text: Union for the information on Chernobyl and ex­ pressed the hope that the Soviet people would also receive that information, because it seemed that they were unaware of much of what had occurred. 82. Mr. MORA-GODOY (Observer for Cuba), speaking in exercise of the right of reply, said that the representative of the United States should measure his words with regard to Cuba and that it should not be forgotten that the Government of the United States was hiding behind its statements on anti­ terrorism in order to commit acts of terrorism, as had been the case recently in the Libyan Arab Jamahiri­ ya, where it had attacked the civilian population, or that it used paramilitary forces, such as the Ku Klux Klan and other organizations of that type, in order to attack minorities and violate their civil rights. 83. Mr. SAFRONCHUK (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics), speaking in exercise of the right of reply, said that the representative of the United States had once again demonstrated his ignorance of the history and constitutional structure of the Soviet Union with regard to the pact with the Hitler regime and the republics which he had referred to, which formed part of the Soviet Union, just as any state in the United States had been an integral part of that country from the moment it had been annexed, beginning with the 13 colonies which had achieved independence from Great Britain. Referring to the information on Chernobyl, he said that TASS news agency had already disseminated news on that sub­ ject among the Soviet population. The meeting rose at 5.30 p.m. 7th meeting Thursday, 1 May 1986, at 10.40 a.m. President: Mr. Manuel DOS SANTOS (Mozambique) AGENDA ITEM 2 Implementation of the Programme of Action for the Second Decade to Combat Racism and Racial 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing a meeting of the United Nations, where representatives are addressing issues related to international politics, specifically criticizing the actions of the United States and the Soviet Union. The mention of Chernobyl suggests that there may be a focus on environmental issues, but the primary focus seems to be on diplomatic tensions and accusations.