Does 'If there is something wrong, it behooves us to get at the roots of the problem, not to flail about wildly, for only after the source of a disease has been identified can one properly investigate its cure.' logically negate the premise 'If something is wrong, we must get to the root of it to decipher a cure. '
If there is something wrong, it behooves us to get at the roots of the problem, not to flail about wildly, for only after the source of a disease has been identified can one properly investigate its cure.###If something is wrong, we must get to the root of it to decipher a cure. 