>Why would that even matter? Should the law only afford protection to 'the little guy' (i.e. people you like)? That said, it's worth noting that most of the pot shops are run by libtards who are finding that, oddly enough, most people would rather continue buying from their local dealer who doesn't seem to mind tax evasion any more than they minded selling illegal substances.  No, I was just saying in actual application of the law, a nationally-known entity with an easily looked up headquarters would be easier to go after than some small store that isn't breaking any local laws and is thus out of the jurisdiction of anyone that would care.  Though I supposed by that logic, these companies can be operating in areas where it's 100% legal and since there aren't any actual federal laws in place, anyone going after them would similarly be out of their jurisdiction, so the best they can do is go after consumers in 100% illegal areas.