Does 'Salem al Hazmi cleared the metal detector and was permitted through; Nawaf al Hazmi set off the alarms for both the first and second metal detectors and was then hand-wanded before being passed.' stand independently of the premise 'Nawaf al Hazmi didn't have any metal on his person.', neither following nor contradicting it?
Salem al Hazmi cleared the metal detector and was permitted through; Nawaf al Hazmi set off the alarms for both the first and second metal detectors and was then hand-wanded before being passed.###Nawaf al Hazmi didn't have any metal on his person.