Take the following as truth: the the judge presently has an opportunity to intervene uh when there's uh my understanding when there's uh a verdict and it for example there's a hung jury here in Fort Worth two day in eight to four and bam bam the guy got off uh he was uh he he was a veterinarian and killed two a father and a son okay
Then the following statement: "A veterinarian who killed a father and son was not convicted because the judge got involved." is true, false, or inconclusive?