text: to the title of the topic than “measures of constraint” in thr, present title. The latter, in his opinion, did not clearly indicate whether or not it covered execution, which weLIt woll beyond measures of constraint, . - 9-w The text, as provisionally adopted on first reading by the Commission, read as follows: The provisions of the present articles shall not prejudge any question that may arise in regard to extraterritorial effects of mewuros of nationalisation taken by a Stats with regard to property, n~ovehlo or immovable, industrial or intelloctunl .‘I - 96 -2.2.1 The texts, as provisioaally adopted on first reading by the Commiacion, read a8 followst “Articla. State frmes of cm A State enjoys immunity, in connection with a proceeding before a court of another State, from measures of constraint, including any measures of attachment, arrest and execution, on the use of its property or property in its possession or control [,or property in which it hes a legally protected interest,] unless the property1 (a) is specifically in use or intended for use by the State for commercial [non-governmental] purposes and has a connection with the object of the claim, or with the agency or instrumentality against which the procooding was directedl or (b) has been allocated or earmarked by the State for the satisfaction of the claim which is the object of that proceeding. 1. A State cannot invoke immunity, in connection with a proceeding before a court of another State, from measures of constraint on the use of its property or property in its possession or con:rol [, or property in which it has a legally protected interest, ] if and to the extent that it has expressly consented to the taking cf such measures in respect of that property, as indicatedr (a) by international agreement] (b) in a written contract; or
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the immunities of a State in relation to its property and the measures of constraint that can be taken against it. The text mentions "measures of nationalisation" and "measures of attachment, arrest and execution", which suggests a connection to international law and the legal framework surrounding the use of State property. The text also discusses the specific uses of State property, such as commercial purposes, which implies an economic or financial context.