ME' NATIONAL REGISTER. The Madras Papers a:million that royar salutes were fired on tl 46th of June tiom the fort and Chepank palace, in !minim of the success of the Beitish arms, under Majos Cetterll Ochter!o , y, and . f the cession of the province of Klima , on to the Be itisli authority. On the 4th of July the whole of His Majesty's ships in Ma dras Wads, had, with the exception of the Minden, sailed foe their several destinations The Ceres, which sailed from Calcutta so long back as the 17th of April, and for whose fety a•prelieral ms were entertained, arrived in the Roads all we Nit n lay the King of Candy's throne and sceptic were re move d fr m Lord liathlost's office, in Downing•stteet, to Carlton Iwuse, they having hren sent to England as a pre sent to the Prince Regent. The trophies of war taken at the battle of Waterloo, were removed from the same office to the Towe.. Their Imperial Highnesses the Ai chdukes John and Lewis. brothers to the Emperor of Austria, with their suite, arrived at Leicester on Monday last; on Tuesday morning they vi sited the manufactory of Messrs. Kelly, of that place, and spent some time in inspecting the machinery ; they after wards proceeded on their way to Beau Desart, the seat of the Marquis of A liglesea. Lord C chrane, it is understood, is determined riot to per mit the a fra;r of hoax upon the Stock Exchange to sleep. ii s uncle, Mr Basil Cochrane, is aiding his LordAiip at the present moment. in collecting evidence to prove the inno cence of Lord Cochrane in the transaction, and the guilt of .De Berenger and others. The folio. , in;; is given as a recipe for preparing ginger beer of a sunenor quality :—Powder of ginger I oz, cream of tartar half an oz., a large lemon sliced ; 21b. of lump sugar, and one gallon of water, added together and simmered over the fire for half an hour, and fermented in the usual way, with a table spoonful of yeast, and bottle it close for use. It may be proper to observe, that it should be put in such bottles as are used for soda -water, anddclosely cotked. LA IV INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, Nov. 6. Michaelmas Term commenced this d.iy. The usual returns made to the Court regarding the state of the convicts ; were read. TUESDAY, NOV. 7. MR. PEEL AND MR. O'CONNELL. THE KING V. &CONNELL, ESQ. Mr. Reader made the following motion on behalf of the defendant, ho was bound over personally to appear on the first day of this term, in consequence of the security he was called upon to give for keeping the pe*ce generally towards the pHbllr, but particularly towards the Right Hon. Robert Peel, Esq.—" My Lords, I am in structed on the part of O'Connell, to discharge his recogni zanr•es upon an affidavit, which states-- Lord Eletiborontyli-..—" To discharge his recognizance ! That is TRtfler too 111101. Yo'i may move to respite his recognizances if you please—that is another question." Mr. Reader--" That will certainly answer this gentleman's pur pose guile a• .4 ell. Mr. O'Connell is a gentleman in the profession at the Irish Bar; and in consequence of his extensive practice in that country, Itte amid not, witho u t great inconvenience, give his personal attendance in 'Conn before your Lordships during the pre split term. He is hound by his recognizance' personally to attend in open Court on the firit day of the term." Lord Ellilltiorougit—" Have you any affidavit which Oates that IIA• done nothing in contraVelititill Of the object for which he was required lo give security ?" Krailer-- 4 ‘ Certainly, my Lord. I have an affidavit which ft,ll states that he has kept the peace toward , his MAjesty's subjects generally. but towards ihe Right Honourable Robert Peel partial lai ly ; that he k DOW in Ireland ; that he has complied with the re cognizance ; that he did not quit the realm of England for the pur pose of avoiding the smithy entered into; but has merely returned In Ireland, %%here he resides. I humbly move your Lordships, under these circumstances, that hia recognizance' may be rerpited till next term." The Court remained in consultation for a few minutest. LI rd Elles►boro'igl► -- •. We were thinking of giving you a (*water respite than that. But in doing so, we ninyit uot be considered as tying, up the ha►►d• of the Conrt, in case the object of the recogni• ma►►ce* should, in the mean time, be defeated. It is to be perfectly understood. that ►f there +hould he any thing done in contravention of these reeognizanees (though by the respite which we now grant we cannot proceed upon the prPrettt recognizances). we can pro ceed in case there should be any fresh net of delinquency. 13►tt the Court waves the personal appearance of Mr. O'Connell, upon these rerogniz .atces, until the first day of Easter Term, until which day his recognizance. do accordingly stand respited." r• i. SATURDAY. A entionis case of settlement came on to be argued before the Court, mina) an Appeal from the Quarter Sessions. The pauper whose settlement was the subject of discussion was a soldier, and had deserted, and under these circumstances went to his wife for concealment, who hired the tenement, from the neertpation of which the pauper now claimed a settlement. The husband was concealed in the home for seven weeks, but was not known to the landlord, or to any other person in the place, except his own family. This crettpation, Mr. Scarlet contended, however, gave the pauper a !•ettlenient, even allowing that he was not known at all to the land. lord. His witehired the house as his agent, and he submitted, that the parish officers could not have removed him, and would have been bound to relieve him after the forty days were expired, had he required it. The Court, however, held, that this was no settlement for the pauper. The wife did not take the tenement as the agent of her husband, but as a single woman, it not being known that he was in existence. This could not be called a settlement. The husband, who had only perched there as a resting place in his flight from the performance of those duties he owed to his Sovereign, had he dared to have ventured forth from his hiding place, it is probable, if the parish officers had not removed him, the serjeanta of the regiment would have done so, and that very quickly. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, WESTSSINSTER, No ifirrcirAm COMMON. Cltmuzit V. PENNINGToN. Mr. Sergeant lest moved for rule to spew cause why there not be a new blot in this case, on the ground that it was a against evidence. It was an action under the General Inc Act, to ascertain the boundary of the parishes of Beddingh ---, in the county of Surrey. There were two issues, first was to ascertain whether the boundary set out by the Commis sioners WWI light ; the second was to prove the boundary so-set out was not right, and that it ought to be shorter. . The first boundar took about three hundred acres from Mitcham Common. The found for the Commissioners' line. The great support of his was au objettion to the sort of evidence on which the verdict st it'd. Evidence was received which ought not to have been eived. The C mmissioners produced depositions taken in eery suit. in which Sir Nicholas Carey was plemtiff, and Tillotson Dean of Canterbury, defendant Doctor Tithition at the same time in Canterbury, and on that account his e\ could not apply to the dispute at Mitcham.—There Weie parish of Mitcham, the manors of Mitcham, Biplane, and worth, Foshan, and Ravenbury. The plaintiff, Sir Nicholas' was Lord of the Manor of Ravenbury;. Doctor Tillotson, was of the Manor of Poxbal/. The depositions of these persons, arose out of a bill filed in 168*, were not applicable to the between the plaintiff and the defendants, and inadmissible, because the original bill out of which the depositions arose could not domed. The Court expressed an opinion, that it bad been customary receive such evidence. Mr. Sergeant Best then observed, that this case was of considers. husband, from the he dared ,le, it the regiment ;ov. 8. re should verdict inclosure igton and a lies; the Commis- a o-set out mundary The Jury k mot ion ict could been re- a Chao- Doctor son lived fc evidence to le in the ind Tam- EC is Carey, hi vas Lord ar which an e dispute di , beesose Sil t be pro• yo ornery to eft Er Madera. col NOlmom iiMIMII ~~ .~~Vi NOV. 12. 754