text: rhraricrl LIII...-,~P rnA r\f ferehor tnerrnrclnn.1 rrchmnaa rrf A-6. 4” r......-rca.... -ICI. - _ - - . . - - - - - -E - __ - --- -- --- -..-- ------_-_------ -‘-------7-- “_ ..--- -.. -” . . . . e..La”.. “IL.. the negotiations on such a multilateral convention; welcomed the offer by the French Government to convene in Paris from 7 to 11 January 1989 a conference of the States parties to the Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of I... A/45/ 100 English Page 167 Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare, signed at Geneva on 17 June 1925, and of other interested Statesr and enpressed the hope that all States would contribu:e actively to the objectives of the conference (resolution 43174 C). At its forty-fourth session, a/ the General Assembly noted with satisfaction the work of the Conference on Disarmament during its 1989 session regarding the prohibition of chemical weapons, and, in particular, appreciated the progress in the work of its u Committee on Chemical Weapons on that question and the tangible results recorded in its report; noted, while regretting that a convention on the prohibition of the development, production, stockpiling and use of chemical weapons and on their destruction had not yet been concluded, that there existed an ever-growing will to resolve the pending problems at the earliest possible date; again urged the Conference on Disarmament, as a matter of high priority, to intensify, during its 1990 session , which would be of pivotal importance, the negotiations on such a convention and to reinforce its efforts further by, inter, increasing the time that it devotes to such negotiations, taking into account all existing proposals and future initiatives, with a view to the final elaboration of a convention et the earliest possible date, and to re-establish its Ad Hoc Committee on Chemical Weapons for that purpose with the mandate to be agreed upon by the Conference at the beginning of its 1990 sessionr requested the 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing international diplomacy and negotiations related to the prohibition of chemical weapons. The language used is formal and official, with references to the United Nations General Assembly and the Conference on Disarmament. The text does not mention economic development, natural resources, agriculture, industry, transport, communication, international trade, health, education, employment, or humanitarian aid. It does not seem to be related to culture or science and technology either. The focus on international agreements and diplomatic efforts suggests that the most fitting categories are related to international relations.