text: Israeli ruling authority, these are *liberated territories, that are not yet fulfilled, because Palestinians are still i.n them. . This is the basic confrontation. We have been dealing repeatedly in the Security Council with the various practices , deploring them, condeuning them and regretting them. Presidential statements have been repeatedly articulated at the Security Council, haping that by such appeals Israel would try to relent in the excessive violence that it pccsztises. Rut in a way - perhaps for so-called pragmatic reasans~ or out of realistic conuideratione - we decoupled the practices of Israel and the pdlicv of conqueet and annexation that Israel is practising. St is time 5.x us. collectively, to embolden ourselves - as many political endeavours have been characterized by etioldenment in the early 1990s - to recouple policy and practices, since these practices are SI instant outcome of a deliberate ptilicy, which is protected by ferael’e intransigence, contern* and total indiffecenca to the world comaunity. That is why the Israeli representative has the cheek, the audacity, t0 insult the Security Cuuncil and the mtivations of the Arabs ho aware to it. Then t&e Israeli representative talks about Arab resistance to Soviet-Jewish immigration, and he says that the Palestinians in the early 1920s resisted Jewish imsnigtatfem, ti that the Arab in the 19308 resisted Jewish immigration. %s, We did. We did because no people, no auntry would want voluntarily to abdicate prrt -- ..- OL au3 teccito*-r a: ’ &- --.. --LA-- -_-^-- .- --A-- L^ -IIc.d a.m. a mm*nab4e4- .Lu u”&AeG;cI”o Iessiuvry, +rl, “LUG& Lv uYuI-“u-u 6. “---.----..g pracese. We are not ashamed of our historical backgrarnd on this iesue. But we did acC*)mrndats, aud the President of Palestine yesterday, and in the General AWembly in Geneva last year, made a historic act of reconciliation, of compromise, 
analysis: The text appears to be a speech or statement by a representative of the Palestinian authority, criticizing Israel's actions in the "liberated territories" and calling for international action to address the situation. The language used is formal and diplomatic, but also strongly critical of Israel's policies. The text does not mention specific economic or environmental issues, but rather focuses on the political and humanitarian aspects of the conflict.