Systems, methods and mediums are described for processing rules and associated bags of facts generated by an application in communication with a processing engine, database and rule engine that process the bags of facts in view of the rules and generate one or more rule-dependent responses to the application which performs one or more work flows based on the responses. The rule engine may apply forward-chaining, backward-chaining or a combination of forward-chaining and backward-chaining to process the rules and facts. Numerous novel applications that work in conjunction with the processing engine, database and rule engine are also described.
Please help me write a proper abstract based on the patent claims. CLAIM: 1. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium comprising instructions for developing, testing and analyzing a product that, when executed on a computing device, cause the computing device to at least: receive data regarding the product in an application; send a message containing the data and a set of rules that apply to the data together to a rule engine to initiate a process for analyzing the data, the data being true for the set of rules for a current process state; analyze the data based on the set of rules operated within the rule engine to produce a rule-dependent response based on the data without requesting additional rules or additional data for the first set of rules from any source during the current process state; and based on the rule-dependent response, perform one or more work flows within the application related to the development, testing or analysis of the product. 2. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 1, wherein the instruction to analyze the data includes instructions to combine a forward-chaining rule with a backward-chaining rule by creating a condition within the forward-chaining rule that contains a backward-chaining query. 3. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 1, wherein the instruction to analyze the data includes instructions to combine a backward-chaining rule with a forward-chaining rule by utilizing a fact inferred from the forward-chaining rule as a goal for the backward-chaining rule, unless the forward-chaining rule contains a condition that depends on negation of another forward-chaining inference, in which case execution of the forward-chaining rule is suspended, the dependency of the rule-predicate for the problematic fact is recorded in a table, and execution of the forward-chaining rule skips to the next untried fact to select a new rule to execute. 4. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 1, wherein the data is simulation data associated with an aspect of the product being developed, wherein the rule-dependent response indicates a problem with the simulation data, and wherein the one or more work flows include alerting one or more persons regarding the problem. 5. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 1, wherein the data is testing data associated with a prototype of the product being developed, wherein the rule-dependent response indicates a problem with the testing data, and wherein the one or more work flows include alerting one or more persons regarding the problem. 6. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 1, wherein the data is analysis data associated with the product that has been developed, wherein the rule-dependent response indicates the product passes a certification, fails a certification, or is missing a part necessary to certifying the product in accordance with a standard or a regulation, and wherein the one or more work flows include alerting one or more persons regarding the product passing the certification, failing the certification or missing the part. 7. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 6, wherein one or more work flows include generating a report suitable for submission to a standard body or regulatory authority. 8. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 6, wherein one or more work flows include generating a report indicating why the product failed the certification. 9. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 6, wherein one or more work flows include generating a report indicating at least one part the product was missing and an indication of where the part could be located within the product.