Would you do me the honor of walking me through the chain of assumptions that led you into that statement? Because I get it, I obviously agree with you that it would suck to slide into state sponsored censorship. But I'd want to know how in THIS PARTICULAR CASE it would be useful FOR THE PEOPLE IN GAB to stake the defence of their continued existence on drawn child porn, even if I myself agree it should be protected speech.  Because I understand! I know it should ideally not even be an issue, but sadly the reality of the situation means you'd want to open a case for free speech on something with better optics. This isn't it, from where I see it. I would LOVE to hear opinions that elaborate on it, instead of this retarded talk point bullshit grandstanding that assumes I somehow want the jackboots on your doorsteps just because I see how INCREDIBLY HARD TO DEFEND loli porn would be as a pro free speech position.