text: "5. Decides to extend the mandate of the Special Rapporteur for a further year; "6. Requests the Special Rapporteur to report to the Commission at its forty-seventh session; "7. Takes note with appreciation of the readiness of the Government of Romania to co-operate with the Commission and its Special Rapporteur; "8. Requests the Secretary-General to continue to provide all necessary assistance to the Special Rapporteur to enable him to carry out his mandate in the best possible conditions; "9. Decides to continue its consideration of the human rights situation in Romania at its forty-seventh session under the agenda item entitled 'Questions of the violation of human rights and fundamental freedoms in any part of the world, with particular reference to colonial and other dependent countries and territories'." 378. At the 52nd meeting, on 6 March 1990, the representative of Sweden introduced a revised draft resolution (E/CN.4/1990/L.60/Rev.l), sponsored by Australia*, Canada, France, Germany, Federal Republic of, Hungary, Luxembourg*, the Netherlands*, Portugal, Sweden and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. -242-379. The attention of the Commission was drawn to an estimate of the administrative and programme budget implications (E/CN.4/1990/L.64) 1/ of draft resolution E/CN.4/1990/L.60/Rev.l. 380. At the same meeting, the draft resolution was adopted without a vote. 381. For the text as adopted, see chapter II, section A, resolution 1990/50. 382. A statement was made by the Observer for Romania after the vote. Summary or arbitrary executions 383. In connection with this matter, the Commission had before it the following documents: E/CN.4/1990/22 and Corr.l and Add.l, E/CN.4/1990/NGO/62, E/CN.4/1990/NGO/73. 384. At the 34th meeting, on 21 February 1990, the Special Rapporteur, Mr. S. Amos Wako, introduced his report (E/CN.4/1990/22 and Corr.l and Add.l) to the Commission. 385. At the 52nd meeting, on 6 March 1990, the representative of Sweden
analysis: The text appears to be related to a UN Commission's decision-making process regarding human rights in Romania. It discusses the extension of a Special Rapporteur's mandate, the reporting of human rights situations, and the cooperation with the Romanian government. The text also mentions the adoption of a draft resolution without a vote. Based on this information, it is likely that the category is related to human rights or international law.