Take the following as truth: Even worse for the Court, after invalidating the restriction on this conventional First Amendment ground, League of Women Voters goes on to say that [o]f course, the restriction on editorializing would plainly be valid if Congress were to adopt a revised version of [the statute] that permitted [public radio] stations to establish 'affiliate' organizations which could then use the station's facilities to editorialize with nonfederal funds.
Then the following statement: "The league of women voters believes that the restriction on editorializing would be valid if Congress revised the statute to permit public radio stations to start affiliate organizations that could work within the radio station to editorialize." is true, false, or inconclusive?