.. 11 aro fond of riding, shooting, and walking, and you, my dear, wonld tint be disposed to ratable through ditches, hedges, and over gates. When you and I join in the disci, • Toge ther let tie range the fields,' let me recounitend ,loomfcld. u r sp a l e .hi s ," The letters, said air. Pearson, are all in the same stile of familia' ty. Another passage was— " Now, 111.111 k 01 . 11, 1 left ley silk umbrella in the back parlour. There is no reason why you should use it, 114 you have one of your own." The last letter woe doted Nov. 17, 1820: " I host this letter will find you better. lam not sur prised your journey to has had ill effects; besides, your situation made it more than likely. Receive say best wishes for your welfare." The gemlenien 'emitted to Brampton, and resided with her till °ember. No change had then been observed in his conduct. She expected his return one morning, and found he did not conic that day or the next. At last the gentleman's elder brother caute, and said his brother had told him the time lutist c when their intercourse must cease, aua the sooner it iteppetted the better. The gen tlemen 100 r had lived with had promised to settle an annuity of 1001. upon her in case of separation, but the brothel g.ts e 111'11001. to pay off servants and break tip the establishment. After she had paid the debts, she had little left. she was taken ill; the goods of the person ale lodged as ill were di...trained fur rent, 41111 the little pro perty she had tentaining was swept away. Unable to live to Eueland, she resolved to go to Dublin. Iler friend, Mary Atom Evens, wits the partner of her journey. When they ClllllO 10 Liverpool she was again taken ill, and she wrote a letter to the gentleman, stating her money was gone. Site received nu RIISISCI'S end on her way back to London I esolved to call oil him. On Thursday, the elth of October, she remained at an inn where the coaches stopped, and there resolved to apply to her former pro tector. Mt. Denison (disci vet! at this part of his state ment, that lie was tint afraid of the charge of immorality, if he asserted that this youtig woman had some claim to the compassion of the ;meson with whom she had lived three years. Sloe wrote a letter, and requested Uisa Evans to carry it. Miss Evans met the gentleman to whom it was directed, and offered to deliver it. lie said 11e knew from where a t ante, and refused to rereive it. They both cot Hest day to the house, and sent the letter by a little boy, whoa they met on the toad. The letter was refused by the servant. Soon after the gentleman's valet came out, and ,t,istel the boy if these were lite women who sent the letter ? Ile said yes, The valet then declared that Iris master did not knew them, and, if they did not carry themselves off, he would semi for a person who would make them. Mrs. Carey thonglit it right to apply to the gentleman in person, and met him on horseback. She attempted to speak to him, lint lie rode past her. She waited till his return, then went to the door. The valet sail his master did not know her, but he would send for a person to take eau eof tier. A constable then made Isis appearance. lie was a butcher in the town. Ile said these women wet v his prisoners, and it they resisted he had something for these, producing two pails lilliandeutls. 'lke butcher took thent away, and tritest . ..lml theist to a matt with a cart, who conveyed them to Ilisket's cottage, a place where pullets were confeleil pi evions to exami natiou before the magistrate. There was only one bed in the house, which was occupied by Baker and Lis wile. They were left all night withant the means of sleeping, anti wit hou t refreshment. The next day a termer of the name of Tranchard became answereble for their appear mice, and they were permitted to go to the into. Oat them way there they met the valet, alto asked what business they hail at large—they were his master's prisoners. Be tween nine atm ten o'clock the same night they were sent again to the cottage of Baker, and next day mete told that they must go befiire the magistt ate. Between three and four o'clock they yawe removed to his house by the constable, and for the 11141 time the magis trate made his appearance. The first question we-•—Are they both prisoners? The constable said, both 11411 been kept prisoners, but only one was the prisoner. Mrs. Carey was taken apart for examination, tend asked if she hail nut been begging/ She said, no. Tilt magistrate 111(41 said, be was idiot used of her collar:ion. lie had Seel' Ille Zell Beltran, Mho said he d; I not know her.— Here, said Air. • Pearson, the mall who had crossed the A•lantic to seduce this young autmtn pretesids lie does not know tier. Jhr odireed all his epistolary comaspondenee, and said, Y.,' must be acquainted nitli the liand.writing of your friend, but if you are not, take the letters and ask him the ques tion. 'lll- magistrate took the letters. and said I.e shoold relitin south As I.e went out he said something to the constable. When he was gone the constable amid, 1 will give yon tt. it you will leave this country, and not trouble the gentleman any snore. She refused.. When the gi.triste teturoed lie said, Are you rontapt to take the 21.? Her answer Was, No. He replied, Very well; I cannot finish the ea • :Ohm now, fur (hailer is ready—let her lie brought to me to-morrow. She was takeifeway to the cottage of Baker, and slehrhnell all alight. They were cowered in a cart next nwruitig to the magistrate, who asked her abeam, she Ronk) be con :::: itied fur Imo or !mid labour. They both said fur Ishii. He told them it should he for hold labour, and if they did not labour they al 'd be whipped. The commitment was mode yea, n od they were taken to prison. This young woman, who had list) three years with this gentleman, was iwoilied by his valet inn state of sickness, and carried in a cart to the common ?loose of Correction. They wave mitomitted un the 15th f Oc:uber, and on the 6th of September the magistrate came rnd ordered their release. On that day the Grand .Jury were aiming the prison, and it was nut unreasonable to suppose, said Mr. Pearson, the Giant] Jury would hate ordered her dis charge. lie contended that the whole trans-A:nen was illegal' on the part of die inaiiistrate. Mr. Justice Best.—Does your clirstlavit state that the magistrate was Wiling with this Lentlmmo 4t the time the exauunation was djourned P . . Mr. Pidirson.—The magistrate stated. that ha had an interview with this gentleman preceding Cie extuninaticm and that tile gentleman said he did not know her.. Judge lisyley.—The difficulty we have is in seeing whether these ha prima facie case against this gentleman. Pearson.—lle says, when the letter is banded to him by Miss Evans. ". Oh! I kllOl, who it conies tromp and I will nut receive it." Mr..tUrtice Bay ley.—That is tnough : you have also enough to teach the valet and constable, but you fail with rc-pect to the fifth person, who receiv..ll them at the cottage; Take your rule against four. Mr. Persson acterdingly tank his rule to shew cause why a rtinnual information should not be tiled against the tour persons before dewril,ed. _ _ .... Judge iSayley nuked if the notice had been given to the n:agii crew ? THE NATIONAL " REGISTER lied • r- Mr. Pearson said no; but bi notate; -.,.--.40 he had instructed a professional person to act for him. THE ILING V. RICHARD DLACOM, CLERIC. Mr. Brougham moved the judgment of the Court on the defendant. found guilty on a gross libd on her late Majesty ; but in comequence of tut: absence of die Lord Chief Justice, who sut at Nita Prius, Guildhall. and the necoi.ity tot the attendant* of Mr. Justice Holroyd at Chambers, judgment was postponed. , . - THIJK,DA Y. ROY. :2. [nor AT CIIELTENII AM. TII6 ZING a. THOMAS GREGORY ND EIGHT OTHERS.' The defendants upiteared to rreetve 'judgment. found guilty of a riot and 111.441111 upon two office's of EiChe, ul Chettealtatn, ou the fist of January lust. It appeared fr be mites of the Lord Chief Justice, that two officers of the Earise, named Gladwin and Dogood, made a seizure of several painted winnow blinds in the shop of Francis Rawli ~,, un upholsterer. The seizure was made on the ground that the articles were liable to a duty that had not been p.sid Other seizures of the same description were made at the shop of Thomas Boucher. This circuin srsoce occasioned considerable opposition, which increased its a riot. The officers were pelted with stones, and compelled to seek refuge in the house of Mr. Lucie, of Cheltonhatn, and that of a German In the same town. The snob followed them and commenced ato attack on the houses where the officers bud retreated, throwin.; strums, firing pistols, mud threatening to murder the officers if they could get theta out. The defen• darts, who took an active part in tile riot, were much in censed against informers, and they appeared to act nnder a belief ilra the articles seized were not liable to duty. The Jury found T. Gregory, E. Call, Timmins Boucher, D. Amu• cher. F. Miss lists, Woe. Rawlins, D. Alder, J. Alder, Wm. Peill'bey, and George Turk, guilty. E. Call did not appear on this Oteni;1111. The utiiiLvits of Gregosy, TllOll. Boucher, and Daniel Boucher, and the other defendants were read. They de clared t heir total ignorance of the liability of painted blind, to be seised. Several respectable persons gave the defendants the cha mart er of fair and holiest tradesmen, peaceable and loyal aultiects. Mr. Pullen addressed the Court ns counsel fur the tw brothers maned Alder. Those two individuals hod hithert borne the mo,t eact Heat chancier. They did not appear to have tale., an active part in tins disturbance. They were not aware of what they were doing, and he trawled their former good conduct would plead in mitigation of punish ment. _ . . _ Mr. Tw igs expressed a hope that the Court would make a lenieut distinction with respect to this riot. It was not one of an aggravated character. John Alder and Thomas Gregory, were perhaps persons who had pecutiat claims to the mercy of the Court. Their general character was good; he therefore entreated for them all the mitigation the Court could deal out. - - - -- • Mr. Ludlow appeared for George Turk and Wm. Peachy; (ho defendant., he said ,were nut implicated in the origin of I hi. riot. Mr. Campbell, as Counsel for the Rantins, said although Ihe olficeis seized the is indow blinds, the son, 11 illiam Rawlins offered mil resistance, but suffered the officers to take them away, The Lord Chief Justice said, Win. Rawlins was heard to say, il—n them—pull them out—murder thou.—With regard that his property had heed seised, under circua. , tances of hardship. These blinds had been exposed three months without the least suspicion that they were subject to duly. Mr. Cruse, in behalf of the Bouchers, rein estated his cli ents to be young s trailesmeu who had suffered much by the loss of the articles seized. . . . The Solicitor General in aggravation, staled that the ex cise officers on this occasion acted with the minuet propriety. They were doing no more than their duty. With respect to the situation in life of the defendants, their respectability might have led them to more correct conduct. Mr. Justice Bailey sentenced Thomas Gregory to be ha. prisoued one year in the house of correction, at North Leach; Thomas Boucher, Daniel Boucher, William Rawlins. and Francis Rawlins, to be imprisoned one year in the same house of correction, and to find sureties, themselves iii 2001. and two others in MI. each. Francis Rawlins um also Fentenced to pay a line of bOl. Daniel Alder and William l'enchey were sentenced to he imprisoned four months in the same house. Joint A!der was old, red to pay a fine of 251. and he imprisoned si ill, George Turk, in the same house, six ths, and at the expiration of that timeliud sureties. FKIDAY, NOT. 23. Tilt: KING D. l REDEUICIII GCRALD. The Solicitor Gene - rill m oved fur the judgment of the Court upon the dc fendaut, an eseise-•dlicer, who had pleaded guilty, in a prosecution for a curispiri.cy to defraud the King, by lint accounting for certain ditties received fur 43 down Iv! -L ins of parchment, manufactured by Mr. Bennett, and Win. Kit by, at Bermondsey. The defendant was sentenced to six mouths tmp isonment iu lbws? 1111 l liger-lane gaol. ryit: KING V. G. MGRS. The slefentlnsit, Iv sin was 611011111$111 to Carlile, appeared it, receive the judgment of the Court, found guilty of publialsiog certain weld ilea MIA 1)1451111C111011S IJ , • H. Cooper put iu affidav its fur the defendant. The first was made by Jane Carlile, who deposed that niter she inform; was Sled, she went to ill. Ntsaile, soacitor for the pro:A.(IIH .. and made every possible concession on the purl or the defendant, end proposed dischar,4ing ban faun her Pervice, iu case the proccedilLs were stayed. Richard Carafe, its another niffilev it, deposed that the defendant had been iii his service sum e deponent took him from his parents in the country, a len, and lie never supposed the law officers of the crow n would proceed against the defelidaiii, while the proplielor of the shop and author ist the sibyl remained unnoticed by the prosecutors. The dei 00000 ent further stated, that lie believed the religious prin ciples of the defendalit to he differeut from his ;ow is. He had, however, never made any enquiry respecting those prin ciples—all he expected frum the defendant us a servant wag honesty and integrity. Several other affidavits gave the defendant the character of a qeudy moral ) ming man, constant in his attendance at church. Mr. Cooper, as counsel for the defendant, addrss , ed t he Court iii mitigation of the seem ity of puuislament. llsi ad verted In the affidavits which had been read, and expressed sena ixe that the Sulicittor.fieueral had litouglit the defi.ll. daub up for judgment. He could only accouid tin' the 'entrance of the defendant nu the Saar of the Court, by eon• eluding that the Solicitor General was under the controul of no officer of the crown lifglicr than himself. The derelldallt Sh11)41 before the Court, not twenty years of age, and cer tainly *lder circialetances whim never attended a perssits bruukht up fur judgment. l'he defendant was merely ass r tram in this shop, without any interest iu the publication, notwithstanding n hich, he was to be 'vanished, while the person who avowed himself the publisher of the libel wa, f • 1'... • ••• 371 - nut itruseetiled. Tiiiv was nut ill iiii ISOII wills the generous feeling of mankind. There taus a noble seal intent and spirit in this ronrtry, w tholdined to sulk- ll,c servile Ofer.u. mem, n lulst the head and thaitagil of tile nliroce was Tot nerahle. Iu a ruse like this the Com ens obliged, by it !Willie of slyly, to pus a knit nt jailyitimit. Ile made this as sertion span the it Ise ntaxiin lan - Sound in tbe comment n ries of Mr. Justice fl soomite. NII. Cooper then cited she following passage :—" Nett to doing right, the i.reut objet t in the nand ii itt ration of justice is w give public satisfoc. ," There email 1* no sastisfuttion in • •"ere Poni" 1 " Meld upon a servant Owed in the situation of the cletearlishi, It was iinisosidsle the clown could sanction such a pi 41beell !init. " I wish," said Mr. Cooper, " . K.sigs had that super. uinuuhtnte of intisrmatiun they a e su,,po,ed to posse ss wish the King of England could sit alt Ili it passes in his dm. ssoultisatf'say Kings are more than amen, neither would I allow Mena to he The K tog a I.IIOM n to be a man of feeling nod n gentleman, and hail he Loon u a ser vant erns piiisccuied for the crime of his master he *mild have slopped it. I liaise a rOst to presume she defendant had no hiiistrb of this publication ; as proof of knows. ledge of the etelleills of thy public:Amu nas uttered fit the trial."—Mr. Gospel then cuuieinl ii that these never bad been such si its 11,1, before the Court. If it wife oat excused in the iyie of lan its being under Ilse (minion' of lie' 1111611:11111, surd), a bel Vaal, a Ito ri..s under stron4er con (rood, was also eticu,alile. The di femlaill wits prostiate before the Court, but sir had 611 , 111 x hie ins so a lila Nil sen tence. Greta and enlightened nations had mode Mos to ea• cuse crimes urged by the sosirviiit (mutation of the perpetra. tors, stud in Ilias case it Was &Jai 1011 marls to ask the Court to consider this young man us it Itel'etBll depending solely on his employment for Mead. Tue %%00.1 w .s w atuug fur the the severe jUdgiatilf of t lie Court le t ouaigil the di ft itilaat to infamy said ruin. The teamed counsel laid one other point to bring before the Court. It mould peon'''. he urged Mat the defendant, by pleading Not Guilty, hod aAgrionted _tarot. °fence, but he tainted she Court would put a lieure I i Must rue lion fill Ilia( CireUllillailee. It load been said on many uerasiuus, that a plea of guilty list not lessen •ii fence, and persons unlit r accusation had been frrimmiiil) re commended to withdraw their admission of guilt, and depend upon a fair trial. lie concluded by deprecating ally heavy punishment upon Isis i tieut, iu consequence of his age, his necessities, and character. The Sohcitor-Gencral spoke at eonsidelable length in aggravnii ~,, „ ron,idering it is case deserving of exemplary punishment, and that he ehuuld have been gui;ty of a gross dereliction of his daily if lie had not called the defendant for judgment ; and it was for the purpose of putting down the intolerable nuitunt e of Carlile's 'publications that had Auided -him in the ',error ttttt nee of his duty. Tao Court, after some consideration, pronounced by Mr, Justice Hityle)—Phut the defendant be imprisoned in the gaol of Winchester for six month., and give ►ecurity for good" behaviour. himself iii 5001. and twit others in 1001. each, for Mellen years. TUC LUNG U. 1111.11AEL MARNE.. _ The defendant had pleaded guilt; to nn inforenntien charring him with offering a bribe of 121. to a perwto named Fredivii, that he aught tiedegard 4is dut ,and enable the de. feadant to land goo d s. The defendant, in Isis afli das it, alleged Ilidt he was induced to otter the money at the idiv.e,tion of n permit) named I) is idson. lle as sentenced to he iinprboned Caw suoutlit ui Hor>luun gaol, and to pay ts of /11. THE SINAI V. T. OLUVIELD. The defendant was round guilts of snaking s signal t to keep off a smuggling vessel. In cons , quenee of an affi davit, stating that lie had ready' ed great sea vice to the eXel,e and personsin danger of shipn reek, by adventuring in bis bout—be was di , charged on ha own recognizance. TUB BING B. T. BARTLETT. The defendant nil- found guilty of an assault on a ' , ellen named Wallace, on Alargate Vier. It appeared that the de. fendant struck the man a ' , Udell, Mom, a latch broke his no..e. They fell, and the defendant au, f.usual wish open clay knife. The object of his uttac•k a'a an otheer of the en,- toms, and it was supposed inlenco aas uff...i ti on tlr•.tt (Kt.:neon. Tale deteudent was ordered to he ini t irislined one year in the prima, of St. Auru•tine, near Canterbury. TIIC MING o. ISAAC COSC. - The defendant, nit the motion nl Se rgratit Pell, appeared to receive juil;inent for a libel reflect nu the cluiructer of Col. Neratan, it stud 11l at the militm coil: ge, Snudisurst.— Tile libel ate: I)ll4;i:died in the Excler Post. II al luded to the pr .s.entoo, and i h aged him aoh the grunti it barbarity iiilumtirg hit mut e, at the stabs of the rut k ilotel, ti!Jitiouth. t was dew; tied to he a wanton delitie rate act of crui ity, putting a useful annual to tortui e cur 1!;e mere gratificatiOn of a cruel disposition. The indictiner t was tried at Exeter, and the Jury attic left to say wit. ther the statement tills a true net uunt of a hat did ewe They ileatived the preposition by finding the delemb.;,t Mr. Co se, who is an attorney, put in a sery long aflidas it, in which he gave the examiontiun ta!uen tit itint.‘elf MO per sons in the town of Sirlinouth, a hn acre supposed lo be 4e.e iitors of the disgusting 'Hitcher" , of the animal. The stnte inent by those persims aas not on oath, but it male ut Itee substance of the uileaeil libel. The defendant also slat •rt that sevcial inhabitants of Sidinouth had consulteu him no the means of preferring a criminal pne‘et.it mos itg:...bma Al:. lll.tratiaol, for rruelt, and finding hr could 1... t snake the pi, t v subject to tiny eaelite,4 law on tue subject, he liCtillueit'egi i sugtotution to expose him hefore the It ibmial of Tile par, graph in question was consequently publi,n r d. The Court under nll the circuits-Morel. sentenced the 0... fentlant to pay a fine of 501., *gulch he paid, itJ tra, dis charged. YDROPHOIIIa.—A valuable horse belonging to Mr. C. Styring, was bitten, r kw weeks ago, by a dog ascertained to have been mad. On Monday last strona symptoms of the disease became apparent, and 011 the following morning it was found exiwoi, tit to shoat him, and put an end to his snlierings. 'rite poor aniusa I was in dreadful agoisi, and bit t ere thing around isms. Several medical gentlemen, we tintfersiam . .. attended to witness the sympwsis and mark thejinagresa 14 . ilia • dreadful disoreer. At six o'clock on Monday evening a fire broke out its the us mu factory of Mr.Co.vin, ink-maker, hittig.ttreet. Clerkenwell, which caused great apprehension in the neighbourhood, f its viciuity to some saw t uilis an I tinila.r.yard in which was dot's:tea an • se stock of wood. Several engines were 011 the 11101 in a smut time, and being well worked and supplied with water, confil e I the flames to the premises where is began, which were, so spite of the exertions of the firemen, reduced to ruin in a shot t sue. :1 • it. ;i- Fl. bt ( t C- T. .1