> So then why would someone rape a real person if its so indistinguishable?  Just because it looks/appears indistinguishable doesn't mean it feels that way to the perpetrator.  They know it isn't real.  Escalation is an established part of sexual crimes.  Neither science nor law is able to currently draw a line between "healthy outlet" and "practice for the real thing" and sex robots only blur this line further.  > And there is already rape fantasy porn so who cares if it's not real?  Rape porn is illegal.  Yes, there are plenty of videos on the Internet but none of those are US Title 18 compliant so technically illegal. Sex robots, presumably, would be a the first legal "outlet" for rape fetishists.  > And I doubt they would make child sex robots so that point is irrelevant  Something isn't irrelevant just because you proclaim it so.  Why wouldn't they make rapeable child sex robots? Or toddlers? Or infants?  They are just "inanimate objects" to you.  Why do you think sex robots will be limited to only the fetishes that you personally support like rape?  > I feel that a potential rapist could get his fix on a robot instead of a real person so that could lead to less rape, not more  Again, escalation is how every pathological sexual behavior plays out.  Your ignorant opinions mean jack shit.  > And news flash most rapists rape because they can't get any, a problem sex robots will solve. so yea you are still the retarded fuck here.  Or they make it worse by letting them practice for the real thing.  It's clear you aren't capable of understanding basic reasoning so I'm done trying to explain things to a shit-for-brains incel.  I can only hope you decide to kill yourself before you drive a van into a crowd of people.