text: retain that portion of its contribution for the transfer of the posts in question. His delegation wished a recorded vote to be taken on section 21, and would vote against it. 50. Mr. MILLER (United States of America) said that he had mixed emotions on the section under discussion. His Government strongly supported the work of UNHCR. The high level of voluntary contributions it made to the Organization reflected the importance which it attached to the Organization's work. Over the past eight years, there had been a tenfold increase in the programmes and in the voluntary funds budget of UNHCR. His delegation also noted that the classification of posts in UNHCR did not reflect the increased responsibility which flowed from increases in the programme budget. Because of its long-held commitment to the principle of budgetary restraint, however, his Government regretted that it was unable to support the 1.7 rate of real growth in the budget for UNHCR for the biennium 1986-1987. Cost increases could be offset by savings elsewhere in the budget of UNHCR. Such arrangements were possible without disturbing the integrity of UNHCR programmes of protection and assistance to refugees. Sl. In addition, his delegation objected to the funding of the travel expenses of representatives of national liberation movements to attend meetings of the Executive Committee of UNHCR. It therefore requested that a recorded vote be taken on the recommendation contained in paragraph 675 of the CPC report, and that a separate recorded vote be taken on the appropriations for sectjon 21. / ... A/C.S/40/SR.36 English Page 11 52. Mr. ORSATELLI (France) said that he had not fully understood the views of the Chairman of the Advisory Committee on the proposals for reclassification. A clarification of those views would assist the Committee in taking a decision in full knowledge of the facts. 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing a United Nations meeting, specifically the Executive Committee of UNHCR (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees), and the budget and reclassification of posts within the organization. The speakers mention the importance of UNHCR's work, the growth of its budget, and the classification of posts. The text does not seem to be related to economic development, natural resources, agriculture, forestry, fishing, industry, transport, communication, international trade, health, education, employment, or culture. The most fitting category seems to be Humanitarian aid and relief, as it directly relates to the work of UNHCR and the discussion of its budget and reclassification.