A self learning system and a method for analyzing the sentiments conveyed by an input text have been disclosed. The system includes a generator that generates an initial training set comprising a plurality of words linked to corresponding sentiments. The words and corresponding sentiments are stored in a repository. A rule based classifier segregates the input text into individual words, and compares the words with the entries in the repository, and subsequently determines a first score corresponding to the input text. The input text is also provided to a machine-learning based classifier that generates a plurality of features corresponding to the input text and subsequently generates a second score corresponding to the input text. The first score and the second score are further aggregated by an ensemble classifier which further generates a classification score indicative of the sentiment conveyed by the input text.
Please help me write a proper abstract based on the patent claims. CLAIM: 1. A computer implemented self learning system for analyzing the sentiments conveyed by an input text, said system comprising: a generator configured to generate an initial training set, said initial training set comprising a plurality of words, wherein each of said words are linked to a corresponding sentiment; a repository communicably coupled to said generator, and configured to store each of said words and corresponding sentiments; a rule based classifier cooperating with said generator and said repository, said rule based classifier configured to receive the input text and segregate the input text into a plurality of words, said rule based classifier still further configured to compare each of said plurality of words with the entries in the repository and select amongst the plurality of words, the words being semantically similar to the entries in the repository, said rule based classifier still further configured to assign a first score to only those words that match the entries of said repository, said rule based classifier further configured to aggregate the first score assigned to respective words and generate an aggregated first score; a machine-learning based classifier cooperating with said generator and said repository, said machine learning based classifier configured to receive the input text and process said input text, said machine learning based classifier further configured to generate a plurality of features corresponding to the input text based on the processing of the input text, and generate a second score corresponding to the input text, by processing the features thereof; an ensemble classifier configured to combine the aggregated first score generated by the rule based classifier and the second score generated by the machine learning based classifier, said ensemble classifier further configured to generate a classification score denoting the sentiment conveyed by the input text; and a training module cooperating with said ensemble classifier, said training module further configured to receive the input text processed by said rule based classifier and said machine-learning based classifier respectively, said training module further configured to iteratively generate training sets based on processed input text and output said training sets to the generator. 2. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein said rule based classifier further comprises a tokenizer module configured to divide each word of the input text into corresponding tokens. 3. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein said rule based classifier further comprises slang words handling module, said slang words handling module configured to identify the slang words present in the input text, said slang words handling module further configured to selectively expand identified slang words thereby rendering the slang words meaningful. 4. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein said rule based classifier is further configured to assign the first score to each of the words segregated from the input text, said rule based classifier further configured to refine the score assigned to each of said words based on the syntactical connectivity between each of said words and a plurality of negators and intensifiers. 5. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein said rule based classifier is configured not to assign a score to the words of the input text, for which no corresponding semantically similar entry are present in said repository. 6. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein said machine learning based classifier further comprises a feature extraction module configured to convert the input text into a plurality of n-grams of size selected from the group of sizes consisting of size 1, size 2 and size 3, said feature extraction module further configured to process each of the n-grams as individual features. 7. The system as claimed in claim 6, wherein said feature extraction module is further configured to process the input text and eliminate repetitive words from the input text, said feature extraction module further configured to process and remove stop words from the input text. 8. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein said ensemble classifier is further configured to compare said aggregated first score and said second score with a predetermined threshold value, said ensemble classifier further configured to generate the classification score based on the input text corresponding to the aggregated first score, in the event that the aggregated first score is greater than the predetermined threshold value, said ensemble classifier further configured to generate the classification score based on the combination of the aggregated first score and said second score, in the event that the aggregated first score is lesser than the predetermined threshold value. 9. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein said training module is configured to generate a training set based on the input text corresponding to the aggregated first score, in the event that the aggregated first score is greater than a second predetermined threshold value, said training module further configured to generate a training set based on the combination of input text corresponding to the aggregated first score and the input text corresponding to the second score, in the event that the aggregated first score is lesser than the second predetermined threshold value. 10. The system as claimed in claim 9, wherein the training module cooperates with the machine learning based classifier to selectively process the training set, said training module further configured to instruct said machine learning based classifier to selectively adapt the machine learning algorithms stored thereupon, based on the performance of said machine learning algorithms with reference to the training sets. 11. A computer implemented method for determining the sentiments conveyed by an input text, said method comprising the following steps: generating, using a generator, an initial training set comprising a plurality of words linked to respective sentiments; storing each of said words and corresponding sentiments, in a repository; receiving the input text at a rule based classifier and segregating the input text into a plurality of words; comparing, using the rule based classifier, each of said plurality of words with the entries in the repository and selecting amongst the plurality of words, the words being semantically similar to the entries in the repository; assigning a first score to only those words that match the entries of said repository, and aggregating the first score assigned to respective words and generating an aggregated first score; receiving the input text at a machine learning based classifier, and processing said input text using said machine learning based classifier and generating a plurality of features corresponding to the input text; generating, using said machine learning based classifier, a second score corresponding to the input text, based upon the features of the input text; combining the aggregated first score generated by the rule based classifier and the second score generated by the machine learning based classifier, and generating a classification score denoting the sentiment conveyed by the input text; receiving the input text processed by said rule based classifier and said machine-learning based classifier, at a training module, and iteratively generating a plurality of training sets based on processed input text; and selectively transmitting said training sets to the generator. 12. The method as claimed in claim 11, wherein the step of segregating the input text into a plurality of words further includes the following steps: dividing each word of the input text into corresponding tokens; identifying the slang words present in the input text, using a slang words handling module, and selectively expanding identified slang words thereby rendering the slang words meaningful; assigning the first score to each of the words segregated from the input text; and selectively refining the score assigned to each of said words based on the syntactical connectivity between each of said words and a plurality of negators and intensifiers; and not assigning a score to those words of the input text, for which no corresponding semantically similar entry are present in said repository. 13. The method as claimed in claim 11, wherein the step of receiving the input text at a machine learning based classifier, and processing said input text using said machine learning based classifier, further includes the following steps: converting the input text into a plurality of n-grams of size selected from the group of sizes consisting of size 1, size 2 and size 3, and processing each of the n-grams as individual features; eliminating repetitive words from the input text, and removing stop words from the input text. 14. The method as claimed in claim 11, wherein the step of generating a classification score denoting the sentiment conveyed by the input text, further includes the steps: comparing, using an ensemble classifier, said aggregated first score and said second score with a predetermined threshold value; generating the classification score based on the input text corresponding to the aggregated first score, in the event that the aggregated first score is greater than the predetermined threshold value; and generating the classification score based on the combination of the aggregated first score and said second score, in the event that the aggregated first score is lesser than the predetermined threshold value. 15. The method as claimed in claim 11, wherein the step of iteratively generating a plurality of training sets based on said input text, further includes the following steps: generating a training set based on the input text corresponding to the aggregated first score, in the event that the aggregated first score is greater than a second predetermined threshold value; generating a training set based on the combination of input text corresponding to the aggregated first score and the input text corresponding to the second score, in the event that the aggregated first score is lesser than a second predetermined threshold value; and selectively processing the training set, and instructing said machine learning based classifier to selectively adapt the machine learning algorithms stored thereupon, based on the performance of said machine learning algorithms with reference to the training sets.