Methods, devices, systems, and non-transitory process-readable storage media for a computing device to use machine learning to dynamically configure an application and/or complex algorithms associated with the application. An aspect method performed by a processor of the computing device may include operations for performing an application that calls a library function associated with a complex algorithm, obtaining signals indicating user responses to performance of the application, determining whether a user tolerates the performance of the application based on the obtained signals indicating the user responses, adjusting a configuration of the application to improve a subsequent performance of the application in response to determining the user does not tolerate the performance of the application, and storing data indicating the user responses to the performance of the application and other external variables for use in subsequent evaluations of user inputs.
Please help me write a proper abstract based on the patent claims. CLAIM: 1. A method for dynamically configuring complex algorithms associated with applications executing on a computing device, comprising: performing, via a processor of the computing device, an application that calls a library function associated with a complex algorithm; obtaining, via the processor, signals indicating user responses to performance of the application; determining, via the processor, whether a user tolerates the performance of the application based on the obtained signals indicating the user responses; adjusting, via the processor, a configuration of the application to improve a subsequent performance of the application in response to determining the user does not tolerate the performance of the application; and storing, via the processor, data indicating the user responses to the performance of the application and other external variables for use in subsequent evaluations of user inputs. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the performance of the application includes at least one of an execution speed to achieve results, an accuracy of the results, and a precision of the results. 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising: adjusting, via the processor, the configuration of the library function to decrease the subsequent performance of the application in response to determining the user tolerates the performance of the application. 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the obtained signals indicating the user responses are one or more of touch inputs on a touch screen, button presses, data from sensors, a launch of another application, a change in a state of the application, and an absence of a user input when a user response would be expected. 5. The method of claim 1, wherein determining, via the processor, whether the user tolerates the performance of the application based on the obtained signals indicating the user responses comprises one or more of: determining, via the processor, whether the user has ignored output of the application based on the obtained signals; and determining, via the processor, whether the user has corrected the output of the application based on the obtained signals. 6. The method of claim 1, wherein determining, via the processor, whether the user tolerates the performance of the application based on the obtained signals indicating the user responses comprises one or more of: determining, via the processor, whether the user has navigated away from the application based on the obtained signals; and determining, via the processor, whether the user has pressed a refresh functionality or repeatedly pressed other buttons based on the obtained signals. 7. The method of claim 6, further comprising: determining, via the processor, whether the user has navigated back to the application in response to determining the user has navigated away from the application based on the obtained signals. 8. The method of claim 7, further comprising: determining, via the processor, whether the user has navigated back to the application within a predefined time threshold in response to determining the user has navigated back to the application. 9. The method of claim 1, wherein adjusting, via the processor, the configuration of the application to improve the subsequent performance of the application in response to determining the user does not tolerate the performance of the application comprises one or more of: increasing, via the processor, a precision setting; increasing, via the processor, an execution speed setting; and changing, via the processor, an execution core setting. 10. The method of claim 1, wherein adjusting, via the processor, the configuration of the application to improve the subsequent performance of the application in response to determining the user does not tolerate the performance of the application comprises adjusting, via the processor, the configuration of the application for using the library function in response to determining the user does not tolerate the performance of the application. 11. The method of claim 1, further comprising adjusting, via the processor, the configuration of the application to lower the subsequent performance of the application in response to determining the user tolerates the performance of the application. 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the application calls a plurality of library functions, wherein the library function is within the plurality of library functions, the method further comprising: selecting, via the processor, a first library function of the plurality of library functions; adjusting, via the processor, a configuration of the first library function to improve the subsequent performance of the application in response to determining the user does not tolerate the performance of the application based on the obtained signals indicating the user responses; subsequently performing, via the processor, the application; obtaining, via the processor, subsequent signals indicating subsequent user responses to the subsequent performance of the application; selecting, via the processor, a second library function of the plurality of library functions in response to determining the user does not tolerate the subsequent performance of the application; and adjusting, via the processor, a configuration of the second library function. 13. The method of claim 1, further comprising: obtaining, via the processor of the computing device, a plurality of trade-off settings for the application; evaluating, via the processor, conditions associated with the computing device at an initial time; and determining, via the processor, whether a trade-off setting of the obtained plurality of trade-off settings is to be utilized based on the evaluated conditions associated with the computing device at the initial time. 14. The method of claim 13, further comprising: adjusting, via the processor, an initial configuration of the application based on the trade-off setting in response to determining that the trade-off setting is to be utilized based on the evaluated conditions associated with the computing device at the initial time. 15. The method of claim 14, wherein adjusting, via the processor, the configuration of the application to improve the subsequent performance of the application in response to determining the user does not tolerate the performance of the application comprises overwriting, via the processor, the initial configuration of the application in response to determining that the user does not tolerate the performance of the application using the initial configuration. 16. The method of claim 13, wherein obtaining, via the processor of the computing device, the plurality of trade-off settings for the application comprises at least one of: obtaining, via the processor, a first trade-off settings for the application via an application programming interface (API) call during run-time of the application; obtaining, via the processor, a second trade-off settings for the application via an in-code directive; and obtaining, via the processor, a third trade-off settings for the application via a special register. 17. The method of claim 13, wherein evaluating, via the processor, conditions associated with the computing device at the initial time comprises at least one of: evaluating, by the processor, a workload for the application; and evaluating, by the processor, external conditions affecting processing of the application by the computing device. 18. A computing device, comprising a processor configured with processor-executable instructions to perform operations comprising: performing an application that calls a library function associated with a complex algorithm; obtaining signals indicating user responses to performance of the application; determining whether a user tolerates the performance of the application based on the obtained signals indicating the user responses; adjusting a configuration of the application to improve a subsequent performance of the application in response to determining the user does not tolerate the performance of the application; and storing data indicating the user responses to the performance of the application and other external variables for use in subsequent evaluations of user inputs. 19. The computing device of claim 18, wherein the processor is configured with processor-executable instructions to perform operations further comprising: adjusting the configuration of the library function to decrease the subsequent performance of the application in response to determining the user tolerates the performance of the application. 20. The computing device of claim 18, wherein the processor is configured with processor-executable instructions to perform operations such that determining whether the user tolerates the performance of the application based on the obtained signals indicating the user responses comprises one or more of: determining, via the processor, whether the user has ignored output of the application based on the obtained signals; and determining, via the processor, whether the user has corrected the output of the application based on the obtained signals. 21. The computing device of claim 18, wherein the processor is configured with processor-executable instructions to perform operations such that determining, via the processor, whether the user tolerates the performance of the application based on the obtained signals indicating the user responses comprises one or more of: determining whether the user has navigated away from the application based on the obtained signals; and determining whether the user has pressed a refresh functionality or repeatedly pressed other buttons based on the obtained signals. 22. The computing device of claim 21, wherein the processor is configured with processor-executable instructions to perform operations further comprising: determining whether the user has navigated back to the application in response to determining the user has navigated away from the application based on the obtained signals. 23. The computing device of claim 22, wherein the processor is configured with processor-executable instructions to perform operations further comprising: determining whether the user has navigated back to the application within a predefined time threshold in response to determining the user has navigated back to the application. 24. The computing device of claim 18, wherein the processor is configured with processor-executable instructions to perform operations such that adjusting the configuration of the application to improve the subsequent performance of the application in response to determining the user does not tolerate the performance of the application comprises one or more of: increasing a precision setting; increasing an execution speed setting; and changing an execution core setting. 25. The computing device of claim 18, wherein the processor is configured with processor-executable instructions to perform operations such that adjusting the configuration of the application to improve the subsequent performance of the application in response to determining the user does not tolerate the performance of the application comprises adjusting the configuration of the application for using the library function in response to determining the user does not tolerate the performance of the application. 26. The computing device of claim 18, wherein the processor is configured with processor-executable instructions to perform operations further comprising adjusting the configuration of the application to lower the subsequent performance of the application in response to determining that the user does tolerate the performance of the application. 27. The computing device of claim 18, wherein the processor is configured with processor-executable instructions to perform operations such that the application calls a plurality of library functions, wherein the library function is within the plurality of library functions, wherein the processor is configured with processor-executable instructions to perform operations further comprising: selecting a first library function of the plurality of library functions; adjusting a configuration of the first library function to improve the subsequent performance of the application in response to determining the user does not tolerate the performance of the application based on the obtained signals indicating the user responses; subsequently performing the application; obtaining subsequent signals indicating subsequent user responses to the subsequent performance of the application; selecting a second library function of the plurality of library functions in response to determining the user does not tolerate the subsequent performance of the application; and adjusting a configuration of the second library function. 28. The computing device of claim 18, wherein the processor is configured with processor-executable instructions to perform operations further comprising: obtaining a plurality of trade-off settings for the application; evaluating conditions associated with the computing device at an initial time; and determining whether a trade-off setting of the obtained plurality of trade-off settings is to be utilized based on the evaluated conditions associated with the computing device at the initial time. 29. A computing device, comprising: means for performing an application that calls a library function associated with a complex algorithm; means for obtaining signals indicating user responses to performance of the application; means for determining whether a user tolerates the performance of the application based on obtained signals indicating the user responses; means for adjusting a configuration of the application to improve a subsequent performance of the application in response to determining the user does not tolerate the performance of the application; and means for storing data indicating the user responses to the performance of the application and other external variables for use in subsequent evaluations of user inputs. 30. A non-transitory processor-readable storage medium having stored thereon processor-executable instructions configured to cause a processor of a computing device to perform operations comprising: performing an application that calls a library function associated with a complex algorithm; obtaining signals indicating user responses to performance of the application; determining whether a user tolerates the performance of the application based on the obtained signals indicating the user responses; adjusting a configuration of the application to improve a subsequent performance of the application in response to determining the user does not tolerate the performance of the application; and storing data indicating the user responses to the performance of the application and other external variables for use in subsequent evaluations of user inputs.