I want to know the answer to the following question:
What did the court say was invaded?
All the background I'm provided with is that "The court said that in the case of copyright infringement, the province guaranteed to the copyright holder by copyright law – certain exclusive rights – is invaded, but no control, physical or otherwise, is taken over the copyright, nor is the copyright holder wholly deprived of using the copyrighted work or exercising the exclusive rights held.". Is that enough to answer the question?