Given 'Civil libertarians denounced it as an improper church-state partnership, a sectarian scheme to milk the taxpayer, and a feel-good diversion from the rest of the coalition's agenda.', can 'Civil libertarians have celebrated the partnership's role in supporting the coalition's core agenda.' be seen as maintaining a distinct, neutral position?
Civil libertarians denounced it as an improper church-state partnership, a sectarian scheme to milk the taxpayer, and a feel-good diversion from the rest of the coalition's agenda.###Civil libertarians have celebrated the partnership's role in supporting the coalition's core agenda.