text: lic of Angola, who are once again being subjected to the outrage and savagery of Pretoria’s brutality, we offer our deepest sympathies ,and feelings of solidarity, for their suffering is our suffering and their death is indeed our death. 21. The Security Council has been seized of the ques- tion of South Africa’s aggression against the People’s Republic of Angola since 1976. During the intervening period the Council has made a series of solemn declara- tions and statements demanding that racist South Africa cease its provocative armed invasions of Angolan terri- tory. In its resolution 428 (1978), in particular, the Council solemnly warned that, in the event of further acts of violation of the sovereignty and territorial integ- rity of Angola, the Council would meet again “in order to consider the adoption of more effective measures, in accordance with the appropriate provisions of the Char- ter of the United Nations, including Chapter VII thereof ‘. 22. Seven years have passed since the adoption of resolu- tion 428 (1978), and yet racist South Africa’s troops are still occupying southern Angola. The Pretoria regime not only has intensified its campaign of terror and genocide in Angola, but has drawn the whole of southern Africa into a vortex of violence that now has very serious consequences for the stability of the region and international peace and security as a whole. 23. One is tempted to ask, what more must the Pretoria regime do before the members of the Council recognize the threat that it represents in our region? How much longer are the members of the Council going to be indifferent about a regime that has violated all norms of international behaviour, including all that the United Nations stands for? HOW much longer is the Council going to be satisfied with mere pronouncements and platitudes, when scores of 
analysis: The text appears to be a diplomatic statement or a speech, likely from a representative of a country or organization, condemning the actions of South Africa and its impact on Angola. The language used is formal and diplomatic, with a focus on international law and the actions of the United Nations Security Council. The text does not mention specific economic, social, or environmental issues, but rather focuses on the political and humanitarian aspects of the conflict.