I want to know the answer to the following question:
What was Makdisi accused of doing when evaluating the parallels between European and Islamic schools?
All the background I'm provided with is that "Generally, some reviewers have pointed out the strong inclination of Makdisi of overstating his case by simply resting on "the accumulation of close parallels", but all the while failing to point to convincing channels of transmission between the Muslim and Christian world.". Is that enough to answer the question?