text: fulfil their mandate." He hoped that the draft decision, as revised, would be adopted by consensus. 2. Mrs. DAES asked to become a sponsor of the revised draft decision. 3. Tbe revised draft decision E/CN.4/Sub.2/1990/L.48 was adopted without a vote. Question of the violation of human rights and fundamental freedoms, including policies of racial discrimination and segregation and of apartheid, in all countries, with particular reference to colonial and other dependent countries and territories: report of the Sub-Commission under Commission on Human Rights resolution 8 (XXIII) (agenda item 6) (continued) (E/CN.4/Sub.2/1990/L.l9, 21, 23, 24, 32, 34 and 35) Draft resolution E/GN.4/Sub.2/1990/L.l9 4. Mrs. DAES, introducing the draft resolution, said that the Sub-Commission would pay a tribute in the draft resolution to the memory of Professor Kazem Rajavi who had been assassinated a few months earlier in Switzerland. Professor Rajavi had been a dedicated human rights defender and activist who had made a considerable contribution to the work of the United Nations in the field of human rights. No knowledge was available as to who had assassinated him. But in operative paragraph 2, the Sub-Commission would strongly condemn all asssassinations for political purposes. The Special Representative, Mr. Galindo Pohl, would be invited to include in his next report any information available to him on the investigation of the assassination. 5. She expressed the hope that the draft resolution would be adopted without a vote. 6. Mr. CISSE (Secretary of the Sub-Commission) said that the name of Mrs. Bautista should be deleted from the list of sponsors. 7. Mr. CAREY said that he supported the draft resolution whole-heartedly but would like to add the words "or threat of assassination" in operative paragraph 2 after "every assassination" and the words "or other persons" after "dissidents" in the same paragraph. E/CN.4/Sub.2/l990/SR.34 page 3 
analysis: This text appears to be a report from a United Nations Commission on Human Rights, discussing a draft resolution related to human rights violations, apartheid, and assassinations. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting a formal discussion or meeting within the UN framework. The topics being discussed are highly political and socially sensitive, indicating a focus on human rights and international relations.