I will punish him severely, or cut his throat, unless he bring a valid excuse."
“I will indeed punish him severely or slay him, or he must bring to me some clear evidence.”
Assuredly I will chastise him with a terrible chastisement, or I will slaughter him, or he bring me a clear authority.'
[If so,] I will punish him most severely or will kill him unless he bring me a convincing excuse!”
Surely I shall torment him with a severe torment, or I shall slaughter him, unless he bringeth unto me a warranty manifest.
"I will surely punish him with a severe torment, or slaughter him, unless he brings me a clear reason."
I will punish him most severely, or slay him, unless he gives me a valid excuse.”
I will inflict a severe punishment on him or maybe even slaughter him unless he comes forth with a convincing reason (for his absence)."
"I will surely punish him with a severe torment or slaughter him, unless he brings me a clear reason."
I verily will punish him with hard punishment or I verily will slay him, or he verily shall bring me a plain excuse.
‘I will punish him with a severe punishment, or I will behead him, unless he brings me a credible excuse.’
Surely, I will punish him with a terrible punishment, or I will slaughter him or he gives me a good reason'
I will surely punish him with a severe punishment or slaughter him unless he brings me clear authorization."
I shall certainly punish him severely or slaughter him unless he has a good reason for his absence."
I will most certainly punish him with a severe punishment, or kill him, or he shall bring to me a clear plea.
LaoAAa<u>thth</u>ibannahu AAa<u>tha</u>ban shadeedan aw laa<u>th</u>ba<u>h</u>annahu aw layatiyannee bisul<u>ta</u>nin mubeen<b>in</b>
I shall surely punish him severely or order him to be executed, unless he gives me a good reason for his absence."
"I will certainly punish him with a severe penalty, or execute him, unless he bring me a clear reason (for absence)."
لَأُعَذِّبَنَّهُۥ عَذَابًا شَدِيدًا أَوْ لَأَا۟ذْبَحَنَّهُۥٓ أَوْ لَيَأْتِيَنِّى بِسُلْطَٰنٍ مُّبِينٍ
He said when its absence became clear to him: “I shall punish it severely, or I shall slaughter it as a punishment for being absent, unless it brings a clear proof to prove its excuse for absence”.
He said when its absence became clear to him: “I shall punish it severely, or I shall slaughter it as a punishment for being absent, unless it brings a clear proof to prove its excuse for absence”.
<p>لَأُعَذِّبَنَّهُ عَذَابًا شَدِيدًا أَوْ لَأَذْبَحَنَّهُ</p><p>I will punish him with a severe punishment - 27:21</p><p>It is part of the political sagacity to punish the absentee after making due scrutiny.</p><p>It is permissible to punish a lethargic animal moderately</p><p>Allah Ta’ ala had permitted Sayyidna Sulaiman (علیہ السلام) to punish the animals in the same way, as He had permitted people of all ages, a permission which is still valid, to slaughter them to make use of their flesh, bones, skin etc. Similarly, if the domestic animals, such as cow, horse, camel, donkey etc., do not perform their normal duty, then it is permissible even now to punish them moderately for disciplining. Punishing animals, other than domestic, is not permissible under Islamic law. (Qurtubi)</p><p>أَوْ لَيَأْتِيَنِّي بِسُلْطَانٍ مُّبِينٍ</p><p>Unless he brings to me a clear plea. - 27:21</p><p>That is, if the hoopoe offers a plausible excuse for its absence, then it will be saved from the punishment. There is a subtle hint in it that it is expected of a ruler or an administrator that if someone falters doing something, then it should be thoroughly investigated before punishing him. The punishment should be enforced only when the guilt is established, otherwise he should be forgiven.</p>
لَأُعَذِّبَنَّهُ عَذَابًا شَدِيدًا أَوْ لَأَذْبَحَنَّهُI will punish him with a severe punishment - 27:21It is part of the political sagacity to punish the absentee after making due scrutiny.It is permissible to punish a lethargic animal moderatelyAllah Ta’ ala had permitted Sayyidna Sulaiman (علیہ السلام) to punish the animals in the same way, as He had permitted people of all ages, a permission which is still valid, to slaughter them to make use of their flesh, bones, skin etc. Similarly, if the domestic animals, such as cow, horse, camel, donkey etc., do not perform their normal duty, then it is permissible even now to punish them moderately for disciplining. Punishing animals, other than domestic, is not permissible under Islamic law. (Qurtubi)أَوْ لَيَأْتِيَنِّي بِسُلْطَانٍ مُّبِينٍUnless he brings to me a clear plea. - 27:21That is, if the hoopoe offers a plausible excuse for its absence, then it will be saved from the punishment. There is a subtle hint in it that it is expected of a ruler or an administrator that if someone falters doing something, then it should be thoroughly investigated before punishing him. The punishment should be enforced only when the guilt is established, otherwise he should be forgiven.