Take the following as truth: His evocation of Hong Kong is full of sharp observations--on subjects ranging from politics to food to sex to servitude (Dwight Garner, Newsday ). But his protagonist, a misanthropic businessman named Neville Bunt Mullard, is deemed poorly drawn.
Then the following statement: "His evocation of hong kong is full of sharp observations on a variety of subjects." is true, false, or inconclusive?