text: 153. Bot.h my Prime Minister and my Foreign Min- ister are now in an aircraft on the way to Paris to attend the Western summit meeting, In the circum- stances, my delegation feels constrained to request that the voting take place tomorrow rather than today. In saying tomorrow, I do not think that we have to wait until 7.15 p.m., 24 hours from now; the vote could perhaps take place a little earlier than that in’view of the urgency of the matter. 154. The PRESIDENT (interp~etrrtian~om Fwrvh): The representative of Japan has proposed deferring until tomorrow, though not for 24 hours, the vote on the draft resolution submitted by Panama and Spain. If there is no objection, I would suggest that we post- pone the vote on the draft resolution until our next meeting, which will take place tomorrow at a time to be set in consultation with the members of the Council. 155. Mr. TROYANOVSKY (Union of Soviet So- cialist Republics) (interpretutinn from Russian): I would suggest that we do not defer our decision on the timing of the next meeting. Rather, let us agree on the time right now. The representative of Japan has said that he does not need 24 hours, that he would need less time than that. Perhaps we could agree now to meet tomorrow morning. 156. The PRESIDENT (intalpr’cttrtion ,fi-om French): I thank the representative of the Soviet Union for his constructive statement, but if I understood the repre- sentative of Japan correctly, the time most suitable for him might perhaps be the early afternoon. Perhaps we could agree to meet at 3 p.m. tomorrow. 157. Mr. KAM (Panama) (interpr’etution ji-om Span- ish): My delegation is sympathetic to and under- standing of the difficulties or limitations other delegations might have in casting their votes on draft 
analysis: This text appears to be a record of a meeting or discussion between representatives of various countries, likely in a diplomatic or international organization. The language used is formal and diplomatic, and the topics discussed are related to the scheduling of a vote on a draft resolution. The discussion is focused on finding a suitable time for the vote, with no mention of specific policies or issues related to the categories listed. Therefore, it is likely that the category is related to the process or administration of international relations rather than a specific policy area.