Does 'However, what emerged were almost invariably autocratic regimes that were usually unwilling to tolerate any opposition-even in countries, such as Egypt, that had a parliamentary tradition.' stand independently of the premise 'Te regimes were unwilling to tolerate any opposition even if the country voted on some things.', neither following nor contradicting it?
However, what emerged were almost invariably autocratic regimes that were usually unwilling to tolerate any opposition-even in countries, such as Egypt, that had a parliamentary tradition.###Te regimes were unwilling to tolerate any opposition even if the country voted on some things.