Take the following as truth: But Slate 's Jack Shafer disparages widespread comparisons of Burn Rate to Michael Lewis' Liar's Poker and attacks what he deems Wolff's  [B]y repeatedly reminding the reader of what a dishonest, scheming little shit he is, he seeks to inflate his credibility.
Then the following statement: "They were touched by the honesty of the man's words." is true, false, or inconclusive?