Given the premise, is the hypothesis an unavoidable conclusion? Premise: NIPA had already recognized mineral exploration as investment, and in 1996, NIPA reclassified government purchases of plant and equipment as investment. Hypothesis: NIPA said mineral exploration is an investment.
NIPA had already recognized mineral exploration as investment, and in 1996, NIPA reclassified government purchases of plant and equipment as investment.###NIPA said mineral exploration is an investment.