text: 242 243 250 251 252 255 257 258 260 261 262 II. Specialized aqencies and other orqanizations waintaining liaison offices at Headauarters International Labour Organisation ••••••••••••••• 264 Food and Aariculture Organization of the United Nations • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 26 5 United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization ••••••••••••••••••••••••• 266 World Health Orqanization ••••••••••••••••••••••• 267 World Bank • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 268 International Monetary Fund ••••••••••••••••••••• 269 World Intellectual Property Orqanization •••••••• 270 International Fund for Aqricultural Oevelopwent. 271 United Nations Industrial Developwent Orqanization • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 272 International Atowic Energy Aqency •••••••••••••• 273 III. Non-wewber States waintaininq perwanent observer wissions at Headauarters Dewocratic People's Republic of Korea. 274 Holy See •••••••••••• 276 Monaco •••••••••••••• 277 Republic of Korea •• 278 San Marino ••••••••• 280 Switzerland •••••••• 281 IV. Interqovernwental organizations having received a standinq invitation to participate in the sessions and the work of the General Assewblv as observers and waintaininq perwanent offices at Headquarters Asian-African Legal consultative Cowwittee •••••• 282 Council for Mutual Econoroic Assistance •••••••••• 283 European Econoroic Cowrounity ••••••••••••••••••••• 284 League of Arab States • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 285 
analysis: The text appears to be a list of international organizations with liaison offices at the Headquarters of the International Labour Organisation. The organizations listed seem to be primarily focused on economic development, international cooperation, and humanitarian aid, with some overlap into other areas such as education and health. The presence of organizations focused on agriculture, forestry, and fishing, as well as industry and intellectual property, suggests that the category should include a mix of economic and development-related fields.