This was also reflected in the paper - I will not comment on the content itself, which I think was sometimes misleading. But if no one gets about one out of about 25 students, there are about five for two and the rest for three and four, then something is wrong. When I talked about it with my accompanying teacher, I was told that "they are not smart, it is a weak class." Ok, it can be.
But if no one gets about one out of about 25 students, there are about five for two and the rest for three and four, then something is wrong.