text: msc&ets &LO voted in favour of carrying out their responsibilities as prescribed by the Charter. We knaw that in the final analysis me Pcwmr cannot stand as an obstacle to the peace process. The procedure of the Council is su& that we Wet keep our commnta within the ccliltext of the reasan for the ~ouncil’s having aret. We are not here to go into par iphetal w extended discuss ions. Let me recall sting in Geneva, deliberations: soarethihg that President Arafat said when he a:deessed the having been invited to participate in the Council’s (spok@ fn ArabfC) “when the Palestine Liberation Grganization (MB), with the aupport of the Arab Grcup, requested the convening of this urgent meeting of the Security couhcil, its request stemmed from the realisation that the situation has reached BR extremely dangerous and expiosive point. No longer cau hesitation be acceptable or verbal amdemnation sufficient. The situation new requires urgent actfor to enforce reverence for international legitimacy.’ (s/PV.2923, P* 11) At the end of his statement Ptesident Arafat said% *#%.I 4nnt4nn anA ,wuaxdten.snt kfi fh+ hmmsn hor4 tam =A ee t-lo rranmnta efl -e.- =- we--. -.- __-.-- __--..- __-...-_ ..--- -~- - -_ _ - - F -- justice and rightiousness Cp whhldi that heritage has been dedicated require that the Council should deci6 tjo form an international investigation . committee aompeeed of members of the Council tr3 investigate all the crimes JP/jf S/W.2926 42 (Hr. Ter zi, Palestine) against huamity that have bean perpetrated by the Xorarli Governslant again8t the Palestinian people.* (w.2923, p. 32) (continued in mgl ish) President Arafat made that request after &scribing the plight of the Palestinian people and the visitation that had befallen them. The position of the united Statss government is ti us unpardonablei it is 
analysis: The text appears to be a speech or statement made by President Arafat or another representative of the Palestine Liberation Organization, addressing the United Nations Security Council. The language used is formal and diplomatic, with references to international law, legitimacy, and the need for urgent action. The speech seems to be focused on the situation in the Middle East, specifically the treatment of the Palestinian people by the Israeli government, and the request for an international investigation into alleged crimes against humanity. The tone is urgent and emotional, with a sense of crisis and a call to action.