text: 40. Mexico was persuaded that if the Commission was to go on increasing its authority and the effectiveness of the mechanisms it had set up, it should abide scrupulously by the terms of reference it had been given and demonstrate objectivity and realism. The Commission should further rationalize its work, not in a technocratic sense, but by drawing on its long experience and by taking into account changes in the subjects on its agenda, the interdependence of all human rights and, as stressed in General Assembly resolution 32/130, the overall context of the differing environments in which human rights issues had their place. 41. Mexico found it disturbing that human rights violations should sometimes be considered a feature of the third world. Such a North-South dichotomy was unacceptable. To be effective, the Commission should consider violations in all parts of the world, irrespective of the geographical, economic or political situation of the countries concerned. 42. In formulating its opinions, the Commission should always bear in mind the Proclamation of Teheran, which stated that lasting progress in the implementation of human rights was dependent upon sound and effective national and international policies of economic and social development. 43. To cope with the Commission's increasing workload, areas where the powers or activities of the various bodies in the international human rights system overlapped must be identified. For example, when standards were set, there should be fruitful co-operation between the xmiversal and the regional bodies through suitable exchanges of information. 44. If the many documents submitted to the Commission were translated into all the official languages, the Commission would be able to make better use of the limited time at its disposal and the quality of its discussions would be improved. In that respect Mexico regretted that not all the regional groups had been able to express their views on the very important draft declaration 
analysis: The text discusses the role and functioning of the Commission on Human Rights, emphasizing the importance of objectivity, realism, and cooperation between different bodies in the international human rights system. The text also touches on the theme of economic development and its relation to human rights, highlighting the need for effective national and international policies. This suggests that the text is more focused on human rights and international relations rather than a specific sector like agriculture or industry.