text: the Special Rapporteur (A/CN,4/424 and Corr.1) rrnf3 his fifth report (A/CN,4/432), which, owing to lack of time, could not be introduced by the Special Rapporteur or considered hy the Commission. 423. The Commission examined the fourth report of the Special Repporteur at its 2176th to 2160th meetings. After diSCUSSing draft articles 1 to 11 the Commission refer them to the Drafting Committee. The and observations by the members of the Commission on those articles are summarised in 424. There was in the Commission for the path charted for the Some members pointed out that the Commission could now give the topic more attention since it had coneideration Some members also emphasised the usefulness of the topic, which would put some order in the diversity and disparity of the law governing international organizations. 425. Some members, while not questioning the need to pursue work on the topic and fulfil the mandate the General Assembly had given the Commission, thought that it might be necessary, before continuing with the study of the topic, to define the ultimate aim of the draft articles which would be adopted and their relationship with the many existing instruments, namely, the constituent instruments of the various organizations covered by the draft, conventions on privileges and immunities and headquarters agreements. 2&w U.&I., paras. 708-726. - 227 -426. One member said that he had doubts whether any useful results could be achieved and whether such results would be acceptable to the States for which the draft articles would 3e intended. He did not eee any urgent need to undertake the codification of a subject-matter which was, in his opinion, already adequately regulated by various instruments in force, such as conventions on priv.Cleges and immunities and headquarters agreements. He thought that the Commission should continue to defer its consideration of the topic.
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the work of the International Law Commission, specifically its consideration of draft articles related to international organizations. The language used is formal and technical, indicating that the topic is likely to be a legal or institutional issue rather than a matter related to economic development, natural resources, or human welfare. The text also mentions the need to codify existing instruments and the potential impact on states, suggesting that the topic is related to international relations or governance.