text: "consideration of information requirements and of the practical problems involved in determining and using indicators leads to the conclusion that selectivity must be the keynote. More will be gained by selecting a small nvunber of relevant indicators for which a country can obtain the information within its resources than by aiming at comprehensiveness. Also it is better to accept some imperfections in the accuracy of the information than expend imdue efforts on precision". 62/ Fifthly, indicator selection must be based on a regularized methodology upon which all choices are based. Sixthly, indicators for use in the Ьгшап rights organs of the United Nations will require the greatest degree of disaggregation currently possible. Seventh and finally, the indicators chosen should provide: (a) overall national measurements with as substantial a regional or international comparability as possible; and (b) regional measurements within the coimtry at the State, provincial, city, town, rural and local levels. 89. With these seven basic assumptions specified, the Special Rapporteur suggests that the first stage of indicator usage by human rights bodies be based on the following core indicators, chosen on the basis of: (a) the seven above assumptions; (b) general and current availability; (c) general comparability over time and between countries; (d) direct relevance to the norms of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other relevant legal texts; (e) reliance upon the indicator by several agencies; and (f) the direct relationship between the indicator and at least one United Nations Agency. The indicators are: (1) Under-five mortality rate; (2) Per capita GNP for the poorest 40 per cent of the population (including the existence of a "poverty line" and criteria for this line); (3) The Physical Quality of Life Index (PQLI); йД/ (4) Overall literacy rate; (5) Access to primary health care;
analysis: The text discusses the selection of indicators for monitoring human rights, specifically focusing on economic and social rights. The indicators mentioned are related to healthcare, education, and poverty, which suggests that the category should be related to human well-being and development. Additionally, the text mentions the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, which further supports the idea that the category should be related to human rights and development.