text: May 1949, on the admission of Israel to the Unit&d Nations, only after “Nofing furthermore the declaration of the State of Israel that it ‘unreservedly accepts the obligations of the United Nations Charter and undertakes to honour them from the day when it becomes a Member of the United Nations’, “Recalhg its resolutions of 29 November 1947 and 11 December 1948 and taking note of the deciardtions and explanations made by the representative of the Government of Israel before the acl /WC Political Committee in respect of the implementation of the said resolutions”, did the GeneraI Assembly admit Israel to the United Nations. 3 23. Thus, the admission of Israel into the United Nations was conditional on its implementation of resolution 194 (III) pertaining to the repatriation of the Palestinians, and on its acceptance of the continued validity of resolution 181 (II) of 29 November 1947 on partition, Israel, having secured United Nations membership, spurned those resolutions and disregarded their provisions, It retreated from its declaration that obliged it to observe those resolutions. 24. The present mood of Israel towards the Palestinians is best reflected in Mrs. Meir’s interview with the BBC, She was asked if she would sit with the Palestinians. She replied: “No, because we have no negotiation with the Palestinians. They have nothing to offer us and we have nothing to offer them.” That was reported in the [wadi Digest of 13 October 1972, on page 1. 25. It is this congenital inability of Israel to realize the depth of the Palestinians insistence on repatriation, coupled with its exclusivist structure, that has made a just peace so elusive. For us, peace and the rights of the Paiestinians are so intertwined, so indivisible, so inseparable, that the denial of the latter obliterates the former. The respect of the 
analysis: The text appears to be a historical and political analysis of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, focusing on the admission of Israel to the United Nations and the subsequent disregard for resolutions related to the repatriation of Palestinians. The tone is critical of Israel's stance and highlights the obstacles to a just peace. The language used is formal and academic, suggesting a scholarly or diplomatic context.