text: verification centre at Estelí. The totals of armed and unarmed members of the Nicaragu-.n Resistance who were demobilized at each of the above locations are set out in a;!nex II to the present report. 5, Members of the Nicaraguan Resistance were deemed to be armed if they presented themselves for demobilization with a weapon or some other item of ordnance, such as mines or hand gtenades. Individuals not so equipped were considered to be members of the Nicaraguan Resistance, and therefore eligible for demobiliaation, if they were in uniform and had been certified by a commander of a Resistance unit as beiag mcmbers of the Nicaraguan Resistance. Some of these personnel were wounded or disabled ex-combatants: others were said to have served in the Nicaraguan Resistance in a non-combatant capacity (e.g., logistics support). 6. Annex III to the present report sets out totals for the different categories of weapons that were handed over by the members of the Nicaraguan Resistance in Honduras and Nicaragua respectively, up to and including 28 June 1990. These were destroyed on the spot by ONUCA, as agreed. ONUCA was informed both by senfor officers of the Nicaraguan Army and by the leaders of the Nicaraguan Resistance themselves that the Resistance had always been a lightly armed and mobile forte that hardly ever deployed heavy weapons inside Nicaragua. ONUCA nevertheless paid special attention to two categories of heavy weapons that were reported to be ia the possession of the Nicaraguan Resistance, namely heavy machine-quns and surface-to-air missiles. 7, As indicated in annex III, four heavy machine-guns were handed in. The leader of the Northern Front confirmed to ONUCA that his front had received heavy machine-guns in the past but said that they had been used only for the defence of 
analysis: This text appears to be a report on the demobilization of the Nicaraguan Resistance, a political and military movement. The text focuses on the verification process, the categories of weapons handed over, and the destruction of these weapons. This suggests that the text is related to a specific historical event or conflict, rather than a general topic like economic development or natural resources.