Systems and methods are provided for a computer-implemented method for identifying pairs of cohesive words within a text. A supervised model is trained to detect cohesive words within a text to be scored. Training the supervised model includes identifying a plurality of pairs of candidate cohesive words in a training essay and an order associated with the pairs of candidate cohesive words based on an order of words in the training essay. The pairs of candidate cohesive words are filtered to form a set of evaluation pairs. The evaluation pairs are provided via a graphical user interface based on the order associated with the pairs of candidate cohesive words. An indication of cohesion or no cohesion is received for the evaluation pairs via the graphical user interface. The supervised model is trained based on the evaluation pairs and the received indications.
Please help me write a proper abstract based on the patent claims. CLAIM: 1. A computer-implemented method for identifying pairs of cohesive words within a text, comprising: training a supervised model to detect cohesive words within a text to be scored, wherein training the supervised model comprises: identifying a plurality of pairs of candidate cohesive words in a training essay and an order associated with the pairs of candidate cohesive words based on an order of words in the training essay; filtering the pairs of candidate cohesive words to form a set of evaluation pairs; providing the evaluation pairs via a graphical user interface based on the order associated with the pairs of candidate cohesive words; receiving an indication of cohesion or no cohesion for the evaluation pairs via the graphical user interface; training the supervised model based on the evaluation pairs and the received indications; providing an essay to be scored to the trained supervised model, wherein the trained supervised model identifies pairs of cohesive words within the essay to be scored. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein providing the evaluation pairs comprises: displaying a portion of the training essay; indicating a focal word from the evaluation pairs in the training essay; highlighting one of a plurality of candidate associate words of the evaluation pairs that appears in the training essay before the focal word, wherein fewer than all words appearing in the training essay are candidate associate words based on the filtering; receiving and storing an indication of sufficient relatedness between the focal word and the highlighted candidate associate word from an annotator; highlighting additional candidate associate words and receiving and storing indications for those additional candidate associate words until all candidate associate words of the focal word have been considered by the annotator; indicating a next focal word in the training essay. 3. The method of claim 1, wherein filtering the pairs of candidate cohesive words evaluation pairs from all possible pairs of words in the training essay using filters based on one or more of: part of speech or words in a word pair; distance between words in a word pair; frequency of appearance of words in a word pair; multiple appearances of words in a word pair; words that typically appear in a predetermined type of essay associated with the training essay. 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising providing a score for the essay to be scored based on a number of pairs of cohesive words identified in the essay to be scored. 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the essay to be scored is provided a score that indicates a quality of the essay or a difficulty of the essay based on the number of pairs of cohesive words identified. 6. The method of claim 1, wherein training the supervised model comprises identifying one or more features associated with a particular evaluation pair that has received an indication of cohesion via the graphical user interface, wherein the one or more features include one or more of: a pointwise mutual information feature; a distributional similarity feature; a semantic relatedness feature determined based on a hierarchical word corpus; a free association feature; a distance feature; and a repetition feature. 7. The method of claim 6, wherein certain features of the particular evaluation pair are accessed from a word pair feature repository. 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the supervised model is trained utilizing a regressions process that utilizes one or more regressors of: gradient boosting, ridge, support vector, and random forest. 9. The method of claim 1, wherein identifying pairs of cohesive words within the essay to be scored comprises: identifying candidate pairs in the essay to be scored; determining features of each candidate pair in the essay to be scored; determining a score for each candidate pair based on the determined features; incrementing a word pair measure for the essay to be scored when the score for a candidate pair exceeds a threshold. 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the word pair measure is a mean cohesion measure of the essay to be scored. 11. A computer-implemented system for identifying pairs of cohesive words within a text, comprising: a processing system comprising one or more data processors and a non-transitory computer-readable medium encoded with instructions for commanding the one or more data processors to execute steps comprising: training a supervised model to detect cohesive words within a text to be scored, wherein training the supervised model comprises: identifying a plurality of pairs of candidate cohesive words in a training essay and an order associated with the pairs of candidate cohesive words based on an order of words in the training essay; filtering the pairs of candidate cohesive words to form a set of evaluation pairs; providing the evaluation pairs via a graphical user interface based on the order associated with the pairs of candidate cohesive words; receiving an indication of cohesion or no cohesion for the evaluation pairs via the graphical user interface; training the supervised model based on the evaluation pairs and the received indications; providing an essay to be scored to the trained supervised model, wherein the trained supervised model identifies pairs of cohesive words within the essay to be scored. 12. The system of claim 11, wherein providing the evaluation pairs comprises: displaying a portion of the training essay; indicating a focal word from the evaluation pairs in the training essay; highlighting one of a plurality of candidate associate words of the evaluation pairs that appears in the training essay before the focal word, wherein fewer than all words appearing in the training essay are candidate associate words based on the filtering; receiving and storing an indication of sufficient relatedness between the focal word and the highlighted candidate associate word from an annotator; highlighting additional candidate associate words and receiving and storing indications for those additional candidate associate words until all candidate associate words of the focal word have been considered by the annotator; indicating a next focal word in the training essay. 13. The system of claim 11, wherein filtering the pairs of candidate cohesive words evaluation pairs from all possible pairs of words in the training essay using filters based on one or more of: part of speech or words in a word pair; distance between words in a word pair; frequency of appearance of words in a word pair; multiple appearances of words in a word pair; words that typically appear in a predetermined type of essay associated with the training essay. 14. The system of claim 11, wherein the steps further comprise providing a score for the essay to be scored based on a number of pairs of cohesive words identified in the essay to be scored. 15. The system of claim 14, wherein the essay to be scored is provided a score that indicates a quality of the essay or a difficulty of the essay based on the number of pairs of cohesive words identified. 16. The system of claim 11, wherein training the supervised model comprises identifying one or more features associated with a particular evaluation pair that has received an indication of cohesion via the graphical user interface, wherein the one or more features include one or more of: a pointwise mutual information feature; a distributional similarity feature; a semantic relatedness feature determined based on a hierarchical word corpus; a free association feature; a distance feature; and a repetition feature. 17. The system of claim 16, wherein certain features of the particular evaluation pair are accessed from a word pair feature repository. 18. The system of claim 11, wherein the supervised model is trained utilizing a regressions process that utilizes one or more regressors of: gradient boosting, ridge, support vector, and random forest. 19. The system of claim 11, wherein identifying pairs of cohesive words within the essay to be scored comprises: identifying candidate pairs in the essay to be scored; determining features of each candidate pair in the essay to be scored; determining a score for each candidate pair based on the determined features; incrementing a word pair measure for the essay to be scored when the score for a candidate pair exceeds a threshold. 20. A non-transitory computer-readable medium encoded with instructions for commanding a processing system comprising one or more data processors to execute steps of a method for identifying pairs of cohesive words within a text, the method comprising: training a supervised model to detect cohesive words within a text to be scored, wherein training the supervised model comprises: identifying a plurality of pairs of candidate cohesive words in a training essay and an order associated with the pairs of candidate cohesive words based on an order of words in the training essay; filtering the pairs of candidate cohesive words to form a set of evaluation pairs; providing the evaluation pairs via a graphical user interface based on the order associated with the pairs of candidate cohesive words; receiving an indication of cohesion or no cohesion for the evaluation pairs via the graphical user interface; training the supervised model based on the evaluation pairs and the received indications; providing an essay to be scored to the trained supervised model, wherein the trained supervised model identifies pairs of cohesive words within the essay to be scored.