text: future, we are talking about security arrangements to shield the islanders against any threat of renewed aggression. That is all. 101. Mr. TROYANOVSKY (Union of Soviet So- cialist Republics) (int~~rpretution jkm Russirrn): First of all, Sir, I should like most sincerely to congratulate you on your assumption of the presidency of the Council for this month. The Soviet delegation would fike to assure you of its willingness to co-operate with you as you discharge this difficult duty, We should also like to pay a due tribute to your predecessor, the representative of the People’s Republic of China, who discharged his duties as President during the month of May in an extremely professional manner. 102. The Council is meeting again today to consider the dangerous military conflict in the South Atlantic. When on 26 May it adopted resolution 505 (1982) on a cease-fire and peaceful settlement of the conflict in the region of the Falkland Islands (Islas MaIviaas). the Council proceeded from the premise that this reso- lution should lead to the restoration of peace. To that end, the Council instructed the Secretary-General once again to undertake a mission of good offices, and it called on the parties to the conflict to co-operate fully with the Secretary-Genera1 with a view to the cessation of hostilities in and around the islands. 103. However, as can be seen from the report sub- mitted today by the Secretary-General, his efforts for a settlement of the conflict and the removal of this hotbed of armed confrontation have once again been blocked, 104. It must be said that the members of the Council could not but have been alerted by the statement that the representative of the United Kingdom made immediately after the Council adopted resolution 505 (1982) [2368th mwing]. 105. At that time, the British representative virtually 
analysis: The text appears to be a transcript of a meeting of the United Nations Security Council, discussing a conflict in the South Atlantic region, specifically the Falkland Islands. The language used is formal and diplomatic, indicating a focus on international relations, politics, and security. The text does not mention economic development, natural resources, or environmental issues, and the discussion is not about specific industries or transportation systems.