text: at the Council table and to make his statement. 65., Mr. D’ESCOTO BROCKMANN (Nigeria) (interpre- ration from Spanish): Your decision, Sir, to preside person- ally over this historic series of meetings of the Council as it discusses once again the question of Namibia reflects the high priority Trinidad and Tobago assigns to the delicate and urgent matter of the total independence of Namibia. As a Caribbean country that is part of the great Latin American family, Trinidad and Tobago embodies the prac- tice of non-aligned principles. If we add to that State policy your skills and personal experience, we cannot but expect that the work of the Council will lead to substantive decisions that will benefit the Namibian people. The Nicaraguan delegation is pleased to reiterate its complete co-operation with you. 66. May I also greet my colleagues whose presence in this debate demonstrates the importance that the Movement of Non-Aligned Countries attaches to this issue, 67. Nicaragua is participating in this debate for two reasons. First of all, we are complying with agreements set forth in the plan of action [see S/l 7284, annex] adopted at the Extraordinary Ministerial Meeting of the Co-ordinat- ing Bureau of Non-Aligned Countries on the question of Namibia held at New Delhi from 19 to 21 April 1985. Secondly, our participation reflects the fact that ourpeople and Government are completely at one with and commit- ted to the fraternal people of Namibia and with SWAPO, the sole and legitimate representative of that people, in their struggle for the complete liberation of Namibia. 68. We understand, identify with and are in complete support of the people of Namibia, with whose unassailable vanguard, SWAPO, we share the experience of having emerged from a hard and bloody national-liberation strug- gle carried out against the military in power imposed by a 
analysis: This text appears to be a statement from the Nicaraguan delegation to the United Nations Council, discussing the topic of Namibia's independence. The text does not mention specific economic, environmental, or scientific issues, but rather focuses on the political and diplomatic aspects of the situation. The language used is formal and diplomatic, indicating that the text is likely related to international relations and politics.