text: VII. Possible sore indicatQm. for use . towards. the realization of economic, social and cultural rights 87. As a starting-point, it must be recalled that the field of social indicators is in a relatively constant state of flux; reorientations and new perceptions of the use, type, scope and validity of indicators is a constantly changing and thus d 3mamic process. What is offered here is therefore subject to further thought and discussion. 88. Several basic assumptions should be made in any methodological analysis aiming at developing possible core indicators. Firstly, it is crucial that indicators be viewed holistically as comprising an entire set of concerns. Although a perfect overall picture with a high degree of international comparability is impossible to obtain, at least an attempt should be made in that direction. This should not be interpreted as precluding the practical necessity that some relative indicators will need to be employed for countries at different stages of development or that precise, appropriate and sophisticated indicators should be prioritized over less "ideal" indicators. Secondly, any use of core indicators or development thereof must be consistent with both the obligations inherent in a certain right, and the entitlements involved. The availability of valid indicators can assist with the derivation of the "minimum core requirements" attached to a right but it cannot offer everything. In many ways, a focus upon the entitlements side of discourse surrounding economic, social and cultural rights may be more feasible and advantageous in the context of indicator usage. Thirdly, indicators, whether core or otherwise, maintain many imperfect aspects. This must be neither forgotten nor over-emphasized. Fourthly, a great deal of careful selectivity must be employed in choosing core indicators. The various criteria discussed above will need to be incorporated into crucial choices. It has been stated elsewhere that:
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the development of indicators for measuring economic, social, and cultural rights, with a focus on the importance of holistic approaches, consistency with international obligations, and careful selectivity in choosing core indicators. This suggests that the text is related to the broader context of human development and the measurement of societal well-being.