Take the following as truth: And it is impossible to see how this difference from Rust has any bearing upon the First Amendment question, which, to repeat, is whether the funding scheme is 'manipulated' to have a 'coercive effect' on those who do not hold the subsidized position.
Then the following statement: "It is not possible to see how this difference from Rust has any bearing on the First Amendment question." is true, false, or inconclusive?