text: Commission on Human Rights should be spaced at greater intervals, with a view to allowing delegations a longer period for reflection. In that connection, his delegation would appreciate a statement from the representative of the Secretary-General of any possible financial savings, and if there were none, an explanation of why not. 19. Mr. MURRAY (United Kingdom) said that his delegation attached great importanc., to the work of the united Nations in the field of human rights, in particular that of the Centre for Human Rights. He noted that the cost of certain subsidiary organs of the Commission on Human Rights had been excluded from the proposed programme budget pending the renewal of their mandates. If all those mandates wer~ renewed, the extra cost might be as much as $2 million. He understood that it was difficult for the drafters of the budget to make assumptions regarding the renewal or otherwise of such mandates, but he felt that the exclusion of those costs meant that expenditure was significantly understated in section 23. In other parts of the budget, such assumptions had been made in advance of expected decisions by the General Assembly. An indication of the probable cost of some of the non-recurrent items indicated in section 23 would have been useful. 20. In connection with the proposal in paragraph 23.15 to transfer a post from tt,., New York Liaison Office, he said that his delegation considered that the Office played a significant role in the work of the Centre for Human Rights and was concerned that it was apparently being downgraded. His delegation hoped, therefore, that the Liaison Office's former status could be restored through redeployment. With regard to the recommendation about the Working Group on Slavery, his delegation shared the concern expressed by the Australian delegation and agreed that the Working Group's operations should be reviewed by the commissi0:. 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the budget and operations of the United Nations, specifically the Commission on Human Rights and its subsidiary organs. The discussion centers around the costs of certain programs and the potential impact of renewing mandates for those programs. The text also mentions the role of the Centre for Human Rights and the New York Liaison Office.