I want to know the answer to the following question:
Does minority leader act solely to advance party objectives?
All the background I'm provided with is that "For instance, a majority party riven by internal dissension, as occurred during the early 1900s when Progressive and "regular" Republicans were at loggerheads, may provide the minority leader with greater opportunities to achieve his or her priorities than if the majority party exhibited high degrees of party cohesion.". Is that enough to answer the question?