There is disclosed a computer implemented method for training a search ranker, the search ranker being configured to ranking search results. The method comprises: retrieving, by the server, a training dataset including a plurality of training objects; for each training object, based on the corresponding associated object feature vector: determining a weight parameter, the weight parameter being indicative of a quality of the label; determining a relevance parameter, the relevance parameter being indicative of a moderated value of the labels relative to other labels within the training dataset; training the search ranker using the plurality of training objects of the training dataset, the determined relevance parameter for each training object of the plurality of training objects of the training dataset, and the determined weight parameter for each object of the plurality of training objects of the training dataset to rank a new document.
Please help me write a proper abstract based on the patent claims. CLAIM: 1. A computer implemented method for training a search ranker, the search ranker being configured to ranking search results, the method being executable at a server associated with the search ranker, the method comprising: retrieving, by the server, a training dataset including a plurality of training objects, each training object within the training dataset having been assigned a label and being associated with an object feature vector; for each training object, based on the corresponding associated object feature vector: determining a weight parameter, the weight parameter being indicative of a quality of the label; determining a relevance parameter, the relevance parameter being indicative of a moderated value of the labels relative to other labels within the training dataset; training the search ranker using the plurality of training objects of the training dataset, the determined relevance parameter for each training object of the plurality of training objects of the training dataset, and the determined weight parameter for each object of the plurality of training objects of the training dataset to rank a new document. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the training dataset is a crowd-sourced training dataset. 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the training dataset is a crowd-sourced training dataset and wherein each training object within the training dataset has been assigned the label by a crowd-sourcing participant. 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the object feature vector is based, at least in part, on data associated with the crowd-sourcing participant assigning the label to a given training object. 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the data is representative of at least one of: browsing activities of the crowd-sourcing participant, time interval spent reviewing the given training object, experience level associated with the crowd-sourcing participant, a rigor parameter associated with the crowd-sourcing participant. 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the object feature vector is based, at least in part, on data associated with ranking features of a given training object. 7. The method of claim 1, the method further comprising learning a relevance parameter function for determining the relevance parameter for each training object using the corresponding associated object feature vector by optimizing a ranking quality of the search ranker. 8. The method of claim 1, the method further comprising learning a weight function for determining the weight label for each training object based on the corresponding associated object feature vector by optimizing a ranking quality of the search ranker. 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the relevance parameter is determined by a relevance parameter function; the weight label is determined by a weight function; the relevance parameter function and the weight function having been independently trained. 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the search ranker is configured to execute a machine learning algorithm and wherein training the search ranker comprises training the machine learning algorithm. 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the machine learning algorithm is based on one of a supervised training and a semi-supervised training. 12. The method of claim 10, wherein the machine learning algorithm is one of a neural network, a decision tree-based algorithm, association rule learning based MLA, a Deep Learning based MLA, an inductive logic programming based MLA, a support vector machines based MLA, a clustering based MLA, a Bayesian network, a reinforcement learning based MLA, a representation learning based MLA, a similarity and metric learning based MLA, a sparse dictionary learning based MLA, and a genetic algorithms based MLA. 13. The method of claim 1, wherein the training is based on a target of directly optimizing quality of the search ranker. 14. The method of claim 1, further comprising calculating the object feature vector based on a plurality of object features. 15. The method of claim 14, the plurality of object features including at least ranking features and label features, and wherein the method further comprises organizing object features in a matrix with matrix rows representing ranking features and matrix columns representing label features. 16. The method of claim 15, wherein the calculating the object feature vector comprises calculating an objective feature based on the matrix. 17. A training server for training a search ranker, the search ranker server for ranking search results, the training server comprising: a network interface for communicatively coupling to a communication network; a processor coupled to the network interface, the processor configured to: retrieve a training dataset including a plurality of training objects, each training object within the training dataset having been assigned a label and being associated with an object feature vector; for each training object, based on the corresponding associated object feature vector: determine a weight parameter, the weight parameter being indicative of a quality of the label; determine a relevance parameter, the relevance parameter being indicative of a moderated value of the labels relative to other labels within the training dataset; train the search ranker using the plurality of training objects of the training dataset, the determined relevance parameter for each training object of the plurality of training objects of the training dataset, and the determined weight parameter for each object of the plurality of training objects of the training dataset to rank a new document.