Take the following as truth: Two weeks ago, art historian Simon Schama predicted in The New Yorker that Pam Gems' play about midcentury British painter Stanley Spencer, his wife, and his lover would be received--unfairly, claimed Schama--as yet another formulaic contribution to the flourishing genre of painter-as-prick.
Then the following statement: "Simon Schama commented on Pam Gems' play about Stanley Spencer." is true, false, or inconclusive?