text: COMPLAINT BY ANGOLA AGAINST SOUTH AFRICA67 Decisions At its 2596th meeting, on 20 June 1985, the Council decided to invite the representatives of Angola, Argen­ tina, the Bahamas, Cuba, the German Democratic Republic, J.,iberia, Pakistan, Sao Tome· and Principe, South Africa, the Sudan, the United Republic of Tan­ zania and Yugoslavia to participate, without vote, in the discussion of the item entitled "Complaint by Angola against South Africa: letter dated 13 June 1985 from the Permanent Representative of Angola to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Coun­ cil (S/ 17267)"." At its 2597th meeting, on 20 June 1985, the Council decided to invite the representative of'the Congo to par­ ticipate, without vote, in the discussion of the question. Resolution !67 (198S) of 2D June 1985 The Security Council, Having heard the statement of the Minister for Exter­ nal Relations of the People's Republic of Angola," Recalling its resolutions 387 (1976), 418 (1977), 428 (1978), 447 (1979), 454 (1979), 475 (1980), 545 (1983) and S46 (1984), · Gravely concerned at the renewed escalation of un­ provoked and persistent acts of aggression committed by the racist regime of South Africa in violation of the sovereignty, airspace and territorial integrity of Angola, as evidenced by the recent military attack in the province of Cabinda, Conscious of the need to take effective steps for the prevention and removal of all threats to international peace and security posed by South Africa's military at­ tacks; I. Strongly condemns South Africa for its recent act of auression against the territory of Angola in the Prov­ ince of Cabinda as well as for its renewed intensified, premeditated and unprovoked acts of aggression, which constitute a flagrant violation of the sovereignty and ter­ ritorial integrity of that cc,untry and seriously endanger 
analysis: This text appears to be a formal document related to international relations and security, specifically addressing a complaint by Angola against South Africa. The language used is formal and diplomatic, with a focus on condemning South Africa's actions and calling for the prevention and removal of threats to international peace and security. The text does not mention economic, social, or cultural issues, nor does it relate to natural resources, environment, agriculture, or industry. It seems to be primarily concerned with international relations and security.