text: Australia, Burkina Faso, China, Denmark, Egypt, France, India, Madagascar, Peru, Thailand, Trinidad and Tobago, Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, United Kingdom of Great-Britain and Northern Ireland, United States of America. Provisional agenda (S/Agenda/2612) 1. Adoption of the agenda 2. Complaint by Angola against South Africa: Letter dated 1 October 1985 from the Permanent Representative of Angola to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Coun- cil (S/17510) The meeting was called to order at 11.20 a.m. Adoption of the agenda The agenda was adopted. Complaint by Angola against South Africa: Letter dated 1 October 1985 from the Permanent Repre- sentative of Angola to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council (S/17510) 1. The PRESIDENT: I should like to inform members of the Council that I have received letters from the represen- tatives of Angola, Cameroon, Cuba, the Islamic Republic of Iran, Kuwait, Nigeria, Senegal, South Africa, Yugosla- via and Zimbabwe in which they request to be invited to participate in the discussion of the item on the Council’s agenda. In conformity with the usual practice, I propose, with the consent of the Council, to invite those representa- tives to participate in the discussion without the right to vote, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Charter and rule 37 of the Council’s provisional rules of procedure. At the invitation of the President, Mr. de FigUredo (Angola) took a place at the Council table: Mr. Engo (Came- roon), Mr. Malmierca Peoli (Cuba), Mr. Rajaie-Khorassani (Islamic Republic of Iran), Mr. Abulhassan (Kuwait). Mr. Garba (Nigeria), Mr. San-6 (Senegal). Mr. von Schirnding (South Africa), Mr. GoIob (Yugoslavia)), and Mr. Chiketa (Zimbabwe) took the places reserved for them at the side of the Council chamber. 2. The PRESIDENT: The Security Council is meeting 
analysis: The text appears to be a meeting summary of the United Nations Security Council, discussing a complaint by Angola against South Africa. The language used is formal and diplomatic, indicating a focus on international relations and politics. There is no mention of economic development, natural resources, or environmental issues, which suggests that these categories are unlikely to be relevant.