text: and the USSR have so far yielded a certain measure of progress, with both sides announcing their readiness to reduce their huge CW arsenals. This is long overdue. No further progress is discernible, however, other than this vague expression of their intention to slash a portion of their CW arsenals within a relatively long time frame in the future. They have neither jointly pledged to halt CW production and improvement nor shown a common desire to refrain from the use of chemical weapons. This falls far short of the expectations of the Conference and the international community as a whole. CD/PV.551 5 (Mr, Hou, China) Alarmingly, not only is there an absence of commitment to the complete elimination and total destruction of existing chemical weapons, but also a new argument has been advanced for the retention of chemical weapons. It is held that even after joining the convention, a State party still has the right to retain a portion of its stockpiles should any country which it unilaterally and subjectively judges to be "CW-capable" not become a party to the convention. Furthermore, there are signs on their part indicating an attempt to keep their CW production facilities ready for resumption of production at any moment. The authors of this argument claim that this will enhance the universality of the convention. In fact, if anything this has set up new obstacles for the negotiations, and therefore has already caused widespread concern and opposition. The reason is simple and clear. Article I of the "rolling text" of the draft convention stipulates justly and unequivocally that the obligation regarding the complete prohibition and thorough destruction of chemical weapons and their production facilities should unconditionally apply to all States parties. If any State party is free 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing a specific international agreement or treaty related to chemical weapons, and the negotiations surrounding it. It highlights the lack of progress in reducing chemical weapons stockpiles and the concerns around countries retaining the right to produce and retain such weapons. The text also mentions a draft convention and its stipulations. Given this context, it is likely that the category is related to international relations, diplomacy, or security.