text: viljoents t$elve poin! MlnoriEy Rlghrs speech of ll uay I990, chough sllerir on the c)rpe of legal systeur envlsaged by the Apar!he!d regime, Ilevertheless contEadicts PriflcipIe 15.6 of the Harare Declaratlon of the OAU Ad-Hoc CoEtrlitlee oll Southern Afr{ca on lhe queslj.on of South Afrlca and ]f of the Unlted Na!1ons Consensus Declaratlon on Aparlhcld and Its DesEructlve Consequeflces in Southern Afrlcr. @, o" i[lplied by lhe notlon of 'Croup Rlghts' h che service of Ehe preservallotl of !,7hite excluslvity ard/or donination is inconpatlble ,1ch gs!gll!{_3! individusls before the loe.iew Icgal systen which shal1 guarantee equalicv before the law." (I6,6 5.4.0 5.5.0 economic order lrhlch shall promote and advance the well-belng of all south Africans.r' (f6.8, lletate Declarallon of the oAlt Ad_Hoc colwriltee on Southern Africa on lhe Quescion of South Afrlca ot 3h ltt ttnlled Natj.ons consensus oeclaraclon oo AparEheid and lts Deslructivetlith respect to the prlnclple: "South Afrlca shall have an independent and non-rocla! judlclarv." (16.7 Harare Declara!ion of the oAU Ad-Hoc CodBlt!e€ on Southe!n Africa on che Questlon of South Afrlca or 3g of Un1!ed Naclons Conseosus Declcratlon on Apar!held aard lcs Deslrucilve consequences ln Southern Afrlca). Irl his speech of tl May i990, l,lr. viLjoen said, "lhat dn independen! Jud!ciary lll exerclse judicial- auchorlty 1o cases belveen onc person 4nd anoth€i and bellreen cilizens and lhe sca!e". Ho!.ever, Ile locaEes thcse reoarks *1thln lhe franework of rhe thruEt of his speech whlch !s the Apartheld re8lBts's perceived lleed to procect group rlghts, The Apartheid reglne 81ves prioricy !o the protection of group rlghts over the necesslty of an independent judlclary. !h1s is contrary Eo Paragraph 16.7 of the Harare Declara!ion of the OAU Ad-lloc CoEolttee ofl Southerrl Africa on the Quesllon o! South Afrlca alld 38 of the Uni.ted Nallons Consensus Declera!1on on
analysis: The text appears to be a critique of the Apartheid regime's legal system, specifically highlighting the contradiction between the regime's emphasis on group rights and the principles of an independent judiciary and equality before the law. The text references international declarations and agreements, suggesting that the author is drawing on a broader framework of human rights and international law. While the text does not explicitly discuss economic development or other sectors, its focus on the legal system and human rights suggests that the category most fitting is likely to be related to human rights or social justice.