text: authorities of that country with a view to the execution of a judicial decision, or wanted on account of flearensm, or against whom a court order or deportation order has been issued by the authorities of the host country.” - 238 -provision was justified by the functional approach to privileges and immunities and that it was a safeguard against possible abuses. 457, As to the wording, it was suggested that the article should refer not only to the headquarters &.~~&LJUJUU, but also to the premises of the organisation in general. It was aiso pointed out that it might be advisable to omit the reference to persons “wanted on account of SW”, since such a concept did not eriat in every legal system. 458, Other members, however, thought that article 9 was unnecessary and counter-productive. It was unnecessary because the fact that it was impossible for the organisation to grant refuge to the persons referred to in it stemmed from the functional nature of privileges and immunities that was embodied in other articles. And it was counter-productive because it could be invoked to prevent an interaational organisation from granting refuge in justifiable cases, for example in the case cf persons wanted strictly for political reasons , where refuge or asylum made it possible to protect a fundamental human right, such as the right to life or physical integrity. 459, With regard to ar!:lcle 10, JJ# some members expressed reservations about the breadth of the privileges and immunities provided therein. They 2.w Article 10, as proposed by the Special Rapporteur, read as followsr Without beirg restricted by controls, inspections, regulations or moratoria of any kind, (a) International organisations may hold funds, gold or currency of any kind and operate benk accounts in any currencyI (b) International organisations may freely transfer their funds,
analysis: The text appears to be discussing the privileges and immunities of international organizations, specifically in relation to the execution of judicial decisions, fugitives, and court orders. The language used suggests a focus on international relations, law, and governance, which may not be directly related to a specific economic or social sector.