A method for measuring and scoring susceptibility to social unrest in a country or region is disclosed. Data is collected regarding socioeconomic, political, demographic or other relevant conditions within the geographic area, a set of key indicators of possible social unrest is provided, the collected data is standardized across the indicators, performance level is calculated for each of the indicators, the collected data for each indicator within the geographic area is assigned a score based on the measurement of each indicator, and an overall score for the indicators is determined.
Please help me write a proper abstract based on the patent claims. CLAIM: 1. A Method for measuring and scoring susceptibility to social unrest in a geographic area, comprising the steps of: collecting data regarding socioeconomic, political, demographic or other relevant conditions within the geographic area, providing a set of at least two key indicators of possible social unrest standardizing the collected date across the indicators, calculating a performance level for each of the indicators, measuring the collected data for each indicator within the geographic area and assigning a score based on the measurement of each indicator, and determining an overall score for the indicators, wherein the key indicators have a correlation to social unrest, and wherein the correlation can be a positive or negative correlation, and wherein the selection of the key indicators is based on empirical data. 2. A method according to claim 1, further comprising the steps of: achieving standardization of data by determining an average value for each indicator and establishing a set of at least four value ranges, wherein the four value ranges are severe, poor, average, and above average. 3. A method according to claim 1, further comprising the step of entering each piece of collected data into an appropriate indicator category after the data is standardized. 4. A method according to claim 1, further comprising the steps of: calculating the performance level for each of the indicators by placing the measured score on a pre-determined scale and comparing the performance level against the predetermined scale. 5. A method according to claim 1, providing the further steps of assigning a weight to each key indicator. 6. A method according to claim 1, wherein at least two indicator have a correlation to each other. 7. A method according to claim 1, further comprising the step of dividing the key indicators into primary and secondary indicators, wherein the primary indicators are those found to be necessarily present for countries susceptible to social unrest and secondary indicators are those found to have some impact on social unrest. 8. A method according to claim 7, wherein primary indicators are those found to have been present in 80-100% of areas that experienced significant social unrest according to the latest data collected, and secondary indicators are those found to have been present in 50-70% of areas that experienced significant social unrest. 9. A method according to claim 7, wherein the primary indicators are at least two of: the degree of oppression by the government, freshwater availability per capita, education level of the population, press freedom, proportion of youth to adult population, and rate of urban growth. 10. A method according to claim 1, wherein the geographic area is a country, and comprising the further steps of: selecting a country for analysis, calculating an instability metric or score for the country, determining the amount of susceptibility of the country to instability or overthrow. 11. A method according to claim 10, comprising the further step of analyzing at least one additional country. 12. A method according to claim 11, comprising the further step of combining the analysis of at least two countries to provide a regional analysis. 13. A method according to claim 10, comprising the further step of comparing the specific scores of a country across at least two indicators to known specific correlations between the at least two indicators based on previous data for the indicators, and either not recalculating the score or recalculating the score upward or downward. 14. A method according to claim 10, wherein the instability metric or score for the country is calculated by: comparing a weighted score for each country for the at least two indicators to either a previously-known weighted score or a threshold score for at least one other country for past unrest. 15. A method according to claim 10, comprising the further step of: placing the country in an appropriate position within a pre-determined scale of probable instability. 16. A method according to claim 10, comprising the further steps of: calculating the amount of instability of at least one additional country in the same region as the country and using the respective country scores together to obtain a stability level for the region in which the countries are located, and either comparing this regional stability to the stability of at least one other region or to the same region at a previous time. 17. A method according to claim 10, comprising the further steps of: providing at least a second country such that there is a first country and at least a second country, calculating a spillover effect score or metric for the at least two countries, comparing the assigned spillover effect score or metric to a pre-determined threshold score, wherein the threshold score is determined based on related past data concerning instability and spillover, and assigning a position on a scale regarding the potential for spillover. 18. A method according to claim 17, wherein the higher the spillover score, the more likely unrest is to spread from the first country to the at least second country. 19. A method according to claim 17, wherein the spillover effect or metric from the country to a second country is calculated using any combination of: the first country's assigned instability score or metric, the first country's geographic proximity or amount of shared border with the second country, and the amount of flow of people between the two countries. 20. A method according to claim 10, further comprising the steps of: calculating a secondary score for the sustainability of any possible unrest in the country, and determining the probability of severe unrest or overthrow of the government of the country by comparing the specific score for sustainability of unrest to specific indicator scores from data for previous instances of unrest in either the country or another country or countries, wherein the specific indicator scores have been pre-identified as correlating to sustainability.