text: Secretary-Genacal help us determine the nature Of the ccisia, which we believe ie political, institutional and financial, and in eotabliehing once and for all where the reewnsi bili:y 1 ies. S/W.29213 24-25 Nr. Eepos, Greece) W, must acknowledge the political nature of the deadlmk which the Secretary-General has brouqht to our attention. The Secretary-General informs us that, by the terms of the Security Council resolutions and the high-level aWeWnts concluded in 1977 and 1979, his missi.on of q& offices has been challenqed by one of the tw interlocutors. During the recant talks, the head of the Turkish Cypriot oomnunity attempted to inttoduce criteria which were not merely a question of emantics or teeminoloqy but 8 matter of substance; in that way he owosed the unity, soveteiqnty and territorial inteqrity of the Republic of Cyprus, of which the Security Council is a quarantor . Aspirations with no legal basis were Put Eorwa rd. The Secretary-General, whose aw~clusions were not limited to the causes of ths ~01Lapse of the recent talks, formally and unequivocally stated who Was responsible for it. It was Mr. Denktash, who, as we all kmw, relying on the Turki& army of occupation , not only disregards United Nations CeSolUtiOnS reaffirming the unity, independence and territorial inteqrity of the Republic of Cyprus, but also makes IB commitment to respect the hiqh-level aqreaments of which he is a siqnatorv. There is often talk about te-establishing trust between the two cgnxnunities, and it seams that there have been some contacts and other initiatives in that area, despite the problems and obstacles introduced by the head of the Turkish Cypriot community. NE1/6 S/PV. 2928 26 (NC. Zepos, Greece1 At meetings held throuqh the hospitality of the Secretary-GzneraL the President of the Republic of Cyorus, Mr. Vassiliou, has availed himseLf of the 
analysis: The text appears to be a diplomatic document discussing a specific conflict or issue between two parties, the Republic of Cyprus and the Turkish Cypriot community. The language used is formal and technical, indicating a high-level discussion or debate. The text mentions the Secretary-General, the Security Council, and resolutions, which suggests that the issue is related to international relations and diplomacy.