Given the premise, is the hypothesis presenting a conflicting viewpoint? Premise: Strange as it may seem to the typical household, capital gains on its existing assets do not contribute to saving as measured in NIPA. Hypothesis: NIPA considers cat fur when it defines savings.
Strange as it may seem to the typical household, capital gains on its existing assets do not contribute to saving as measured in NIPA.###NIPA considers cat fur when it defines savings.