A system and method assesses and manages risk of an operation of a user. A rules engine of computer executable instructions stored in the storage device determines at least one of a safety risk measurement based on key performance indicators, an operational safety risk measurement for the operation as a function of the operational safety risk measurement information stored in a storage device and/or a conditional safety risk measurement for the operation as a function of the conditional safety risk measurement information stored in the storage device. A processor connected to the storage device executes the rules engine. An output interface connected to the processor indicates the determined safety risk for the operation.
Please help me write a proper abstract based on the patent claims. CLAIM: 1. A system for assessing risk of an operation of a user comprising: a storage device; an operational safety risk input interface for receiving operational safety risk information from the user or from other systems of the operation, said operational safety risk information stored in the storage device and indicative of an operational safety risk measurement of the operation; a conditional safety risk input interface for receiving conditional safety risk information from the user or from other systems of the operation, said conditional safety risk information stored in the storage device and indicative of a conditional safety risk measurement of the operation; a rules engine of computer executable instructions stored in the storage device, said rules engine for determining at least one of an operational safety risk measurement for the operation as a function of the operational safety risk measurement information stored in the storage device and a conditional safety risk measurement for the operation as a function of the conditional safety risk measurement information stored in the storage device; a processor connected to the storage device and executing the rules engine instructions for determining a safety risk analysis measurement based on at least one of the determined operational safety risk measurement for the operation and the determined conditional safety risk measurement for the operation; a safety risk analysis measurement output interface connected to the processor and indicating the determined safety risk analysis measurement for the operation; and a safety risk variables input module for indicating a status of variables that impact safety risk, said variables including at least one of life of equipment, maintenance level of equipment and inspection rigor. 2. The system of claim 1 further comprising a conditional safety risk work flow monitor input for monitoring a potential safety condition, identifying when the monitored condition is outside a given range and initiating at least one of a corrective action, a notice to an operator of the situation and an indication to an operator action to be taken. 3. The system of claim 1 further comprising: a notification module of computer executable instructions executed by the processor to notify an operator of a situation, a condition or safety risk analysis measurement for the operation; and an action rules engine of computer executable instructions stored in the storage device, said action rules engine for selectively activating the notification module in response to the determined safety risk analysis measurement for the operation. 4. The system of claim 3 wherein the notification module provides at least one of a text, an email, or other electronic message to an operator as a notification. 5. The system of claim 1 further comprising: a workflow trigger/corrective action module of computer executable instructions executed by the processor for triggering workflows in response to the safety risk analysis measurement to notify and guide a compliance process or to keep an operator informed via the safety risk analysis measurement output interface whereby the operator is aware when processes are correctly followed or when there may be a safety issue; and an action rules engine of computer executable instructions stored in the storage device, said action rules engine for selectively activating the action module in response to the determined safety risk analysis measurement for the operation. 6. The system of claim 5 wherein the workflow is triggered when a safety risk analysis measurement is outside a preset range. 7. The system of claim 1 wherein the safety risk analysis measurement is a weighted composite which is a function of the operational safety risk measurement information stored in the storage device or as a function of the conditional safety risk measurement information stored in the storage device. 8. The system of claim 1 wherein the processor determines the safety risk analysis measurement for the operation according to the following: SR=w1*OSR+w2*CSR wherein SR is the safety risk analysis measurement, w1 and w2 are weighting factors, OSR is an operational safety risk determined by the processor based on the received operational safety risk information and CSR is a conditional safety risk determined by the processor based on the received conditional safety risk information. 9. The system of claim 1 wherein the processor determines the safety risk analysis measurement for the operation according to the following: SR=OSR+CSR wherein SR is the safety risk analysis measurement, OSR is an operational safety risk determined by the processor based on the received operational safety risk information and CSR is a conditional safety risk determined by the processor based on the received conditional safety risk information. 10. The system of claim 1 wherein the processor determines the safety risk analysis measurement for the operation according to the following: SR=MAX{OSR,CSR} wherein SR is the safety risk analysis measurement, OSR is an operational safety risk determined by the processor based on the received operational safety risk information, and CSR is a conditional safety risk determined by the processor based on the received conditional safety risk information whereby the SR is the maximum of the OSR or the CSR. 11. The system of claim 1 wherein the processor determines the safety risk analysis measurement for the operation according to the following: SR=MAX{w1*OSR,w2*CSR} wherein SR is the safety risk analysis measurement, w1 and w2 are weighting factors, OSR is an operational safety risk determined by the processor based on the received operational safety risk information and CSR is a conditional safety risk determined by the processor based on the received conditional safety risk information whereby the SR is the maximum of the w1*OSR or the w2*CSR. 12. A computerized method for assessing risk of an operation of a user comprising executing computer executable instructions stored in a memory, said instructions: receiving operational safety risk information from the user or from other systems of the operation, said operational safety risk information stored in the storage device and indicative of an operational safety risk measurement of the operation; receiving conditional safety risk information from the user or from other systems of the operation, said conditional safety risk information stored in the storage device and indicative of a conditional safety risk measurement of the operation; determining at least one of an operational safety risk measurement for the operation as a function of the operational safety risk measurement information stored in the storage device and a conditional safety risk measurement for the operation as a function of the conditional safety risk measurement information stored in the storage device; determining a safety risk analysis measurement based on the determined operational safety risk measurement for the operation and based on the determined conditional safety risk measurement for the operation; indicating the determined safety risk analysis measurement for the operation; and indicating a status of variables that impact safety risk, said variables including at least one of life of equipment, maintenance level of equipment and inspection rigor. 13. The method of claim 12 further comprising: notifying an operator of a situation, a condition or safety risk analysis measurement for the operation; and selectively activating the notifying in response to the determined safety risk analysis measurement for the operation. 14. The method of claim 13 wherein the notifying comprises at least one of providing a text, an email, or other electronic message to an operation as a notification. 15. The method of claim 12 further comprising: triggering workflows in response to the safety risk analysis measurement to notify and guide a compliance process or to keep an operator informed via the safety risk analysis measurement output interface whereby the operator is aware when processes are correctly followed or when there may be a safety issue; and selectively activating the triggering in response to the determined safety risk analysis measurement for the operation. 16. The method of claim 15 wherein a workflow is triggered when a safety risk analysis measurement is outside a preset range. 17. The method of claim 12 wherein the safety risk analysis measurement is a weighted composite which is a function of the operational safety risk measurement information stored in the storage device or as a function of the conditional safety risk measurement information stored in the storage device. 18. A system for assessing risk of an operation of a user comprising: a storage device; an input interface for defining key performance indicators (KPIs) from the user, said KPIs stored in the storage device and indicative of a risk measurement of the operation; an interface for monitoring the defined KPIs and for receiving KPI information corresponding to the monitored KPIs; a rules engine of computer executable instructions stored in the storage device, said rules engine for defining a safety performance indicator (SPI) based on the received KPI information; a processor connected to the storage device and executing the rules engine instructions for determining the SPI; an SPI output interface connected to the processor and indicating the determined SPI for the operation; and wherein at least one of the following: equipment of the operation has a number of layers of protection, wherein each layer of protection has associated with it a risk reduction factor and wherein key performance indicators (KPIs) are associated with each equipment and are aggregated and weighted using the risk reduction factor associated with a layer of protection (LOP) of each equipment; and the operation has a number of lines of equipment, wherein each line of equipment has associated with it a total equipment risk and wherein safety performance indicators (SPIs) are associated with each of the lines of equipment and are aggregated using a total risk factor calculated from a layer of protection (LOP) analysis of each line of equipment. 19. The system of claim 18 wherein the KPI for a layer of protection is calculated as follows: KPI_LOP j =  ∑ i K j   ( w i * KPI i )  ∑ i K   ( w i ) Where KPI_LOP=weighted average KPI of a layer of protection; w=weight of a KPI; KPI=key performance indicator related to plant, process, people as applicable; K=number of KPIs for a LOP; i=index counts number of KPIs; j=index counts number of LOPs; 20. The system of claim 19 wherein the equipment of the operation has a number of layers of protection, wherein each layer of protection has associated with it a risk reduction factor and wherein key performance indicators (KPIs) are associated with each equipment and are aggregated and weighted using the risk reduction factor associated with a layer of protection (LOP) of each equipment. 21. The system of claim 19 wherein the operation has a number of lines of equipment, wherein each line of equipment has associated with it a total equipment risk and wherein safety performance indicators (SPIs) are associated with each of the lines of equipment and are aggregated using a total risk factor calculated from a layer of protection (LOP) analysis of each line of equipment.