text: of), Iraq, Ivory Coast, Jamaica, Kenya, Madagascar, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Niger, Nigeria, Oman, Pakistan, Peru, Qatar, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Sudan, Swaziland, Thailand, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, United Republic of Tanzania, Yemen, Yugoslavia. Against: Australia, Belgium, Bulgaria, Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic, Canada, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, France, German Democratic Republic, Germany, Federal Republic of, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mongolia, Netherlands, New zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United States of America. Abstaining: Argentina, Austria, Brazil, Chile, Ecuador, Honduras, Liberia, f.iexico, Morocco, Romania, Venezuela. 13. The proposal was adopted by 46 votes to 31, with 11 abstentions. 14. The CHAIRMAN invited the Committee to decide on the second Kenyan proposal, to transfer one P-5 post from the Environment Fund to the regular budget. 15. The proposal was adopted by 54 votes to 31 with 4 abgtentions. / ... A/C.5/40/SR.36 English Page 5 16. The CHAIRMAN invited the Committee to proceed to a decision on section 18 as a whole. The amounts involved in the proposals just adopted would have to be incorporated into the proposed appropriation. 17. Mr. MSELLE (Chairman of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions) said that the amount involved in the proposal already made by the Secretary-General for the transfer of the P-5 post was $130,200, which should be incorporated immediately into the amount to be voted on. He understood that, according to the representative of Kenya, the reclassification of the D-1 post would not require an additional appropriation. 18. Mr. DEVREUX (Belgium) understood from the statement of the Director of the Budget Division that the reclassification from D-1 to D-2 had already been 
analysis: The text appears to be related to a United Nations General Assembly committee discussion, focusing on budgetary and administrative matters. The proposals mentioned involve the transfer of posts and funding from one budgetary item to another, which suggests a connection to the organization's administrative and financial operations.