An efficient fact checking system analyzes and determines the factual accuracy of information and/or characterizes the information by comparing the information with source information. The efficient fact checking system automatically monitors information, processes the information, fact checks the information efficiently and/or provides a status of the information.
Please help me write a proper abstract based on the patent claims. CLAIM: 1. A method programmed in a non-transitory memory of a device comprising: a. automatically fact checking target information by comparing the target information with source information to generate a result; and b. automatically presenting a status of the target information in real-time based on the result of the comparison of the target information with the source information, wherein comparing the target information with the source information begins searching the source information located on a fastest access time hardware device and continues to slower access time hardware devices. 2. The method of claim 1 wherein most popular, most recent and most common information is stored in the fastest access time hardware device, and less popular, less recent and less common information is stored in the slower access hardware devices. 3. The method of claim 1 wherein comparing the target information with the source information begins searching the source information located in a designated fact checking database and then goes to a broader set of source information. 4. The method of claim 1 wherein comparing the target information with the source information begins searching the source information classified by a plurality of keywords found in the target information, then using the source information classified by a single keyword found in the target information, and then using the source information classified by keywords related to the keywords found in the target information. 5. The method of claim 1 further comprising parsing the target information into segments and prioritizing the segments, so that a highest priority segment is fact checked first, wherein priority is based on the relatedness of the segment to a current topic being discussed and when the segment was presented, wherein if the segment is not fact checked before a timeout threshold, then the segment is removed from a fact check queue. 6. The method of claim 5 wherein a plurality of fact check queues are implemented, wherein a first fact check queue contains the segments to be fact checked in real-time, and the second fact check queue contains the segments to be fact checked in non-real-time. 7. The method of claim 1 further comprising parsing the target information into segments and prioritizing the segments, so that a highest priority segment is fact checked first, wherein priority is based on a presenter of the target information, wherein if the presenter of the target information has a validity rating below a first validity threshold, then the segments of the target information from the presenter are prioritized in a highest priority group, and if the presenter of the target information has the validity rating above the first threshold and below a second threshold, then the segments of the target information from the presenter are prioritized in a second highest priority group which has a lower priority than the highest priority group, and if the presenter of the target information has the validity rating above the second threshold, then the segments of the target information from the presenter are prioritized in a third highest priority group which has a lower priority than the second highest priority group. 8. The method of claim 1 further comprising parsing the target information into phrases, parsing the phrases into words, counting the number of words in each phrase, and comparing each phrase with the source information containing the same number of words as the number of words in the phrase being compared. 9. The method of claim 8 wherein the source information includes only source information in a classification matching a keyword detected in the target information. 10. The method of claim 1 further comprising parsing the target information into phrases, parsing the phrases into words, counting the number of words in each phrase, and comparing each phrase with the source information containing one more word than the number of words in the phrase being compared. 11. The method of claim 1 further comprising parsing the target information into segments, and only fact checking randomly selected segments. 12. The method of claim 1 further comprising utilizing a plurality of fact checking implementations initially, wherein each fact checking implementation utilizes a different set of source information, and comparing results of each fact checking implementation, and iteratively eliminating a fact checking implementation of the plurality of fact checking implementations with a lowest confidence score until a single fact checking implementation remains. 13. The method of claim 12 wherein utilizing the plurality of fact checking implementations initially occurs in the first minute of a video. 14. The method of claim 12 wherein the single fact checking implementation determined by eliminating other fact checking implementations is utilized for a specific type of content and is reused for future content that is the same type of content as the specific type of content. 15. The method of claim 12 wherein utilizing a plurality of fact checking implementations initially occurs in parallel while a previously determined best fact checking implementation is utilized for fact checking the target information. 16. The method of claim 1 further comprising utilizing a plurality of fact checking implementations initially, wherein each fact checking implementation utilizes a different set of source information, and comparing results of each fact checking implementation, and iteratively eliminating any fact checking implementations of the plurality of fact checking implementations with a confidence score below a threshold until two fact checking implementations remain and are used in a continuous, competitive fact checking implementation wherein the results of the two remaining fact checking implementations are compared to determine a final fact check result. 17. The method of claim 1 wherein comparing the target information with the source information begins searching the source information controlled by a media company, then using crowdsourced data as the source information, and then using world wide web data for fact checking. 18. The method of claim 1 further comprising analyzing a validity rating of the entity, wherein if the validity rating of the entity is below a threshold, then the source information is limited to sources with a rating above a reliability threshold. 19. A system comprising: a. a server device for fact checking target information by comparing the target information with source information to generate a result; and b. a client device for presenting a status of the target information in real-time based on the comparison of the target information with the source information, wherein comparing the target information with the source information begins searching the source information located on a fastest access time hardware device. 20. A device comprising: a. a non-transitory memory for storing an application for automatically performing the following steps: i. fact checking social networking information by comparing the social networking information with source information to generate a result; and ii. presenting a status of the social networking information in real-time based on the result of the comparison of the social networking information with the source information, wherein comparing the social networking information with the source information begins searching the source information located on a fastest access time hardware device; and b. a processor for processing the application.