Given the statement 'It was here in 1952 that King Farouk signed his abdication before boarding his yacht for exile in Italy.', is 'King Farouk was exiled because of the dangerous condition in Egypt at the time.' neither a logical follow-up nor a contradiction?
It was here in 1952 that King Farouk signed his abdication before boarding his yacht for exile in Italy.###King Farouk was exiled because of the dangerous condition in Egypt at the time.