LASSO constraints can lead to a Gaussian mixture copula model that is more robust, better conditioned, and more reflective of the actual clusters in the training data. These qualities of the GMCM have been shown with data obtained from: digital images of fine needle aspirates of breast tissue for detecting cancer; email for detecting spam; two dimensional terrain data for detecting hills and valleys; and video sequences of hand movements to detect gestures. Using training data, a GMCM estimate can be produced and iteratively refined to maximize a penalized log likelihood estimate until sequential iterations are within a threshold value of one another. The GMCM estimate can then be used to classify further samples. The LASSO constraints help keep the analysis tractibe such that useful results can be found and used while the result is still useful.
Please help me write a proper abstract based on the patent claims. CLAIM: 1. A method for classifying a sample into one of a plurality of categories and indicating to a remote computer a most likely category wherein the most likely category is that one of the categories to which the sample most likely belongs, the method comprising: obtaining clustered data from at least one server, the at least one server comprising at least one server processor and a non-transient memory storing the training samples, wherein the clustered data comprises a plurality of training samples, and wherein the training samples are multivariate; estimating, by at least one processor, a Gaussian mixture copula model (GMCM) of the clustered data wherein the GMCM is described by a parameter set, wherein the parameter set comprises a plurality of weights, a plurality of mean vectors, a plurality of covariance matrices, and a plurality of marginal distributions, and wherein the parameter set is refined by iteratively maximizing a penalized log likelihood estimate until sequential iterations fail to change the penalized log likelihood estimate by more than a threshold value to thereby produce an estimated GMCM; providing, to a remote computer, access to an input port wherein the remote computer accesses the input port over the internet accepting the sample from the remote computer; calculating a value by plugging the sample into the estimated GMCM wherein the value indicates the most likely category; and providing the remote computer with a response that indicates the most likely category. 2. The method of claim 1 wherein estimating the GMCM comprises: standardizing the clustered data by subtracting a mean value of the training samples from the training samples and then dividing each training sample by a sample standard deviation; and initializing the parameter set after standardizing the clustered data, wherein each weight is greater than zero, wherein the weights sum to one, and wherein the covariance matrices are positive definite. 3. The method of claim 1 wherein estimating the GMCM comprises setting the marginal distributions to equal scaled empirical marginal distributions. 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the clustered data is obtained from a plurality of digital images of a plurality of fine needle aspirates of breast tissue and wherein the categories comprise malignant and benign. 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the clustered data comprise attributes obtained from email and wherein the categories comprise spam and not spam. 6. The method of claim I wherein each training sample comprises a plurality of points on a two dimensional graph representative of geographical terrain and wherein the categories comprise hill and valley. 7. The method of claim 1 wherein each training sample comprises a plurality values obtained from video sequences of hand movement and wherein the categories comprise a plurality of hand movement types. 8. A method for classifying a sample into one of a plurality of categories and indicating to a person a most likely category wherein the most likely category is that one of the categories to which the sample most likely belongs as determined by a local computer, the method comprising: obtaining clustered data from at least one server, the at least one server comprising at least one server processor and a non-transient memory storing the training samples, wherein the clustered data comprises a plurality of training samples, and wherein the training samples are multivariate; estimating, by at least one processor, a Gaussian mixture copula model (GMCM) of the clustered data wherein the GMCM is described by a parameter set, wherein the parameter set comprises a plurality of weights, a plurality of mean vectors, a plurality of covariance matrices, and a plurality of marginal distributions, and wherein the parameter set is refined by iteratively maximizing a penalized log likelihood estimate until sequential iterations fail to change the penalized log likelihood estimate by, more than a threshold value to thereby produce an estimated GMCM; and providing a classification application to the local computer wherein the local computer accepts the sample and provides the sample to the classification application, wherein the classification application calculates a value by plugging the sample into the estimated GMCM, wherein the value indicates the most likely category, and wherein the local computer indicates the most likely category to a person. 9. The method of claim 8 further comprising providing the parameter set to the local computer wherein the application program inputs the parameter set to thereby instantiate the estimated GMCM. 10. The method of claim 9 wherein estimating the GMCM comprises: standardizing the clustered data by subtracting a mean value of the training samples from the training samples and then dividing each training sample by a sample standard deviation; and initializing the parameter set after standardizing the clustered data, wherein each weight is greater than zero, wherein the weights sum to one, and wherein the covariance matrices are positive definite. 11. The method of claim 8 wherein estimating the GMCM comprises setting the marginal distributions to equal scaled empirical marginal distributions. 12. The method of claim 10 wherein the clustered data is obtained from a plurality of digital images of a plurality of fine needle aspirates of breast tissue and wherein the categories comprise malignant and benign. 13. The method of claim 10 wherein the clustered data comprises attributes obtained from email and wherein the categories comprise spam and not spam. 14. The method of claim 10 wherein each training sample comprises a plurality of points on a two dimensional graph representative of geographical terrain and wherein the categories comprise hill and valley. 15. The method of claim 10 wherein each training sample comprises a plurality values obtained from video sequences of hand movement and wherein the categories comprise a plurality of hand movement types. 16. A computer program product for use with a computing device, the computer programming device comprising a non-transitory computer readable medium, the non-transitory computer readable medium stores a computer program code for classifying a sample into one of a plurality of categories and reporting a most likely category wherein the most likely category is that one of the categories to which the sample most likely belongs, the computer program code is executable by one or more processors to: obtain clustered data from at least one server wherein the clustered data comprises a plurality of training samples, and wherein the training samples are multivariate; estimate a Gaussian mixture copula model (GMCM) of the clustered data wherein the GMCM is described by a parameter set, wherein the parameter set comprises a plurality of weights, a plurality of mean vectors, a plurality of covariance matrices, and a plurality of marginal distributions, and wherein the parameter set is refined by iteratively maximizing a penalized log likelihood estimate until sequential iterations fail to change the penalized log likelihood estimate by more than a threshold value to thereby produce an estimated GMCM; receive the sample; calculate a value by plugging the sample into the estimated GM CM wherein the value indicates the most likely category; and provide a response that indicates the most likely category. 17. The computer program product of claim 16 wherein the computer program code is further executable to provide the response in a graphical user interface. 18. The computer program product of claim 16 wherein the computer program code is further executable to receive the sample over the Internet and to send the response over the internee to a remote computer. 19. The computer program product of claim 1 wherein the computer program code is further executable to: standardize the clustered data by subtracting a mean value of the training samples from the training samples and then dividing each training sample by a sample standard deviation; and initialize the parameter set after standardizing the clustered data, wherein each weight is greater than zero, wherein the weights sum to one, and wherein the covariance matrices are positive definite. 20. The computer program product of claim 16 wherein estimating the GMCM comprises setting the marginal distributions to equal scaled empirical marginal distributions.