In the context of 'For instance, mandatory account proposals are more likely to increase private saving because such a program would require households that do not currently save-such as many low-income individuals or families-to place some amount in an individual account.', does 'Mandatory account proposals are likely to increase savings by forcing people to save.' serve as a direct counterargument?
For instance, mandatory account proposals are more likely to increase private saving because such a program would require households that do not currently save-such as many low-income individuals or families-to place some amount in an individual account.###Mandatory account proposals are likely to increase savings by forcing people to save.