text: because tbey are inconpatible eith its object and purpose. 2. Indeed. these reaervationa, it inplenented, rould inevitably result indiscrlninat.ion against oomen on the basiB of sex, uhich is contrary to the entireintent of the convention. The prlncipres of eguality beteeen men and ronen and non-d iscr i.ninalion on the bagis of sex, rrhich are enshrined in the second Preanbular paragraph and Article 1, paragraph 3, of tbe Charter of the UnltedNations, to uhich Mauritius is a signatory, and in article3 2 and 15 of theUniversal Declaration ot Hunan Rlghts of 1948, eere previously accepted by the Governnent of Maurltlus when it acceded, on 12 DecenbeE L973, to the Covenant on Econornic, SociaL and Cultural Righta. The above principlea were stated inarllcle 2, paragraph 2, and article 3 of the latter. Consequently, it isinconsistent rrith these contractual obllgations prevlously assumed by 0auritius forits Governnent nory to claim that it baa reservations, on the sane subject, aboutthe 1979 Convention, 3. The objection of, the Governnent of ltexico to the reservations in quescion shourd not be interpreted as inpeding the entry into force of the 1979 convention beCaeen l4ex ico and Mauritius. OB.]ECTION BY iIEXI@ TO RESBRIATIONS irADE BY THE REPUBLIC OF KOBAA UPON ACCESSION IOriginrl! spanish] [6 June 19851 t. The Governnent of the united I'terican states has studled Ehe content of thereservatlona nade by the Republic of Korea to article 9 aftd to article ld,paragraphs I (c), I (d), f (f), and I (9), of the Convention, and has concludedthat they should be consldered invalid in the light of article 28, paragraph 2, ofthe Convention, because Chey are lnconpatible oith its object and purpose.A/40/623 EngIiBh Page 15 2. Indeed the reservations in questi.on, if pu! into practice. would inevitablyresult in discrinination agains! lromen on the bagis of sex, uhich is contrary to
analysis: The text appears to be a diplomatic document discussing the reservations made by the Republic of Korea to the 1979 Convention, specifically regarding the treatment of women. The language used is formal and technical, indicating a high-level legal or administrative context. The text does not mention economic development, natural resources, or environmental issues, but rather focuses on human rights and equality.