text: representative just mentioned, Israel is subject to a different standard: it is we s/w. 292 6 22 (Mr. Maksoud) almost diplomatically persecuted! That is a total reversal of realities and 5tandards. Therefore the Palestine Liberation Organisation is, along with the Arabs, described as purveyors of blood, as the Israeli representative just menticxted. And we, as Arabs, become involved in a "paroxysm of hate". This is language that even professional racists have used, that anti-Semites have used against Jews, that the perpetrators of pograms and the holocaust have wed, that the professional racists of apartheid , who even refuse some of the more moderating policies, have used. This sort of thinking, this description of an entire national reaction, being attributed to a "paroxysm of hatee", to the opportunity of purveying blood, undoubtedly justifies our anger and frustration. Vhat kind of entity are we dealing with that relentlessly describes the Palestinian people as Palestinian Arab inhabitants of "the territories*# as if those territories have no naroa, have no designation, have no history, have no territorial patrimony? And then , with utter arrogance, Israel has *the exclusive responsibility" in these areas. By what right? By whwe mandate? Exclusive responsibility as an occupying Power, perhaps. But does Israel recognise that it is an occupying Power in those tecrftories? The answer came this afternoon in the dismissal of what is "labelled* the occupying Pouer, as if this is not the correct description, as if this is not the legal description, as if this is not incremental jurisprudence describing the etatue of Israel in the occupied territories. 0y what authority, if not as an occupying Power, does Israel claim exclusive jurisprudence and juri5dfaion in) the occupied territories? That question has not been answered by Israel. But that 
analysis: The text appears to be a speech or statement made by a representative of the Palestine Liberation Organisation, addressing the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the treatment of the Palestinian people by the Israeli government. The language used is strongly critical and emotive, with references to racism, persecution, and historical injustices. The text does not contain any specific references to economic development, natural resources, or technology, but rather focuses on the political and human rights aspects of the conflict.