Knowledge inference apparatus and method to determine emerging industrial trends and adapt strategic reasoning thereof are provided. In some aspects, user data, user stimulus-responses and user tracked data is received at a knowledge inference apparatus from multiple compute devices. The knowledge inference apparatus can generate compressed multidimensional profiles corresponding to multiple users and infer based on the received data, and the compressed multidimensional profiles multiple emerging trends developing in an industry. In some other aspects, the knowledge inference apparatus can further develop individualized strategic information for the multiple users to adequately respond to the inferred emerging trends.
Please help me write a proper abstract based on the patent claims. CLAIM: 1. A knowledge inference apparatus, comprising: one or more processors; a memory storing instructions which, when executed by the one or more processors cause the one or more processors to: receive, at the one or more processors, a first stimulus response of an at least one user and an at least one user attribute of the at least one user, the at least one user attribute received from a compute device operatively coupled to the apparatus; modify, based on the first stimulus response and the at least one user attribute, a compressed multidimensional data profile associated with the at least one user; generate a user performance assessment based on at least the compressed multidimensional data profile, the user performance assessment representing a first state in which the at least one user remains with respect to a targeted goal state; execute, based on the user performance assessment, an at least one production rule, the at least one production rule includes a consequent with strategic information to advance to a second state closer to the targeted goal state than the first state, the second state being after the first state; and send the strategic information to a compute device associated with the at least one user. 2. The knowledge inference apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first stimulus response includes information of an at least one of a recurrent activity performed by the at least one user, a non-recurrent activity performed by the at least one user, and a behavioral choice picked by the at least one user and from a group of alternative behavioral choices. 3. The knowledge inference apparatus of claim 1, wherein the at least one user attribute includes information captured by a tracking device associated with the at least one user. 4. The knowledge inference apparatus of claim 1, wherein the at least one user attribute includes information retrieved from a third-party server. 5. The knowledge inference apparatus of claim 1, wherein the memory storing instructions which, when executed by the one or more processors further cause the one or more processors to: send a stimulus request based on the compressed multidimensional data profile and the user performance assessment. 6. The knowledge inference apparatus of claim 5, wherein the stimulus request is an interactive digital media content. 7. The knowledge inference apparatus of claim 6, wherein the memory storing instructions which, when executed by the one or more processors further cause the one or more processors to: receive a second stimulus response, via the interactive digital media content and update the at least one production rule based on the second stimulus response. 8. The knowledge inference apparatus of claim 7, wherein the second stimulus response includes a strategic decision made by the at least one user. 9. The knowledge inference apparatus of claim 7, wherein the strategic decision included in the second stimulus response is forwarded to a group of users. 10. The knowledge inference apparatus of claim 6, wherein the interactive digital media content includes a search engine to browse through individual strategic decisions and collective strategic decisions, the individual strategic decisions and the collective strategic decisions associated with the at least one user. 11. The knowledge inference apparatus of claim 5, wherein the stimulus request includes a digital representation with a set of indicators associated with a plurality individual priorities of the at least one user. 12. The knowledge inference apparatus of claim 7, wherein the digital representation further includes a tracked time for each of the individual priorities in the plurality of individual priorities, the tracked time associated with the time the at least one user spent on each of the individual priorities during a period of time. 13. The knowledge inference apparatus of claim 10, wherein: for each individual priority from the plurality of individual priorities, the digital representation further includes a first calendar with a scheduled time for that individual priority, that scheduled time is associated with a targeted time for the at least one user to spend on that individual priority. 14. The knowledge inference apparatus of claim 13, wherein the first calendar is synchronized with a shared calendar associated with a group of users. 15. The knowledge inference apparatus of claim 1, wherein the memory storing instructions which, when executed by the one or more processors further cause the one or more processors to: modify the targeted goal state based on at least one of the stimulus response, the at least one user attribute, or the performance assessment, and not based on a survey provided to the at least one user. 16. The knowledge inference apparatus of claim 1, wherein the at least one production rule is a user behavioral strategy production rule. 17. The knowledge inference apparatus of claim 1, wherein the at least one user attribute is associated with an event scheduled by the at least one user. 18. The knowledge inference apparatus of claim 1, wherein the strategic information includes at least one alternative action to overcome a scheduled event conflict. 19. The knowledge inference apparatus of claim 1, wherein the strategic information includes at least one alternative action to overcome a scheduled event conflict. 20. The knowledge inference apparatus of claim 1, wherein the at least one production rule is an individualized production rule uniquely associated with a first user from a plurality of users of the knowledge inference apparatus. 21. The knowledge inference apparatus of claim 1, wherein the memory storing instructions which, when executed by the one or more processors further cause the one or more processors to: execute, based on the user performance assessment, an at least one engagement production rule, the at least one engagement production rule includes a consequent with a stimulus request to collect user data; and send the stimulus request to a compute device associated with the at least one user. 22. A computer-implemented method, comprising: receiving, at a processor of a knowledge inference apparatus, a first set of data including data representative of activities performed by an at least one user during a first time interval; determining, based on the first set of data, a first state in which the at least one user remains with respect to a targeted goal state; executing, based on the first state, an production rule included in a knowledge base, the production rule having a consequent with strategic information for the at least one user to advance to a predicted second state closer to the targeted goal state than the first state, the predicted second state being after the first state; receiving, a second set of data including data representative of activities performed by the at least one user during a second time interval; determining, based on the second set of data a second state in which the at least one user remains with respect to the targeted goal state, the second state being after the first state; and modifying the production rule when the second state is different to the predicted second state. 23. The computer-implemented method of claim 22, further comprising: increasing a confidence value associated with the production rule when the second state is equal to the predicted second state. 24. The computer-implemented method of claim 22, wherein modifying the production rule further includes: decreasing a confidence value associated with the production rule. 25. The computer-implemented method of claim 22, wherein modifying the production rule further includes: changing an antecedent of the production rule. 26. The computer-implemented method of claim 22, wherein modifying the production rule further includes: changing a consequent of the production rule. 27. The computer-implemented method of claim 22, further comprising: executing, based on the first set of data, an at least one multidimensional data profile rule, the at least one multidimensional data profile rule having a consequent with new inferences about the at least one user; modifying a compressed multidimensional data profile associated with the at least one user based on the consequent to produce a modified multidimensional data profile; and sending a stimulus request based on at least the modified multidimensional data profile. 28. The computer-implemented method of claim 22, wherein the first set of data further includes a stimulus-response of the at least one user. 29. The computer-implemented method of claim 22, wherein the first set of data further includes information captured by a tracking device associated with the at least one user. 30. The computer-implemented method of claim 22, wherein the first set of data further includes information retrieved from a third-party server. 31. A computer-implemented method comprising: receiving, at a processor of a knowledge inference apparatus, a first data set including data representative of activities performed by a first user during a first time interval; receiving, at the processor, a second data set including data representative of activities performed by a second user during the first time interval; compiling, based on the first data set, a first compressed multidimensional data profile associated with the first user; compiling, based on the second data set, a second compressed multidimensional data profile associated with the second user; determining a data pattern based on an at least one range of values of an at least one inclination distribution in the first compressed multidimensional data profile; determining the data pattern based on an at least one range of values of the at least one inclination distribution in the second compressed multidimensional data profile; executing, based on the data pattern, one or more production rules to produce strategic information to reach a targeted goal state; and sending the strategic information to one or more compute devices associated with the first user, the second user and a third user. 32. The computer-implemented method of claim 31, further comprising: retrieving, from local memory, a third compressed multidimensional data profile, the third multidimensional data profile associated with the third user; and determining the data pattern based on an at least one range of values of the at least one inclination distribution in the third compressed multidimensional data profile. 33. The computer-implemented method of claim 31 wherein the first data set includes at least one of a stimulus-response of the first user or an at least one user attribute of the first user, the at least one user attribute of the second user received from a compute device operatively coupled to the processor. 34. The computer-implemented method of claim 31 wherein the second data set includes at least one of a stimulus-response of the second user or an at least one user attribute of the second user, the at least one user attribute of the second user received from a compute device operatively coupled to the processor. 35. The computer-implemented method of claim 31 further comprising: adding a new production rule to a knowledge base prescribing strategic information associated with the data pattern.