text: verification. We are at present working to find a rational solution to this problem. The delegations have also focused their attention on devising a formula relating to the obligation of the sides not to circumvent the future treaty. In this context it is necessary to ensure that possible channels for circumventing the treaty - that is, undermining its effectiveness - are securely blocked. It seems that we are now close to finding a solution to this problem too. The outstanding issues also include the non-deployment of strategic offensive arms outside the national territories of the sides, and verification in this area. A schedule for the elimination of strategic offensive arms subject to reduction is being negotiated. The main concern here is to ensure a smooth process and preserve parity at all phases of reduction. One of the main obligations that will be assumed by the sides under the future treaty is to reduce their strategic offensive arms to the agreed levels. Naturally, this obligation requires a solid guarantee that the above-mentioned reductions are genuine and irreversible. Hence, there is a need to work out appropriate procedures for conversion or elimination of systems subject to the treaty. The major requirement with respect to such procedures is that they should preclude the possibility that the systems being cut will be restored or reconverted to their prior status. It should be noted that the sides have already agreed on the bulk of these procedures. However, some problems, mainly of a technical nature, remain. They relate to the fact that certain types of armament of the USSR and the United States have their own specific features. Nevertheless, we believe that we will soon manage to resolve these problems fully. I have broached only some issues that do not cover the entire range of 
analysis: This text appears to be discussing a diplomatic agreement between two nations, specifically the United States and the USSR, regarding the reduction and elimination of strategic offensive arms. The language used is technical and focused on the specifics of the agreement, indicating that the topic is likely related to national security or international relations. The text also touches on verification procedures and the need for a solid guarantee that the reductions are genuine and irreversible, suggesting that the category should be related to international relations and diplomacy.