An auxiliary analysis system using expert information comprises a user interface and a determination module. The user interface includes a plurality of analysis items which can be triggered by a user. The determination module coupled with the user interface includes a plurality of preliminary results corresponding to the analysis items. Each of the analysis items corresponds to at least one of the preliminary results. The user selects a plurality of analysis items to generate multiple preliminary results, and the preliminary results further generate a final judgment result by an operation process.
Please help me write a proper abstract based on the patent claims. CLAIM: 1. An auxiliary analysis system using expert information, comprising: a user interface, including a plurality of analysis items which can be triggered by a user; a determination module, coupled with the user interface, including a plurality of preliminary results corresponding to the analysis items, each of the analysis items corresponding to at least one of the preliminary results; wherein the user selects more than one analysis items to generate multiple preliminary results, and the preliminary results further generate a final judgment result by an operation process. 2. The system, as recited in claim 1, wherein the operation process includes a weighted process to generate the final judgment result according to the number of the preliminary results corresponding to the analysis items selected by the user. 3. The system, as recited in claim 1, wherein each of the preliminary results includes a weighted score and a judgment group, each judgment group corresponding to at least one of the preliminary results, the operation process respectively adding the weighted scores of the preliminary results of each of the judgment groups together and each of the judgment groups correspondingly obtaining a total weighted score. 4. The system, as recited in claim 3, wherein the operation process ranks the judgment groups by the corresponding total weighted scores. 5. The system, as recited in claim 3, wherein each of the judgment groups respectively has an attribute defining whether two of the judgment groups conflict with each other, the operation process obtaining a difference between the total weighted scores that their corresponding judgment groups conflict with each other, renewing the total weighted score of the judgment group with the higher weighted score according to the difference, removing the judgment group with the lower weighted score, and ranking the remaining judgment groups by the corresponding total weighted scores. 6. The system, as recited in claim 3, wherein each of the judgment groups respectively has an attribute defining whether two of the judgment groups conflict with each other, the operation process removing the judgment group with lower total weighted score from the judgment groups conflicting with each other, and ranking the remaining judgment groups by the corresponding total weighted scores. 7. The system, as recited in claim 1, wherein each of the preliminary results has a weighted score and an attribute defining whether two of the preliminary results can be added together, the operation process obtaining a total value by adding the weighted scores of the preliminary results that can be added together, renewing the higher weighted score of the preliminary result according to the total value, removing the preliminary result with the lower weighted score, and ranking the remaining preliminary results by the corresponding weighted scores. 8. The system, as recited in claim 1, wherein each of the preliminary results has a weighted score and an attribute defining whether two of the preliminary results conflict with each other, the operation process obtaining a difference between the weighted scores that their corresponding preliminary results conflict with each other, renewing the higher weighted score of the preliminary result according to the difference, removing the preliminary result with the lower weighted score, and ranking the remaining preliminary results by the corresponding weighted scores. 9. The system, as recited in claim 1, wherein each of the preliminary results has a weighted score and an attribute defining whether two of the preliminary results conflict with each other, the operation process removing the preliminary result with the lower weighted score that their corresponding preliminary results conflict with each other, and ranking the remaining preliminary results by the corresponding weighted scores. 10. The system, as recited in claim 1, wherein each of the analysis items corresponds to at least one analysis judging unit which correspondingly connects to at least one of the preliminary results through a hierarchical structure. 11. The system, as recited in claim 1, further comprising an administrator interface coupled with the user interface and the determination module, the administrator interface including a plurality of edition items for editing at least one selected from the analysis items and at least one of the preliminary results of each of the analysis items. 12. The system, as recited in claim 5, further comprising an administrator interface coupled with the user interface and the determination module, the administrator interface including a plurality of edition items for editing at least one selected from the analysis items, at least one of the preliminary results of each of the analysis items, each of the weighted scores corresponding to each of the preliminary results, each of the judgment groups corresponding to each of the preliminary results, and each of the attributes corresponding to each of the judgment groups. 13. The system, as recited in claim 6, further comprising an administrator interface coupled with the user interface and the determination module, the administrator interface including a plurality of edition items for editing at least one selected from the analysis items, at least one of the preliminary results of each of the analysis items, each of the weighted scores corresponding to each of the preliminary results, each of the judgment groups corresponding to each of the preliminary results, and each of the attributes corresponding to each of the judgment groups. 14. The system, as recited in claim 12, wherein the edition items apply to edit at least one of the analysis judging units, each of which correspondingly connects to at least one of the preliminary results through a hierarchical structure. 15. The system, as recited in claim 13, wherein the edition items apply to edit at least one of the analysis judging units, each of which correspondingly connects to at least one of the preliminary results through a hierarchical structure. 16. The system, as recited in claim 7, further comprising an administrator interface coupled with the user interface and the determination module, the administrator interface including a plurality of edition items for editing at least one selected from the analysis items, at least one of the preliminary results of each of the analysis items, the weighted scores corresponding to the preliminary results, and the attributes corresponding to the preliminary results. 17. The system, as recited in claim 8, further comprising an administrator interface coupled with the user interface and the determination module, the administrator interface including a plurality of edition items for editing at least one selected from the analysis items, at least one of the preliminary results of each of the analysis items, the weighted scores corresponding to the preliminary results, and the attributes corresponding to the preliminary results. 18. The system, as recited in claim 9, further comprising an administrator interface coupled with the user interface and the determination module, the administrator interface including a plurality of edition items for editing at least one selected from the analysis items, at least one of the preliminary results of each of the analysis items, the weighted scores corresponding to the preliminary results, and the attributes corresponding to the preliminary results. 19. The system, as recited in claim 16, wherein the edition items apply to edit at least one of the analysis judging units each of which correspondingly connects to at least one of the preliminary results through a hierarchical structure. 20. The system, as recited in claim 17, wherein the edition items apply to edit at least one of the analysis judging units each of which correspondingly connects to at least one of the preliminary results through a hierarchical structure. 21. The system, as recited in claim 18, wherein the edition items apply to edit at least one of the analysis judging units each of which correspondingly connects to at least one of the preliminary results through a hierarchical structure. 22. An auxiliary analysis method using expert information, the method comprising the steps of: receiving triggers of a plurality of analysis items, each of which corresponds at least one of preset preliminary results; and executing an operation process to generate a final judgment result according to a plurality of the preliminary results of the triggered analysis items. 23. The method, as recited in claim 22, further comprising the steps of: receiving a trigger of at least one edition item and obtaining editing information to edit the corresponding analysis item or the corresponding preliminary result; and saving the edited analysis item or the edited preliminary result. 24. An auxiliary analysis system using expert information, comprising: a user interface including a plurality of analysis items which can be triggered by a user; an analysis database including at last one analysis judging unit corresponding to each of the analysis items and a plurality of preliminary results connected to the analysis judging units; and an operation processor coupled to the analysis database to receive a plurality of the preliminary results from the analysis database and generate a final judgment result by an operation process. 25. The system, as recited in claim 25, further comprising an administrator interface coupled with the user interface and the analysis database, the administrator interface including a plurality of edition items for editing at least one selected from the analysis items and the preliminary results corresponding to the analysis items.