Firstly, stating what **the fact is** and what **the point is** and what **my opinion is** is fucking retarded.   > Wal-mart loses money on certain items, but at this point we're getting off topic.  Yes, your point about loss leaders makes no sense as Wal-mart *still profit* off this strategy overall. How do Stripe, PayPal, BoA etc. intend to profit from denying service to Gab?   Google are evil because they use Politifact and Snopes? Show me a more reliable source of information. I don't mean link all the times they've got it wrong. I mean show me ANYONE ELSE on the internet trying to research and offer up objective information on topical issues.  > The **fact** is: This cabal of tech companies has shown a willingness to work together against people.   **These events could also be interpreted as** a group of companies refusing to provide services to a platform hosting content they find objectionable.   Once again you are insisting Gab receive special protections because they host a minority viewpoint. If their platform is so unpopular people do not wish to do business with them, that is not censorship. No one is owed a place at the table.