text: "Complaint of the representative of the United Arab Republic in a letter to the President of the Security Council dated 27 May 1967 entitled 'Israel aggressive policy, its repeated aggression threatening peace and security in the Middle East and endanger­ ing international peace and security' ( S/7907) ;2 "Letter dated 29 May 1967 from the Permanent Representative of the United Kingdom addresseri to the President of the Security Council (S/7910)".2 At its 1344th meeting, on 30 May 1967, the Council decided to invite the representative of Lebanon to participate, without vote, in the discussion of the question. At its 1345th meeting, on 31 May 1967. the Council decided to invite the representatives of Ira(J and Mo­ rocco to participate, without vote, in the discussion of the question. At its 1346th meeting, on 3 June 1967, the Council decided to invite the representatives of Kuwait and Saudi Arabia to participate, without vote, in the dis­ cussion of the question. At its 1348th meeting, on 6 June 1967, the Council decided to invite the represt:ntatives of Tunisia and Libya to participate, without vote, in the discussion of the question. Resolution 233 ( 1967) of 6 June 1967 The Security Council, Noting the oral report of the Secretary-General in this situation, Having heard the statements made in the Council, Concerned at the outbreak of fighting and with the menacing situation in the Near East, 1. Calls upon the Governments concerned to take forthwith as a first step all measures for an immediate cease-fire and for a cessation of all military activities in the area; 2 "Plainte du representant de la Republique arabe unie, contenue clans une lettre adressee au President du Conseil cle securite, en date du 27 mai 1967, et intitulee "La politique d'agression d'Israel, 1.es actes 
analysis: The text appears to be a diplomatic document related to a conflict in the Middle East, specifically mentioning Israel, the United Arab Republic, the United Kingdom, Lebanon, Iraq, Morocco, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia, and Libya. The language used is formal and diplomatic, with a focus on international relations, security, and peace. The text does not mention any economic, environmental, or social issues.