text: paragraph 1 (e). We think that States parties should specify rather more than the "general function" of the space object - a criterion which makes it possible in theory to classify a military reconnaisance satellite as, for example, a communication satellite. It is clear that a more precise register would be useful as a basis, for example, for the subsequent formulation of regimes to protect satellites used for civilian or even selected military purposes, bearing in mind its stabilizing effect. It should be stressed that there is no reason why a more detailed description should affect the confidential nature of a mission or its effectiveness if there is an appropriate definition of what criteria constitute a complete and satisfactory general description of the functions of a space object. With regard to other types of additional information, we believe that the definition of common criteria could be entrusted to a group of governmental experts under the auspices of the Conference through its Ad hoc Committee. Turning now to the timeliness with which information is provided, it is clear that the terms in which the Convention is currently couched make it possible for information to come in late or even never, which is indeed the more probable. A political decision appropriately supported on scientific and technical level must determine what are the acceptable time-limits in order to make the Convention useful and operational. This does not imply that the information must be provided before the launch. The time-limit for notification and the scope of information could be defined in each case in accordance with the nature and functions of the object to be launched. To sum up, my delegation considers that a strengthening of the Registration Convention would not only better adapt that instrument to its original objectives, but also make it an important additional element for 
analysis: The text discusses the registration of space objects and the need for more precise information to be provided. It mentions the potential for a more detailed description of a space object's functions without compromising its confidential nature. The text also touches on the importance of timely notification and the need for a political decision to determine acceptable time-limits. These points suggest that the text is related to the regulation of space activities, which is a subset of science and technology.