text: today in response to the request contained in the letter dated 1 October 1985 from the representative of Angola to the President of the Council [S/17520]. 3. I should like to draw the attention of the members of the Council to document S/17518, which contains the text of a letter dated 1 October 1985 from the representative of India to the Secretary-General. 4. The first speaker is the representative of Angola, upon whom I now call. 5. Mr. de FIGUEIREDO (Angola): Mr. President, I thank you for convening this meeting of the Security Council. 6. Just a few days ago, on 20 September to be exact [2606th meeting], I had the honour of bringing to the atten- tion of the Council the fact that there had been a massive armed aggression against the people and the territory of Angola. On that day the Council, in a most gratifying show of support for the position of the People’s Republic of Angola and for the principles for which we stand, unanimously adopted resolution 571 (1985) on the ques- tion of South African aggression against my country and people. 7. The ink had barely dried on that resolution-its recommendation on a fact-finding mission to Angola by a group of Council members had not even been imple- mented-when, lo and behold, the racist minority rkgime in Pretoria duplicated the very operation concerning which it was tried and censured on 20 September. On 28 Septem- ber, South African aircraft violated the airspace of Angola, repeating the violation on 29 September, both violations having been carried out with the purpose of reconnais- sance of the position of Angolan troops. On 30 September, between 3 a.m. and 6 a.m., a formation of over eight South African aircraft flew over Angolan troop positions in the 
analysis: The text appears to be a formal document from the United Nations Security Council, discussing a specific issue related to international relations and conflict. It mentions a country (Angola) and another country's aggression against it (South Africa), as well as resolutions and fact-finding missions. The text does not mention economic, social, or environmental issues, but rather focuses on international politics and security.