Systems and methods are provided for curating and disseminating a network model. A representation of a network model is provided, and data is received that is representative of user actions. The user actions are directed to at least one element of the network model. A score is assigned to each respective element based on a number of user actions received for the respective element. A verified subset of edges is identified that have assigned scores that exceed a verification threshold, and a rejected subset of edges is identified that have assigned scores that are below a rejection threshold. The verified subset of edges and the associated nodes are provided as a curated network model, which omits the rejected subset of edges.
Please help me write a proper abstract based on the patent claims. CLAIM: 1. A computerized method for curating a network model, the method comprising: providing, by a computer system including a communications port and at least one computer processor in communication with at least one non-transitory computer readable medium storing at least one electronic database comprising data representative of an initial network model and elements of the initial network model, the initial network model including a plurality of nodes interconnected with a plurality of edges, each edge being representative of a causal relationship between two connected nodes; requesting user actions from a plurality of users, the user actions being directed to an element of the network model, wherein the element comprises an edge, a node or an item of information associated with an edge or a node; assigning an approval score and a rejection score to each element of the network model based on the user actions received for the respective element; identifying a first set of elements that each have an approval score that exceeds a verification threshold; identifying a second set of elements that each have a rejection score that exceeds a rejection threshold; identifying a third set of elements that each have an approval score that is below the verification threshold and a rejection score that is below the rejection threshold; generating a curated network model that comprises the first set of elements, omits the second set of elements, and omits the third set of elements; and providing via the communications port data representative of the curated network model. 2. (canceled) 3. (canceled) 4. The computerized method of claim 1, wherein at least one user action includes a suggestion for a new element previously absent from the network model, the method further comprising: requesting user actions directed to the new element, and modifying the initial network model or the curated network model by including the new element after the new element is verified by determining that an approval score of the new element exceeds the verification threshold. 5. (canceled) 6. The computerized method of claim 1, wherein at least some of the user actions are binary votes provided by the users that indicate whether the user approves or disapproves an element of the network model. 7. The computerized method of claim 1, wherein the score assigned to a respective element is a function of the number of received user actions directed to the respective element, a characteristic of each of the received user actions, or both, and wherein the characteristic of each of the received user action includes an indication of whether the respective user action is of a positive nature or of a negative nature. 8. (canceled) 9. (canceled) 10. (canceled) 11. The computerized method of claim 1, wherein the network model represents a biological system, each node represents a biological entity that interacts with at least one of the other nodes, and each edge represents a causal relationship between the biological entities. 12. The computerized method of claim 11, wherein the data that represents the network model is provided using Biological Expression Language. 13. The computerized method of claim 1, further comprising managing incentives awarded to individual users according to the user actions of each respective user by an integrated reputation system. 14. The computerized method of claim 13, wherein the integrated reputation system awards a number of points to a user according to the user action, wherein the number of points awarded is modified according to the status of the network model, said status being determined by one or more factors comprising the number of user actions received for the element, the nature of the user actions received for the element, or the location of the node or edge relative to the other nodes and edges in the network model. 15. The computerized method of claim 14, wherein the integrated reputation system awards additional points to a user based on a user action directed to the verification of an element, prior to the element being verified by subsequent user actions, and wherein a number of points assigned to a user who provided the new element is larger than a number of points assigned to a user who provided a modification of an existing element in the network model. 16. (canceled) 17. The computerized method of claim 1, wherein the network model is a biological network model that represents a biological system, the biological network model being a subset of a macro network model and being defined by selecting a boundary of the macro network model. 18. (canceled) 19. (canceled) 20. (canceled) 21. (canceled) 22. (canceled) 23. The computerized method of claim 1, further comprising requesting additional user actions from the plurality of users, the additional user actions being directed to specifically the third set of elements. 24. The computerized method of claim 14, wherein the number of points awarded to the user for a voting user action is less than the number of points awarded to the user for a user action that provides a new element. 25. The computerized method of claim 14, wherein: a first element is associated with at least a threshold number of user actions; a second element is associated with less than the threshold number of user actions; and the number of points awarded to the user for a user action associated with the first element is less than the number of points awarded to the user for a user action associated with the second element. 26. The computerized method of claim 14, wherein the number of points awarded to the user for a user action associated with an element in the third set of elements is larger than the number of points awarded to the user for a user action associated with an element in the first set of elements or in the second set of elements. 27. The computerized method of claim 1, further comprising determining that user actions received from a subset of users within the plurality of users are correlated, and rejecting the user actions received from the subset of users. 28. A system for curating a network model, the system comprising: at least one electronic database comprising data representative of an initial network model and elements of the initial network model, the initial network model including a plurality of nodes interconnected with a plurality of edges, each edge being representative of a causal relationship between two connected nodes; a communications port configured to (1) transmit requests for user actions from a plurality of users, the user actions being directed to an element of the network model, wherein the element comprises an edge, a node or an item of information associated with an edge or a node, and (2) provide data representative of a curated network model; at least one computer processor configured to: request user actions from a plurality of users, the user actions being directed to an element of the network model, wherein the element comprises an edge, a node or an item of information associated with an edge or a node; assign an approval score and a rejection score to each element of the network model based on the user actions received for the respective element; identify a first set of elements that each have an approval score that exceeds a verification threshold; identify a second set of elements that each have a rejection score that exceeds a rejection threshold; identify a third set of elements that each have an approval score that is below the verification threshold and a rejection score that is below the rejection threshold; and generate the curated network model that comprises the first set of elements, omits the second set of elements, and omits the third set of elements. 29. The system of claim 28, wherein at least one user action includes a suggestion for a new element previously absent from the network model, and the at least one computer processor is further configured to: request user actions directed to the new element, and modify the initial network model or the curated network model by including the new element after the new element is verified by determining that an approval score of the new element exceeds the verification threshold. 30. The system of claim 28, wherein: the at least one computer processor is further configured to manage incentives awarded to individual users according to the user actions of each respective user by an integrated reputation system; the integrated reputation system awards a number of points to a user according to the user action; the number of points awarded is modified according to the status of the network model, said status being determined by one or more factors comprising the number of user actions received for the element, the nature of the user actions received for the element, or the location of the node or edge relative to the other nodes and edges in the network model; the integrated reputation system awards additional points to a user based on a user action directed to the verification of an element, prior to the element being verified by subsequent user actions; and a number of points assigned to a user who provided the new element is larger than a number of points assigned to a user who provided a modification of an existing element in the network model. 31. The system of claim 30, wherein: the number of points awarded to the user for a voting user action is less than the number of points awarded to the user for a user action that provides a new element; a first element is associated with at least a threshold number of user actions; a second element is associated with less than the threshold number of user actions; and the number of points awarded to the user for a user action associated with the first element is less than the number of points awarded to the user for a user action associated with the second element; and the number of points awarded to the user for a user action associated with an element in the third set of elements is larger than the number of points awarded to the user for a user action associated with an element in the first set of elements or in the second set of elements. 31. The system of claim 28, wherein the at least one computer processor is further configured to request additional user actions from the plurality of users, the additional user actions being directed to specifically the third set of elements. 32. The system of claim 28, wherein the at least one computer processor is further configured to determine that user actions received from a subset of users within the plurality of users are correlated, and rejecting the user actions received from the subset of users.