I want to know the answer to the following question:
Conversely the scholars who did view the Serbs' acts as constituting genocide, were backed up by what Tribunal?
All the background I'm provided with is that "However, there are also a considerable number of scholars who have suggested that these acts did amount to genocide, and the ICTY has found in the Momcilo Krajisnik case that the actus reu, of genocide was met in Prijedor "". Is that enough to answer the question?