text: 88. The Special Committee considered the question of St. Helena at its 1383rd meeting, on 1 August 1990. 87. During its consideration of the item, the Special Committee had before it a working paper prepared by the Secretariat containing information on developments concerning the Territory (A/AC.109/1018). 88. At the 1383rd meeting, on 1 August, the Rapporteur of the Sub-Committee on Small Territories introduced the report of the Sub-Committee (A/AC.109/L.1732), containing an account of its consideration of the Territory (A/AC.109/PV.1383). 89. At the same meeting, the representative of Tunisia, in his capacity as Chairman of the Sub-Committee on Small Territories, made a statement (A/AC.109/PV.1383). Decision of the Special Committee 70. At its 1383rdmeeting, on 1 August 1990, following a statement by the representative of Norway (A/AC.109/PV.1383), the Special Committee adopted the report of the Sub-Committee on Small Territories and endorsed the conclusions and recommendations contained therein, it being understood that the reservations expressed by members would be reflected in the record of the meeting. The te^t of the conclusions and recommendations is reproduced below (see also para. 115, draft decision II); (1) The Special Committee reaffirms the inalienable right of the people of St. Helena to self-determination and independence in conformity with the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples, contained in General Assembly resolution 1514 (XV) of 14 December 1980. -23-(2) The Special Committee urges the administering Power, in consultation with the Legislative Council and other representatives of the people of St. Helena, to continue to take all necessary steps to ensure the speedy implementation of the Declaration with respect to the Territory and, in that connection, reaffirms the importance of promoting an awareness among the people of St. Helena of the possibilities open to them in the exercise of their right to self-determination. 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing a territory (St. Helena) and the rights of its people to self-determination and independence. The language used is formal and official, suggesting that it may be related to international diplomacy or politics. The mention of a declaration and a resolution also suggests a formal, legal context. Given these hints, it seems likely that the category related to politics or international relations would be a good fit.