I want to know the answer to the following question:
What did the five-justice majority hold that Newdow lacked?
All the background I'm provided with is that "In 2002, a three judge panel on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that classroom recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance in a California public school was unconstitutional, even when students were not compelled to recite it, due to the inclusion of the phrase "under God."". Is that enough to answer the question?