text: treaty which should include, by definition, acceptable and verifiable means of verification and compliance". Indeed, the international community expects to see negotiations leading to a very rapid process of elimination of nuclear CD/PV.570 27 (Mr, Azikiwe. Nigeria) weapons. It is therefore with profound consternation that my delegation continues to hear of the supposed continuing validity of the doctrine of nuclear deterrence, and the intention of some nuclear-weapon States to retain nuclear weapons for the foreseeable future. We are familiar with the arguments against a comprehensive test ban. My delegation appreciates the emotional and political fear and fixations about inspection and verification arrangements. But if the risk is that of daring the good faith of one another and not of mutual annihilation, it should be taken before it is too late. If the risk is not to diminish their current military capabilities, but to avoid the spread of nuclear weapons, it should be taken now. If the risk is not to challenge their present leadership roles in the world, but to enhance the performance of the primary responsibility assigned to them through the United Nations Security Council for the maintenance of international peace and security, that risk should be taken now to ban all nuclear tests. My delegation is encouraged to press this point because both super-Powers have hitherto always respected the agreements they have reached. We opened this session amidst further relaxation of East-West tensions and the prospects of reversing the decades of nuclear armament. As East-West tension appears to have subsided, the time is ripe for the nuclear-weapon States to extend the new spirit of co-operation to a comprehensive test ban. My delegation is aware of the complexities of the issues involved in the ultimate goal of general and complete disarmament. This notwithstanding, we 
analysis: The text discusses the elimination of nuclear weapons and the need for a comprehensive test ban, highlighting the importance of cooperation between nations to achieve this goal. The language used is diplomatic and formal, suggesting that the topic is being discussed in an international setting, possibly a United Nations conference. The text does not mention specific economic, environmental, or social issues, but rather focuses on the political and security implications of nuclear weapons.