Given the statement 'Bloomer (for `flower'), butter (for `ram'), or even flower (for `river') are recurrent examples, but solvers must always be on the alert for new traps of this ', is 'These words typically don't rationally relate to one another. ' neither a logical follow-up nor a contradiction?
Bloomer (for `flower'), butter (for `ram'), or even flower (for `river') are recurrent examples, but solvers must always be on the alert for new traps of this ###These words typically don't rationally relate to one another. 