text: 9 July 1991 - UW docuu~~t A/40/491. A/40/6 36 s/l7464 Enqlish Page 11 declares itself purportly ‘ready to negotiate’ a political solution. This new stand reflects the increasing difficulties encountered by the Hanoi’s authorities in Kampuohed, in Vietanm itself and on the international arena. Nonetheless , this is only a political manoeuvre aimed at splitting the national unity within the Coalition Government of Democratic Kampuchea and its near or far friends, and at sowing confusion within the international com- munity. As a matter of fact, Vietnam demands the dissolution of the National Amy of Democratic Kampuchea who are now at the gates of the capital, the exclusion of some party and personalities of the Coalition Government of Democratic Kampuchea from the negotiations and elect ions which would be held only under the framework of the so-called ‘aonatititiont’ of the puppet re- gime in Phnom Penh. This demand reminds us of the similar one made by the Apartheid regime in South Africa with regard to Namibia l . . “, . , , one may ask of what right --if not the right of the jungle-- does Vietnam dispose to impose those conditions? In fact, that is but a ma- noeuvre aimed at making people forget the root cause of the problem of Kampu- chea which is the Vietnamese invasion and occupation of Kampuchea and thereby disregarding its logical solution that is the total withdrawal of the Vietna- mese forces from Kampuchea, Vietnam hopes to obtain by diplomatic means what it cannot by military means, The Vietnamese tactics change but they always aim at the same objective.“(?O) 23. “, , . I would like to ask what right do wt. have to eliminate Pal Pot or 1eng Sary? Do you think the Kampuchean people hate Pol Pot? 
analysis: The text appears to be a political analysis of the situation in Kampuchea (now Cambodia) in 1991, discussing the Vietnamese invasion and occupation, the Coalition Government of Democratic Kampuchea, and the negotiations and demands made by Vietnam. The text also references the National Amy of Democratic Kampuchea and the personalities involved in the conflict. The tone is critical of Vietnam's demands and suggests that they are an attempt to split the national unity and impose conditions that are not relevant to the root cause of the problem.