One embodiment is directed towards a method for determining a worst-case execution time (WCET) with a desired probability of exceedance. The method includes estimating distribution function parameters for an M set of execution times for each of a Gumbel, Fréchet, and Weibull extreme value theory (EVT) distribution functions. The method can determine whether the M set of execution times fits any of the EVT distribution functions. For each of the EVT distribution functions that fits the M set of execution times, a minimum number of execution times can be calculated. For each of the EVT distribution functions that fits the M set of execution times and in which the M set of execution times has at least as many execution times as the minimum number of execution times, a WCET can be calculated for the M set of execution times to the desired probability of exceedance.
Please help me write a proper abstract based on the patent claims. CLAIM: 1. A method for determining a worst-case execution time (WCET) with a desired probability of exceedance for an application executed on a system, the method comprising: extracting a longest execution time from each of a plurality of blocks of execution times to form an M set of execution times, each execution time corresponding to a length of time in which the application is executed on the system; estimating distribution function parameters for the M set of execution times for each of a Gumbel, Fréchet, and Weibull extreme value theory (EVT) distribution functions; determining whether the M set of execution times fits any of the EVT distribution functions based on the distribution function parameters for the respective EVT distribution and at least one goodness of fit test; for each of the EVT distribution functions that fits the M set of execution times, calculating a minimum number of execution times to determine the WCET using the respective EVT distribution function based on the desired probability of exceedance; comparing each minimum number of execution times with a number of execution times in the M set of execution times; and for each of the EVT distribution functions that fits the M set of execution times and in which the M set of execution times has at least as many execution times as the minimum number of execution times for the respective EVT distribution function, calculating a WCET for the M set of execution times to the desired probability of exceedance. 2. The method of claim 1, comprising: verifying whether the execution times in the plurality of blocks are identically distributed; and indicating that any WCET based on the plurality of blocks may be in error if the execution times in the plurality of blocks are not identically distributed. 3. The method of claim 2, wherein verifying whether the execution times in the plurality of blocks are identically distributed includes: creating a plurality of histograms for the plurality of blocks; calculating a chi-squared statistic for the plurality of blocks; calculating critical values for the plurality of blocks; if the chi-squared statistic is less than or equal to each of the critical values, determining that the plurality of blocks are identically distributed; and if the chi-squared statistic is greater than one or more of the critical values, determining that the plurality of blocks are not identically distributed. 4. The method of claim 1, comprising: verifying whether the execution times in the plurality of blocks are sufficiently independent; and indicating that any WCET based on the plurality of blocks may be in error if the execution times in the plurality of blocks are not sufficiently independent. 5. The method of claim 4, wherein verifying whether the execution times in the plurality of blocks are independent includes: applying an autocorrelation test to the execution times in the plurality of blocks; if the autocorrelation test indicates that the execution times in the plurality of blocks have no dependencies, determining that the plurality of blocks are sufficiently independent; if the autocorrelation test indicates that the execution times in the plurality of blocks have some dependencies, verifying whether the dependencies are boundable by the autocorrelation test and whether the execution times in the plurality of blocks are stationary; if the dependencies are boundable and the execution times in the plurality of blocks are stationary, determining that the plurality of blocks are sufficiently independent; and if the dependencies are not boundable or the execution times in the plurality of blocks are not stationary, determining that the plurality of blocks are not sufficiently independent. 6. The method of claim 1, wherein estimating distribution function parameters includes applying a maximum likelihood method. 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one goodness of fit test includes a Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness of fit test and a chi-squared goodness of fit test with a significance level in the range of 0.01 to 0.10. 8. The method of claim 1, comprising: if the M set of execution times does not fit any of the EVT distribution functions and a number of blocks in the plurality of blocks is greater than or equal to a threshold, dividing the plurality of blocks into pairs of adjacent blocks; merging the pairs of adjacent blocks to form an updated plurality of blocks; and restarting the method with the updated plurality of blocks. 9. The method of claim 8, if the M set of execution times does not fit any of the EVT distribution functions and a number of blocks in the plurality of blocks is less than the threshold, aborting the computation of the WCET from the plurality of blocks. 10. The method of claim 1, wherein calculating a minimum number of execution times includes calculating the minimum number of execution times as a natural logarithm function of the desired probability of exceedance divided by a natural logarithm function of a result of the respective EVT distribution function of a longest execution time in the M set of execution times. 11. The method of claim 1, comprising: if the M set of execution times fits one or more of the EVT distribution functions, but has less than the minimum number of execution times for each of the one or more of the EVT distribution functions, decreasing the desired probability of exceedance to a value in which the M set of execution times has at least the minimum number of execution times for the one or more EVT distribution functions; and calculating the WCET for the M set of execution times to the decreased desired probability of exceedance. 12. The method of claim 1, comprising: if multiple WCET are calculated, selecting from the multiple WCET, a WCET having the longest time value as a WCET to output for the plurality of blocks. 13. The method of claim 1, wherein calculating the WCET for the M set of execution times includes calculating the WCET as an inverse function of the respective EVT distribution function at a percentile corresponding to the decreased desired probability of exceedance. 14. An apparatus for determining a worst-case execution time (WCET) with a desired probability of exceedance for an application executed on a system, the apparatus comprising: one or more processing devices; one or more data storage devices coupled to the one or more processing devices, the one or more data storage devices including instructions which, when executed by the one or more processing devices, cause the one or more processing devices to: extract a longest execution time from each of a plurality of blocks of execution times to form an M set of execution times, each execution time corresponding to a length of time in which the application executes on the system; estimate distribution function parameters for the M set of execution times for each of a Gumbel, Fréchet, and Weibull extreme value theory (EVT) distribution functions; determine whether the M set of execution times fits any of the EVT distribution functions based on the distribution function parameters for the respective EVT distribution and at least one goodness of fit test; for each of the EVT distribution functions that fits the M set of execution times, calculate a minimum number of execution times to determine the WCET using the respective EVT distribution function based on the desired probability of exceedance; compare each minimum number of execution times with a number of execution times in the M set of execution times; and for each of the EVT distribution functions that fits the M set of execution times and in which the M set of execution times has at least as many execution times as the minimum number of execution times for the respective EVT distribution function, calculate a WCET for the M set of execution times to the desired probability of exceedance. 15. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the instructions cause the one or more processing devices to: verify whether the execution times in the plurality of blocks are identically distributed; and indicate that any WCET based on the plurality of blocks may be in error if the execution times in the plurality of blocks are not identically distributed. 16. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the instructions cause the one or more processing devices to: verify whether the execution times in the plurality of blocks are sufficiently independent; and indicate that any WCET based on the plurality of blocks may be in error if the execution times in the plurality of blocks are not sufficiently independent. 17. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein estimate distribution function parameters includes apply a maximum likelihood method. 18. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein calculate a minimum number of execution times includes calculate the minimum number of execution times as a natural logarithm function of the desired probability of exceedance divided by a natural logarithm function of a result of the respective EVT distribution function of a longest execution time in the M set of execution times. 19. A non-transitory processor readable medium including instructions which, when executed by one or more processing devices, cause the one or more processing devices to: extract a longest execution time from each of a plurality of blocks of execution times to form an M set of execution times, each execution time corresponding to a length of time in which the application executes on the system; estimate distribution function parameters for the M set of execution times for each of a Gumbel, Fréchet, and Weibull extreme value theory (EVT) distribution functions; determine whether the M set of execution times fits any of the EVT distribution functions based on the distribution function parameters for the respective EVT distribution and at least one goodness of fit test; for each of the EVT distribution functions that fits the M set of execution times, calculate a minimum number of execution times to determine the WCET using the respective EVT distribution function based on the desired probability of exceedance; compare each minimum number of execution times with a number of execution times in the M set of execution times; and for each of the EVT distribution functions that fits the M set of execution times and in which the M set of execution times has at least as many execution times as the minimum number of execution times for the respective EVT distribution function, calculate a WCET for the M set of execution times to the desired probability of exceedance. 20. The processor readable medium of claim 19, wherein the instructions cause the one or more processing devices to: verify whether the execution times in the plurality of blocks are identically distributed; verify whether the execution times in the plurality of blocks are sufficiently independent; and indicate that a WCET based on the plurality of blocks may be in error if the execution times in the plurality of blocks are not both identically distributed and sufficiently independent.