text: It Ls Ferhaps also due to tlre inherent rese'nations found ln the C?tarter ltself which contemplated the decisions of the General Assenbly ln the sphere of internatlonal peace and securltiz to be no irbre th an ef a recormendatory character under ttre provisions of Article 11. The only obser'\ratlon which may be offere<l in tlris conrection 1s that pe lhails it may be ?orthwhile to attempt Certain changes ln practice j.n tackllng the lssues on D ls arnrane nt and relat€d matters to 3nsure that the rsconmendatlons do not becorne a part of a €tereo-typed process.. whilst tt ls irnportant thtt the issues like "General and complete disarmament,r or ,, Prohlbition of nucLear or t}Lrnrcnucl.ear tests,, otr a ban on the use of . nrclear rre apons remsin on the agrenda of each sesslon to monltor progress, lt 1s for consideration whether tln cer:era.L Assenbly should repeat lts recorrnendatlons even on these topics year after year basl-cally ln sirnilar tesns.. The re appears to have been sore kind of feellng'that unless a resolutlon of a substantive characteE is adopted after dlscusslon of an iEm, 1ts lmportance vrould be lost and also that lf a fresh resolution was not passed after extens ive debates at a sesslon the previ.ous reso- lutlon on ttre same subJect woul,d be deemed to have lapsed. TlrE ls perhaps now ripe to revle$/ the matter. It may perhaps be a matter for conslderation whether resolutlons of a substantl-ve nature shouLd not 1n future be reser-rred for occaslons ofr partlcul ar signi.flcance no\^, that tl,!€ ge neral prlnclples governing the conduct of states have already been establlshed and trel1 settled in the resolutlons adoFtea in the past. the speclflc occaslons when ttreA/40/7?.6 Engl tEh Page 35 General Assembly may consider adopting resolutlons in tlre same areag covereC. in the prevlous ones coulC be
analysis: The text appears to be discussing international relations and diplomatic efforts, specifically the General Assembly's role in promoting international peace and security. The language used is formal and diplomatic, with references to international agreements, resolutions, and decisions. The text also touches on the idea of reviewing and revising previous resolutions, which suggests a focus on international governance and diplomacy.