>What you have described is very clearly "not the same people" which was the standard you decided to create.  First, some of them are, and second, the same "People" as in a classification of people.  >SJWs have been complaining about the gender composition of corporate boards for years now. To the point that California passed a law saying that every board of a publicly traded company in California has to have a woman on it. That's entirely inconsistent with Marxists that would not want those boards to exist.  Yes, they pivoted to grievance studies as the next best avenue for attacking Western Civilization aka capitalism. They are useful idiots who would be openly Marxist if it were a viable declaration - and indeed some of them declare it anyways. If the boards are going to exist, they want women on them. And those women should, of course, be feminists. Because feminists will, of course, *operate the boards in a manner antithetical to the boards*. That's the goal.  >Trying to make everything Marxism in an attempt to discredit is the same as trying to make everything the alt-right in an attempt to discredit. It's the same as the SJW protocol to avoid actually dealing with positions and arguments and just go ad hominem.  There is clear academic lineage connecting Marxism to progressivism. You cannot say the same for all of the mutually exclusive groups that have been accused of membership in the alt-right. Probably because everyone who opposes Marxism  is "alt-right" to a leftist. You're engaging in retarded false equivalencies.