Does the hypothesis 'Die-cutters are much safer when fully automated, but building computerized loading and unloading features into the machine adds cost.' logically conflict with the premise 'Fully automated die-cutters are extremely dangerous and should be avoided at all costs.'
Die-cutters are much safer when fully automated, but building computerized loading and unloading features into the machine adds cost.###Fully automated die-cutters are extremely dangerous and should be avoided at all costs.