> An individual had compiled evidence showing that white supremacists were planning a postering campaign on October 31st with flyers that said “It’s Okay to be White”.  That's a slanderous accusation from balding soyboy betacuck Geoff Sharpe towards /u/mybordersmychoice.   I hope he has some ***actual proof*** to back that up.   Because unlike some faggot virtue signaling on OnGuardForReee, an actual publication has some ethical and journalistic guidelines they need to adhere to when calling someone a racial supremacist...   >The post detailed how the campaign was coordinated by the alt-right subreddit /thedonald   How can the subreddit for the President of the United States of America be an *alternative*-right subreddit? They aren't an alternative when they're the status-quo...  >The campaign “Okay to be White” was nothing more than racist subterfuge, designed to fool the public into debating the message, rather than it’s origin or purpose.   So, instead of debating the merits of an idea, you want to  focus exclusively on who was making the argument? As in, "Fuck the free debate and exchange of ideas, where are all my Ad hominems at‽"  No wonder you can't have a productive or civil conversation with these people. Their preferred method of communication is literally logical fallacies.  You also need to be ***VERY*** careful when openly advocating for the examination of which demographics are pushing certain topics and why.   Especially over something as trivial as posters with an absolutely milquetoast statement everyone who isn't a racist can agree with.   Especially with the whole 'Patriarchy' narrative you've carefully constructed over the years.  Because it can lead to some incredibly dark places.  ___________  But then again, this is the fucking braindead retard who ***after*** calling people who don't hate themselves for their ethnicity "White Supremacists", still published an article entitled:  * ["CANADA’S CONSENSUS ON IMMIGRATION AND DIVERSITY IS AT A BREAKING POINT AND ***CONSERVATIVES ARE TO BLAME***"](https://thecable.co/canadas-consensus-on-immigration-and-diversity-is-at-a-breaking-point-and-conservatives-are-to-blame/)  Pretending that what is happening now was ever what we agreed to, or that opinions have changed while conditions remained static is fucking asinine.   Just look at this shit:   https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11-630-x/11-630-x2016006-eng.htm   His article also includes such wonderfully insightful gems of 'wisdom' as:  >Maxime Bernier launched a full-frontal assault on diversity, questioning the multicultural idea that has been a core Canadian value.  and  >Yet we now find that consensus on immigration, openness and diversity collapsing.   Gee, I sure do wonder why the 'consensus' is collapsing when you have Somalian immigrants telling Canadians that they're "Not Canadian", and just saying that we shouldn't be tearing down statues of our own first Prime Minister while we rename our national parks after a foreigner who initiated a civil war that lead to the deaths of millions to establish an Islamic state is considered a "full frontal assault on Canadian values".  Fucking retard.