text: self-defence is very far from that in international law. Without surprise, because we ha$e unfortunately become accustomed to the escalation of arrogance and cynicism and the improper equation of liberation movements with terrorism that some circles try to impose on us, while mod- estly covering their faces when we dare to speak about State terrorism. 21. At the beginning of my statement I said that our : 17. Yet that is what is involved when a country which calls itself a responsible State fails to realize the limits of its power in an orderly society and indulges in aggression and adventurism, scorning the sovereignty and territorial integ- rity of other States. Such an attitude deserves nothing but strong condemnation, for it constitutes a flagrant violation of the Charter of the United Nations, the rules of intema- tional law and the principles governing relations between States under the Charter. appeals had been rejected and our condemnations had had no result because Israel had chosen to ignore them. The growing and ever more worrying impunity enjoyed by Israel is not unconnected with that fact, and we have the right to ask whether the time has not come, in view of Israel’s repeated use of the threat or use of force and its refusal to comply with its obligations under Article 25 of the Charter, to consider the adoption against Israel of appropriate measures provided for in the Charter, includ- ing Chapter VII. We did that in resolution 566 (1985) with regard to Namibia. The case that we are considering today is not very different, and our authority and credibility are at stake. 18. We find it difficult to find any sufficient justifi&on for Israel’s armed aggression against Tunisia, planned and carried out in cold blood. It has been argued that since it 
analysis: The text appears to be a statement or speech by a representative of a country or organization, condemning Israel's actions and calling for measures to be taken under international law. The language used is formal and diplomatic, with references to international agreements and the Charter of the United Nations. The topic is not related to any specific economic, social, or environmental issue, but rather to international relations, state sovereignty, and the use of force.