text: 2. It believes tha! Israeli activities in the occupied Arab territories,includirq alr legislative and admrntstra.ive measures taken by rsraer. to change the physical characCer. denographic conposlt.ion and atatus of those territorie6, including East Jerusale', flagrantly violaie lhe rourttr Geneva convention ot 1949, on the proEection ot the civilian popufation ii tir. of uar, and the relevanc united Nations resorutions. .Tbey uritantry contradict the cbarter of the united NaEions and nunerous resolutions- "r irt. J.l"irty councit and che ceneral Assembry. such actlvities create serious obstacr.eg to iie'acrrievenent of a just and rasting peace in the Middte Easc. 3' The sovier union uirr not recognize any changes nade by rsrael in Ehe @cupied Arab territories and takeg no act.ion which could be used by rsrael in the pursuit ot its policies of annexation and colonization of those lands. Tbe soviet unron ful'ly supports the c€neral Asaenbry's "pp."i lo-rn. security councir to take neasures to halt rsraeli policies and piictices in the occupied Arab terri.tories. {. IE is obvious that Igrael would no. have decided to flout so blatantLy the universally recognized rules of 'nte.n.tiiiui ilr, *re principres ot the charler of the United Nat.ions and the decisions of Che Organization if iL aia ,_t enioy the protection and all.-roundADerica. I GupporE ot j.ls ,strategic allyr, tbe united scates ot
analysis: The text appears to be a political statement or a diplomatic document, as it refers to international law, United Nations resolutions, and specific countries (Israel, Soviet Union, and the United States). It also mentions occupied territories, annexation, and colonization, which suggests a focus on international relations, politics, and conflict resolution.