According to an aspect, learning parameters in a feed forward probabilistic graphical model includes creating an inference model via a computer processor. The creation of the inference model includes receiving a training set that includes multiple scenarios, each scenario comprised of one or more natural language statements, and each scenario corresponding to a plurality of candidate answers. The creation also includes constructing evidence graphs for each of the multiple scenarios based on the training set, and calculating weights for common features across the evidence graphs that will maximize a probability of the inference model locating correct answers from corresponding candidate answers across all of the multiple scenarios. In response to an inquiry from a user that includes a scenario, the inference model constructs an evidence graph and recursively constructs formulas to express a confidence of each node in the evidence graph in terms of its parents in the evidence graph.
Please help me write a proper abstract based on the patent claims. CLAIM: 1. A method comprising: creating an inference model via a computer processor, the creating comprising: receiving a training set that includes multiple scenarios, each scenario comprised of one or more natural language statements, and each scenario corresponding to a plurality of candidate answers; constructing evidence graphs for each of the multiple scenarios based on the training set; and calculating weights for common features across the evidence graphs that will maximize a probability of the inference model locating correct answers from corresponding candidate answers across all of the multiple scenarios; in response to an inquiry from a user via the computer processor, the inquiry comprising a scenario, the inference model constructs an evidence graph and recursively constructs formulas to express a confidence of each node in the evidence graph in terms of its parents in the evidence graph. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the constructing evidence graphs includes for each scenario: extracting factors from the scenario; and generating intermediate nodes based on the extracted factors, wherein the factors are root nodes in the evidence graph and the candidate answers are terminal nodes in the evidence graph. 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the constructing evidence graphs further includes generating questions for the factors and the intermediate nodes represent the generated questions. 4. The method of claim 2, wherein edges of the intermediate nodes are determined using a question answering (QA) system that assigns a confidence value and a feature vector to each edge. 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the candidate answers are expressed as a parameterized mathematical expression that matches semantics of the inference model. 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the inference model applies different weights to the factors. 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the scenario corresponds to a medical environment and the candidate answers indicate corresponding diagnoses.