text: ous intractable problems, and in particular to ensure the implementation of the United Nations plan for the inde- pendence of Namibia. We hope that conditions enabling the Secretary-General to continue his endeavours will emerge. 117. These Council meetings are taking place at a time when world public opinion has more than ever focused its attention on developments in southern Africa and is expecting firm international action which can at last per- suade South Africa that it has to alter radically its policies with regard to Namibia and apartheid. If the Council can fulfil the expectation of world public opinion, it will not only contribute decisively to the solution of the current problems in southern Africa, but also provide proof that the United Nations, as it prepares to celebrate its fortieth anniversary, is capable of playing a fundamental role for peace, freedom and justice in the world. 118. The independence of Namibia has been on the agenda of the United Nations since its inception. It is true that some other problems have also preoccupied the United Nations from the very beginning and still await solutions. But the Namibian problem has a unique charac- teristic, Since the General Assembly terminated South Africa’s Mandate in 1966, Namibia has come under the 12 direct responsibility of the United Nations, The Organiza- tion therefore has a special commitment towards Namibia, a commitment that it has been unable to fulfil for 20 years. 119. On the other hand, there is no other problem for which the international community has unanimously approved terms for a settlement. Resolution 435 (1978) prepares the ground for the exercise of the right of self- determination by the people of Namibia through free elec- tions under the auspices and supervision of the United Nations. The plan evolved by the Council, which has also 
analysis: The text discusses the international community's efforts to ensure the independence of Namibia, with a focus on the United Nations' plan and resolution 435 (1978). The language used is diplomatic and emphasizes the importance of international action to address the problem. The text does not mention economic development, natural resources, industry, transport, communication, international trade, health, education, employment, or culture. It does not seem to be related to humanitarian aid and relief, but rather to international relations and politics.