text: Judgement No. 205, El-Naggar (1975) in which it stated: "The Tribunal observes that under Article 101 of th e Charter the power of appointment rests with the Secretary - General. The type of appointment to be offered to a staf f member is within the discretion of the Secretary-General . Neither the exceptional competence of a staff member no r favourable recommendations for a particular type of appointm ent by themselves create an entitlement to such an appointment . Furthermore, the Tribunal holds that its competence does no t extend to an examination of the reasons for the issue o r refusal of a particular type of appointment to a staff member in the absence of entitlements in this regard." 2.According to staff rule 104.12(a), the Tribunal notes tha t a probationary appointment is assigned a specific function; viz. to provide a career service in the U.N. XXIV.The Tribunal notes that under the umbrella of th e above-mentioned provisions, the Respondent invokes the establishe d policy not to grant a probationary appointment to anyone involved in a subsisting employment relati onship with another party, since a U.N. career service associated with a permanent appointment, i s inconsistent with a subsisting employment relationship with anothe r party. The Tribunal considers that this established policy is a reasonable interpretation of Staff Regulations and Rules regulatin g the granting of probationary appointments.- 19 - XXV.The Tribunal observes that there is no dispute that th e Applicant, at the time of his initial appointment, and throughout his employment with the United Nations, had been a permanent mem ber of the Civil Service of his Governmen t, at Tanta University, albeit on leave of absence. The Applicant had the right to revert to employment within his establishment of origin, Tanta University, and his instituti on had the
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the employment policies and procedures of the United Nations, specifically related to the appointment and reappointment of staff members. The language used is formal and legalistic, suggesting a focus on administrative and bureaucratic matters. The text does not mention specific industries, sectors, or geographic locations, but rather deals with general principles and regulations governing employment in the UN.