text: said, I cannot emphasize too strongly that the United Kingdom deplores and condemns the renewed attack by South Africa upon Angola, and is concerned at its conse- quences. South Africa’s action is not merely improper and illegitimate, but utterly shortsighted and certain to be counter-productive. We find it incredible that the South African authorities fail to perceive how damaging such behaviour is to their own national interests and security, to say nothing of others’. 65. My delegation also finds it incredible and altogether unacceptable that the South African Government should blatantly disregard the decisions of the Council enshrined in resolution 571(1985). That constitutes a deliberate flout- ing of international opinion and, even more, of the United Nations body charged with primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security. The South African action deserves the severe censure of the Council. The South Africans must understand that those actions forfeit all respect and sympathy. 66. As I have said, the South African Government seems extraordinarily blind to the principles and concerns of governments such as mine. It leaves my delegation with a sense of indignation that it should so misunderstand us. 67. The representative of South Africa has just given us various pieces of advice. It is ironic that he does not see that in the first place that advice applies to his own Government. The representative of South Africa calls for the removal of all foreign forces from Angola. We agree. But what business, then, do the South African forces have in Angola fighting the legitimate Government of the coun- try? The representative of South Africa urged the Angolan Government to hold free elections. At one and the same time, the South Africans actually negotiate with the Government of Angola, thus acknowledging it, and attack 
analysis: The text appears to be a diplomatic statement condemning the actions of South Africa towards Angola, specifically the attack and disregard for international decisions. The language used is formal and emphasizes the importance of international law and respect for sovereignty. The topic is political in nature, with no mention of economic or social issues.