text: "for the imnediate resumption in a neaningfur ard constructive manrer of thenegotiat.ions betrreen the representatives of the two conmunities, urater theauspices of tlre secretary-Generar, to be conalucted freely oa aa equar footingvith a view to reaching a rnutually acceptable agreement Lased on ineirfundaflental. ard legititnate rights,'. For its part, the Security CounciL endorsed hhis wording by repeating lt ia thepreambles to resolutions 391 (1976), 4Ot (19?6) anat 410 (1927). 25' rn the formal outcorne of the ensuing discussions betw€eu the two cormunitiesthere was no departure frorn the corxcept of negotiation on an equar footiag. The"Hiqh-Level Agreement" of 12 February 1977 beiween president Makarios andPresident Denktas decfared that .twe are seeking an independent, notr_aligled,bi-conununal Federal Republic',. Bi-zonality wai also accepted! ,,the territoryunder the administration of each comnunity shoul.d be discussed ....' 26. Later i! the same year the Security Couacil again call.ed upon ,,the representatives of the two comtnunities,. to resume negotiatioDs (resol,utron4L4 (1977, of 15 Septenbet !977), as ditt the ceneral Assembty iD the by nowrtell-halloared phrase ,'negotiations between Ehe representatives of the twocornmunities, to be conduceed freely on an equaf footing,, (resolution 3Z/LS of9 November 1977 ) . 27. The next gigh-Level Agreement (the so-called ,,to_point Agreemene,,) ofL9 May 1979 between President Denktas and president Kyprianou in no ray departedfron this approach. Even though the Agreenent ilicl nol restate the app-roachexpressly, it accepted it irnpliedJ.y. This Agreement was referr€d to ia GeneraLAssenbLy resolution 34/30 of 20 November 1979 vrhen ,,the representatives of the twocornnuDities" were caLled on to resune negotiations ',on an equal footing,.. Similarlrording also appeared in General Assenbty resolution 37/253 of 13 May i983.A/44/968 S/21463 English Page9 cpmmunity ofthequality ofstatehood thatevinced theentitlement andneedofthat community topossess egualstanding asaStatewiththeGreekCypriot community. Butinanyevent,itissufficient tonotethecontinuing identification bythe Security Council oftheroleofthetwocommunities onanequalfooting. 23.Throughout thisperiodtheapproach oftheSecretary-General tothetwosides inthedispute hadconsistently beenonthebasisthatthetalkswerebetween the twocommunities, notbetween theRepublic ofCyprus andsomesecessionist body.
analysis: The text appears to be discussing a political conflict between two communities in Cyprus, specifically the Greek Cypriot community and the Turkish Cypriot community. The language used is formal and diplomatic, indicating a focus on international relations and negotiations. The text mentions the Secretary-General of the United Nations, the Security Council, and General Assembly resolutions, which suggests that the issue is being addressed through international diplomatic efforts.