text: respectively, concerning measures and actions by Israel affecting the status of the City of Jerusalem, Having heard the statements of the parties con­ concerned on the question, Noting that since the adoption of the above-men­ tioned resolutions Israel has taken further measures tending to change the status of the City of Jerusalem, Reafjirming the established principle that acquisi­ tion of territory by military conquest is inadmissible, 1. Rea/jinns its resolution 252 ( 1968); 2. Deplores the failure of Israel to show any regard for the resolutions of the General Assembly and the Security Council mentioned above; 3. Censures in the strongest terms all measures taken to change the status of the City of Jerusalem; 4. Confirms that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken by Israel which purport to alter the status of Jerusalem, including expropriation of land and properties thereon, are invalid and cannot change that status; 5. Urgently calls once more upon Israel to rescind forthwith all measures taken by it which may tend to change the status of the City of Jerusalem, and in future to refrain from all actions likely to have such an effect; 6. Requests Israel to inform the Security Council without any further delay of its intentions with regard to the implementation of the provisions of the present resolution; 7. Determines that, in the event of a negative re­ sponse or no response from Israel, the Security Council shall reconvene without delay to consider what further action should be taken in this matter; 8. Requests the Secretary-General to report to the Security Council on the implementation of the present resolution. Adopted unanimously at the 1485th meeting. Decision At its 1498th meeting, on 13 August 1969, the Council decided to invite the representatives of Lebanon and Israel to participate, without vote, in 
analysis: This text appears to be a diplomatic resolution related to a specific issue, namely the status of Jerusalem, and the actions taken by Israel that are seen as altering that status. The language used is formal and diplomatic, with a focus on international law and the decisions of the United Nations. The resolution is also concerned with the actions and intentions of Israel, which suggests that the category may be related to international relations or politics.