text: agree with me. 156. The Zionist non-entity is really nothing. It must be defeated, and it can be defeated very easily. Tbe Moslem nation is really a great, superior and able nation. I am sure that it is capable of eliminating the cancer of zionism from the Middle East and, that it will do so very soon. ‘. 157. The PRESIDENT: I hope that in his speech the representative of the ‘Islamic Republic of Iran was not advoc&ng courses of action contrary to the Charter of the United Nations, the acceptance of which is a condition of. membership of the Organization. If he wishes to do so, the representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran will be able to spe;ik in reply in due course. 158. The next speaker is the. representative, of Israel. I invite him to take a place at the Council table and to make his ‘statement. 159. Mr. NETANYAHU”(Israe1): It is instructive sitting here this afternoon, receiving lectures about human rights, democracy and democratic values from’ the: likes of the representatives of Syria and a few other countries. We owe a special, warm debt to the last speaker, the representative of Iran, who grew tired of the dissimulation of some speak- ers and called the proceedingsand the statements of those 14 speakers what they are. He was clearly exhorting a holy war, a jihad. There is no question about that. Everyone heard it. 160. We are talking here about deportation. I have heard that word come up several times during the present discus- sion. The representative of Iran unabashedly tore the mask off what some representatives have been calling for-the deportation of a State, of an entire people, a holy war. 161. I heard the representative of Syria speak on behalf 
analysis: The text appears to be a discussion related to international politics, specifically focusing on the topic of Zionism and the Middle East. The language used is confrontational and accusatory, suggesting a high level of tension and conflict. The speakers mentioned, including the President of the United Nations, the representative of Iran, and the representative of Israel, are all involved in a heated debate. Given the content and tone of the text, it is likely that it falls under the category of international relations and politics.