text: Such theories were no more than a device to justify the inability of certain States to fulfil their obligations under the Covenant, mainly because of the priority they gave to private profit at the expense of social security and social justice. His delegation therefore believed that the States parties, particularly those facing unemployment and social inequality, should concentrate on eliminating violations of economic, social and cultural rights and not to try to change the administrative and procedural practices of the working Group or the machinery for implementing the Covenant. 60. His delegation had closely studied document A/39/484 concerning the meeting of the chairmen of the four human rights bodies held recently in Geneva, and was dissatisfied with how the meeting had been organized and conducted, as well as wi~ its results. First of all, such a meeting was not representative because the chairmen of the organs concerned could not be considered representatives of those organs or of the States parties to the relevant ir1struments, especially with respect to questions on which there was no unanimity, or to the implementation of I ... A/C. 3/39/SR.49 English Page 17 {Mr. Mitrev, Bulgaria) those instruments, which was solely within the competence of the States parties. In the final analysis, the chairmen could represent only their own Governments or offer their personal views as experts. Secondly, the meeting was held without the participation of all the chairmen of the bodies entrusted with the consideration of reports under the relevant human rights instruments, since the Chairperson of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against women and the Chairman-Rapporteur of the Group of Three on apartheid had not been invited to participate. That mistake had been aggravated by the participation of the Chairman of the Commission on Human Rights, which could not be considered a "body entrusted 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing international human rights and the implementation of treaties and conventions. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting that it may be related to a government or international organization. The text mentions specific bodies and committees, such as the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, which suggests a focus on human rights and social issues.