Take the following as truth: Then the full 9th Circuit overruled its own justices in the state's favor, agreeing with the state's contention that the clients weren't harmed because the interest wouldn't be earned otherwise.
Then the following statement: "The court reversed itself and found in the state's favor, asserting that client's suffered no damage because the interest wasn't going to be earned in any case." is true, false, or inconclusive?