Based on the premise 'In parallel with the roots of onomatopoeia (onoma `name' + poiein `to make or do') I have christened the effect  onoma again + pladzein `to mislead or deceive.', does it logically lead to the hypothesis 'I have not christened the effect of onoma again'
In parallel with the roots of onomatopoeia (onoma `name' + poiein `to make or do') I have christened the effect  onoma again + pladzein `to mislead or deceive.###I have not christened the effect of onoma again