text: Australia, Burkina Faso, China, Denmark, Egypt, France, India, Madagascar, Peru, Thailand, Trinidad and Tobago, Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United States of America. Provisional agenda (S/Agenda/2586) 1. Adoption of the agenda 2. The situation in Namibia: (a) Letter dated 23 May 1985 from the Permanent Representative of India to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Coun- cil (S/17213); (6) Letter dated 23 May 1985 from the.Permanent Representative of Mozambique to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Secu- rity Council (S/I 7222); (c) Further report of the Secretary-General con- cerning the implementation of Security Council resolutions 435 (1978) and 439 (1978) concern- ing the question of Namibia (S/17242) The meeting was called to order at 11.15 a.m. Adoption of the agenda The agenda was adopted The situation in Namibia: (4 (4 (4 1. Letter dated 23 May 1985 from the Permanent Repre- sentative of India to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council (S/17213); Letter dated 23 May 1985 from the Permanent Repre- sentative of Mozambique to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council (S/17222); Further report of the Secretary-General concerning the implementation of Security Council resolutions 435 (1978) and 439 (1978) concerning the question of Namibia (S/17242) The PRESIDENT: In accordance with the decision taken at the 2583rd meeting, I invite the representative of Liberia to take a place at the Council table. At the invitation of the President, Mr. Kofa (Liberia) took a place at the Court&l table. 2. The PRESIDENT: In accordance with the decision taken at the 2583rd meeting, I invite the Acting President of the United Nations Council for Namibia and the other 
analysis: The text appears to be a meeting record of the United Nations Security Council, discussing the situation in Namibia. The focus is on international politics and diplomacy, with no mention of economic development, natural resources, or environmental issues. The language used is formal and diplomatic, indicating that the discussion is centered around international relations and conflict resolution.