text: report (A/38/7), differed from the $37.8 million given as the total for the 1984-1985 estimates in table 28M.3 of the proposed budget. 49. Mr. FORAN (Controller) said that the two figures differed because not all the administrative and common services at Vienna were shared by all the organizations. The table in the Advisory Committee's report showed the common services shared by the United Nations, IAEA, UNRWA and other organizations, whereas table 28M.3 of the proposed programme budget listed the administrative and common services requested, in a total amount of $37.8 million. Such items as Administrative Service, Finance and Personnel Services and Other general services related to the United Nations and its organizations, but not to IAEA or, in some cases, to UNRWA, which did not therefore share in their cost. 50. The CHAIRMAN invited the Committee to vote in first reading on section 28 of the proposed programme budget. 51. An appropriation of_$309 ,Q_2_§_,_5_Q_O_under__2__ection 28 for the biennium 1984-1985 was approved in first re~~i_!lg_by_75 vo_t~es to 8. 52. Mr. MICHALSKI (United States of America), speaking in explanation of vote, said that his delegation had intended to support the appropriation recommended by the Advisory Committee for section 28. However, because of the Fifth Committee's decision not to accept the recommendations of the Advisory Committee concerning the upqrading of two posts, his delegation had been obliged to vote against the appropriation. During the lengthy discussion of those reclassifications there had not been a single convincing argument which called into question the Advisory Committee's sound judgement. The Fifth Committee should not be involved in the question of individual reclassifications. When in doubt, it should depend on ACABQ, the expert body which advised it. 53. Mr. MURRAY (United Kingdom) said that, although his delegation had voted in 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the budget of the United Nations and its organizations, specifically the administrative and common services expenses. The categories mentioned, such as Vienna and IAEA, suggest an international organization or government setting. The language used is formal and technical, indicating a bureaucratic or administrative context.