In one embodiment, a committed information rate (CR) prediction is received from a machine learning model that corresponds to a predicted average traffic rate supported by a network connection. A traffic shaping strategy is adjusted based on the CR prediction. A rate at which data is communicated over the network connection may be based on the traffic shaping policy. The effects of the adjusted traffic shaping strategy are also monitored. Feedback is further provided to the machine learning model based on the monitored effects of the adjusted traffic shaping strategy.
Please help me write a proper abstract based on the patent claims. CLAIM: 1. A method, comprising: receiving, at a processor, a committed information rate (CIR) prediction from a machine learning model, wherein the CIR prediction corresponds to a predicted average traffic rate supported by a network connection; adjusting a traffic shaping strategy based on the CIR prediction, wherein a rate at which data is communicated over the network connection is based on the traffic shaping policy; monitoring effects of the adjusted traffic shaping strategy; and providing, by the processor, feedback to the machine learning model based on the monitored effects of the adjusted traffic shaping strategy. 2. The method as in claim 1, further comprising: detecting an increase in local queuing delays and, in response, sending a request for a new CIR prediction to the machine learning model. 3. The method as in claim 2, wherein the increase in local queuing delays is detected by transmitting probe packets along the network connection. 4. The method as in claim 1, further comprising: detecting an increase in dropped packets along the network connection and, in response, sending a request for a new CIR prediction to the machine learning model. 5. The method as in claim 4, further comprising: decreasing the rate at which data is communicated over the network connection until the new CIR prediction is received. 6. The method as in claim 1, further comprising: adjusting the traffic shaping strategy by increasing the rate at which data is communicated over the network connection. 7. The method as in claim 1, further comprising: adjusting the traffic shaping strategy by decreasing the rate at which data is communicated over the network connection. 8. The method as in claim 1, further comprising: providing the CIR prediction to a network management system. 9. The method as in claim 1, wherein the CIR prediction received from the machine learning model corresponds to a predicted average traffic rate for a specific destination. 10. An apparatus, comprising: one or more network interfaces to communicate with a network; a processor coupled to the network interfaces and adapted to execute one or more processes; and a memory configured to store a process executable by the processor, the process when executed operable to: receive a committed information rate (CIR) prediction from a machine learning model, wherein the CIR prediction corresponds to a predicted average traffic rate supported by a network connection; adjust a traffic shaping strategy based on the CIR prediction, wherein a rate at which data is communicated over the network connection is based on the traffic shaping policy; monitor effects of the adjusted traffic shaping strategy; and provide feedback to the machine learning model based on the monitored effects of the adjusted traffic shaping strategy. 11. The apparatus as in claim 10, wherein the process when executed is further operable to: detect an increase in local queuing delays and, in response, send a request for a new CIR prediction to the machine learning model. 12. The apparatus as in claim 11, wherein the increase in local queuing delays is detected by transmitting probe packets along the network connection. 13. The apparatus as in claim 10, wherein the process when executed is further operable to: detect an increase in dropped packets along the network connection and, in response, send a request for a new CIR prediction to the machine learning model. 14. The apparatus as in claim 10, wherein the process when executed is further operable to: adjust the traffic shaping strategy by increasing the rate at which data is communicated over the network connection. 15. The apparatus as in claim 10, wherein the process when executed is further operable to: adjust the traffic shaping strategy by decreasing the rate at which data is communicated over the network connection. 16. The apparatus as in claim 10, wherein the process when executed is further operable to: provide the CIR prediction to a network management system. 17. The apparatus as in claim 10, wherein the CIR prediction received from the machine learning model corresponds to a predicted average traffic rate for a specific destination. 18. A tangible, non-transitory, computer-readable media having software encoded thereon, the software when executed by a processor operable to: receive a committed information rate (CIR) prediction from a machine learning model, wherein the CIR prediction corresponds to a predicted average traffic rate supported by a network connection; adjust a traffic shaping strategy based on the CIR prediction, wherein a rate at which data is communicated over the network connection is based on the traffic shaping policy; monitor effects of the adjusted traffic shaping strategy; and provide feedback to the machine learning model based on the monitored effects of the adjusted traffic shaping strategy. 19. The computer-readable media as in claim 18, wherein the software when executed is further operable to: detect an increase in local queuing delays at the device and, in response, send a request for a new CIR prediction to the machine learning model. 20. The computer-readable media as in claim 18, wherein the software when executed is further operable to: detect an increase in dropped packets and, in response, send a request for a new CIR prediction to the machine learning model.