text: Paper 3/1990/Rev.l) should be annexed to the Committee's report rather than go into the file. 3. Ms. U~EJE (Rapporteur) observed that the working paper in question should not be included in the report because that would set an unfortunate precedent. Instead, it should go into the file for reference. 4. H~INEGIORG~, supported by Ms. EE~~RD, said that if the proposed recommendation were simply placed in the file, no one would know about it. She suggested therefore that if the recommendation was placed in the file, it should be accompanied by all the relevant documentation and a reference made to those materials in the Committee's report, indicating that they were available tor consultation. 5. Ms. OESER supported the suggestion and proposed that a paragraph should also be added to the report indicating precisely what proposals for future recommendations had been made, so as to make that knowledge public. 6. The CHAIRPERS~ confirmed that all draft proposals and the full documentation on female circumcision would be put in the file and that the report would indicate that they were available for consultation. 7. Ms~L~ requested clarification concerning the status of working papers that were not appended to the report of Working Group II, and specifically the proposal in Working Paper 3/1990/Add .6/Rev.l. 8. The CHAIRPERSQN said that every proposal on every subject would be put in the file and referred to in the report. The proposal in Working Paper )/1990/Add.6/Rev.l, however, would be included in the report. The report would indicate which proposals had been adopted and which had been deferred and placed on file. I. • • CEDAW/C/SR.169 English Page 3 9. Ms. TALLAWY said that the proposal in Working Paper 3/1990/Add.6/Rev.l, which the Committee had adopted, clearly reflected what the focus of the Committee's recommendations should be. 
analysis: The text appears to be a discussion among committee members about the inclusion of a working paper in a report. The paper in question is related to female circumcision, and the committee is deciding how to handle its recommendations and documentation. The discussion revolves around the need to make the proposals public and accessible for consultation. This suggests that the topic may fall under a category related to human rights or social issues.