text: full membership of the European Economic Community, thereby violating article 1 of the 1960 Treaty of Guarantee, according to which the "Republic of Cyprus" had undertaken not to participate in whole or in part in any political or economic union. The Greek Cypriots had thus created an obstacle to all efforts to achieve a freely negotiated and mutually acceptable settlement. That obstacle needed to be promptly eliminated. 51. The Greek Cypriot side was trying to erode Security Council resolution 649 (1990). By dragging the issue into all kinds of forums for propaganda purposes, it revealed how unwilling it was to come to terms with its counterpart, the Turkish Cypriot side. It was now of even greater importance that third parties should treat the two sides in Cyprus equally and fairly. In Cyprus, there was no single authority based on the consent of both sides. That would come into being only after a mutually satisfactory solution was found. 52. His delegation deplored the fact that a debate on Cyprus was taking place in the absence of one of the two parties directly involved in the negotiating process. If the Turkish Cypriots felt the need to reply to the baseless allegations made in the Sub-Commission in their absence, unfortunately they would have to do so once again in writing and after the debate was over. 53. Mr. STIGLICH (Observer for Peru) said that, during the past 10 years, Lhe increasingly violent campaign waged by the extremist and criminal group known as the Sendero Luminoso had led to the loss of 18,000 lives and to economic damage estimted at $17 billion. The violence and killings had continued even after the election on 28 July 1990, by the democratic process, of President Alberto Fujimori and a new national Parliament and regional governments. 
analysis: The text appears to be a diplomatic document discussing the political situation in Cyprus and Peru. It mentions the European Economic Community, the Security Council, and the Turkish Cypriot side, indicating a focus on international relations and politics. Additionally, it touches on human rights and violence in Peru. Given the scope of the text, it seems unlikely to fall under categories related to specific sectors like industry or agriculture.