text: fundamentally null and void, whatever time has elapsed*, binding the PLO to destroy a Uember State of the united Rations. The z.hi ted Nations, the Organization created to raaintain international. peace and security, to develop friendly relations between nations , to be the centre for harmcnizing the aCtiOnf3 Of natiOnS, allow8 the PLO leader to use this forum and Call, if not in 80 many words, for the destruction of Israel. Having incited the violence and inflamed it as far as possible in the aftermath of the Rishon Le-Zion tragedy, the PLO now convenes the Security Council. bo aondemn Israel for putting it down. Wtth the exception of one or tuo representatives , all membeco of the Sccur ity Council who have spoken so far have called only on Israel to act with restraint. They have not caiied on tie Paiee tininnti LG ceaa~ the rioting or z t!e Poe c-5 cease itF act.8 of terror , murder and intense incitement . Any other State in Xarael’8 situation would act resOlut@ly to contain ou& violence. Did anyone ~a11 on J0rda1-1 to act with restraint as the Palestinian riots were put doW3 with force last week? JP/jf s/w. 2926 17 (Mr. Eein, Israel) Evidently every act perpetrated by Arab madmen and terrorists is greeted with tolerance and understanding: the kidnapping of civilians in Lebanar; bombing sprees in crouded Jerusalem markets; the stabbings oE Israeli civilians throughout Israel; and the repeated terrorist infiltrations , the latest being the PLO infiltraticm attempt by speedbwts sent from Libya to commit mass murder cn crowded beaches in 1 srael . Such leniency is aleo the norm with international terror by the PLO and other Palestinian grwps. Instead of uniting in a struggle to eliminate indiscriminate terror, the murder of uninvolved civil ians, the international 
analysis: This text appears to be a speech or statement criticizing the United Nations and the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) for their handling of a specific situation, likely related to Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The language used is inflammatory and accusatory, with the author blaming the PLO and the UN for inciting violence and not taking adequate action to stop terrorism. The text does not discuss any specific economic, environmental, or scientific issues, but rather focuses on political and ideological differences.