text: 367. The Special Rapporteur specified that he had not intended to confine interest to sums of money. He agreed, however, with both the suggestion of deleting article 9 and of including the general obligation to pay interest in article 0, perhaps in paragraph 3. A&.&la 1Q.1 of non-r- 26.31 368. The Special Rapporteur stated that a review of State practice and literature indicated that satisfaction had frequently been granted as an autonomous remedy, even though sometimes it was given in conjunction with other forms of remedy and occasionally so absorbed into pecuniary compensation that the award of satisfaction was difficult to perceive. In literature many authors viewed satisfaction as a specific remedy for injury to the State’s m./Article 10, as proposed by the Special Rapporteur, read as followsr e 1.In the measure in which an internationally wrongful act caused to the injured State a moral or legal injury not susceptible of remedy by restitution in kind or pecuniary compensation, the State which committed the wrongful act is under an obligation to provide the injured State with adequate satisfaction in the form of apologies, nominal or punitive dsmages, punishment of the responsible individuals or assurances or safeguards against repetition, or any combination thereof. 2.The choice of form or forms of satisfaction shall be made taking into account the importance of the obligation breached and the existence or degree of wilful intent or negligence of the State which has committed the wrongful act. 3,A declaration of wrongfulness of the act by a competent international tribunal may constitute in itself an appropriate form of satisfaction. 4.In no case shall a clain for satisfaction include humiliating demands on the State which has comr..itted the wrongEu1 act. OK- a viulatio:l of that State’s sovereign equality or domestic jurisdiction.“ - 220 -dignity, honour or prestige. Some authors expressed the view that
analysis: The text appears to be discussing international law and the concept of "satisfaction" as a remedy for internationally wrongful acts, which is a legal and diplomatic concept. The language used is formal and technical, indicating a focus on international relations and the law rather than a specific sector or field.