If we start with 'If there is something wrong, it behooves us to get at the roots of the problem, not to flail about wildly, for only after the source of a disease has been identified can one properly investigate its cure.', does it make sense to conclude with 'If something is wrong, we must get to the root of it to decipher a cure. '
If there is something wrong, it behooves us to get at the roots of the problem, not to flail about wildly, for only after the source of a disease has been identified can one properly investigate its cure.###If something is wrong, we must get to the root of it to decipher a cure. 