> But if you want to be a volatile jackass that's your business.  There is law to handle this. You "knowing" something is as irrelevant as the guy who slandered the company "knowing" something. He can spend his time proving it in court or deal with the repercussions of breaking a law should it be deemed he broke the law. But who cares about reality right? You have "feelings".  > judging by your comment history you're completely unhinged and detached from reality anyway, so I guess there isn't much point discussing this with you.  And you've determined this because I told you your "feelings" don't matter in relation to law? How level-headed of you. Thanks for taking your time to search outside of the thread and its material thus adding credence to the following statement: Nice retort/counter argument. You did good murdering my reputation by referencing my reddit history- now how can anyone ever believe what I wrote to be true?  Rest In Pieces