Considering the premise 'The screener should have resolved what set off the alarm; and in the case of both Moqed and Hazmi, it was clear that he did not.', is 'The screener has a history of not resolving what set off the alarm.' a statement that stands on its own?
The screener should have resolved what set off the alarm; and in the case of both Moqed and Hazmi, it was clear that he did not.###The screener has a history of not resolving what set off the alarm.