A method for use with a problem is provided. The method comprises activity on the part of a user. The user activity is structured to include a locate step involving a definition of the problem and ideation of factors that are material to the problem or to the utility of possible solutions to the problem. The user activity is also structured to include a navigate step following the locate step and involving a ranking of the factors in terms of the importance of the factor to the problem and the extent to which the factor can be controlled, a selection amongst the factors of factors that are relatively more important and/or relatively more susceptible to control, than the others, a review of the selected factors to identify viewpoints related to the factors, and a review of the selected factors from the identified viewpoints to ideate a body of insights.
Please help me write a proper abstract based on the patent claims. CLAIM: 1. A method for use with a problem, the method comprising activity on the part of the user structured to include: a locate step involving a definition of the problem; and ideation of factors that are material to the problem or to the utility of possible solutions to the problem, a navigate step following the locate step and involving a ranking of the factors in terms of the importance of the factor to the problem and the extent to which the factor can be controlled; a selection amongst the factors of factors that are relatively more important and/or relatively more susceptible to control, than the others; a review of the selected factors to identify viewpoints related to the factors; and a review of the selected factors from the identified viewpoints to ideate a body of insights. 2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the activity is structured to further include an integrate step following the navigate step, the integrate step involving: a review of the generated insights to ideate patterns and connections; ideation of possible solutions to the problem; and reviewing the possible solutions for merit to select solutions for further consideration. 3. A method according to claim 2, wherein, the integrate step involves identification of criteria which must be met in order to constitute a viable solution and the review of the possible solutions for merit involves the de-selection of those that fail to address the criteria. 4. A method according to claim 3, wherein the activity is structured to further include an investigate step preceding the integrate step, the investigate step involving: in respect of each insight, a determination of importance and a determination as to the level of confidence in the accuracy of each insight; an effort to verify insights determined to be relatively important and in respect of which there exists relatively low confidence as to accuracy; and removal of insights from the body that have been proven inaccurate as part of the verification effort. 5. A method according to claim 1, wherein in the navigate step, the relationship between the viewpoint and the factor is relatively close when the factor has been relatively lightly explored; and is relatively distant when the factor has been relatively heavily explored. 6. A method according to claim 5, wherein the viewpoint that is relatively close to the factor is the viewpoint of the factor. 7. A method according to claim 6, wherein the relatively distant relationship between the factor and the viewpoint is a relationship defined by time, space or pattern.