text: final hour to imprave the text of the draft resolution. The text that ua finally 8ohieved will not fully oath& eoaryone. Clearly, more ontld be &me with it. There are tie= that merit eharpef examination , and there uill k some who will retain apprcrhensione on c3ertAn points. JP/cw S/PV.2930 37 (Mr. Razali , Malaysia) At this time no ons can give my definitive assurance ar the action contemplated in the resolution. The lit~~us bet, therefore, will be its implementation. EWXyOne is aware of the implications, for the resolution is clearly in furtheranoe of resolutions 660 (1990) and 661 (1990). The course of actian to be taken cmsses a cleat line fraa applying sanctions ix~ readiness ti apply force if neceseacy in pursuit of compliance. The authority vested in the resolution by the Security Counail is given guardsdly, vith full awareness of the implications. We in the Non-Aligna MWeWint are avBpBe to having military forces frQp outside Powers Deployed in &her ragionsr meu if it is done QS the basis of legitimate appeal5 by aqgtfeveg parties. It is our e%Pectation that the reasans fot the presence of those btcee will oviftly be remwed and that equally quickly thosa force5 will leave the scene- The link in the resolution between tie aounttie5 referred to in paragraph 1 and the unltea Nations i5 not 60 satisfactotily spelt out as one vould have vishe8. But one should not be etatry-eyed an8 imagine that, given the pwent realities, there OM be UB international force under a bt\s fm Wlieing and adoming chited Oation hjunutttons. Given the need of the hour to enmre tbb mmplete effsutivenew of eanetion5, the Security Counail must, until that bay aoBlbSr be oimtent with only the beginning of United Nation5 control aation, althaugh Mslaysia snd other5 would have preferred a more aesrrtive and poWtent 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing a United Nations Security Council resolution related to international conflict and peacekeeping. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting a high-stakes international agreement. The mention of sanctions, force, and military presence implies a focus on conflict resolution and international security.