text: 77. As to the actuarial imbalance, attention should be focused on the items of contributions and benefits. False hope should not be engendered that the investment return could simply or automatically solve the actuarial problems. Moreover, the investment return could not be measured against unrealistic targets. The Fund's investment return had compared well with the major market indices. Any attempt to dramatically increase the investment return carried the risk of aggravating the situation rather than improving it. Lastly, in a more general sense, efforts must be made to improve communication with all the parties associated with the Fund, in terms that were readily understood by all and did not give rise to unrealistic expectations of unfounded fears. 78. Mr. MSELLE (Chairman of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and budgetary Questions) stated that he wished to draw attention to the fact that, in paragraph 6 of its report (A/38/547), the Committee recommended a modification to the draft resolution concerning amendments to the Pension Fund's regulations as proposed by the Board in annex B to the addendum to its report (A/38/9). The Advisory Committee had considered the increase in the total rate of contribution proposed by the Board in paragraph 27 of its report; the increase was to be implemented gradually, with the first increase of 0. 7 5 per cent taking effect on 1 JamB ry 1984 and the other increases, also of 0.75 per cent being made on 1 January 1986, I ... A/C.5/38/SR.28 English Page 15 (Mr. Mselle) 1 January 1988 and 1 January 1990. However, the Advisory Committee, in recommending approval of the first increase on 1 Janta ry 1984, believed that the General Assembly should have an opportunity, at its fortieth session, to delay or rescind the further increases, and it was in that sense that it had modified the 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the financial management of a pension fund, specifically the actuarial imbalance and the proposed increases in contributions. The language used is formal and technical, suggesting a context of bureaucratic or administrative decision-making. The text does not seem to be related to any of the more concrete fields like natural resources, agriculture, or transportation.