Is there a direct logical conflict between the premise and the hypothesis? Premise: But it is patently ridiculous to refer to someone whose sex is known as a chairperson .  Chair should be reserved for the office of the chairperson, not the person holding the office. Hypothesis: People who call someone whose sex is known a chairperson don't think about that.
But it is patently ridiculous to refer to someone whose sex is known as a chairperson .  Chair should be reserved for the office of the chairperson, not the person holding the office.###People who call someone whose sex is known a chairperson don't think about that.