text: programme; it brief!~ referred to the relevant earlier resolutions and to the I Centre's former and furrent activities, and indicated the servicing and resources required to implemen~ the mandates. The human rights programme was greatly expanding at a tiMe when the Centre's resources had been reduced. That expansion of mandates had to b~ matched by appropriate resources. The PRESIDENT drew attention to the letter dated 2 February 1990 addressed to him by lhe Chairman of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (E/1990/23, a nex V). Mr. STOBY (Secretary of the Council) said that under the existing rules and regulations the fhairman or rapporteur of a subsidiary organ who was called upon to present a re,ort of such an organ to a parent organ was entitled to travel and subsistence at tie expense of the United Nations, If the Council ~ere to decide to invite the Rapporteur of the Committee on Economic, Social andlcultural Rights to present the Committee's report to it in person, the estimated costs would be $7,500, assuming that the Rapporteur would come to New York for,oneweek. No provision was made in the programme budget for such travel and subsistence. However, it was likely that the costs in question could be absorbed in/the programme budget for the period 1990-1991. The PRESIDtNT said that, if he heard no objection, he would take it that the Council wished tJ invite the Rapporteur of the Committee on Economic, Social I and Cultural Rights to attend its meetings for one week, from 14 to 18 May 1990, during its review oflthe Committee's composition, organization and administrative arrangements. It was so decid@d. I • . • E/1990/SR.5 English Page 14 Mr. HASHIM (Special Co-ordinator for Emergency Relief Operations in Somalia) said that General Assembly resolution 441178 contained an appeal to the 
analysis: This text appears to be a meeting transcript of the United Nations Council, discussing the expansion of the human rights program and the potential costs of inviting a rapporteur to present a report. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting a focus on administrative and organizational matters rather than technical or scientific topics. The discussion revolves around budgetary and logistical considerations, which points towards a category related to governance or international relations.