text: 581. At the same meeting, the representative of Austria introduced draft resolution E/CN.4/1990/L.88, sponsored by Argentina, Austria*, Belgium, France, the Federal Republic of Germany, Hungary, the Netherlands*, the Philippines, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Yugoslavia and Zaire*. Japan subsequently joined the sponsors. 582. The representative of Austria orally revised the draft resolution by inserting a new operative paragraph 9 and a new operative paragraph 17, reading as follows: "9. Requests the Sub-Commission at its forty-second session to consider its practice of forwarding draft resolutions and decisions to the Commission for attention, action or consideration." "17. Invites the Chairman of the Commission to inform the Sub-Commission on the debate under this item." 583. The representative of the United States of America made a statement relating to the draft resolution as orally revised. 584„ The draft resolution, as orally revised, was adopted without a vote. 585. For the text as adopted, see chapter II, section A, resolution 1990/64. 586. At the same meeting, the Commission also had before it draft resolutions VI, VIII, XI, XII, XIII and XIV, recommended by the Sub-Commission for adoption by the Commission (E/CN.4/1990/2, chap. I, sect. A). 587. The attention of the Commission was drawn to the administrative and programme budget implications relating to draft resolutions VI and XIV, 1/ contained in annexes II and III to the Sub-Commission report (E/CN.4/1990/2). -273-588. At the same meeting, the Commission adopted draft resolution VI, without a vote. 589. For the text as adopted, see chapter II, section A, resolution 1990/65. 590. At the same meeting, the Commission considered draft resolution VIII. 591. The representative of Belgium orally proposed the following amendments: (a) Add the following paragraph at the end of the preamble: "Recognizing the vital role of the International Committee of
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the activities of the Commission on Human Rights, specifically the adoption of draft resolutions and the consideration of reports from the Sub-Commission. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting that the topic is related to international relations and human rights. The text does not mention specific economic, environmental, or scientific issues, but rather focuses on the procedural aspects of the Commission's work.