Based on the premise 'For example, in the OLW lexicon, when two people'sometimes but not always a man and a woman'agree that they Lword one another, they often enter into one of the Cwords , which leads perhaps eventually to the M-word , which in turn authorizes them to F-word with the sanction of church and state.', does it logically lead to the hypothesis 'The OLW lexicon uses blatantly offensive and crass language.'
For example, in the OLW lexicon, when two people'sometimes but not always a man and a woman'agree that they Lword one another, they often enter into one of the Cwords , which leads perhaps eventually to the M-word , which in turn authorizes them to F-word with the sanction of church and state.###The OLW lexicon uses blatantly offensive and crass language.