text: doubt whatsoever that the Secretary-General will con- duct the high-level meeting on 17 January with full respect for the juridical requirements which are inevita- bly involved because of the nature of the draft agree- ment which he himself has put forward. 98, I should be remiss if I did not present here certain reflections on the report of the Secretary-General. As the Secretary-General has pointed out quite aptly in section V of his report, since the meetings of 6 and 7 August, which led to the proximity talks which began on 10 September and were concluded on 12 December, this process that he initiated has taken place between two negotiating parties: the Turkish Cypriot commu- nity and the Greek Cypriot community. Neither of these was represented by persons claiming any State authority. The same will be true of the high-level meeting of 17 January next year. However, despite this fact, which has been so frequently repeated by the Secretary-General and is reiterated in his report, it is, to say the least, surprising to see-and, moreover, in the section dealing with these contacts-that the leader of the Greek Cypriot community is referred to as “President”. The Security Council is sufficiently familiar with the Turkish Cypriot and Turkish position regarding the imputing of this title to the leader of the Greek Cypriot community. Furthermore, that leader did not participate in that process while using that false title. My Government has tried to swallow this very regrettable error which crept into the report since we are quite convinced of the true position of the Sec- retary-General in this connection. Nevertheless, my Government believes that such errors should not be repeated in the future. 99. To revert to the resolution on UNFICYP just adopted by the Security Council, I am forced to note 
analysis: The text appears to be a diplomatic statement discussing a United Nations (UN) Secretary-General's report and a high-level meeting, mentioning the Turkish Cypriot and Greek Cypriot communities. It seems to focus on the political and jurisdictional aspects of the situation, highlighting the importance of accuracy in referring to the leaders of the communities. Given this context, it is likely that the text falls under a category related to international relations or governance.