text: 1981 t0 Pakistan and Iran objective and realistic ways of solvinq the problems throuqh talks. The DRA is ready for neqotiations. The international prestiqe of the DRAB which is recoqnized by about one hundred countries, is on the increase. We attach qreat hopes to the results of the sixth round of the Geneva talks. The people of AEqhanistan are well aware that Your Excellency, the Secretary-General of the United Nations, has an outstandinq role in preparinq the qrounds for the neqotiations, but imperialism and hegemonism are qivinq millions of dollars to the leaders of the counter-revolutionary bands to bribe Afqhan fuqitivcs to fight aqainst their own people. Pakistani generals seek their existence in the continuation of the bloody war and are infringing all norms of international law to obtain dollars, pounds and armament. Today the Pashtun tribes have fully realized the danqerous consequences of the war-monqecinq policy oE the military regime of Pakistan and will struqqle with all their might in order to prevent the conversion of their territory into a battlefield. The Pashtuns and Baluches will not permit the bandits and murderers onto their soil. Your Excellency is well aware of what goes on in the so-called refugee camps on the territories of Pakistan and Iran. A large number of the fuqitives are kept in the camps by the force of bayonets, while these deceived individuals want to return to the folds of the motherland by availing themselves of the amnesty decree of the Presidium of Revolutionary Council of the DRA. The reactionary regimes and leaders of the bands are preventinq them from returning, by the force of arms. There is ample evidence provinq this fact. / . . . R/40/G75 s/17490 EnqIish PaqP 4 The deal3 which are conductetl by Pakisbn and lran on behalf of Afqhan 
analysis: The text appears to be a political statement or a diplomatic communiqué, focusing on the conflict between Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iran. It highlights the issues of war, refugees, and the role of the United Nations, but does not mention economic development, natural resources, or environmental concerns. It also does not discuss agriculture, industry, transport, health, education, employment, or culture. The text seems to be more focused on the political and humanitarian aspects of the conflict.