text: S/10927 which proposes in operative paragraph 1 the approval of the recommendations and suggestions con- tained in paragraphs 10 to 22 of the report. 38. The resolution contains on the other hand a number of proposals drawn from section IV on which the Com- mittee could not reach agreement. The Council will recall, however, that I referred to these proposals in expressing the hope of my delegation that further agreement can be reached on them and in expressing our readiness to co-operate in such an effort. My delegation has also stated in paragraph 36 of the report that it could support some of the proposals on which there was no agreement but that it had difficulty with some others because of their incom- patibility with present Austrian legislation. 39. Let me say in this context that, with many other delegations, we share the belief that appropriate legislation is without any doubt a useful instrument within the context of preventing sanctions violations. Nevertheless, we have to take into account the differing legal orders of Member States, which might make certain specific legis- lation difficult to enact. This, however, would in no way prevent them from taking other measures, legislative or administrative, which could achieve. the same aims. 1 See resolution 333 (1973). 40. Therefore my delegation understands the proposals in question as an invitation to seek, within the Austrian legal order, adequate legislative solutions to achieve the aims behind the relevant parts of the resolution, With this understanding, and in order to express our full support for the political objectives behind this and previous resolutions of the Council on the same matter, namely, the ending of the rebellion against the British Crown in Salisbury, and to give the people of Zimbabwe the right of self-determination at the earliest possible moment, my delegation has voted in 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing a resolution related to a political issue, specifically the ending of a rebellion and granting self-determination to a people. The language used suggests a diplomatic or international context, with references to the Council, Member States, and the legal orders of these states. While there is no direct mention of economic or social issues, the text implies that the proposed legislation is intended to prevent sanctions violations, which may have economic or social implications.