Is there a neutral relationship between 'If there is something wrong, it behooves us to get at the roots of the problem, not to flail about wildly, for only after the source of a disease has been identified can one properly investigate its cure.' and 'Don't try to getvto the root of the problem, the answer is on the surface. ', lacking direct logical ties?
If there is something wrong, it behooves us to get at the roots of the problem, not to flail about wildly, for only after the source of a disease has been identified can one properly investigate its cure.###Don't try to getvto the root of the problem, the answer is on the surface. 