text: Communist Party in China was to be distinguished from that of the Government, and it seemed to him that the information provided regarding the leadership of central and local legislative and administrative organs was adequate. The documents prepared by the Commission on Human Rights, for example, or the one hand, and by non-governmental organizations on the other, were of course open to varying interpretations, but he did not think it justifiable to assume that the information provided by Governments was incorrect or misleading simply because of its source. Although Tibetans had their own national identity, which the Chinese Government endeavoured to foster, Tibet was an integral part of the People's Republic of China over which the Government exercised, not suzerainty -as J~~ speaker had claimed -but sovereignty. CERD/C/SR.871 page 10 The aim of the policy of introducing new place names was to promote respect for national culture, but he agreed that it should not be pursued coercively. In conclusion, he said that he would transmit to his Government the requests made by members of the Committee for additional information, and that their suggestions would be taken into account when the next periodic report was being prepared. Mr. FERRERO COSTA asked that particular attention in the next report should be given to those questions to which replies had not been forthcoming during the consideration of the current reports. The CHAIRMAN said that, taken together with the discussion in the Committee, the report's submitted by China and the statements made by the Chinese representatives provided a balanced overall picture of the situation regarding implementation of the Convention in that country. The Committee had thus concluded its deliberations on the third and fourth periodic reports of China. Mr. Fan Guoxiang and Mr. Wu Shimin (China) withdrew. 
analysis: The text appears to be a report on a country's compliance with a human rights convention, discussing issues such as government representation, national identity, cultural promotion, and sovereignty. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting that it is an official document. The topics discussed are not related to economic development, natural resources, or industry, but rather focus on governance, identity, and human rights.