Does 'Despite all the hoopla over a pro-choice advocate's confession that he had lied about the circumstances under which the procedure is generally used, only five lawmakers switched their votes from no to yes.' neither support nor refute 'The pro-choice advocate's admission to lying about the circumstances of the procedure didn't seem to matter to most lawmakers.', instead existing independently?
Despite all the hoopla over a pro-choice advocate's confession that he had lied about the circumstances under which the procedure is generally used, only five lawmakers switched their votes from no to yes.###The pro-choice advocate's admission to lying about the circumstances of the procedure didn't seem to matter to most lawmakers.