A device and method for generating a crime type combination based on historical incident data. The device includes a memory and an electronic processor. The memory includes historical incident data, which includes a plurality of incidents, each having a crime type. The electronic processor is configured to obtain a sample set of incidents from the historical incident data for each crime type of a plurality of unique crime type combinations. The electronic processor is configured to for each crime type combination, compute a distance correlation between the sample sets of incidents of crime types forming the crime type combination. The electronic processor is configured to select a crime type combination from the plurality of crime type combinations based on the distance correlations of the plurality of crime type combinations, and generate a crime prediction geographic area for the selected crime type combination.
Please help me write a proper abstract based on the patent claims. CLAIM: 1. A crime type combination prediction device comprising: a memory including historical incident data, the historical incident data including a plurality of incidents each having a crime type; and an electronic processor coupled to the memory and configured to obtain a sample set of incidents from the historical incident data for each crime type of a plurality of crime type combinations, each crime type combination including a unique combination of crime types, for each crime type combination, compute a statistical dependency between the sample sets of incidents of crime types forming the crime type combination, select a crime type combination from the plurality of crime type combinations based on the statistical dependencies of the plurality of crime type combinations, and generate a crime prediction geographic area for the selected crime type combination. 2. The device of claim 1, wherein a first crime type combination of the plurality of crime type combinations has a first sample set of incidents for a first crime type and a second sample set of incidents for a second crime type, the first sample set of incidents being smaller than the second sample set of incidents. 3. The device of claim 2, wherein computing the statistical dependency for the first crime type combination includes the electronic processor resampling the second sample set of incidents using a sample size of the first sample set of incidents. 4. The device of claim 1, wherein the electronic processor is configured to compare the statistical dependencies of the plurality of crime type combinations; and select the selected crime type combination from the plurality of crime type combinations based on the crime type combination with the maximum statistical dependency value. 5. The device of claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of incidents has an incident location and an incident time, and wherein the electronic processor is configured to compute a statistical dependency between the sample sets of incidents of crime types forming the crime type combination based on the incident location and the incident time for each of the plurality of incidents. 6. The device of claim 1, wherein the statistical dependency is a distance correlation. 7. The device of claim 1, further comprising a display coupled to the electronic processor, the electronic processor configured to generate a map on the display including the crime prediction geographic area. 8. The device of claim 7, wherein the electronic processor is configured to generate further crime prediction geographic areas for the selected crime type combination; and include on the map the further crime prediction geographic areas. 9. The device of claim 7, wherein the electronic processor is configured to assign a responder from a plurality of responders to the crime prediction geographic area, generate a route for the responder based on the crime prediction geographic area. 10. A method for generating a crime type combination based on historical incident data that includes a plurality of incidents each having a crime type, the method comprising: obtaining, by an electronic processor, a sample set of incidents from the historical incident data for each crime type of a plurality of crime type combinations, each crime type combination including a unique combination of crime types; computing, by the electronic processor for each crime type combination, a statistical dependency between the sample sets of incidents of crime types forming the crime type combination; selecting, by the electronic processor, a crime type combination from the plurality of crime type combinations based on the statistical dependencies of the plurality of crime type combinations; and generating, by the electronic processor, a crime prediction geographic area for the selected crime type combination. 11. The method of claim 10, wherein a first crime type combination of the plurality of crime type combinations has a first sample set of incidents for a first crime type and a second sample set of incidents for a second crime type, the first sample set of incidents being smaller than the second sample set of incidents. 12. The method of claim 11, wherein computing the statistical dependency for the first crime type combination includes resampling the second sample set of incidents using a sample size of the first sample set of incidents. 13. The method of claim 10, further comprising: comparing the statistical dependencies of the plurality of crime type combinations; and selecting a crime type combination based on the crime type combination with the maximum statistical dependency value. 14. The method of claim 10, wherein each of the plurality of incidents has an incident location and an incident time, and wherein computing a statistical dependency between the sample sets of incidents of crime types includes computing a statistical dependency based on the incident location and the incident time for each of the plurality of incidents. 15. The method of claim 10, wherein computing the statistical dependency for each crime type combination includes computing a distance correlation for each crime type combination. 16. The method of claim 9, further comprising: generating, on a display coupled to the electronic processor, a map including the crime prediction geographic area. 17. The method of claim 16, further comprising: generating further crime prediction geographic areas for the selected crime type combination; and including on the map the further crime prediction geographic areas. 18. The method of claim 16, further comprising: assigning a responder from a plurality of responders to the crime prediction geographic area, generating a route for the responder based on the crime prediction geographic area.