text: the staff bodlee to be nade by nonthly deductlona from Lhelr meEbens upon their rrltfen authorlzatlon. 74, ft is alao suSSested that the General' AsseEbly thould requeat the Secretary- Ceneral to ensure that terma of reference of staff bodlea and thelr representa- tlves shoul.d no! contradict the Staff Regulatlons and not lnclude provLsiona, such alr uae of rtrlke, etc. Considering that the sbaff representatlves 4ake Euch rore stresa on rlghts than on obLiSatlons ' approprlate balance between the two should be established and the lnterests of both staff and Menber Stales be taken lnto account. -22- V. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOHMENDATTONS 15,_ In July 1984, ICSC, upon the recomflendations of AcpAQ, its subsidiarybo\r, and ita secretariat, aE ue1l aa the vietrs of ACC, CCAQ and staff bodi;e.took a declslon on the 9.5 percent increase of post adJuetEents lndex forNeu York whiqh iraa based on the so-called "pragnaticu approach and thua wascontrary to the Noblenalre prlnclple aod relevant ceneral Assemb.ly reaolutlona.Therefore, thls decielon was not objeclive because the lnteresta of MenberStatea have not been taken lnto account. Due to the fact that the Commisslonhaa rather lLmlted tlne (two three-week sesaions a year) for conslderatlonof nunerous and conpllcated questlons, it noEtty reLles upon lt.s aecretarl.ab'aadv!.ce and r.ecoEEendations whlch in lEny casea reflect the lnbereats of staffonly. neconnendatlon No. I The Ceneral Asseobly Ehould establlsh, as in the past, a Speqlal Connltteeconpoaed of SovennEental exper.ta to assist ICSC ln underLaking a thorough andobJectlve revlew ol aII aspecta of the tnlted Natlons syaten of renunefall.onfor staff ln the Professlonar and above categorlea and its conparlson to the oneln the United Staues Federal Clvil Servlce. This compar!.son shoutd reflect th€dlfference ln uorklng hour' which ls IO., percent :.n ihe Unltea lhtlons favour.
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the management and compensation of staff within the United Nations system, specifically in relation to the International Civil Service Commission (ICSC) and the General Assembly. The language used is formal and technical, suggesting a focus on administrative and bureaucratic matters. The text also mentions the comparison of the United Nations system to the United States Federal Civil Service, which may imply a focus on employment and compensation.