text: wished to impose at the negotiating table, which would have included our renouncing OUT rights. 85. In other words, the interim system would not end until the United Kingdom so desired, We believe that that may have been their intention: that the pro- ViSiOnal administration could go on without being defined. 86. The persistent utilization of force by the United Kingdom has as a backdrop extremely serious attitudes that serve as a context for this question. The impas- sive attitude which has attended the escalation of violence, publicized and designed by the United Kingdom which clearly runs counter to the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations and Council resolution 502 (1982), is encouraged by the military and economic support directly provided by other countries. 87. There can be no doubt that behind all British reasoning and the recalcitrant attitude it has maintained throughout this lengthy process there is an attempt on the part of a permanent member of the Security Council to maintain and increase its military presence in the South Atlantic, a region which does not cor- respond to any of its legitimate interests. X8. This cannot be accepted by the United Nations or the Council, unless the United Nations is prepared to accept imperialism. 89. It is still early to draw full conclusions from everything that is happening. None the less, one thing appears with eternal clarity: the entire world wants peace; it does not want an escalation of violence: it wants a negotiated solution and the strengthening of the spirit of genuine negotiation; it does not want any evasion of the issues in the dispute, issues which are none other than an attempt to perpetuate colonial domination and a foreign presence, in violation of the territorial integrity of a nation which is a Member of 
analysis: The text appears to be a diplomatic document discussing the ongoing conflict between the United Kingdom and Argentina over the Falkland Islands (Malvinas). The language used is formal and diplomatic, with references to international law, the United Nations, and the Security Council. The text highlights the use of force by the United Kingdom, the violation of territorial integrity, and the desire for a negotiated solution. Given the context, it is likely that the text is related to international relations and conflict resolution.