Given the assertion 'New York 's John Leonard calls Oz an ecology and anthropology of terror, not for the faint of heart or the queasy of stomach ...', does 'Chicago's John Leonard calls Oz a biology and anthology of horror.' offer a contrary position?
New York 's John Leonard calls Oz an ecology and anthropology of terror, not for the faint of heart or the queasy of stomach ...###Chicago's John Leonard calls Oz a biology and anthology of horror.