Does the hypothesis 'The screener should have resolved what set off the alarm; and in the case of both Moqed and Hazmi, it was clear that he did not.' logically conflict with the premise 'The screener has a history of not resolving what set off the alarm.'
The screener should have resolved what set off the alarm; and in the case of both Moqed and Hazmi, it was clear that he did not.###The screener has a history of not resolving what set off the alarm.