text: separate articles ana the various forms of guarantees of non-repetition should be explored in more detail. 403. The Special Rapporteur stated that he found in the above considerations an additional reason to maintain legal injury -in addition to moral damage or injury -a6 a justification for the demand and the grant of satisfaction. He was also ready to consider a separate article for guarantees of non-repetition. 404. With regard to the forms of satisfaction, some members felt that instead of enumerat.ing those forms, it was preferable to think of some general terms to cover various measures which might be necessary. Many member a, however, agreed with the Special Rapporteur that the importance of the obligation violated and the degree of negligence of the wrongdoer State should be taken into account in choosing the form or forms of satisfaction. It wacc generally agreed that the declaration of wrongfulness of the act by a competent international tribunal would, in some circumstances, be appropriate - 217 -satisfaction. There were many precedents to that effect. It was noted that in the recent award of 30 April 1990 in the Reinbow case the tribunal specifically stated in paragraph 8 of its decision that the condemnation of one party for breaches of its treaty obligations to the other ma&i public by the decision of the tribunal, constituted in the circumstances appropriate satisfaction for the legal and moral damage caused, 405. As regards w of article 9, some members felt that it should be deleted since it was generally understood that the forms of satisfaction should not be humiliating to States arid inconsistent with their sovereign equality. Others, however, felt that precisely because in the paet some States had abused this form of remedy and had imposed humiliating demands on
analysis: This text appears to be discussing the concept of satisfaction and guarantees of non-repetition in the context of international law and state responsibility. The language used is formal and technical, suggesting a focus on legal and political issues rather than economic or social development. The text references international tribunals and treaty obligations, which further supports the idea that this text is related to international law and diplomacy.