text: met today urgently to consider the question of the recent acts of aggression by the racist regime of South Africa against the People’s Republic of Angola. 76. Just three months ago, on 20 June, the Council strongly condemned South Africa for its act of aggression against Angola and the gross violation of the sovereignty and territorial integrity of that country. It further strongly condemned South Africa for its utilization of the Territory of Namibia as a springboard for perpetrating its armed attacks against Angola, and demanded that South Africa should unconditionally withdraw forthwith all its occupa- tion forces from Angola, that it cease all acts of aggression and scrupulously respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the People’s Republic of Angola. 77. Thus, the Council clearly and firmly stated its atti- tude to the aggressive actions by the racist regime of Preto- ria and, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, described them as a threat to international peace and security. 78. How did Pretoria react to that clear condemnation of its actions by the Security Council, the body of the United Nations primarily responsible for the maintenance of inter- national peace and security? Not only did it disregard that decision by the Council, not only did it not put an end to its policy of aggression against independent Angola, but it significantly increased the scale of its aggressive war against that neighbouring sovereign country. . 79. Continuing the policy of State terrorism and armed intervention against its sovereign neighbours, the military 7 cliaue of South Africa and its regular troops, with the support of its air force, again viilated the borders of Angola and made incursions deep into Angola’s territory and airspace. The armed forces of South Africa are con- ducting hostilities against the people’s army of Angola in 
analysis: This text appears to be a diplomatic statement or a report on a political issue, specifically regarding the conflict between South Africa and Angola. The language used is formal and official, suggesting a high-level document or a speech. The text focuses on the actions of the South African government, their aggression against Angola, and the reactions of the United Nations. This suggests that the topic is not related to economic or social development, but rather to international relations and conflict resolution.