A computer-implemented method is provided for analysing and designing a physical environment for discouraging criminal activity within the physical environment. The physical environment is assessed and risk factors are identified that make the physical environment vulnerable to criminal activity. In one embodiment, risks posed by the nature and location of the physical environment within a spatial footprint are calculated. Further, the physical environment is evaluated to identify physical elements of the environment that could make the structure vulnerable to criminal attacks. Risk scores assigned to all of these factors are then analyzed to generate a recommendation report for at least one of the physical elements. Deploying at least one of the recommendations in the report aids in improving a deterrent rating assigned to that physical element and subsequently integrity of the physical environment against criminal attacks.
Please help me write a proper abstract based on the patent claims. CLAIM: 1. A computer-implemented method of analysing and designing a physical environment for discouraging criminal activity within the physical environment, the method comprising: calculating a first risk score based on classification of the physical environment within a pre-determined category; calculating a second risk score based on the geographical location of the physical environment; calculating a third risk score based on review of management and security policies of the physical environment; calculating a fourth risk score by extracting from the physical environment's three dimensional data, attributes of pre-determined physical elements which contribute to the structural layout and working of the physical environment; assigning a deterrent rating to each of the physical elements based on divergence or adherence of the extracted attributes to threshold attributes for the physical elements; and calculating the fourth risk score based on the assigned deterrent ratings; and generating a recommendation report for at least one of the physical elements for improving the deterrent rating assigned thereto, the recommendation report being generated based on the first risk score, the second risk score, the third risk score and the fourth risk score. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein improvement of the deterrent rating comprises improving detectability of a motivated offender within the physical environment thereby discouraging the motivated offender from committing the crime activity within the physical environment. 3. The method of claim 1 further comprising: calculating an overall risk score based on the first risk score, the second risk score, the third risk score and the fourth risk score; comparing the overall risk score with a pre-determined threshold risk range; and generating the recommendation report if the overall score is outside the pre-determined threshold risk range. 4. The method of claim 3 wherein if the overall risk score is outside the pre-determined threshold risk range, the method further comprising: comparing the assigned deterrent ratings with pre-set deterrent threshold values; and generating the recommendation report if the assigned deterrent ratings are below the pre-set deterrent threshold values. 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of classifying the physical environment within a pre-determined category is carried out on the basis of data received regarding the function of the physical environment. 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of assigning a second risk score further comprises: retrieving historical crime data linked to the geographical location of the physical environment from a database, and surveying the physical environment and geographical location for collaborating indicators contributing to the retrieved historical crime data. 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the collaborating indicators contributing to the retrieved crime data comprises at least one of graffiti writing, broken windows and unmaintained roads. 8. The method of claim 6, wherein the database is maintained by a national, federal, provincial or municipal policing body. 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of assigning the deterrent rating to each of the physical elements comprises displaying a set of questions regarding the attributes of the physical element. 10. The method of claim 9 further comprising selecting an appropriate set of questions for display based on fit of the physical environment within the pre-determined category. 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the pre-determined physical elements comprise elements governing at least one entry and at least one exit to the physical environment, vehicular and/or human traffic about and within the physical environment, landscaping surrounding the physical environment, illumination profile about and within the physical environment, and signage about and within the physical environment. 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the physical environment is a pre-existing environment or a new physical environment. 13. The method of claim 12, wherein if the physical environment is new, the recommendation report contains recommendations for modifying a design plan of the physical environment. 14. The method of claim 12, wherein if the physical environment is pre-existing, the recommendation report contains recommendations for rehabilitation of at least one physical element associated with the physical environment. 15. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of extracting attributes comprises review of a design plan of the physical environment or survey of the physical environment by personnel. 16. A computer based system for analysing and designing a physical environment for deterring a motivated offender from committing a crime within the physical environment, the system comprising: a memory; a processing structure coupled to the memory and executing computer-readable code for calculating a first risk score based on classification of the physical environment within a pre-determined category; calculating a second risk score based on the geographical location of the physical environment; calculating a third risk score based on review of management and security policies of the physical environment; calculating a fourth risk score based on a deterrent rating assigned to at least one physical element of the physical environment; and generating a recommendation report for the at least one physical element for improving the deterrent rating assigned thereto, the recommendation report being generated based on the first risk score, the second risk score, the third risk score and the fourth risk score. 17. The system of claim 16, wherein the deterrent rating assigned to the at least one physical element comprises extracting attributes of the at least one physical element by receiving input to a set of questions regarding the attributes and comparing the extracted attributes with pre-set threshold attribute values for the at least one physical element. 18. The system of claim 16 further comprising at least one database for storing the set of questions and at least one interactive unit to display the set of questions. 19. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium comprising computer-executable instructions for analysing and designing a physical environment for deterring a motivated offender from committing a crime within the physical environment, the instructions, when executed, cause a processor to perform process steps comprising: calculating a first risk score based on classification of the physical environment within a pre-determined category; calculating a second risk score based on the geographical location of the physical environment; calculating a third risk score based on review of management and security policies of the physical environment; calculating a fourth risk score based on a deterrent rating assigned to at least one physical element of the physical environment; and generating a recommendation report for the at least one physical element for improving the deterrent rating assigned thereto, the recommendation report being generated based on the first risk score, the second risk score, the third risk score and the fourth risk score.