text: aome members had proposed the deletion of the entire article einc,j, inthof r view, it was based on the legislation of a few States and such cases co uld in any event be settled through diplomatic ohannelsr some othera had oxpraseed concorn that;,if the act or omission which caused the injury or damcigo WRB attributable to a State, a question of dtato responsibility woult! arise, and the matter aoulQ be resolved only on tho baaio of intbrnetional low and not of national law, It had also been pointed out thst tho provision would croato inconsistency between jurisdictional immunities enjoyed by a StAto under the draft articles ancl those enjoyed by diplomatic agents representing the Stnto under the relevant international agreomonto in force, and that the provision made no distinction bntween sovereign acts encl private law acts. Still at;hers had held tho viow that disputes of this naturo WOW not uncommon nnd that diplomatic protection was not a vie.bls altecnativo as a practical mattor. 166. Considering such differences of V~GWB, the Spociel Rapportour had earlier mat% thretr euggeetions. First, tho addition of 8 now pnragrnptr which would road “Paragraph 1 dose not affect any rulan concerning Stats rosponoibility 85/Tho text, as provieionelly edopkod on first reading by the Commission, read a6 followsI Unless otherwise agreed between tha Stateli concerned, t:t:u immunity of a State canno’;. be invoked before n court. of unotha1 :;t.nt:o which it; otherwise competent in a proceeding which rslet:ar~ to compensation fox, death or injury to ths person or &t.mrrg~ Lo OKlOSS Of t.L3IlC,Ji~Jif~ Jlr-OPfff't.t'y if the act or omission which ia &llogod to bo nLl:ribut:nblu t.tJ Vhf) Stul..~ axld which caueed the death, .tnjury OL' drunfigc? (J(!l!l11.I.Rd 111 WhOlf! Ot III t'ibr t in the territory ok’ the State of the Lorum and if t.ho author of the act.
analysis: The text appears to be discussing a specific aspect of international law, specifically the jurisdictional immunities of states and diplomatic agents. It mentions the concept of diplomatic protection and the relationship between national and international law. The language used is formal and technical, suggesting a highly specialized and legalistic context. Given the focus on international law and jurisdictional immunities, it is likely that the text is related to a specific aspect of international relations or diplomacy.