text: ideas, I said that Mr. Denktaah’s reaction was “to reject the agreed neqotinting procedure snd challenge openly the role of the Secretary-General.. when the date tir the extended talks of last February was announced, everybody hwea against hope - and I say this because of a strinq of intransigent statemen@ by Mr. mnktash and Turkish Covernmznt officials - that at long last they had heeded the call of the Security Council contained in the relevant atatRm@nt 9f its then president and the friendly advice by several countries to Ankara, and that a real and extended dialoq~ W.XJ ilnminent. m/4 S,‘t’V. 2928 17 Me. h(!3VcOlrmti!3, cypruo) The hones of all of us were dashed when the whole eECort and the dialoqm that “8s to start on 26 Fcbruecy 1990 and to mntinue tic about two weeks failed. In fact, Mr. benktash never allowed it to resume. The secretary-General had this to 8%’ in his cepoc t to the Se-cur ity Council dated 13 March 1990: *Further, I recalled that, in the course of the discussion, Mr. Denktas had stated that the term ‘communities’ be used in a runner that was synonymous with the term ‘peoples*, each having a separate II iqht to ‘se1 f-determinetion*.a - I could almost say, “0 b?mpoca? 0 lwxes!“- %::. Denk tash also proposad certain other term for the word *communities*. I stated that, in the context of the intercommunal talks, the introduction of terminology that was different from that used by the Security Council had thus posed more than a semantic problem and that, unless acceptable to both sides, any chanqe in terminoloqy could alter the mnceptual framework to uhich all had thus far adhered. Tn the circumstances, I came to the conclusion, regrettably, that we faced an imwsse of a substantive kind, which raised 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing a diplomatic crisis or a conflict between parties, with specific references to the Secretary-General, the Security Council, and a particular individual named Mr. Denktash. The language used is formal and official, suggesting a high-stakes political or international relations context. The text also mentions specific dates, events, and agreements, which further supports this analysis.