I THE NATIONAL REGISTER. MAR= 1, Ls challenged the House to say, whether there was any absence of ta lent on that side the House, and he was completely satisfii-d, that, single-Landed as they were without the talents, they were better than all the talents—(dnother laugh !)—He therefore did not agree to the motion, because it tended to discourage our allies, . and because, be m ver ily believed, that if the power of the Governentfell into the hands of those on the other side the House, the consequences would be most detrimental to the state of the nation. Mr. Wut Ta It EAD said he never had doubted the talents of the Right Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Perceval); indeed a man must he weak to doubt them. He was also ready to allow that lie (Mr. I'.) had stood single handed without any talents to support him. His friends near him had Wen accused of retusing their aid to the present Ministers, they could not agree with or cordially unite with them : but they had too much honour to betray them by pretended union. It had been said that the Catholic question was not in future to be treated as a Cabinet question. If it were not; if it were considered by the servants of the public as a question not worth their consideration, either for or against it, these persons were certainly guilty of a great dereliction of public duty. It had been said this question would in future be placed on the same foot ing as the Slave Trade was. It was well known, that the most power ful, the most eloquent Minister this Country ever had, exerted his elo quence, and his persuasions as an individual, for several years, to carry this question, but without effect; nor was it till it again became a Cabinet question, that the Slave Trade was carried. Mr. W. continued, would it have no effect in the Peninsula that the brother of the 'great Captain who had commanded with se much glory, and so much success, had retired from the Ministry, and was replaced by a Noble Lord, who, when before in office, had been proverbially unfortunate.—c Hear, liPar I ) Would the Catholics of Ireland forget the Noble Lord s con duct at the Union, who was now again going into the Cabinet, at the commencement of the new era, when the Catholics, who had indeed indulged in golden dreams, bad awoke to heart-rending disappointment? He could not suffer the House to go to a division without calling on that Noble Lord for some explanation on these subjects. Lord Cos ULrREAcn observed, the question of tip-night certainly was, to what set of men the Governinert should be entrusted. He would state what were his opinions; lie certainly had, previous to the late communications tee Lords Grenville and Grey, supposed it was proba ble these Noble Lords might have united with his Right Honourable j Fri( ud. They, however, it appeared, wished to break down the sys tem, and adopt a middle course; such a course could not be adopted, and they had been obliged to make a distinct declaration, and they had declared they could not, con 'intent with their political honour, treat with the present inisters. The Noble Lord then defended the period . of his Administration, and maintained that the hopes whit!' now ex isted of a favourable termination of the war in the Peninsula had been derived Irons our original success in Portugal; and even from the di version which the army of Sir John Moore made in Spain: With his decided views of the policy of the country, both internal and external, he should conceive himself a political coward, if he were to hesitate to take the responsibility of office, for fear of those atttacks which Gentle men on the other side might feel disposed to direct against him. Mr. TIERNEY, in a most able and energetic speech, supportett the Motion. Lord TEMPLE, in supporting the Motion, defended the conduct of Lords Grenville and Grey. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER in opposing the motion, de fended the 'conduct of Government, and strongly animadverted upon that of the Gentlemen on the other side. He observed, that the opi nions respecting the Claims of the Catholics still were what they had been when that Question was last before the House.—[But Oat es the pittimt of Government ttaw ? was asked across the Table; by Mr. Whit bread ?—What he had stated it to be on a former occasion, replied the i'llancellor.]—He still thought that the time had not arrived when tile claims could be listened to. With respect to the Honourable Ba ronet's Motion, he could not approve it. Mr. CANNING declared his intention to support the Motion, in collquence of the conduct of Government on the Catholic Question. He might now consider the door was shut for ever against the Catholic claims.—(Heor, liar, /ear!) Sir T. Tutct oN briefly replied. A division then took place, when the numbers were—For the Motion ; Against it, 209.—IVIajority against the Motion, 73. Adjourned at I fall past Three o'Clock. TUESIIII'S LONDO_V GAZETTE. BANKRUPTS. 135 Isaac Young, of New Sarum, W.its, victualler, to surrender Feb. 29, March 10, and Apnl 7, at ten, at Geildhall. London. Attorney, Mr. Davies, Lothbury, London. William White, of Sculcoates, York, auctioneer, March 3,6, and April 7, at ehtven, at the Neptune Inn, Kingston-upon-Hull. Attornies, Mr. G. Edmunds, Exchequer-Office of Pleas, Chancery-lane, London ; and Mr. G. Haire, Parliament-street, 111111. William Bosworth, of Liverpool, merchant, :March 11, 12, and April 7, at one, at the Globe Tavern, Live: pool. Attornies, Messrs. Bardswell and Stephenson, Liverpool; and Messrs. Blackstock aid Bunce, Temple, London. Robert Warrington, sen. of Coventry, wool-stapler, Match 9, 23, and April 7, at ten, at the Bromley's Arms, Ellaston, Stafford. Attor nies, Mr. J. Davenport, St urston, A shborne, Derby; and Mr. Ben!.ow, Stone-buildings, Lincoln's Inn, London. James Charles Brooker, late of Aldermat bury Church-yard, we cloth-factor, Feb. 29, March 7, and April 7, at eleven, at Attorney, Mr. Connect', Walbrook. Charles Say, of Newington-butts Surrey, haberdasher, F.-b. te - , March 7, and April 7, at ten, at Guildhall. Attorney, Mr. Hudson, Winkworth-place, City-road. James Wainwright, jun. of Wavertree, Lancaster, builder, March 11, 12, and April 7, at eleven, at the Globe Tavern, Liverpool. Ac tornies, Messrs. Cooper and Lowe, Southampton-buildings, Cliaecery lane, London; and Messrs. Orred and Liverpool. John Simonds, of Jermyn-street, Sr. James's, haberdasher. 1'03.29, March 7, and April 7, at one, at Guildhall. Attorney, Mr. Chambers,,. Furnival's Inn. Henry Kellewav, of Lon ham, Southampton, maitster, March 17, IP, and April 7, at eleven, at the King's Head Inn, Winiborne Mnister, Dorset. At - ornies, Mr. W. Dean, New lota, London ; and Mr. H. Rowden, Wimborne. George Salvidge, of Litton, Sonleelet, me !men March 4,5, and April 7, at twelve, at the Christopher Inn, Wells, Somerset. Atter:iies, Mr. R. Welsh, Well ; and Mr. Dyne, Lincoln's Inn-fields, Lyndon. FRIDAY, re 8.29. A writ of election for the Borough of Plympton was ordered, on the motion of Mr. Wil A tyro N, Lord Castlereagh having vacated his •:eat in the Iloti , e, as P,epresentative for that place, by accepting the Office of Principal Secretary of State for the War Department. The Drury-lane Theatre Amended Bill was read a third time and Waged. The Nottingham Watch and Ward Bill was read a second time, and was ordered to be read a third time on Monday, and engrossed. It is said that a proposition has been received from the French Co vminient, for th e exchange of prisoners, on a basis less ohjectionable than that before suggested from the same quarter. . CIATIFIc:ATES—M.tRcu 17. Richard Townroc, of Nottinglmin, er.—E('.Y.-. ..‘..u7er, of East bourne, Sussex. ruerchant.—John • mu., of NV,!st Smithficl.l, vic tualler.—Frederick Bryant, of Holborn, Lath, r-drt:cs;..r.—Wi.::•un Phil lips, of Wraghy, Lincoln, .t.ceper.—Edwatti N 1.5,., i•iey, of West moreland-place, Cir y-road, Arrowsioil . h, of '•;tokt.., Stafford, commun-brewer.—Gcorj;e Nlartlic.vs, of Hyti,e, hat John Holt, late of Leeds, York. butt:lit-T.— Hnnor, o: Pem berton, Lancaster, tanner.—\l' .f 21yrnouth-Duck, t.tilur. SATURDAY'S LONDON GAZETTE. BANKRUPTCY SUPERSEDED. John Wright, late of Walcot-place, Lambeth, merchant. I3.ANKRUPTS. Solomon Jacobs Barcerbur, Jacob Solonion Ilargetbur, Simnn Solomon Barg( rhur, Aaron Solomon Ban!erbur, Abranam Solomon Bargerbur; and Joseph Solomon Barg,:rlyar, of Burr-sweet, East Smithfield, ship-owi.ers, to surrender arch 7, at twelve, 14, at eleven, and Ajsril 1i , at one, at Guildhall. Attoruies, Messrs. 'vVillut and Alinesley, Finsbury-square. John Whit.lair, sen. of Ringwood, Southampton, carrier, March 25, at six, '2 6 , at eleven. and April 11, at six, at the Crown Inn, in Ring. wood, Souttiam; , too. Attornies, ir. Ralph Broome, of F.ingwoud, Southampton ; and 111es5rs. 13roonie and l'inniger, Gray's Innssquare, London. _ _ _ _ George Buchanan, of Liverpool, merchant, March 16, 17, aid April 11, at eleven, at the Gb.be Tavern, Liverpool. Attornies, Mrssis. Cooper and Lowe, Suutliamptn•buildi,Lgs, Chancery-lane, L9ndoli ; and Messrs. Orred and Baines, Liverpool. Thomas Field, of Statistead Abbotts, Hertford, lime-burner, March 3, 14, and April 11, at twelve, at London. Attorney, Air. Bond, Ware, Fkrts. Frederick IParker, of Congreve, Stafford, iron-master, March 3, ant: 6, at the Littleton's Arms, Penkridg., StifilTA, and April 11, .Lt LlQv, at the George Inn, Sti.ford. Attornies, Messrs. • Collins and K.. Stafford. _ _ 'William Joseph Coc, of Coddington, Nottingham, dealer, Mai ell 7. at eleven, and April 11, at three, at the Rutland's Air. , ..! Newark•npon- (rent, Nottingham►.• Atiornirs Nlessrs. R 035, Ross, New Boswell-court, Curly-street, London; and Mi Newark. _ _ _ William Dagnall, late of Liverpool, hardwareman, Marc:: PR ; and April 11, at eleven, at the Globt: •i''vern, ' James Phillips, Commerce-court, Lord-street, Liverpool: ant -Windle, Bedford-row, London. George Kemp, of Great Pulteney•street, tay! March 7, 14, and April 11, :It one, at Guildhall. _Atomic ;, Messra. Cardales sud Young, Grays inn. Robert %Voters, or Queen-street, Bloomsbury, painter, Match 7, : i •