A method for measuring technology trends that includes providing from a plurality of inventors in a technology field a baseline of technical documents published in a time period, and detecting a number of technical document publications having at least one inventor in the plurality of inventors in the technology field. The method further includes comparing the number of technical document publications to the baseline of technical documents published in the time period. If the technical document publications exceed the baseline, the number of technical document publications are trending. Comparative analysis of the content for the technical document publications that are trending determines a measurement of similarity in technical field subgroups. Trending technical subgroups are extracted from the technical document publications that are trending with a degree of similarity above a threshold as a target technical group that is a trend.
Please help me write a proper abstract based on the patent claims. CLAIM: 1. A method for measuring technology trends comprising: analyzing for each inventor of a plurality of inventors in a technology field, a time series of publication dates for technical documents in the technology field to provide a baseline of technical documents published in a time period; detecting with a hardware processor based counter a number of technical document publications having at least one inventor in the plurality of inventors in the technology field; comparing the number of technical document publications to said baseline of technical documents filed in the time period, wherein if the technical document publications exceed the baseline of technical documents, the number of technical document publications are trending; performing a comparative analysis of the content for the technical document publications that are trending to determine a measurement of similarity in technical field subgroups described in the technical document publications that are trending; and extracting trending technical subgroups from the technical document publications that are trending with a degree of similarity above a threshold as a technical subgroup that is a trend. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the technical documents are patent applications published by a patent office. 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the technology field is selected from the classification system of a patent office. 4. The method of claim 1, wherein said detecting with a hardware processor based counter an increase in a number of publications of trending technical documents includes building a time-series model for the number of technical documents of each inventor and comparing an expected value with an actual value. 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the time-series model includes a Poisson process. 6. The method of claim 5, wherein said comparing the number of technical document publications to said baseline of technical documents filed in the time period calculating a score s from: S=−log(Px0) wherein P(x) is a distribution of a Poisson process modeled using an average number of patent applications published per month for said each inventor of said plurality of inventors in said technology field, and x0 is an observed number of patent applications published per month for said each inventor of said plurality of inventors in said technology field. 7. The method of claim 1, wherein said comparative analysis of the content for the trending technical documents to determine a measurement of similarity in technical field subgroups described in the trending technical documents further comprises identifying a keyword as a keyword indicating a trending technology from an extracted subgroup of technical documents by using an index. 8. The method of claim 5, wherein the comparative analysis comprises Kullback-Leibler divergence, Pointwise Mutual Information (PMI) or a combination thereof. 9. The method of claim 1 further comprising providing an index of terms for said technology subgroups that are trending. 10. The method of claim 9, wherein providing the index comprises Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TFIDF), Pointwise Mutual Information (PMI) or a combination thereof. 11. A system for detecting technology trends comprising: a database of inventors in a technology field; a baseline generator for providing a baseline frequency of technical publications published by each inventor of said database for a specified time period; a counter for determining from technical publications whether there is an increase in technical publications for at least one of the inventors in the database of inventors in the technological field; and a comparison module for determining whether the technical publications providing the increase in the technical publications have technology subgroups with a frequency that is greater than a target trend frequency that indicates a technical subgroup as a trend. 12. The system of claim 11, wherein the technical documents are patent applications published by a patent office. 13. The system of claim 11, wherein the technology field is selected from the classification system of a patent office. 14. The system of claim 11, wherein the counter detects an increase in a number of publications by creating a time-series model for the number of technical documents of each inventor and comparing an expected value of technical publication with an actual value of technical publications. 15. The system of claim 14, wherein said creating the time-series model includes a Poisson process. 16. The system of claim 15, wherein said comparing the number of expected technical document publications to the actual technical documents published in the time period calculating a score s from: S=−log(Px0) wherein P(x) is a distribution of a Poisson process modeled using an average number of patent applications published per month for said each inventor of said plurality of inventors in said technology field, and x0 is an observed number of patent applications published per month for said each inventor of said plurality of inventors in said technology field. 17. The system of claim 15, wherein said comparison module performs a comparative analysis of the content for the technical publications to determine a measurement of similarity in technical field subgroups described that comprises identifying a keyword as a keyword indicating an extracted subgroup of technical documents by using an index. 18. The system of claim 15, wherein the comparison module performs a comparative analysis comprising Kullback-Leibler divergence, Pointwise Mutual Information (PMI) or a combination thereof. 19. The system of claim 15 further comprising a term extractor that provides an index of terms for technology subgroups that are trending. 20. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium comprising a computer readable program for determining technology trends, wherein the computer readable program when executed on a computer causes the computer to perform the steps of: analyzing for each inventor of a plurality of inventors in a technology field, a time series of publication dates for technical documents in the technology field to provide a baseline of technical documents published in a time period; detecting with a counter a number of technical document publications having at least one inventor in the plurality of inventors in the technology field; comparing the number of technical document publications to said baseline of technical documents published in the time period, wherein if the technical document publications exceed the baseline of technical documents, the number of technical document publications are trending; performing a comparative analysis of the content for the technical document publications that are trending to determine a measurement of similarity in technical field subgroups described in the technical document publications that are trending; and extracting trending technical subgroups from the technical document publications that are trending with a degree of similarity above a threshold as a technical subgroup that is a trend.