text: "We therefore propose that the Conference begin its next session in January 1991 by meeting at the ministerial level to examine the status of the negotiations at that time, identify the approaches needed to complete them, set a relatively short time-limit and give the corresponding instructions to delegations. The latter would then get down to work with the conclusion of a final agreement clearly in mind and would negotiate under the ministers' direct control." (CD/PV.570. p.16) (Continued in English) Mr. President, distinguished delegates, there can be no doubt that this is, at this particular time, the logical approach to the solution. CD/PV.572 9 (Mr. Ochsner. Switzerland) The problem will be in what way the ministers will establish the guidelines or instructions for their delegations. Will they be able and ready to give appropriate guidelines offering sufficient freedom of action? Will they be able to roughly co-ordinate their directives before the negotiators - you - will be sent back to work? The ministers will presumably be advised by the same specialists who are in charge of formulating your instructions. I have been at the job now for quite some time and have observed that many delegations, and among them very influential ones, are working under remote-control conditions, so to say, which does not facilitate speedy results. But, as the chances of a rapprochement have probably improved in this sector in the meantime, it should consequently be easier to give broadminded instructions. It will be crucial to create the best possible conditions for the 1991 session - the session of the expected breakthrough in many fields. My second point, if you permit, is this. In view of the desirability or even necessity of universal adherence, a better integration of the non-member States appears indispensable. Although the possibilities for participating in 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the framework for a diplomatic conference, specifically the format and instructions for ministerial-level negotiations. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting a focus on international relations and cooperation. The mention of "negotiations", "delegations", and "instructions" implies a discussion of formal agreements and diplomatic protocols.