Given the context of 'Perhaps all we can say of great acting is that it involves assimilation rather than accumulation, that the performer isn't so much a surrogate as a vessel.', does 'A mediocre performer with a lot of roles can still be considered great.' emerge logically?
Perhaps all we can say of great acting is that it involves assimilation rather than accumulation, that the performer isn't so much a surrogate as a vessel.###A mediocre performer with a lot of roles can still be considered great.