A method of decision tree based search result ranking includes obtaining a training data set for generating at least one decision tree, the training data set having N training features and N greater than or equal to 2. The method further includes dividing a computational system of decision trees into N feature work groups corresponding to the N training features respectively, and by use of the feature work groups, computing splitting nodes and splitting values corresponding to the splitting nodes for the decision trees. The method also includes generating the decision trees using the computed splitting nodes and the corresponding splitting values; and ranking search results using the decision trees.
Please help me write a proper abstract based on the patent claims. CLAIM: 1. A method of decision tree based search result ranking, the method comprising: obtaining a training data set for generating at least one decision tree, the training data set having N training features, wherein N is greater than or equal to 2; dividing a computational system of decision trees into N feature work groups corresponding to the N training features respectively; computing, based upon the feature work groups, optimal splitting nodes and optimal splitting values corresponding to the optimal splitting nodes for the decision trees; generating the decision trees using the computed optimal splitting nodes and the corresponding optimal splitting values; and ranking search results using the decision trees. 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising: computing, when a total number of the generated decision trees is greater than or equal to 2, splitting of the nodes by determining whether a number of splitting nodes computed for the decision tree exceeds a pre-determined threshold value. 3. The method of claim 2, further comprising: computing, if the number of the optimal splitting nodes does not exceed the threshold value for each feature work group, an optimal splitting value for the training feature corresponding to the feature work group; transmitting, when a present splitting value for a present decision tree is selected from substantially all the optimal splitting values for the training feature of the feature work groups, amongst the feature work groups, assigning the training feature corresponding to the feature group from which the selected present splitting value is computed as a present optimal splitting node for the present decision tree; and splitting, by use of the feature work group corresponding to the selected splitting value and based upon a decision tree's splitting value and splitting node, the training data set to form splitting nodes, wherein a splitting result of the splitting nodes are transmitted to the computational system. 4. The method of claim 3, further comprising: dividing, when the training data set has M training samples and M is greater than or equal to 2, the computational system of decision trees by dividing each feature work group into M communication nodes corresponding to the M training samples, wherein communication nodes belonging to different feature work groups but to a same training sample form a sample work group; and computing a splitting value by computing, based upon the generated decision trees corresponding to the training data set for each sample work group, gradients for training samples of the sample work group; and computing, based on the computed gradients, for each feature work group, a splitting value for the training feature corresponding to the feature work group. 5. The method of claim 1, wherein ranking search results comprises: fitting the generated decision trees to form a ranking decision tree; and ranking search results based on degrees of relevance, wherein the search results are retrieved using search queries and the degrees of relevance are computed between the search results and the search queries using the ranking decision tree. 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the computational system of decision trees utilizes Message Passing Interface (MPI) protocols to divide feature work groups and to transmit information amongst groups. 7. The method of claim 1, further comprising obtaining the training data set from search histories collected on an e-commerce platform. 8. An apparatus for ranking search results based on decision trees, the apparatus comprising: a processor; and a non-transitory computer-readable medium operably coupled to the processor, the non-transitory computer-readable medium having computer-readable instructions stored thereon to be executed when accessed by the processor, the instructions comprising: an acquisition module configured for obtaining a training data set for generating at least one decision tree, the training data set having N training features, wherein N is greater than or equal to 2; a division module configured for dividing a computational system of decision trees into N feature work groups corresponding to the N training features respectively; a computing module configured for computing, based upon the feature work groups, optimal splitting nodes and optimal splitting values corresponding to the optimal splitting nodes for the decision trees; and for generating the decision trees using the optimal splitting nodes and the corresponding optimal splitting values; and a ranking module configured for ranking search results using the decision trees. 9. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the computing module comprises: a counting sub-module configured for determining, when a total number of the generated decision trees is greater than or equal to 2, whether a number of splitting nodes computed for a decision tree exceeds a pre-determined threshold value. 10. The apparatus of claim 9, wherein the computing module further comprises: an independent computing sub-module configured for computing, if the number of the optimal splitting nodes does not exceed the threshold value for each feature work group, an optimal splitting value for the training feature corresponding to the feature work group; a node assigning sub-module configured for transmitting, when a present splitting value for a present decision tree is selected from substantially all the optimal splitting values for the training feature of the feature work groups, amongst the feature work groups, and assigning the training feature corresponding to the feature group from which the selected present splitting value is computed as a present optimal splitting node for the present decision tree; and a node splitting sub-module configured for splitting, by use of the feature work group corresponding to the selected splitting value and based upon a decision tree's splitting value and splitting node, the training data set to form splitting nodes, wherein a splitting result of the splitting nodes are transmitted to the computational system. 11. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein the division module comprises: a feature group division sub-module configured for dividing, when the training data set has M training samples and M is greater than or equal to 2, each feature work group into M communication nodes corresponding to the M training samples, wherein communication nodes belonging to different feature work groups but to a same training sample form a sample work group; and the computing sub-module comprises: a gradient computing sub-module configured for computing, based upon the generated decision trees corresponding to the training data set for each sample work group, gradients for training samples of the sample work group; and a splitting value computing sub-module configured for computing, based on the computed gradients, for each feature work group, a splitting value for the training feature corresponding to the feature work group. 12. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the ranking module comprises: a decision tree fitting sub-module configured for fitting the generated decision trees to form a ranking decision tree; and a decision tree based ranking sub-module configured for ranking search results based on degrees of relevance, wherein the search results are retrieved using search queries, the degrees of relevance are computed between the search results and the search queries using the ranking decision tree. 13. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the computational system of decision trees utilizes Message Passing Interface (MPI) protocols to divide feature work groups and to transmit information amongst groups. 14. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the acquisition module comprises a training data set acquisition sub-module configured for obtaining the training data set from search histories collected on an e-commerce platform. 15. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium having embedded therein program instructions, when executed by one or more processors of a device, causes the device to execute a process for decision tree based search result ranking, the process comprising: obtaining a training data set for generating at least one decision tree, the training data set having N training features, wherein N is greater than or equal to 2; dividing a computational system of decision trees into N feature work groups corresponding to the N training features respectively; computing, based upon the feature work groups, optimal splitting nodes and optimal splitting values corresponding to the splitting nodes for the decision trees; generating the decision trees using the computed optimal splitting nodes and the corresponding optimal splitting values; and ranking search results using the decision trees. 16. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 15, wherein the process further comprises computing, when a total number of the generated decision trees is greater than or equal to 2, splitting nodes by determining whether a number of splitting nodes computed for a decision tree exceeds a pre-determined threshold value. 17. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 16, the process further comprises: computing, if the number of the optimal splitting nodes does not exceed the threshold value for each feature work group, an optimal splitting value for the training feature corresponding to the feature work group; transmitting, when a present splitting value for a present decision tree is selected from substantially all the optimal splitting values for the training feature of the feature work groups, amongst the feature work groups, assigning the training feature corresponding to the feature group from which the selected present splitting value is computed as a present optimal splitting node for the present decision tree; and splitting, by use of the feature work group corresponding to the selected splitting value and based upon a decision tree's splitting value and splitting node, the training data set to form splitting nodes, wherein a splitting result of the splitting nodes are transmitted to the computational system. 18. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 17, wherein the process further comprises: dividing, when the training data set has M training samples and M is greater than or equal to 2, the computational system of decision trees by dividing each feature work group into M communication nodes corresponding to the M training samples, wherein communication nodes belonging to different feature work groups but to a same training sample form a sample work group; and computing a splitting value by computing, based upon the generated decision trees corresponding to the training data set for each sample work group, gradients for training samples of the sample work group; and computing, based on the computed gradients, for each feature work group, a splitting value for the training feature corresponding to the feature work group. 19. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 15, wherein ranking search results comprises: fitting the generated decision trees to form a ranking decision tree; and ranking search results based on degrees of relevance, wherein the search results are retrieved using search queries the degrees of relevance are computed between the search results and the search queries using the ranking decision tree. 20. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 15, wherein the computational system of decision trees utilizes Message Passing Interface (MPI) protocols to divide feature work groups and to transmit information amongst groups. 21. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 15, wherein obtaining training data set for at least one decision tree comprises obtaining the training data set from search histories collected on an e-commerce platform.