Take the following as truth: The Court says today, through an unprecedented (and indeed previously rejected) interpretation of the First Amendment, that we will not allow this restriction- and then, to add insult to injury, permits to stand a judgment that awards the general litigation funding that the statute does not contain.
Then the following statement: "The Court says that we can give funding even though the statue doesn't say that's true, which outraged Democrats" is true, false, or inconclusive?