Take the following as truth: If Texaco executives had indulged their personal tastes for Van Gogh oil paintings at a multimillion-dollar cost to the stockholders, it would be self-evident that the stockholders had been plundered.
Then the following statement: "Even if the executives had indulged personal tastes using millions of dollars of stockholder money, it would be unclear that stockholders had been cheated." is true, false, or inconclusive?