In an approach for generating a selectivity estimation, one or more processors generate an artificial neural network and receive a DBMS query comprising one or more predicates. One or more processors replace one or more predicates in the one or more predicates that have strict operators with one or more predicates that have non-strict operators. One or more processors generate a selectivity function from the one or more predicates that has one or more arguments that are each comprised of an upper bound and a lower bound for a value in a predicate. One or more processors generate a training data set from a data distribution in the database and train the artificial neural network on the training data set to compute the selectivity function. One or more processors generate a selectivity estimation with the artificial neural network for one or more predicates in the DBMS query.
Please help me write a proper abstract based on the patent claims. CLAIM: 1. A method for generating a selectivity estimation, the method comprising: generating, by one or more processors, an artificial neural network with a hidden layer comprising one or more neurons, wherein the one or more neurons are grouped into one or more groups of neurons, wherein each neuron in a group of neurons in the one or more groups of neurons compute with a common jump activation function; receiving, by one or more processors, a DBMS query comprising one or more predicates, wherein a predicate in the one or more predicates operates on one or more database columns; converting, by one or more processors, one or more strict operators in the one or more predicates to one or more non-strict operators in the one or more predicates, generating, by one or more processors, a selectivity function from the one or more predicates, wherein the selectivity function has one or more arguments, wherein an argument in the one or more arguments is an upper bound and a lower bound for a value in a predicate in the one or more predicates; generating, by one or more processors, a training data set for the artificial neural network from a data distribution in the one or more database columns; training, by one or more processors, the artificial neural network on the training data set to compute the selectivity function; and generating, by one or more processors, a selectivity estimation with the artificial neural network for one or more predicates in the DBMS query. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the converting, by one or more processors, of strict operators to non-strict operators is comprised of: replacing, by one or more processors, a first predicate, in the one or more predicates, that operates on a first value with an equal to operator, with a second predicate that operates on the first value with a greater than or is equal to operator and a third predicate that operates on the first value with an is less than or is equal to operator; replacing, by one or more processors, a fourth predicate, in the one or more predicates, that operates on a second value in a first database column with a is less than or is greater than operator, with a fifth predicate that operates on the second value with a is greater than operator and a sixth predicate that operates on the second value with a is less than operator; replacing, by one or more processors, a strict range greater than operator in a seventh predicate, in the one or more predicates, that operates on a third value in a second database column, with a non-strict range greater than or equal to operator that operates on a fourth value in the second database column, wherein the fourth value is a smallest value in the second database column that is greater than the third value; and replacing, by one or more processors, a strict range less than operator in an eighth predicate, in the one or more predicates, that operates on a fifth value in a third database column, with a non-strict range less than or equal to operator that operates on a sixth value in the third database column, wherein the sixth value is a largest value in the third database column that is less than the fifth value. 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the jump activation function in a neuron in the one or more neurons is: ϕ k  ( x ) = { 0 for   x < 0 ( 1 -  - x ) k for   x ≥ 0 , wherein x is a value computed from one or more inputs to the neuron and k is a positive integer. 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the output of the artificial neural network is a linear combination of an output from one or more neurons in the hidden layer. 5. The method of claim 2, wherein the fourth value is computed with an upper bound artificial neural network that takes the third value as an input and the sixth value is computed with a lower bound artificial neural network that takes the fifth value as an input. 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the artificial neural network is a recurrent artificial neural network. 7. The method of claim 3, wherein the hidden layer is comprised of a first group of neurons that uses the jump activation function with k=1 and a second group of neurons that uses the jump activation function with k=2. 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the jump activation function is a non-constant, bounded, continuous, and monotonically increasing function.