text: en date des 4, 6, 20 et 27 septembre 1965, 1. Réaffirme sa résolution 211 {1965) dans toutes ses parties; 16 2. Prie les Gouvernements de l'Inde et du Pakistan de coopérer à la mise en application intégrale du para- 88 Ibid., document S/6710 et Add.1 et 2. 37 Le projet de résolution n'a pas été mis aux voix. of resolution 211 (1965); calls upon them to instruct their armed personnel to co-operate with the United Nations and cease ail military activity; and insists that there be an end to violations of the cease-fire; 3. Demands the prompt and unconditional execution of the proposal already agreed to in principle by the Govemments of India and Pakistan that their repre­ sentatives meet with a suitable representative of the Secretary-General, to be appointed without delay after consultation with both parties, for the purpose of for­ mulating an agreed plan and schedule for the withdrawals by both . parties; urges that such a meeting take place as soon as possible and that such a plan contain a time­ limit on· its implementation; and requests the Secretary­ General to report on the progress achieved in this respect within three weeks of the adoption of the present resolution; 4. Requests the Secretary-General to submit for its consideration as soon as possible a report on compliance with the present resolution. Adopted at the 1251st meeting by 9 votes to none, with 2 abs­ tentions ( Jordan, Union of Soviet Soclalist Repub/ics). QUESTION RELATING TO TERRITORŒS UNDER PORTUGUESE ADMINISTRATION 38 Declsions At its 1250tli meeting, on 4 November 1965, the Council decided to invite the representatives of Portugal, Liberia, Tunisia, Madagascar and Sierra Leone to participate, without vote, in the discussion of the question. At .its 1255th meeting, on 10 November 1965, the Council decided to invite the representative of the 
analysis: This text appears to be a resolution passed by the United Nations Security Council, likely in response to a conflict or crisis between India and Pakistan. The language used suggests a focus on international relations, diplomacy, and conflict resolution, rather than economic, social, or environmental issues.