text: words "in which these bodies", had also been deleted. 2. Mr. STIRLING (United States of America) said that all the sponsors of draft resolution E/1986/L.23/Rev .1 represented the same ideological group and that it was their particular views that were reflected, and in an inappropriate manner, in the text, which failed to reflect the views of many other delegations, despite consultations. He objected to the entire concept of the International Year of Peace as used by the sponsors, and to the draft resolution's implicit censure of certain countries, especially his own. Declarations and propaganda were no substi­ tute for positive action. He therefore proposed that the draft resolution should be amended by deleting paragraphs 4, 5 and 6 and all of the preambular para_graphs except the seventh, and ending paragraph 1 w1th the word "Peace". 3. Mr. MAKSIMOV (Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic) said that the draft resolution did not contain propaganda. The preambular paragraphs were based on previous decisions of the General Assembly and other United Nations bodies and there was therefore no need to delete them. It was impor­ tant for the Council to adopt such a text concerning the tasks facing the United Nations in connection with the International Year of Peace. 4. Mr. STIRLING (United States of America) said that the Council had already discussed the Interna­ tional Year of Peace quite extensively and that a short draft resolution was all that was needed. He was surprise~ ~hat o~jectionable paragraphs still ap­ peared m It despite the fact that the contentious issues had already been discussed, and he objected to the conceptual basis of the resolution itself. 5. Mr. MAKSIMOV (Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic) said that in view of the radical and extensive nature of the proposed amendments to the draft resolution, he would consult with the sponsors 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing a draft resolution related to the International Year of Peace, and the speakers are debating the content and language used in the resolution. The focus is on the conceptual basis of the resolution, the inclusion of specific paragraphs, and the need for a concise and representative text. The speakers also mention the importance of the United Nations in connection with the International Year of Peace. Given this context, it seems likely that the category would be related to international relations or global issues.