text: 118 195 000 276 000 1. Operatlng coste 100 293 000 100 293 000 170 000 9 749 000 Central supPoet administration and command (6) ---i (7) I Paca- Civil Paca- Civil t4i1itary t4i1itary mili- defence mili- defence assistance assistance Total Total tary tary Ibme Ibme Abroad UN Abroad UN forces forces terrl- terrl- peace- peace- tory tory keeping keeping (8) (8) (9) (9) 10) 10) (ll) (ll) (121 (121 (13) (13) 9 299 176 000 9 299 176 000 231 985 000 231 985 000 367 367 414 000 414 000 320 222 000 PRDPSED MRTRLX POR INTERNATION~L RBPORTING ON IIILITMY EXPENDITURE 2. Procurement snd canstructlon 2. PROCDREMRNT &ND CUNSTRDCTlON 2.1 Procurement 2.1.1 Aircraft end engInaLa 2.1.2 Icíesilt3a incl. con". warheads 2.1.3 Nuclear uarhtads and bomba 2.1.4 Shipe and boata 2.1.5 Arroured vehicles 2.1.6 Artillery 2.1.7 Othec gromd focce weapons 2.1.8 Drdkmce and ¿uwunitlon 2.1.9 Electronics and cornunlcations z-1.10 Non-armouced vehlcles 2.1.11 othcr stra- tegíc forces Rasourcc conta \ . . Lend Eoccer 80 000 000 80 962 000 Other H~litary comhat Industcy forces Depart- ment IS) If) I -F Central auppoct adninistretlon and cormand SupPmt Command 16) 17) ---r I .- Pate- rili- tary forces (8) Total 80 962 000 51 502 OOC 916 ooa 81 750 000 131 441 000 PROPOSED r(ArRIX EWR IHïZRNATION&L RJWORTING OH MILITARY EXPENDI'CURE 2. Procucemcnt and construction (contlnued) FOCCS gcoupa \ Rcsoucce costs 2.2 Construction 2.2.1 Airbaaes, airfields 2.2.2 Hlsslle sitcs 2.2.3 Naval bases and facilltles 2.2.4 dlectronlca etc. ol 2.2.5 Personnel facflitles 2.2.6 Hedícal facllltles 2.2.7 Tcaíning facilities p/ 2.2.8 Warehouses, depots, etc. s 2.2.9 Command and adm. facilities 2.2.10 Foctlfications 2.2.11 Shelters d 2.2.12 Land EJ 2.2.13 Other stcs- tegic l Land EOCCFlS forccs +- centra1 support adminlstratlon and command para- ClVIl Military alll- defsnce apslstance tary Hore Abroad UN 
analysis: The text appears to be a budget breakdown of a country's military expenditure, with various categories of procurement and construction costs. It does not seem to be related to economic development, natural resources, agriculture, forestry, fishing, industry, transport, communication, international trade, health, education, employment, or humanitarian aid. The language used is technical and specific to military spending, suggesting that it is primarily focused on science and technology.