The present invention consists of a computer-implemented system and method for automatically analyzing and coding documents into content categories suitable for high cost, high yield settings where quality and efficiency of classification are essential. A prototypical example application field is legal document predictive coding for purposes of e-discovery and litigation (or litigation readiness) where the automated classification of documents as “responsive” or not must be (a) efficient, (b) accurate, and (c) defensible in court. Many text classification technologies exist but they focus on the relatively simple steps of using a training method on training data, producing a model and testing it on test data. They invariably do not address effectively and simultaneously key quality assurance requirements. The invention applies several data design and validation steps that ensure quality and removal of all possible sources of document classification error or deficiencies. The invention employs multiple classification methods, preprocessing methods, visualization and organization of results, and explanation of models which further enhance predictive quality, but also ease of use of models and user acceptance. The invention can be applied to practically any field where text classification is desired.
Please help me write a proper abstract based on the patent claims. CLAIM: 1. A quality-assurance oriented computer-implemented method and system for automatically classifying text using machine learning comprising the following steps: a) eliciting user goals, classification tasks, user error tolerances and desired performance targets, analysis timelines, availability of data, feasibility of data collection, availability of computing resources, acceptable costs, and user cost constraints (step 1); b) presenting to users and obtaining their preferences and approvals related to a data and computing environment design including data management plan, data security plan, and high performance computing plan (step 2); c) collecting data needed for model training and verification, accessing individual computers or centralized servers that contain the document data, sampling documents for training and testing, labeling sampled data or re-using existing labels (step 3); d) performing quality control of the document data by ensuring accurate digital representation and conversions of documents to formats that are machine processable, and ensuring accurate and consistent labeling by the users through resolution of disagreements in labeling and statistical application of inter-rater reliability metrics (step 4); e) performing feasibility modeling, including preliminary modeling, model quality control, and model explanation (step 5); f) assessing class imbalance and using the information for adjusting data collection , and conducting model training and verification (step 6); g) optimizing the feasibility model of step 5 via additional sampling, improving labeling and classification guidelines, adding in the training corpus labeled documents from other document collections, adding unsampled labeled documents, and optionally performing model calibration and thresholding (step 7); h) iterating steps 1 to 6 until the user is satisfied with the model performance; i) producing intellectual property related documentation (step 8); j) verifying the optimized model of step 7 (step 9) and ensuring quality control of the verification process (step 10) by producing a second labeled sample from the data of step 3, using a predefined set of documents not used to train the model, conducting user verification of a random selection of documents from a training cross-validation step, or using a random selection of documents from the second subset randomly labeled; k) iterating steps 7 to 10 until the user is satisfied with the model performance; l) explaining the optimized and verified model by translating it to more human-accessible forms such as decision trees and rule sets and showing how the classification is made by the various classifiers; analyzing the predictivity of individual words and word patterns used by the model (step 11); m) applying the final model to the application set of documents (step 12); n) deploying the final model in a computational environment for continuous future use (step 13); o) performing additional predictive modeling and coding for additional classification tasks (step 14); and p) completing the analysis and outputting a detailed report (step 15). 2. The computer-implemented method and system of claim 1 where document sampling is conducted by random sampling. 3. The computer-implemented method and system of claim 1 where document sampling is conducted by stratified sampling. 4. The computer-implemented method and system of claim 1 where document sampling is conducted by convenience (case-control non-random) sampling. 5. The computer-implemented method and system of claim 1 where document sampling is conducted by active learning based iterative sampling. 6. The computer-implemented method and system of claim 1 where the human labeling includes single person labeling or collaborative labeling approaches. 7. The computer-implemented method and system of claim 1 where models are built using a multitude of text classification methods and the best model and learning method are selected or models are combined. 8. The computer-implemented method and system of claim 1 where a third set of documents is applied to a preexisting model comprising the following steps: i. Verifying the model with application of steps 9 and 10; ii. if the model performs as expected or desired on this new set, then the process continuing with steps 12, 13, 14, and 15; and iii. if the model does not perform as expected, then steps 1-7 iterating until desired accuracy is obtained.