of vote. The repre- sentative of the United Kingdom referred to resolu- tion 502 (1982), but he completely failed, as indeed has his Government, to take note of paragraph 1 of that resolution, which calls for an immediate cessation of hostilities. 123. In so far as the resolution just adopted by the Council is concerned, the representative of the United Kingdom also entirely ignored the fact that in paragraph 2 of that resolution the Secretary-General is requested to undertake a mission of good offices bearing in mind not only resolution 502 (1982) but also the approach outlined in his statement of 21 May [236Oth meeting]. That is a very important point which we cannot overlook. 124. Unfortunately, we get the impression that the representative of the United Kingdom has once again adopted the course of putting forward ultimatums. This calls into question the sincerity of his voting in favour of the draft resolution, which we have just witnessed. 125. Sir Anthony PARSONS (United Kingdom): My Soviet colleague and I have different interpretations of these resolutions, as we frequently have different interpretations of other resolutions. 
analysis: The text appears to be a transcript of a discussion at the United Nations Security Council, where representatives from various countries are debating a draft resolution related to international peace and security. The language used is formal and diplomatic, with references to specific resolutions and statements made by the Secretary-General. The tone is critical, with the Soviet representative expressing disappointment and questioning the sincerity of the United Kingdom's voting in favor of the draft resolution.