text: 62. In reply to the question of the representative of the United States concerning the economies which might result from the deletion of the programme elements mentioned in subparagraphs (c) and (d) of paragraph 286 of the report of CPC, he / ... A/C.S/38/SR.26 English Page 13 (Mr. Foran) referred to Economic and Social Council resolution 1983/49 and stated that, at the time that that resolution had been adopted, it had been understood that the resources released by the deletion of those programme elements would be used for follow-up purposes. The adoption of the two CPC recommendations would therefore not lead to a reduction in the resources provided for that item. In reply to the question of the representative of the United Kingdom, he said that the total amount of the requirements for the official travel of SIDFAs was the same as in the budget for the previous biennium since, at the present stage, there were no plans to reduce the number of advisers. The estimates could be revised upwards or downwards in accordance with any change in the number of advisers. 63. Mr. HELLENBERG HUBAR (Netherlands) said he was of the view that, as suggested by the Industrial Development Board and CPC, the Joint Inspection Unit should undertake a study of co-ordination among United Nations bodies based in Vienna, with a view to eliminating duplication of activities. He would like to know whether the Joint Inspection Unit had included such a study in its work programme. His delegation, like that of the United Kingdom, wondered whether the Fifth Committee should not await a decision from the competent organs of the General Assembly on the SIDFA programme before taking a decision on the transfer of certain adviser posts to the regular UNIDO budget. He was, moreover, surprised that, according to the clarifications provided by the Controller, the deletion of the 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the budget and program elements of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), specifically the transfer of adviser posts and the deletion of certain program elements. It also mentions the Joint Inspection Unit and its potential study on coordination among UN bodies in Vienna. The language used is formal and technical, suggesting a focus on organizational and bureaucratic matters.