A method for predicting subject trustworthiness includes using at least one classifier to predict truthfulness of subject responses to prompts during a local or remote interview, based on subject responses and response times, as well as interviewer impressions and response times, and, in embodiments, also biometric measurements of the interviewer. Data from the subject interview is normalized and analyzed relative to an experience database previously created using data obtained from test subjects. Classifier prediction algorithms incorporate assumptions that subject response times are indicators of truthfulness, that subjects will tend to be consistently truthful or deceitful, and that conscious and subconscious impressions of the interviewer are predictive of subject trustworthiness. Data regarding interviewer impressions can be derived from interviewer response times, interviewer questionnaire answers, and/or interviewer biometric data. Appropriate actions based on trustworthiness predictions can include denial of security clearance or further investigation relevant to the subject.
Please help me write a proper abstract based on the patent claims. CLAIM: 1. A method for predicting the trustworthiness of an evaluation subject and taking an appropriate action based thereupon, the method comprising: during a preparation phase, establishing an interview schema, said interview schema comprising: a plurality of prompts to be provided to a subject by an interviewer during an interview; a plurality of possible responses receivable from the subject during the interview; definition of at least one response classifier operable by a computing device; and specification of a plurality of data elements to be obtained during the interview and provided to the at least one response classifier, said data elements being obtainable during the interview without requiring physical access to the subject; during a training phase: applying the schema during a training session to a plurality of test subjects, for whom a truthfulness or falsity of all responses is known; and applying by the computing device of machine learning to data elements obtained from the training session to develop an experience learning database; during an evaluation phase: applying the schema to the evaluation subject during an evaluation session; and deriving by the computing device from each response classifier a truthfulness prediction for each response received from the evaluation subject during the evaluation session according to data elements provided to the classifier from the evaluation session interview and from the experience learning database; and making a trustworthiness evaluation of the evaluation subject based on the truthfulness predictions of the response classifiers; and taking an appropriate action regarding the evaluation subject based on the trustworthiness evaluation. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the range of possible responses according to the schema is not limited to yes and no responses. 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one response classifier includes a Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) classifier. 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one response classifier includes a two state (honest and dishonest) Hidden Markov Model (HMM) classifier. 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of data elements to be obtained during the interview includes at least one reaction time of the interviewer. 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of data elements to be obtained during the interview includes at least one reaction time of the subject. 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of data elements to be obtained during the interview includes at least one trustworthiness impression obtained from the interviewer. 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the trustworthiness impression is obtained from at least one answer provided by the interviewer in response to a questionnaire. 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of data elements to be obtained during the interview according to the schema includes at least one measurement obtained from a biometric sensor applied to the interviewer. 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of data elements to be obtained during the interview includes at least one data element derived from a visual observation of the interviewer made during the interview. 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the evaluation subject is not included among the test subjects. 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the data elements to be obtained from the subject during the interview are limited to subject responses and subject response times. 13. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one of the data elements obtained during the evaluation session is used to enhance the experience learning database and thereby to improve truthfulness predictions for subsequent responses received during the evaluation session. 14. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one of the truthfulness predictions made during the evaluation session is used to enhance the experience learning database and thereby to improve truthfulness predictions for subsequent responses received during the evaluation session. 15. The method of claim 1, wherein: the schema includes a plurality of response classifiers; the truthfulness predictions of the response classifiers include confidence scores; one of the response classifiers is designated as the primary response classifier, the other response classifiers being designated as secondary response classifiers; and for each response obtained from the subject, the truthfulness predictions of the secondary response classifiers are considered only if the truthfulness prediction of the primary response classifier has a low confidence score for that response. 16. The method of claim 1, wherein the trustworthiness evaluation includes a score that falls within a range of possible scores. 17. The method of claim 16, wherein the method further comprises, if the score is below a specified threshold score: providing an opportunity to the subject to provide further responses; and revising the score according to the additional responses. 18. The method of claim 1, wherein the appropriate action includes denying a security clearance to the evaluation subject. 19. The method of claim 1, wherein the appropriate action includes denying employment to the evaluation subject, or terminating employment of the evaluation subject. 20. The method of claim 1, wherein the appropriate action includes consideration of the trustworthiness evaluation in making at least one of a judgement and an award in an adjudication proceeding. 21. The method of claim 1, wherein the appropriate action includes rejecting the subject from a group of candidates to be considered by a user of a dating service. 22. The method of claim 1, wherein the appropriate action includes initiating further investigation relevant to the evaluation subject. 23. A system for predicting the trustworthiness of an evaluation subject, the system comprising: non-transient media disclosing an interview schema, said interview schema including: a plurality of prompts to be provided to a subject by an interviewer during an interview; a plurality of possible responses receivable from the subject during the interview; and specification of a plurality of data elements to be obtained during the interview and provided to a computing device, said data elements being obtainable during the interview without requiring physical access to the subject; instructions recorded on non-transient media that is readable by the computing device and executable by the computing device so as to cause the computing device to: develop an experience learning database by applying machine learning to data elements obtained from a training session during which the schema is applied to a plurality of test subjects for whom a truthfulness or falsity of all responses is known; apply at least one response classifier to responses obtained from an evaluation session during which the schema is applied to the evaluation subject; derive from each response classifier a truthfulness prediction for each response received from the evaluation subject during the evaluation session according to data elements provided to the classifier from the evaluation session interview and from the experience learning database; make a trustworthiness evaluation of the evaluation subject based on the truthfulness predictions of the response classifiers; and provide the trustworthiness evaluation to a user. 24. The system of claim 23, further comprising a biometric monitoring apparatus applicable to the interviewer. 25. The system of claim 24, wherein the biometric monitoring apparatus is able to obtain at least one of an ECG, an EEG, an EOG, and a GSR.