text: 34. The reaction of the security council ,"as expressed on two occasio[s. Thefirst ".as itr resorutioD s4r (r9s3) of 1g Novenber 1983. The security councirstat€d its "corcern" at the Declaratio!, ',considered., that the Declaiatiou was"inconpatible trith the 1960 rr€aty concerniag the establishment of the Repubric ofcyPrus ald the 1960 rr€aty of Guarastee", "diprorect ... the purported s.ceasion ofPart of tbe Republ'ic of crrrrus" and coucruded that the Declaratron xas ,,rega!.lyinvalltl", qalled for lts withdrawal atra cal1ed upon al1 scates not to recogaize anyClTrriot State other tha! the RepubLic of Clprus. 1?. The second Security Councit resolution, attopted si nonths later otr11 May 1984, was resoJ.ution 550 (1984). After declaiing in its preambular part theconcern of the Security Council at Ehe ,'further secessionist act;n lt "condemns al1 secessionist actlons, includitg the purported exctrang€ ofarnbassadors betueen Turh€y and the ?urkish clpriot reattership, ileciares theniLlegal antt invalid aad calls for their innediate withdrawali.A/44/96S S12l463 English Page11 Laterinthestatement theSecretary-General alsosaid: "Thepolitical equality ofthetwoconununities inandthebi-communal nature ofthefederation needtobeacknowledged. Whilepolitical equality doesnot meanequalnumerical participation inallfederal government branches and administration, itshould bereflected interaliainvarious ways:.••andin theequality andidentical powers andfunctions ofthetwofederated states." (il2.i.!l.) 32.Mostrecently. theSecurity Council. initsresolution of12March1990 (649(1990» called upon "theleaders ofthetwocommunities topursuetheirefforts toreachfreely a mutually acceptable solution providing fortheestablishment ofafederation thatwillbebi-communal asregards theconstitutional aspects andbi-zonal as regards theterritorial aspects inlinewiththepresent resolution andtheir 1977and1979high-level agreements. andtoco-operate, onanequalfooting, withtheSecretary-General incompleting. inthefirstinstance andonan urgentbasis, anoutline ofanoverall agreement, asagreedinJune19S9". PARTII.THEESTABLISIlMENT OFTHETRNCANaSECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS 541(19S3) ANa550(1986) 33.On15November 19S3theestablishment oftheTRNCasanindependent Statewas declared bytheTurkish Cypriot people. Thistookastepfurther theprocess of separate political identificationcof theTurkish Cypriot community thathadbeen initiated on13February 1975by~heproclamation oftheTFSC. Thedifference now wasthat,whereas theTFSCwasessentially arestructuring "oftheautonomous Turkish Cypriot administration" (seethestatement ofMr.Denktas issued on 13February 1975)thathadcomeintobeingintheperiodsincethesubversion of theConstitution bytheGreekCypriots inDecember 1963.andmadenoformalclaim toindependence, theTRNCwasdeclared tobeanindependent State. 34.Thereaction oftheSecurity Council wasexpressed ontwooccasions. The firstwasinresolution 541(19S3)oflSNovember 19S3. TheSecurity Council statedits"concern" attheDeclaration, IIconsidered" thattheDeclaration was "incompatible withthe1960Treatyconcerning theestablishment oftheRepublic of Cyprus andthe1960TreatyofGuarantee". "deplored .,.thepurported secession of partoftheRepublic ofCyprus" andconcluded thattheDeclaration was"legally
analysis: The text appears to be discussing a political issue, specifically the declaration of independence by the Turkish Cypriot community and the reaction of the Security Council. It mentions treaties, resolutions, and the recognition of states, indicating a focus on international relations and politics.