Take the following as truth: Even worse for the Court, after invalidating the restriction on this conventional First Amendment ground, League of Women Voters goes on to say that [o]f course, the restriction on editorializing would plainly be valid if Congress were to adopt a revised version of [the statute] that permitted [public radio] stations to establish 'affiliate' organizations which could then use the station's facilities to editorialize with nonfederal funds.
Then the following statement: "The league of women voters thinks that the current restriction on editorializing is valid on its face without revisions." is true, false, or inconclusive?