text: UNITED NATIONS THIRTY-SEVENTH YEAR nd MEETING: 3 1 MARCH 1982 NEW YORK CONTENTS PClgfc, Provisional agenda (S/Agenda/2342) . . . . . . . . . . . . . + . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . + a.. 1 Adoptionoftheagenda ..,.,..,...,,,,.,....,.,............ ,.. . . . . . . . . . I Letter dated 19 March 1982 from the Permanent Representative of Nicaragua to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General (S/14913) . ...*. I S/PV,2j42 Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters com- bined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. Documents of the Security Council (symbol S/. . .) are normally published in quarterly Supplernmts of the L$h’al Records of the Security Council. The date of the document indicates the supplement in which it appears or in which information about it is given. The resolutions of the Security Council, numbered in accordance with a system adopted in 1964, are published in yearly volumes of Resolutions and Decisions of the Security Comcil. The new system, which has been applied retroactively to resolutions adopted before 1 January 1965, became fully operative on that date. h 2342nd MEETING Held in New York on Wednesday, 31 March 1982, at 10.30 a.m. ---_- Prcsidcnt: Mrs. Jeane J. KIRKPATRICK (United States of America). p,*csrjnt: The representatives of the following States: china? France, Guyana, Ireland, Japan, Jordan. p~lnama, Paland, Spain, Togo, Uganda, Union of soviet Socialist Republics, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United States of Amer- ica, Zaire. Provisional agenda (S/Agenda/2342) I. Adoption of the agenda 2. Letter dated I9 March 1982 from the Permanent Representative of Nicaragua to the United Nations addressed to the Secretnry-General 
analysis: This document appears to be a record of a meeting of the United Nations Security Council, which is responsible for maintaining international peace and security. The agenda items relate to the situation in Nicaragua and do not seem to have any direct connection to specific economic or social issues. Therefore, it is unlikely that this document falls under any of the categories related to economic development, industry, transport and communication, international trade, health, education, employment, or culture.