I want to know the answer to the following question:
What did critics believe about The Sun and Lord Kilbracken's ideas on AIDS?
All the background I'm provided with is that "Critics stated that both The Sun and Lord Kilbracken cherry-picked the results from one specific study while ignoring other data reports on HIV infection and not just AIDS infection, which the critics viewed as unethical politicisation of a medical issue.". Is that enough to answer the question?