Aspects of the present disclosure relate to a machine determining a quality ranking of a subject. The machine accesses a current input representing answers to a plurality of questions about the subject, each answer representing a ranking of a quality of the subject at a specified time, where the subject has a geographic location. The machine determines, based on the current input, an overall ranking of the quality of the subject. The machine determines, based on the current input and based on one or more of input received about the subject at a time different from the specified time and input about other subjects proximate to the geographic location, a future ranking of the quality of the subject. The machine transmits a graphical output corresponding to the overall ranking and the determined future ranking of the quality of the subject.
Please help me write a proper abstract based on the patent claims. CLAIM: 1. A system comprising: one or more processors; and a memory comprising instructions which, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to at least: access a current input representing answers to a plurality of questions about a subject, each answer representing a ranking of a quality of the subject at a specified time, wherein the subject has a geographic location; determine, based on the current input, an overall ranking of the quality of the subject; determine, based on the current input and based on input received about the subject at a time different from the specified time and input about other subjects proximate to the geographic location, a future ranking of the quality of the subject; and electronically transmit, to a computing device for display at the computing device, a graphical output corresponding to the overall ranking and the future ranking of the quality of the subject. 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are further to: determine that the future ranking of the quality of the subject is within an unacceptable range; and provide an alert that the future ranking of the quality of the subject is within the unacceptable range. 3. The system of claim 2, wherein the instructions to provide the alert that the future ranking of the quality of the subject is within the unacceptable range comprise instructions to: transmit for display, within the graphical output corresponding to the future ranking, the alert that the future ranking of the quality of the subject is within the unacceptable range; and transmit a notification, external to the graphical output, to a messaging address associated with an auditor of the subject. 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the instructions to determine the future ranking of the quality of the subject comprise instructions to: access a data repository, the data repository storing multiple answers to multiple questions associated with multiple different subjects; determine, based on data in the data repository, a relationship of past answers to questions to future answers to questions; and predict, based on the current input and the determined relationship, future answers to the plurality of questions for the subject, wherein the future ranking of the quality of the subject is determined based on the predicted future answers. 5. The system of claim 4, wherein the multiple different subjects are geographically located within a threshold distance of the subject or within a same jurisdiction as the subject. 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the graphical output comprises a scroll bar and a scroll thumb, and wherein the electronically transmitting comprises: causing display of a first ranking of the subject, the first ranking being associated with a first time, wherein the first time is a past time, a current time, or a future time; receiving a first user input corresponding to moving the scroll thumb in a first direction along the scroll bar; and causing display, in response to the first user input corresponding to moving the scroll thumb in the first direction along the scroll bar, of a second ranking of the subject, the second ranking being associated with a second time, wherein the second time is later than the first time. 7. The system of claim 6, wherein the instructions to provide the graphical output corresponding to the overall ranking and the future ranking of the quality of the subject further comprise instructions to: receive, after causing display of the second ranking of the subject, a second user input corresponding to moving the scroll thumb in a second direction along the scroll bar, the second direction being different from the first direction; and cause display, in response to the second user input corresponding to moving the scroll thumb in the second direction along the scroll bar, of a third ranking of the subject, the third ranking being associated with a third time, wherein the third time is earlier than the second time. 8. A non-transitory machine-readable medium comprising instructions which, when executed by one or more processors of a machine, cause the machine to perform operations comprising: accessing a current input representing answers to a plurality of questions about a subject, each answer representing a ranking of a quality of the subject at a specified time, wherein the subject has a geographic location; determining, based on the current input, an overall ranking of the quality of the subject; determining, based on the current input and based on input received about the subject at a time different from the specified time and input about other subjects proximate to the geographic location, a future ranking of the quality of the subject; and electronically transmitting, to a computing device for display at the computing device, a graphical output corresponding to the overall ranking and the future ranking of the quality of the subject. 9. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 8, wherein the operations further comprise: determining that the future ranking of the quality of the subject is within an unacceptable range; and providing an alert that the future ranking of the quality of the subject is within the unacceptable range. 10. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 9, wherein providing the alert that the future ranking of the quality of the subject is within the unacceptable range comprises: transmitting for display, within the graphical output corresponding to the future ranking, the alert that the future ranking of the quality of the subject is within the unacceptable range; and transmitting a notification, external to the graphical output, to a messaging address associated with an auditor of the subject. 11. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 8, wherein determining the future ranking of the quality of the subject comprises: accessing a data repository, the data repository storing multiple answers to multiple questions associated with multiple different subjects; determining, based on data in the data repository, a relationship of past answers to questions to future answers to questions; and predicting, based on the current input and the determined relationship, future answers to the plurality of questions for the subject, wherein the future ranking of the quality of the subject is determined based on the predicted future answers. 12. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 11, wherein the multiple different subjects are geographically located within a threshold distance of the subject or within a same jurisdiction as the subject. 13. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 8, wherein the graphical output comprises a scroll bar and a scroll thumb, and wherein the electronically transmitting comprises: causing display of a first ranking of the subject, the first ranking being associated with a first time, wherein the first time is a past time, a current time, or a future time; receiving a first user input corresponding to moving the scroll thumb in a first direction along the scroll bar; and causing display, in response to the first user input corresponding to moving the scroll thumb in the first direction along the scroll bar, of a second ranking of the subject, the second ranking being associated with a second time, wherein the second time is later than the first time. 14. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 13, wherein providing the graphical output corresponding to the overall ranking and the future ranking of the quality of the subject further comprises: receiving, after causing display of the second ranking of the subject, a second user input corresponding to moving the scroll thumb in a second direction along the scroll bar, the second direction being different from the first direction; and causing display, in response to the second user input corresponding to moving the scroll thumb in the second direction along the scroll bar, of a third ranking of the subject, the third ranking being associated with a third time, wherein the third time is earlier than the second time. 15. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 8, wherein the ranking comprises either a qualitative or a quantitative ranking. 16. A method comprising: accessing, by one or more processors, current input representing answers to a plurality of questions about a subject, each answer representing a ranking of a quality of the subject at a specified time, wherein the subject has a geographic location; determining, by the one or more processors, based on the current input, an overall ranking of the quality of the subject; determining, by the one or more processors, based on the current input and based on input received about the subject at a time different from the specified time and input about other subjects proximate to the geographic location, a future ranking of the quality of the subject; and electronically transmitting, to a computing device for display at the computing device, a graphical output corresponding to the overall ranking and the future ranking of the quality of the subject. 17. The method of claim 16, further comprising: determining that the future ranking of the quality of the subject is within an unacceptable range; and providing an alert that the future ranking of the quality of the subject is within the unacceptable range. 18. The method of claim 17, wherein providing the alert that the future ranking of the quality of the subject is within the unacceptable range comprises: transmitting for display, within the graphical output corresponding to the future ranking, the alert that the future ranking of the quality of the subject is within the unacceptable range; and transmitting a notification, external to the graphical output, to a messaging address associated with an auditor of the subject. 19. The method of claim 16, wherein determining the future ranking of the quality of the subject comprises: accessing a data repository, the data repository storing multiple answers to multiple questions associated with multiple different subjects; determining, based on data in the data repository, a relationship of past answers to questions to future answers to questions; and predicting, based on the current input and the determined relationship, future answers to the plurality of questions for the subject, wherein the future ranking of the quality of the subject is determined based on the predicted future answers. 20. The method of claim 19, wherein the multiple different subjects are geographically located within a threshold distance of the subject or within a same jurisdiction as the subject.