Does 'By the autumn of 1993, U.S. commanders concluded that the main source of trouble was a warlord, Mohammed Farrah Aidid.' stand independently of the premise 'US commanders decided Aidid was the biggest source of trouble while they were operating in Iraq.', neither following nor contradicting it?
By the autumn of 1993, U.S. commanders concluded that the main source of trouble was a warlord, Mohammed Farrah Aidid.###US commanders decided Aidid was the biggest source of trouble while they were operating in Iraq.