text: right or duty is discussed with the greatest clarity and concision by Salmond in his Jurisprudence, in sections 46, "Sole ownership and co-ownership", and 122, "Solidary obligations". No better explanation of the subject could be given and reference should be made to it. Xf It is important to bear in mind that in the common law, to quote Salmond: "Co-ownership may assume different forms by virtue of the different incidents attached to it by law. Its two chief kinds in English law are distinguished as ownership in common and joint ownership. The most important difference between these relates to the effect of the death of one of the co-owners. In ownership in common the right of a dead man descends to his successors like any other inheritable right. But on the death of one of two joint owners his ownership dies with him, and the survivor becomes the sole owner by virtue of his right of survivorship or jus accrescendi." This distinction does not exist in the civil law, in which co-ownership means ownership in common. Consequently, the sharing of ownership, rights and duties represented in French and Spanish by the prefix co... needs to be translated into English as co... and not joint: thus copropriété. copropiedad, co-ownership, which if translated as joint ownership could mislead an English reader. 2/ However, in cases where this degree of precision is not required, joint is a perfectly adequate translation. ¿/ In some cases, nothing is gained by translating co...: owners for copropriétaires and accuseds for çoaccupés are perfectly explicit renderings where the context makes it clear that the ownership or the accusation is single and its subjects multiple. It is difficult to lay down rules about how to translate commun, común. As far as ownership or rights are concerned, common implies collective, 
analysis: The text appears to be a discussion of legal concepts, specifically co-ownership and the differences between common law and civil law. It references specific legal texts and uses technical legal terminology. The text does not seem to be related to any of the economic or development-related categories, nor does it appear to be related to humanitarian aid, employment, or culture. The focus is on the nuances of legal concepts and the need for precise translation.