text: well-established procedures often makes it difficult, if not impossible, to determine what occurred with respect to specific posts. The absence of such procedures may lend itself to improper- 18 - conduct and to inferences of unfair treatment when the surrounding circumstances are equivocal or inadequately explained. The Tribunal expresses the hope that the Administration will promptly take steps to establish proper procedures. XIX.The Panel on Discrimination seemed to be impressed with evidence that, long before the episode in question, the Applicant began having controversies with the Administration because of positions he was taking as a union representative and because of other conflicts which apparently stemmed from his personality. If the Applicant was treated unfairly in connection with any of the earlier episodes referred to by the Panel, those should have been the subject of timely efforts by him for seeking redress. This was apparently not done. XX.For the foregoing reasons, the application is rejected in its entirety. (Signatures) Roger PINTO President Jerome ACKERMAN Vice-President Samar SEN Member Geneva, 15 May 1990 R. Maria VICIEN-MILBURN Executive Secretary 
analysis: The text appears to be a decision or ruling made by a tribunal or panel regarding an employment dispute. The language used is formal and technical, suggesting a legal or administrative context. The discussion of procedures, conduct, and treatment of an employee suggests that the category is likely related to employment or labor.