text: Letter dated 1 October 1985 from the Permanent Representative of Angola to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council (S/17510) The meeting was called to order at 5 p.m. The Adoption of the agenda agenda was adopted. Complaint by Angola against South Africa: Letter dated 1 October 1985 from the Permanent Rep resentative of Angola to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council (S/17510) 1. The PRESIDENTz In accordance with decisions taken at the previous meetings on this item [2612th, 2614th and 2616th meetings], I invite the representative of Angola to take a place at the Council table; I invite the representa- tives of Afghanistan, Algeria, Botswana, Cameroon, Cuba, Ethiopia, Ghana, the Islamic Republic of Iran, Kuwait, Morocco, Mozambique, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Sen- egal, South Africa, Tunisia, the United Arab Emirates, the United Republic of Tanzania, Viet Nam, Yugoslavia, Zam- bia and Zimbabwe to take the places reserved for them at the side of the Council chamber. At the invitation of the President, Mr. de Figueiredo (Angola) took a place at the Council table: Mr. Zarif (Afghanistan), Mr. Taleb lbrahimi (Algeria), Mr. LegwaiIa (Botswana), Mr. Engo (Cameroon), Mr. Malmierca Peoli (Cuba), Mr. Woide (Ethiopia), Mr. Asamoah (Ghana), Mr. Rajaie-Khorassani (Islamic Republic of Iran), Mr. Abulhas- san (Kuwait), Mr. Alaoui (Morocco), Mr. dos Santos fMozambiaue). Mr. Chamorro Mora (Nicarana), Mr. Garba iNigeria), ‘Mr. Sarre (Senegal), Mr. ’ von S&it&ding (South Africa), Mr. Bouziri (Tunisia), Mr. AI-Shaali (United Arab Emirates), Mr. Majengo (united Republic of Tanzania), Mr. L.e Kim Chung (Viet Nam), Mr. Goiob (Yugoslavia), Mr, Lusaka (Zambia) and Mr. Mangwende (Zimbabwe) took the places reserved for them at the side of .the Council chamber. 2. The PRESIDENT: The first speaker is the representa- 
analysis: The text appears to be a meeting transcript of the United Nations Security Council, specifically discussing a complaint by Angola against South Africa. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting a discussion of a serious issue. The categories related to economic development, international trade, and humanitarian aid and relief seem less likely, as the text does not mention specific economic or trade issues. The categories related to health, education, employment, culture, and science and technology are also less likely, as they do not appear to be relevant to the complaint being discussed.