text: possible to lay the foundations for better international co-operation. Mm Am/ew. 19 87 ‘Phe Wmwma (interpretation from ~rencb)r ~ba observer of tha Palestine Liberation Srganfzation has aoked to cpeak An reply to a statement made by Ona Of the representatives in the general debete. I propose to allow him to make a statement in reply in accordance with General AsSeaDbly WWhtion 9237 [%X1%), of 22 November 1974, and with the decision of the President of the thirty-first session and precedent6 established in similar circumstance6 at earlier rreueions. I call on the Observer of the Palestine Liberation Grganiaation. Mr. MANSOUR (Palestine Liberation Qcganfeation (PLO)) (interpretation from Ae abic) : At thi@ morning’s rueetfng one of the leaders of international brroriam spoke before this Assembly - Yitzak Shamir, a terrorist whose infamous history datee back to well bedore 1948, when he wae wanted for criminal acts. NOW ha is practising official terrorisra frcxn the apex of the Govermrimt of fsrael. Shamir claimed that Israel seeks peece, TR4 whole wxld fw33?s the truth of the position and practices of Israel, whiah run counter to peace and consist in waging ware and cazrying out acts of deetouctfsn and aggreesion against our Palestinian people and other Arab peoples in the region. The latest epfscde in thio ceiminal series of aggressive act8 wa8 againslt our sister Tunisia and the headquarters of the PLO in TUniS, This criminal act has been denounced throughout the world and, in particular, in the meeting6 of the security Council that began this mOrnfng. IBrael’S claim that it seek6 peace is absolutely cynical because all its praCticei BgiPfnet the Palestinian people affirm the reverse) they affirm aggreesion and fascism against our people and the Arab peopleo, Ths war of lsPB2 againot AW/at A/lObPV. 19 68 
analysis: The text appears to be a statement made by a representative of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) in the context of a United Nations General Assembly meeting. The content focuses on the political situation in the Middle East, specifically the relationship between Israel and the Palestinian people, and accuses Israel of aggression and fascism. The language used is confrontational and critical, suggesting a high level of political tension. Given the context and content, it is likely that the text is related to international relations or politics.