text: Since the Sub-Commission was already independent, he was opposed to any text directly calling for its independence. However, with the increased number of sensitive matters to be dealt with, guarantees must be strengthened. That was all he was seeking to do. The Commission had become aware of the situation, because since 1946 it had gradually strengthened the independence of members of the Sub-Commission. It had decided, for instance, that alternates should be elected and should serve in a personal capacity. Also, the decision which the International Court of Justice had taken in 1989 was in keeping with what he was suggesting. It stressed that members of the Sub-Commission must have guarantees of their independence and must enjoy privileges and immunities in order to achieve the objectives of the United Nations. 67. In some cases the public manifestation of opinion had perhaps a stronger impact on the State concerned than a secret ballot, but difficulties, sometimes physical, had been experienced by several members of the Sub-Commission in the past; for example, collegues from Syria and Argentina had disappeared, and Mr. Mazilu had not been able to return to Geneva. He himself always took great care to consult with government observers, if possible in public, but he would like relations to be progressively moralized. Secret voting would help and would also promote better relations with the non-governmental organizations. He hoped that the Sub-Commission would support his motion, although he fully respected all those who did not share his point of view. 68. Mr. ALFONSO MARTINEZ, speaking on a point of order, requested a Spanish text of Mr, Joinet's proposal. He had only an unofficial text in French. 69. The CHAIRMAN observed that rule 78 of the rules of procedure did not 
analysis: The text appears to be a discussion about the independence and guarantees of members of a sub-commission, likely within the United Nations. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting that it may be a debate or discussion about a resolution or proposal. The context seems to be related to the functioning of the sub-commission, rather than a specific policy or project related to one of the 12 categories.