text: At the same time, adddiary organ8 that receive meeting reeorde were asked to avoid iocluding surnmarierr of diocussions in theft roports, wless such summaries were indispeeSs.ble as part of the elomeats described in rubparagraphs (~9, (b) and (~3) sbeve, by referring ioatead to the rePwant meeting records (para, 139. 39. fa 8ectioa II, paragraph 5, of it5 resolution 361117 A of 10 Deco&or 1981, and again in paragraph 14 Of it8 r68OhtiOtr 37114 C Of 16 ESo~Omber 1982, th0 General A88embly reque5tod it5 5ub8fdfsry oogano to en8uro that their report5 Should bo 88 brief as QOSSfblO Md ehould not oxccrod the desirable limit of 32 Qagor. Subsidiary orqaar whoso reports exceeded 32 page5 were asked. in ,-r-9-r*,r *-,-a. c) ------b-c- .m h-1 .1 LSPYLYCIVY a.6 A% C, yI‘oy‘Qy”s l 3 aJAY A”, TV e~~i~.ta ‘~~lr ~~8~~.e~Qi;~ce iii~ LSIot request to the Committee on Coafereaces , which was to report to the kss~mbly at its thirty-efqhtb ae55ion, malia, on measures to improve the implemeatation of the 3&Q%CJO rule. fnr Qaragraph S of its resolution 431222 C, the Aaatmbly again requested that subsidiary org6nS should strive to keep their reports to the A585mbly within the desirable limit of 32 pages. / . . . iVlMFI4Wl Englirh Page 14 40. The General Auremb'ly, in it8 deciriou 07/445 of 21 becomber 1982, endorred the recommendation8 contained in the annex to Economic and Social Council rerolution 1902150 of 28 July 1982, in which guidelines wefa ertablished for reports of subsidtary ofgaas to the Assemblly aad the Counc.il. These concern the content8 of report8 a8 well as rationalitation of the reporting procedure8 to be followed. II. Seakiug to eanure the production of concise report8, the General Atsembly in rerolution 38/32 B invited it8 rub,idiaty organs to include in their agenda8 aa 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the reporting procedures and guidelines for subsidiary organizations to the United Nations General Assembly, specifically regarding the content and length of reports. The language used is formal and technical, suggesting a focus on administrative or bureaucratic matters rather than specific economic or social issues.