In response to 'Since The Bell Curve was published, it has become clear that almost everything about it was inexcusably  suspect data, mistakes in statistical procedures that would have flunked a sophomore (Murray--Herrnstein is deceased--clearly does not understand what a correlation coefficient means), deliberate suppression of contrary evidence, you name it.', does 'The Bell Curve authors made up some of their conclusions to bolster their hypothesis.' serve as a counterstatement?
Since The Bell Curve was published, it has become clear that almost everything about it was inexcusably  suspect data, mistakes in statistical procedures that would have flunked a sophomore (Murray--Herrnstein is deceased--clearly does not understand what a correlation coefficient means), deliberate suppression of contrary evidence, you name it.###The Bell Curve authors made up some of their conclusions to bolster their hypothesis.