text: there was no conclusive evidence that Kurds were living in camps or that a part of the Shi'a population in the south had been forcibly displaced. He proposed that the paragraph should be deleted. 90. Mr. ALFONSO MARTINEZ recalled that he had referred earlier to the problem of the consequences for human rights of the use of force in international relations. It was very important to bear that in mind with regard to the recent events in the Gulf area. Obviously, any use of force in international relations had grave political consequences; it could lead to the disappearance of States or to the overthrow of Governments. The use of force should therefore be condemned everywhere; countries other than Kuwait had been invaded, too, but the international response had not been the same. E/CN.4/Sub.2/1990/SR.34 page 12 91. The text before the Sub-Commission was unbalanced. With regard to the third preambular paragraph, there was no proof of the Kurdish camps or of the forced displacement of part of the Shi'a population. He also had serious reservations regarding the appointment of a special rapporteur, as recommended in operative paragraph 4. That would lead to more problems than it would solve. The text of the draft resolution was based on humanitarian considerations, so it should reflect not only what the Security Council had already decided but also the view that an embargo on foodstuffs and medicine that reduced the civilian population to hunger was totally unacceptable. 92. The amendments proposed by Mr. Treat only increased his dissatisfaction with the text. With regard to what Mr. Eide had said, it was clear that not all the foreigners being held were Westerners, but the press was certainly placing much more emphasis on the situation of Europeans and North Americans than on that of people from other parts of the world. He requested that a 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing a draft resolution related to the Gulf War and its humanitarian consequences. It mentions the use of force, the displacement of populations, and the humanitarian situation in the region. The text also touches on the topic of the treatment of foreigners, including Westerners and people from other parts of the world. Given the focus on the Gulf War and its humanitarian implications, it seems likely that the text falls under the category of humanitarian aid and relief.