text: reformulation, and the other opposing it as it considerably reduced the importance to be attached to the purpvs~ of a c:ont.:klct. In/For the texts of t.her;c? articles, see the third report of the Special Rapportcur (A/CN,4/431 and Corr.11, pp. S-21.lG9. As regards article 5 (original artiale 6 (State immunity)), the deletion of the bracketed phrase ‘land the relevant rules of general international law” proposed by the Special Rapporteur was supported by two members. It was said that the deletion of the phrase would eliminate the poseibility of unilateral interpretations of international law by domestic courts) it was also pointed out that there would always be room for the application of new rules of international law with or without that reference in the present draft articles. Some other members, however, considered it preferable that no decision on the wording of this draft article and of the title of Part II be taken until after the completion of the second reading of the remaining articles, particularly of Parts III and IV. 170. Concerning article 10 (original article 11 (Commercial contracts)) one member stated that he would have preferred a reformulation of the article which did not include any reference to the applicable rules of private international law. The text recommended by the Special Rapporteur was, in his view, somewhat eclectic and left room for a good deal of uncertainty. In that connection, he recalled that the business community had in the past deplored the frequent inclusion of similar vaguely worded references in international ’ agreements. In his view, it would be preferable if paragraph 1 of the article referred to international agreements concerning choice of jurisdiction or to clauses designating the governing law, and he asked the Special Rapporteur and the Drafting Committee to consider that suggestion. As to article 11 U
analysis: This text appears to be discussing the drafting of international law articles, specifically regarding the wording and implications of certain clauses. The language used is formal and technical, suggesting a focus on international relations and legal frameworks. The content seems to be more conceptual and theoretical than practical or applied, and there is no mention of specific industries, sectors, or activities.