Take the following as truth: The Court further asserts that these cases are different from Rust because the welfare funding restriction seeks to use an existing medium of expression and to control it . . . in ways which distort its usual functioning, ante, at 8. This is wrong on both the facts and the law.
Then the following statement: "As well as this, the Court points out that these cases are different from Rust." is true, false, or inconclusive?