Take the following as truth: In the case of H-2A workers, the reading would require the conclusion that Congress intended to provide H-2A workers with legal services representation on claims arising from their employment contracts only for the very brief periods that the workers are in the United States -- potentially rendering the promise of legal representation largely meaningless.
Then the following statement: "This reading would require the conclusion that Congress had intended for H-2A workers to only get legal representation when they were in the country." is true, false, or inconclusive?