text: 242 (1967), we support Egypt and other Arab countries occupied by Israel in their legitimate struggle to recover the entirety of their territory. We set up the committee made up of 10 heads of State which I just mentioned to help find a solution to the problem and to contribute to the safeguarding of the legitimate rights of the Palestinian people in accordance with the responsibilities arising from the fundamental principles of the Organization of African Unity and the United Nations. The heads of African States met at Addis Ababa and agreed to continue to support Egypt and other occupied Arab countries until their entire territory, which was occupied in June 1967, was liberated. 111. The search for an agreement among the parties was the subject of various initiatives. Members will recall the unsuccessful attempt by the United States to reach a provisional agreement on the reopening of the Suez Canal, as called for by United Nations resolutions. The year 197 1, like the preceding years, was marked by a lack of progress towards a settlement of the conflict in the Middle East, However, in resolution 2799 (XXVI) on the situation in the Middle East, the General Assembly at its twenty-sixth session expressed itself as follows: [The speaker read paragraphs 4 to 7 of resolution 2799 (XXVI).] 112. It is deplorable that no progress of the kind advocated by the United Nations has been made. The Secretary.General confirmed this in his report of 15 Sep- tember 1972 to the twenty-seventh session of the General Assembly, when he stated: “In spite of our continued efforts, it has not been possible to make any substantial progress. As can be seen from published statements of the parties, an agreed basis for discussions under Ambassador Jarring’s auspices does not seem to exist at the present time”. /S/ZO792, 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing international politics and conflicts, specifically the Arab-Israeli conflict and the efforts of the United Nations to find a solution. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting that the text is an official document or a speech. The focus on international relations, territorial disputes, and the actions of the United Nations also suggests that the text is related to politics rather than any of the other categories.