text: participate in that force, but a super-Power, a per- manent member of the Council and an ally of the United Kingdom in this conflict, would participate in it. 65. Thus, one can quite clearly see the constant line which the Government of the United Kingdom has followed as its policy with regard to this serious question: threat and aggression. 66. This behaviour began with the usurpation in 1833 and the expulsion of the Argentine inhabitants of the islands. It was repeated this year when the E~tc~urctrtw was sent to the South Georgia islands to expel the Argentine workers. It was &affirmed by the presence of nuclear submarines in the same region, the launching of the punitive fleet and the declaration Of illegal blockades. And it persists today through all kinds of military actions, attacks and bombings, which have already sowed death and destruction. 67. At the conclusion of the meeting of the Council on 26 May [2S68rh meting], we said that the Secre- tary-General was being given a mission which de- pended solely on the positive attitude of the parties. 68. That mission, as the Council knows, ended with the British ultimatum to which I have referred. We now see the latest British claim, which reveals the true purpose that now guides the United Kingdom: a~ international security agreement on the islands which would include the participation of United States forces in order to perpetuate the violation of the territorial integrity of my country. This is sadly reminiscent of other situations, such as that of Guantanamo, and is dangerously similar to the cases of Diego Garcia and Ascension Island. The Coun- cil should not forget that the latter island is the key point for aggression against Argentina. We all know what these situations of force mean for third-world countries. 
analysis: The text appears to be a political statement or speech, addressing a conflict between Argentina and the United Kingdom over the Falkland Islands. It highlights the aggressive actions of the UK government and the presence of a superpower, the United States, in the conflict. The text also references international organizations, such as the Council, and international agreements, like security agreements. These elements suggest that the text is focused on international politics and diplomacy rather than a specific economic, social, or cultural issue.