text: exploitation of natural resources while at thC same time it attempts to preserve the system of apartheid. When the Angolan Government captured a South African military commando in its territory, that was proof that the strategy of provoking destabilization of southern Africa is still very much alive despite every effort and concession made by the front-line States in 1984 to promote a climate of trust and confidence in the region. In this connection the expansion of the apartheid rationale calls for renewed condemnation. 134. The Brazilian Government rejects any racial dis- crimination, especially the system of apartheid, as incom- patible with the basic values of Brazilian society and irreconcilable with the most elementary principles of respect for human dignity. Military aggression by South African forces and the establishment of the so-called inte- rim government are actions which endanger international peace and defy both international law and the Charter of the United Nations itself, Brazil also refuses to accept any policy based on economic and strategic interests that can only serve to postpone Namibian independence and the elimination of racist policies in South Africa. 135. In the case of Namibia, an ever-growing consensus is developing over the extent of the threat posed by the South African occupation of the Territory. No one would deny that most serious efforts have already been made by the international community in order to pave the way for a negotiated settlement for Namibian,independence. In spite of this concerted action South Africa has stalled the inde- pendence process, undermining the credibility of the United Nations. Other parties concerned, on the other hand, have given repeated signs of flexibility. Indeed, only a short time ago SWAP0 reaffirmed that it would be ready to negotiate a cease-fire, as long as it would be followed by free elections in accordance with the United Nations plan. 
analysis: The text appears to be a diplomatic statement or a declaration, focusing on the political and international relations aspects of the situation in Southern Africa, particularly regarding the issue of apartheid and the occupation of Namibia. It does not contain specific information about economic development, natural resources, industry, transport, communication, health, education, employment, humanitarian aid, culture, or science and technology. Instead, it emphasizes the need for international cooperation and condemnation of apartheid, military aggression, and racial discrimination.