text: 84. It was observed that the Working Group would have benefited if the compilation of comments had been available considerably earlier and if the documentation provided to it had been more comprehensive in comparing the standards incorporated in the draft Convention and the language used therein with the standards and language of existing binding United Nations instruments. The lack of input from some relevant organisations, most notably the Jnternational Labour Office, to the technical review was noted. The representative of Australia, supported by several other representatives including those of the United States and Norway, stated that the Secretary-General should give more priority to the preparation of such technical reviews, not only because it was important to elaborate the best possible instruments from a technical viewpoint but also to ensure the maintenance of a , .- coherent system of international human rights instruments. 85. While supporting the statement made by the representative of Australia, the representative of the Netherlands expressed his gratitude to the Chairman and the Vice-Chairman for having led the Working Group through the process of a technical review in a fast and most efficient way. Given the circumstances, the Working Group had done everything possible to improve the text. Nevertheless, the technical review had been too limited in nature for the reasons already expressed. He also felt obliged to state some doubts about the way in which the Secretary-General, owing to the limited resources available, had been able to support the work of the Working Group during the present sesaion. 86. The representative of the Federal Republic of Germany nevertheless reiterated the general concerns regarding the draft Convention which his delegation had expressed on a number of occasions during the second reading. 87. The representative of Norway further expressed his appreciation to the 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the process of drafting a convention, specifically the Working Group's review of the draft and the Secretary-General's role in supporting the process. The concerns expressed are related to the technical aspects of the review, the availability of documentation, and the input from relevant organizations. This suggests that the category should be related to international cooperation or governance.