text: of the People’s Republic of Angola”, the South African air force carried out raids into Angolan territory in support of racist soldiers who had come to the aid of the UNITA puppets who were experiencing difficulties as a result of the advance of Angolan Government troops. The facts, as reported by the representative of Angola and by the press, are serious: about 60 soldiers of the people’s liberation armed forces were killed and six helicopters were shot down. 59. South Africa’s latest act of aggression against Angola is one part of the well-known hostile policy of the racist regime of Pretoria towards the independent African States of the region. To entrench its domination in southern Africa, South Africa has committed many acts of sabotage and political and economic destabilization. It is supplying financial and military assistance to so-called liberation movements ,which are fully in its pay and to dissident groups to enable them to attempt to overthrow the legiti- mate Governments, whether of Angola, Mozambique, Bo- tswana or Lesotho. All this is crowned by the systematic use of direct military aggression against these countries. All these measures of intimidation unquestionably consti- tute aggression within the meaning of article 3 of the Defi- nition of Aggression annexed to General Assembly resolu- tion 3314 (XXIX), and pose a real threat to peace and security in the region, and hence in the world. 60. Whatever South Africa’s explanations in its attempt to justify its latest act of aggression, there is no doubt that it has yet again carried out a flagrant violation of the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Angola. The racist regime’s arrogance and hypocrisy pass beyond tolerable limits when we hear its representative insult the wisdom of the Council and dictate to us the conditions for Angolan national reconciliation and for the withdrawal of foreign 
analysis: The text appears to be a formal document, likely a speech or a resolution, discussing a conflict between countries. The language used is formal and diplomatic, and the content focuses on the actions of one country (South Africa) against another (Angola). The text does not mention economic development, natural resources, industry, transport, communication, health, education, employment, humanitarian aid, or culture. It does, however, touch on international relations, security, and sovereignty, which suggests that the most fitting category is likely related to international relations.