Given the statement 'The screener should have resolved what set off the alarm; and in the case of both Moqed and Hazmi, it was clear that he did not.', is 'The screener did not resolve what set off the alarm.' neither a logical follow-up nor a contradiction?
The screener should have resolved what set off the alarm; and in the case of both Moqed and Hazmi, it was clear that he did not.###The screener did not resolve what set off the alarm.