text: estimates of expenditure under section 6. That recommendation as it affected /_. A/C.~/4U/~K.Jl English Page 10 (Mr. Mselle) staffing of the Information Systems Unit was explained in paragraphs 6.5 and 6.6 of its report. As could be seen from paragraph 6.11, an amount of $9,000 was being deleted on technical grounds, and in paragraph 6.13 the Advisory Committee gave its reasons for not approving $17,400 for an ad hoc expert group meeting on self-evaluation. 56. The Committee for Programme and Co-ordination, in paragraphs 628 and 630 of its report, recommended four additional outputs. According to the Secretary-General's statement of programme budget implications arising from the CPC report (A/40/38/Add.l), those outputs would be carried out within the resources to be approved under section 6. 57. Mr. DITZ (Austria) expressed surprise at the low resource allocation in section 6, considering the importance attached to economic and social development and the need for follow-up action to the numerous major international conferences in the social sector that had been held recently. Regarding programme 5 in particular, his delegation was concerned about the redeployment of resources to New York from the Centre for Social Development and Humanitarian Affairs at Vienna. He wished to know on what basis it had been decided not to maintain the Centre's resources in 1986-1987 at the same level as for the previous biennium. 58. Mr. MURRAY (United Kingdom) noted that a study had been undertaken on the Centre in 1984 by the Administrative Management Service. He asked whether the findings of that study had been taken into account in the budget proposals or, if not, whether they would be reflected at a later stage. 59. Mrs. KNEZEVIC (Yugoslavia), speaking on behalf of the Group of 77, said that 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the budget and resource allocation for international organizations, specifically the United Nations, with regards to the Centre for Social Development and Humanitarian Affairs. The topics mentioned include the allocation of funds for specific programs, the redeployment of resources, and the consideration of previous studies. The focus seems to be on the development and humanitarian sectors.