Discovery of causal models via experimentation is essential in numerous applications fields. One of the primary objectives of the invention is to minimize the use of costly experimental resources while achieving high discovery accuracy. The invention provides new methods and processes to enable accurate discovery of local causal pathways by integrating high-throughput observational data with efficient experimentation strategies. At the core of these methods are computational causal discovery techniques that account for multiplicity (i.e., indistinguishability) of causal pathways consistent with observational data. The invention, when applied for discovery of local causal pathways from a combination of observational and experimental data, achieves higher discovery accuracy than existing observational approaches and uses fewer experimental resources than existing experimental approaches. Repeated application of the invention for each variable in the modeled system produces the full causal model.
Please help me write a proper abstract based on the patent claims. CLAIM: 1. A computer-implemented method and system for optimizing experimental manipulations for discovery of local causal pathways comprising the following steps: 1) applying Generalized Local Learning or another sound method to a dataset to create from the analysis dataset, a list of variables V that are members of the local causal pathway of the response variable T; 2) if the response variable T can be experimentally manipulated, a. experimentally manipulating T and obtaining experimental data, in other words providing post-manipulation measurements of all variables in V; b. marking all variables in the set V that change in the experimental data due to manipulation of T as “direct effects” and marking remaining variables in V as “direct causes”; 3) if the response variable T cannot be experimentally manipulated, repeating the following for all variables X in the set V; a. experimentally manipulating X and obtaining experimental data; b. if T changes in the experimental data due to manipulation of X, marking X as a “direct cause” and if T does not change marking X as “direct effect”; and 4) outputting the local causal pathway of T by identifying the causal role of each variable as either having a direct effect or a direct cause in the pathway. 2. The computer-implemented method and system of claim 2, where instead of steps 2-3 all variables in the set V are experimentally manipulated and their causal roles are deciphered from the resulting experimental data, following the principle that if a variable X is changing in the experimental data obtained by manipulating Y, then X is an effect of Y and Y is a cause of X. 3. A computer-implemented method and system for optimizing experimental manipulations for discovery of local causal pathways comprising the following steps: 1) applying TIE*, iTIE* or another sound method to a dataset to create from the analysis dataset, a list of candidate local causal pathway members sets of a response variable T such that each member set is statistically indistinguishable from any of the other sets using only data; 2) creating a list of variables that consists of the union of all variables that participate in the above determined pathways and denoting this list by V; 3) forming a catalogue of variable lists with each list named an “equivalence cluster” from the variables in V such that each equivalence cluster contains variables that have the same information about T; 4) creating a list of effects of T by: a. experimentally manipulating T and obtaining experimental data; b. marking all variables in the set V that change in the experimental data due to manipulation of T as “effects”; 5) creating a list of direct causes of T by: a. repeating the following four sub-steps until there are no equivalence clusters with unmarked variables: i. if there is an equivalence cluster that contains a single unmarked variable X and all marked variables in this equivalence cluster (if any) are marked only as “passengers” and/or effects, then marking X as a “direct cause” and repeating this sub-step 5.a.i; ii. selecting an unmarked variable X from an equivalence cluster according to a user-provided prioritizing heuristic function or randomly; iii. experimentally manipulating X and obtaining experimental data; iv. if T does not change in the experimental data due to manipulation of X, then marking X as a “passenger” and marking all other non-effect variables that change in experimental data due to manipulation of X as “passengers” and, if T does change in the experimental data due to manipulation of X, marking X as a “cause”; b. marking every cause of X as a “direct cause” if there exist no other cause that changes due to manipulation of X; c. for every equivalence cluster that has a direct cause marking all other causes as “indirect causes”; 6) creating a list of direct effects of T by: a. repeating the following four sub-steps until all effect variables are either marked as “indirect effects” or have been manipulated; i. if there is an equivalence cluster that contains a single effect variable X, then marking X as a “direct effect” and repeating this sub-step 6.a.i; ii. selecting an effect variable X that has not been previously marked as “indirect effect”; iii. manipulating X and obtaining experimental data; iv. marking all effects that change in the experimental data due to manipulation of X and belong to the same equivalence cluster as “indirect effects”; b. marking as “direct effects” all effect variables that are not marked as “indirect effects”; and 7) outputting the local causal pathway of T by identifying the causal role of each variable as either having a direct effect or a direct cause in the pathway. 4. The computer-implemented method and system of claim 3 adapted for situations when T cannot be manipulated, where the method first identifies all causes of T and then identifies effects of T through knowledge gained by manipulation of its direct causes. 5. The computer-implemented method and system of claim 3, where instead of steps 4-6 all variables in the list V are manipulated and their causal roles are deciphered from the resulting experimental data, following the principle that if a variable X is changing in the experimental data obtained by manipulating Y, then X is an effect of Y and Y is a cause of X. 6. A computer-implemented method and system for optimizing experimental manipulations for discovery of local causal pathways comprising the following steps: 1) applying TIE*, iTIE* or another sound method to a dataset to create from the analysis dataset, a list of candidate local causal pathway members sets of a response variable T such that each member set is statistically indistinguishable from any of the other sets using only data; 2) creating a list of variables that consists of the union of all variables that participate in the above determined pathways and denoting this list by V; 3) performing experimental manipulation of selected variables in V and reconstruct the causal network around T using the LLC methods and variants run on the union of variables in V and T; and 4) outputting the local causal pathway of T by identifying the causal role of each variable as either having a direct effect, direct cause passenger, indirect effect, and indirect cause in the pathway. 7. The computer-implemented method and system of claim 6, where all variables in V are manipulated in step 3.