This present disclosure describes a novel computational method for assessing fee creativity of human-generated and machine-generated creative products, such as paintings, sculptures, poetry, music, etc. The proposed computational method and algorithm is based on constructing a network between creative products and using this network to infer the originality arid influence of its nodes.
Please help me write a proper abstract based on the patent claims. CLAIM: 1. A non-transitory computer readable memory configured to store one or more programs for execution by a processor, wherein the one or more programs has machine readable instructions that when executed by the processor cause the following steps to be performed: inputting a first data set, via the processor, the first data set comprising a plurality of works fixed in a tangible medium; calculating, via the processor, a creativity score for each of the plurality of works, wherein calculations are performed in accordance with a creativity algorithm. wherein the creativity algorithm comprises an originality component and an influence component; and creating a second data set, via the processor, comprising the creativity score applied to each of the components of the first data set. 2. The non-transitory computer readable memory as recited in claim 1, wherein the first data set comprises a plurality of paintings. 3. The non-transitory computer readable memory as recited in claim 2, wherein the first data set includes content associated with each of the plurality of paintings, and wherein the content is selected from the group consisting of space; texture; form; shape; color; tone; and line. 4. The non-transitory computer readable memory as recited in claim 1, wherein the first data set comprises a plurality of music recordings. 5. The non-transitory computer readable memory as recited in claim 4, wherein the first data set includes content associated with each of the plurality of music recordings, and wherein the content is selected from the group consisting of: tones; rhythm; melody; dynamic; harmony form; and texture. 6. The non-transitory computer readable memory as recited in claim 1, wherein the machine readable instructions, when executed by the processor, further cause the following steps to be performed: displaying, using a graphical user interface, one or more creativity scores in the second data set. 7. The non-transitory computer readable memory as recited in claim 6, wherein the displaying farther includes organizing the one or more creativity scores in the second data set as a graphical representation. 8. The non-transitory computer readable memory as recited in claim 7, wherein the graphical representation organizes the one or more creativity scores in the second data set according to date of production of the work and according to creativity score. 9. A method for assessing creativity of one or more artistic works, the method comprising: inputting a first data set, via a processor, the first data set comprising a plurality of works fixed in a tangible medium; calculating, via the processor, a creativity score for each of the plurality of works, wherein calculations are performed in accordance with a creativity algorithm, wherein the creativity algorithm comprises an originality component and an influence component; and creating a second data set, via the processor, comprising the creativity score applied to each of the components of the first data set. 10. The method as recited in claim 9, further comprising assigning one or more parameters, wherein each parameter includes a different means of assigning the creativity score to each of the components of the first data set. 11. The method as recited in claim 10, wherein the parameters are input by a user using a graphical user interface. 12. The method as recited in claim 9, further comprising digitizing one or more of the plurality of works using a camera coupled to an electronic device. 13. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein the calculating includes determined the originality component and the influence component individually 14. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein the first data set comprises a plurality of artistic works selected from the group consisting of: paintings; music recordings; photographs; graphical designs; and motion pictures. 15. The method as recited in claim 14, wherein the first data set includes content associated with each of the plurality of artistic works 16. The method as recited in claim 15, wherein the content is selected from the group consisting of: space; texture; form; shape; color; tone; line; tones; rhythm; melody; dynamic; harmony form; and texture. 17. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein the calculating the creativity score further includes calculating a creativity score for a particular artist. 18. The method as recited in claim 9, further comprising: displaying, using a graphical user interface, one or more creativity scores in the second data set. 19. The method as recited in claim 18, wherein the displaying further includes organizing the one or more creativity scores in the second data set as a graphical representation. 20. The method as recited in claim 19, wherein the graphical representation organizes the one or more creativity scores in the second data set according to date of production of the work and according to creativity score.