Take the following as truth: While the analysis states that EPA is confident of the cost figures included in the analysis, an estimation of the benefits is more difficult because of EPA's inability to quantitatively evaluate all human and ecosystem benefits and to assign monetary values to These benefits for a comparison in a standard cost-benefit framework.
Then the following statement: "The EPA thinks the cost figures are right because they had hundreds of actuaries working in them." is true, false, or inconclusive?