Given the statement 'words = terms (synonym) perverse = flag for anagram anagram of `terms' = MSTER the first person = ADAM without = outside (!) ADAM outside MSTER = AMSTERDAM', is 'MSTER does not equate to AMSTERDAM. ' neither a logical follow-up nor a contradiction?
words = terms (synonym) perverse = flag for anagram anagram of `terms' = MSTER the first person = ADAM without = outside (!) ADAM outside MSTER = AMSTERDAM###MSTER does not equate to AMSTERDAM. 