I want to know the answer to the following question:
What does a principled debate on the issues not support a charge of?
All the background I'm provided with is that "J. Brent Walker, Executive Director of the Baptist Joint Committee, responded to Hamburger's claims noting; "The fact that the separation of church and state has been supported by some who exhibited an anti-Catholic animus or a secularist bent does not impugn the validity of the principle.". Is that enough to answer the question?