text: Unacceptable to the Turkish Cypriot side because such resolutions ignore the existing realities in Cyprus and attempt to neqate the principle of equality between the two sides. Notuithstandinq its rejection of the present resolution, for the reasons outlined above, the Government of the Turkish Republic of NorthePn CYPrUs is nevertheless fsvourab~y disposed to accept the presence of UNFICYP on tie b?rCitorY of the Turkish Republic oT Northern Cypus on the same basis as that stated in December 1989. Thus, our position mntinues to be that the princiole, the scope, the malities and procedures of co-operation between the authorities of th@ Turkish Republic of Northern Cynrus and UNFICYP shall be based only on decisions which shall ba taken solely by the Government of the Turkish Rewblic of Northern CYpcu8. In this @xnection, I should Like to recall the statemnt of the president of the Security Council, delivered on behalf of Council members on 30 %ay 1990 an the subject of United Nations peace-keepinq operations, in &ich he stated, inter alia, that t *They lthe iretiers of the Security Council] stress that a peace-keeping operation is essentially a temporary measure, intended to facilitate the remtution of conflicts and disputes. Its mndate is not +utomatically renewable. Peace-keepinq should never tx construed as a substituti for the S/W. 2928 42 (M c . Ror ay) ultimate goal, m early negotiated settlement. In the light of this, the metiers of the Council vi11 oontinue to examine carefully the anndate of each operation and, when necessary, vary it in retaponse to prevailing CiCcu~~~tances: (S/21323,‘p. 2) At this juncture, we have to stress that the present mandate of JJNFICXP is not compatible vith the radically changed conditions and circumstances of today- In the light of the present realities in Cyprus and the new a-roach spelled out in 
analysis: The text appears to be a diplomatic statement discussing the United Nations peacekeeping operation in Cyprus, specifically the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus's position on the matter. The language used is formal and technical, suggesting a focus on international relations, politics, and governance.