text: tions addressed to the President of the Security Coun­ cil (S/21765); 104 "Letter dated 15 September 1990 from the Permanent Representative of Greece to the United Nations ad­ dressed to the President of the Security Council (S/21766); 104 "Letter dated 15 September 1990 from the Permanent Representative of Ireland to the United Nations ad­ dressed to the President of the Security Council (S/21767); 104 "Letter dated 15 September 1990 from the Permanent Representative of Sweden to the United Nations ad­ dressed to the President of the Security Council (S/21768);104 "Letter dated 15 September 1990 from the Permanent Representative of Norway to the United Nations ad- 23 dressed to the President of the Security Council (S/21769); 104 "Letter dated 15 September 1990 from the Permanent Representative of Portugal to the United Nations ad­ dressed to the President of the Security Council (S/21770); 104 "Letter dated 15 September 1990 from the Permanent Representative of Australia to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council (S/21771);104 "Letter dated 15 September 1990 from the Permanent Representative of Luxembourg to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council (S/21773)'". 104 Resolution 667 (1990) or 16 September 1990 The Security Council, Reaffirming its resolutions 660 (1990) of2 August 1990, 661 (1990) of 6 August 1990, 662 (1990) of9 August 1990, 664 (1990) of 18 August 1990, 665 ( 1990) of 25 August 1990 and 666 (1990) of 13 September 1990, Recalling the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Rela­ tions of 18 April 1961106 and the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations of 24 April 1963,107 to both of which Iraq is a party, Considering that the decision of Iraq to order the closure of diplomatic and consular missions in Kuwait and to withdraw the privileges and immunities of these missions 
analysis: The text appears to be related to a specific international conflict, likely the Gulf War, and the actions taken by the Security Council in response. The language used is formal and diplomatic, indicating that the text is likely a resolution or statement from the UN. The text does not mention economic development, natural resources, agriculture, forestry, fishing, industry, transport, communication, health, education, employment, humanitarian aid, or culture. It does not seem to be related to science and technology either.