I want to know the answer to the following question:
In further elaborating on the definition, how did Chalk and Jonassohn phrase the intention of the perpetrator?
All the background I'm provided with is that "" While there are various definitions of the term, Adam Jones states that the majority of genocide scholars consider that "intent to destroy" is a requirement for any act to be labelled genocide, and that there is growing agreement on the inclusion of the physical destruction criterion.". Is that enough to answer the question?