text: 21,/ Restatetnent No. 202. See also .I. Crawford, fhe Creatlon of States inInternatioaal Law 23 (1979).(.... in principte the deaial of ,e.ogrittoD to aner'tity which otherwr'se qualifies "" Jstate-""anot elrtitre the nonrecogrizitrgStates to act as if the entity in question was not a State.,,), ir. Brierty, La!, ofNations 139 (6th ed,, watdock, 196j) ('A state may 6xist without being recoglized,antl if it does exist i'l fact, the!, rrbether or ooi it has bee! torrnaliy recogniz€dby other sEates, it has a right to be treated by them g€ a 6tate.,,). aZ/ The Turkish CFriot cornmunity has estabtished a repub.Lican governmeatexercising coDtrol over the lorthern t;ird of the island of cltrrus. Althoughfurkish troops r€naia on Cypriot soil, the continuing preseuc'e'of- t.oop" fro, a frieadly state for the purpose of preserving the rigrrts of the Turkisrr- cypriotpeople under the 1960 treaties i8 in no way incorsistert with statehood. The fact that the Tur*ish interveDtio' was made pur-suant to the terrns of the 1960 treatiesnakes the case even stronger.
analysis: The text appears to be discussing a legal issue related to the recognition of a state, specifically the Turkish Cypriot community's claim to statehood. The text references international law and treaties, and the focus is on the rights and status of the Turkish Cypriot people. This suggests that the text is related to international relations and law, rather than any of the other categories.