text: w-dent or praxdure, you preferred to d8ny IW that privileg8. However, I am pleaned that kay colleague, the repcewntative of Cubs, highlighted the illegal aemct of that resolution. That i8 Ay I shall be vary brief in explaining why it is illegal under the Charter. J8/16 s/?v. 2938 67-M (spoke in Arabic) (Mr. Al-Anbari, Iraq) Security Council resolution 665 (1990) is unjustifiable. It contradicts itself. Security Council resolution 661 (1990) is based on Article 41 oE the Charter, which clearly states that no force should be anployed to qive eEfect to economic measures decided by the Security Council. That reservation is emphasized by the fact that five members of the Security Council which voted in favour of the resolution cx abstained from voting on it expressed do.*bts about its applicability and appropriateness. The fact is that olir lolleagus, the representative of the PeopLe’s Republic of China, frankly stated that he had voted in favour OF the resolution while wnvinced that it does not authorise the use of force to implement the measures provided fcx in resolution 661 (1990). Hwever, at the sams time, we hestd several representatives warn of the need to keep use of force at a minillue a necessary level. Such contradictions refl@t the pressures exerted on the smmbers of the Security Council ta adopt an unjustifi.able resolution. The resolution wmmits an even scar+ dangerous oontravention. Any use of focce in accordance with the Charter falls under provisions of Article 42 and is governed by subsequent articles, Particularly since those articles limit the use of force b the Security Council, in co-operation with the Military Staff Committee, in accordance with agreements made by the Security Council with trmpoontributing States, whose troops are thereafter placed under the authority of the United Nations. We my well won&r here why the sponsors nf IW+~~I*+(A.. CCC I1abn* sir+? IyJ ian ____^_--,. -“d ,*rru, 
analysis: The text appears to be a speech or statement made by a representative of Iraq at the United Nations Security Council, likely discussing the legality and implications of economic sanctions imposed on Iraq. The language used is formal and technical, referencing specific articles of the United Nations Charter and Security Council resolutions. The content focuses on the legitimacy of these sanctions and the potential consequences of their enforcement.