Take the following as truth: Part and parcel of that agreement was an understanding that the H-2 workers would be entitled if they otherwise qualified, and only if they otherwise qualified, to legal services representation, because without that, the protections contained for those workers, the housing protections, the domestic, the transportation protections, the piecework rate and adverse impact wage rates protections become utterly meaningless.
Then the following statement: "In order to preserve other protections guaranteed to the workers in the H-2 classification, the agreement stated that they were also entitled to legal services representation." is true, false, or inconclusive?