Does 'For a review of the literature, see William G. Gale and John Sabelhaus, Perspectives on the Household Saving Rate, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (1:1999), pp. 181-224.' neither support nor refute 'References used in this instance include Gale/Sabelhaus, Perspectives on the Household Saving Rate, which is available for review.', instead existing independently?
For a review of the literature, see William G. Gale and John Sabelhaus, Perspectives on the Household Saving Rate, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (1:1999), pp. 181-224.###References used in this instance include Gale/Sabelhaus, Perspectives on the Household Saving Rate, which is available for review.