text: 7. By operative paragraph 7 of draft resolution IV, the Economic and Social Council would authorize the Committee on Crime Prevention and Control to continue its practice of convening a pre-sessional working group for two days before each session. 8. The Committee would convene its next pre-sessional working group for two days immediately before the twelfth session of the Committee, which is scheduled for 1992 in Vienna. The working group would be entitled to interpretation in the six official languages of the United Nations. The actual interpretation requirements would depend on the composition of the five-person working group. No pre-session or in-session documentation would be necessary, but one post-session document of approximately 25 pages would be required. Also, an additional payment of daily subsistence allowance would be required for each of the five members of the pre-sessional working group for a total of four days. 9. The full cost estimate for the additional two-day meeting is as follows: Vienna, 1992 ($US) Additional subsistence allowance for five members of the working group 4 200 I Л уч о Q •L ¿A У • Meeting servicing (four meetings: A, C, E, F, R, S) 27 100 Post-session documentation (25 pages: A, C, E, F, R, S) 33 200 Total 64 500 10. Should the draft resolution be adopted, provision would be made in the proposed programme budget for the biennium 1992-1993 for the additional subsistence allowance and conference-servicing costs required for a two-day meeting of the pre-sessional working group. III. PROGRAMME BUDGET IMPLICATIONS OF DRAFT RESOLUTION VII ON EDUCATION, TRAINING AND PUBLIC AWARENESS IN THE FIELD OF CRIME PREVENTION A. Requests contained in draft resolution VII 11. By operative paragraph 1 of draft resolution VII, the Economic and Social Council would recommend the establishment of a comprehensive programme of work so 
analysis: The text appears to be discussing administrative and budgetary aspects of a United Nations committee, specifically the Committee on Crime Prevention and Control. The language used is formal and technical, suggesting a focus on organizational and procedural matters rather than a specific policy area. The mention of a "pre-sessional working group" and "conference-servicing costs" further reinforces this interpretation.