text: 20. In the meantrrne, it must be recognized that the effect of theadmission to the European Communitres of the Greek cyprrot stdeunder the assumed title of "the Republic of cyprus" ."p..sen!eo asit is tcday exclusively by the Greek Cypriot element in the islandwogld in effect, be to g.i ve to creece i secono vote rn atI thedeliberations of the Communities. There is no room for thepretence that, left to itself, the creek Cyprrot community,i rrevocably comm'i tted in spirit a€ it has arlrays been to union withGreece, would act within the organs of the European community asanythrng other than a proxy of Greece. The only way to ensure thatCyprus acts as a fully i ndependent member of lhe Europeancommunities is to insist that membershi p shourd not be given to itunti l there is reasonabre certarnty thai its for€ign anJ economrcpolicy will not be subservrent to the interests of any neighbor.That can only be assured by the establ ishment within dyprus of asystem of government reflecting the existence of the twocommunttres, each possessing the capacity to prevent theeploitation of the country's position for the sole ordi sproportionate benefit of the other. 21 , In its most recent resolutjon on Cyprus, of 12 March 1990(649(19s0)), the UN Securrty counci I caileO on ,'the partiesconcerned to refrain from any action lhat cou.l d aggrav.ate thesituation. " In the special ized vocabulary that hii developed inthis context, the words "the parties.. means not only the twoCyp.i ot communities but the interested governments, includ.i ng, wrtnspecial reference to the present contexi, creece, The present moveclear'l y aggravates the situatjon by destroying the equal ity ofstalus between the two communities that is the essential foundatronfor the continuance of negotiations on the wider ouestion. 22. It must be realized that the entry into the EuropeanCommunities of a uniquely Greek Cypriot, state cannot contribute tothe resolution of the di fferences between the two communities.Participation in the European Communities can only grow out of thecreation of a new Repubiic of Cyprus that tully refiects the properstatus and role of both communities.A/44/966 -S/21398 English Page11 membershlp, aswellasitsburdens, areenjoyed andbornebyboth communlties genuinely, without discrimination between them. GreekCypriot admission wouldmeanasecond voteforGreece. 20.Inthemeantlme, itmustberecognized thattheeffect ofthe admission totheEuropean Communities oftheGreekCypriot side undertheassumed titleof"theRepublic ofCyprus" represented as itistodayexclusively bytheGreekCypriot element intheisland wouldineffect, betogivetoGreece asecond voteinallthe deliberations oftheCommunities. Thereisnoroomforthe pretence that,lefttoitself, theGreekCypriot community, irrevocably committed inspirit asithasalways beentounionwith Greece, wouldactwithin theorgans oftheEuropean Community as anything otherthanaproxyofGreece. Theonlywaytoensurethat Cyprusactsasafullyindependent member oftheEuropean Communlties istoinsistthatmembership should notbegiventoit untilthereisreasonable certainty thatitsforeign andeconomic policywillnotbesUbservient totheinterests ofanyneighbor. Thatcanonlybeassured bytheestablishment within Cyprus ofa system ofgovernment reflecting theexistence ofthetwo communities, eachpossessing thecapacity toprevent the eploitation ofthecountry's position forthesoleor disproportionate benefit oftheother.
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the implications of the admission of the Greek Cypriot side to the European Communities, specifically the potential impact on the relationship between the Greek Cypriot and Turkish Cypriot communities. The author is arguing that the admission of a uniquely Greek Cypriot state would not contribute to the resolution of the differences between the two communities, and that a new Republic of Cyprus is needed to reflect the proper status and role of both communities. The text does not appear to be discussing economic development, natural resources, or other technical issues.