text: Organization, and the World Health Organization, as well as on the press communiques of the International Committee of the Red Cross. She drew attention to its salient features and read out the relevant parts of the last preambular paragraph and operative paragraphs 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 8. 61. Mrs. PALLEY said that in 1988 she had explained her position regarding certain terms which had enabled her to vote for an almost identical draft resolution. In 1989 she had abstained, because she had thought that the language was too strong and was inappropriate, in that it nowhere recognized the right of the State of Israel to exist within its 1948 boundaries. The present draft resolution was one on which she was sure that, had there been consultations, there would have been unanimity in the Sub-Commission, as in the case of the draft resolution adopted on South Africa. She hoped that there would be consultations on a future occasion. 62. In view of the language, she would unfortunately have to abstain in a vote on draft resolution E/CN.4/Sub.2/1990/L.34. E/CN.4/Sub.2/1990/SR.34 page 9 63. Mr. van BOVEN said that he would, despite serious reservations, concur in the adoption of the draft resolution without a vote. He had also had misgivings over previous draft resolutions and in 1989 had submitted an amendment. 64. He noted some improvement in the present draft resolution, but had reservations about the disproportionate emphasis placed on the present situation in comparison with other human rights situations, in particular some of the wording, for example the use of the word "Condemns" in operative paragraph 7. That word had been used in the resolution already adopted on South Africa, but in respect of practices, whereas in the present draft resolution it referred to a country or a Government. 
analysis: The text appears to be a discussion about a draft resolution related to human rights, specifically mentioning the State of Israel and South Africa. The language used is formal and official, suggesting that it is a report or statement from a meeting or conference. The content does not seem to be related to economic development, natural resources, industry, transport, communication, international trade, employment, or culture. The focus on human rights and humanitarian issues suggests a connection to health, education, or humanitarian aid and relief. However, the text does not mention specific health or educational issues, but rather concentrates on human rights and political situations.