text: further period ending 15 December 1969, in the expectation that by then sufficient progress toward a final solution will make possible a withdrawal or substantial reduction of the Force. Adopted unanimously at the 1474th meeting. Decision At its 1521st meeting, on 11 December 1969, the Council decided to invite the representatives of Cyprus, Turkey and Greece to participate, without vote, in the discussion of the item entitled "Letter dated 26 De- 6 cember 1963 from the Permanent Representative of Cyprus addressed to the President of the Security Coun­ cil (S/5488) :17 report of the Secretary-General on the United Nations Operation in Cyprus (S/9521)".18 Resolution 274 (1969) of 11 December 1969 The Security Council, Noting from the report of the Secretary-General of 3 December 1969 (S/9521)18 that in the present cir­ cumstances the United Nations Peace-keeping Force in Cyprus is still needed if peace is to be maintained in the island, Noting that the Government of Cyprus has agreed that in view of the prevailing conditions in the island it is necessary to continue the Force beyond 15 De­ cember 1969, Noting, from the observations in the report, that the improvement of the situation in Cyprus has continued during the period under review, 1. Reaffirms its resolutions 186 (1964) of 4 March, 187 (1964) of 13 March, 192 (1964) of 20 June, 193 (1964) of 9 August, 194 (1964) of 25 September and 198 (1964) of 18 December 1964, 201 (1965) of 19 March, 206 (1965) of 15 June, 207 (1965) of 10 August and 219 (1965) of 17 December 1965, 220 (1966) of 16 March, 222 (1966) of 16 June and 231 (1966) of 15 December 1966, 238 (1967) of 19 June and 244 (1967) of 22 December 1967, 247 (1968) of 18 March, 254 (1968) of 18 June and 261 (1968) of 
analysis: The text appears to be a United Nations Security Council resolution, discussing the situation in Cyprus and the continuation of the United Nations Peace-keeping Force in Cyprus. The resolution is focused on maintaining peace in the island, and there is no mention of economic development, natural resources, or environmental issues. The text also does not mention agriculture, forestry, fishing, industry, transport, communication, international trade, health, education, employment, humanitarian aid, or culture.