text: as a direct result of that inc!.tement, and, regrettably, has led to more casualties. PM Radio, broadcasting from Baghdad, is mmplementing those efforts by inci tfng not only the Palestinian Arabs in the territories but also the Arab citizens of Israel. Gn 22 May the station announced: .The enemy is faced with csne unified people in the Galilee, the Triangle, the Negevr the Gaza Strip, the HeJest EQnk and Jerusalem, Best wishes ti the heroic aenw ewtended for mobilization o(1 all the land of Palestine”. Owe again the PLG claims openly that in its view Nazareth, the Galilee and the Negev are part and parcel of “Palestine*. For the PI.43 there is simply no room for Ierael. Fr m the shoulder strap carried with pride by Arafat depicting the proposed State of Palestine encompassing all of the State of Israel% from 1-he map spread have a copy of f-his for meubere to see - from the rhetoric employed by him, such as the P(S/6 s/Pv. 2926 .R (Mr. Bein, Israel) *~utbucst oE racism against the paleslthian massss in the Galilee, the Triangle and the Negev” (s/Pv.2923, p. 11) 3 from hi5 demand to halt all Jewish immigraticn to Israeli indeed, feom his very own words - “the State of Israel . . . must disappear . . .m (6 Jnnuary 1990, Libyan News Agency) 8 “The Jews in occupied Palestine should return to their countries of origin . . . the popular revolution will aDntinue until all of Palestinian soil is liberated . ..II (JANA, I3 January 199O)i or “3.5 million are currently OCCUlsying all of Palestine [that is, Israel] . ..* (Sudan television, 1 March 1990): from all of that the intentions of the Pw) continue to be coxu~unicated loud and clear : to bring about the complete destruction of Israel. 
analysis: The text appears to be a political statement or report, focusing on the actions and rhetoric of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and its leader Yasser Arafat. It highlights the organization's goals to destroy Israel and its efforts to mobilize Palestinians in various territories. The text also mentions specific incidents and broadcasts that have led to casualties. Given the political nature of the content, it is unlikely to be related to economic development, natural resources, agriculture, forestry, fishing, industry, transport, communication, international trade, health, education, employment, or humanitarian aid.