text: of the present conflict, Heedless and impatient. England refused to carry out its international obliga- tion to preserve peace. Thus, we have a story of intran- sigence and violence by the United Kingdom. 82. As President Luis Herrera Campins said: “While it is true that, as the Charter of the United Nations states, one may presume that the aggt’es- sor is the person who first resorts to force, SUL.I a conclusion is not inevitable but a mere presumption. “Violence and force adopt subtle methods in order to hold sway. The neglect, disregard, unplcas- antness and, on many occasions., even contempt shown for years in the face of the proposals and claims of the weakest addressed to the most powerful are part of these subtle forms of violence. “Peaceful efforts to solve the problems have come up against the indifference of the international community and the peevishness of the powerful who have normally involved themselves in these disputes. The weak nations see that the strong can use force with impunity, They are helpless wit- nesses of the prolongation of conflicts sustained by powerful countries, This state of affairs constitutes encouragement of the use of force.” 83.’ The international community is witnessing with amazement and indignation acts of aggression com- mitted by a Government which has the gall to violate the very norms which it promoted. including those which it arbitrarily established unilaterally. Indeed. the British Government proposed the text for Caun- cil resolution SO2 (1982) and staked out a war zone around the Malvinns Islands which its own forces with utter treachery then procccdcd to violate. The dis- patch of the aggressive fleet and the criminal sinking of the cruiser C(gnc~~*tr/ Rl~lgr~rr~o outside the exclusion zone, which, totally contrary to law, had been cstab- lishcd by the United Kingdom, arc clearest proof of 
analysis: The text appears to be a political statement or a diplomatic document, discussing the conflict between the United Kingdom and another country (likely Argentina) over the Malvinas Islands. The language used is formal and critical, with a focus on the actions of the British Government and the international community. The text does not mention any specific economic, social, or environmental issues.