I want to know the answer to the following question:
Who has objected to the idea of IP because "property" implies scarcity?
All the background I'm provided with is that "Other arguments along these lines claim that unlike the situation with tangible property, there is no natural scarcity of a particular idea or information: once it exists at all, it can be re-used and duplicated indefinitely without such re-use diminishing the original.". Is that enough to answer the question?